Bill Sponsor
House Bill 1895
116th Congress(2019-2020)
FAIR Act
Introduced
Introduced
Introduced in House on Mar 27, 2019
Overview
Text
Introduced
Mar 27, 2019
Latest Action
May 3, 2019
Origin Chamber
House
Type
Bill
Bill
The primary form of legislative measure used to propose law. Depending on the chamber of origin, bills begin with a designation of either H.R. or S. Joint resolution is another form of legislative measure used to propose law.
Bill Number
1895
Congress
116
Policy Area
Crime and Law Enforcement
Crime and Law Enforcement
Primary focus of measure is criminal offenses, investigation and prosecution, procedure and sentencing; corrections and imprisonment; juvenile crime; law enforcement administration. Measures concerning terrorism may fall under Emergency Management or International Affairs policy areas.
Sponsorship by Party
Republican
Michigan
Republican
Arizona
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Republican
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
District of Columbia
Republican
Florida
Democrat
Maryland
Republican
Nebraska
Republican
North Dakota
Republican
Oklahoma
Democrat
Pennsylvania
Republican
Pennsylvania
Republican
Pennsylvania
Republican
Pennsylvania
Republican
Tennessee
Democrat
Tennessee
Republican
West Virginia
Democrat
Wisconsin
House Votes (0)
Senate Votes (0)
No House votes have been held for this bill.
Summary

Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration Act of 2019 or the FAIR Act

This bill revises the procedure for and the structure of civil forfeiture.

First, the bill revises the general rules for civil forfeiture proceedings. Specifically, it (1) requires the right to counsel in all civil forfeiture proceedings, (2) raises the evidentiary standard to clear and convincing evidence for the civil forfeiture of property, (3) requires the government to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the owner of the seized property used the property with the intent to facilitate the criminal offense or knowingly consented or was willfully blind to its use in connection with the offense, and (4) expands the proportionality criteria used by a court to determine whether a civil forfeiture was constitutionally excessive.

Next, it requires the proceeds from the disposition of seized property to be deposited into the Treasury, rather than to Department of Justice accounts for law enforcement activities.

Additionally, the bill eliminates equitable sharing payments (which allow the federal government to share federally forfeited property with participating states and local law enforcement agencies).

It also adds a mens rea requirement (i.e., a knowing violation) to the prohibition against structuring financial transactions to evade reporting requirements. Further, it requires a probable cause hearing to be held within 14 days to determine if there is a violation for structuring financial transactions to evade reporting requirements, and requires the return of a monetary instrument if probable cause is not established.

Text (1)
March 27, 2019
Actions (4)
05/03/2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
03/28/2019
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
03/27/2019
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
03/27/2019
Introduced in House
Public Record
Record Updated
Nov 1, 2022 6:32:40 PM