In the Senate of the United States,
November 16, 2020.
Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 6395) entitled “An Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2021 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.”, do pass with the following
AMENDMENT:
This Act may be cited as the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021”.
(b) Table of contents.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.
Sec. 4. Budgetary effects of this Act.
Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 111. Integrated air and missile defense assessment.
Sec. 112. Report and limitation on Integrated Visual Augmentation System acquisition.
Sec. 113. Modifications to requirement for an interim cruise missile defense capability.
Sec. 121. Contract authority for Columbia-class submarine program.
Sec. 122. Limitation on Navy medium and large unmanned surface vessels.
Sec. 123. Extension of prohibition on availability of funds for Navy waterborne security barriers.
Sec. 124. Procurement authorities for certain amphibious shipbuilding programs.
Sec. 125. Fighter force structure acquisition strategy.
Sec. 126. Treatment of systems added by Congress in future President’s budget requests.
Sec. 127. Report on carrier wing composition.
Sec. 128. Report on strategy to use ALQ–249 Next Generation Jammer to ensure full spectrum electromagnetic superiority.
Sec. 141. Economic order quantity contracting authority for F–35 joint strike fighter program.
Sec. 142. Minimum aircraft levels for major mission areas.
Sec. 143. Minimum operational squadron level.
Sec. 144. Minimum Air Force bomber aircraft level.
Sec. 145. F–35 gun system.
Sec. 146. Prohibition on funding for Close Air Support Integration Group.
Sec. 147. Limitation on divestment of KC–10 and KC–135 aircraft.
Sec. 148. Limitation on retirement of U–2 and RQ–4 aircraft.
Sec. 149. Limitation on divestment of F–15C aircraft in the European theater.
Sec. 150. Air base defense development and acquisition strategy.
Sec. 151. Required solution for KC–46 aircraft remote visual system limitations.
Sec. 152. Analysis of requirements and Advanced Battle Management System capabilities.
Sec. 153. Studies on measures to assess cost-per-effect for key mission areas.
Sec. 154. Plan for operational test and utility evaluation of systems for Low-Cost Attributable Aircraft Technology program.
Sec. 155. Prohibition on retirement or divestment of A–10 aircraft.
Sec. 171. Budgeting for life-cycle cost of aircraft for the Navy, Army, and Air Force: annual plan and certification.
Sec. 172. Authority to use F–35 aircraft withheld from delivery to Government of Turkey.
Sec. 173. Transfer from Commander of United States Strategic Command to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of responsibilities and functions relating to electromagnetic spectrum operations.
Sec. 174. Cryptographic modernization schedules.
Sec. 175. Prohibition on purchase of armed overwatch aircraft.
Sec. 176. Special operations armed overwatch.
Sec. 177. Autonomic Logistics Information System redesign strategy.
Sec. 178. Contract aviation services in a country or in airspace in which a Special Federal Aviation Regulation applies.
Sec. 179. F–35 aircraft munitions.
Sec. 180. Airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance acquisition roadmap for United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 181. Requirement to accelerate the fielding and development of counter unmanned aerial systems across the joint force.
Sec. 182. Joint All Domain Command and Control requirements.
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 211. Designation and activities of senior officials for critical technology areas supportive of the National Defense Strategy.
Sec. 212. Governance of fifth-generation wireless networking in the Department of Defense.
Sec. 213. Application of artificial intelligence to the defense reform pillar of the National Defense Strategy.
Sec. 214. Extension of authorities to enhance innovation at Department of Defense laboratories.
Sec. 215. Updates to Defense Quantum Information Science and Technology Research and Development program.
Sec. 216. Program of part-time and term employment at Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratories of faculty and students from institutions of higher education.
Sec. 217. Improvements to Technology and National Security Fellowship of Department of Defense.
Sec. 218. Department of Defense research, development, and deployment of technology to support water sustainment.
Sec. 219. Development and testing of hypersonic capabilities.
Sec. 220. Disclosure requirements for recipients of Department of Defense research and development grants.
Sec. 231. Assessment on United States national security emerging biotechnology efforts and capabilities and comparison with adversaries.
Sec. 232. Independent comparative analysis of efforts by China and the United States to recruit and retain researchers in national security-related fields.
Sec. 233. Department of Defense demonstration of virtualized radio access network and massive multiple input multiple output radio arrays for fifth generation wireless networking.
Sec. 234. Independent technical review of Federal Communications Commission Order 20–48.
Sec. 235. Report on micro nuclear reactor programs.
Sec. 236. Modification to Test Resource Management Center strategic plan reporting cycle and contents.
Sec. 237. Limitation on contract awards for certain unmanned vessels.
Sec. 238. Documentation relating to the Advanced Battle Management System.
Sec. 239. Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery Test special purpose adjunct to address computational thinking.
Sec. 240. Report on use of testing facilities to research and develop hypersonic technology.
Sec. 241. Study and plan on the use of additive manufacturing and three-dimensional bioprinting in support of the warfighter.
Sec. 242. Element in annual reports on cyber science and technology activities on work with academic consortia on high priority cybersecurity research activities in Department of Defense capabilities.
Sec. 301. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 311. Modifications and technical corrections to ensure restoration of contamination by perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid.
Sec. 312. Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration Program technical edits and clarification.
Sec. 313. Survey and market research of technologies for phase out by Department of Defense of use of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam.
Sec. 314. Modification of authority to carry out military installation resilience projects.
Sec. 315. Native American Indian lands environmental mitigation program.
Sec. 316. Energy resilience and energy security measures on military installations.
Sec. 317. Modification to availability of energy cost savings for Department of Defense.
Sec. 318. Long-duration demonstration initiative and joint program.
Sec. 319. Pilot program on alternative fuel vehicle purchasing.
Sec. 320. Extension of real-time sound monitoring at Navy installations where tactical fighter aircraft operate.
Sec. 321. Study on impacts of transboundary flows, spills, or discharges of pollution or debris from the Tijuana River on personnel, activities, and installations of Department of Defense.
Sec. 322. Increase in funding for study by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention relating to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substance contamination in drinking water.
Sec. 331. Repeal of statutory requirement for notification to Director of Defense Logistics Agency three years prior to implementing changes to any uniform or uniform component.
Sec. 332. Clarification of limitation on length of overseas forward deployment of currently deployed naval vessels.
Sec. 351. Report on impact of permafrost thaw on infrastructure, facilities, and operations of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 352. Plans and reports on emergency response training for military installations.
Sec. 353. Report on implementation by Department of Defense of requirements relating to renewable fuel pumps.
Sec. 354. Report on effects of extreme weather on Department of Defense.
Sec. 371. Prohibition on divestiture of manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft operated by United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 372. Information on overseas construction projects in support of contingency operations using funds for operation and maintenance.
Sec. 373. Provision of protection to the National Museum of the Marine Corps, the National Museum of the United States Army, the National Museum of the United States Navy, and the National Museum of the United States Air Force.
Sec. 374. Inapplicability of congressional notification and dollar limitation requirements for advance billings for certain background investigations.
Sec. 375. Repeal of sunset for minimum annual purchase amount for carriers participating in the Civil Reserve Air Fleet.
Sec. 376. Improvement of the Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 377. Commission on the naming of items of the Department of Defense that commemorate the Confederate States of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America.
Sec. 378. Modifications to review of proposed actions by Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse.
Sec. 379. Adjustment in availability of appropriations for unusual cost overruns and for changes in scope of work.
Sec. 380. Requirement that Secretary of Defense implement security and emergency response recommendations relating to active shooter or terrorist attacks on installations of Department of Defense.
Sec. 381. Clarification of food ingredient requirements for food or beverages provided by the Department of Defense.
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. End strength level matters.
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support.
Sec. 415. Separate authorization by Congress of minimum end strengths for non-temporary military technicians (dual status) and maximum end strengths for temporary military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 421. Military personnel.
Sec. 501. Repeal of codified specification of authorized strengths of certain commissioned officers on active duty.
Sec. 502. Temporary expansion of availability of enhanced constructive service credit in a particular career field upon original appointment as a commissioned officer.
Sec. 503. Requirement for promotion selection board recommendation of higher placement on promotion list of officers of particular merit.
Sec. 504. Special selection review boards for review of promotion of officers subject to adverse information identified after recommendation for promotion and related matters.
Sec. 505. Number of opportunities for consideration for promotion under alternative promotion authority.
Sec. 506. Mandatory retirement for age.
Sec. 507. Clarifying and improving restatement of rules on the retired grade of commissioned officers.
Sec. 508. Repeal of authority for original appointment of regular Navy officers designated for engineering duty, aeronautical engineering duty, and special duty.
Sec. 511. Exclusion of certain reserve general and flag officers on active duty from limitations on authorized strengths.
Sec. 516. Increased access to potential recruits.
Sec. 517. Temporary authority to order retired members to active duty in high-demand, low-density assignments during war or national emergency.
Sec. 518. Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) matters.
Sec. 519. Evaluation of barriers to minority participation in certain units of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 520. Reports on diversity and inclusion in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 521. Modification of time required for expedited decisions in connection with applications for change of station or unit transfer of members who are victims of sexual assault or related offenses.
Sec. 522. Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct.
Sec. 523. Report on ability of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocates to perform duties.
Sec. 524. Briefing on Special Victims’ Counsel program.
Sec. 525. Accountability of leadership of the Department of Defense for discharging the sexual harassment policies and programs of the Department.
Sec. 526. Safe-to-report policy applicable across the Armed Forces.
Sec. 527. Additional bases for provision of advice by the Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct.
Sec. 528. Additional matters for reports of the Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct.
Sec. 529. Policy on separation of victim and accused at military service academies and degree-granting military educational institutions.
Sec. 530. Briefing on placement of members of the Armed Forces in academic status who are victims of sexual assault onto Non-Rated Periods.
Sec. 531. Right to notice of victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice regarding certain post-trial motions, filings, and hearings.
Sec. 532. Consideration of the evidence by Courts of Criminal Appeals.
Sec. 533. Preservation of records of the military justice system.
Sec. 534. Comptroller General of the United States report on implementation by the Armed Forces of recent GAO recommendations and statutory requirements on assessment of racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in the military justice system.
Sec. 535. Briefing on mental health support for vicarious trauma for certain personnel in the military justice system.
Sec. 536. Guardian ad litem program for minor dependents of members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 541. Training on religious accommodation for members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 542. Additional elements with 2021 certifications on the Ready, Relevant Learning initiative of the Navy.
Sec. 543. Report on standardization and potential merger of law enforcement training for military and civilian personnel across the Department of Defense.
Sec. 544. Quarterly reports on implementation of recommendations of the Comprehensive Review of Special Operations Forces Culture and Ethics.
Sec. 545. Information on nominations and applications for military service academies.
Sec. 546. Pilot programs in connection with Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and minority institutions.
Sec. 547. Expansion of Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps Program.
Sec. 548. Department of Defense STARBASE Program.
Sec. 551. Award or presentation of decorations favorably recommended following determination on merits of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.
Sec. 552. Honorary promotion matters.
Sec. 561. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 562. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities.
Sec. 563. Staffing of Department of Defense Education Activity schools to maintain maximum student-to-teacher ratios.
Sec. 564. Matters in connection with free appropriate public education for dependents of members of the Armed Forces with special needs.
Sec. 565. Pilot program on expanded eligibility for Department of Defense Education Activity Virtual High School program.
Sec. 566. Pilot program on expansion of eligibility for enrollment at domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools.
Sec. 567. Comptroller General of the United States report on the structural condition of Department of Defense Education Activity schools.
Sec. 571. Responsibility for allocation of certain funds for military child development programs.
Sec. 572. Improvements to Exceptional Family Member Program.
Sec. 573. Procedures of the Office of Special Needs for the development of individualized services plans for military families with special needs.
Sec. 574. Restatement and clarification of authority to reimburse members for spouse relicensing costs pursuant to a permanent change of station.
Sec. 575. Improvements to Department of Defense tracking of and response to incidents of child abuse involving military dependents on military installations.
Sec. 576. Military child care and child development center matters.
Sec. 577. Expansion of financial assistance under My Career Advancement Account program.
Sec. 586. Removal of personally identifying and other information of certain persons from investigative reports, the Department of Defense Central Index of Investigations, and other records and databases.
Sec. 587. National emergency exception for timing requirements with respect to certain surveys of members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 588. Sunset and transfer of functions of the Physical Disability Board of Review.
Sec. 589. Extension of reporting deadline for the annual report on the assessment of the effectiveness of activities of the federal voting assistance program.
Sec. 590. Pilot programs on remote provision by National Guard to State governments and National Guards of other States of cybersecurity technical assistance in training, preparation, and response to cyber incidents.
Sec. 591. Plan on performance of funeral honors details by members of other Armed Forces when members of the Armed Force of the deceased are unavailable.
Sec. 592. Limitation on implementation of Army Combat Fitness Test.
Sec. 593. Report on impact of children of certain Filipino World War II veterans on national security, foreign policy, and economic and humanitarian interests of the United States.
Sec. 601. Reorganization of certain allowances other than travel and transportation allowances.
Sec. 602. Hazardous duty pay for members of the Armed Forces performing duty in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019.
Sec. 603. Compensation and credit for retired pay purposes for maternity leave taken by members of the reserve components.
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and special pay authorities.
Sec. 612. Increase in special and incentive pays for officers in health professions.
Sec. 621. Inclusion of drill or training foregone due to emergency travel or duty restrictions in computations of entitlement to and amounts of retired pay for non-regular service.
Sec. 622. Modernization and clarification of payment of certain Reserves while on duty.
Sec. 623. Relief of Richard W. Collins III.
Sec. 631. Permanent authority for and enhancement of the Government lodging program.
Sec. 632. Approval of certain activities by retired and reserve members of the uniformed services.
Sec. 701. Authority for Secretary of Defense to manage provider type referral and supervision requirements under TRICARE program.
Sec. 702. Removal of Christian Science providers as authorized providers under the TRICARE program.
Sec. 703. Waiver of fees charged to certain civilians for emergency medical treatment provided at military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 704. Mental health resources for members of the Armed Forces and their dependents during the COVID–19 pandemic.
Sec. 705. Transitional health benefits for certain members of the National Guard serving under orders in response to the coronavirus (COVID–19).
Sec. 706. Extramedical maternal health providers demonstration project.
Sec. 707. Pilot program on receipt of non-generic prescription maintenance medications under TRICARE pharmacy benefits program.
Sec. 721. Modifications to transfer of Army Medical Research and Development Command and public health commands to Defense Health Agency.
Sec. 722. Delay of applicability of administration of TRICARE dental plans through Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program.
Sec. 723. Authority of Secretary of Defense to waive requirements during national emergencies for purposes of provision of health care.
Sec. 741. Extension of authority for Joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund.
Sec. 742. Membership of Board of Regents of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Sec. 743. Military Health System Clinical Quality Management Program.
Sec. 744. Modifications to pilot program on civilian and military partnerships to enhance interoperability and medical surge capability and capacity of National Disaster Medical System.
Sec. 745. Study on force mix options and service models to enhance readiness of medical force of the Armed Forces to provide combat casualty care.
Sec. 746. Comptroller General study on delivery of mental health services to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 747. Review and report on prevention of suicide among members of the Armed Forces stationed at remote installations outside the contiguous United States.
Sec. 748. Audit of medical conditions of tenants in privatized military housing.
Sec. 749. Comptroller General study on prenatal and postpartum mental health conditions among members of the Armed Forces and their dependents.
Sec. 750. Plan for evaluation of flexible spending account options for members of the uniformed services and their families.
Sec. 751. Assessment of receipt by civilians of emergency medical treatment at military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 752. Report on billing practices for health care from Department of Defense.
Sec. 753. Access of veterans to Individual Longitudinal Exposure Record.
Sec. 754. Study on the incidence of cancer diagnosis and mortality among military aviators and aviation support personnel.
Sec. 761. Short title.
Sec. 762. Expansion of eligibility for readjustment counseling and related outpatient services from Department of Veterans Affairs to include members of reserve components of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 763. Provision of mental health services from Department of Veterans Affairs to members of reserve components of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 764. Inclusion of members of reserve components in mental health programs of Department of Veterans Affairs.
Sec. 765. Report on mental health and related services provided by Department of Veterans Affairs to members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 801. Policy recommendations for implementation of Executive Order 13806 (Assessing and Strengthening the Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain Resiliency).
Sec. 802. Assessment of national security innovation base.
Sec. 803. Improving implementation of policy pertaining to the national technology and industrial base.
Sec. 804. Modification of framework for modernizing acquisition processes to ensure integrity of industrial base.
Sec. 805. Assessments of industrial base capabilities and capacity.
Sec. 806. Analyses of certain materials and technology sectors for action to address sourcing and industrial capacity.
Sec. 807. Microelectronics manufacturing strategy.
Sec. 808. Additional requirements pertaining to printed circuit boards.
Sec. 809. Statement of policy with respect to supply of strategic minerals and metals for Department of Defense purposes.
Sec. 810. Report on strategic and critical minerals and metals.
Sec. 811. Stabilization of shipbuilding industrial base workforce.
Sec. 812. Miscellaneous limitations on the procurement of goods other than United States goods.
Sec. 813. Use of domestically sourced star trackers in national security satellites.
Sec. 814. Modification to small purchase threshold exception to sourcing requirements for certain articles.
Sec. 831. Report on acquisition risk assessment and mitigation as part of Adaptive Acquisition Framework implementation.
Sec. 832. Comptroller General report on implementation of software acquisition reforms.
Sec. 841. Authority to acquire innovative commercial products and services using general solicitation competitive procedures.
Sec. 842. Truth in Negotiations Act threshold for Department of Defense contracts.
Sec. 843. Revision of proof required when using an evaluation factor for defense contractors employing or subcontracting with members of the selected reserve of the reserve components of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 844. Contract authority for advanced development of initial or additional prototype units.
Sec. 845. Definition of business system deficiencies for contractor business systems.
Sec. 846. Repeal of pilot program on payment of costs for denied Government Accountability Office bid protests.
Sec. 861. Implementation of modular open systems architecture requirements.
Sec. 862. Sustainment reviews.
Sec. 863. Recommendations for future direct selections.
Sec. 864. Disclosures for certain shipbuilding major defense acquisition program offers.
Sec. 871. Prompt payment of contractors.
Sec. 872. Extension of pilot program for streamlined awards for innovative technology programs.
Sec. 873. Reporting requirements.
Sec. 881. Inclusion of software in government performance of acquisition functions.
Sec. 882. Balancing security and innovation in software development and acquisition.
Sec. 883. Comptroller General report on intellectual property acquisition and licensing.
Sec. 884. Pilot program exploring the use of consumption-based solutions to address software-intensive warfighting capability.
Sec. 891. Safeguarding defense-sensitive United States intellectual property, technology, and other data and information.
Sec. 892. Domestic comparative testing activities.
Sec. 893. Repeal of apprenticeship program.
Sec. 901. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict and related matters.
Sec. 902. Redesignation and codification in law of Office of Economic Adjustment.
Sec. 903. Modernization of process used by the Department of Defense to identify, task, and manage Congressional reporting requirements.
Sec. 904. Inclusion of Vice Chief of the National Guard Bureau as an advisor to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council.
Sec. 905. Assignment of responsibility for the Arctic region within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 911. Termination of position of Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 912. Report on assignment of responsibilities, duties, and authorities of Chief Management Officer to other officers or employees of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 913. Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 914. Assignment of certain responsibilities and duties to particular officers of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 915. Assignment of responsibilities and duties of Chief Management Officer to officers or employees of the Department of Defense to be designated.
Sec. 916. Definition of enterprise business operations for title 10, United States Code.
Sec. 917. Annual report on enterprise business operations of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 918. Conforming amendments.
Sec. 931. Clarification of Space Force and Chief of Space Operations authorities.
Sec. 931A. Office of the Chief of Space Operations.
Sec. 932. Amendments to Department of the Air Force provisions in title 10, United States Code.
Sec. 933. Amendments to other provisions of title 10, United States Code.
Sec. 934. Amendments to provisions of law relating to pay and allowances.
Sec. 935. Amendments relating to provisions of law on veterans’ benefits.
Sec. 936. Amendments to other provisions of the United States Code.
Sec. 937. Applicability to other provisions of law.
Sec. 941. Matters relating to reserve components for the Space Force.
Sec. 942. Transfers of military and civilian personnel to the Space Force.
Sec. 943. Limitation on transfer of military installations to the jurisdiction of the Space Force.
Sec. 944. Clarification of procurement of commercial satellite communications services.
Sec. 945. Temporary exemption from authorized daily average of members in pay grades E–8 and E–9.
Sec. 946. Application of acquisition demonstration project to Department of the Air Force employees assigned to acquisition positions within the Space Force.
Sec. 947. Air and Space Force Medal.
Sec. 951. Annual report on establishment of field operating agencies.
Sec. 952. Briefing on assignment of members of the Armed Forces on active duty to the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 953. Threats to United States forces from small unmanned aerial systems worldwide.
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Application of Financial Improvement and Audit Remediation Plan to fiscal years following fiscal year 2020.
Sec. 1003. Incentives for the achievement by the components of the Department of Defense of unqualified audit opinions on the financial statements.
Sec. 1011. Codification of authority for joint task forces of the Department of Defense to support law enforcement agencies conducting counterterrorism or counter-transnational organized crime activities.
Sec. 1021. Modification of authority to purchase used vessels with funds in the National Defense Sealift Fund.
Sec. 1022. Waiver during war or threat to national security of restrictions on overhaul, repair, or maintenance of vessels in foreign shipyards.
Sec. 1023. Modification of waiver authority on prohibition on use of funds for retirement of certain legacy maritime mine countermeasure platforms.
Sec. 1024. Extension of authority for reimbursement of expenses for certain Navy mess operations afloat.
Sec. 1025. Sense of Congress on actions necessary to achieve a 355-ship Navy.
Sec. 1031. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States.
Sec. 1032. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to close or relinquish control of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1033. Extension of prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to certain countries.
Sec. 1034. Extension of prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1041. Inclusion of disaster-related emergency preparedness activities among law enforcement activities authorities for sale or donation of excess personal property of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1042. Expenditure of funds for Department of Defense clandestine activities that support operational preparation of the environment.
Sec. 1043. Clarification of authority of military commissions under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, to punish contempt.
Sec. 1044. Prohibition on actions to infringe upon First Amendment rights of peaceable assembly and petition for redress of grievances.
Sec. 1045. Arctic planning, research, and development.
Sec. 1046. Consideration of security risks in certain telecommunications architecture for future overseas basing decisions of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1047. Foreign military training programs.
Sec. 1048. Reporting of adverse events relating to consumer products on military installations.
Sec. 1049. Inclusion of United States Naval Sea Cadet Corps among youth and charitable organizations authorized to receive assistance from the National Guard.
Sec. 1050. Department of Defense policy for the regulation of dangerous dogs.
Sec. 1051. Sense of Congress on the basing of KC–46A aircraft outside the contiguous United States.
Sec. 1052. Efficient use of sensitive compartmented information facilities.
Sec. 1053. Assistance for farmer and rancher stress and mental health of individuals in rural areas.
Sec. 1054. Additional conditions and limitations on the transfer of Department of Defense property for law enforcement activities.
Sec. 1061. Report on potential improvements to certain military educational institutions of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1062. Reports on status and modernization of the North Warning System.
Sec. 1063. Studies on the force structure for Marine Corps aviation.
Sec. 1064. Study on unemployment rate of female veterans who served on active duty in the Armed Forces after September 11, 2001.
Sec. 1065. Report on Great Lakes and inland waterways seaports.
Sec. 1066. Report on the Chemical and Biological Defense Program of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1067. Report on round-the-clock availability of childcare for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense who work rotating shifts.
Sec. 1081. Department of Defense strategic Arctic ports.
Sec. 1082. Personal protective equipment matters.
Sec. 1083. Estimate of damages from Federal Communications Commission Order 20–48.
Sec. 1084. Modernization effort.
Sec. 1085. Sense of Senate on Gold Star Families Remembrance Week.
Sec. 1086. Continuity of the Economy Plan.
Sec. 1087. Improving the authority for operations of unmanned aircraft for educational purposes.
Sec. 1088. Requirement to post a 100 word summary to regulations.gov.
Sec. 1089. Modification of licensure requirements for health care professionals providing treatment via telemedicine.
Sec. 1090. Restrictions on Confucius Institutes.
Sec. 1090A. Additional care for newborn children of veterans.
Sec. 1090B. Additional diseases associated with exposure to certain herbicide agents for which there is a presumption of service connection for veterans who served in the Republic of Vietnam.
Sec. 1091. Definitions.
Sec. 1092. Communications technology security funds.
Sec. 1093. Promoting United States leadership in international organizations and communications standards-setting bodies.
Sec. 1094. Semiconductor incentive grants.
Sec. 1095. Department of Defense.
Sec. 1096. Department of Commerce study on status of microelectronics technologies in the United States industrial base.
Sec. 1097. Funding for development and adoption of measurably secure microelectronics and measurably secure microelectronics supply chains.
Sec. 1098. Advanced semiconductor research and design.
Sec. 1099. Prohibition relating to foreign adversaries.
Sec. 1101. Enhanced pay authority for certain acquisition and technology positions in the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1102. Enhanced pay authority for certain research and technology positions in the science and technology reinvention laboratories of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1103. Extension of enhanced appointment and compensation authority for civilian personnel for care and treatment of wounded and injured members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1104. Extension of overtime rate authority for Department of the Navy employees performing work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier forward deployed in Japan.
Sec. 1105. Expansion of direct hire authority for certain Department of Defense personnel to include installation military housing office positions supervising privatized military housing.
Sec. 1106. Extension of sunset of inapplicability of certification of executive qualifications by qualification certification review board of Office of Personnel Management for initial appointments to Senior Executive Service positions in Department of Defense.
Sec. 1107. Pilot program on enhanced pay authority for certain high-level management positions in the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1108. Pilot program on expanded authority for appointment of recently retired members of the Armed Forces to positions in the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1109. Direct hire authority and relocation incentives for positions at remote locations.
Sec. 1110. Modification of direct hire authority for certain personnel involved with Department of Defense maintenance activities.
Sec. 1110A. Fire Fighters Alternative Work Schedule demonstration project for the Navy Region Mid-Atlantic Fire and Emergency Services.
Sec. 1110B. Report by Comptroller General of the United States on diversity and inclusion within the civilian workforce of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1111. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1112. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1113. Technical amendments to authority for reimbursement of Federal, State, and local income taxes incurred during travel, transportation, and relocation.
Sec. 1201. Authority to build capacity for additional operations.
Sec. 1202. Authority to build capacity for air sovereignty operations.
Sec. 1203. Modification to the Inter-European Air Forces Academy.
Sec. 1204. Modification to support of special operations for irregular warfare.
Sec. 1205. Extension and modification of authority to support border security operations of certain foreign countries.
Sec. 1206. Modification of authority for participation in multinational centers of excellence.
Sec. 1207. Implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017.
Sec. 1208. Ted Stevens Center for Arctic Security Studies.
Sec. 1209. Functional Center for Security Studies in Irregular Warfare.
Sec. 1210. Open Technology Fund.
Sec. 1211. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.
Sec. 1212. Extension and modification of Commanders' Emergency Response Program.
Sec. 1213. Extension and modification of support for reconciliation activities led by the Government of Afghanistan.
Sec. 1214. Sense of Senate on special immigrant visa program for Afghan allies.
Sec. 1215. Sense of Senate and report on United States presence in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1221. Extension of authority and limitation on use of funds to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
Sec. 1222. Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to vetted Syrian groups and individuals.
Sec. 1223. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1231. Extension of limitation on military cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1232. Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea.
Sec. 1233. Modification and extension of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative.
Sec. 1234. Report on capability and capacity requirements of military forces of Ukraine and resource plan for security assistance.
Sec. 1235. Sense of Senate on North Atlantic Treaty Organization enhanced opportunities partner status for Ukraine.
Sec. 1236. Extension of authority for training for Eastern European national security forces in the course of multilateral exercises.
Sec. 1237. Sense of Senate on Kosovo and the role of the Kosovo Force of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Sec. 1238. Sense of Senate on strategic competition with the Russian Federation and related activities of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1239. Report on Russian Federation support of racially and ethnically motivated violent extremists.
Sec. 1240. Participation in European program on multilateral exchange of surface transportation services.
Sec. 1241. Participation in programs relating to coordination or exchange of air refueling and air transportation services.
Sec. 1242. Sense of Congress on support for coordinated action to ensure the security of Baltic allies.
Sec. 1251. Pacific Deterrence Initiative.
Sec. 1252. Sense of Senate on the United States-Vietnam defense relationship.
Sec. 1253. Authority to transfer funds for Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup.
Sec. 1254. Cooperative program with Vietnam to account for Vietnamese personnel missing in action.
Sec. 1255. Provision of goods and services at Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands.
Sec. 1256. Authority to establish a Movement Coordination Center Pacific in the Indo-Pacific region and participate in an Air Transport and Air-to-Air Refueling and other Exchanges of Services program.
Sec. 1257. Training of ally and partner air forces in Guam.
Sec. 1258. Statement of policy and sense of Senate on the Taiwan Relations Act.
Sec. 1259. Sense of Congress on port calls in Taiwan with the USNS Comfort and the USNS Mercy .
Sec. 1260. Limitation on use of funds to reduce total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are deployed to the Republic of Korea.
Sec. 1261. Sense of Congress on co-development with Japan of a long-range ground-based anti-ship cruise missile system.
Sec. 1262. Statement of policy on cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region.
Sec. 1263. Extension of prohibition on commercial export of certain munitions to the Hong Kong Police Force.
Sec. 1264. Implementation of the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act with regard to Taiwan arms sales.
Sec. 1271. Review of and report on overdue acquisition and cross-servicing agreement transactions.
Sec. 1272. Report on burden sharing contributions by designated countries.
Sec. 1273. Report on risk to personnel, equipment, and operations due to Huawei 5G architecture in host countries.
Sec. 1274. Allied burden sharing report.
Sec. 1281. Reciprocal patient movement agreements.
Sec. 1282. Extension of authorization of non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1283. Extension of Department of Defense support for stabilization activities in national security interest of the United States.
Sec. 1284. Notification with respect to withdrawal of members of the Armed Forces participating in the Multinational Force and Observers in Egypt.
Sec. 1285. Modification to initiative to support protection of national security academic researchers from undue influence and other security threats.
Sec. 1286. Establishment of United States-Israel Operations-Technology Working Group.
Sec. 1287. Improved coordination of United States sanctions policy.
Sec. 1291. Short title.
Sec. 1292. Assistance for United States nationals unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad.
Sec. 1293. Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs.
Sec. 1294. Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell.
Sec. 1295. Hostage Response Group.
Sec. 1296. Authorization of imposition of sanctions.
Sec. 1297. Definitions.
Sec. 1298. Rule of construction.
Sec. 1301. Funding allocations for Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1405. Defense Health Program.
Sec. 1411. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home.
Sec. 1412. Periodic inspections of Armed Forces Retirement Home facilities by nationally recognized accrediting organization.
Sec. 1413. Expansion of eligibility for residence at the Armed Forces Retirement Home.
Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 1503. Procurement.
Sec. 1504. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 1505. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1506. Military personnel.
Sec. 1507. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1508. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1509. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1510. Defense Health Program.
Sec. 1521. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1522. Special transfer authority.
Sec. 1531. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1532. Transition and enhancement of inspector general authorities for Afghanistan reconstruction.
Sec. 1601. Resilient and survivable positioning, navigation, and timing capabilities.
Sec. 1602. Development efforts for National Security Space Launch providers.
Sec. 1603. Timeline for nonrecurring design validation for responsive space launch.
Sec. 1604. Tactically responsive space launch operations.
Sec. 1605. Conforming amendments relating to reestablishment of Space Command.
Sec. 1606. Space Development Agency development requirements and transfer to Space Force.
Sec. 1607. Space launch rate assessment.
Sec. 1608. Report on impact of acquisition strategy for the National Security Space Launch Program on emerging foreign space launch providers.
Sec. 1609. Leveraging commercial satellite remote sensing.
Sec. 1611. Modification of position of Principal Cyber Advisor.
Sec. 1612. Framework for cyber hunt forward operations.
Sec. 1613. Modification of scope of notification requirements for sensitive military cyber operations.
Sec. 1614. Modification of requirements for quarterly Department of Defense cyber operations briefings for Congress.
Sec. 1615. Rationalization and integration of parallel cybersecurity architectures and operations.
Sec. 1616. Modification of acquisition authority of Commander of United States Cyber Command.
Sec. 1617. Assessment of cyber operational planning and deconfliction policies and processes.
Sec. 1618. Pilot program on cybersecurity capability metrics.
Sec. 1619. Assessment of effect of inconsistent timing and use of Network Address Translation in Department of Defense networks.
Sec. 1620. Matters concerning the College of Information and Cyberspace at National Defense University.
Sec. 1621. Modification of mission of cyber command and assignment of cyber operations forces.
Sec. 1622. Integration of Department of Defense user activity monitoring and cybersecurity.
Sec. 1623. Defense industrial base cybersecurity sensor architecture plan.
Sec. 1624. Extension of Cyberspace Solarium Commission to track and assess implementation.
Sec. 1625. Review of regulations and promulgation of guidance relating to National Guard responses to cyber attacks.
Sec. 1626. Improvements relating to the quadrennial cyber posture review.
Sec. 1627. Report on enabling United States Cyber Command resource allocation.
Sec. 1628. Evaluation of options for establishing a cyber reserve force.
Sec. 1629. Ensuring cyber resiliency of nuclear command and control system.
Sec. 1630. Modification of requirements relating to the Strategic Cybersecurity Program and the evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1631. Defense industrial base participation in a cybersecurity threat intelligence sharing program.
Sec. 1632. Assessment on defense industrial base cybersecurity threat hunting.
Sec. 1633. Assessing risk to national security of quantum computing.
Sec. 1634. Applicability of reorientation of Big Data Platform program to Department of Navy.
Sec. 1635. Expansion of authority for access and information relating to cyber attacks on operationally critical contractors of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 1636. Requirements for review of and limitations on the Joint Regional Security Stacks activity.
Sec. 1637. Independent assessment of establishment of a National Cyber Director.
Sec. 1638. Modification of authority to use operation and maintenance funds for cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects.
Sec. 1639. Personnel management authority for Commander of United States Cyber Command and development program for offensive cyber operations.
Sec. 1640. Implementation of information operations matters.
Sec. 1641. Report on Cyber Institutes Program.
Sec. 1642. Assistance for small manufacturers in the defense industrial supply chain on matters relating to cybersecurity.
Sec. 1643. Study on cyberexploitation of members of the Armed Forces and their families.
Sec. 1651. Modification to responsibilities of Nuclear Weapons Council.
Sec. 1652. Responsibility of Nuclear Weapons Council in preparation of National Nuclear Security Administration budget.
Sec. 1653. Modification of Government Accountability Office review of annual reports on nuclear weapons enterprise.
Sec. 1654. Prohibition on reduction of the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States.
Sec. 1655. Sense of the Senate on nuclear cooperation between the United States and the United Kingdom.
Sec. 1661. Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system and Israeli cooperative missile defense program co-development and co-production.
Sec. 1662. Acceleration of the deployment of hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor payload.
Sec. 1663. Extension of prohibition relating to missile defense information and systems.
Sec. 1664. Report on and limitation on expenditure of funds for layered homeland missile defense system.
Sec. 1665. Extension of requirement for Comptroller General review and assessment of missile defense acquisition programs.
Sec. 1666. Repeal of requirement for reporting structure of Missile Defense Agency.
Sec. 1667. Ground-based midcourse defense interim capability.
Sec. 1701. Short title.
Sec. 1702. Definitions.
Sec. 1703. Findings.
Sec. 1704. Sense of Congress regarding Hong Kong.
Sec. 1705. Identification of foreign persons involved in the erosion of the obligations of China under the Joint Declaration or the Basic Law and foreign financial institutions that conduct significant transactions with those persons.
Sec. 1706. Sanctions with respect to foreign persons that contravene the obligations of China under the Joint Declaration or the Basic Law.
Sec. 1707. Sanctions with respect to foreign financial institutions that conduct significant transactions with foreign persons that contravene the obligations of China under the Joint Declaration or the Basic Law.
Sec. 1708. Waiver, termination, exceptions, and congressional review process.
Sec. 1709. Implementation; penalties.
Sec. 1710. Rule of construction.
Sec. 1711. Exception relating to importation of goods.
Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.
Sec. 2003. Effective date.
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2017 project at Camp Walker, Korea.
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2018 project at Royal Air Force Lakenheath.
Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects.
Sec. 2307. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 family housing projects.
Sec. 2308. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2020 projects.
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
Sec. 2503. Execution of projects under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.
Sec. 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects.
Sec. 2512. Qatar funded construction projects.
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.
Sec. 2607. Modification of authority to carry out fiscal year 2020 project in Alabama.
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account.
Sec. 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) round.
Sec. 2703. Plan to finish remediation activities conducted by the Secretary of the Army in Umatilla, Oregon.
Sec. 2801. Responsibility of Navy for military construction requirements for certain Fleet Readiness Centers.
Sec. 2802. Construction of ground-based strategic deterrent launch facilities and launch centers for Air Force.
Sec. 2821. Prohibition on substandard family housing units.
Sec. 2822. Technical corrections to privatized military housing program.
Sec. 2823. Requirement that Secretary of Defense implement recommendations relating to military family housing contained in report by Inspector General of Department of Defense.
Sec. 2841. Promotion of energy resilience and energy security in privatized utility systems.
Sec. 2842. Consideration of energy security and energy resilience in life-cycle cost for military construction.
Sec. 2861. Renewal of Fallon Range Training Complex land withdrawal and reservation.
Sec. 2862. Renewal of Nevada Test and Training Range land withdrawal and reservation.
Sec. 2863. Transfer of land under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior within Naval Support Activity Panama City, Florida.
Sec. 2864. Land conveyance, Camp Navajo, Arizona.
Sec. 2881. Military family readiness considerations in basing decisions.
Sec. 2882. Prohibition on use of funds to reduce air base resiliency or demolish protected aircraft shelters in the European theater without creating a similar protection from attack.
Sec. 2883. Prohibitions relating to closure or returning to host nation of existing bases under the European Consolidation Initiative.
Sec. 2884. Enhancement of authority to accept conditional gifts of real property on behalf of military museums.
Sec. 2885. Equal treatment of insured depository institutions and credit unions operating on military installations.
Sec. 2886. Report on operational aviation units impacted by noise restrictions or noise mitigation measures.
Sec. 2887. Transfer of funds for Oklahoma City national memorial endowment fund.
Sec. 2901. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2902. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2903. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 2904. Replenishment of certain military constructions funds.
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Sec. 3104. Nuclear energy.
Sec. 3111. Review of adequacy of nuclear weapons budget.
Sec. 3121. National Nuclear Security Administration Personnel System.
Sec. 3122. Inclusion of certain employees and contractors of Department of Energy in definition of public safety officer for purposes of certain death benefits.
Sec. 3123. Reimbursement for liability insurance for nuclear materials couriers.
Sec. 3124. Transportation and moving expenses for immediate family of deceased nuclear materials couriers.
Sec. 3125. Extension of authority for appointment of certain scientific, engineering, and technical personnel.
Sec. 3131. Reporting on penetrations of networks of contractors and subcontractors.
Sec. 3132. Clarification of responsibility for cybersecurity of National Nuclear Security Administration facilities.
Sec. 3141. Public statement of environmental liabilities for facilities undergoing defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3142. Inclusion of missed milestones in future-years defense environmental cleanup plan.
Sec. 3143. Classification of defense environmental cleanup as capital asset projects or operations activities.
Sec. 3144. Continued analysis of approaches for supplemental treatment of low-activity waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
Sec. 3151. Modifications to enhanced procurement authority to manage supply chain risk.
Sec. 3152. Prohibition on use of laboratory- or production facility-directed research and development funds for general and administrative overhead costs.
Sec. 3153. Monitoring of industrial base for nuclear weapons components, subsystems, and materials.
Sec. 3154. Prohibition on use of funds for advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium.
Sec. 3155. Authorization of appropriations for W93 nuclear warhead program.
Sec. 3156. Review of future of computing beyond exascale at the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3157. Application of requirement for independent cost estimates and reviews to new nuclear weapon systems.
Sec. 3159. Integration of stockpile stewardship and nonproliferation missions
Sec. 3160. Technology development and integration program.
Sec. 3161. Advanced manufacturing development program.
Sec. 3162. Materials science program.
Sec. 3163. Modifications to Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High Yield Program.
Sec. 3164. Earned value management program for life extension programs.
Sec. 3165. Use of high performance computing capabilities for COVID–19 research.
Sec. 3166. Availability of stockpile responsiveness funds for projects to reduce time necessary to execute a nuclear test.
Sec. 3167. Sense of the Senate on extension of limitations on importation of uranium from Russian Federation.
Sec. 3201. Authorization.
Sec. 3202. Nonpublic collaborative discussions by Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
Sec. 3203. Improvements to operations of Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
Sec. 3501. Maritime Administration.
Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.
Sec. 4101. PROCUREMENT.
Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4401. Military personnel.
Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.
Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4601. Military construction.
Sec. 4602. Military construction for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs.
Sec. 5111. Report on CH–47F Chinook Block–II upgrade.
Sec. 5121. Limitation on alteration of Navy fleet mix.
Sec. 5211. Importance of historically Black colleges and universities and minority-serving institutions.
Sec. 5221. National coordinating entity for sustainable chemistry.
Sec. 5222. Strategic plan for sustainable chemistry.
Sec. 5223. Agency activities in support of sustainable chemistry.
Sec. 5224. Partnerships in sustainable chemistry.
Sec. 5225. Prioritization.
Sec. 5226. Rule of construction.
Sec. 5227. Major multi-user research facility project.
Sec. 5231. Improving National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education.
Sec. 5232. Development of standards and guidelines for improving cybersecurity workforce of Federal agencies.
Sec. 5233. Modifications to Federal cyber scholarship-for-service program.
Sec. 5234. Modifications to Federal cyber scholarship-for-service program.
Sec. 5235. Cybersecurity in programs of the National Science Foundation.
Sec. 5236. Cybersecurity in STEM programs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Sec. 5237. Cybersecurity in Department of Transportation programs.
Sec. 5238. National Cybersecurity Challenges.
Sec. 5239. Internet of Things.
Sec. 5241. Report on Department of Defense strategy on artificial intelligence standards.
Sec. 5242. Study on establishment of energetics program office.
Sec. 5243. Deepfake report.
Sec. 5244. CISA Director.
Sec. 5245. Agency review.
Sec. 5246. General Services Administration review.
Sec. 5331. Use of cost savings realized from intergovernmental services agreements for installation-support services.
Sec. 5351. Report on non-permissive, global positioning system denied airfield capabilities.
Sec. 5371. Increase of amounts available to Marine Corps for base operations and support.
Sec. 5372. Modernization of congressional reports process.
Sec. 5516. Report on implementation of recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States on recruitment and retention of female members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 5551. Report on regulations and procedures to implement programs on award of medals or commendations to handlers of military working dogs.
Sec. 5571. Independent study and report on military spouse underemployment.
Sec. 5586. Questions regarding racism, anti-Semitism, and supremacism in workplace surveys administered by the Secretary of Defense.
Sec. 5587. Briefing on the implementation of requirements on connections of retiring and separating members of the Armed Forces with community-based organizations and related entities.
Sec. 5590. Pilot programs on remote provision by National Guard to State governments and National Guards of other States of cybersecurity technical assistance in training, preparation, and response to cyber incidents.
Sec. 5707. Pilot program on receipt of non-generic prescription maintenance medications under TRICARE pharmacy benefits program.
Sec. 5723. Authority of Secretary of Defense to waive requirements during national emergencies for purposes of provision of health care.
Sec. 5741. Study and report on surge capacity of Department of Defense to establish negative air room containment systems in military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 5801. Report on use of domestic nonavailability determinations.
Sec. 5802. Report on the effect of the Defense Manufacturing Communities Support Program on the defense supply chain.
Sec. 5803. Improving implementation of policy pertaining to the national technology and industrial base.
Sec. 5808. Additional requirements pertaining to printed circuit boards.
Sec. 5812. Miscellaneous limitations on the procurement of goods other than United States goods.
Sec. 5841. Waivers of certain conditions for progress payments under certain contracts during the COVID–19 national emergency.
Sec. 5871. Office of Small Business and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.
Sec. 5872. Eligibility of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands for certain Small Business Administration programs.
Sec. 5873. Disaster declaration in rural areas.
Sec. 5874. Temporary extension for 8(a) participants.
Sec. 5875. Maximum award price for sole source manufacturing contracts.
Sec. 5876. Annual reports regarding the SBIR program of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 5877. Small business loans for nonprofit child care providers.
Sec. 5891. Listing of other transaction authority consortia.
Sec. 5892. Report recommending disposition of notes to certain sections of title 10, United States Code.
Sec. 5893. Applicability of reporting requirement related to notional milestones and standard timelines for foreign military sales.
Sec. 5894. Additional requirements related to mitigating risks related to foreign ownership, control, or influence of Department of Defense contractors and subcontractors.
Sec. 5951. Comptroller General of the United States report on vulnerabilities of the Department of Defense resulting from offshore technical support call centers.
Sec. 6001. Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) reports on improving the budget justification and related materials of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 6002. Report on fiscal year 2022 budget request requirements in connection with Air Force operations in the Arctic.
Sec. 6003. Providing information to States regarding undelivered savings bonds.
Sec. 6046. Conditions for permanently basing United States equipment or additional military units in host countries with at-risk vendors in 5G or 6G networks.
Sec. 6047. Antidiscrimination.
Sec. 6061. Maritime security and domain awareness.
Sec. 6062. Report on pandemic preparedness and planning of the Navy.
Sec. 6063. Study and report on the affordability of insulin.
Sec. 6081. Modification to First Division monument.
Sec. 6082. Estimate of damages from Federal Communications Commission Order 20–48.
Sec. 6083. Diesel emissions reduction.
Sec. 6084. Utilizing significant emissions with innovative technologies.
Sec. 6085. Legal assistance for veterans and surviving spouses and dependents.
Sec. 6086. Silver Star Service Banner Day.
Sec. 6087. Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research.
Sec. 6088. Subpoena authority.
Sec. 6089. Thad Cochran headquarters building.
Sec. 6090. Comptroller General of the United States report on handling by Department of Veterans Affairs of disability-related benefits claims by veterans with type 1 diabetes who were exposed to a herbicide agent.
Sec. 6091. Special rules for certain monthly workers’ compensation payments and other payments for Federal Government personnel under chief of mission authority.
Sec. 6094A. Short title.
Sec. 6094B. Report on Federal research and development focused on industries of the future.
Sec. 6094C. Industries of the Future Coordination Council.
Sec. 6096. Short title.
Sec. 6096A. Definitions.
Sec. 6096B. Wireless Emergency Alerts System offerings.
Sec. 6096C. State Emergency Alert System Plans and Emergency Communications Committees.
Sec. 6096D. Integrated public alert and warning system guidance.
Sec. 6096E. False alert reporting.
Sec. 6096F. Repeating Emergency Alert System messages for national security.
Sec. 6096G. Internet and online streaming services emergency alert examination.
Sec. 6211. Congressional oversight of United States talks with Taliban officials and Afghanistan’s comprehensive peace process.
Sec. 6231. Clarification and expansion of sanctions relating to construction of Nord Stream 2 or TurkStream pipeline projects.
Sec. 6235. Sense of Senate on admission of Ukraine to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Enhanced Opportunities Partnership Program.
Sec. 6251. Pilot program to improve cyber cooperation with Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia.
Sec. 6273. Report on risk to personnel, equipment, and operations due to Huawei 5G architecture in host countries.
Sec. 6281. Comparative studies on defense budget transparency of the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the United States.
Sec. 6282. Modification to initiative to support protection of national security academic researchers from undue influence and other security threats.
Sec. 6283. Sense of Senate on United States-Israel cooperation on precision-guided munitions.
Sec. 6284. Blocking deadly fentanyl imports.
Sec. 6286. Establishment of United States-Israel Operations-Technology Working Group.
Sec. 6290. Short title.
Sec. 6290A. Definition.
Sec. 6291. Findings.
Sec. 6292. Statement of policy.
Sec. 6293. Security assistance for Israel.
Sec. 6294. Extension of war reserves stockpile authority.
Sec. 6295. Extension of loan guarantees to Israel.
Sec. 6296. Transfer of precision guided munitions to Israel.
Sec. 6297. Sense of Congress on rapid acquisition and deployment procedures.
Sec. 6298. Eligibility of Israel for the strategic trade authorization exception to certain export control licensing requirements.
Sec. 6299. United States Agency for International Development memoranda of understanding to enhance cooperation with Israel.
Sec. 6299A. Cooperative projects among the United States, Israel, and developing countries.
Sec. 6299B. Joint cooperative program related to innovation and high-tech for the Middle East region.
Sec. 6299C. Sense of Congress on United States-Israel economic cooperation.
Sec. 6299D. Cooperation on directed energy capabilities.
Sec. 6299E. Plans to provide Israel with necessary defense articles and services in a contingency.
Sec. 6299F. Other matters of cooperation.
Sec. 6611. Report on use of encryption by Department of Defense national security systems.
Sec. 6612. Guidance and direction on use of direct hiring processes for artificial intelligence professionals and other data science and software development personnel.
Sec. 6613. Cybersecurity State Coordinator Act.
Sec. 6614. Cybersecurity Advisory Committee.
Sec. 6615. Cybersecurity Education and Training Assistance Program.
Sec. 6651. Report on electromagnetic pulse hardening of ground-based strategic deterrent weapons system.
Sec. 6701. Advanced nuclear reactor research and development goals.
Sec. 6702. Nuclear energy strategic plan.
Sec. 6703. Versatile, reactor-based fast neutron source.
Sec. 6704. Advanced nuclear fuel security program.
Sec. 6705. University Nuclear Leadership Program.
Sec. 6706. Adjusting strategic petroleum reserve mandated drawdowns.
Sec. 7801. Modification to authority for military construction projects for child development centers at military installations.
Sec. 7802. Modification of construction of ground-based strategic deterrent launch facilities and launch centers for the Air Force.
Sec. 7821. Inclusion of assessment of performance metrics in annual publication on use of incentive fees for privatized military housing projects.
Sec. 7861. Establishment of interagency committees on joint use of certain land withdrawn from appropriation under public land laws.
Sec. 7862. Lease extension for Bryan Multi-Sports Complex, Wayne County, North Carolina.
Sec. 7881. Sense of Congress on relocation of Joint Spectrum Center.
Sec. 9001. Short title.
Sec. 9002. Definitions.
Sec. 9101. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 9102. Classified Schedule of Authorizations.
Sec. 9103. Intelligence Community Management Account.
Sec. 9201. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 9301. Restriction on conduct of intelligence activities.
Sec. 9302. Increase in employee compensation and benefits authorized by law.
Sec. 9303. Clarification of authorities and responsibilities of National Manager for National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security.
Sec. 9304. Continuity of operations plans for certain elements of the intelligence community in the case of a national emergency.
Sec. 9305. Application of Executive Schedule level III to position of Director of National Reconnaissance Office.
Sec. 9306. National Intelligence University.
Sec. 9307. Requiring facilitation of establishment of Social Media Data and Threat Analysis Center.
Sec. 9308. Data collection on attrition in intelligence community.
Sec. 9309. Limitation on delegation of responsibility for program management of information-sharing environment.
Sec. 9310. Improvements to provisions relating to intelligence community information technology environment.
Sec. 9311. Requirements and authorities for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency to improve education in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics.
Sec. 9321. Assessment by the Comptroller General of the United States on efforts of the intelligence community and the Department of Defense to identify and mitigate risks posed to the intelligence community and the Department by the use of direct-to-consumer genetic testing by the Government of the People's Republic of China.
Sec. 9322. Report on use by intelligence community of hiring flexibilities and expedited human resources practices to assure quality and diversity in the workforce of the intelligence community.
Sec. 9323. Report on signals intelligence priorities and requirements.
Sec. 9324. Assessment of demand for student loan repayment program benefit.
Sec. 9325. Assessment of intelligence community demand for child care.
Sec. 9326. Open source intelligence strategies and plans for the intelligence community.
Sec. 9401. Exclusivity, consistency, and transparency in security clearance procedures, and right to appeal.
Sec. 9402. Establishing process parity for security clearance revocations.
Sec. 9403. Federal policy on sharing of derogatory information pertaining to contractor employees in the trusted workforce.
Sec. 9501. Report on attempts by foreign adversaries to build telecommunications and cybersecurity equipment and services for, or to provide such equipment and services to, certain allies of the United States.
Sec. 9502. Report on threats posed by use by foreign governments and entities of commercially available cyber intrusion and surveillance technology.
Sec. 9503. Reports on recommendations of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission.
Sec. 9504. Assessment of critical technology trends relating to artificial intelligence, microchips, and semiconductors and related supply chains.
Sec. 9505. Combating Chinese influence operations in the United States and strengthening civil liberties protections.
Sec. 9506. Annual report on corrupt activities of senior officials of the Chinese Communist Party.
Sec. 9507. Report on corrupt activities of Russian and other Eastern European oligarchs.
Sec. 9508. Report on biosecurity risk and disinformation by the Chinese Communist Party and the Government of the People's Republic of China.
Sec. 9509. Report on effect of lifting of United Nations arms embargo on Islamic Republic of Iran.
Sec. 9510. Report on Iranian activities relating to nuclear nonproliferation.
Sec. 9511. Sense of Congress on Third Option Foundation.
In this Act, the term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this Act, jointly submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Budget Committees, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage in the House acting first on the conference report or amendment between the Houses.
(a) Assessment by Secretary of the Army.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall conduct a classified assessment of the capability and capacity of current and planned integrated air and missile defense (IAMD) capabilities to meet combatant commander requirements for major operations against great-power competitors and other global operations in support of the National Defense Strategy.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(B) Analysis of current and planned integrated air and missile defense capabilities to counter the threats analyzed and characterized under subparagraph (A), including the following:
(C) Analysis of current and planned capacity to meet major contingency plan requirements and ongoing global operations of the combatant commands, including the following:
(D) Assessment of integrated air and missile defense architecture and enabling command and control systems, including the following:
(E) Assessment of proponency within the Army of integrated air and missile defense and counter unmanned aerial systems, including the following:
(3) CHARACTERIZATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out paragraph (2)(A), the Secretary shall avoid broad characterizations that do not sufficiently distinguish between distinctly different threats in the same general class.
(B) EXAMPLE.—An example of a broad characterization to be avoided under such paragraph is “cruise missiles”, since such characterization does not sufficiently distinguish between current cruise missiles and emerging hypersonic cruise missiles, which may require different capabilities to counter them.
(4) REPORT AND INTERIM BRIEFING.—
(b) Review by Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.—
(1) REVIEW.—The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall review the assessment being conducted under subsection (a)(1) for potential gaps in capability and capacity to meet requirements of the National Defense Strategy.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than April 15, 2021, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the finding of the Vice Chairman with respect to the review conducted under paragraph (1).
(a) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than August 15, 2021, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) subsequent to the completion of operational testing.
(b) Limitation on use of funds.—Not more than 50 percent of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for procurement of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System may be obligated or expended until the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report required under subsection (a).
(a) Plan.—Not later than January 15, 2021, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan, including a timeline, to operationally deploy or forward station the two batteries of interim cruise missile defense capability procured pursuant to section 112 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1660) in an operational theater or theaters.
(b) Modification of waiver.—Section 112(b)(4) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1661) is amended to read as follows:
“(4) WAIVER.—The Secretary of the Army may waive the deadlines specified in paragraph (1):
“(A) For the deadline specified in paragraph (1)(A), if the Secretary determines that sufficient funds have not been appropriated to enable the Secretary to meet such deadline.
(a) Contract authority.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract, beginning with fiscal year 2021, for the procurement of up to two Columbia-class submarines.
(b) Incremental funding.—With respect to a contract entered into under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy may use incremental funding to make payments under the contract.
(a) Milestone B approval requirements.—Milestone B approval may not be granted for a covered program unless such program accomplishes prior to and incorporates into such approval—
(1) qualification by the Senior Technical Authority of—
(b) Qualification requirements.—The qualification required in subsection (a)(1) shall include a land-based operational demonstration of such equipment in the vessel-representative form, fit, and function for not less than 1,080 continuous hours without preventative maintenance, corrective maintenance, emergent repair, or any other form of repair or maintenance.
(c) Requirement to use qualified engines and generators.—The Secretary of the Navy shall require that covered programs use only main propulsion engines and electrical generators that are qualified under subsection (a)(1).
(d) Limitation.—The Secretary of the Navy may not release a detail design or construction request for proposals or obligate funds from a procurement account for a covered program until such program receives Milestone B approval and the milestone decision authority notifies the congressional defense committees, in writing, of the actions taken to comply with the requirements under this section.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) The term “Milestone B approval” has the meaning given the term in section 2366(e)(7) of title 10, United States Code.
Section 130(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1665), as amended by section 126 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “for fiscal year 2019 or fiscal year 2020” and inserting “for fiscal years 2019, 2020, or 2021”.
(a) Contract authority.—
(b) Certification required.—A contract may not be entered into under subsection (a) unless the Secretary of the Navy certifies to the congressional defense committees, in writing, not later than 30 days before entry into the contract, each of the following, which shall be prepared by the milestone decision authority for such programs:
(1) The use of such a contract is consistent with the Department of the Navy’s projected force structure requirements for amphibious ships.
(2) The use of such a contract will result in significant savings compared to the total anticipated costs of carrying out the program through annual contracts. In certifying cost savings under the preceding sentence, the Secretary shall include a written explanation of—
(A) the estimated end cost and appropriated funds by fiscal year, by hull, without the authority provided in subsection (a);
(B) the estimated end cost and appropriated funds by fiscal year, by hull, with the authority provided in subsection (a);
(3) There is a reasonable expectation that throughout the contemplated contract period the Secretary of the Navy will request funding for the contract at the level required to avoid contract cancellation.
(4) There is a stable design for the property to be acquired and the technical risks associated with such property are not excessive.
(5) The estimates of both the cost of the contract and the anticipated cost avoidance through the use of a contract authorized under subsection (a) are realistic.
(7) During the fiscal year in which such contract is to be awarded, sufficient funds will be available to perform the contract in such fiscal year, and the future-years defense program (as defined under section 221 of title 10, United States Code) for such fiscal year will include the funding required to execute the program without cancellation.
(c) Authority for advance procurement.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into one or more contracts for advance procurement associated with a vessel or vessels for which authorization to enter into a contract is provided under subsection (a), and for systems and subsystems associated with such vessels in economic order quantities when cost savings are achievable.
(a) Report required.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report with a fighter force structure acquisition strategy that is aligned with the results of the independent studies required under section 1064 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1576).The strategy shall establish a minimum number of F–35 and Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) aircraft that the Navy and Marine Corps would be required to purchase each year to mitigate or manage strike fighter shortfalls.
A procurement quantity of a system authorized by Congress in a National Defense Authorization Act for a given fiscal year that is subsequently appropriated by Congress in an amount greater than the quantity of such system included in the President’s annual budget request submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for such fiscal year shall not be included as a new procurement quantity in future annual budget requests.
(a) Report.—Not later than May 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Navy, in consultation with the Chief of Naval Operations and Commandant of the Marine Corps, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the optimal composition of the carrier air wing in 2030 and 2040, as well as alternative force design concepts.
(a) Report.—Not later than July 30, 2021, the Secretary of the Navy, in consultation with the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, shall submit to the congressional defense committees report with a strategy to ensure full spectrum electromagnetic superiority using the ALQ–249 Next Generation Jammer.
(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1) A description of the current procurement strategy of the ALQ–249 and the analysis of its capability to meet the RF frequency ranges required in a National Defense Strategy (NDS) conflict.
(a) Authority for advance procurement and economic order quantity.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2020 program year, for the procurement of economic order quantities of material and equipment for the F–35 aircraft program for use in procurement contracts to be awarded for such program during fiscal years 2021 through 2023.
(b) Limitation.—The total amount obligated in fiscal year 2021 under all contracts entered into under subsection (a) shall not exceed $493,000,000.
(c) Preliminary findings.—Before entering into a contract under subsection (a), the Secretary shall make each of the following findings with respect to such contract:
(1) The use of such a contract will result in significant savings of the total anticipated costs of carrying out the program through annual contracts.
(2) The minimum need for the property to be procured is expected to remain substantially unchanged during the contemplated contract period in terms of production rate, procurement rate, and total quantities.
(3) There is a reasonable expectation that, throughout the contemplated contract period, the Secretary will request funding for the contract at the level required to avoid contract cancellation.
(4) There is a stable design for the property to be procured, and the technical risks associated with such property are not excessive.
(d) Certification requirement.—Except as provided in subsection (e), the Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract under subsection (a) until 30 days after the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees, in writing, that each of the following conditions is satisfied:
(1) A sufficient number of end items of the system being acquired under such contract have been delivered at or within the most recently available estimates of the program acquisition unit cost or procurement unit cost for such system to determine that the estimates of the unit costs are realistic.
(2) During the fiscal year in which such contract is to be awarded, sufficient funds will be available to perform the contract in such fiscal year, and the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, for that fiscal year will include the funding required to execute the program without cancellation.
(4) The proposed contract provides for production at not less than minimum economic rates given the existing tooling and facilities.
(e) Exception.—Notwithstanding subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may enter into a contract under subsection (a) on or after December 1, 2020, if—
(1) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation has not completed a cost analysis of the preliminary findings made by the Secretary under subsection (c) with respect to the contract;
(a) Minimum levels.—Except as provided under subsection (b), the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain the following minima, based on Primary Mission Aircraft Inventory (PMAI):
(b) Exceptions.—The Secretary of the Air Force may reduce the number of aircraft in the PMAI of the Air Force below the minima specified in subsection (a) only if—
As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of the Air Force shall seek to achieve a minimum of not fewer than 386 available operational squadrons, or equivalent organizational units, within the Air Force. In addition to the operational squadrons, the Secretary shall strive to achieve the following primary mission aircraft inventory (PMAI) numbers:
The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees recommendations for a minimum number of bomber aircraft, including penetrating bombers in addition to B–52H aircraft, to enable the Air Force to carry out its long-range penetrating strike capability.
The Secretary of the Air Force shall begin the procurement process for an alternate 25mm ammunition solution that provides a true full-spectrum target engagement capability for the F–35A aircraft.
No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended for the Close Air Support Integration Group (CIG) or its subordinate units at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, and the Air Force may not utilize personnel or equipment in support of the CIG or its subordinate units.
The Secretary of Defense may not divest KC–10 and KC–135 aircraft in excess of the following amounts:
(a) Limitation.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not take any action that would prevent the Air Force from maintaining the fleets of U–2 aircraft or RQ–4 aircraft in their current, or improved, configurations and capabilities until the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council certifies in writing to the appropriate committees of Congress that the capability to be fielded at the same time or before the retirement of the U–2 aircraft or RQ–4 aircraft (as the case may be) would result in equal or greater capability available to the commanders of the combatant commands and would not result in less capacity available to the commanders of the combatant commands.
(b) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the certification requirement under subsection (a) with respect to U–2 aircraft or RQ–4 aircraft if the Secretary—
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not divest F–15C aircraft in the European theater until the F–15EX aircraft is integrated into the Air Force and has begun bed down actions in the European theater.
(b) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Commander of the United States European Command (EUCOM), may waive the limitation under subsection (a) if the Secretary certifies to Congress the divestment is required for the national defense and that there exists sufficient resources at all times to meet NATO and EUCOM air superiority requirements for the European theater.
(a) Strategy required.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force (CSAF), in consultation with the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA), shall submit to the congressional defense committees a development and acquisition strategy to procure a capability to protect air bases and prepositioned sites in contested environments highlighted in the National Defense Strategy. The strategy should ensure a solution that is effective against current and emerging cruise missile and advanced hypersonic missile threats.
(b) Limitation on use of operation and maintenance funds.—Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for operation and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force and the Office of the Secretary of the Army may be obligated or expended until 15 days after submission of the strategy required under subsection (a).
The Secretary of the Air Force shall develop and implement a complete, one-time solution to the KC–46 aircraft remote visual system (RVS) operational limitations. Not later than October 1, 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees an implementation strategy for the solution.
(a) Analysis.—Not later than April 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force, in consultation with the commanders of the combatant commands, shall develop an analysis of current and future moving target indicator requirements across the combatant commands and operational and tactical level command and control capabilities the Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) will require when fielded.
(b) JROC requirements.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the Secretary of the Air Force develops the analysis under subsection (a), the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) shall certify that requirements for ABMS incorporate the findings of the analysis.
(2) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) shall notify the congressional defense committees upon making the certification required under paragraph (1) and provide a briefing on the requirements and findings described in such paragraph not later than 30 days after such notification.
(a) In general.—Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide for the performance of two independent studies to devise new measures to assess cost-per-effect for key mission areas. One of the studies shall be conducted by an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code, and one of the studies shall be conducted by a federally funded research and development center.
(b) Scope.—Each study conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall address the following matters:
(3) Associated operation and maintenance costs necessary to facilitate respective operational constructs.
Not later than October 1, 2020, the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall—
The Secretary of Defense may not during fiscal year 2021 divest or retire any A–10 aircraft, in order to ensure ongoing capabilities to counter violent extremism and provide close air support and combat search and rescue in accordance with the National Defense Strategy.
(a) In general.—Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 231 the following new section:
Ҥ 231a. Budgeting for life-cycle cost of aircraft for the Navy, Army, and Air Force: Annual plan and certification
“(a) Annual aircraft procurement plan and certification.—Not later than 45 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees—
“(1) a plan for the procurement of the aircraft specified in subsection (b) for the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Army, and the Department of the Air Force developed in accordance with this section; and
“(2) a certification by the Secretary that both the budget for such fiscal year and the future years defense program submitted to Congress in relation to such budget under section 221 of this title provide for funding of the procurement of aircraft at a level that is sufficient for the procurement of the aircraft provided for in the plan under paragraph (1) on the schedule provided in the plan.
“(c) Annual aircraft procurement plan.— (1) The annual aircraft procurement plan developed for a fiscal year for purposes of subsection (a)(1) should be designed so that the aviation force provided for under the plan is capable of supporting the national military strategy of the United States as set forth in the most recent National Defense Strategy submitted under section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code, and National Military Strategy submitted under section 153(b) of title 10, United States Code.
“(2) Each annual aircraft procurement plan shall include the following:
“(A) A detailed program for the procurement of the aircraft specified in subsection (b) for each of the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Army, and the Department of the Air Force over the next 30 fiscal years.
“(B) A description of the necessary aviation force structure to meet the requirements of the national military strategy of the United States or the most recent Quadrennial Defense Review, whichever is applicable under paragraph (1).
“(C) The estimated levels of annual investment funding necessary to carry out each aircraft program, together with a discussion of the procurement strategies on which such estimated levels of annual investment funding are based, set forth in aggregate for the Department of Defense and in aggregate for each military department.
“(D) The estimated level of annual funding necessary to operate, maintain, sustain, and support each aircraft program throughout the life-cycle of the program, set forth in aggregate for the Department of Defense and in aggregate for each military department.
“(E) For each of the cost estimates required by subparagraphs (C) and (D)—
“(i) a description of whether the cost estimate is derived from the cost estimate position of the military department or derived from the cost estimate position of the Office of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation;
“(ii) if the cost estimate position of the military department and the cost estimate position of the Office of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation differ by more than 5 percent for any aircraft program, an annotated cost estimate difference and sufficient rationale to explain the difference;
“(3) For any cost estimate required by paragraph (2)(C) or (D), for any aircraft program for which the Secretary is required to include in a report under section 2432 of this title, the source of the cost information used to prepare the annual aircraft plan, shall be sourced from the Selected Acquisition Report data that the Secretary plans to submit to the congressional defense committees in accordance with subsection (f) of that section for the year for which the annual aircraft plan is prepared.
“(d) Assessment when aircraft procurement budget is insufficient to meet applicable requirements.—If the budget for a fiscal year provides for funding of the procurement of aircraft for the Department of the Navy, the Department of the Army, or the Department of the Air Force at a level that is not sufficient to sustain the aviation force structure specified in the aircraft procurement plan for such Department for that fiscal year under subsection (a), the Secretary shall include with the defense budget materials for that fiscal year an assessment that describes and discusses the risks associated with the reduced force structure of aircraft that will result from funding aircraft procurement at such level. The assessment shall be coordinated in advance with the commanders of the combatant commands.
“(e) Annual report on aircraft inventory.— (1) As part of the annual plan and certification required to be submitted under this section, the Secretary shall include a report on the aircraft in the inventory of the Department of Defense. Each such report shall include the following, for the year covered by the report:
“(B) The total number of the aircraft in the inventory that are active, stated in the following categories (with appropriate subcategories for mission aircraft, training aircraft, dedicated test aircraft, and other aircraft):
“(C) The total number of the aircraft in the inventory that are inactive, stated in the following categories:
“(2) Each report submitted under this subsection shall set forth each item described in paragraph (1) separately for the regular component of each armed force and for each reserve component of each armed force and, for each such component, shall set forth each type, model, and series of aircraft provided for in the future-years defense program that covers the fiscal year for which the budget accompanying the plan, certification and report is submitted.
The Secretary of the Air Force is authorized to utilize, modify, and operate the 6 F–35 aircraft that were accepted by the Government of Turkey but never delivered because Turkey was suspended from the F–35 program.
(a) Transfer.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and subject to subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall transition to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as a Chairman's Controlled Activity all of the responsibilities and functions of the Commander of United States Strategic Command that are germane to electromagnetic spectrum operations, including—
(b) Responsibility of Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff as the Electronic Warfare Senior Designated Official.—The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as the Electronic Warfare Senior Designated Official, shall be responsible for the following:
(1) Executing the functions transitioned to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under subsection (a).
(2) Overseeing, with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the development and implementation of the Electromagnetic Spectrum Superiority Strategy of the Department of Defense and subsequent Department-wide electromagnetic spectrum and electronic warfare strategies.
(3) Managing the Joint Electronic Warfare Center and the Joint Electromagnetic Preparedness for Advanced Combat organizations.
(4) Overseeing, through the Joint Requirements Oversight Council and the Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations cross-functional team, the acquisition activities of the military services as they relate to electromagnetic spectrum operations.
(5) Overseeing and, as appropriate, setting standards for the individual and unit training programs of the military services and the joint training and mission rehearsal programs of the combatant commands as they relate to electromagnetic spectrum operations.
(6) Overseeing the development of tactics, techniques, and procedures germane to electromagnetic spectrum operations.
(7) Overseeing the integration of electromagnetic spectrum operations into operation plans and contingency plans.
(8) Developing and integrating into the joint warfighting concept operational concepts for electromagnetic spectrum operations, including the following:
(A) The roles and responsibilities of each of the military services and their primary contributions to the joint force.
(B) The primary targets for offensive electromagnetic spectrum operations and their alignment to the military services and relevant capabilities.
(c) Period of effect of transfer.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The transfer required by subsection (a) and the responsibilities specified in subsection (b) shall remain in effect until such date as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff considers appropriate, except that such date shall not be earlier than the date that is 180 days after the date on which the Chairman submits to the congressional defense committees notice that—
(2) ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENT DESCRIBED.—An alternative arrangement described in this paragraph is an arrangement in which certain oversight, advocacy, and coordination functions allotted to the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by subsections (a) and (b) are performed either by a single combatant command or by the individual geographic and functional combatant commands responsible for executing electromagnetic spectrum operations with long-term supervision by the Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
(d) Evaluations of armed forces.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, and the Chief of Space Operations shall each conduct and complete an evaluation of the armed forces for their respective military services and their ability to perform the electromagnetic spectrum operations missions required of them in—
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each evaluation under paragraph (1) shall include assessment of the following:
(A) Current programs of record, including—
(e) Evaluation of combatant commands.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commander of the United States European Command, the Commander of the United States Pacific Command, and the Commander of the United States Central Command shall each conduct and complete an evaluation of the plans and posture of their respective commands to execute the electromagnetic spectrum operations envisioned in—
(f) Semiannual briefing.—Not less frequently than twice each year until January 1, 2026, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall brief the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on the implementation of this section by each of the Joint Staff, the military services, and the combatant commands.
(a) Cryptographic modernization schedules required.—Each of the Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of relevant defense agencies and field activities shall establish and maintain a cryptographic modernization schedule that specifies, for each pertinent weapon system, command and control system, or data link, including those that use commercial encryption technologies, as relevant, the following:
(b) Requirements for Chief Information Officer.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall—
(1) oversee the construction and implementation of the cryptographic modernization schedules required by subsection (a);
(2) establish and maintain an integrated cryptographic modernization schedule for the entire Department, collating the cryptographic modernization schedules required under subsection (a); and
(3) in coordination with the Director of the National Security Agency and the Joint Staff Director for Command, Control, Communications, and Computers/Cyber, use the budget certification, standard-setting, and policy-making authorities provided in section 142 of title 10, United States Code, to amend military service and defense agency and field activity plans for key extension requests and cryptographic modernization funding and deployment that pose unacceptable risk to military operations.
(c) Annual notices.—Not later than January 1, 2022, and not less frequently than once each year thereafter until January 1, 2026, the Chief Information Officer of the Department and the Joint Staff Director for Command, Control, Communications, and Computers/Cyber shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees notification of all—
The Secretary of the Air Force may not purchase any aircraft for the Air Force Special Operations Command for the purpose of “armed overwatch” until such time as the Chief of Staff of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that general purpose forces of the Air Force do not have the skill or capacity to provide close air support and armed overwatch to United States forces deployed operationally.
(a) Prohibition.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the Department of Defense may be used to acquire armed overwatch aircraft for the United States Special Operations Command, and the Department of Defense may not acquire armed overwatch aircraft for the United States Special Operations Command in fiscal year 2021.
(b) Analysis required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than July 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict and the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, shall conduct an analysis to define the special operations-peculiar requirements for armed overwatch aircraft and to determine whether acquisition of a new special operations-peculiar platform is the most cost effective means of fulfilling such requirements.
(2) ELEMENTS.—At a minimum, the analysis of alternatives required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) a description of the concept of operations for employing armed overwatch aircraft in support of ground forces;
(C) an identification of the most likely antiaircraft threats in geographic areas where armed overwatch aircraft will be deployed and possible countermeasures to defeat such threats;
(D) a defined requirement for special operations-peculiar armed overwatch aircraft, including an identification of threshold and objective performance parameters for armed overwatch aircraft;
(E) an analysis of alternatives comparing various manned and unmanned aircraft in the current aircraft inventory of the United States Special Operations Command and a new platform for meeting requirements for the armed overwatch mission, including for each alternative considered;
(I) an explanation of how the acquisition of a new armed overwatch aircraft would impact the overall fleet of special operations-peculiar aircraft and the availability of aircrews and maintainers;
Not later than October 1, 2020, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in consultation with the F–35 Program Executive Officer, shall—
(1) submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing a program-wide process for measuring, collecting, and tracking information on how the Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS) is affecting the performance of the F–35 fleet, including its effects on mission capability rates; and
(a) In general.—When the Department of Defense contracts for aviation services to be performed in a foreign country, or in airspace, in which a Special Federal Aviation Regulation issued by the Federal Aviation Administration would preclude operation of such aviation services by an air carrier or commercial operator of the United States, the Secretary of Defense (or a designee of the Secretary) shall—
(1) obtain approval from the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (or a designee of the Administrator) for the air carrier or commercial operator of the United States to deviate from the Special Federal Aviation Regulation to the extent necessary to perform such aviation services;
(b) Construction of designation.—The designation of aircraft of an air carrier or commercial operator of the United States as State Aircraft of the United States under subsection (a)(2) shall have no effect on Federal Aviation Administration requirements for—
The Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy shall qualify and certify, for the use of United States forces, additional munitions on the F–35 aircraft that are already qualified on NATO member F–35 partner aircraft.
(a) In general.—Not later than December 1, 2021, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict and the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees an acquisition roadmap to meet the manned and unmanned airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements of United States Special Operations Forces.
(b) Elements.—The roadmap required under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) A description of the current platform requirements for manned and unmanned airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities to support United States Special Operations Forces.
(2) An analysis of the remaining service life of existing manned and unmanned airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities currently operated by United States Special Operations Forces.
(4) A description of the future manned and unmanned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platform requirements of the United States Special Operations Forces, including range, payload, endurance, ability to operate in contested environments, and other requirements as appropriate.
(5) An explanation of the anticipated mix of manned and unmanned aircraft, number of platforms, and associated aircrew and maintainers.
(6) An explanation of the extent to which service-provided manned and unmanned airborne intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities will be required in support of United States Special Operations Forces and how such capabilities will supplement and integrate with the organic capabilities possessed by United States Special Operations Forces.
(a) Priority objectives for Executive Agent for C–UAS.—The Executive Agent of the Joint Counter Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-sUAS) Office, as designated by the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition and Sustainment, shall prioritize the following objectives:
(b) Fielding C–UAS systems in fiscal year 2021.—Pursuant to subsection (a)(1), the Executive Agent shall prioritize the selection of counter unmanned aerial systems that can be fielded in fiscal year 2021 with specific emphasis on systems that—
(c) Near-term development plan.—The plan for the near-term development of counter unmanned aerial systems prioritized under subsection (a)(2) shall ensure, at a minimum, that the development of such systems—
(1) builds, as much as practicable, upon systems that were selected for fielding in fiscal year 2021 and the criteria prioritized for their selection, as specified in subsection (b);
(2) reduces or accelerates the timeline for initial operational capability and full operational capability;
(3) utilizes a software-defined, family-of-systems approach that enables the flexible and continuous integration of different types of sensors and mitigation solutions based on the different demands of particular military installations and deployed forces, physical geographies, and threat profiles; and
(d) Briefing.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Executive Agent shall brief the congressional defense committees on the selection process for counter unmanned aerial systems capabilities prioritized under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) and the plan prioritized under paragraph (2) of such subsection.
(a) Production of requirements by Joint Requirements Oversight Council.—Not later than October 1, 2020, the Joint Requirements and Oversight Council (JROC) shall produce requirements for the Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) program.
(b) Air Force certification.—Immediately after the certification of requirements produced under subsection (a), the Chief of Staff of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification that the current JADC2 effort, including programmatic and architecture efforts, being led by the Air Force will meet the requirements laid out by the JROC.
(c) Certification by other services.— Not later than January 1, 2021, the chief of each other military service shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification whether that service's efforts on multi-domain command and control are compatible with the Air Force-led JADC2 architecture.
(a) Designation of senior officials.—The Under Secretary for Research and Engineering shall designate a set of senior officials to coordinate research and engineering in such technology areas as the Under Secretary considers critical for the support of the National Defense Strategy.
(b) Duties.—The duties of the senior officials designated under subsection (a) shall include, within their respective technology areas—
(1) developing and continuously updating research and technology development roadmaps, associated funding strategies, and associated technology transition strategies to ensure effective and efficient development of new capabilities and operational use of appropriate technologies;
(2) annual assessments of workforce, infrastructure, and industrial base capabilities and capacity to support the roadmaps developed under paragraph (1) and the goals of the National Defense Strategy;
(3) reviewing the relevant research and engineering budgets of appropriate organizations within the Department of Defense, including the military services, and advising the Under Secretary on—
(c) Annual reports.—
(d) Coordination of research and engineering activities.—The Service Acquisition Executive for each military services and the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency shall each identify senior officials to ensure coordination of appropriate research and engineering activities with each of the senior officials designated under subsection (a).
(a) In general.—In carrying out the responsibilities established in section 142 of title 10, United States Code, the Chief Information Officer (CIO) of the Department of Defense shall—
(b) Responsibilities.—The Chief Information Officer shall have, with respect to authorities referenced in subsection (a), the following responsibilities:
(c) Cross-functional team for fifth-generation wireless networking.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in accordance with section 911(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 111 note), establish a cross-functional team for fifth-generation wireless networking in order—
(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the cross-functional team established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be the—
(A) oversight of the implementation of the strategy developed as required by section 254 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) for harnessing fifth-generation wireless networking technologies, coordinated across all relevant elements of the Department;
(B) coordination of research and development, implementation and acquisition activities, warfighting concept development, spectrum policy, industrial policy and commercial outreach and partnership relating to fifth-generation wireless networking in the Department, and interagency and international engagement;
(d) Roles and responsibilities.—The Secretary of Defense, through the cross-functional team established under subsection (c), shall define the roles of the organizations within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense intelligence components, military services, defense agencies and field activities, combatant commands, and the Joint Staff, for fifth-generation wireless networking policy and programs within the Department.
(e) Briefing.—Not later than March 15, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the establishment of the cross-functional team pursuant to subsection (c) and the roles and responsibilities defined pursuant to subsection (d).
(f) Rule of construction.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as providing the Chief Information Officer immediate responsibility for the Department’s activities in fifth-generation wireless networking experimentation and science and technology development.
(2) PURVIEW OF EXPERIMENTATION AND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.—The activities described in paragraph (1) shall remain within the purview of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, but shall inform and be informed by the activities of the cross-functional team established pursuant to subsection (c).
(a) Identification of use cases.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through such officers and employees of the Department of Defense as the Secretary considers appropriate, including the chief data officers and chief management officers of the military departments, shall identify a set of no fewer than five use cases of the application of existing artificial intelligence enabled systems to support improved management of enterprise acquisition, personnel, audit, or financial management functions, or other appropriate management functions, that are consistent with reform efforts that support the National Defense Strategy.
(b) Prototyping activities aligned to use cases.—The Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and in coordination with the Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center and such other officers and employees as the Secretary considers appropriate, shall pilot technology development and prototyping activities that leverage commercially available technologies and systems to demonstrate new artificial intelligence enabled capabilities to support the use cases identified under subsection (a).
(a) Extension of pilot program for the enhancement of the research, development, test, and evaluation centers of the Department of Defense.—Section 233(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking “September 30, 2022” and inserting “September 30, 2025”.
(b) Extension of pilot program to improve incentives for technology transfer from Department of Defense laboratories.—Subsection (e) of section 233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2514 note) is amended to read as follows:
Section 234 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note), as amended by section 220 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e):
“(e) Use of quantum computing capabilities.—The Secretary of each military department shall—
“(1) develop and annually update a list of technical problems and research challenges which are likely to be addressable by quantum computers available for use within in the next one to three years, with a priority for technical problems and challenges where quantum computing systems have performance advantages over traditional computing systems, in order to enhance the capabilities of such quantum computers and support the addressing of relevant technical problems and research challenges; and
“(2) establish programs and enter into agreements with appropriate medium and small businesses with functional quantum computing capabilities to provide such private sector capabilities to government, industry, and academic researchers working on relevant technical problems and research activities.”.
(a) Program required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a program to provide part-time or term employment in Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratories for—
(b) Number of positions.—
(c) Selection.—The Secretary, acting through the directors of the laboratories described in subsection (a), shall select faculty described in paragraph (1) of such subsection for participation in the program established under such subsection on the basis of—
(d) Authorities.—In carrying out the program established under subsection (a), the Secretary and the directors of the laboratories described in such subsection may—
(1) use any hiring authority available to the Secretary or the directors, including any authority available under a laboratory demonstration program, direct hiring authority under section 1599h of title 10, United States Code, and expert hiring authority under section 3109 of title 5, United States Code;
(2) utilize cooperative research and development agreements under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a) to enable sharing of research and expertise with institutions of higher education and the private sector; and
(e) Annual reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and not less frequently than once each year thereafter until the date that is three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the program established under subsection (a).
(2) CONTENTS OF FIRST REPORT.—The first report submitted under paragraph (1) shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(f) Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratory defined.—In this section, the term “Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratory” means the entities designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note).
(a) Modification regarding basic pay.—Subsection (a)(4)(A) of section 235 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall research, develop, and deploy advanced technologies that support water sustainment with technologies that capture ambient humidity and harvest, recycle, and reuse water.
(b) Goal.—Under subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek to develop water systems that reduce weight and logistics support and transition such advanced technologies for use by expeditionary forces by January 1, 2025.
(d) Partnerships and existing techniques and technologies.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek—
(e) Commercial off-the-shelf technologies.—In carrying out subsection (a), in addition to technology described in such subsection, the Secretary shall consider using commercial off-the-shelf technologies for cost savings and near ready deployment technologies to enable warfighters to be more self-sufficient.
(a) Sense of Congress on hypersonic capabilities.—It is the sense of Congress that development of hypersonic capabilities is a key element of the National Defense Strategy.
(b) Improving ground-based test facilities.—The Secretary of Defense shall take such actions as may be necessary to improve ground-based test facilities for the development of hypersonic capabilities, such as improving wind tunnels.
(c) Increasing flight test rate.—The Secretary shall increase the flight test rate to expedite the maturation and fielding of hypersonic technologies.
(d) Strategy and plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than December 30, 2020, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, in consultation with the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, shall submit to the congressional defense committees an executable strategy and plan to field air-launched and air-breathing hypersonic weapons capability before the date that is three years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Disclosure requirements.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2374b. Disclosure requirements for recipients of research and development grants
“ An individual or entity (including a State or local government) that receives Department of Defense grant funds for research and development shall clearly state in any statement, press release, or other document describing the program, project, or activity funded through such grant funds, other than a communication containing not more than 280 characters, the dollar amount of Department grant funds made available for the program, project, or activity.”.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“2374b. Disclosure requirements for recipients of research and development grants.”.
(a) Assessment and comparison required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, shall conduct an assessment and direct comparison of capabilities in emerging biotechnologies for national security purposes, including applications in material, manufacturing, and health, between the capabilities of the United States and the capabilities of adversaries of the United States.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment and comparison carried out under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An evaluation of the quantity, quality, and progress of United States fundamental and applied research for emerging biotechnology initiatives for national security purposes.
(B) An assessment of the resourcing of United States efforts to harness emerging biotechnology capabilities for national security purposes, including the supporting facilities, test infrastructure, and workforce.
(C) An intelligence assessment of adversary emerging biotechnology capabilities and research as well as an assessment of adversary intent and willingness to use emerging biotechnologies for national security purposes.
(D) An assessment of the analytic and operational subject matter expertise necessary to assess rapidly-evolving foreign military developments in biotechnology, and the current state of the workforce in the intelligence community
(b) Report.—
(c) Definition of intelligence community.—In this subsection, the term “intelligence community” has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(a) Agreement.—
(b) Review.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Under an agreement between the Secretary and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine under this section, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall carry out a comparative analysis of efforts by China and the United States Government to recruit and retain domestic and foreign researchers and develop recommendations for the Department of Defense.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The comparative analysis carried out under paragraph (1) and the recommendations developed under such paragraph shall include the following:
(A) A list of the “talent programs” used by China and a list of the incentive programs used by the United States to recruit and retain relevant researchers.
(B) The types of researchers, scientists, other technical experts, and fields targeted by each talent program listed under subparagraph (A).
(C) The number of researchers in academia, the Department of Defense Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories, and national security science and engineering programs of the National Nuclear Security Administration targeted by the talent programs listed under subparagraph (A).
(D) The number of personnel currently participating in the talent programs listed under subparagraph (A) and the number of researchers currently participating in the incentive programs listed under such subparagraph.
(E) The incentives offered by each of the talent programs listed under subparagraph (A) and a description of the incentives offered through incentive programs under such subparagraph to recruit and retain researchers, scientists, and other technical experts.
(F) A characterization of the national security, economic, and scientific benefits China gains through the talent programs listed under subparagraph (A) and a description of similar gains accrued to the United States through incentive programs listed under such subparagraph.
(G) A list of findings and recommendations relating to policies that can be implemented by the United States, especially the Department of Defense, to improve the relative effectiveness of United States activities to recruit and retain researchers, scientists, and other technical experts relative to China.
(c) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the execution of an agreement under subsection (a), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine with respect to the review carried out under this section and the recommendations developed under this section.
(a) Demonstration required.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a demonstration to demonstrate the maturity, performance, and cost of covered technologies in order to provide additional options for providers of fifth-generation (5G) wireless networking services.
(b) Covered technologies.—For purposes of this section, a covered technology is—
(a) Agreement.—
(b) Independent technical review.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Under an agreement between the Secretary and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine under subsection (a), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall carry out an independent technical review of the Order and Authorization adopted by the Federal Communications Commission on April 19, 2020 (FCC 20–48), to the extent that such order and authorization affects the devices, operations, or activities of the Department of Defense.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The independent technical review carried out under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) Comparison of the two different approaches on which the Commission relied for the order and authorized described in paragraph (1) to evaluate the potential harmful interference concerns relating to Global Positioning System devices, with a recommendation on which method most effectively mitigates risks of harmful interference with Global Positioning System devices of the Department, or relating to or with the potential to affect the operations and activities of the Department.
(B) Assessment of the potential for harmful interference to mobile satellite services, including commercial services and Global Positioning System services of the Department, or relating to or with the potential to affect the operations and activities of the Department.
(C) Review of the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures relating to, or with the potential to affect, the devices, operations, or activities of the Department.
(c) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Under an agreement between the Secretary and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine under subsection (a), the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall, not later than nine months after the date of the execution of such agreement, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the findings of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine with respect to the independent technical review carried out under subsection (b) and the recommendations developed pursuant to such review.
(a) Report required.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the micro nuclear reactor programs of the Department of Defense.
(b) Contents.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Potential operational uses on United States and non-United States territory, including both mobile and fixed systems.
(2) Cost and schedule estimates for each new or ongoing program to reach initial operational capability, including the timeline for transition of any program currently funded using defense-wide funds to one or more military services and the identified transition partner in such military services.
(3) In consultation with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense programs, an assessment of physical security requirements for use of such reactors on domestic military installations and non-United States nondomestic installations or locations, including fully permissive, semi-permissive, and remote environments, including a preliminary design basis threat analysis.
(4) In coordination with the Secretary of State—
(A) an assessment of any agreements or changes to agreements that would be required for use of such reactors on non-United States territory;
(5) In coordination with the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a summary of licensing requirements for operation of such systems on United States territory.
(6) A summary of requirements pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for development and operation on United States territory.
(7) In consultation with the General Counsel of the Department of Defense, an assessment of any issues relating to indemnification for operation on United States or non-United States territory and any other relevant legal matters.
(8) In coordination with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy, a determination of whether development, production, and deployment of such systems would require unobligated enriched uranium fuel.
(9) If the determination in paragraph (8) is that unobligated fuel would be required, in coordination with the Administrator for Nuclear Security, an assessment of the availability of such unobligated enriched uranium fuel, by year, for the estimated life of the program, considered with other United States Government demands for such fuel, including tritium production, naval nuclear propulsion, and medical isotope production.
(c) Consultation.—In addition to consultation and coordination required under subsection (b), the Secretary shall, in producing the report required by subsection (a), consult with the Secretary of the Army, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, and such other officials as the Secretary considers necessary.
(d) Form.—The report submitted under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Timing and coverage of plan.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section, as amended by subsection (a)(2), is further amended—
(c) Amendment to contents of plan.—Subsection (d)(2) of such section, as amended by subsection (a)(2), is further amended—
(d) Annual update to plan.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(5) (A) In addition to the quadrennial strategic plan completed under paragraph (1), the Director of the Department of Defense Test Resource Management Center shall also complete an annual update to the quadrennial strategic plan.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 by section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation may be used for the award of a contract for a covered vessel until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering submits to the congressional defense committees a report and certification described in subsection (c) for such contract and covered vessel.
(c) Report and certification described.—A report and certification described in this subsection regarding a contract for a covered vessel is—
(1) a report—
(2) a certification, submitted to the congressional defense committees with the report described in paragraph (1), that certifies that—
(A) the Under Secretary has determined, in conjunction with the Senior Technical Authority designated under section 8669b(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, for the class of naval vessels that includes the covered vessel, that the critical mission, hull, mechanical, and electrical subsystems of the covered vessel—
(a) Documentation required.—Immediately upon the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees the following documentation relating to the Advanced Battle Management System:
(b) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for operations and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, not more than 25 percent may be obligated until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees the documentation required by subsection (a) and the Vice Chairman of the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs certifies the documentation.
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a special purpose test adjunct to the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery test to address computational thinking skills relevant to military applications, including problem decomposition, abstraction, pattern recognition, analytical ability, the identification of variables involved in data representation, and the ability to create algorithms and solution expressions.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the costs and benefits of the use and potential refurbishment of existing operating and mothballed Federal research and testing facilities to support hypersonics activities of the Department of Defense.
(a) Study.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on the use of additive manufacturing and three-dimensional bioprinting across the Military Health System.
(b) Elements.—The study required by subsection (a) shall examine the activities currently underway by each of the military services and the Department agencies, including costs, sources of funding, oversight, collaboration, and outcomes.
(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).
Section 257(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92; 133 Sta. 1291) is amended by adding at end the following new subparagraph:
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301.
(a) Definition for PFOA and PFOS.—Section 2700 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(4) The term ‘perfluorooctane sulfonate’ means perfluorooctane sulfonic acid or sulfonate (commonly referred to as ‘PFOS’) (Chemical Abstracts Service No. 1763–23–1) and the salts associated with perfluorooctane sulfonic acid or sulfonate (Chemical Abstracts Service Nos. 2795–39–3, 29457–72–5, 56773–42–3, 29081–56–9, and 70225–14–8).
(b) Modification of environmental restoration accounts.—Section 2703 of such title is amended—
(2) in subsection (f), by striking “to the Environmental Restoration Account, Defense, or to any environmental restoration account of a military department,” and inserting “or transferred to an account established under subsection (a)”;
(c) Modification of authority for environmental restoration projects of National Guard.—
(d) Extension of contract authority.—Section 2708(b) of such title is amended—
(e) Technical consistency for munitions response.—
(1) PROGRAM GOALS.—Section 2701(b)(2) of such title is amended by striking “of unexploded ordnance” and inserting “of unexploded ordnance, discarded military munitions, and munitions constituents in a manner consistent with section 2710 of this title”.
(2) ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION ACCOUNTS.—Section 2703(b) of such title is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: “Such remediation shall be conducted in a manner consistent with section 2710 of this title.”.
(3) TRANSFER OF DEFINITIONS.—
(4) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 313(d) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2710 note) is amended—
(f) Technical correction regarding cooperative agreements.—Section 332(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “shall meet or exceed the most stringent of the following” and inserting “relating to a response shall reflect application to the response of the most protective of the following”.
(a) Use of funds.—Section 2684a(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(b) Clarification of references to eligible entities.—
(1) DEFINITION.—Subsection (b) of section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “An agreement under this section may be entered into with” and inserting “For purposes of this section, an eligible entity is”.
(a) Survey of technologies and market research.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a survey and market research of relevant technologies, other than fire-fighting agent solutions, to determine whether any such technologies are available and can be adapted quickly for use by the Department of Defense to execute the phase-out by the Department of the use of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam.
(b) Briefing.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on the results of the survey and market research conducted under subsection (a).
(a) Modification of authority.—Section 2815 of title 10, United States Code is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting “(except as provided in subsections (d)(3) and (e))” before the period at the end;
(2) in subsection (c), by striking “A project” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (e)(2), a project”;
(4) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsections:
“(d) Location of projects.—Projects carried out pursuant to this section may be carried out—
“(2) on a facility used by the Department of Defense that is owned and operated by a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Virgin Islands, even if the facility is not under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, if the Secretary of Defense determines that the facility is subject to significant use by the armed forces for testing or training; or
“(e) Alternative funding source.— (1) In carrying out a project under this section, the Secretary concerned may use amounts available for operation and maintenance for the military department concerned if the Secretary concerned submits a notification to the congressional defense committees of the decision to carry out the project using such amounts and includes in the notification—
“(C) a certification that deferral of the project for inclusion in the next Military Construction Authorization Act would be inconsistent with national security or the protection of health, safety, or environmental quality, as the case may be.
(b) Consideration of military installation resilience in agreements and interagency cooperation.—Section 2684a of such title is amended—
(2) by amending subsection (h) to read as follows:
“(h) Interagency cooperation in conservation and resilience programs to avoid or reduce adverse impacts on military installation resilience and military readiness activities.—In order to facilitate interagency cooperation and enhance the effectiveness of actions that will protect the environment, military installation resilience, and military readiness, the recipient of funds provided pursuant to an agreement under this section or under the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670 et seq.) may, with regard to the lands and waters within the scope of the agreement, use such funds to satisfy any matching funds or cost-sharing requirement of any conservation or resilience program of any Federal agency notwithstanding any limitation of such program on the source of matching or cost-sharing funds.”.
(a) In general.—Chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2712. Native American lands environmental mitigation program
“(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of Defense may establish and carry out a program to mitigate the environmental effects of actions by the Department of Defense on Indian lands and culturally connected locations.
“(b) Program activities.—The activities that may be carried out under the program established under subsection (a) are the following:
“(1) Identification, investigation, and documentation of suspected environmental effects attributable to past actions by the Department of Defense.
“(2) Development of mitigation options for such environmental effects, including development of cost-to-complete estimates and a system for prioritizing mitigation actions.
“(3) Direct mitigation actions that the Secretary determines are necessary and appropriate to mitigate the adverse environmental effects of past actions by the Department.
“(4) Demolition and removal of unsafe buildings and structures used by, under the jurisdiction of, or formerly used by or under the jurisdiction of the Department.
“(c) Cooperative agreements.— (1) In carrying out the program established under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may enter into a cooperative agreement with an Indian tribe or an instrumentality of tribal government.
“(2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit of the United States Government.
“(d) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘Indian land’ includes—
“(A) any land located within the boundaries and a part of an Indian reservation, pueblo, or rancheria;
“(2) The term ‘Indian Tribe’ means any Indian Tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community, including any Native village, Regional Corporation, or Village Corporation (as defined in section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602)), that is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians.
“(3) The term ‘culturally connected location’ means a location or place that has demonstrable significance to Indians or Alaska Natives based on its association with the traditional beliefs, customs, and practices of a living community, including locations or places where religious, ceremonial, subsistence, medicinal, economic, or other lifeways practices have historically taken place.”.
(a) In general.—Subchapter I of chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2919 the following new section:
Ҥ 2920. Energy resilience and energy security measures on military installations
“(a) Energy resilience measures.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall, by the end of fiscal year 2030, provide that 100 percent of the energy load required to maintain the critical missions of each installation have a minimum level of availability of 99.9 percent per fiscal year.
“(2) The Secretary of Defense shall issue standards establishing levels of availability relative to specific critical missions, with such standards providing a range of not less than 99.9 percent availability per fiscal year and not more than 99.9999 percent availability per fiscal year, depending on the criticality of the mission.
“(b) Planning.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall require the Secretary of each military department and the head of each Defense Agency to plan for the provision of energy resilience and energy security for installations.
“(2) Planning under paragraph (1) shall—
“(A) promote the use of multiple and diverse sources of energy, with an emphasis favoring energy resources originating on the installation such as modular generation;
“(c) Development of information.—The planning required by subsection (b) shall identify each of the following for each installation:
“(3) The duration that those energy requirements are likely to be needed in the event of a disruption or emergency.
“(5) The duration that the currently provided energy would likely be available in the event of a disruption or emergency.
“(d) Testing and measuring.— (1) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall require the Secretary of each military department and head of each Defense Agency to conduct monitoring, measuring, and testing to provide the data necessary to comply with this section.
“(B) Any data provided under subparagraph (A) shall be made available to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment upon request.
“(2) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall require that black start exercises be conducted to assess the energy resilience and energy security of installations for periods established to evaluate the ability of the installation to perform critical missions without access to off-installation energy resources.
“(B) A black start exercise conducted under subparagraph (A) may exclude, if technically feasible, housing areas, commissaries, exchanges, and morale, welfare, and recreation facilities.
“(C) The Secretary of Defense shall—
“(i) provide uniform policy for the military departments and the Defense Agencies with respect to conducting black start exercises; and
“(ii) establish a schedule of black start exercises for the military departments and the Defense Agencies, with each military department and Defense Agency scheduled to conduct such an exercise on a number of installations each year sufficient to allow that military department or Defense Agency to meet the goals of this section, but in any event not fewer than five installations each year for each military department through fiscal year 2027.
“(e) Contract requirements.—For contracts for energy and utility services, the Secretary of Defense shall—
“(1) specify methods and processes to measure, manage, and verify compliance with subsection (a); and
“(2) ensure that such contracts include requirements appropriate to ensure energy resilience and energy security, including requirements for metering to measure, manage, and verify energy consumption, availability, and reliability consistent with this section and the energy resilience metrics and standards under section 2911(b) of this title.
“(g) Report.—If by the end of fiscal year 2029, the Secretary determines that the Department will be unable to meet the requirements under subsection (a), not later than 90 days after the end of such fiscal year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report detailing—
“(h) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘availability’ means the availability of required energy at a stated instant of time or over a stated period of time for a specific purpose.
“(2) The term ‘black start exercise’ means an exercise in which delivery of energy provided from off an installation is terminated before backup generation assets on the installation are turned on. Such an exercise shall—
“(A) determine the ability of the backup systems to start independently, transfer the load, and carry the load until energy from off the installation is restored;
“(3) The term ‘critical mission’—
“(A) means those aspects of the missions of an installation, including mission essential operations, that are critical to successful performance of the strategic national defense mission;
“(B) may include operational headquarters facilities, airfields and supporting infrastructure, harbor facilities supporting naval vessels, munitions production and storage facilities, missile fields, radars, satellite control facilities, cyber operations facilities, space launch facilities, operational communications facilities, and biological defense facilities; and
Section 2912(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “and, in the case of operational energy, from both training and operational missions,” after “under section 2913 of this title,”.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) DIRECTOR.—The term “Director” means the Director of the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program of the Department of Defense.
(2) DIRECTOR OF ARPA–E.—The term “Director of ARPA–E” means the Director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency—Energy.
(b) Establishment of Initiative.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall establish a demonstration initiative composed of demonstration projects focused on the development of long-duration energy storage technologies.
(c) Selection of projects.—To the maximum extent practicable, in selecting demonstration projects to participate in the Initiative, the Director shall—
(d) Joint Program.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—As part of the Initiative, the Director, in consultation with the Director of ARPA–E, shall establish within the Department of Defense a joint program to carry out projects—
(2) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.—Not later than 200 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Director of ARPA–E to administer the Joint Program.
(3) INFRASTRUCTURE.—In carrying out the Joint Program, the Director and the Director of ARPA–E shall—
(4) GOALS AND METRICS.—The Director and the Director of ARPA–E shall develop goals and metrics for technological progress under the Joint Program consistent with energy resilience and energy security policies.
(5) SELECTION OF PROJECTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—To the maximum extent practicable, in selecting projects to participate in the Joint Program, the Director and the Director of ARPA–E shall—
(B) PRIORITY.—In carrying out the Joint Program, the Director and the Director of ARPA–E shall give priority to demonstration projects that—
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of the General Services Administration, shall carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary of Defense may, notwithstanding section 400AA of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6374), purchase new alternative fuel vehicles for which the initial cost of such vehicles exceeds the initial cost of a comparable gasoline or diesel fueled vehicle by not more than 10 percent.
(b) Locations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) at not fewer than 2 facilities or installations of the Department of Defense in the continental United States that—
(c) Alternative fuel vehicle defined.—In this section, the term “alternative fuel vehicle” includes a vehicle that uses—
(1) fuels derived from renewable biomass, as defined in section 211(o)(1)(I) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(1)(I));
Section 325(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by striking “a 12-month period” and inserting “two 12-month periods, including one such period that begins in fiscal year 2021”.
(a) Study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of State, and the United States Commissioner of the International Boundary and Water Commission, shall commission an independent scientific study of the impacts of transboundary flows, spills, or discharges of pollution or debris from the Tijuana River on the personnel, activities, and installations of the Department of Defense.
(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the results of the study under subsection (a), including all findings and recommendations resulting from the study.
(a) In general.—
(1) INCREASE.—The amount authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense Wide for SAG 4GTN for the study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under section 316(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1350) is hereby increased by $5,000,000.
(b) Increase in transfer authority.—Section 316(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1350), as amended by section 315(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1713), is amended by striking “$10,000,000” and inserting “$15,000,000”.
Section 356 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 10 U.S.C. 771 note prec.) is amended—
Section 323(b) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1720; 10 U.S.C. 8690 note) is amended by striking “In the case of any naval vessel” and inserting “In the case of any aircraft carrier, amphibious ship, cruiser, destroyer, frigate, or littoral combat ship”.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive report on the impact of permafrost thaw on the infrastructure, facilities, assets, and operations of the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An identification of the infrastructure, facilities, and assets of the Department of Defense that could be impacted by permafrost thaw.
(c) Consultation.—In preparing the report under subsection (a), the Secretary may consult with other Federal agencies, agencies of State and local governments, and academic institutions with expertise or experience in the effects of permafrost thaw on infrastructure, facilities, and operations.
(a) Plans.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each military installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary that does not conduct live emergency response training on an annual basis or more frequently with the civilian law enforcement and emergency response agencies responsible for responding to an emergency at the installation develops a plan to conduct such training.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each plan developed under paragraph (1) with respect to an installation—
(b) Reports on training conducted.—
(1) LIST OF INSTALLATIONS.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a list of all military installations under the jurisdiction of the Secretary that conduct live emergency response training on an annual basis or more frequently with the civilian law enforcement and emergency response agencies responsible for responding to an emergency at the installation.
(2) ANNUAL REPORTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the commander of each military installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary shall submit to the Secretary a report on each live emergency response training conducted during the year covered by the report with the civilian law enforcement and emergency response agencies responsible for responding to an emergency at the installation.
(B) ELEMENTS.—Each report submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include, with respect to each training exercise, the following:
(C) INCLUSION IN ANNUAL BUDGET SUBMISSION.—
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the implementation by the Department of Defense of the requirements under section 246(a) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17053(a)).
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on vulnerabilities to military installations and combatant commander requirements resulting from extreme weather that builds upon the report submitted under section 335(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1358).
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An explanation of the underlying methodology that the Department uses to assess the effects of extreme weather in the report, including through the use of a climate vulnerability and risk assessment tool as directed under section 326 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
(2) An assessment of how extreme weather affects low-lying military installations, military installations of the Navy and the Marine Corps, and military installations outside the United States.
(3) An assessment of how extreme weather affects access of members of the Armed Forces to training ranges.
(4) With respect to a military installation in a country outside the United States, an assessment of the collaboration between the Department of Defense and the military or civilian agencies of the government of that country or nongovernmental organizations operating in that country to adapt to risks from extreme weather.
(5) An assessment of how extreme weather affects housing safety and food security on military installations.
(6) An assessment of the strategic benefits derived from isolating infrastructure of the Department of Defense in the United States from the national electric grid and the use of energy-efficient, distributed, and smart power grids by the Armed Forces in the United States and overseas to ensure affordable access to electricity.
(c) Consultation.—In developing the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Commander of the Army Corps of Engineers, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, a federally funded research and development center, and the heads of such other relevant Federal agencies as the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate.
(d) Form of report.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex if necessary.
(e) Publication.—Upon submittal of the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall publish the unclassified portion of the report on an Internet website of the Department of Defense that is available to the public.
No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to divest any manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft operated by the United States Special Operations Command, and the Department of Defense may not divest any manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft operated by the United States Special Operations Command in fiscal year 2021.
(a) Annual budget justification display.—Section 2805(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(2) The Secretary of each military department, the Director of each Defense Agency, and the head of any other relevant component of the Department of Defense shall track and report to the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) relevant data regarding all overseas construction projects funded with amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for operation and maintenance in support of contingency operations.
“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall prepare, for inclusion in the annual budget submission by the President to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, a consolidated budget justification display, in classified and unclassified form, that identifies all overseas construction projects funded with amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for operation and maintenance in support of contingency operations.
(b) Report on construction projects in support of contingency operations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on ways to improve the development, funding, and execution of construction projects in support of overseas contingency operations, including those funded with amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for operation and maintenance and those funded with amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for military construction.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A) An examination and comparison of the time required to plan, approve, and execute construction projects funded with operation and maintenance amounts versus those funded with military construction amounts, in support of contingency operations, including construction projects in support of recent operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Eastern Europe.
(B) A description of any challenges associated with the processes of the Department of Defense for planning, approving, and executing such projects.
Section 2465(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(5) A contract for the performance of on-site armed security guard functions to be performed—
“(A) at the Marine Corps Heritage Center at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, including the National Museum of the Marine Corps;
“(B) at the Heritage Center for the National Museum of the United States Army at Fort Belvoir, Virginia;
Section 2208(l) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 9515 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (k).
(a) Management of the Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund.—The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment shall exercise authority, direction, and control over the Operational Energy Capability Improvement Fund of the Department of Defense (in this section referred to as the “OECIF”).
(b) Alignment and coordination with related programs.—
(1) REALIGNMENT OF OECIF.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall realign the OECIF under the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, with such realignment to include personnel positions adequate for the mission of the OECIF.
(2) BETTER COORDINATION WITH RELATED PROGRAMS.—The Assistant Secretary shall ensure that the placement under the authority of the Assistant Secretary of the OECIF along with the Strategic Environmental Research Program, the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program, and the Operational Energy Prototyping Program is utilized to advance common goals of the Department, promote organizational synergies, and avoid unnecessary duplication of effort.
(c) Program for operational energy prototyping.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Commencing not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, shall carry out a program for the demonstration of technologies related to operational energy prototyping, including demonstration of operational energy technology and validation prototyping.
(2) OPERATION OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary shall ensure that the program under paragraph (1) operates in conjunction with the OECIF to promote the transfer of innovative technologies that have successfully established proof of concept for use in production or in the field.
(3) PROGRAM ELEMENTS.—In carrying out the program under paragraph (1) the Secretary shall—
(A) identify and demonstrate the most promising, innovative, and cost-effective technologies and methods that address high-priority operational energy requirements of the Department of Defense;
(B) in conducting demonstrations under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall—
(4) TOOL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSITION.—
(a) Removal.—Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement the plan submitted by the commission described in paragraph (b) and remove all names, symbols, displays, monuments, and paraphernalia that honor or commemorate the Confederate States of America (commonly referred to as the “Confederacy”) or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America from all assets of the Department of Defense.
(b) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a commission relating to assigning, modifying, or removing of names, symbols, displays, monuments, and paraphernalia to assets of the Department of Defense that commemorate the Confederate States of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America.
(c) Duties.—The Commission shall—
(1) assess the cost of renaming or removing names, symbols, displays, monuments, or paraphernalia that commemorate the Confederate States of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America;
(2) develop procedures and criteria to assess whether an existing name, symbol, monument, display, or paraphernalia commemorates the Confederate States of America or person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America;
(3) recommend procedures for renaming assets of the Department of Defense to prevent commemoration of the Confederate States of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America;
(4) develop a plan to remove names, symbols, displays, monuments, or paraphernalia that commemorate the Confederate States of America or any person who served voluntarily with the Confederate States of America from assets of the Department of Defense, within the timeline established by this Act; and
(d) Membership.—The Commission shall be composed of eight members, of whom—
(e) Appointment.—Members of the Commission shall be appointed not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Initial meeting.—The Commission shall hold its initial meeting on the date that is 60 days after the enactment of this Act.
(g) Briefings and reports.—Not later than October 1, 2021, the Commission shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives detailing the progress of the requirements under subsection (c). Not later than October 1, 2022, and not later than 90 days before the implementation of the plan in subsection (c)(4), the Commission shall present a briefing and written report detailing the results of the requirements under subsection (c), including:
(h) Funding.—
Section 183a(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
“(B) After the Clearinghouse issues a notice under subparagraph (A) with respect to an energy project, the parties should seek to identify feasible and affordable actions that can be taken by the Department, the developer of such energy project, or others to mitigate any adverse impact on military operations and readiness.
“(C) If the Secretary determines within a reasonable period of time after the issuance of a notice under subparagraph (A) with respect to an energy project that the concerns identified in the preliminary review conducted under paragraph (1) with respect to such project have been mitigated to the extent that such project does not pose an unacceptable level of risk to military operations and readiness, the Clearinghouse shall timely issue a mission compatibility letter to the applicant of such project, the governor of the State in which such project is located, and the Secretary of the finding of the Clearinghouse.”.
Section 8683 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Treatment of amounts appropriated after end of period of obligation.—In the application of section 1553(c) of title 31 to funds appropriated in the Operation and Maintenance, Navy account that are available for ship overhaul, the Secretary of the Navy—
(a) Requirement.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement the applicable security and emergency response recommendations relating to active shooter or terrorist attacks on installations of the Department of Defense made in the following reports:
(1) The report by the Government Accountability Office dated July 2015 entitled, “Insider Threats: DOD Should Improve Information Sharing and Oversight to Protect U.S. Installations” (GAO–15–543).
(2) The report prepared by the Department of the Navy relating to the Washington Navy Yard shooting in 2013.
(3) The report by the Department of the Army dated August 2010 entitled “Fort Hood, Army Internal Review Team: Final Report”.
(b) Notification of inapplicable recommendations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary determines that a recommendation described in subsection (a) is outdated, is no longer applicable, or has been superseded by more recent separate guidance or recommendations set forth by the Government Accountability Office, the Department of Defense, or another entity in related contracted review, the Secretary shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives not later than 45 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) In general.—Before making any final rule, statement, or determination regarding the limitation or prohibition of any food or beverage ingredient in military food service, military medical foods, commissary food, or commissary food service, the Secretary of Defense shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of a preliminary rule, statement, or determination (in this section referred to as a “proposed action”) and provide opportunity for public comment.
The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2021, as follows:
(a) In general.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2021, as follows:
(b) End strength reductions.—The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—
(c) End strength increases.—Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.
Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2021, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components:
(a) In general.—The authorized number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2021 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following:
(b) Limitation.—Under no circumstances may a military technician (dual status) employed under the authority of this section be coerced by a State into accepting an offer of realignment or conversion to any other military status, including as a member of the Active, Guard, and Reserve program of a reserve component. If a military technician (dual status) declines to participate in such realignment or conversion, no further action will be taken against the individual or the individual's position.
During fiscal year 2021, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
(a) In general.—Section 115(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the day after the date of the enactment of this Act. The amendment made by subsection (a)(2) shall apply with respect to budgets submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, after such effective date.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.
Effective as of October 1, 2021, the text of section 523 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“ The total number of commissioned officers serving on active duty in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps in each of the grades of major, lieutenant colonel, or colonel, or in the Navy in each of the grades of lieutenant commander, commander, or captain, at the end of any fiscal year shall be as specifically authorized by Act of Congress for such fiscal year.”.
(a) Regular officers.—Subparagraph (D) of section 533(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(b) Reserve officers.—Section 12207(b)(1) of such title is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), “or a designation in” and all that follows through “education or training,” and inserting “and who has special training or experience, or advanced education (if applicable),”; and
(2) by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following new subparagraph:
(c) Annual report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than February 1, 2022, and every four years thereafter, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the use of the authorities in subparagraph (D) of section 553(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)), and subparagraph (D) of section 12207(b)(1) of such title (as amended by subsection (b)) (each referred to in this subsection as a “constructive credit authority”) during the preceding fiscal year for the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for the fiscal year and Armed Forces covered by such report, the following:
(A) The manner in which constructive service credit was calculated under each constructive credit authority.
(B) The number of officers credited constructive service credit under each constructive credit authority.
(a) Regular officers.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter III of chapter 36 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 628 the following new section:
Ҥ 628a. Special selection review boards
“(a) In general.— (1) If the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that a person recommended by a promotion board for promotion to a grade at or below the grade of major general, rear admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force is the subject of credible information of an adverse nature, including any substantiated adverse finding or conclusion described in section 615(a)(3)(A) of this title, that was not furnished to the promotion board during its consideration of the person for promotion as otherwise required by such section, the Secretary shall convene a special selection review board under this section to review the person and recommend whether the recommendation for promotion of the person should be sustained.
“(2) If a person and the recommendation for promotion of the person is subject to review under this section by a special selection review board convened under this section, the name of the person—
“(b) Convening.— (1) Any special selection review board convened under this section shall be convened in accordance with the provisions of section 628(f) of this title.
“(c) Information considered.— (1) In reviewing a person and recommending whether the recommendation for promotion of the person should be sustained under this section, a special selection review board convened under this section shall be furnished and consider the following:
“(A) The record and information concerning the person furnished in accordance with section 615(a)(2) of this title to the promotion board that recommended the person for promotion.
“(B) Any credible information of an adverse nature on the person, including any substantiated adverse finding or conclusion from an officially documented investigation or inquiry described in section 615(a)(3)(A) of this title.
“(2) The furnishing of information to a special selection review board under paragraph (1)(B) shall be governed by the standards and procedures referred to in paragraph (3)(C) of section 615(a) of this title applicable to the furnishing of information described in paragraph (3)(A) of such section to selection boards in accordance with that section.
“(3) (A) Before information on a person described in paragraph (1)(B) is furnished to a special selection review board for purposes of this section, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that—
“(ii) subject to subparagraphs (C) and (D), the person is afforded a reasonable opportunity to submit comments on such information to the special selection review board before its review of the person and the recommendation for promotion of the person under this section.
“(B) If information on a person described in paragraph (1)(B) is not made available to the person as otherwise required by subparagraph (A)(i) due to the classification status of such information, the person shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be furnished a summary of such information appropriate to the person's authorization for access to classified information.
“(C) (i) An opportunity to submit comments on information is not required for a person under subparagraph (A)(ii) if—
“(d) Consideration.— (1) In considering the record and information on a person under this section, the special selection review board shall compare such record and information with an appropriate sampling of the records of those officers of the same competitive category who were recommended for promotion by the promotion board that recommended the person for promotion, and an appropriate sampling of the records of those officers who were considered by and not recommended for promotion by that promotion board.
“(2) Records and information shall be presented to a special selection review board for purposes of paragraph (1) in a manner that does not indicate or disclose the person or persons for whom the special selection review board was convened.
“(3) In considering whether the recommendation for promotion of a person should be sustained under this section, a special selection review board shall, to the greatest extent practicable, apply standards used by the promotion board that recommended the person for promotion.
“(4) The recommendation for promotion of a person may be sustained under this section only if the special selection review board determines that the person—
“(e) Reports.— (1) Each special selection review board convened under this section shall submit to the Secretary of the military department concerned a written report, signed by each member of the board, containing the name of each person whose recommendation for promotion it recommends for sustainment and certifying that the board has carefully considered the record and information of each person whose name was referred to it.
“(f) Appointment of persons.— (1) If the report of a special selection review board convened under this section recommends the sustainment of the recommendation for promotion to the next higher grade of a person whose name was referred to it for review under this section, and the President approves the report, the person shall, as soon as practicable, be appointed to that grade in accordance with subsections (b) and (c) of section 624 of this title.
“(2) A person who is appointed to the next higher grade as described in paragraph (1) shall, upon that appointment, have the same date of rank, the same effective date for the pay and allowances of that grade, and the same position on the active-duty list as the person would have had pursuant to the original recommendation for promotion of the promotion board concerned.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 36 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 628 the following new item:
(3) DELAY IN PROMOTION.—Section 624(d) of such title is amended—
(A) in paragraph (1)—
(iii) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new subparagraph (F):
“(F) the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that credible information of an adverse nature, including a substantiated adverse finding or conclusion described in section 615(a)(3)(A) of this title, with respect to the officer will result in the convening of a special selection review board under section 628a of this title to review the officer and recommend whether the recommendation for promotion of the officer should be sustained.”;
(b) Reserve officers.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1407 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 14502 the following new section:
Ҥ 14502a. Special selection review boards
“(a) In general.— (1) If the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that a person recommended by a promotion board for promotion to a grade at or below the grade of major general or rear admiral in the Navy is the subject of credible information of an adverse nature, including any substantiated adverse finding or conclusion described in section 14107(a)(3)(A) of this title, that was not furnished to the promotion board during its consideration of the person for promotion as otherwise required by such section, the Secretary shall convene a special selection review board under this section to review the person and recommend whether the recommendation for promotion of the person should be sustained.
“(2) If a person and the recommendation for promotion of the person is subject to review under this section by a special selection review board convened under this section, the name of the person—
“(b) Convening.— (1) Any special selection review board convened under this section shall be convened in accordance with the provisions of section 14502(b)(2) of this title.
“(c) Information considered.— (1) In reviewing a person and recommending whether the recommendation for promotion of the person should be sustained under this section, a special selection review board convened under this section shall be furnished and consider the following:
“(A) The record and information concerning the person furnished in accordance with section 14107(a)(2) of this title to the promotion board that recommended the person for promotion.
“(B) Any credible information of an adverse nature on the person, including any substantiated adverse finding or conclusion from an officially documented investigation or inquiry described in section 14107(a)(3)(A) of this title.
“(2) The furnishing of information to a special selection review board under paragraph (1)(B) shall be governed by the standards and procedures referred to in paragraph (3)(B) of section 14107(a) of this title applicable to the furnishing of information described in paragraph (3)(A) of such section to promotion boards in accordance with that section.
“(3) (A) Before information on person described in paragraph (1)(B) is furnished to a special selection review board for purposes of this section, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that—
“(ii) subject to subparagraphs (C) and (D), the person is afforded a reasonable opportunity to submit comments on such information to the special selection review board before its review of the person and the recommendation for promotion of the person under this section.
“(B) If information on an officer described in paragraph (1)(B) is not made available to the person as otherwise required by subparagraph (A)(i) due to the classification status of such information, the person shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be furnished a summary of such information appropriate to the person's authorization for access to classified information.
“(C) (i) An opportunity to submit comments on information is not required for a person under subparagraph (A)(ii) if—
“(d) Consideration.— (1) In considering the record and information on a person under this section, the special selection review board shall compare such record and information with an appropriate sampling of the records of those officers of the same competitive category who were recommended for promotion by the promotion board that recommended the person for promotion, and an appropriate sampling of the records of those officers who were considered by and not recommended for promotion by that promotion board.
“(2) Records and information shall be presented to a special selection review board for purposes of paragraph (1) in a manner that does not indicate or disclose the person or persons for whom the special selection review board was convened.
“(3) In considering whether the recommendation for promotion of a person should be sustained under this section, a special selection review board shall, to the greatest extent practicable, apply standards used by the promotion board that recommended the person for promotion.
“(4) The recommendation for promotion of a person may be sustained under this section only if the special selection review board determines that the person—
“(e) Reports.— (1) Each special selection review board convened under this section shall submit to the Secretary of the military department concerned a written report, signed by each member of the board, containing the name of each person whose recommendation for promotion it recommends for sustainment and certifying that the board has carefully considered the record and information of each person whose name was referred to it.
“(2) The provisions of sections 14109(c), 14110, and 14111 of this title apply to the report and proceedings of a special selection review board convened under this section in the same manner as they apply to the report and proceedings of a promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title.
“(f) Appointment of persons.— (1) If the report of a special selection review board convened under this section recommends the sustainment of the recommendation for promotion to the next higher grade of a person whose name was referred to it for review under this section, and the President approves the report, the person shall, as soon as practicable, be appointed to that grade in accordance with section 14308 of this title.
“(2) A person who is appointed to the next higher grade as described in paragraph (1) shall, upon that appointment, have the same date of rank, the same effective date for the pay and allowances of that grade, and the same position on the reserve active-status list as the person would have had pursuant to the original recommendation for promotion of the promotion board concerned.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1407 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 14502 the following new item:
(3) DELAY IN PROMOTION.—Section 14311 of such title is amended—
(A) in subsection (a)—
(i) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(F) The Secretary of the military department concerned determines that credible information of adverse nature, including a substantiated adverse finding or conclusion described in section 14107(a)(3)(A) of this title, with respect to the officer will result in the convening of a special selection review board under section 14502a of this title to review the officer and recommend whether the recommendation for promotion of the officer should be sustained.”; and
(c) Requirements for furnishing adverse information on regular officers to promotion selection boards.—
(1) EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENTS TO SPACE FORCE REGULAR OFFICERS.—Subparagraph (B)(i) of section 615(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “or, in the case of the Navy, lieutenant” and inserting “, in the case of the Navy, lieutenant, or in the case of the Space Force, the equivalent grade”.
(2) SATISFACTION OF REQUIREMENTS THROUGH SPECIAL SELECTION REVIEW BOARDS.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(D) With respect to the consideration of an officer for promotion to a grade at or below major general, in the case of the Navy, rear admiral, or, in the case of the Space Force, the equivalent grade, the requirements in subparagraphs (A) and (C) may be met through the convening and actions of a special selection review board with respect to the officer under section 628a of this title.”.
(3) DELAYED APPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENTS TO BOARDS FOR PROMOTION OF OFFICERS TO NON-GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER GRADES.—Subsection (c) of section 502 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended to read as follows:
“(c) Effective date and applicability.—
“(1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on December 20, 2019, and shall, except as provided in paragraph (2), apply with respect to the proceedings of promotion selection boards convened under section 611(a) of title 10, United States Code, after that date.
“(2) DELAYED APPLICABILITY FOR BOARDS FOR PROMOTION TO NON-GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER GRADES.—The amendments made this section shall apply with respect to the proceedings of promotion selection boards convened under section 611(a) of title 10, United States Code, for consideration of officers for promotion to a grade below the grade of brigadier general or, in the case of the Navy, rear admiral (lower half), only if such boards are so convened after January 1, 2021.”.
(d) Requirements for furnishing adverse information on reserve officers to promotion selection boards.—Section 14107(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) in subparagraph (A), as designated by paragraph (1), by striking “colonel, or, in the case of the Navy, captain” and inserting “lieutenant colonel, or, in the case of the Navy, commander”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs
“(B) The standards and procedures referred to in subparagraph (A) shall require the furnishing to the selection board, and to each individual member of the board, the information described in that subparagraph with regard to an officer in a grade specified in that subparagraph at each stage or phase of the selection board, concurrent with the screening, rating, assessment, evaluation, discussion, or other consideration by the board or member of the official military personnel file of the officer, or of the officer.
“(C) With respect to the consideration of an officer for promotion to a grade at or below major general or, in the Navy, rear admiral, the requirements in subparagraphs (A) and (B) may be met through the convening and actions of a special selection board with respect to the officer under section 14502a of this title.”.
Section 649c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):
“(d) Inapplicability of requirement relating to opportunities for consideration for promotion.—Section 645(1)(A)(i)(I) of this title shall not apply to the promotion of officers described in subsection (a) to the extent that such section is inconsistent with a number of opportunities for promotion specified pursuant to section 649d of this title.”.
(b) Deferred retirement or separation of health professions officers.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(c) Deferred retirement or separation of other officers.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(d) Retirement or separation based on years of creditable service.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Retirement or separation based on years of creditable service.—The following rules shall apply to a regular commissioned officer who is to be retired or separated under subsection (a):
(a) Restatement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 69 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 1370 and inserting the following new sections:
Ҥ 1370. Regular commissioned officers
“(a) Retirement in highest grade in which served satisfactorily.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Unless entitled to a different retired grade under some other provision of law, a commissioned officer (other than a commissioned warrant officer) of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force who retires under any provision of law other than chapter 61 or 1223 of this title shall be retired in the highest permanent grade in which such officer is determined to have served on active duty satisfactorily.
“(2) DETERMINATION OF SATISFACTORY SERVICE.—The determination of satisfactory service of an officer in a grade under paragraph (1) shall be made as follows:
“(3) EFFECT OF MISCONDUCT IN LOWER GRADE IN DETERMINATION.—If the Secretary of a military department or the Secretary of Defense, as applicable, determines that an officer committed misconduct in a lower grade than the retirement grade otherwise provided for the officer by this section—
“(4) NATURE OF RETIREMENT OF CERTAIN RESERVE OFFICERS AND OFFICERS IN TEMPORARY GRADES.—A reserve officer, or an officer appointed to a position under section 601 of this title, who is notified that the officer will be released from active duty without the officer's consent and thereafter requests retirement under section 7311, 8323, or 9311 of this title and is retired pursuant to that request is considered for purposes of this section to have been retired involuntarily.
“(b) Retirement of officers retiring voluntarily.—
“(1) SERVICE-IN-GRADE REQUIREMENT.—In order to be eligible for voluntary retirement under any provision of this title in a grade above the grade of captain in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, lieutenant in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force, a commissioned officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force must have served on active duty in that grade for a period of not less than three years, except that—
“(A) subject to subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense may reduce such period to a period of not less than two years for any officer; and
“(B) in the case of an officer to be retired in a grade at or below the grade of major general in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, rear admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, the Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of the military department concerned to reduce such period to a period of not less than two years.
“(2) LIMITATION ON DELEGATION.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) may not be delegated. The authority of the Secretary of a military department in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), as delegated to such Secretary pursuant to such subparagraph, may not be further delegated.
“(3) WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT.—Subject to subsection (c), the President may waive the application of the service-in-grade requirement in paragraph (1) to officers covered by that paragraph in individual cases involving extreme hardship or exceptional or unusual circumstances. The authority of the President under this paragraph may not be delegated.
“(4) LIMITATION ON REDUCTION OR WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT FOR OFFICERS UNDER INVESTIGATION OR PENDING MISCONDUCT.—In the case of an officer to be retired in a grade above the grade of colonel in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, captain in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force, the service-in-grade requirement in paragraph (1) may not be reduced pursuant to that paragraph, or waived pursuant to paragraph (3), while the officer is under investigation for alleged misconduct or while there is pending the disposition of an adverse personnel action against the officer.
“(5) GRADE AND FISCAL YEAR LIMITATIONS ON REDUCTION OR WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS.—The aggregate number of members of an armed force in a grade for whom reductions are made under paragraph (1), and waivers are made under paragraph (3), in a fiscal year may not exceed—
“(A) in the case of officers to be retired in a grade at or below the grade of major in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, lieutenant commander in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force, the number equal to two percent of the authorized active-duty strength for that fiscal year for officers of that armed force in that grade;
“(B) in the case of officers to be retired in the grade of lieutenant colonel or colonel in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, commander or captain in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, the number equal to four percent of the authorized active-duty strength for that fiscal year for officers of that armed force in the applicable grade; or
“(C) in the case of officers to be retired in the grade of brigadier general or major general in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, rear admiral (lower half) or rear admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, the number equal to 10 percent of the authorized active-duty strength for that fiscal year for officers of that armed force in the applicable grade.
“(6) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON REDUCTION OR WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL, FLAG, AND EQUIVALENT OFFICER GRADES.—In the case of an officer to be retired in a grade that is a general or flag officer grade, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, who is eligible to retire in that grade only by reason of an exercise of the authority in paragraph (1) to reduce the service-in-grade requirement in that paragraph, or the authority in paragraph (3) to waive that requirement, the Secretary of Defense or the President, as applicable, shall, not later than 60 days prior to the date on which the officer will be retired in that grade, notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the exercise of the applicable authority with respect to that officer.
“(7) RETIREMENT IN NEXT LOWEST GRADE FOR OFFICERS NOT MEETING REQUIREMENT.—An officer described in paragraph (1) whose length of service in the highest grade held by the officer while on active duty does not meet the period of the service-in-grade requirement applicable to the officer under this subsection shall, subject to subsection (c), be retired in the next lower grade in which the officer served on active duty satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the military department concerned or the Secretary of Defense, as applicable.
“(c) Officers in O–9 and O–10 grades.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—An officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force who is serving or has served in a position of importance and responsibility designated by the President to carry the grade of lieutenant general or general in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, vice admiral or admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force under section 601 of this title may be retired in such grade under subsection (a) only after the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing to the President and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the officer served on active duty satisfactorily in such grade.
“(2) PROHIBITION ON DELEGATION.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense to make a certification with respect to an officer under paragraph (1) may not be delegated.
“(3) REQUIREMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH CERTIFICATION.—A certification with respect to an officer under paragraph (1) shall—
“(4) CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER NOTICE.—In the case of an officer under paragraph (1) to whom a reduction in the service-in-grade requirement under subsection (b)(1) or waiver under subsection (b)(3) applies, the requirement for notification under subsection (b)(6) is satisfied if the notification is included in the certification submitted by the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (1).
“(d) Conditional retirement grade and retirement for officers pending investigation or adverse action.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—When an officer serving in a grade at or below the grade of major general in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, rear admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force is under investigation for alleged misconduct or pending the disposition of an adverse personnel action at the time of retirement, the Secretary of the military department concerned may—
“(2) OFFICERS IN O–9 AND O–10 GRADES.—When an officer described by subsection (c)(1) is under investigation for alleged misconduct or pending the disposition of an adverse personnel action at the time of retirement, the Secretary of Defense may—
“(3) REDUCTION OR WAIVER OF SERVICE-IN-GRADE REQUIREMENT PROHIBITED FOR GENERAL, FLAG, AND EQUIVALENT OFFICER GRADES.—In conditionally determining the retirement grade of an officer under paragraph (1)(A) or (2)(A) of this subsection to be a grade above the grade of colonel in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, captain in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force, the service-in-grade requirement in subsection (b)(1) may not be reduced pursuant to subsection (b)(1) or waived pursuant to subsection (b)(3).
“(e) Final retirement grade following resolution of pending investigation or adverse action.—
“(1) NO CHANGE FROM CONDITIONAL RETIREMENT GRADE.—If the resolution of an investigation or personnel action with respect to an officer who has been retired in a conditional retirement grade pursuant to subsection (d) results in a determination that the conditional retirement grade in which the officer was retired will not be changed, the conditional retirement grade of the officer shall, subject to paragraph (3), be the final retired grade of the officer.
“(2) CHANGE FROM CONDITIONAL RETIREMENT GRADE.—If the resolution of an investigation or personnel action with respect to an officer who has been retired in a conditional retirement grade pursuant to subsection (d) results in a determination that the conditional retirement grade in which the officer was retired should be changed, the changed retirement grade shall be the final retired grade of the officer under this section, except that if the final retirement grade provided for an officer pursuant to this paragraph is the grade of lieutenant general or general in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, vice admiral or admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, the requirements in subsection (c) shall apply in connection with the retirement of the officer in such final retirement grade.
“(3) RECALCULATION OF RETIRED PAY.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—If the final retired grade of an officer is as a result of a change under paragraph (2), the retired pay of the officer under chapter 71 of this title shall be recalculated accordingly, with any modification of the retired pay of the officer to go into effect as of the date of the retirement of the officer.
“(B) PAYMENT OF HIGHER AMOUNT FOR PERIOD OF CONDITIONAL RETIREMENT GRADE.—If the recalculation of the retired pay of an officer results in an increase in retired pay, the officer shall be paid the amount by which such increased retired pay exceeded the amount of retired pay paid the officer for retirement in the officer's conditional grade during the period beginning on the date of the retirement of the officer in such conditional grade and ending on the effective date of the change of the officer's retired grade. For an officer whose retired grade is determined pursuant to subsection (c), the effective date of the change of the officer's retired grade for purposes of this subparagraph shall be the date that is 60 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the certification required by subsection (c) in connection with the retired grade of the officer.
“(C) RECOUPMENT OF OVERAGE DURING PERIOD OF CONDITIONAL RETIREMENT GRADE.—If the recalculation of the retired pay of an officer results in a decrease in retired pay, there shall be recouped from the officer the amount by which the amount of retired pay paid the officer for retirement in the officer's conditional grade exceeded such decreased retired pay during the period beginning on the date of the retirement of the officer in such conditional grade and ending on the effective date of the change of the officer's retired grade.
“(f) Finality of retired grade determinations.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except for a conditional determination authorized by subsection (d), a determination of the retired grade of an officer pursuant to this section is administratively final on the day the officer is retired, and may not be reopened, except as provided in paragraph (2).
“(2) REOPENING.—A final determination of the retired grade of an officer may be reopened as follows:
“(3) APPLICABLE SECRETARY.—For purposes of this subsection, the applicable Secretary for purposes of a determination or action specified in this subsection is—
“(4) NOTICE AND LIMITATION.—If a final determination of the retired grade of an officer is reopened in accordance with paragraph (2), the applicable Secretary—
“(5) ADDITIONAL NOTICE ON REOPENING FOR OFFICERS RETIRED IN O–9 AND O–10 GRADES.—If the determination of the retired grade of an officer whose retired grade was provided for pursuant to subsection (c) is reopened, the Secretary of Defense shall also notify the President and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
“(6) MANNER OF MAKING OF CHANGE.—If the retired grade of an officer is proposed to be changed through the reopening of the final determination of an officer’s retired grade under this subsection, the change in grade shall be made—
“(A) in the case of an officer whose retired grade is to be changed to a grade at or below the grade of major general in the Army, Air Force or Marine Corps, rear admiral in the Navy, or the equivalent grade in the Space Force, in accordance with subsections (a) and (b)—
“(B) in the case of an officer whose retired grade is to be changed to the grade of lieutenant general or general in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, vice admiral or admiral in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
“(7) RECALCULATION OF RETIRED PAY.—If the final retired grade of an officer is changed through the reopening of the officer's retired grade under this subsection, the retired pay of the officer under chapter 71 of this title shall be recalculated. Any modification of the retired pay of the officer as a result of the change shall go into effect on the effective date of the change of the officer’s retired grade, and the officer shall not be entitled or subject to any changed amount of retired pay for any period before such effective date. An officer whose retired grade is changed as provided in paragraph (6)(B) shall not be entitled or subject to a change in retired pay for any period before the date on which the Senate provides advice and consent for the retirement of the officer in such grade.
Ҥ 1370a. Officers entitled to retired pay for non-regular service
“(a) Retirement in highest grade held satisfactorily.—Unless entitled to a different grade, or to credit for satisfactory service in a different grade under some other provision of law, a person who is entitled to retired pay under chapter 1223 of this title shall, upon application under section 12731 of this title, be credited with satisfactory service in the highest permanent grade in which that person served satisfactorily at any time in the armed forces, as determined by the Secretary of the military department concerned in accordance with this section.
“(b) Service-in-grade requirement for officers in grades below O–5.—In order to be credited with satisfactory service in an officer grade (other than a warrant officer grade) below the grade of lieutenant colonel or commander (in the case of the Navy), a person covered by subsection (a) must have served satisfactorily in that grade (as determined by the Secretary of the military department concerned) as a reserve commissioned officer in an active status, or in a retired status on active duty, for not less than six months.
“(c) Service-in-grade requirement for offices in grades above O–4.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—In order to be credited with satisfactory service in an officer grade above major or lieutenant commander (in the case of the Navy), a person covered by subsection (a) must have served satisfactorily in that grade (as determined by the Secretary of the military department concerned) as a reserve commissioned officer in an active status, or in a retired status on active duty, for not less than three years.
“(2) SATISFACTION OF REQUIREMENT BY CERTAIN OFFICERS NOT COMPLETING THREE YEARS.—A person covered by paragraph (1) who has completed at least six months of satisfactory service in grade may be credited with satisfactory service in the grade in which serving at the time of transfer or discharge, notwithstanding failure of the person to complete three years of service in that grade, if the person is transferred from an active status or discharged as a reserve commissioned officer—
“(A) solely due to the requirements of a nondiscretionary provision of law requiring that transfer or discharge due to the person’s age or years of service; or
“(B) because the person no longer meets the qualifications for membership in the Ready Reserve solely because of a physical disability, as determined, at a minimum, by a medical evaluation board and at the time of such transfer or discharge the person (pursuant to section 12731b of this title or otherwise) meets the service requirements established by section 12731(a) of this title for eligibility for retired pay under chapter 1223 of this title, unless the disability is described in section 12731b of this title.
“(3) REDUCTION IN SERVICE-IN-GRADE REQUIREMENTS.—
“(A) OFFICERS IN GRADES BELOW GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER GRADES.—In the case of a person to be retired in a grade below brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half) in the Navy, the Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of a military department to reduce, subject to subparagraph (B), the three-year period of service-in-grade required by paragraph (1) to a period not less than two years. The authority of the Secretary of a military department under this subparagraph may not be delegated.
“(B) LIMITATION.—The number of reserve commissioned officers of an armed force in the same grade for whom a reduction is made under subparagraph (A) during any fiscal year in the period of service-in-grade otherwise required by paragraph (1) may not exceed the number equal to 2 percent of the strength authorized for that fiscal year for reserve commissioned officers of that armed force in an active status in that grade.
“(C) OFFICERS IN GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICERS GRADES.—The Secretary of Defense may reduce the three-year period of service-in-grade required by paragraph (1) to a period not less than two years for any person, including a person who, upon transfer to the Retired Reserve or discharge, is to be credited with satisfactory service in a general or flag officer grade under that paragraph. The authority of the Secretary of Defense under this subparagraph may not be delegated.
“(D) NOTICE TO CONGRESS ON REDUCTION IN SERVICE-IN-GRADE REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER GRADES.—In the case of a person to be credited under this section with satisfactory service in a grade that is a general or flag officer grade who is eligible to be credited with such service in that grade only by reason of an exercise of authority in subparagraph (C) to reduce the three-year service-in-grade requirement otherwise applicable under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall, not later than 60 days prior to the date on which the person will be credited with such satisfactory service in that grade, notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the exercise of authority in subparagraph (C) with respect to that person.
“(4) OFFICERS SERVING IN GRADES ABOVE O–6 INVOLUNTARILY TRANSFERRED FROM ACTIVE STATUS.—A person covered by paragraph (1) who has completed at least six months of satisfactory service in a grade above colonel or (in the case of the Navy) captain and, while serving in an active status in such grade, is involuntarily transferred (other than for cause) from active status may be credited with satisfactory service in the grade in which serving at the time of such transfer, notwithstanding failure of the person to complete three years of service in that grade.
“(5) ADJUTANTS AND ASSISTANT ADJUTANTS GENERAL.—If a person covered by paragraph (1) has completed at least six months of satisfactory service in grade, the person was serving in that grade while serving in a position of adjutant general required under section 314 of title 32 or while serving in a position of assistant adjutant general subordinate to such a position of adjutant general, and the person has failed to complete three years of service in that grade solely because the person’s appointment to such position has been terminated or vacated as described in section 324(b) of such title, the person may be credited with satisfactory service in that grade, notwithstanding the failure of the person to complete three years of service in that grade.
“(6) OFFICERS RECOMMENDED FOR PROMOTION SERVING IN CERTAIN GRADE BEFORE PROMOTION.—To the extent authorized by the Secretary of the military department concerned, a person who, after having been recommended for promotion in a report of a promotion board but before being promoted to the recommended grade, served in a position for which that grade is the minimum authorized grade may be credited for purposes of paragraph (1) as having served in that grade for the period for which the person served in that position while in the next lower grade. The period credited may not include any period before the date on which the Senate provides advice and consent for the appointment of that person in the recommended grade.
“(7) OFFICERS QUALIFIED FOR FEDERAL RECOGNITION SERVING IN CERTAIN GRADE BEFORE APPOINTMENT.—To the extent authorized by the Secretary of the military department concerned, a person who, after having been found qualified for Federal recognition in a higher grade by a board under section 307 of title 32, serves in a position for which that grade is the minimum authorized grade and is appointed as a reserve officer in that grade may be credited for the purposes of paragraph (1) as having served in that grade. The period of the service for which credit is afforded under the preceding sentence may be only the period for which the person served in the position after the Senate provides advice and consent for the appointment.
“(8) RETIREMENT IN NEXT LOWEST GRADE FOR OFFICERS NOT MEETING SERVICE-IN-GRADE REQUIREMENTS.—A person whose length of service in the highest grade held does not meet the service-in-grade requirements specified in this subsection shall be credited with satisfactory service in the next lower grade in which that person served satisfactorily (as determined by the Secretary of the military department concerned) for not less than six months.
“(d) Officers in O–9 and O–10 grades.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—A person covered by this section in the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps who is serving or has served in a position of importance and responsibility designated by the President to carry the grade of lieutenant general or general in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps, or vice admiral or admiral in the Navy under section 601 of this title may be retired in such grade under subsection (a) only after the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing to the President and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the officer served satisfactorily in such grade.
“(2) PROHIBITION ON DELEGATION.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense to make a certification with respect to an officer under paragraph (1) may not be delegated.
“(3) REQUIREMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH CERTIFICATION.—A certification with respect to an officer under paragraph (1) shall—
“(4) CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER NOTICE.—In the case of an officer under paragraph (1) who is eligible to be credited with service in a grade only by reason of the exercise of the authority in subsection (c)(3)(C) to reduce the three-year service-in-grade requirement under subsection (c)(1), the requirement for notification under subsection (c)(3)(D) is satisfied if the notification is included in the certification submitted by the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (1).
“(e) Conditional retirement grade and retirement for officers under investigation for misconduct or pending adverse personnel action.—The retirement grade, and retirement, of a person covered by this section who is under investigation for alleged misconduct or pending the disposition of an adverse personnel action at the time of retirement is as provided for by section 1370(d) of this title. In the application of such section 1370(d) for purposes of this subsection, any reference ‘active duty’ shall be deemed not to apply, and any reference to a provision of section 1370 of this title shall be deemed to be a reference to the analogous provision of this section.
“(f) Final retirement grade following resolution of pending investigation or adverse action.—The final retirement grade under this section of a person described in subsection (e) following resolution of the investigation or personnel action concerned is the final retirement grade provided for by section 1370(e) of this title. In the application of such section 1370(e) for purposes of this subsection, any reference to a provision of section 1370 of this title shall be deemed to be a reference to the analogous provision of this section. In the application of paragraph (3) of such section 1370e(e) for purposes of this subsection, the reference to ‘chapter 71’ of this title shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘chapter 1223 of this title’.
“(g) Finality of retired grade determinations.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except for a conditional determination authorized by subsection (e), a determination of the retired grade of a person pursuant to this section is administratively final on the day the person is retired, and may not be reopened.
“(2) REOPENING.—A determination of the retired grade of a person may be reopened in accordance with applicable provisions of section 1370(f) of this title. In the application of such section 1370(f) for purposes of this subsection, any reference to a provision of section 1370 of this title shall be deemed to be a reference to the analogous provision of this section. In the application of paragraph (7) of such section 1370(f) for purposes of this paragraph, the reference to ‘chapter 71 of this title’ shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘chapter 1223 of this title’.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 69 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 1370 and inserting the following new items:
“1370. Regular commissioned officers.
“1370a. Officers entitled to retired pay for non-regular service.”.
(b) Conforming and technical amendments to retired grade rules for the Armed Forces.—
(2) ARMY.—Section 7341 of such title is amended—
(3) NAVY AND MARINE CORPS.—Such title is further amended as follows:
(4) AIR FORCE AND SPACE FORCE.—Section 9341 of such title is amended—
(c) Other references.—In the determination of the retired grade of a commissioned officer of the Armed Forces entitled to retired pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, who retires after the date of the enactment of this Act, any reference in a provision of law or regulation to section 1370 of title 10, United States Code, in such determination with respect to such officer shall be deemed to be a reference to section 1370a of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)).
(a) Duty for certain reserve officers under joint duty limited exclusion.—Subsection (b) of section 526a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) DUTY FOR CERTAIN RESERVE OFFICERS.—Of the officers designated pursuant to paragraph (1), the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff may designate up to 15 general and flag officer positions in the unified and specified combatant commands, and up to three general and flag officer positions on the Joint Staff, as positions to be held only by reserve officers who are in a general or flag officer grade below lieutenant general or vice admiral. Each position so designated shall be considered to be a joint duty assignment position for purposes of chapter 38 of this title.”.
(a) Secondary schools.—Section 503(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A)—
(B) in clause (ii), by striking “and telephone listings,” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “electronic mail addresses, home telephone numbers, and mobile telephone numbers, notwithstanding subsection (a)(5)(B) or (b) of section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g); and”; and
(b) Institutions of higher education.—Section 983(b) of such title is amended—
(2) in paragraph (2)—
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking “and telephone listings” and inserting “electronic mail addresses, home telephone numbers, and mobile telephone numbers, which information shall be made available not later than 60 days after the start of classes for the current semester or not later than 60 days after the date of a request, whichever is later”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) access by military recruiters for purposes of military recruiting to lists of students (who are 17 years of age or older) not returning to the institution after having been enrolled during the previous semester, together with student recruiting information and the reason why the student did not return, if collected by the institution.”.
Section 688a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Redesignation as Certificate of Military Service.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Department of Defense Form DD 214, the Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, is hereby redesignated as the Certificate of Military Service.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1168(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “discharge certificate or certificate of release from active duty, respectively,” and inserting “Certificate of Military Serve”.
(3) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to Department of Defense Form DD 214, the Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, shall be deemed to be a reference to the Certificate of Military Service.
(5) EFFECTIVE DATES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), this subsection and the amendments made by this subsection shall take effect on the date provided for in subsection (d) of section 569 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), as redesignated by subsection (b)(1)(B) of this section.
(b) Additional requirements.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 569 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 is amended—
(A) in subsection (a)—
(C) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections:
“(b) Issuance to Reserves.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the issuance of the Certificate of Military Service, as modified pursuant to subsection (a), to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces at such times during their military service as is appropriate to facilitate their access to benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
“(c) Coordination.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense shall coordinate with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that the Certificate of Military Service, as modified pursuant to subsection (a), is recognized as the Certificate of Military Service referred to in section 1168(a) of title 10, United States Code, and for the purposes of establishing eligibility for applicable benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.”; and
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) In 1999, the RAND Corporation issued a report entitled “Barriers to Minority Participation in Special Operations Forces” that was sponsored by United States Special Operations Command.
(b) Study required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The evaluation under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(B) A comparison of the participation rates of minority populations in covered units to participation rates of the general population as members and as officers of the Armed Forces.
(C) A comparison of the percentage of minority officers in the grade of O–7 or higher who have served in each covered unit to such percentage for all such officers in the Armed Force of that covered unit.
(D) An identification of barriers to minority participation in the accession, assessment, and training processes.
(c) Designation.—The study conducted under subsection (b) shall be known as the “Study on Reducing Barriers to Minority Participation in Elite Units in the Armed Services”.
(d) Implementation plan.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an implementation plan for the recommendations that the Secretary implements under this section, including—
(a) Report on findings of Defense Board on Diversity and Inclusion in the Military.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Upon the completion by the Defense Board on Diversity and Inclusion in the Military of its report on actionable recommendations to increase racial diversity and ensure equal opportunity across all grades of the Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the report of the Defense Board, including the findings and recommendations of the Defense Board.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A comprehensive description of the findings and recommendations of the Defense Board in its report referred to in paragraph (1).
(B) A comprehensive description of any actionable recommendations of the Defense Board in its report.
(b) Report on Defense Advisory Committee on Diversity and Inclusion in the Armed Forces.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—At the same time the Secretary of Defense submits the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall also submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the Defense Advisory Committee on Diversity and Inclusion in the Armed Forces.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) The mission statement or purpose of the Advisory Committee, and any proposed objectives and goals of the Advisory Committee.
(c) Report on current diversity and inclusion in the Armed Forces.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—At the same time the Secretary of Defense submits the reports required by subsections (a) and (b), the Secretary shall also submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on current diversity and inclusion in the Armed Forces.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An identification of the current racial, ethnic, and sex composition of each Armed Force generally.
(B) An identification of the current racial, ethnic, and sex composition of each Armed Force by grade.
(C) A comparison of the participation rates of minority populations in officer grades, warrant officer grades, and enlisted member grades in each Armed Force with the percentage of such populations among the general population.
(D) A comparison of the participation rates of minority populations in each career field in each Armed Force with the percentage of such populations among the general population.
(E) A comparison among the Armed Forces of the percentage of minority populations in each officer grade above grade O–4.
(d) Sense of Senate on Defense Advisory Committee on Diversity and Inclusion in the Armed Forces.—It is the sense of the Senate that the Defense Advisory Committee on Diversity and Inclusion in the Armed Forces—
(3) should have a membership such that not fewer than 20 percent of members possess—
(4) should focus on objectives that address—
(A) barriers to promotion within the Armed Forces, including development of recommendations on mechanisms to enhance and increase racial diversity and ensure equal opportunity across all grades in the Armed Forces;
(B) participation of minority officers and senior noncommissioned officers in the Armed Forces, including development of recommendations on mechanisms to enhance and increase such participation;
(C) recruitment of minority candidates for innovative pre-service programs in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC), Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (SROTC), and military service academies, including programs in connection with flight instruction, special operations, and national security, including development of recommendations on mechanisms to enhance and increase such recruitment;
Section 550B of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(1)(B), by inserting “, including the United States Coast Guard Academy,” after “academy”;
(3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):
“(d) Advisory duties on Coast Guard Academy.—In providing advice under subsection (c)(1)(B), the Advisory Committee shall also advise the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating in accordance with this section on policies, programs, and practices of the United States Coast Guard Academy.”; and
(4) in subsection (e) and paragraph (2) of subsection (g), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this section, by striking “the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives” each place it appears and inserting “the Committees on Armed Services and Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives”.
(a) Survey.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than June 30, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a survey regarding the ability of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocates to perform their duties.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The survey required under paragraph (1) shall assess—
(A) the current state of support provided to Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocates, including—
(B) the ability of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocates to contact and access their installation commander or unit commander;
(C) the ability of Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocates to contact and access the immediate commander of victims and alleged offenders;
(a) Briefing required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Judge Advocates General of the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Coast Guard, and the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall each provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the status of the Special Victims’ Counsel program of the Armed Force concerned.
(b) Elements.—Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the Special Victims Counsel program of the Armed Force concerned, the following:
(1) An assessment of whether the Armed Force is in compliance with the provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) relating to the Special Victims Counsel program and, if not, what steps have been taken to achieve compliance with such provisions.
(3) A description of any staffing shortfalls in the Special Victims’ Counsel program or other programs of the Armed Force resulting from the additional responsibilities required of the Special Victims’ Counsel program under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020.
(a) Strategy on holding leadership accountable required.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement Department of Defense-wide a strategy to hold individuals in positions of leadership in the Department (including members of the Armed Forces and civilians) accountable for the promotion, support, and enforcement of the policies and programs of the Department on sexual harassment.
(b) Oversight framework.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall provide for an oversight framework for the efforts of the Department of Defense to promote, support, and enforce the policies and programs of the Department on sexual harassment.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The oversight framework required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) Long-term goals, objectives, and milestones in connection with the policies and programs of the Department on sexual harassment.
(C) Criteria for assessing progress toward the achievement of the goals, objectives, and milestones referred to in subparagraph (A).
(c) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the actions taken to carry out this section, including the strategy developed and implemented pursuant to subsection, and the oversight framework developed and implemented pursuant to subsection (b).
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, prescribe in regulations a safe-to-report policy described in subsection (b) that applies with respect to all members of the Armed Forces (including members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces) and cadets and midshipmen at the military service academies.
(b) Safe-to-report policy.—The safe-to-report policy described in this subsection is a policy that prescribes the handling of minor collateral misconduct involving a member of the Armed Forces who is the alleged victim of sexual assault.
(c) Aggravating circumstances.—The regulations under subsection (a) shall specify aggravating circumstances that increase the gravity of minor collateral misconduct or its impact on good order and discipline for purposes of the safe-to-report policy.
(d) Tracking of collateral misconduct incidents.—In conjunction with the issuance of regulations under subsection (a), Secretary shall develop and implement a process to track incidents of minor collateral misconduct that are subject to the safe-to-report policy.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “Armed Forces” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, except such term does not include the Coast Guard.
(3) The term “minor collateral misconduct” means any minor misconduct that is potentially punishable under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), that—
(A) is committed close in time to or during the sexual assault, and directly related to the incident that formed the basis of the sexual assault allegation;
Section 550B(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
Section 550B(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by adding at the end the following: “The report shall include the following:
“(1) A description and assessment of the extent and effectiveness of the inclusion by the Armed Forces of sexual assault prevention and response training in leader professional military education (PME), especially in such education for personnel in junior noncommissioned officer grades.
“(2) An assessment of the feasibility of—
“(3) An assessment of the feasibility of conducting exit interviews of members of the Armed Forces upon their discharge release from the Armed Forces in order to determine whether they experienced or witnessed sexual assault or harassment during military service and did not report it, and an assessment of the feasibility of combining such exit interviews with the Catch a Serial Offender (CATCH) Program of the Department of Defense.
“(4) An assessment whether the sexual assault reporting databases of the Department are sufficiently anonymized to ensure privacy while still providing military leaders with the information as follows:
“(A) The approximate length of time the victim and the assailant had been at the duty station at which the sexual assault occurred.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, the Superintendent of each military service academy, and the head of each degree-granting military educational institution, prescribe in regulations a policy under which association between a cadet or midshipman of a military service academy, or a member of the Armed Forces enrolled in a degree-granting military educational institution, who is the alleged victim of a sexual assault and the accused is minimized while both parties complete their course of study at the academy or institution concerned.
(b) Elements.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the policy developed under subsection (a)—
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the feasibility and advisability, and current practice (if any), of the Department of Defense of granting requests by members of the Armed Forces who are in academic status (whether at the military service academies or in developmental education programs) and who are victims of sexual assault to be placed on a Non-Rated Period for their performance report.
Section 806b(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 6b(a)(2)) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(a) In general.—Section 866 of title 10, United States Code (article 66 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e):
“(e) Consideration of the evidence.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—In an appeal of a finding of guilty under subsection (b), the Court of Criminal Appeals, upon request of the accused, may consider the weight of the evidence upon a specific showing by the accused of deficiencies in proof. The Court may set aside and dismiss a finding if clearly convinced that the finding was against the weight of the evidence. The Court may affirm a lesser finding. A rehearing may not be ordered.
(b) Additional qualifications of appellate military judges.—Subsection (a) of such section (article) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) (A) In addition to any other qualifications specified in paragraph (1), any commissioned officer assigned as an appellate military judge to a Court of Criminal Appeals shall have not fewer than 12 years of experience in military justice assignments before such assignment, and any civilian so assigned shall have not fewer than 12 years as a judge or criminal trial attorney before such assignment.
“(B) A Judge Advocate General may waive the requirement in subparagraph (A) in connection with the assignment of an officer or civilian as an appellate military judge of a Court of Criminal Appeals if the Judge Advocate General determines that compliance with the requirement in the assignment of appellate military judges to a Court of Criminal Appeals will impair the ability of the Court to hear and decide appeals in a timely manner.
“(C) Not later than 120 days after waiving the requirement in subparagraph (A) pursuant to subparagraph (B), the Judge Advocate General shall notify the congressional defense committees of the waiver, and include with the notice an explanation for the shortage of appellate military judges and a plan for addressing such shortage.”.
Section 940a of title 10, United States Code (article 140a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(a) Report required.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report, in writing, on a study, conducted by the Comptroller General for purposes of the report, on the implementation by the Armed Forces of the following:
(1) The recommendations in the May 2019 report of the General Accountability Office entitled “Military Justice: DOD and the Coast Guard Need to Improve Their Capabilities to Assess Racial and Gender Disparities” (GAO–19–344).
(2) Requirements in section 540I(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), relating to assessments covered by such recommendations.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include, for each recommendation and requirement specified in that subsection, the following:
(1) A description of the actions taken or planned by the Department of Defense, the military department concerned, or the Armed Force concerned to implement such recommendation or requirement.
(c) Briefings.—Not later than May 1, 2021, the Comptroller General shall provide the committees referred to in subsection (a) one or more briefings on the status of the study required by that subsection, including any preliminary findings and recommendations of the Comptroller General as a result of the study as of the date of such briefing.
(a) Briefing required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Judge Advocates General of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force and the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall jointly brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the mental health support for vicarious trauma provided to personnel in the military justice system specified in subsection (b).
(c) Elements.—The briefing required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A description and assessment of the mental health support for vicarious trauma provided to personnel in the military justice system specified in subsection (b), including a description of the support services available and the support services being used.
(2) A description and assessment of mechanisms to eliminate or reduce stigma in the pursuit by such personnel of such mental health support.
(3) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of providing such personnel with breaks between assignments or cases as part of such mental health support in order to reduce the effects of vicarious trauma.
(4) A description and assessment of the extent, if any, to which duty of such personnel on particular types of cases, or in particular caseloads, contributes to vicarious trauma, and of the extent, if any, to which duty on such cases or caseloads has an effect on retention of such personnel in the Armed Forces.
Section 540L(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92; 133 Stat. 1373) is amended by adding before the period at the end the following: “, including an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing a guardian ad litem program for military dependents living outside the United States”.
(a) In general.—As recommended on page 149 of the Report of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate to Accompany S. 1519 (115th Congress) (Senate Report 115–125), the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement training on Federal statutes, Department of Defense instructions, and the regulations of each Armed Force regarding religious liberty and accommodation for members of the Armed Forces, including the responsibility of commanders to maintain good order and discipline.
(b) Consultation.—The Secretary develop and implement the training required by subsection (a) in consultation with the following:
(c) Contents.—The content of the training shall be consistent with and include coverage of each of the following:
(1) The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.).
(2) Section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. prec. 1030 note).
(3) Section 528 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 814).
(a) Additional elements.—In submitting to Congress in 2021 the certifications required by section 545 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1396; 10 U.S.C. 8431 note prec.), relating to the Ready, Relevant Learning initiative of the Navy, the Secretary of the Navy shall also submit each of the following:
(b) Life cycle sustainment plan.—The life cycle sustainment plan required by subsection (a)(1) shall include a description of the approved life cycle sustainment plan for the Ready, Relevant Learning initiative, including with respect to each of the following:
(c) Report on use of readiness assessment teams.—The report required by subsection (a)(2) shall set forth the following:
(1) A description and assessment of the extent to which the Navy is currently using Engineering Readiness Assessment Teams (ERAT) and Combat Systems Readiness Assessment Teams (CSRAT) to conduct unit-level training and assistance in each capacity as follows:
(a) Report required.—Not later than June 8, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the standardization and potential merger of law enforcement training for military and civilian personnel across the Department of Defense, including training of military or civilian personnel of the Department designated in accordance with section 2762 of title 10, United States Code, to protect buildings, grounds, and property under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department and the persons on such property.
(b) Elements.—In developing the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall do, and include in the report the results of, the following:
(1) Identify and assess current law enforcement training courses, schools, and programs of the Armed Forces that have the flexibility and capacity to support the training referred to in subsection (a) through common training standards.
(2) Identify and assess current Department law enforcement training courses, schools, and programs that are affiliated with or accredited by third parties (including both governmental and private entities), including an assessment of the value derived from such affiliation or accreditation to the training referred to in subsection (a).
(3) Identify emerging law enforcement training requirements that are common among the Armed Forces and other Department law enforcement components and are currently unmet by the Armed Forces or such components.
(4) Assess the feasibility, advisability, and suitability of incorporating standardized and merged field and operational training in military law enforcement mission areas, including area security operations, law and order operations, internment and resettlement operations, and police intelligence operations, in the training provided to all Armed Forces and other Department law enforcement components.
(5) Identify and assess Department courses, programs, or institutions with the capability to support law enforcement training or information sharing between Department military and civilian law enforcement components and State, county, and local law enforcement agencies, with the capability to support law enforcement components of the National Guard and other reserve components of the Armed Forces, or with both such capabilities.
(a) Quarterly reports required.—Not later than March 1, 2021, and every 90 days thereafter through March 1, 2024, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict shall, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the current status of the implementation of the actions recommended as a result of the Comprehensive Review of Special Operations Forces Culture and Ethics.
(b) Elements.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A list of the actions required as of the date of such report to complete full implementation of each of the 16 actions recommended by the Comprehensive Review referred to in subsection (a).
(2) An identification of the office responsible for completing each action listed pursuant to paragraph (1), and an estimated timeline for completion of such action.
(a) Report on congressional nominations portal.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Superintendents of the military service academies, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of a uniform online portal for all military service academies that enables Members of Congress to nominate individuals for appointment to each academy through a secure website.
(2) INFORMATION COLLECTION AND REPORTING.—For purposes of preparing the report required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall treat the online portal described in that paragraph as permitting the collection, from each Member of Congress, of the demographic information described in subsection (b) for each individual nominated by the Member.
(3) AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.—For purposes of preparing the report, the Secretary shall treat the online portal as permitting Members of Congress and their designees to view past nomination records for all application cycles.
(b) Standard classifications for collection of demographic data.—
(1) STANDARDS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Superintendents of the military service academies, establish standard classifications that cadets, midshipmen, and applicants to the academies may use to self-identify gender, race, and ethnicity and to provide other demographic information in connection with admission to or enrollment in an academy.
(2) CONSISTENCY WITH OMB GUIDANCE.—The standard classifications established under paragraph (1) shall be consistent with the standard classifications specified in Office of Management and Budget Directive No. 15 (pertaining to race and ethnic standards for Federal statistics and administrative reporting) or any successor directive.
(a) Pilot programs authorized.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out either or both of the pilot programs as follows:
(1) A pilot program, with elements as provided for in subsection (c), at covered institutions in order to assess the feasibility and advisability of mechanisms to reduce barriers to participation in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps at such institutions by creating partnerships between satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units at such institutions and military installations.
(c) Pilot program on partnerships between satellite or extension SROTC units and military installations.—
(1) PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the pilot program authorized by subsection (a)(1) at not fewer than five covered institutions selected by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program.
(2) REQUIREMENTS FOR SELECTION.—Each covered institution selected by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program authorized by subsection (a)(1) shall—
(A) currently maintain a satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit under chapter 103 of title 10, United States Code, that is located more than 20 miles from the host unit of such unit; or
(3) PREFERENCE IN SELECTION OF INSTITUTIONS.—In selecting covered institutions under this subsection for participation in the pilot program authorized by subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall give preference to covered institutions that are located within 20 miles of a military installation of the same Armed Force as the host unit of the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corp of the covered institution concerned.
(4) PARTNERSHIP ACTIVITIES.—The activities conducted under the pilot program authorized by subsection (a)(1) between a satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit and the military installation concerned shall include such activities designed to reduce barriers to participation in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps at the covered institution concerned as the Secretary considers appropriate, including measures to mitigate travel time and expenses in connection with receipt of Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps instruction.
(d) Pilot program on financial assistance for SROTC members for flight training.—
(1) ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION BY SROTC MEMBERS.—A member of a Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps unit at a covered institution may participate in the pilot program authorized by subsection (a)(2) if the member meets such academic requirements at the covered institution, and such other requirements, as the Secretary shall establish for purposes of the pilot program.
(2) PREFERENCE IN SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS.—In selecting members under this subsection for participation in the pilot program authorized by subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall give a preference to members who will pursue flight training under the pilot program at a covered institution.
(3) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR FLIGHT TRAINING.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may provide any member of a Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps who participates in the pilot program authorized by subsection (a)(2) financial assistance to defray, whether in whole or in part, the charges and fees imposed on the member for flight training.
(B) FLIGHT TRAINING.—Financial assistance may be used under subparagraph (A) for a course of flight training only if the course meets Federal Aviation Administration standards and is approved by the Federal Aviation Administration and the applicable State approving agency.
(C) USE.—Financial assistance received by a member under subparagraph (A) may be used only to defray the charges and fees imposed on the member as described in that subparagraph.
(e) Evaluation metrics.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot programs under subsection (a).
(f) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the commencement of the pilot programs under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot programs. The report shall include the following:
(2) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the Secretary carries out the pilot programs, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot programs during such fiscal year. Each report shall include, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:
(A) In the case of the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), a description of the partnerships between satellite or extension Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units and military installations under the pilot program.
(B) In the case of the pilot program under subsection (a)(2), the following:
(i) The number of members of Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units at covered institutions selected for purposes of the pilot program, including the number of such members participating in the pilot program.
(3) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days prior to the completion of the pilot programs, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot programs. The report shall include the following:
(C) A description of the cost of each pilot program, and an estimate of the cost of making each pilot program permanent.
(g) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “covered institution” has the meaning given that term in section 262(g)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
(a) Award or presentation authorized.—Section 1130 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):
“(d) (1) A decoration may be awarded or presented following the submission of a favorable recommendation for the award or presentation of the decoration under subsection (b).
(b) Conforming and clerical amendments.—
(a) Honorary promotions on initiative of DoD.—Chapter 80 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1563 the following new section:
Ҥ 1563a. Honorary promotions on the initiative of the Department of Defense
“(a) In general.— (1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary may make an honorary promotion (whether or not posthumous) of a former member or retired member of the armed forces to any grade not exceeding the grade of major general, rear admiral (upper half), or an equivalent grade in the Space Force if the Secretary determines that the promotion is merited.
“(b) Notice to Congress.—The Secretary may not make an honorary promotion pursuant to subsection (a) until 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a notice of the determination to make the promotion, including a detailed discussion of the rationale supporting the determination.
“(c) Notice of promotion.—Upon making an honorary promotion pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall expeditiously notify the former member or retired member concerned, or the next of kin of such former member or retired member if such former member or retired member is deceased, of the promotion.
“(d) Nature of promotion.—Any promotion pursuant to this section is honorary, and shall not affect the pay, retired pay, or other benefits from the United States to which the former member or retired member concerned is entitled or would have been entitled based on the military service of such former member or retired member, nor affect any benefits to which any other person is or may become entitled based on the military service of such former member or retired member.”.
(b) Modification of authorities on review of proposals from Congress.—
(1) STANDARDIZATION OF AUTHORITIES WITH AUTHORITIES ON DOD INITIATIVE.—Section 1563 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in subsection (a)—
(i) in the first sentence, by striking “the posthumous or honorary promotion or appointment of a member or former member of the armed forces, or any other person considered qualified,” and inserting “the honorary promotion (whether or not posthumous) of a former member or retired member of the armed forces”; and
(2) AUTHORITY TO MAKE HONORARY PROMOTIONS FOLLOWING REVIEW OF PROPOSALS.—Such section is further amended—
(B) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):
“(c) Authority To make.— (1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Defense may make an honorary promotion (whether or not posthumous) of a former member or retired member of the armed forces to any grade not exceeding the grade of major general, rear admiral (upper half), or an equivalent grade in the Space Force following the submittal of the determination of the Secretary concerned under subsection (b) in connection with the proposal for the promotion if the determination is to approve the making of the promotion.
“(2) The Secretary of Defense may not make an honorary promotion under this subsection until 60 days after the date on which the Secretary concerned submits the determination in connection with the proposal for the promotion under subsection (b), and the detailed rationale supporting the determination as described in that subsection, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives and the requesting Member in accordance with that subsection.
“(3) The authority to make an honorary promotion under this subsection shall apply notwithstanding that the promotion is not otherwise authorized by law.
“(4) Any promotion pursuant to this subsection is honorary, and shall not affect the pay, retired pay, or other benefits from the United States to which the former member or retired member concerned is or would have been entitled based upon the military service of such former member or retired member, nor affect any benefits to which any other person may become entitled based on the military service of such former member or retired member.”.
(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 80 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1563 and inserting the following new items:
“1563. Consideration of proposals from Members of Congress for honorary promotions: procedures for review and promotion.
“1563a. Honorary promotions on the initiative of the Department of Defense.”.
(a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $50,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b) Local educational agency defined.—In this section, the term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 7013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).
(a) In general.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $10,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–77; 20 U.S.C. 7703a).
(b) Additional amount.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $10,000,000 shall be available for use by the Secretary of Defense to make payments to local educational agencies determined by the Secretary to have higher concentrations of military children with severe disabilities.
(c) Report.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the Department’s evaluation of each local educational agency with higher concentrations of military children with severe disabilities and subsequent determination of the amounts of impact aid each such agency shall receive.
(a) In general.—The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) shall staff elementary and secondary schools operated by the Activity so as to maintain, to the extent practicable, student-to-teacher ratios that do not exceed the maximum student-to-teacher ratios specified in subsection (b).
(a) Information on disputes regarding receipt of free appropriate public education by special needs dependents.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Each Secretary of a military department shall collect and maintain information on special education disputes filed by members of the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary.
(2) INFORMATION.—The information collected and maintained pursuant to this subsection shall include the following:
(b) Comptroller General of the United States study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the following:
(A) The consequences for a State or local educational agency of a finding of failure to provide a free appropriate public education to a military dependent.
(B) The manner in which local educational agencies with military families use the following:
(i) Funds received under section 7003(d) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(d)).
(ii) Funds authorized to be appropriated by annual national defense authorization Acts and made available for impact aid for child with severe disabilities under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (20 U.S.C. 7703a).
(iii) Funds authorized to be appropriated by annual national defense authorization Acts and made available for assistance to schools with significant number of military dependent students under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(C) The efficacy of attorney and other legal support for military families in special education disputes.
(2) RECOMMENDATIONS.—In conducting the study, the Comptroller General shall develop recommendations on the following:
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “free appropriate public education” includes appropriate special education and related services required under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.)
(2) The term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).
(3) The term “special education dispute” means a complaint filed regarding the education provided a child with a disability (as defined in section 602 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401), including a complaint filed in accordance with section 615 or 639 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1415, 1439).
(a) Pilot program required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program on permitting dependents of members of the Armed Forces on active duty to enroll in the Department of Defense Education Activity Virtual High School program (in this section referred to as the “DVHS program”).
(b) Participants.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Participants in the pilot program shall be selected by the Secretary from among dependents of members of the Armed Forces on active duty who—
(c) Reports.—
(1) INTERIM REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives an interim report on the pilot program.
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the completion of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the committees of Congress referred to in paragraph (1) a final report on the pilot programs.
(3) ELEMENTS.—Each report under this subsection shall include the following:
(A) A description of the demographics of the dependents participating in the pilot program through the date of such report.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “rural area” has the meaning given the term in section 520 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1490).
(a) Pilot program required.—Beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program under which a dependent of a full-time, active-duty member of the Armed Forces may enroll in a covered DODEA school at the military installation to which the member is assigned, on a space-available basis as described in subsection (c), without regard to whether the member resides on the installation as described in 2164(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Purposes.—The purposes of the pilot program under this section are—
(c) Enrollment on space-available basis.—A student participating in the pilot program under this section may be enrolled in a covered DODEA school only if the school has the capacity to accept the student, as determined by the Director of the Department of Defense Education Activity.
(d) Locations.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the pilot program under this section at not more than four military installations at which covered DODEA schools are located. The Secretary shall select military installations for participation in the pilot program based on—
(e) Termination.—The authority to carry out the pilot program under this section shall terminate four years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Report required.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment by the Comptroller General of the structural condition of schools of the Department of Defense Education Activity, both within the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS).
(b) Virtual schools.—The report shall include an assessment of the virtual infrastructure or other means by which students attend Department of Defense Education Activity schools that have no physical structure, including the satisfaction of the military families concerned with such infrastructure or other means.
Section 1791 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(b) Responsibility for allocations of certain funds.—The Secretary of Defense shall be responsible for the allocation of Office of the Secretary of Defense level funds for military child development programs for children from birth through 12 years of age, and may not delegate such responsibility to the military departments.”.
Section 1781c of title 10, United States Code is amended—
(3) in subsection (d)—
(B) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
“(C) Ability to request a second review of the approved assignment within or outside the continental United States if the member believes the location is inappropriate for the member's family and would cause undue hardship.
“(D) Protection from having a medical recommendation for an approved assignment overriden by the commanding officer.
(C) in paragraph (4), by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
“(H) Procedures to right-size the Department's Exceptional Family Member Program to ensure efficient and effective enrollment, for sufficient staffing dedicated to providing family support services, to include comprehensive training, education and outreach services, and sufficient oversight and administrative support for effective program operation.
(4) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and
(5) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection:
“(f) Metrics.—The Secretary of Defense shall implement performance metrics for measuring, across the Department and with respect to each military department, the following:
“(1) Assignment coordination and support for military families with special needs, including a systematic process for evaluating each military department’s program for the support of military families with special needs.
Section 1781c(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 572(3)(C) of this Act, is further amended—
(1) in subparagraph (F), by striking “of an individualized services plan (medical and educational)” and inserting “by an appropriate office of an individualized services plan (whether medical, educational, or both)”;
(a) In general.—Section 453 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(g) Reimbursement of qualifying spouse relicensing costs incident to a member’s permanent change of station or assignment.— (1) From amounts otherwise made available for a fiscal year to provide travel and transportation allowances under this chapter, the Secretary concerned may reimburse a member of the armed forces for qualified relicensing costs of the spouse of the member when—
“(A) the member is reassigned, either as a permanent change of station or permanent change of assignment, between duty stations located in separate jurisdictions with unique licensing or certification requirements and authorities; and
“(B) the movement of the member’s dependents is authorized at the expense of the United States under this section as part of the reassignment.
“(2) Reimbursement provided to a member under this subsection may not exceed $1000 in connection with each reassignment described in paragraph (1).
“(3) No reimbursement may be provided under this subsection for qualified relicensing costs paid or incurred after December 31, 2024.
“(4) In this subsection, the term ‘qualified relicensing costs’ means costs, including exam, continuing education courses, and registration fees, incurred by the spouse of a member if—
“(A) the spouse was licensed or certified in a profession during the member’s previous duty assignment and requires a new license or certification to engage in that profession in a new jurisdiction because of movement described in paragraph (1)(B) in connection with the member’s change in duty location pursuant to reassignment described in paragraph (1)(A); and
(a) Improvements required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, consistent with recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States in Government Accountability Office report GA0–20–110, take actions in accordance with this section in order to improve the efforts of the Department of Defense to track and respond to incidents of child abuse involving dependents of members of the Armed Forces that occur on military installations (in this section referred to as “covered incidents of child abuse”).
(b) Data collection and tracking of incidents of child abuse.—
(1) TRACKING OF NON-CAREGIVER ABUSE.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a process for the Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program to track reported covered incidents of child abuse in which the alleged offender is not a parent, guardian, or someone in a caregiving role at the time of the incident. The information so tracked shall comport with the information tracked by the Department of Defense in reported covered incidents of child abuse in which the alleged offender is a parent, guardian, or someone in a caregiving role at the time of the incident.
(2) CENTRALIZED DATABASE FOR TRACKING OF INCIDENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall develop and maintain in the Department of Defense a centralized database to track information across the Department on all covered incidents of child abuse that are reported to the Family Advocacy Program or investigated by a military criminal investigation organization, regardless of whether the alleged offender was another child, an adult, or someone in a non-caregiving role at the time of an incident.
(B) ELEMENTS.—The centralized database required by this paragraph shall include, for each incident within the database, the following:
(i) Information pertinent to a determination by the Family Advocacy Program whether such incident meets the criteria of the Department for treatment as an incident of child abuse.
(C) ANNUAL REPORTS ON INFORMATION.—The information collected and maintained in the centralized database shall be reported on an annual basis as part of the annual reports from the Family Advocacy Program on child abuse and domestic abuse in the military as required by section 574 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2141).
(3) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY GUIDANCE.—The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) shall issue clarifications of its guidance on the incidents of child-on-child abuse that qualify as serious incidents for purposes of requirements for the reporting of such serious incidents by school administrators to Activity leadership.
(c) Response procedures.—
(1) INCIDENT DETERMINATION COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP.—The Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program shall ensure that the voting membership of each Incident Determination Committee on a military installation includes medical personnel with the requisite knowledge and expertise to determine whether a reported covered incident of abuse meets the criteria of the Department of Defense for treatment as child abuse.
(2) SCREENING REPORTED INCIDENTS OF CHILD ABUSE.—
(A) DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDIZED PROCESS.—The Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program shall develop a standardized process by which the Family Advocacy Programs of the military departments screen reported covered incidents of child abuse to determine whether to present such incident to an Incident Determination Committee.
(B) MONITORING.—The Secretary of each military department shall develop a process to monitor the manner in which reported covered incidents of child abuse are screened by each installation under the jurisdiction of such Secretary in order to ensure that such screening complies with the standardized screening process developed pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(3) REQUIRED NOTIFICATIONS.—
(A) DOCUMENTATION.—The Secretary of each military department shall require that installation Family Advocacy Programs and military criminal investigation organizations under the jurisdiction of such Secretary document in their respective databases the date on which they notified the other of a reported covered incident of child abuse.
(B) OVERSIGHT.—The Secretary of each military department shall require that the Family Advocacy Program of such military department, and the headquarters of the military criminal investigation organizations of such military department, to develop processes to oversee the documentation of notifications required by subparagraph (A) in order to ensure that such notifications occur on a consistent basis at installation level.
(4) CERTIFIED PEDIATRIC SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAMINERS.—
(A) GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS FOR EXAMINERS.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall specify geographic regions in which military families reside for purposes of the availability of and access to certified pediatric sexual assault examiners in such regions.
(5) REMOVAL OF CHILDREN FROM UNSAFE HOMES OVERSEAS.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, issue policy that clarifies and standardizes across the Armed Forces the circumstances under which a commander may remove a child from a potentially unsafe home at an installation overseas.
(6) RESOURCE GUIDE FOR FAMILIES AFFECTED BY CHILD ABUSE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of each military department shall develop and maintain a comprehensive guide on resources available through the Department of Defense and such military department for military families under this jurisdiction of such Secretary who are affected by child abuse.
(B) ELEMENTS.—Each guide under this paragraph shall include the following:
(d) Coordination and collaboration with non-military resources.—
(1) COORDINATION WITH STATES.—The Secretary of Defense shall—
(2) COLLABORATION WITH NATIONAL CHILDREN’S ALLIANCE.—
(A) MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING.—The Secretary of each military department shall seek to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the National Children’s Alliance under which—
(B) PARTICIPATION OF CERTAIN ENTITIES.—Each memorandum of understanding under this paragraph shall provide for the appropriate participation of the Family Advocacy Program and military criminal investigation organizations of the military department concerned in activities under such memorandum of understanding.
(C) BRIEFING.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on the status of the development of a memorandum of understanding with the National Children’s Alliance under this paragraph, together with information on which installations, if any, under the jurisdiction of such Secretary have entered into a written agreement with a local children’s advocacy center with respect to child abuse on such installations.
(a) Center fees matters.—Section 1793 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:
“(c) Liberal issuance of hardship waivers.—The regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (a) shall require that installation commanders issue waivers of fees otherwise established under the regulations for inability to pay (commonly referred to as ‘hardship waivers’) on a liberal basis in a manner consistent (as specified by the Secretary in such regulations) with ensuring that fees collected pursuant to subsection (a) meet the operating expenses of the child development centers concerned.
“(d) Family discount.—In the case of a family with two or more children attending a child development center, the regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (a) shall require that installations commanders charge a fee for attendance at the center of any child of the family after the first child of the family in amount equal to 85 percent of the amount of the fee otherwise chargeable for the attendance of such child at the center.”.
(b) Child care fee assistance programs throughout the Armed Forces.—
(1) PROGRAMS AUTHORIZED.—Each Secretary of a military department may carry out a program for each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary under which a member of the Armed Forces who is obtaining child care services from a civilian child care services provider located off a military installation is paid (subject to any limitation established by such Secretary) a monthly amount equal to the amount, if any, by which—
(c) Additional actions To obtain qualified child care employees.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1792 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(B) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):
“(d) Additional actions To obtain qualified employees.—Each Secretary of a military department may, with the approval of the Secretary of Defense, take actions in addition to actions authorized by subsection (c) to provide military child development centers under the jurisdiction of such Secretary with a qualified and stable civilian workforce, including actions as follows:
(2) REPORTS ON INSTALLATIONS WITH EXTREME IMBALANCE BETWEEN DEMAND FOR AND AVAILABILITY OF CHILD CARE.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to Congress a report on the military installations under the jurisdiction of such Secretary with an extreme imbalance between demand for child care and availability of child care. Each report shall include, for the military department covered by such report, the following:
(A) The name of the five installations of the military department experiencing the most extreme imbalance between demand for child care and availability of child care.
(B) For each installation named pursuant to subparagraph (A), the following:
(i) An assessment whether civilian employees at child development centers at such installation have rates of pay and benefits that are competitive with other civilian employees on such installation and with the civilian labor pool in the vicinity of such installation.
(ii) A description and assessment of various incentives to encourage military spouses to become providers under the Family Child Care program at such installation.
(iii) Such recommendations at the Secretary of the military department concerned considers appropriate to address the imbalance between demand for child care and availability of child care at such installation, including recommendations to enhance the competitiveness of civilian child care positions at such installation with other civilian positions at such installation and the civilian labor pool in the vicinity of such installation.
Section 580F of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(1) by inserting “(a) Professional license or certification; Associate’s degree.—” before “The Secretary”;
(a) Policy and process required.—Not later than October 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a policy and process through which any covered person may request that the person’s name, personally identifying information, and other information pertaining to the person shall, in accordance with subsection (c), be corrected in, or expunged or otherwise removed from, the following:
(b) Covered persons.—For purposes of this section, a covered person is any person whose name was placed or reported, or is maintained—
(c) Elements.—The policy and process required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1) BASIS FOR CORRECTION OR EXPUNGEMENT.—That the name, personally identifying information, and other information of a covered person shall be corrected in, or expunged or otherwise removed from, a report, item or entry, or record described in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a) in the following circumstances:
(A) Probable cause did not or does not exist to believe that the offense for which the person’s name was placed or reported, or is maintained, in such report, item or entry, or record occurred, or insufficient evidence existed or exists to determine whether or not such offense occurred.
(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—While not dispositive as to the existence of a circumstance or basis set forth in paragraph (1), the following shall be considered in the determination whether such circumstance or basis applies to a covered person for purposes of this section:
(A) The extent or lack of corroborating evidence against the covered person concerned with respect to the offense at issue.
(3) PROCEDURES.—The policy and process required by subsection (a) shall include procedures as follows:
(A) Procedures under which a covered person may appeal a determination of the applicable component of the Department of Defense denying, whether in whole or in part, a request for purposes of subsection (a).
(B) Procedures under which the applicable component of the Department will correct, expunge or remove, take other appropriate action on, or assist a covered person in so doing, any record maintained by a person, organization, or entity outside of the Department to which such component provided, submitted, or transmitted information about the covered person, which information has or will be corrected in, or expunged or removed from, Department records pursuant to this section.
(d) Applicability.—The policy and process required to be developed by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall not be subject to the notice and comment rulemaking requirements under section 553 of title 5, United States Code.
(e) Report.—Not later than October 1, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the actions taken to carry out this section, including a comprehensive description of the policy and process developed and implemented by the Secretary under subsection (a).
(a) Members of regular and reserve components.—Subsection (d) of section 481 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(d) When surveys required.— (1) The Armed Forces Workplace and Gender Relations Surveys of the Active Duty and the Armed Forces Workplace and Gender Relations Survey of the Reserve Components shall each be conducted once every two years. The surveys may be conducted within the same year or in two separate years, and shall be conducted in a manner designed to reduce the burden of the surveys on members of the armed forces.
“(2) The two Armed Forces Workplace and Equal Opportunity Surveys shall be conducted at least once every four years. The surveys may be conducted within the same year or in two separate years, and shall be conducted in a manner designed to reduce the burden of the surveys on members of the armed forces.
“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may postpone the conduct of a survey under this section if the Secretary determines that conducting such survey is not practicable due to a war or national emergency declared by the President or Congress.
(b) Cadets and midshipmen.—
(1) UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY.—Section 7461(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may postpone the conduct of an assessment under this subsection if the Secretary determines that conducting such assessment is not practicable due to a war or national emergency declared by the President or Congress.
(2) UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY.—Section 8480(c) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may postpone the conduct of an assessment under this subsection if the Secretary determines that conducting such assessment is not practicable due to a war or national emergency declared by the President or Congress.
(3) UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY.—Section 9461(c) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may postpone the conduct of an assessment under this subsection if the Secretary determines that conducting such assessment is not practicable due to a war or national emergency declared by the President or Congress.
(c) Department of Defense civilian employees.—Section 481a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) Postponement.— (1) The Secretary of Defense may postpone the conduct of a survey under this section if the Secretary determines that conducting such survey is not practicable due to a war or national emergency declared by the President or Congress.
Section 1554a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(g) Sunset.— (1) On or after October 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense may sunset the Physical Disability Board of Review under this section.
“(2) If the Secretary sunsets the Physical Disability Board of Review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall transfer any remaining requests for review pending at that time, and shall assign any new requests for review under this section, to a board for the correction of military records operated by the Secretary concerned under section 1552 of this title..
(a) Elimination of reports for non-election years.—Section 105A(b) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (52 U.S.C. 20308(b)) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(b) Conforming amendments.—Subsection (b) of section 105A of such Act (52 U.S.C. 20308(b)) is amended—
(a) Pilot programs authorized.—The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force may each, in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, conduct a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of the development of a capability within the National Guard through which a National Guard of a State remotely provides State governments and National Guards of other States (whether or not in the same Armed Force as the providing National Guard) with cybersecurity technical assistance in training, preparation, and response to cyber incidents. If such Secretary elects to conduct such a pilot program, such Secretary shall be known as an “administering Secretary” for purposes of this section, and any reference in this section to “the pilot program” shall be treated as a reference to the pilot program conducted by such Secretary.
(b) Assessment prior to commencement.—For purposes of evaluating existing platforms, technologies, and capabilities under subsection (c), and for establishing eligibility and participation requirements under subsection (d), for purposes of the pilot program, an administering Secretary, in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, shall, prior to commencing the pilot program—
(c) Elements.—A pilot program under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A technical capability that enables the National Guard of a State to remotely provide cybersecurity technical assistance to State governments and National Guards of other States, without the need to deploy outside its home State.
(2) Policies, processes, procedures, and authorities for use of such a capability, including with respect to the following:
(A) The roles and responsibilities of both requesting and deploying State governments and National Guards with respect to such technical assistance, taking into account the matters specified in subsection (f).
(3) The conduct, in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, other Federal agencies, and appropriate non-Federal entities, of at least one exercise to demonstrate the capability, which exercise shall include the following:
(d) Use of existing technology.—An administering Secretary may use an existing platform, technology, or capability to provide the capability described in subsection (a) under the pilot program.
(e) Eligibility and participation requirements.—An administering Secretary shall, in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, establish requirements with respect to eligibility and participation of State governments and their National Guards in the pilot program.
(f) Construction with certain current authorities.—
(g) Evaluation metrics.—An administering Secretary shall, in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Secretary of Homeland Security, establish metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot program.
(h) Term.—A pilot program under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date that is three years after the date of the commencement of the pilot program.
(i) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the commencement of the pilot program, the administering Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a description of the pilot program and such other matters in connection with the pilot program as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the termination of the pilot program, the administering Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the pilot program. The report shall include the following:
(A) A description of the pilot program, including any partnerships entered into by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau under the pilot program.
(B) A summary of the assessment performed prior to the commencement of the pilot program in accordance with subsection (b).
(D) An assessment of the effectiveness of the pilot program, and of the capability described in subsection (a) under the pilot program.
(F) A recommendation as to the termination or extension of the pilot program, or the making of the pilot program permanent with an expansion nationwide.
(a) Briefing on plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives setting forth a plan for the performance of a funeral honors detail at the funeral of a deceased member of the Armed Forces by one or more members of the Armed Forces from an Armed Force other than that of the deceased when—
(2) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR ONE MEMBER OF ARMED FORCE OF DECEASED IN DETAIL.—Section 1491(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the first sentence by striking “, at least one of whom shall be a member of the armed force of which the veteran was a member”.
(3) PERFORMANCE.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall authorize the performance of funeral honors details by members of the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard under section 115 of title 32, United States Code, and may authorize the remainder of such details to consist of members of veterans organizations or other organizations approved for purposes of section 1491 of title 10, United States Code, as provided for by subsection (b)(2) of such section 1491.
The Secretary of the Army may not implement the Army Combat Fitness Test until the Secretary receives results of a study, conducted for purposes of this section by an entity independent of the Department of Defense, on the following:
(a) In general.—Not later than December 31, 2020, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the impact of the children of certain Filipino World War II veterans on the national security, foreign policy, and economic and humanitarian interests of the United States.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) The number of Filipino World War II veterans who fought under the United States flag during World War II to protect and defend the United States in the Pacific theater.
(2) The number of Filipino World War II veterans who died fighting under the United States flag during World War II to protect and defend the United States in the Pacific theater.
(3) An assessment of the economic and tax contributions that Filipino World War II veterans and their families have made to the United States.
(4) An assessment of the impact on the United States of exempting from the numerical limitations on immigrant visas the children of the Filipino World War II veterans who were naturalized under—
(A) section 405 of the Immigration Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–649; 8 U.S.C. 1440 note); or
(a) Per diem for duty outside the continental United States.—
(1) TRANSFER TO CHAPTER 7.—Section 475 of title 37, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 7 of such title, inserted after section 403b, and redesignated as section 405.
(b) Allowance for funeral honors duty.—
(c) Clerical amendments.—
(1) CHAPTER 7.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 of such title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(A) by inserting after the item relating to section 403b the following new item:
“405. Per diem while on duty outside the continental United States.”;
and
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall pay hazardous duty pay under this section to a member of a regular or reserve component of the Armed Forces who—
(b) Regulations.—Hazardous duty pay shall be payable under this section in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. Such regulations shall specify the duty in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 qualifying a member for payment of such pay under this section.
(c) Amount.—The amount of hazardous duty pay paid a member under this section shall be such amount per month, not less than $150 per month, as the Secretary of Defense shall specify in the regulations under subsection (b).
(e) Months for which payable.—Hazardous duty pay is payable under this section for qualifying duty performed in months occurring during the period—
(f) Construction with other pay.—Hazardous duty pay payable to a member under this section is in addition to the following:
(g) Sense of Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that the Secretary of Defense should also authorize hazardous duty pay for members of the Armed Forces not under orders specific to the response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 who provide—
(b) Credit for retired pay purposes.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The period of maternity leave taken by a member of the reserve components of the Armed Forces in connection with the birth of a child shall count toward the member's entitlement to retired pay, and in connection with the years of service used in computing retired pay, under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, as 12 points.
(2) SEPARATE CREDIT FOR EACH PERIOD OF LEAVE.—Separate crediting of points shall accrue to a member pursuant to this subsection for each period of maternity leave taken by the member in connection with a childbirth event.
(3) WHEN CREDITED.—Points credited a member for a period of maternity leave pursuant to this subsection shall be credited in the year in which the period of maternity leave concerned commences.
(4) CONTRIBUTION OF LEAVE TOWARD ENTITLEMENT TO RETIRED PAY.—Section 12732(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new subparagraph:
(a) Authorities relating To reserve forces.—Section 910(g) of title 37, United States Code, relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service, is amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
(b) Title 10 authorities relating to health care professionals.—The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”:
(c) Authorities relating to nuclear officers.—Section 333(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
(d) Authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities.—The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”:
(4) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.
(a) Accession bonus generally.—Subparagraph (A) of section 335(e)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “$30,000” and inserting “$100,000”.
(b) Accession bonus for critically short wartime specialties.—Subparagraph (B) of such section is amended by striking “$100,000” and inserting “$200,000”.
(c) Retention bonus.—Subparagraph (C) of such section is amended by striking “$75,000” and inserting “$150,000”.
(a) Entitlement to retired pay.—Section 12732(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new subparagraph:
“(F) (i) Subject to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to matters concerning the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Department of the Navy, one point for each day of active service or one point for each drill or period of equivalent instruction that was prescribed by the Secretary concerned to be performed during the covered emergency period, if such person was prevented from performing such duty due to travel or duty restrictions imposed by the President, the Secretary of Defense, or the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard.
(a) Change in priority of payments for retired or retainer pay.—Subsection (a) of section 12316 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(B) by striking “his earlier military service” and inserting “the Reserve's earlier military service”;
(b) Payments for pension or disability compensation.—Such section is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):
“(b) Except as provided by subsection (c), a Reserve of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard who because of the Reserve's earlier military service is entitled to a pension or disability compensation, and who performs duty for which the Reserve is entitled to compensation, may elect to receive for that duty either—
(c) Additional conforming and modernizing amendments.—Subsection (c) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is amended—
(2) by striking “his earlier military service” the first place it appears and inserting “a Reserve's earlier military service”;
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) On May 20, 2017, Lieutenant Richard W. Collins III was murdered on the campus of the University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
(2) At the time of his murder, Lieutenant Collins had graduated from the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps at Bowie State University and received a commission in the United States Army.
(3) At the time of the murder of Lieutenant Collins, a graduate of a Reserve Officers’ Training Corps who received a commission but died before receiving a first duty assignment was not eligible for a death gratuity under section 1475(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, or for casualty assistance under section 633 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (10 U.S.C. 1475 note).
(4) Section 623 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) amended section 1475 of title 10, United States Code, to authorize the payment of a death gratuity to a graduate of the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (SROTC) who receives a commission but dies before receiving a first duty assignment.
(5) Section 625 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 authorizes the families of Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps graduates to receive casualty assistance in the event of the death of such graduates.
(b) Applicability of laws.—
(1) DEATH GRATUITY.—Section 623 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), and the amendment made by that section, shall apply to Lieutenant Richard W. Collins III as if his death had occurred after the date of the enactment of that section.
(c) Limitation.—No amount exceeding 10 percent of a payment made under subsection (b)(1) may be paid to or received by any attorney or agent for services rendered in connection with the payment. Any person who violates this subsection shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided under title 18, United States Code.
(a) Permanent authority.—Section 914 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (5 U.S.C. 5911 note) is amended—
(b) Exclusion of certain shipyard employees.—Such section is further amended by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):
“(b) Exclusion of certain shipyard employees.—In carrying out a Government lodging program under the authority in subsection (a), the Secretary shall exclude from the requirements of the program employees who are traveling for the performance of mission functions of a public shipyard of the Department if the purpose or mission of such travel would be adversely affected by the requirements of the program.”.
(a) Clarification of activities for which approval required.—Section 908 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(2) in the heading of subsection (b), by inserting “for employment and compensation” after “Approval required”;
(4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):
“(c) Approval required for certain payments and awards.—A person described in subsection (a) may accept payment for speeches, travel, meals, lodging, or registration fees described in that subsection, or accept a non-cash award described in that subsection, only if the Secretary concerned approves the payment or award.”.
(b) Annual reports on approvals.—Subsection (d) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(3) of this section, is amended—
(2) in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by inserting “, and each approval under subsection (c) for a payment or award described in subsection (a),” after “in subsection (a)”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
Section 1079(a)(12) of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the first sentence, by striking “or certified clinical social worker,” and inserting “certified clinical social worker, or other class of provider as designated by the Secretary of Defense,”.
Section 1079b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):
“(b) Waiver of fees.—Under the procedures implemented under subsection (a), a military medical treatment facility may waive a fee charged under such procedures to a civilian who is not a covered beneficiary if—
(a) Plan.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to protect and promote the mental health and well-being of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents, which shall include the following:
(1) A strategy to combat existing stigma surrounding mental health conditions that might deter such individuals from seeking care.
(2) Guidance to commanding officers at all levels on the mental health ramifications of the COVID–19 crisis.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide to a member of the National Guard separating from active service after serving on full-time National Guard duty pursuant to section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, the health benefits authorized under section 1145 of title 10, United States Code, for a member of a reserve component separating from active duty, as referred to in subsection (a)(2)(B) of such section 1145, if the active service from which the member of the National Guard is separating was in support of the whole of government response to the coronavirus (COVID–19).
(a) Demonstration project required.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall commence the conduct of a demonstration project designed to evaluate the cost, quality of care, and impact on maternal and fetal outcomes of using extramedical maternal health providers under the TRICARE program to determine the appropriateness of making coverage of such providers under the TRICARE program permanent.
(b) Elements of demonstration project.—The demonstration project under subsection (a) shall include, for participants in the demonstration project, the following:
(c) Participants.—The Secretary shall establish a process under which covered beneficiaries may enroll in the demonstration project in order to receive the services provided under the demonstration project.
(d) Duration.—The Secretary shall carry out the demonstration project for a period of five years beginning on the date on which notification of the commencement of the demonstration project is published in the Federal Register.
(e) Survey.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for the duration of the demonstration project, the Secretary shall administer a survey to determine—
(2) MATTERS COVERED BY THE SURVEY.—The survey administered under paragraph (1) shall include an identification of the following:
(A) The race, ethnicity, age, sex, relationship status, military service, military occupation, and rank, as applicable, of each individual surveyed.
(B) If individuals surveyed were members of the Armed Forces or the spouses of such members, or both.
(f) Reports.—
(1) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan to implement the demonstration project.
(2) ANNUAL REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the commencement of the demonstration project, and annually thereafter for the duration of the demonstration project, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the cost of the demonstration project and the effectiveness of the demonstration project in improving quality of care and the maternal and fetal outcomes of covered beneficiaries enrolled in the demonstration project.
(B) MATTERS COVERED.—Each report submitted under subparagraph (A) shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(ii) The number of enrolled covered beneficiaries who have participated in the demonstration project.
(ix) The estimated costs avoided as a result of improved maternal and fetal health outcomes due to the demonstration project.
(g) Expansion of demonstration project.—
(1) REGULATIONS.—If the Secretary determines that the demonstration project is successful, the Secretary may prescribe regulations to include extramedical maternal health providers as health care providers authorized to provide care under the TRICARE program.
(2) CREDENTIALING AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary may establish credentialing and other requirements for doulas and lactation consultants through public notice and comment rulemaking for purposes of including doulas and lactation consultations as health care providers authorized to provide care under the TRICARE program pursuant to regulations prescribed under paragraph (1).
(a) Requirement.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program under which eligible covered beneficiaries may elect to receive non-generic prescription maintenance medications selected under subsection (c) through military treatment facility pharmacies, retail pharmacies, or the national mail-order pharmacy program, notwithstanding section 1074g(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Duration.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program for a three-year period beginning not later than March 1, 2021.
(c) Selection of medication.—The Secretary shall select non-generic prescription maintenance medications described in section 1074g(a)(9)(C)(i) of title 10, United States Code, to be covered by the pilot program.
(d) Use of voluntary rebates.—
(1) REQUIREMENT.—In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall seek to renew and modify contracts described in paragraph (2) in a manner that—
(e) Notification.—In providing each eligible covered beneficiary with an explanation of benefits, the Secretary shall notify the beneficiary of whether the medication that the beneficiary is prescribed is covered by the pilot program.
(f) Briefing and reports.—
(1) BRIEFING.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on the implementation of the pilot program.
(2) INTERIM REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the commencement of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program.
(3) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2024, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program.
(B) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
(i) The number of eligible covered beneficiaries who participated in the pilot program and an assessment of the satisfaction of such beneficiaries with the pilot program.
(ii) The rate by which eligible covered beneficiaries elected to receive non-generic prescription maintenance medications at a retail pharmacy pursuant to the pilot program, and how such rate affected military treatment facility pharmacies and the national mail-order pharmacy program.
(g) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section may be construed to affect the ability of the Secretary to carry out section 1074g(a)(9)(C) of title 10, United States Code, after the date on which the pilot program is completed.
(a) Delay of transfer.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1073c(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “September 30, 2022” and inserting “September 30, 2024”.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 737 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended, in subsections (a) and (c), by striking “September 30, 2022” and inserting “September 30, 2024” each place it appears.
(b) Modification To resources preserved.—Such section 737 is amended—
(d) Change of name of Command.—
(1) DELAY OF TRANSFER.—Section 1073c(e)(1)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Materiel” and inserting “Development”.
(2) PRESERVATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND PERSONNEL.—Section 737 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
Section 713(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 5 U.S.C. 8951 note) is amended by striking “January 1, 2022” and inserting “January 1, 2023”.
(a) In general.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1073d the following new section:
Ҥ 1073e. Authority to waive requirements during national emergencies
“(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this section is to enable the Secretary of Defense to ensure, to the maximum extent feasible, in an emergency area during an emergency period—
“(b) Authority.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—To the extent necessary to accomplish the purpose specified in subsection (a), the Secretary, subject to the provisions of this section, may, for a period of 60 days, waive or modify the application of the requirements of this chapter or any regulation prescribed thereunder with respect to health care items and services furnished by a health care provider (or class of health care providers) in an emergency area (or portion of such area) during an emergency period (or portion of such period), including by deferring the termination of status of a covered beneficiary.
“(c) Implementation.—The Secretary may implement any temporary waiver or modification made pursuant to this section by program instruction or otherwise.
“(d) Retroactive application.—A waiver or modification made pursuant to this section with respect to an emergency period may, at the discretion of the Secretary, be made retroactive to the beginning of the emergency period or any subsequent date in such period specified by the Secretary.
“(e) Satisfaction of preconditions for status as covered beneficiary.—A deferral under subsection (b) of termination of status of a covered beneficiary may be contingent upon retroactive satisfaction by such beneficiary of any premium or enrollment fee payments or other preconditions for such status.
“(f) Certification.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than two days before exercising a waiver or modification under subsection (b)(1) or renewing a waiver or modification under subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a certification and advance written notice regarding the authority to be exercised.
“(g) Termination of waiver.—A waiver or modification of requirements pursuant to this section terminates upon the termination of the applicable emergency declaration.
“(h) Report.—Not later than one year after the end of an emergency period during which the Secretary exercised the authority under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the approaches used to accomplish the purpose described in subsection (a), including an evaluation of such approaches and recommendations for improved approaches should the need for the exercise of such authority arise in the future.
“(i) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) EMERGENCY AREA.—The term ‘emergency area’ means a geographical area covered by an emergency declaration.
“(2) EMERGENCY DECLARATION.—The term ‘emergency declaration’ means—
“(A) an emergency or disaster declared by the President pursuant to the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) or the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.); or
“(B) a public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1073d the following new item:
“1073e. Authority to waive requirements during national emergencies.”.
Section 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2573), as most recently amended by section 732(4)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2021” and inserting “September 30, 2022”.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Health Agency, shall implement a comprehensive program to be known as the “Military Health System Clinical Quality Management Program” (in this section referred to as the “Program”).
(b) Elements of program.—The Program shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) The implementation of systematic procedures to eliminate, to the maximum extent feasible, risk of harm to patients at military medical treatment facilities, including through identification, investigation, and analysis of events indicating a risk of patient harm and corrective action plans to mitigate such risks.
(2) With respect to a potentially compensable event (including those involving members of the Armed Forces) at a military medical treatment facility—
(A) an analysis of such event, which shall occur and be documented as soon as possible after the event;
(C) reporting of such event to the National Practitioner Data Bank in accordance with guidelines of the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (42 U.S.C. 11101 et seq.), giving special emphasis to the results of external peer reviews of the event.
(3) Validation of provider credentials and granting of clinical privileges by the Director of the Defense Health Agency for all health care providers at a military medical treatment facility.
(4) Accreditation of military medical treatment facilities by a recognized external accreditation body.
(5) Systematic measurement of indicators of health care quality, emphasizing clinical outcome measures, comparison of such indicators with benchmarks from leading health care quality improvement organizations, and transparency with the public of appropriate clinical measurements for military medical treatment facilities.
(6) Systematic activities emphasized by leadership at all organizational levels to use all elements of the Program to eliminate unwanted variance throughout the health care system of the Department of Defense and make constant improvements in clinical quality.
(7) A full range of procedures for productive communication between patients and health care providers regarding actual or perceived adverse clinical events at military medical treatment facilities, including procedures—
(c) Additional clinical quality management activities.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the elements of the Program set forth in subsection (b), the Secretary shall establish and maintain clinical quality management activities in relation to functions of the health care system of the Department separate from delivery of health care services in military medical treatment facilities.
(2) HEALTH CARE DELIVERY OUTSIDE MILITARY MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITIES.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall maintain policies and procedures to promote clinical quality in health care delivery on ships and planes, in deployed settings, and in all other circumstances not covered by subsection (b), with the objective of implementing standards and procedures comparable, to the extent practicable, to those under such subsection.
Section 740 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by striking “The Secretary of Defense may” and inserting “Beginning not later than September 30, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall”; and
(2) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsections:
“(c) Lead official for design and implementation of pilot program.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs shall be the lead official for design and implementation of the pilot program under subsection (a).
“(2) RESOURCES.—The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs shall leverage the resources of the Defense Health Agency for execution of the pilot program under subsection (a) and shall coordinate with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff throughout the planning and duration of the pilot program.
“(d) Locations.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) at not fewer than five locations in the United States that are located at or near locations with established expertise in disaster health preparedness and response and trauma care that augment and enhance the effectiveness of the pilot program.
“(2) PHASED SELECTION OF LOCATIONS.—
“(A) INITIAL SELECTION.—Not later than the earlier of the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act or March 31, 2021, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Transportation, shall select not fewer than two locations at which to carry out the pilot program.
“(B) SUBSEQUENT SELECTION.—Not later than the end of each one-year period following selection of locations under subparagraph (A), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Transportation, shall select not fewer than two additional locations at which to carry out the pilot program until not fewer than five locations are selected in total.
“(3) CONSIDERATION AND PRIORITY FOR LOCATIONS.—In selecting locations for the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
“(A) consider—
“(i) the proximity of the location to civilian or military transportation hubs, including airports, railways, interstate highways, or ports;
“(iii) the ability of the location to provide trauma care training opportunities for medical personnel of the Department of Defense; and
“(iv) the proximity of the location to existing academic medical centers of institutions of higher education, facilities of the Department, or other institutions that have established expertise in the areas of—
“(VI) the National Disaster Medical System under section 2812 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300hh–11);
“(B) give priority to public-private partnerships with academic medical centers of institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other entities with facilities that have an established history of providing clinical care, treatment, training, and research in the areas described in subparagraph (A)(ii) or other specializations determined important by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program.”;
(4) in subsection (g), as redesignated by paragraph (3)—
(5) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(h) Institution of higher education defined.—In this section, the term ‘institution of higher education’ means a four-year institution of higher education, as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)).”.
(a) Study required.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center or other independent entity to perform a study on force mix options and service models (including traditional and nontraditional active and reserve models) to optimize the readiness of the medical force of the Armed Forces to deliver combat care on the battlefield.
(b) Issues To be addressed.—The study required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum—
(1) with respect to options relating to members of the Armed Forces on active duty—
(A) a review of existing models for such members who are medical professionals to support clinical readiness skills by serving in civilian trauma centers;
(2) with respect to options relating to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces—
(A) a review of existing models for such members of the reserve components who are medical professionals to support clinical readiness skills by serving in civilian trauma centers;
(a) In general.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the delivery of Federal, State, and private mental health services to members of the reserve components.
(b) Elements.—The study conducted under subsection (a) shall—
(1) identify all programs, coverage, and costs associated with services described in such subsection;
(2) specify gaps or barriers to access that could result in delayed or insufficient mental health care support to members of the reserve components.
(a) Review required.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of efforts by the Department of Defense to prevent suicide among members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations.
(b) Elements of review.—The review conducted under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of each of the following:
(1) Current policy guidelines of the Armed Forces on the prevention of suicide among members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations.
(2) Current suicide prevention programs of the Armed Forces and activities for members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents, including programs provided by the Defense Health Program and the Office of Suicide Prevention.
(3) The integration of mental health screenings and suicide risk and prevention efforts for members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents into the delivery of primary care for such members and dependents.
(4) The standards for responding to attempted or completed suicides among members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents, including guidance and training to assist commanders in addressing incidents of attempted or completed suicide within their units.
(5) The standards regarding data collection for members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents, including related factors such as domestic violence and child abuse.
(6) The means to ensure the protection of privacy of members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations and their dependents who seek or receive treatment related to suicide prevention.
(7) The availability of information from indigenous populations on suicide prevention for members of the Armed Forces stationed at covered installations who are members of such a population.
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall commence the conduct of an audit of the medical conditions of eligible individuals and the association between adverse exposures of such individuals in unsafe or unhealthy housing units and the health of such individuals.
(b) Content of audit.—The audit conducted under subsection (a) shall—
(1) determine the percentage of units of privatized military housing that are unsafe or unhealthy housing units;
(c) Conduct of audit.—The Inspector General of the Department shall conduct the audit under subsection (a) using the same privacy preserving guidelines used by the Inspector General in conducting other audits of health records.
(d) Source of data.—In conducting the audit under subsection (a), the Inspector General of the Department shall use—
(e) Submittal and public availability of report.—Not later than one year after the commencement of the audit under subsection (a), the Inspector General of the Department shall—
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—The term “eligible individual” means a member of the Armed Forces or a family member of a member of the Armed Forces who has resided in an unsafe or unhealthy housing unit.
(2) PRIVATIZED MILITARY HOUSING.—The term “privatized military housing” means military housing provided under subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on prenatal and postpartum mental health conditions among members of the Armed Forces and dependents of such members.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The study required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An assessment of the extent to which beneficiaries under the TRICARE program, including members of the Armed Forces and dependents of such members, are diagnosed with prenatal or postpartum mental health conditions, including—
(B) A demographic assessment of the population included in the study with respect to race, ethnicity, sex, age, relationship status, military service, military occupation, and rank, where applicable.
(C) An assessment of the status of prenatal and postpartum mental health care for beneficiaries under the TRICARE program, including those who seek care at military medical treatment facilities and those who rely on civilian providers.
(D) An assessment of the ease or delay for beneficiaries under the TRICARE program in obtaining treatment for prenatal and postpartum mental health conditions, including—
(b) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the findings of the study conducted under subsection (a), including—
(a) In general.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to evaluate flexible spending account options that allow pre-tax payment of health and dental insurance premiums, out-of-pocket health care expenses, and dependent care expenses for members of the uniformed services and their family members, including an identification of any legislative or administrative barriers to achieving the implementation of such options.
(a) Assessment.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall complete an assessment of the provision by the Department of Defense of emergency medical treatment to civilians who are not covered beneficiaries at military medical treatment facilities during the period beginning on October 1, 2015, and ending on September 30, 2020.
(b) Elements of assessment.—The assessment completed under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to civilians who received emergency medical treatment at a military medical treatment facility during the period specified in such paragraph, the following:
(2) The amount of medical debt from such treatment that was garnished from such civilians, categorized by garnishment from Social Security benefits, tax refunds, wages, or other financial asset.
(6) The number of such civilians from whom such medical debt was collected who did not possess medical insurance at the time of such treatment.
(7) The number of such civilians from whom such medical debt was collected who collected Social Security benefits at the time of such treatment.
(8) The number of such civilians from whom such medical debt was collected who, at the time of such treatment, earned—
(9) An assessment of the process through which military medical treatment facilities seek to recover unpaid medical debt from such civilians, including whether the Department of Defense contracts with private debt collectors to recover such unpaid medical debt.
(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the completion of the assessment under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the assessment.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) COVERED BENEFICIARY.—The term “covered beneficiary” has the meaning given that term in section 1072(5) of title 10, United States Code.
(3) POVERTY LINE.—The term “poverty line” has the meaning given that term in section 673 of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902).
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) Through the TRICARE program, the Department of Defense provides health care benefits and services to approximately 9,500,000 beneficiaries.
(2) The Department of Defense is not structured as a typical health care provider, which can lead to complicated billing practices and strict deadlines for members of the Armed Forces, former members of the Armed Forces, and their dependents, as well as for providers.
(3) Numerous findings issued by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense between 2014 and 2019 describe the third-party collection program of the Department as inadequately managed, resulting in substantial uncollected funds that could be used to improve the quality of health care at military medical treatment facilities.
(4) Numerous press reports have found that the Federal Government aggressively collects unpaid debts from uninsured or low-income civilian patients who happen to receive treatment at a military medical treatment facility, even though providing that treatment often benefits military readiness by providing experience to military medical professionals.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that it is in the national interest of the United States to ensure members of the Armed Forces, former members of the Armed Forces, and their dependents receive high-quality health care, and that Federal agencies prioritize fairness and accessibility when administering health care.
(c) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report assessing the billing practices of the Department of Defense for care received under the TRICARE program or at military medical treatment facilities.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of the extent to which data is being collected and maintained on whether beneficiaries under the TRICARE program have other forms of health insurance.
(B) A description of the extent to which the Secretary of Defense has implemented the recommendations of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense to improve collections of third-party payments for care at military medical treatment facilities and a description of the impact such implementation has had on such beneficiaries.
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall provide to a veteran read-only access to the documents of the veteran contained in the Individual Longitudinal Exposure Record in a printable format through a portal accessible through a website of the Department of Veterans Affairs and a website of the Department of Defense.
(a) Study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute, shall conduct a study on cancer among covered individuals in two phases as provided in this subsection.
(2) PHASE 1.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Under the initial phase of the study conducted under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall determine if there is a higher incidence of cancers occurring for covered individuals as compared to similar age groups in the general population through the use of the database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute.
(3) PHASE 2.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—If, pursuant to the initial phase of the study under paragraph (2), the Secretary concludes that there is an increased rate of cancers among covered individuals, the Secretary shall conduct a second phase of the study under which the Secretary shall do the following:
(i) Identify the carcinogenic toxins or hazardous materials associated with military flight operations from shipboard or land bases or facilities, such as fuels, fumes, and other liquids.
(ii) Identify the operating environments, including frequencies or electromagnetic fields, where exposure to ionizing radiation (associated with high altitude flight) and nonionizing radiation (associated with airborne, ground, and shipboard radars) occurred in which covered individuals could have received increased radiation amounts.
(iii) Identify, for each covered individual, duty stations, dates of service, aircraft flown, and additional duties (including Landing Safety Officer, Catapult and Arresting Gear Officer, Air Liaison Officer, Tactical Air Control Party, or personnel associated with aircraft maintenance, supply, logistics, fuels, or transportation) that could have increased the risk of cancer for such covered individual.
(iv) Determine locations where a covered individual served or additional duties of a covered individual that are associated with higher incidences of cancers.
(B) DATA.—The Secretary shall format all data included in the study conducted under this paragraph in accordance with the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute, including by disaggregating such data by race, gender, and age.
(C) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the submittal of the report under paragraph (2)(B), if the Secretary conducts the second phase of the study under this paragraph, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the findings of the study conducted under this paragraph.
(4) USE OF DATA FROM PREVIOUS STUDIES.—In conducting the study under this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall incorporate data from previous studies conducted by the Air Force, the Navy, or the Marine Corps that are relevant to the study under this subsection, including data from the comprehensive study conducted by the Air Force identifying each covered individual and documenting the cancers, dates of diagnoses, and mortality of each covered individual.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) ARMED FORCES.—The term “Armed Forces”—
(3) COVERED INDIVIDUAL.—The term “covered individual”—
(A) means an aviator or aviation support personnel who—
(ii) receives benefits under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code; and
(B) includes any air crew member of fixed-wing aircraft and personnel supporting generation of the aircraft, including pilots, navigators, weapons systems operators, aircraft system operators, personnel associated with aircraft maintenance, supply, logistics, fuels, or transportation, and any other crew member who regularly flies in an aircraft or is required to complete the mission of the aircraft.
This subtitle may be cited as the “Care and Readiness Enhancement for Reservists Act of 2020” or the “CARE for Reservists Act of 2020”.
(a) Readjustment counseling.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 1712A of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(D) (i) The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, may furnish to any member of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who has a behavioral health condition or psychological trauma, counseling under subparagraph (A)(i), which may include a comprehensive individual assessment under subparagraph (B)(i).
(a) In general.—Subchapter VIII of chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1788 the following new item:
“1789. Mental health services for members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces.”.
(a) Suicide prevention program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1720F of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is further amended—
(B) in subsection (b), by striking “veterans” each place it appears and inserting “covered individuals”;
(D) in subsection (d), by striking “to veterans” each place it appears and inserting “to covered individuals”;
(E) in subsection (e), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “veterans” and inserting “covered individuals”;
(I) in subsection (i)—
(J) in subsection (j)—
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking “veterans” each place it appears and inserting “covered individuals”; and
(3) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Such section is further amended, in the section heading, by inserting “and members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces” after “veterans”.
(b) Mental health treatment for individuals who served in classified missions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1720H of such title is amended—
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Such section is further amended, in the section heading, by inserting “and members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces” after “veterans”.
(a) In general.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report that includes an assessment of the following:
(1) The increase, as compared to the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, of the number of members of the Armed Forces that use readjustment counseling or outpatient mental health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs, disaggregated by State, Vet Center location, and clinical care site of the Department, as appropriate.
(2) The number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces receiving telemental health care from the Department.
(3) The increase, as compared to the day before the date of the enactment of this Act, of the annual cost associated with readjustment counseling and outpatient mental health care provided by the Department to members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces.
(a) Submission of recommendations to Secretary of Defense.—In order to fully implement the July 21, 2017, Presidential Executive Order on Assessing and Strengthening the Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain Resiliency of the United States, not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a series of recommendations regarding United States industrial policies. The recommendations shall consist of specific executive actions, programmatic changes, regulatory changes, and legislative proposals and changes, as appropriate.
(b) Scope of assessment.—In developing the recommendations required under subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall assess—
(d) Consultation.—In assessing the areas specified in subsection (b) and developing the recommendations required under subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall consult or inaugurate studies with, as appropriate, the Joint Industrial Base Working Group, the Defense Science Board, the Defense Innovation Board, economists, commercial industry, and federally funded research and development centers.
(e) Submission of recommendations to President.—Not later than 30 days after receiving the recommendations under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit the recommendations, together with any additional views or recommendations, to the President, the Office of Management and Budget, the National Security Council, and the National Economic Council.
(a) In general.—Not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Secretary of Defense an assessment of the economic forces and structures shaping the capacity of the national security innovation base and policy recommendations pertaining to the outcome of such assessment.
(b) Elements.—The assessment required under subsection (a) shall review the following matters as they pertain to the innovative and manufacturing capacity of the national security innovation base:
(2) Immigration policy, including the policies germane to the attraction and retention of skilled immigrants.
(7) The tax code and its effect on investment, including the Federal research and development tax credit.
(8) Deregulation in critical economic sectors, land use, environment review, and construction and manufacturing activities.
(c) Engagement with certain entities.—In conducting the assessment required under subsection (a), the Deputy Secretary shall engage through appropriate mechanisms with the Defense Science Board, the Defense Innovation Board, the Defense Business Board, academic experts, commercial industry, and federally funded research and development centers.
(d) Submission of assessment.—Not later than 30 days after receiving the assessment and recommendations under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit the assessment, together with recommendations and any additional views of the Secretary, to the President, the Office of Management and Budget, the National Security Council, the National Economic Council, and the congressional defense committees.
(a) National technology and industrial base implementation.—
(1) ASSESSMENT OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, MANUFACTURING, AND PRODUCTION CAPABILITIES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—In developing the strategy required by section 2501 of title 10, United States Code, carrying out the analysis of the national technology and industrial base required by section 2503 of such title, and performing the periodic assessments required under section 2505 of such title, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Under Secretary of Research and Engineering, assess the research and development, manufacturing, and production capabilities of entities within the United States and non-United States members of the national technology and industrial base as well as other friendly nations.
(B) IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC TECHNOLOGIES, COMPANIES, LABORATORIES, AND FACTORIES.—The assessment shall include identification of specific technologies, companies, laboratories, and factories of or located in the United States and the non-United States members of the national technology and industrial base of potential value to current and future Department of Defense plans and programs.
(2) POLICY AND GUIDANCE.—Consistent with section 2440 of title 10, United States Code, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall develop and promulgate to the service and command acquisition executives, the heads of the appropriate defense agencies and field activities, and relevant program managers acquisition policy and guidance germane to the use of the research and development, manufacturing, and production capabilities identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(B) and the technologies, companies, laboratories, and factories in specific Department of Defense research and development, international cooperative research, procurement, and sustainment activities.
(b) Cooperative research and development.—
(1) AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITH NATIONS IN THE NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL BASE.—Section 2350a(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
(2) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to conform with subparagraph (F) of section 2350a(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1).
(c) Regulatory council.—Section 2502 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection:
“(e) National Technology and Industrial Base Regulatory Council.—
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Chairman of the National Defense Technology and Industrial Base Council shall work with the equivalent designees in the countries that comprise the national technology and industrial base to establish the National Technology and Industrial Base Regulatory Council.
“(2) MEETINGS.—The National Technology and Industrial Base Regulatory Council shall meet biannually to harmonize respective policies and regulations, and to propose new legislation and regulations that increase the integration between the policies, persons, and organizations comprising the national technology and industrial base.
“(3) DUTIES.—The National Technology and Industrial Base Regulatory Council shall—
“(A) address and review issues related to industrial security, supply chain security, cybersecurity, regulating foreign direct investment and foreign ownership, control and influence mitigation, market research, technology assessment, and research cooperation within public and private research and development organizations and universities, technology and export control measures, acquisition processes and oversight, and management best practices; and
(d) Recommendations for additional members of the national technology and industrial base.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a process to consider the inclusion of additional member nations in the national technology and industrial base.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The process developed under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) analysis of the national security costs and benefits to the United States and allies of the inclusion of such additional member nation in the national technology and industrial base;
(B) analysis of the economic costs and benefits to entities within the United States and allies of the inclusion of such additional member nation into the national technology and industrial base, including an assessment of—
(3) RECOMMENDED LEGISLATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may submit legislative proposals to Congress to add new nations to the national technology and industrial base.
(4) REPORT.—Not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report with recommendations regarding whether to include in the national technology and industrial base each country with which the United States maintains a mutual defense treaty, a reciprocal defense procurement agreement, or other defense cooperation agreement. The report shall be based on assessments conducted using the process established under paragraph (1) and shall include, for each country recommended for inclusion, the information specified in paragraph (3)(B).
Section 2509 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 845(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(2)—
(A) in subparagraph (A)—
(B) in subparagraph (C)—
(iii) by inserting after clause (x) the following new clause:
“(xi) processes and procedures related to supply chain risk management, including those implemented pursuant to section 806 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note); and”; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(E) Characterization and assessment of industrial base support policies, programs, and procedures, including—
“(i) limitations and acquisition guidance relevant to the national technology and industrial base (as defined in section 2500(1) of this title);
“(iii) the Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment program, including direct support and common design activities;
“(vi) programs related to the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4511 et seq.);
(a) Assessments.—The Secretary of Defense shall define intelligence and other information requirements, sources, and organizational responsibilities for assessing foreign adversary technological and industrial bases and conducting comparative analyses of such technological and industrial bases. The requirements, sources, and responsibilities shall include—
(1) examining the competitive advantages foreign adversaries are pursuing, including with respect to regulation, raw materials, educational capacity, labor, and capital accessibility;
(2) assessing relative cost, speed of product development, age and value of the installed capital base, leadership’s technical competence and agility, nationally imposed inhibiting conditions, the availability of human and material resources, and the burdens of government oversight;
(b) Methodology.—The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Policy shall incorporate inputs pursuant to subsection (a) as part of a methodology to continuously assess domestic and foreign industries, markets, and companies of significance to military and industrial advantage to identify supply chain vulnerabilities.
(a) Analyses required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Undersecretary for Acquisition and Sustainment and other appropriate officials, shall review the materials, processes, and technology sectors under subsection (c) to determine and develop appropriate actions, consistent with the policies, programs, and activities required under chapter 148 of title 10, United States Code, including—
(A) restricting procurement, with appropriate waivers for cost, emergency requirements, and non-availability of suppliers, including restricting procurement to—
(b) Recommendations.—The analyses conducted pursuant to subsection (a) shall be used to inform policy, agreements, guidance and reporting requirements under chapter 148 of title 10, United States Code, including—
(2) the annual report on unfunded priorities of the national technology and industrial base required under section 2504a of such title;
(3) Department of Defense technology and industrial base policy guidance prescribed under section 2506 of such title;
(4) activities to modernize acquisition processes to ensure integrity of industrial base pursuant to section 2509 of such title;
(c) Materials, technologies, and processes of interest.—The Secretary of Defense shall prioritize undertaking analyses and making recommendations under this section for the following goods and services:
(a) In general.—Not later than January 1, 2021, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary for Research and Engineering, and the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff a strategy to manufacture state-of-the art integrated circuits in the United States within a period of three to five years that includes a plan to explore and evaluate options for re-establishing microelectronics foundry services and the industrial capabilities associated with such services.
(b) Elements.—In developing the strategy required under subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall consider—
(2) processes and criteria for competitive selection of commercial companies, including companies headquartered in allied and partner countries, to provide design, foundry and assembly, and packaging services and to build and operate the industrial capabilities associated with such services;
(3) the role that the broader Federal Government should play in organizing and supporting the strategy, including any required direct or indirect funding support, or legislative and regulatory actions, including restricting procurements to domestic sources, and providing anti-trust and export control relief; and
(c) Submission of strategy to President.—Not later February 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit the strategy, together with any views and recommendations, and an estimated budget to implement the strategy, to the President, the National Security Council, and the National Economic Council.
(a) Purchases.—Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall require for new contracts or other acquisition activities that contractors, or subcontractors at any tier, that provide covered printed circuit boards for use by the Department of Defense certify that, of the total value of the covered printed circuit boards provided by the contractor or subcontractor pursuant to a contract or subcontract with the Department of Defense, not less than the percentages set forth in subsection (b) were manufactured and assembled within a covered nation.
(b) Implementation.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIRED PERCENTAGES.—In establishing the certification process under subsection (a), the Secretary shall establish and publish increasing percentages of values of the covered printed circuit boards under subsection (a) to be complied with by appropriate contractors and subcontractors, based on—
(B) assessment of threats to national security capabilities from use of printed circuit boards from non-covered nations;
(C) economic benefits accrued by non-covered nations which would otherwise be accrued by covered nations;
(2) MINIMUM PERCENTAGES.—The percentages established by the Secretary under this subsection shall, in any case, be equal to or greater than, unless specifically directed by the Secretary for an individual contract or subcontract—
(3) LIMITED EXCEPTIONS.—If the Secretary of Defense directs that a specific contract or subcontract is required to comply with a different percentage than those prescribed under this subsection, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days after such direction is issued, along with a rationale for the changed percentage.
(c) Remediation.—In the event that a contractor or subcontractor is unable to complete the certification required under subsection (a), the Secretary may accept covered printed circuit boards from the contractor or subcontractor for an appropriate time period, not to exceed 18 months over a five-year period, while requiring the contractor to complete a remediation plan. Such a plan shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees and shall require the contractor or subcontractor to—
(1) audit its supply chain to identify any areas of security vulnerability and compliance with section 224 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 119–92); and
(d) Waiver.—A contractor may request that the Secretary of Defense waive the requirement for certification, and the Secretary may grant such a waiver, if the Secretary has conclusively determined that—
(1) there are no significant national security concerns regarding counterfeiting, quality, or unauthorized access created by any covered printed circuit boards provided to the Department of Defense by the contractor in the fiscal year under the certification requirement or the previous fiscal year;
(e) Availability and cost exceptions.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to the extent that the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that covered printed circuit boards of satisfactory quality and sufficient quantity, in the required form, cannot be procured as and when needed from covered nations at reasonable cost, excluding comparisons with non-market economies, or in time to meet an operational requirement.
(f) Definitions.—In this section—
(1) the term “covered printed circuit board” means any printed circuit board that is a—
(2) the term “covered nation” means—
(B) a member nation of the national technology and industrial base under section 2500 of title 10, United States Code; or
(C) a nation that has agreed, in compliance with section 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776) and section 2457 of title 10, United States Code—
(g) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Department of Defense from entering into a contract with an entity that connects to the facilities of a third party, for the purposes of backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements, on the basis of the third party’s noncompliance with the provisions of this section.
(a) Statement of policy.—It is the policy of the United States that the Department of Defense shall pursue the following goals:
(1) Ensure, by 2030, secure sources of supply of strategic minerals and metals that will—
(2) Provide incentives for the defense industrial base to develop robust processing and manufacturing capabilities in the United States to refine strategic minerals and metals for Department of Defense purposes.
(3) Maintain secure sources of supply of strategic minerals and metals required to maintain current military requirements in the event that international supply chains are disrupted.
(4) Achieve the goals described in paragraphs (1) through (3) through, among other methods—
(A) the continued and expanded use of existing programs, such as the National Defense Stockpile administered by the Defense Logistics Agency; and
(B) the continued use of authorities under title III of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4531 et seq.).
(a) Report required.—Not later than June 30, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the results of a study, conducted for purposes of this section, concerning strategic and critical minerals and metals and vulnerabilities in supply chains of such minerals and metals.
(b) Strategic and critical minerals and metals.—For purposes of this section, strategic and critical minerals and metals are minerals and metals, including rare earth elements, that are necessary to meet national defense and national security requirements, including supply chain resiliency, and for the economic security of the United States.
(c) Elements.—The study required for purposes of the report under subsection (a) shall do the following:
(1) Identify the strategic and critical minerals and metals that are currently utilized by the Department of Defense.
(2) To the extent practicable, identify the overall annual tonnage of each strategic or critical mineral or metal identified pursuant to paragraph (1) that was utilized by the Department during the 10-year period ending on December 31, 2020.
(3) Identify domestic and international sources for the strategic and critical minerals and metals identified pursuant to paragraph (1).
(4) Identify risks to access to the strategic and critical minerals and metals identified pursuant to paragraph (1) from supply chain disruptions due to geopolitical, economic, and other vulnerabilities.
(5) Evaluate the benefits of a robust domestic supply chain for providing strategic and critical minerals and metals to Department manufacturing supply chains in real time.
(6) Evaluate the effects of the use of waivers by the Department of Defense Strategic Materials Protection Board on the domestic supply of strategic and critical minerals and metals.
(7) Recommend policies and procedures for the Department to ensure a capability to secure strategic and critical minerals and metals necessary for emerging technologies such as anti-microbial products, minerals, and metals for use in medical equipment among other technologies.
(8) Identify improvements required to the National Defense Stockpile in order to ensure the Department has access to the strategic and critical minerals and metals identified pursuant to paragraph (1).
(9) Evaluate the domestic processing and manufacturing capacity needed to supply the Department with the strategic and critical minerals and metals identified pursuant to paragraph (1) in an economic and secure manner.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the Department of the Navy must explore and identify solutions, in consultation with the Department of Labor, to enhance shipbuilding workforce stability and ensure industry preparedness to construct the 355-ship fleet.
(b) Working group to stabilize shipbuilding industrial base workforce.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy shall form a working group with the Secretary of Labor for the purpose of enhancing integration of programs, resources, and expertise to strengthen the shipbuilding industrial base, as well as to provide recommendations to Congress, to better stabilize the shipbuilding industrial base workforce and determine appropriate solutions for workforce fluctuations.
(2) DUTIES.—The working group shall carry out the following activities related to the ongoing challenges with workforce stability:
(A) Analyze existing Department of the Navy contracts with the shipbuilding industry and other relevant information to better anticipate future employment trends and tailor workforce resources and opportunities for workers most vulnerable to upcoming workforce fluctuations.
(B) Identify existing Department of Labor programs for unemployed, underemployed, and furloughed employees that could benefit the shipbuilding industrial base workforce during times of workload fluctuations and workforce instability, and explore potential partnerships to connect employees with appropriate resources.
(C) Explore possible cost sharing agreements to enable the Department of the Navy to contribute funding to existing Department of Labor workforce programs to support the shipbuilding workforce.
(D) Examine possible programs that will specifically assist furloughed employees who may sporadically rely on unemployment benefits.
(E) Explore opportunities for unemployed, underemployed, or furloughed employees to provide workforce training through temporary partnerships with States, technical schools, community colleges, and other local workforce development opportunities.
(F) Review existing training programs for the shipbuilding workforce to maximize relevant and necessary training opportunities that would broaden employee skillset during times of unemployment, underemployment, or furlough, where applicable.
(G) Assess the possibility of shipbuilding worker support programs to weather a period of unemployment, underemployment, or furlough, including compensation options, alternative employment, temporary stipends, or other worker support opportunities.
(H) Study cross-State credentialing requirements and identify any restrictions that inhibit the flexibility of the shipbuilding workforce to seek employment opportunities across State lines, and make recommendations to streamline licensing, credentialing, certification, and qualification requirements within the shipbuilding industry.
(I) Review additional or new contracting authorities that could enable the Department of the Navy to award short-term, flexible contracts that will prioritize work for unemployed, underemployed, or furloughed employees within the shipbuilding workforce.
(J) Identify specific workforce support programs to support suppliers of all sizes within the shipbuilding industrial base, and assess any additional support from prime contractors that would improve the stability of such suppliers.
(K) Assess whether greater collaboration with the United States Coast Guard and its shipbuilding contractors and subcontractors would improve workforce stability by assessing a totality of shipbuilding demands.
(L) Consider potential pilot programs that will specifically address shipbuilding industrial base workforce stability.
(M) Explore any additional opportunities to invest in recruiting, retaining, and training a skilled shipbuilding workforce.
(N) Consider and incorporate the findings and recommendations, as appropriate, of the report on shipbuilder training and the defense industrial base required under section 1037 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
(3) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT AND STRUCTURE.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy, in coordination with the Secretary of Labor, shall notify the congressional defense committees regarding the membership and structure of the working group.
(4) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, and the Committee on Education and Labor of the House of Representatives a report with the findings and recommendations of the working group.
Section 2534 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(3) in subsection (c)—
(a) In general.— Except as provided in subsection (a), any acquisition executive of the Department of Defense who approves a contract for a national security satellite after October 1, 2021, shall require any star tracker system included in the design of such national security satellite to be domestically sourced.
(b) Exceptions.— The application of subsection (a) may be waived if the acquisition executive certifies in writing that—
(1) there is no available domestically sourced star tracker system that meets the national security satellite systems mission and design requirements;
Subsection (h) of section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(h) Exception for small purchases.—Subsection (a) does not apply to purchases for amounts not greater than $150,000. A proposed purchase or contract for an amount greater than $150,000 may not be divided into several purchases or contracts for lesser amounts in order to qualify for this exception. On October 1 of each year evenly divisible by 5, the Secretary of Defense may adjust the dollar threshold in this subsection based on changes in the Consumer Price Index. The Secretary shall publish notice of any such adjustment in the Federal Register, and the new price threshold shall take effect on the date of publication.”.
(a) Service Acquisition Executives input.—The Service Acquisition Executives shall report to the Secretary of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense how they are assessing, mitigating, and reporting on the following risks in acquisition programs:
(2) Integration and interoperability risks, including complications related to systems working across multiple domains while using machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities to continuously change and optimize system performance.
(3) Operations and sustainment risks, including as mediated by access to technical data and intellectual property rights.
(4) Workforce and training risks, including consideration of the role of contractors as part of the total workforce.
(5) Supply chain risks, including cybersecurity, foreign control and ownership of key elements of supply chains, and the consequences a fragile and weakening defense industrial base, combined with barriers to industrial cooperation with allies and partners pose for delivering systems and technologies in a trusted and assured manner.
(a) In general.—Not later than March 15, 2021, the Comptroller General of the United States shall brief the congressional defense committees on the implementation by the Department of Defense of required acquisition reforms with respect to acquiring software for weapon systems, business systems, and other activities that are part of the defense acquisition system, with a report, or reports, to follow as agreed upon by the committees and the Comptroller General.
(b) Elements.—The briefing and report, or reports, required under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the extent to which the Department of Defense has implemented requirements related to the following:
(1) Software acquisition studies and their implementation, including pursuant to section 872 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; Defense Innovation Board analysis of software acquisition regulations), section 868 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; implementation of recommendations of the final report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Design and Acquisition of Software for Defense Systems).
(2) Software acquisition activities pursuant to section 2322a of title 10, United States Code (related to consideration of certain maters during the acquisition of noncommercial computer software), section 875 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; pilot program for open source software), and section 800 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92, related to continuous integration and delivery of software applications and upgrades to embedded systems).
(3) Software acquisition pilots, including the pilot program pursuant to section 873 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; relating to the use of agile or iterative development methods to tailor major software-intensive warfighting systems and defense business systems) and the pilot program pursuant to section 874 of such Act (relating to using agile best practices for software development).
(c) Assessment of acquisition policy, guidance, and practices.—Each report under subsection (a) should include an assessment of the extent to which Department of Defense software acquisition policy, guidance, and practices reflect implementation of relevant recommendations from related studies, pilot programs, and directives from the congressional defense committees.
(d) Modification of requirements for Comptroller General assessment of acquisition programs and initiatives.—Section 2229b(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “a summary of organizational and legislative changes and emerging assessment methodologies since the last assessment, and a discussion of the implications” and inserting “a discussion of selected organizational, policy, and legislative changes, as determined appropriate by the Comptroller General, and the potential implications”.
(a) Authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 140 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2380c. Authority to acquire innovative commercial products and services using general solicitation competitive procedures
“(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may acquire innovative commercial products and services through a competitive selection of proposals resulting from a general solicitation and the peer review of such proposals.
“(b) Treatment as competitive procedures.—Use of general solicitation competitive procedures under subsection (a) shall be considered to be use of competitive procedures for purposes of chapter 137 of this title.
“(c) Limitations.— (1) The Secretary may not enter into a contract or agreement in excess of $100,000,000 using the authority under subsection (a) without a written determination from the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment or the relevant service acquisition executive of the efficacy of the effort to meet mission needs of the Department of Defense or the relevant military department.
“(d) Congressional notification required.— (1) Not later than 45 days after the award of a contract for an amount exceeding $100,000,000 using the authority in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees of such award.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 140 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2380b the following new item:
“2380c. Authority to acquire innovative commercial products and services using general solicitation competitive procedures.”.
(b) Repeal of obsolete authority.—Section 879 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is hereby repealed.
Section 2306a(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking “contract if” and all that follows through clause (iii) and inserting “contract if the price adjustment is expected to exceed $2,000,000.”;
Section 819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3385; 10 U.S.C. 2305 note) is amended—
(a) In general.—Section 2302e of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 2302e and inserting the following new item:
“2302e. Contract authority for development and demonstration of initial or additional prototype units.”.
Section 893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1) by striking “significant deficiencies” both places it appears and inserting “material weaknesses”;
(2) by striking “significant deficiency” each place it appears and inserting “material weakness”; and
(3) by amending paragraph (4) of subsection (g) to read as follows:
“(4) The term ‘material weakness’ means a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over risks related to Government contract compliance or other shortcomings in the system, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material noncompliance will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A reasonable possibility exists when the likelihood of an event occurring is either reasonably possible, meaning the chance of the future event occurring is more than remote but less than likely, or is probable.”.
Section 827 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91) is repealed.
(a) Requirements for interface delivery.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Joint All Domain Command and Control Cross Functional Team under the supervision of the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer and the Joint Staff Director for Command, Control, Communications, and Computers/Cyber, shall prescribe regulations and issue guidance to the military services, defense agencies and field activities, and combatant commands, as appropriate, in order to—
(A) facilitate the Department of Defense’s access to and utilization of system, major subsystem, and major component software-defined interfaces;
(B) fully meet the intent of chapter 144B of title 10, United States Code; and
(2) ELEMENTS.—The regulations and guidance required in subsection (a)(1) shall include, at a minimum—
(A) requirements that each relevant program office characterizes the desired modularity of the system for which it is responsible, either, in the case of major defense acquisition programs, in the acquisition strategy required under section 2431a of title 10, United States Code, or, in the case of other programs, via other documentation, including—
(i) specification of which system, major subsystems, and major components should be able to execute without requiring coincident execution of other systems, major subsystems, and major components;
(B) requirements that relevant Department of Defense contracts include mandates for the delivery of system, major subsystem, and major component software-defined interfaces for systems, major subsystems, and major components deemed relevant in the acquisition strategy or documentation referred to in subsection (a)(2)(a), including—
(i) software-defined interface syntax and properties, specifically governing how values are validly passed and received between major subsystems and components, in machine-readable format;
(ii) a machine-readable definition of the relationship between the delivered interface and existing common standards or interfaces available in the interface repository of subsection (c), if appropriate and available, using interface field transform technology developed under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency System of Systems Technology Integration Tool Chain for Heterogeneous Electronic Systems (STITCHES) program or technology that is functionally similar; and
(C) requirements that relevant program offices, including those responsible for maintaining and upgrading legacy systems, that have awarded contracts that do not include the requirements specified in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) nevertheless acquire the items specified in clauses (i) through (iii) of such subparagraph, either through contractual updates, separate negotiations or contracts, or program management mechanisms; and
(3) APPLICABILITY OF REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE.—
(A) APPLICABILITY.—The regulations and guidance required under subsection (a)(1) shall apply, at a minimum, to program offices responsible for the prototyping, acquisition, or sustainment of new or existing cyber-physical weapon systems with software-defined interfaces, or with major subsystems or components with software-defined interfaces, developed or to be developed, wholly or in part with Federal funds, including those applicable program offices using other transaction authorities (OTA).
(B) EXTENSION OF SCOPE.—One year after the promulgation of the regulations and guidance required under subsection (a)(1) for cyber-physical systems, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall extend the regulations and guidance to apply to purely software systems, including business systems and cybersecurity systems. The Secretary may make the regulations and guidance applicable, as practicable, to program offices responsible for the acquisition of systems and capabilities under part 12 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and commercially available off the-the-shelf items.
(b) Rights in interface software.—
(1) REGULATIONS.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall prescribe regulations to define the legitimate interest of the United States and of a contractor or subcontractor in interface software. The regulations shall be included in regulations of the Department of Defense prescribed as part of the Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(2) LIMITATION ON REGULATIONS.—The regulations prescribed pursuant to paragraph (1) may not—
(3) ELEMENTS.—Such regulations shall include the following provisions:
(A) In the case of a software interface that is developed by a contractor or subcontractor exclusively with Federal funds (other than an item developed under a contract or subcontract to which regulations under section 9(j)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(j)(2)) apply), the United States shall have the unlimited and non-expiring right to use the software or release or disclose the software to persons outside the government or permit the use of the software by such persons.
(B) In the case of a software interface that is developed in part with Federal funds and in part at private expense and except in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that negotiation of different rights in such software would be in the best interest of the United States, the Government—
(i) shall have Government-purpose rights to the software interface, and, in addition, may release or disclose the software interface, or authorize others to do so, if—
(I) prior to release or disclosure, the intended recipient is subject to an exclusive for-Government-use and non-disclosure agreement;
(C) In the case of a software interface that is developed exclusively at private expense, the Government shall negotiate with the contractor or the subcontractor to best achieve, if practical, Government-purpose rights to the software interface and rights to release or disclose the software interface, or authorize others to do so, if—
(i) prior to release or disclosure, the intended recipient is subject to an exclusive for-Government use and non-disclosure agreement;
(c) Interface repository.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall establish and maintain, at the appropriate classification level, an interface repository for interfaces, syntax and properties, documentation, and communication implementations delivered pursuant to the requirements established under subsection (a)(2)(B) and shall provide interfaces, access to interfaces, and relevant documentation to the military services, defense agencies and field activities, combatant commands, and contractors, as appropriate, to facilitate system, major subsystem, and major component segregation and reintegration.
(2) DISTRIBUTION OF INTERFACES.—Consistent with section 2320 of title 10, United States Code, and in accordance with subsection (b), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment may distribute interfaces, access to interfaces, and relevant documentation to Government entities and contractors. Any such protected transfer or disclosure by the Government to a recipient is limited to only those data necessary for segregation, interoperability, integration, or reintegration.
(d) System of systems integration technology and experimentation.—
(1) DEMONSTRATIONS AND ASSESSMENT.—No later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Joint Staff Director for Command, Control, Communications, and Computers/Cyber and Department of Defense Chief Information Officer, through the Joint All Domain Command and Control Cross Functional Team, shall conduct demonstrations and complete an assessment of the technologies developed under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s System of Systems Integration Technology and Experimentation program, including the STITCHES technology, and their applicability to the Joint All-Domain Command and Control architecture. The demonstrations and assessment shall include—
(A) at least three demonstrations of the use of the STITCHES technology to create, under constrained schedules and budgets, novel kill chains involving previously incompatible weapon systems, sensors, and command, control, and communication systems from multiple military services in cooperation with United States Indo-Pacific Command or United States European Command;
(B) an evaluation as to whether the communications enabled via the STITCHES technology are sufficient for military missions and whether the technology results in any substantial performance loss in communication between systems, major subsystems, and major components;
(C) an evaluation as to whether the STITCHES technology obviates the need to develop, impose, and maintain strict adherence to common communication and interface standards for Department of Defense systems;
(D) the appropriate roles and responsibilities of the Department of Defense Chief Information Officer, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the geographic combatant commands, the military services, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the defense industrial base in using and maintaining the STITCHES technology to generate diverse and recomposable kill chains as part of the Joint All-Domain Command and Control architecture; and
(2) CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ASSESSMENT.—The Department of Defense Chief Information Officer shall assess the technologies developed under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s System of Systems Integration Technology and Experimentation program, including the STITCHES interface field transform technology, and their applicability to the Department’s business systems and cybersecurity tools. This assessment shall include—
(A) at least two demonstrations of the use of the STITCHES technology in enabling communication between business systems;
(B) in coordination with the Cross Functional Team under the Principal Cyber Adviser and the Integrated Adaptive Cyber Defense program office of the National Security Agency, at least two demonstrations of the use of the STITCHES technology in enabling communication between and orchestration of previously incompatible cybersecurity tools; and
(3) SUSTAINMENT OF STITCHES ENGINEERING RESOURCES AND CAPABILITIES DEVELOPED BY DARPA.—To conduct the demonstrations and assessments required under this subsection and to execute the Joint All Domain Command and Control program, the Joint All Domain Command and Control program office shall sustain the STITCHES engineering resources and capabilities developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
(e) Transfer of responsibility for STITCHES.—One year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may transfer responsibility for maintaining the STITCHES engineering capabilities to a different organization.
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) DESIRED MODULARITY.—The term “desired modularity” means the desired degree to which systems, major constitutive subsystems and components within a system, and major subsystems and components across subsystems can function as modules that can communicate across component boundaries and through interfaces and can be separated and recombined to achieve various effects, missions, or capabilities.
(a) Annual sustainment reviews.—Section 2441(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “annually thereafter” before “throughout the life cycle of the weapon system”.
(b) Submission to Congress of sustainment reviews.—Section 2441 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) Submission to Congress of sustainment reviews.— (1) The Secretary of each military department shall submit no fewer than ten sustainment reviews required by this section to the congressional defense committees annually. The Secretary of each military department shall select the ten reviews from among the systems with the highest independent cost estimates for the remainder of the life cycle of the program.
“(2) The Secretary shall submit the reviews required under paragraph (1) to the congressional defense committees annually not later than 30 days after submission of the President’s annual budget request to Congress under section 1105 of title 31. The sustainment reviews shall be posted on a publicly available website maintained by the Director of the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office and, for those systems with operating and support cost growth, shall include comments from the military departments regarding actions being taken to reduce the operating and support costs. The reviews may include classified appendices, as appropriate.”.
(c) Comptroller General study.—Not later than 180 days after the Secretaries of the military departments post the initial sustainment reviews required under paragraph (1) of subsection (d) of section 2441 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (b) of this section) on a publicly available website as required under paragraph (2) of such subsection (d), the Comptroller General of the United States shall assess steps the military departments are taking to quantify and address operating and support cost growth. The assessment shall include—
(1) an evaluation of—
(A) the causes of operating and support cost growth for selected systems covered by the sustainment reviews, as well as any other systems the Comptroller General determines appropriate;
The Secretary of each military department shall provide to the congressional defense committees in the future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, for fiscal year 2022 a list of at least one acquisition program for which it would be appropriate to have a large number of users provide direct assessment of the outcome of a competitive contract award.
(a) In general.—Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2339c. Disclosures for certain shipbuilding major defense acquisition program offers
“(a) General.—Any covered offeror seeking to be awarded a shipbuilding construction contract as part of a major defense acquisition program with funds from the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy account shall disclose with its offer and any subsequent offer revisions, including the final proposal revision offer, whether any part of the offeror’s planned contract performance will or is expected to include foreign government subsidized performance, financing, financial guarantees, or tax concessions.
“(b) Disclosure.—An offeror shall make a disclosure required under subsection (a) in a format prescribed by the Secretary of the Navy and shall include therein a specific description of the extent to which the offeror’s planned contract performance will include, with or without contingencies, any foreign government subsidized performance, financing, financial guarantees, or tax concessions.
“(c) Congressional notification.—Not later than 5 days after awarding a contract described under subsection (a) to an offeror that made a disclosure under subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy shall notify the congressional defense committees and summarize such disclosure.
“(d) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) COVERED OFFEROR.—The term ‘covered offeror’ means any offeror that currently requires or may reasonably be expected to require during the period of contract performance a method to mitigate or negate foreign ownership under subsection (f)(6) of part 2004.34 of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations.
“(2) FOREIGN GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED PERFORMANCE.—The term ‘foreign government subsidized performance’ means any financial support, materiel, services, or guarantees of support, services, supply, performance, or intellectual property concessions, that may be provided to or for the offeror or the offeror’s Department of Defense customer by a foreign government or entity effectively owned or controlled by a foreign government, which may have the effect of supplementing, supplying, servicing, or reducing the cost or price of an end item, or supporting, financing in whole or in part, or guaranteeing contract performance by the offeror.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2339b the following new item:
“2339c. Disclosures for certain shipbuilding major defense acquisition program offers.”.
Section 2307(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 873(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2306a) is amended by striking “2020” and inserting “2023”.
Section 9(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(b)) is amended—
(4) by adding at the end the following:
“(11) with respect to a Federal agency to which subsection (f)(1) or (n)(1) applies and that the Administration determines has not satisfied the requirement under either applicable subsection, require the head of that Federal agency to submit to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives a report regarding why the Federal agency has not satisfied the requirement.”.
(a) Requirements for solicitations of commercial and developmental solutions.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall develop requirements for inclusion in solicitations for both commercial and developmental solutions, and for the evaluation of bids, of appropriate software security criteria, including—
(b) Security review of code.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall develop processes for security review of code for the purpose of publication and other procedures necessary to fully implement the pilot program required under section 875 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2223 note).
(c) Coordination with Software Acquisition Pathway efforts.—The requirements and procedures required under subsections (a) and (b) shall be developed in conjunction with the Department of Defense's efforts to incorporate input and finalize the procedures described in the Interim Procedures for Operation of the Software Acquisition Pathway.
(a) In general.—Not later than October 1, 2021, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating the implementation of the Department of Defense's Instruction on Intellectual Property Acquisition and Licensing (DODI 5010.44), established under section 2322 of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall assess the following:
(1) The extent to which the Department of Defense is fulfilling the core principles established in DODI 5010.44.
(2) The extent to which the Defense Acquisition University, Department of Defense components, and program offices are carrying out their responsibilities under DODI 5010.44.
(3) The progress of the Department in establishing an IP Cadre, including the extent to which such experts are executing their roles and responsibilities.
(a) Finding.—In its final report, the Section 809 Panel recommended the adoption of consumption-based approaches at the Department of Defense, stating, “More things will be sold as a service in the future. XaaS could really mean everything in the context of the Internet of things (IoT). Consumption-based solutions are appearing in many industry sectors, from last mile transportation (e.g., bike shares and electric scooters) to agriculture (e.g., tractor-as-a-service for farmers in developing countries). Most smart phone users are familiar with software updates that provide bug fixes or new features. A more extreme example of technology innovation enabled by the IoT is the ability to deliver physical performance improvements to vehicles through over-the-air software updates… In the not-so-distant future, cloud computing and the IoT will enable consumption-based solution offerings and delivery models that are hard to imagine today.”
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress—
(1) that the Department of Defense should take advantage of “as-a-service” or “aaS” approaches in commercial capability development, particularly where the capability is software-defined, and cloud-enabled;
(2) to support the Department of Defense’s commitment to new approaches to development and acquisition of software;
(c) In general.—Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to establish a pilot program to explore the use of consumption-based solutions to address software-intensive warfighting capability.
(d) Selection of initiatives.—The Secretary of each military department and the commander of each combatant command with acquisition authority shall propose for selection by the Secretary of Defense for the pilot program at least one and not more than three initiatives that are well-suited to explore consumption-based solutions to address software-intensive warfighting capability. The initiatives may be new or existing programs of record and shall focus on software-defined or machine-enabled warfighting applications, and may include applications that—
(e) Contract requirements.—Contracts for consumption-based solutions entered into pursuant to the pilot program shall provide for—
(f) Duration of initiatives.—Each initiative carried out under the pilot program shall be carried out during the three-year period following selection of the initiative.
(g) Monitoring and evaluation of pilot program.—The Director of the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall establish continuous monitoring to evaluate the pilot program established under subsection (c), including collecting data on cost, schedule, and performance from the program office, the user community, and the contractors.
(h) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on initiatives selected for the pilot program, roles and responsibilities for implementing the pilot program, and the monitoring and evaluation approach for the pilot.
(2) PROGRESS REPORT.—Not later than April 15, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the initiatives.
(3) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the cost, schedule, and performance outcomes of the initiatives. The report shall also include lessons learned about the use of consumption-based solutions for software-intensive capabilities and any recommendations for statutory or regulatory changes to facilitate their use.
(i) Consumption-based solution defined.—In this section, the term “consumption-based solution” means any combination of software, hardware or equipment, and labor or services that provides a seamless capability that is metered and billed based on actual usage and predetermined pricing per resource unit, and includes the ability to rapidly scale capacity up or down.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish, enforce, and track actions being taken to protect defense-sensitive United States intellectual property, technology, and other data and information, including hardware and software, from acquisition by the Government of the People's Republic of China.
(b) List of critical technology.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a list of critical national security technology.
(c) Restrictions on employment of defense industrial base employees with Chinese companies.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for mechanisms to restrict employees or former employees of the defense industrial base that contribute to the technology referenced in subsection (b) from working directly for companies wholly owned by, or under the direction of, the Government of the Peoples Republic of China.
(d) Reports.—
(1) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORT.—Not later than May 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on progress in implementing the measures described in subsections (a) through (c).
(2) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.— Not later than December 1, 2021, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report reviewing the report submitted under paragraph (1) and providing an assessment of the effectiveness of the measures implemented under this section.
Section 2350a(g)(1)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “and conventional defense equipment, munitions, and technologies manufactured and developed domestically” after “in subsection (a)(2)”.
(a) In general.—Section 2870 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 865 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is repealed.
(b) Conforming amendments.—
(1) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 2870.
(2) OBSOLETE PROVISION.—Section 865 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is repealed.
(a) In general.—
(1) CLARIFICATION OF CHAIN OF ADMINISTRATIVE COMMAND.—Section 138(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of subparagraph (B) as subclauses (I), (II), and (III), respectively;
(D) in clause (i) of subparagraph (A), as redesignated by this paragraph, by inserting before the period at the end the following: “through the administrative chain of command specified in section 167(f) of this title;” and
(E) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(B) In the discharge of the responsibilities specified in subparagraph (A)(i), the Assistant Secretary is immediately subordinate to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense. No officer below the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may intervene to exercise authority, direction, or control over the Assistant Secretary in the discharge of such responsibilities.”.
(b) Fulfillment of special operations responsibilities.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 139b of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 139b. Secretariat for Special Operations; Special Operations Policy and Oversight Council
“(a) Secretariat for Special Operations.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—In order to fulfill the responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict specified in section 138(b)(2)(A)(i) of this title, there shall be within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict an office to be known as the ‘Secretariat for Special Operations’.
“(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Secretariat is to assist the Assistant Secretary in exercising authority, direction, and control with respect to the special operations-peculiar administration and support of the special operations command, including the readiness and organization of special operations forces, resources and equipment, and civilian personnel as specified in such section.
“(3) DIRECTOR.—The Director of the Secretariat for Special Operations shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense from among individuals qualified to serve as the Director. The Director shall have a grade of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense.
“(4) ADMINISTRATIVE CHAIN OF COMMAND.—For purposes of the support of the Secretariat for the Assistant Secretary in the fulfillment of the responsibilities referred to in paragraph (1), the administrative chain of command is as specified in section 167(f) of this title. No officer below the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense (other than the Assistant Secretary) may intervene to exercise authority, direction, or control over the Secretariat in its support of the Assistant Secretary in the discharge of such responsibilities.
“(b) Special Operations Policy and Oversight Council.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—In order to fulfill the responsibilities specified in section 138(b)(2)(A)(i) of this title, there shall also be within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict a team known as the ‘Special Operation Policy and Oversight Council’. The team is lead by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, or the Assistant Secretary's designee..
“(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Council is to integrate the functional activities of the headquarters of the Department of Defense in order to most efficiently and effectively provide for special operations forces and capabilities. In fulfilling this purpose, the Council shall develop and continuously improve policy, joint processes, and procedures that facilitate the development, acquisition, integration, employment, and sustainment of special operations forces and capabilities.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 139b and inserting the following new item:
“139b. Secretariat for Special Operations; Special Operations Policy and Oversight Council.”.
(c) DoD directive on responsibilities of ASD SOLIC.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall publish a Department of Defense directive establishing policy and procedures related to the exercise of authority, direction, and control of all special-operations peculiar administrative matters relating to the organization, training, and equipping of special operations forces by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict as specified by section 138(b)(2)(A)(i) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a)(1).
(2) MATTERS FOR INCLUDING.—The directive required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A specification of responsibilities for coordination on matters affecting the organization, training, and equipping of special operations forces.
(B) An identification and specification of updates to applicable documents and instructions of the Department of Defense.
(3) APPLICABILITY.— The directive required by paragraph (1) shall apply throughout the Department of Defense to all components of the Department of Defense.
(4) LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN FUNDING PENDING PUBLICATION.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Secretary publishes the directive required by paragraph (1).
(a) Redesignation.—
(b) Codification in law.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 146. Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation
“(a) In general.—There is an Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation in the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment.
“(b) Director.—The Office shall be headed by the Director of the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, who shall be assigned to such position by the Under Secretary from among civilian employees of the Department of Defense who are qualified to serve in the position.
“(c) Functions.—Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary, the Office shall—
“(1) in cooperation with the other components, of the Department of Defense be the primary office within the Department for the provision of assistance to States, counties, municipalities, regions, and communities intended to—
“(A) foster greater cooperation with military installations in order to enhance the military mission, achieve facility and infrastructure savings and reduced operating costs, address encroachment and compatible land use issues, support military families, and increase military, civilian, and industrial readiness and resiliency; and
“(d) Annual report to Congress.—Not later than June 1 each year, the Director of the Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities of the Office during the preceding year, including the assistance provided pursuant to subsection (c)(1) during such year.”.
(a) Analysis required.—The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs shall conduct an analysis of the process used by the Department of Defense to identify reports to Congress required by annual national defense authorization Acts, assign responsibility for preparation of such reports, and manage the completion and delivery of such reports to Congress for the purpose of identifying mechanisms to optimize and otherwise modernize the process.
(b) Consultation.—The Assistant Secretary shall conduct the analysis required by subsection (a) with the assistance of and in consultation with the Chief Data Officer of the Department of Defense and the Director of the Defense Digital Service.
(c) Elements.—The analysis required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(d) Briefing.—Not later than November 15, 2020, the Assistant Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees on the results of the analysis required by subsection (a). The briefing shall address the following:
(1) The results of the analysis and of the business process reengineering described in subsection (c)(1).
(2) A description of the actions being taken, and to be taken, to optimize and otherwise improve the process described in subsection (a).
Section 181(d)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
The Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs shall assign responsibility for the Arctic region to the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Western Hemisphere or any other Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.
(a) Termination.—
(a) Report.—Not later than 45 days before the effective date specified pursuant to section 911(a)(1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the following:
(1) The position and title of each officer or employee of the Department of Defense, and the component of such officer or employee, in whom the Secretary will vest responsibility and authority to perform responsibilities and duties, and exercise authorities, assigned to the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, whether by statute or by directive, instruction, policy, or practice of the Department of Defense, on the termination of the position of Chief Management Officer under section 911.
(2) A description of the responsibilities, duties, and authorities, if any, assigned to the Chief Management Officer by statute that the Secretary recommends for discontinuation or modification, and a justification for such recommendation.
(3) A description of the responsibilities, duties, and authorities, if any, assigned to the Chief Management Officer by directive, instruction, policy, or practice of the Department that the Secretary recommends for discontinuation or modification, and a justification for such recommendation.
(4) A description of the general process and timeline for the effective transfer of each responsibility, duty, and authority assigned to the Chief Management Officer by statute or by policy, instruction, or practice of the Department to the officer or employee in whom such responsibility, duty, and authority will be vested as described in paragraph (1).
(5) A description of the manner and timeline in which the resources of the Chief Management Officer, including funding and human capital, will be realigned or repurposed to other organizations in the Office of the Secretary of Defense or to other components of the Department.
(6) A description of the general process and timeline for the assignment of responsibility of each issue under the jurisdiction of the Chief Management Officer current identified by the Comptroller General of the United States as “high risk” to an officer or employee in the Department who is specifically charged by the Secretary to initiate and sustain progress toward resolution of such issue.
(7) Such recommendations (including recommendations for legislative action) as the Secretary considers appropriate for additional authorities and resources (including funding and human capital resources) necessary to ensure that each officer or employee, in whom the Secretary vests responsibility and authority as described in paragraph (1) is capable of exercising such responsibility and authority effectively.
(b) Vesting of certain responsibilities, duties, and authorities in particular officers.—In setting forth matters under paragraph (1) of subsection (a), the report required by that subsection shall address, in particular, the following:
(1) Vesting of responsibilities, duties, and authorities of the Chief Management Officer in the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary's capacity as the Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense for purposes of functions specified in section 1123 of title 31, United States Code.
(2) Vesting of responsibilities, duties, and authorities of the Chief Management Officer in the Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense under section 142a of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 913 of this Act), for purposes of functions specified in section 1124 of title 31, United States Code.
(c) Other responsibilities, duties and authorities.—In addition to any other responsibilities, duties, and authorities of the Chief Management Officer, the report required by subsection (a) shall specifically address responsibilities, duties, and authorities of the Chief Management Officer with respect to the following:
(1) Establishment of policies for, and the direction and management of, enterprise business operations and shared business services of the Department, as set forth in section 132a(b) of title 10, United States Code, and section 921(b) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (10 U.S.C. 2222 note).
(2) Exercise of authority, direction, and control over the Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities for shared business services and budget review, assessment, certification, and reporting, as set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 132a of title 10, United States Code, and section 192 of that title.
(3) Minimization of duplication of efforts, maximization of efficiency and effectiveness, and establishment of metrics for performance among and for all components of the Department, as set forth in section 132a(b) of title 10, United States Code.
(4) Issuance and maintenance of guidance on covered defense business systems, development and maintenance of the defense business enterprise architecture, exercise of authorities and responsibilities with respect to common enterprise data, leadership of and matters within the Defense Business Council, and service as the appropriate approval official in the case of certain covered defense business systems and programs, as set forth in section 2222 of title 10, United States Code.
(5) The Financial Improvement and Audit Remediation Plan, as set forth in section 240b of title 10, United States Code.
(7) Discharge by the Department of the annual reviews required by section 11319 of title 40, United States Code.
(8) Business transformation efforts of the defense commissary system and the exchange stores system, as set forth in section 631 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
(9) Analysis of Department business management and operations datasets, as set forth in section 922 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (10 U.S.C. 2222 note).
(10) Reviews, reports, and other actions required by sections 924, 925, 926, 927, and 1624 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, to the extent such reviews, reports, and actions have not been completed as of the date of the report under subsection (a).
(11) Science and technology activities in support of business systems information technology acquisition as set forth in section 217 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 2445a note).
(12) Relationships with the Chief Management Officers of the military departments, and the development and update of a strategic management plan for the Department, as set forth in section 904 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) and the amendments made by that section.
(a) Performance Improvement Officer.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 142 the following new section:
Ҥ 142a. Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense
“(a) There is an Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense, who is designated as provided in section 1124(a)(1) of title 31.
“(b) The Performance Improvement Officer shall—
“(c) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the Performance Improvement Officer reports, without intervening authority, directly to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, in the Deputy Secretary's role as the Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense under section 1123 of title 31.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of section at the beginning of chapter 4 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 142 the following new item:
“142a. Performance Improvement Officer of the Department of Defense.”.
(b) Effective date.—
(a) Certain responsibilities and duties of Deputy Secretary of Defense.—
(1) CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—Section 132 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as subsections (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and
(2) DESIGNATION OF PRIORITY DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS.—Section 2222(h)(5)(B) of such title is amended by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “the Deputy Secretary of Defense, or such other officer of the Department of Defense as the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary may designate,”.
(b) Periodic reviews of Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities in connection with business enterprise reform.—Section 192(c) of such title is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraph (3), as redesignated by section 923(a)(1) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1930), as paragraph (4);
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2), as added by section 923(a)(2) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively;
(3) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this subsection—
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “the Secretary, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, or an officer of the Department of Defense designated by the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary”;
(c) Responsibility of Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) for Financial Improvement and Audit Remediation Plan.—Subsection (a) of section 240b of such title is amended to read as follows:
“(a) In general.—The Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall, together with such other officers and employees of the Department of Defense as the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense may designate, shall maintain a plan to be known as the ‘Financial Improvement and Audit Remediation Plan’.”.
(a) Title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) In section 240d(d)(1)(A), by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “any other officer or employee of the Department of Defense that the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense may designate for purposes of this section”.
(2) Section 2222 is amended—
(B) in subsection (e)—
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “such officers or employees of the Department of Defense as the Secretary shall designate”;
(C) in subsection (f)(1), by striking “the Chief Management Office and the Chief Information Office of the Department of Defense” and inserting “the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense and such other officers or employees of the Department of Defense as the Secretary may designate”; and
(b) Title 40, United States Code.—Section 11319(d)(4) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense (of any successor to such Officer)” and inserting “the officer of the Department of Defense designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense for such purpose”.
(c) Public Law 116–92.—Section 631(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “such officer of the Department of Defense as the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense may designate”.
(d) Public Law 115–232.—The John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) is amended as follows:
(1) In section 921(b)(1) (10 U.S.C. 2222 note)—
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “such officer or employee of the Department of Defense as the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall designate”;
(2) In section 922 (10 U.S.C. 2222 note)—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking “The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “An officer or employee of the Department of Defense designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense”; and
(3) In section 924 (10 U.S.C. 191 note)—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “such officer of the Department of Defense as the Secretary or Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall designate”;
(4) In section 925(a) (132 Stat. 1932), by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “such officer of the Department of Defense as the Secretary or Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall designate”.
(5) In section 926(a) (132 Stat. 1932), by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “such officer of the Department of Defense as the Secretary or Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall designate”.
(6) In section 927 (132 Stat. 1933)—
(7) In section 1624(a) (10 U.S.C. 2222 note)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “such officer of the Department of Defense as the Secretary or Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall designate”;
(e) Public Law 114–92.—The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92) is amended as follows:
(1) In section 217—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking “the Deputy Chief Management Officer, and the Chief Information Officer” and inserting “the Chief Information Officer, and any other officer of the Department of Defense designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense for such purpose”; and
(2) In section 881(a) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note), by striking “the Deputy Chief Management Officer,”.
(f) Public Law 110–81.—Section 904 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–81; 122 Stat. 273)) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(4), by striking “the Chief Management Officer and Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” and inserting “such officer of the Department of Defense as the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense shall designate”; and
Effective on the effective date specified in section 911(a)(1) of this Act, section 101(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(9) ENTERPRISE BUSINESS OPERATIONS.—The term ‘enterprise business operations’—
“(A) means activities that constitute cross-cutting business operations used by multiple components of the Department of Defense, but excludes activities that are directly tied to a single military department or Department of Defense component; and
“(B) includes business-support functions designated by the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense, including aspects of financial management, healthcare, acquisition and procurement, supply chain and logistics, certain information technology, real property, and human resources operations.”.
(a) Annual report required.—Not later than March 31 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report that includes the following:
(1) Each proposed budget for the enterprise business operations of a Defense Agency or Department of Defense Field Activity for the fiscal year beginning in the year in which such report is submitted.
(2) An identification of each proposed budget described in paragraph (1) that does not achieve required levels of efficiency and effectiveness for enterprise business operations.
(3) A discussion of the actions that the Secretary proposes to take, including recommendations for legislative action that the Secretary considers appropriate, to address inadequate levels of efficiency and effectiveness for enterprise business operations achieved by the proposed budgets described in paragraph (1).
(a) Title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) In section 131(b)—
(2) In section 133a(c)—
(a) Composition of Space Force.—Section 9081 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsection (b):
“(b) Composition.—The Space Force consists of—
(b) Functions.—Section 9081 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(c) Clarification of Chief of Space Operations authorities.—Section 9082 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “general officers of the Air Force” and inserting “general, flag, or equivalent officers of the Space Force”; and
(2) in subsection (b), by striking “grade of general” and inserting “grade in the Space Force equivalent to the grade of general in the Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps, or admiral in the Navy”; and
(d) Repeal of officer career field for space.—Section 9083 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(e) Regular Space Force.—Chapter 908 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (d), is further amended by adding at the end the following new section 9083:
(f) Table of sections.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 908 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 9083 and inserting the following new item:
(a) In general.—Chapter 908 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 931(e) of this Act, is further amended—
(2) by inserting after section 9082 the following new sections:
Ҥ 9083. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: function; composition
“(a) Function.—There is in the executive part of the Department of the Air Force an Office of the Chief of Space Operations to assist the Secretary of the Air Force in carrying out the responsibilities of the Secretary.
“(b) Composition.—The Office of the Chief of Space Operations is composed of the following:
“(2) Such other offices and officials as may be established by law or as the Secretary of the Air Force may establish or designate.
“(c) Organization.—Except as otherwise specifically prescribed by law, the Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall be organized in such manner, and the members of the Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall perform such duties and have such titles, as the Secretary of the Air Force may prescribe.
Ҥ 9084. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: general duties
“(a) Professional assistance.—The Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall furnish professional assistance to the Secretary of the Air Force, the Chief of Space Operations, and other personnel of the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force or the Office of the Chief of Space Operations.
“(b) Authorities.—Under the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Office of the Chief of Space Operations shall—
“(1) subject to subsections (c) and (d) of section 9014 of this title, prepare for such employment of the Space Force, and for such recruiting, organizing, supplying, equipping (including research and development), training, servicing, mobilizing, demobilizing, administering, and maintaining of the Space Force, as will assist in the execution of any power, duty, or function of the Secretary of the Air Force or the Chief of Space Operations;
“(2) investigate and report upon the efficiency of the Space Force and its preparation to support military operations by commanders of the combatant commands;
“(3) prepare detailed instructions for the execution of approved plans and supervise the execution of those plans and instructions;
(b) Table of sections.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 908 of such title, as amended by section 931(f) of this Act, is further amended by striking the item related to section 9083 and inserting the following the following new items:
“9083. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: function; composition.
“9084. Office of the Chief of Space Operations: general duties.
“9085. Regular Space Force: composition.”.
(a) Subtitle.—
(b) Organization.—
(1) SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE.—Section 9013 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE.—Section 9014 of such title is amended—
(B) in subsection (c)—
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking “and the Air Staff” and inserting “, the Air Staff, and the Office of the Chief of Space Operations”;
(ii) in paragraph (2), by inserting “or the Office of the Chief of Space Operations” after “the Air Staff”;
(iii) in paragraph (3), by striking “to the Chief of Staff and to the Air Staff” and all that follows through the end and inserting “to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and the Air Staff, and to the Chief of Space Operations and the Office of the Chief of Space Operations, and shall ensure that each such office or entity provides the Chief of Staff and Chief of Space Operations such staff support as the Chief concerned considers necessary to perform the Chief’s duties and responsibilities.”; and
(C) in subsection (d)—
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking “and the Air Staff” and inserting “, the Air Staff, and the Office of the Chief of Space Operations”;
(ii) in paragraph (2), by inserting “and the Office of the Chief of Space Operations” after “the Air Staff”; and
(iii) in paragraph (4), by striking “to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and to the Air Staff” and all that follows through the end and inserting “to the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and the Air Staff, and to the Chief of Space Operations and the Office of the Chief of Space Operations, and shall ensure that each such office or entity provides the Chief of Staff and Chief of Space Operations such staff support as the Chief concerned considers necessary to perform the Chief’s duties and responsibilities.”; and
(3) SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE: SUCCESSORS TO DUTIES.—Section 9017(4) of such title is amended by inserting before the period the following: “of the Air Force and the Chief of Space Operations, in the order prescribed by the Secretary of the Air Force and approved by the Secretary of Defense”.
(4) INSPECTOR GENERAL.—Section 9020 of such title is amended—
(5) THE AIR STAFF: FUNCTION; COMPOSITION.—Section 9031(b)(8) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “of the Air Force”.
(6) SURGEON GENERAL: APPOINTMENT; DUTIES.—Section 9036(b) of such title is amended—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force on all health and medical matters of the Air Force” and inserting “Secretary of the Air Force, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Chief of Space Operations on all health and medical matters of the Air Force and the Space Force”; and
(7) JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL, DEPUTY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL: APPOINTMENT; DUTIES.—Section 9037 of such title is amended—
(8) CHIEF OF CHAPLAINS: APPOINTMENT; DUTIES.—Section 9039(a) of such title is amended by striking “in the Air Force” and inserting “for the Air Force and the Space Force”.
(c) Personnel.—
(1) GENDER-FREE BASIS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF ORIGINAL ENLISTMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 9132 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or the Regular Space Force” after “Regular Air Force”.
(2) REENLISTMENT AFTER SERVICE AS AN OFFICER.—
(C) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 913 of such title, as amended by paragraph (1)(C), is further by striking the item relating to section 9138 and inserting the following new item:
“9138. Regular Air Force and Regular Space Force: reenlistment after service as an officer.”.
(3) APPOINTMENTS IN THE REGULAR AIR FORCE AND REGULAR SPACE FORCE.—
(C) TABLES OF CHAPTERS.—The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle D of such title, and at the beginning of part II of subtitle D of such title, are each amended by striking the item relating to chapter 915 and inserting the following new item:
- “915. Appointments in the Regular Air Force and the Regular Space Force 9151”.
(4) RETIRED COMMISSIONED OFFICERS: STATUS.—Section 9203 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “the Air Force”.
(5) DUTIES: CHAPLAINS; ASSISTANCE REQUIRED OF COMMANDING OFFICERS.—Section 9217(a) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “the Air Force”.
(6) RANK: COMMISSIONED OFFICERS SERVING UNDER TEMPORARY APPOINTMENTS.—Section 9222 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “the Air Force” both places it appears.
(7) REQUIREMENT OF EXEMPLARY CONDUCT.—Section 9233 of such title is amended—
(8) ENLISTED MEMBERS: OFFICERS NOT TO USE AS SERVANTS.—Section 9239 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “Air Force” both places it appears.
(9) PRESENTATION OF UNITED STATES FLAG UPON RETIREMENT.—Section 9251(a) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “member of the Air Force”.
(10) SERVICE CREDIT: REGULAR ENLISTED MEMBERS; SERVICE AS AN OFFICER TO BE COUNTED AS ENLISTED SERVICE.—Section 9252 of such title is amended—
(11) WHEN SECRETARY MAY REQUIRE HOSPITALIZATION.—Section 9263 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “member of the Air Force”.
(12) DECORATIONS AND AWARDS.—
(13) TWENTY YEARS OR MORE: REGULAR OR RESERVE COMMISSIONED OFFICERS.—Section 9311(a) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “officer of the Air Force”.
(14) TWENTY TO THIRTY YEARS: ENLISTED MEMBERS.—Section 9314 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “member of the Air Force”.
(15) THIRTY YEARS OR MORE: REGULAR ENLISTED MEMBERS.—Section 9317 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “Air Force”.
(16) THIRTY YEARS OR MORE: REGULAR COMMISSIONED OFFICERS.—Section 9318 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “Air Force”.
(17) FORTY YEARS OR MORE: AIR FORCE OFFICERS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 9324 of such title is amended in subsections (a) and (b) by inserting “or the Space Force” after “Air Force”.
(18) COMPUTATION OF YEARS OF SERVICE: VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT; ENLISTED MEMBERS.—Section 9325(a) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “Air Force”.
(19) COMPUTATION OF YEARS OF SERVICE: VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT; REGULAR AND RESERVE COMMISSIONED OFFICERS.—
(20) COMPUTATION OF RETIRED PAY: LAW APPLICABLE.—Section 9329 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “Air Force”.
(21) RETIRED GRADE.—
(A) HIGHER GRADE AFTER 30 YEARS OF SERVICE: WARRANT OFFICERS AND ENLISTED MEMBERS.—Section 9344 of such title is amended—
(B) RESTORATION TO FORMER GRADE: RETIRED WARRANT OFFICERS AND ENLISTED MEMBERS.—Section 9345 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “member of the Air Force”.
(C) RETIRED LISTS.—Section 9346 of such title is amended—
(i) in subsections (a) and (d), by inserting “or the Regular Space Force” after “Regular Air Force”;
(d) Training.—
(1) MEMBERS OF AIR FORCE: DETAIL AS STUDENTS, OBSERVERS, AND INVESTIGATORS AT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, INDUSTRIAL PLANTS, AND HOSPITALS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 9401 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(i) in subsection (a), by inserting “and members of the Space Force” after “members of the Air Force”;
(D) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 951 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9401 and inserting the following new item:
“9401. Members of Air Force and Space Force: detail as students, observers, and investigators at educational institutions, industrial plants, and hospitals.”.
(2) ENLISTED MEMBERS OF AIR FORCE: SCHOOLS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 9402 of such title is amended—
(3) SERVICE SCHOOLS: LEAVES OF ABSENCE FOR INSTRUCTORS.—Section 9406 of such title is amended by inserting “or Space Force” after “Air Force”.
(4) DEGREE GRANTING AUTHORITY FOR UNITED STATES AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.—Section 9414(d)(1) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “needs of the Air Force”.
(5) UNITED STATES AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: ADMINISTRATION.—Section 9414b(a)(2) is amended—
(6) COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF THE AIR FORCE: ASSOCIATE DEGREES.—Section 9415 of such title is amended—
(A) in subsection (a) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “in the Air Force” and inserting “in the Department of the Air Force”; and
(7) AIR FORCE ACADEMY ESTABLISHMENT; SUPERINTENDENT; FACULTY.—Section 9431(a) of such title is amended by striking “Air Force cadets” and inserting “cadets”.
(8) AIR FORCE ACADEMY SUPERINTENDENT; FACULTY: APPOINTMENT AND DETAIL.—Section 9433(a) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “Air Force”.
(9) AIR FORCE ACADEMY PERMANENT PROFESSORS; DIRECTOR OF ADMISSIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 9436 of such title is amended—
(i) in subsection (a)—
(I) in the first sentence, by inserting “in the Air Force or the equivalent grade in the Space Force” after “colonel”;
(10) CADETS: APPOINTMENT; NUMBERS, TERRITORIAL DISTRIBUTION.—
(12) CADETS: ORGANIZATION; SERVICE; INSTRUCTION.—Section 9449 of such title is amended by striking subsection (d).
(14) CADETS: DEGREE AND COMMISSION ON GRADUATION.—Section 9453(b) of such title is amended by inserting “or in the equivalent grade in the Regular Space Force” after “Regular Air Force”.
(15) SUPPORT OF ATHLETIC PROGRAMS.—Section 9462(c)(2) of such title is amended by striking “personnel of the Air Force” and inserting “personnel of the Department of the Air Force”.
(e) Service, supply, and procurement.—
(1) EQUIPMENT: BAKERIES, SCHOOLS, KITCHENS, AND MESS HALLS.—Section 9536 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting “or the Space Force” after “the Air Force”.
(2) RATIONS.—Section 9561 of such title is amended—
(3) CLOTHING.—Section 9562 of such title is amended by inserting “and members of the Space Force” after “the Air Force”.
(4) CLOTHING: REPLACEMENT WHEN DESTROYED TO PREVENT CONTAGION.—Section 9563 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “member of the Air Force”.
(5) COLORS, STANDARDS, AND GUIDONS OF DEMOBILIZED ORGANIZATIONS: DISPOSITION.—Section 9565 of such title is amended—
(6) UTILITIES: PROCEEDS FROM OVERSEAS OPERATIONS.—Section 9591 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “the Air Force”.
(7) QUARTERS: HEAT AND LIGHT.—Section 9593 of such title is amended by inserting “and members of the Space Force” after “the Air Force”.
(8) AIR FORCE MILITARY HISTORY INSTITUTE: FEE FOR PROVIDING HISTORICAL INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 9594 of such title is amended—
(C) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 967 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9594 and inserting the following new item:
“9594. Department of the Air Force Military History Institute: fee for providing historical information to the public.”.
(9) SUBSISTENCE AND OTHER SUPPLIES: MEMBERS OF ARMED FORCES; VETERANS; EXECUTIVE OR MILITARY DEPARTMENTS AND EMPLOYEES; PRICES.—Section 9621 of such title is amended—
(10) RATIONS: COMMISSIONED OFFICERS IN FIELD.—Section 9622 of such title is amended by inserting “and commissioned officers of the Space Force” after “officers of the Air Force”.
(11) MEDICAL SUPPLIES: CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF THE AIR FORCE.—Section 9624(a) of such title is amended—
(12) ORDNANCE PROPERTY: OFFICERS OF ARMED FORCES; CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES OF AIR FORCE.—
(15) DISPOSITION OF EFFECTS OF DECEASED PERSONS BY SUMMARY COURT-MARTIAL.—Section 9712(a)(1) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “the Air Force”.
(16) ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS: LAND FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAINING, SUPPLY BASE, OR AVIATION FIELD.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 9771 of such title is amended in paragraph (2) by inserting “or space mission-related facility” after “aviation field”.
(C) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 979 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 9771 and inserting the following new item:
“9771. Acceptance of donations: land for mobilization, training, supply base, aviation field, or space mission-related facility.”.
(17) ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION: AIR BASES AND DEPOTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 9773 of such title is amended—
(i) in subsection (a)—
(ii) in subsections (b) and (c), by striking “air bases” each place it appears and inserting “installations”;
(18) EMERGENCY CONSTRUCTION: FORTIFICATIONS.—Section 9776 of such title is amended by striking “air base” and inserting “installation”.
(20) DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY AT MISSILE SITES.—Section 9781(a)(2) of such title is amended—
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “Air Force” and inserting “Department of the Air Force”;
(21) MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF REAL PROPERTY.—Section 9782 of such title is amended in subsections (c) and (d) by inserting “or the Space Force” after “the Air Force” both places it appears.
(22) SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNTS: REMISSION OR CANCELLATION OF INDEBTEDNESS OF MEMBERS.—Section 9837(a) of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “member of the Air Force”.
(23) FINAL SETTLEMENT OF OFFICER’S ACCOUNTS.—
(f) Service of incumbents in certain positions without reappointment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The individual serving in a position under a provision of law specified in paragraph (2) as of the date of the enactment of this Act may continue to serve in such position after that date without further appointment as otherwise provided by such provision of law, notwithstanding the amendment of such provision of law by subsection (b).
(a) Definitions.—Section 101(b)(13) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in paragraph (13), by striking “or Marine Corps” and inserting “Marine Corps, or Space Force”.
(b) Other provisions of subtitle A.—
(1) SPACE FORCE I.—Subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by striking “and Marine Corps” each place it appears and inserting “Marine Corps, and Space Force” in the following provisions:
(2) SPACE FORCE II.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Such subtitle is further amended by striking “Marine Corps,” each place it appears and inserting “Marine Corps, Space Force,” in the following provisions:
(3) SPACE FORCE III.—Such subtitle is further amended by striking “or Marine Corps” each place it appears and inserting “Marine Corps, or Space Force” in the following provisions:
(4) REGULAR SPACE FORCE I.—Such subtitle is further amended by striking “or Regular Marine Corps” each place it appears and inserting “Regular Marine Corps, or Regular Space Force” in the following provisions:
(5) REGULAR SPACE FORCE II.—Such subtitle is further amended by striking “Regular Marine Corps,” each place it appears and inserting “Regular Marine Corps, Regular Space Force,” in the following provisions:
(6) TRANSFER, ETC. OF FUNCTIONS, POWERS, AND DUTIES.—Section 125(b) of such title, as amended by paragraph (3)(A), is further amended by striking “or 9062(c)” and inserting “9062(c), or 9081”.
(7) JOINT STAFF MATTERS.—
(A) APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN; GRADE AND RANK.—Section 152 of such title is amended—
(B) INCLUSION OF SPACE FORCE ON JOINT STAFF.—Section 155(a) of such title is amended—
(iii) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):
“(3) Officers of the Space Force assigned to serve on the Joint Staff shall be selected by the Chairman in a number that, to the extent practicable, bears the same proportion to the numbers of officers of the armed forces selected under paragraph (2) as the number of Regular members of the Space Force bears to the number of Regular members of the armed forces specified in that paragraph (with the Navy and the Marine Corps treated as a single armed force for purposes of this paragraph).”.
(9) JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL.—Section 181(c)(1) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
(11) THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION EXPENSES.—Section 312(b)(3) of such title is amended by inserting “the Chief of Space Operations,” after “the Commandant of the Marine Corps,”.
(12) WESTERN HEMISPHERE INSTITUTE.—Section 343(e)(1)(E) of such title is amended by inserting “or Space Force” after “for the Air Force”.
(13) ORIGINAL APPOINTMENTS OF COMMISSIONED OFFICERS.—Section 531(a) of such title is amended—
(14) SERVICE CREDIT UPON ORIGINAL APPOINTMENT AS A COMMISSIONED OFFICER.—Section 533(b)(2) of such title is amended by striking “or captain in the Navy” and inserting “, captain in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force”.
(15) SENIOR JOINT OFFICER POSITIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Section 604(a)(1)(A) of such title is amended by inserting “and the name of at least one Space Force officer” after “Air Force officer”.
(16) FORCE SHAPING AUTHORITY.—Section 647(a)(2) of such title is amended by striking “of that armed force”.
(17) MEMBERS: REQUIRED SERVICE.—Section 651(b) of such title is amended by striking “of his armed force”.
(18) CAREER FLEXIBILITY TO ENHANCE RETENTION OF MEMBERS.—Section 710(c)(1) of such title is amended by striking “the armed force concerned” and inserting “an armed force”.
(19) SENIOR MEMBERS OF MILITARY STAFF COMMITTEE OF UNITED NATIONS.—Section 711 of such title is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” after “Air Force”.
(20) RANK: CHIEF OF SPACE OPERATIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 743 of such title is amended by striking “and the Commandant of the Marine Corps” and inserting “the Commandant of the Marine Corps, and the Chief of Space Operations”.
(21) UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE.—Chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended—
(A) in section 822(a)(7) (article 22(a)(7)), by striking “Marine Corps” and inserting “Marine Corps, or the commanding officer of a corresponding unit of the Space Force”;
(22) SERVICE AS CADET OR MIDSHIPMAN NOT COUNTED FOR LENGTH OF SERVICE.—Section 971(b)(2) of such title is amended by striking “or Air Force” and inserting “, Air Force, or Space Force”.
(23) REFERRAL BONUS.—Section 1030(h)(3) of such title is amended by inserting “and the Space Force” after “concerning the Air Force”.
(24) RETURN TO ACTIVE DUTY FROM TEMPORARY DISABILITY.—Section 1211(a) of such title is amended—
(25) YEARS OF SERVICE.—Section 1405(c) of such title is amended by striking “or Air Force” and inserting “, Air Force, or Space Force”.
(26) RETIRED PAY BASE FOR PERSONS WHO BECAME MEMBERS BEFORE SEPTEMBER 8, 1980.—Section 1406 of such title is amended—
(27) SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MILITARY PERSONNEL IN THE ACQUISITION FIELD.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 1722a(a) of such title is amended by striking “and the Commandant of the Marine Corps (with respect to the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, respectively)” and inserting “, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, and the Chief of Space Operations (with respect to the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force, respectively)”.
(28) SENIOR MILITARY ACQUISITION ADVISORS.—Section 1725(e)(1)(C) of such title is amended by inserting “and Space Force” before the period.
(29) MILITARY FAMILY READINESS COUNCIL.—Section 1781a(b)(1) of such title is amended by striking “Marine Corps, and Air Force” each place it appears and inserting “Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force”.
(30) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SPECIALLY SELECTED MEMBERS.—Section 2107 of such title is amended—
(31) SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE.—Section 2273a(d) of such title is amended by striking paragraph (3).
(c) Provisions of subtitle b.—
(d) Provisions of subtitle C.—
(1) CADETS; HAZING.—Section 8464(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “or Marine Corps” and inserting “Marine Corps, or Space Force”.
(2) SALES PRICES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 8802 of such title is amended by striking “or the Air Force” and inserting “, the Air Force, or the Space Force”.
(3) SALES TO CERTAIN VETERANS.—Section 8803 of such title is amended by striking “or the Marine Corps” and inserting “the Marine Corps, or the Space Force”.
(a) Definitions.—Section 101 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Basic pay rates.—
(1) COMMISSIONED OFFICERS.—Footnote 2 of the table titled “COMMISSIONED OFFICERS” in section 601(c) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 37 U.S.C. 1009 note) is amended by inserting after “Commandant of the Marine Corps,” the following: “Chief of Space Operations,”.
(2) ENLISTED MEMBERS.—Footnote 2 of the table titled “ENLISTED MEMBERS” in section 601(c) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 37 U.S.C. 1009 note) is amended by inserting after “Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps,” the following: “the senior enlisted advisor of the Space Force,”.
(c) Pay grades: assignment to; general rules.—Section 201(a) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking “(a) For the purpose” and inserting “(a)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), for the purpose”; and
(e) Allowances other than travel and transportation allowances.—
(f) Travel and transportation allowances: parking expenses.—Section 481i(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “or Marine Corps” and inserting “Marine Corps, or Space Force”.
(g) Leave.—
(1) ADDITION OF SPACE FORCE.—Chapter 9 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting “Space Force,” after “Marines Corps,” each place it appears in the following provisions:
(2) ADDITION OF REGULAR SPACE FORCE.—Section 501(b)(5)(C) of such title is amended by striking “or Regular Marine Corps” and inserting “Regular Marine Corps, or Regular Space Force”.
(h) Allotment and assignment of pay.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsections (a), (c), and (d) of section 701 of title 37, United States Code, are each amended by striking “or Marine Corps” and inserting “Marine Corps, or Space Force”.
(4) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 13 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 701 and inserting the following new item:
“701. Members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Space Force; contract surgeons.”.
(i) Forfeiture of pay.—
(1) FORFEITURE FOR ABSENCE FOR INTEMPERATE USE OF ALCOHOL OR DRUGS.—
(2) FORFEITURE WHEN DROPPED FROM ROLLS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 803 of such title is amended by striking “or the Air Force” and inserting “, the Air Force, or the Space Force”.
(j) Effect on pay of extension of enlistment.—Section 906 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting “Space Force,” after “Marine Corps,”.
(k) Administration of pay.—
(1) PROMPT PAYMENT REQUIRED.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 1005 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “and of the Air Force” and inserting “, the Air Force, and the Space Force”.
(C) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 803 and inserting the following new item:
“1005. Army, Air Force, and Space Force: prompt payments required.”.
(a) Addition of space service to references to military, Naval, or air service.—Title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “or air service” and inserting “air, or space service” each place it appears in the following provisions:
(b) Definitions.—
(1) ARMED FORCES.—Paragraph (10) of section 101 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting “Space Force,” after “Air Force,”.
(c) Placement of employees in military installations.—Section 701 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “and Air Force” and inserting “Air Force, and Space Force”.
(d) Consideration to be accorded time, place, and circumstances of service.—Section 1154(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “or air organization” and inserting “air, or space organization”.
(e) Premium payments.—Section 1908 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting “Space Force,” after “Marine Corps,”.
(f) Secretary concerned for GI Bill.—Section 3020(l)(3) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or the Space Force” before the semicolon.
(a) Title 5; definition of Armed Forces.—Section 2101(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “Marine Corps,” the following: “Space Force,”.
(b) Title 14.—
(c) Title 18; firearms as nonmailable.—Section 1715 of such title is amended by inserting “Space Force,” after “Marine Corps,”.
(d) Title 31.—
(a) Secretary of Defense authority.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense with respect to the Air Force or members of the Air Force under any covered provision of law may be exercised by the Secretary with respect to the Space Force or members of the Space Force.
(b) Secretary of the Air Force authority.—The authority of the Secretary of the Air Force with respect to the Air Force or members of the Air Force under any covered provision of law may be exercised with respect to the Space Force or members of the Space Force.
(a) Limitation on establishment of Space National Guard.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Space National Guard may not be established as a reserve component of the Space Force until the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing, to the congressional defense committees that a Space National Guard is the organization best suited to discharge in an effective and efficient manner the missions intended to be assigned to the Space National Guard.
(b) Space Force Reserve.—
(1) INCLUSION WITHIN SPACE FORCE.—Section 9081(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, including the Regular Space Force and the Space Force Reserve,” after “space forces”.
(3) COMPOSITION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1003 of such title is amended—
(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1003 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 10114 and inserting the following new items:
“10114. Space Force Reserve: composition.
“10115. Coast Guard Reserve.”.
(4) SPACE FORCE RESERVE COMMAND.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1006 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 10175. Space Force Reserve Command
“(a) Establishment of command.—The Secretary of the Air Force, with the advice and assistance of the Chief of Space Operations, shall establish a Space Force Reserve Command. The Space Force Reserve Command shall be operated as a separate command of the Space Force.
“(b) Commander.—The Chief of Space Force Reserve is the Commander of the Space Force Reserve Command. The commander of the Space Force Reserve Command reports directly to the Chief of Space Operations.
“(c) Assignment of forces.—The Secretary of the Air Force—
“(1) shall assign to the Space Force Reserve Command all forces of the Space Force Reserve stationed in the continental United States other than forces assigned to the unified combatant command for special operations forces established pursuant to section 167 of this title; and
“(2) except as otherwise directed by the Secretary of Defense in the case of forces assigned to carry out functions of the Secretary of the Air Force specified in section 9013 of this title, shall assign to the combatant commands all such forces assigned to the Space Force Reserve Command under paragraph (1) in the manner specified by the Secretary of Defense.”.
(c) Military personnel management.—Any authority in title 10, United States Code, may be applied to a member of the Space Force Reserve in the same manner as such authority is applied to a similarly situated member of the Air Force Reserve. In the application of such authority to a member of the Space Force Reserve, any reference to a grade of a member of in the Air Force or Air Force Reserve shall be deemed to refer to the equivalent grade in the Space Force or Space Force Reserve.
(d) Report on integration of Space Force Reserve into law.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House or Representatives a report setting forth the amendments to title 10, United States Code, and any other laws, necessary to fully integrate the Space Force Reserve into statutory authorities on the personnel, activities, missions, and management of the Space Force.
(a) Prohibition on involuntary transfer.—A member of the Armed Forces or civilian employee of the Department of Defense may not be transferred to the military or civilian part of the Space Force, as the case may be, without the consent of such member or employee.
(b) Status within Space Force upon transfer.—Any member of the Armed Forces or civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is transferred to the Space Force shall, after transfer, have the status of member or civilian employee, as the case may be, of the Space Force.
(a) Limitation.—A military installation (whether or not under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Air Force) may not be transferred to the jurisdiction or command of the Space Force until the Secretary of the Air Force briefs the congressional defense committees on the results of a business case analysis, conducted by the Secretary in connection with the transfer, of the cost and efficacy of the transfer.
(a) In general.—Chapter 963 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before section 9532 the following new section:
Section 517 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to the Space Force until October 1, 2023.
(a) In general.—Chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 1599i. Application of acquisition demonstration project to Department of the Air Force employees assigned to acquisition positions within the Space Force
“For purposes of the demonstration project authorized by section 1762 of this title, the Secretary of Defense may apply the provisions of such section, including any regulations, procedures, waivers, or guidance implementing such section, to employees of the Department of the Air Force assigned to acquisition positions within the Space Force.”.
(a) Supersedure of Airman's Medal with Air and Space Force Medal.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 9280 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Differentiation in design.—The President shall ensure that the design of the Air and Space Force Medal and accompanying ribbon (and any related bar or device) awarded under section 9280 of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)), differs in an appropriate manner from the design of the Airman's Medal and accompanying ribbon, bar, or device awarded under section 9280 of title 10, United States Code, as such section was in effect on the date before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) In general.—Subchapter I of chapter 134 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2245 the following new section:
Ҥ 2246. Establishment of field operating agencies: annual report
“(a) Annual report required.—Not later than January 31 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on each, if any, field operating agency established during the preceding year.
“(b) Elements.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include, for each field operating agency covered by such report, the following:
“(4) The chain of command, supervision, or authority through which the head of such agency reports to the Office of the Secretary of Defense or the military department or Armed Forces headquarters, as applicable.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, with appropriate representatives of the Armed Forces, shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the feasibility and the current status of assigning members of the Armed Forces on active duty to the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) of the Department of Defense. The briefing shall include an assessment of such assignment on each of the following:
(1) The strengthening of ties between the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center and operational forces for purposes of—
(2) The creation of opportunities for additional non-traditional broadening assignments for members on active duty.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(b) Executive agent.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army is the executive agent of the Department of Defense for programs, projects, and activities to counter small unmanned aerial systems (in this section referred to as the “Counter-Small Unmanned Aerial Systems Program”).
(c) Strategy To counter threats from small unmanned aerial systems.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army, as executive agent for the Counter-Small Unmanned Aerial Systems Program, shall develop and submit to relevant committees of Congress a strategy for the Armed Forces to effectively counter threats from small unmanned aerial systems worldwide. The report shall be submitted in classified form.
(d) Report on executive agent activities.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army, as executive agent for the Counter-Small Unmanned Aerial Systems Program, shall submit to Congress a report on the Counter-Small Unmanned Aerial Systems Program.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(e) Report on threat from small unmanned aerial systems.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the submittal of the strategy required by subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that sets forth a direct comparison between the threats United States forces in combat settings face from small unmanned aerial systems and the capabilities of the United States to counter such threats. The report shall be submitted in classified form.
(2) COORDINATION.—The Secretary shall prepare the report required by paragraph (1) in coordination with the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and with such other appropriate officials of the intelligence community, and such other officials in the United States Government, as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(3) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(f) Independent assessment of Counter-Small Unmanned Aerial Systems Program.—
(1) ASSESSMENT.—Not later than 60 days after the submittal of the strategy required by subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a Federally funded research and development center to conduct an assessment of the efficacy of the Counter-Small Unmanned Aerial Systems Program.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An identification of metrics to assess progress in the implementation of the strategy required by subsection (c), which metrics shall take into account the threat assessment required for purposes of subsection (e).
(B) An assessment of progress, and key challenges, in the implementation of the strategy using such metrics, and recommendations for improvements in the implementation of the strategy.
(C) An assessment of the extent to which the Department of Defense is coordinating adequately with other departments and agencies of the United States Government, and other appropriate entities, in the development and procurement of counter-small unmanned aerial systems for the Department.
(a) Authority To transfer authorizations.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2021 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(b) Limitations.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—
Section 240b(a)(2)(A)(iii) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “for fiscal year 2018” and all that follows and inserting “for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2020 occurs by not later than March 31 following such fiscal year;”.
(a) Incentives required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall, acting through the Deputy Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Defense, develop and issue guidance to incentivize the achievement by each department, agency, and other component of the Department of Defense of unqualified audit opinions on their financial statements.
(b) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a description and assessment of current and proposed incentives for the achievement of unqualified audit opinions as described in subsection (a).
(a) Codification of section 1022 of FY 2004 NDAA.—Chapter 15 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end a new section 285 consisting of—
(2) a text consisting of the text of section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (10 U.S.C. 271 note).
(b) Conforming amendments in connection with codification.—Section 285 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), is amended—
(1) in subsection (b), by striking “During fiscal years 2006 through 2022, funds for drug interdiction” and inserting “Funds for drug interdiction”;
(2) in subsection (c), by striking “of each year in which the authority in subsection (a) is in effect” and inserting “each year”;
(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 15 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“285. Authority for joint task forces to support law enforcement agencies conducting counterterrorism or counter-transnational organized crime activities.”.
Section 2218(f)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 8680 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection: (c)
“(c) Waiver.— (1) The Secretary of the Navy may waive the restrictions in subsections (a) and (b) for the duration of a period of threat to the national security interests of the United States upon a written determination by the Secretary that such a waiver is necessary in the national security interest of the United States.
“(2) Not later than 15 days after making a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a written notification on the determination.
“(3) In this subsection, the term ‘period of threat to the national security interests of the United States’ means the following:
“(B) Any other period determined by Secretary of Defense in which the national security interests of the United States are threatened by the application, or the imminent danger of application, of physical force by any foreign government or agency against the United States, citizens of the United States, the property of citizens of the United States, or the commercial interests of citizens of the United States.”.
(a) In general.—Section 1046(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1556) is amended by striking “certifies” and inserting “, with the concurrence of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, certifies in writing”.
(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to waivers under subsection (b)(1) of section 1046 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 of the prohibition under subsection (a) of that section that occur on or after that date.
Section 1014(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4585), as most recently amended by section 1023(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 966), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2020” and inserting “September 30, 2025”.
It is the sense of Congress that to achieve the national policy of the United States to have available, as soon as practicable, not fewer than 355 battle force ships—
(1) the Navy must be adequately resourced to increase the size of the Navy in accordance with the national policy, which includes the associated ships, aircraft, personnel, sustainment, and munitions;
(3) new guided missile frigate construction should increase to a rate of between two and four ships per year once design maturity and construction readiness permit;
(4) the Columbia-class submarine program should be funded with additions to the Navy budget significantly above the historical average, given the critical single national mission that these vessels will perform and the high priority of the shipbuilding budget for implementing the National Defense Strategy;
Section 1033 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1953), as amended by section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
Section 1036 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1551), as most recently amended by section 1045 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2018, 2019, or 2020” and inserting “fiscal years 2018 through 2021”.
Section 1035 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1954), as amended by section 1042 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
Section 1034(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1954), as amended by section 1044 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
(a) Inclusion.—Subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “disaster-related emergency preparedness,” after “counterterrorism,”.
(b) Preference in transfers.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended to read as follows:
“(d) Preference for certain transfers.—In considering applications for the transfer of personal property under this section, the Secretary shall give a preference to applications indicating that the transferred property will be used in the counterdrug, counterterrorism, disaster-related emergency preparedness, or border security activities of the recipient agency. Applications that request vehicles used for disaster-related emergency preparedness, such as high-water rescue vehicles, should receive the highest preference.”.
(a) Authority.—Subject to subsections (b) through (d), the Secretary of Defense may expend up to $15,000,000 in any fiscal year for clandestine activities for any purpose the Secretary determines to be proper for preparation of the environment for operations of a confidential nature. Such a determination is final and conclusive upon the accounting officers of the United States. The Secretary may certify the amount of any such expenditure authorized by the Secretary that the Secretary considers advisable not to specify, and the Secretary's certificate is sufficient voucher for the expenditure of that amount.
(b) Funds.—Funds for expenditures under this section in a fiscal year shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for that fiscal year for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide.
(c) Limitation on delegation.—The Secretary of Defense may not delegate the authority under this section with respect to any expenditure in excess of $100,000.
(d) Exclusion of intelligence activities.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—This section does not constitute authority to conduct, or expend funds for, intelligence, counterintelligence, or intelligence-related activities.
(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the terms “intelligence” and “counterintelligence” have the meaning given those terms in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(e) Annual report.—Not later than December 31 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on expenditures made under this section during the fiscal year preceding the year in which the report is submitted. Each report shall include, for each expenditure under this section during the fiscal year covered by such report—
(a) Clarification.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter IV of chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) Authority to punish.— (1) With respect to any proceeding under this chapter, a judicial officer specified in paragraph (2) may punish for contempt any person who—
“(A) uses any menacing word, sign, or gesture in the presence of the judicial officer during the proceeding;
“(b) Punishment.—The punishment for contempt under subsection (a) may not exceed confinement for 30 days, a fine of $1,000, or both.
“(c) Review.— (1) A punishment under this section—
“(B) if imposed by a military judge, shall constitute a judgment, subject to review in the first instance only by the United States Court of Military Commission Review and then only by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and
“(C) if imposed by a judge of the United States Court of Military Commission Review, shall constitute a judgment of the court subject to review only by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
“(2) In reviewing a punishment for contempt imposed under this section, the reviewing court shall affirm such punishment unless the court finds that imposing such punishment was an abuse of the discretion of the judicial officer who imposed such punishment.
“(3) A petition for review of punishment for contempt imposed under this section shall be filed not later than 60 days after the date on which the authenticated record upon which the contempt punishment is based and any contempt proceedings conducted by the judicial officer are served on the person punished for contempt.
“(d) Punishment not conviction.—Punishment for contempt is not a conviction or sentence within the meaning of section 949m of this title. The imposition of punishment for contempt is not governed by other provisions of this chapter applicable to military commissions, except that the Secretary of Defense may prescribe procedures for contempt proceedings and punishments, pursuant to the authority provided in section 949a of this title.”.
Amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act shall not be used for any program, project, or activity, or any use of personnel, to conduct actions against United States citizens that infringe upon their rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution peaceably to assemble and/or to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
(a) Arctic planning and implementation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall begin planning and implementing such changes as may be necessary for requirements, training, equipment, doctrine, and capability development of the Armed Forces should an expanded role of the Armed Forces in the Arctic be determined by the Secretary to be in the national security interests of the United States.
(b) Arctic research and development program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—If pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense determines that an expanded role for the Armed Forces is in the national security interests of the United States, the Secretary shall establish a research and development program on the current and future requirements and needs of the Armed Forces for operations in the Arctic.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The program required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) Development of materiel solutions for operating in extreme weather environments of the Arctic, including equipment for individual members of the Armed Forces, ground vehicles, and communications systems.
(B) Development of a plan for fielding future weapons platforms able to operate in Arctic conditions for surface combatants, submarines, aviation platforms, assault craft unit connectors, auxiliaries, littoral craft, unmanned aerial vehicles, and any other systems that may be needed in the Arctic.
The Secretary of Defense shall take into account the security risks of 5G and 6G telecommunications network architecture, including the use of telecommunications equipment provided by at-risk vendors such as Huawei Technologies Company, Ltd., and the Zhongxing Telecommunications Equipment Corporation (ZTE), in all future overseas stationing decisions of the Department of Defense, including—
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—The term “covered individuals” means any foreign national (except foreign nationals of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom who have been granted a security clearance that is reciprocally accepted by the United States for access to classified information) who—
(A) is seeking physical access to a Department of Defense installation or facility within the United States; and
(c) Establishment of vetting procedures; monitoring requirements for certain military training.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF VETTING PROCEDURES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures to vet covered individuals for eligibility for physical access to Department of Defense installations and facilities within the United States, including—
(B) INFORMATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall identify the information required to conduct the vetting.
(2) DETERMINATION AUTHORITY.—
(A) REVIEW.—The results of vetting—
(B) EFFECT OF DENIAL.—If the organization recommends that a covered individual not be authorized physical access to Department of Defense installations and facilities within the United States, such physical access may only be authorized for such covered individual by the Secretary of Defense or the Deputy Secretary of Defense.
(3) ADDITIONAL SECURITY MEASURES.—Beginning on the date that is 181 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(A) ensure that all Department of Defense Common Access Cards issued to foreign nationals in the United States—
(B) ensure that physical access by covered individuals is limited, as appropriate, to Department of Defense installations or facilities within the United States that are directly associated with their training or education or necessary to access authorized benefits;
(d) Reporting requirements.—
(1) BRIEFING.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees regarding the establishment of any Department of Defense policy or guidance related to the implementation of this section.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees regarding the impact and effects of this section, including—
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that any adverse event related to a consumer product that occurs on a military installation is reported on the internet website saferproducts.gov.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ADVERSE EVENT.—The term “adverse event” means—
(A) any event that indicates that a consumer product—
(i) fails to comply with an applicable consumer product safety rule or with a voluntary consumer product safety standard upon which the Consumer Product Safety Commission has relied under section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2058);
(ii) fails to comply with any other rule, regulation, standard, or ban under that Act or any other Act enforced by the Commission;
(iii) contains a defect which could create a substantial product hazard described in section 15(a)(2) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2064(a)(2)); or
(B) any other harm described in subsection (b)(1)(A) of section 6A of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2055a) and required to be reported in the database established under subsection (a) of that section.
(2) CONSUMER PRODUCT.—The term “consumer product” has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2052).
Section 508(d) of title 32, United States Code, is amended—
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, through the Veterinary Service Activity of the Department of Defense, shall establish a standardized policy applicable across all military communities for the regulation of dangerous dogs that is—
(b) Regulations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prescribe regulations implementing the policy established under subsection (a).
(2) BEST PRACTICES.—The regulations prescribed under paragraph (1) shall include strategies, for implementation within all military communities, for the prevention of dog bites that are consistent with the following best practices:
(A) Enforcement of comprehensive, non-breed-specific regulations relating to dangerous dogs, with emphasis on identification of dangerous dog behavior and chronically irresponsible owners.
(c) Military communities defined.—In this section, the term “military communities” means—
(2) all military housing, including privatized military housing under subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code.
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Air Force, as part of the strategic basing process for KC–46A aircraft at installations outside the contiguous United States (OCONUS), should—
(1) consider the benefits derived from basing such aircraft at locations that—
(A) support day-to-day air refueling operations, operations plans of multiple combatant commands, and flexibility for contingency operations;
(B) have—
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall issue revised guidance authorizing and directing Government agencies and their appropriately cleared contractors to process, store, use, and discuss sensitive compartmented information (SCI) at facilities previously approved to handle such information, without need for further approval by agency or by site. Such guidance shall apply to controlled access programs of the intelligence community and to special access programs of the Department of Defense.
(a) Definition of Secretary.—In this section, the term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Agriculture.
(b) Findings.—Congress finds that—
(1) according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the suicide rate is 45 percent greater in rural areas of the United States than the suicide rate in urban areas of the United States;
(c) Public service announcement campaign to address farm and ranch mental health.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall carry out a public service announcement campaign to address the mental health of farmers and ranchers.
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The public service announcement campaign under paragraph (1) shall include television, radio, print, outdoor, and digital public service announcements.
(d) Employee training program to manage farmer and rancher stress.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 6912 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 224B. Employee training program to manage farmer and rancher stress.
“(a) In general.—The Secretary shall establish a voluntary program to train employees of the Farm Service Agency, the Risk Management Agency, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service in the management of stress experienced by farmers and ranchers, including the detection of stress and suicide prevention.
“(b) Requirement.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary submits a report on the results of the pilot program being carried out by the Secretary as of the date of enactment of this section to train employees of the Department in the management of stress experienced by farmers and ranchers, and based on the recommendations contained in that report, the Secretary shall develop a training program to carry out subsection (a).
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(A) Subtitle A of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 is amended by redesignating section 225 (7 U.S.C. 6925) as section 224A.
(B) Section 296(b) of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 7014(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(e) Task force for assessment of causes of mental stress and best practices for response.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convene a task force of agricultural and rural stakeholders at the national, State, and local levels—
(a) Additional training of recipient agency personnel required.—Subsection (b)(6) of section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, including respect for the rights of citizens under the Constitution of the United States and de-escalation of force”.
(a) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than December 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the results of a review and assessment, obtained by the Secretary for purposes of the report, of the potential effects on the military education provided by the educational institutions of the Department of Defense specified in subsection (b) of the actions described in subsection (c).
(b) Educational institutions of the Department of Defense.—The educational institutions of the Department of Defense specified in this subsection are the following:
(c) Actions.—The actions described in this subsection with respect to the educational institutions of the Department of Defense specified in subsection (b) are the following:
(6) Modification of military personnel career milestones in order to prioritize instructor positions.
(7) Increase in educational and performance requirements for military personnel selected to be instructors.
(d) Additional elements.—In addition to the matters described in subsection (a), the review and report under this section shall also include the following:
(1) A comparison of admission standards and graduation requirements of the educational institutions of the Department of Defense specified in subsection (b) with admission standards and graduation requirements of public and private institutions of higher education that are comparable to the educational institutions of the Department of Defense.
(e) JCS evaluation of review and assessment.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the report required by subsection (a) is submitted to Congress, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall, in consultation with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth any evaluation by the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the review and assessment covered by the report under subsection (a).
(a) Report on status.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the North Warning System.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description and assessment of the status and operational integrity of the infrastructure of the North Warning System.
(B) An assessment of the technology currently used by the North Warning System compared with the technology considered necessary by the Commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command to detect current and anticipated threats.
(b) Report on plan for modernization.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a plan for the modernization of the capabilities provided by the current North Warning System.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A detailed timeline for the modernization of the North Warning System based on the status of the system as reported pursuant to subsection (a).
(B) The technological advancements necessary for ground-based North Warning System sites to address current and anticipated threats (as specified by the Commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command).
(C) An assessment of the number of future North Warning System sites required in order to address current and anticipated threats (as so specified).
(a) Studies required.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for performance of three studies on the force structure for Marine Corps aviation through 2030.
(b) Responsibility for studies.—One of the three studies performed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be performed by each of the following:
(2) An appropriate Federally funded research and development center (FFRDC), as selected by the Secretary for purposes of this section.
(3) An appropriate organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such code, as selected by the Secretary for purposes of this section.
(c) Performance.—
(1) INDEPENDENT PERFORMANCE.—Each study performed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be performed independently of each other such study,
(2) MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED.—In performing a study pursuant to subsection, the officer or entity performing the study take into account, within the context of the current force structure for Marine Corps aviation, the following:
(d) Study results.—The results of each study performed pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) The various force structures for Marine Corps aviation through 2030 considered under such study, together with the assumptions and possible scenarios identified for each such force structure.
(2) A recommendation for the force structure for Marine Corps aviation through 2030, including the following in connection with such force structure:
(A) Numbers and type of aviation assets, numbers and types of associated unmanned assets, and basic capabilities of each such asset.
(a) Study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in consultation with the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor, shall conduct a study on why Post-9/11 Veterans who are female are at higher risk of unemployment than all other groups of female veterans and their non-veteran counterparts.
(2) CONDUCT OF STUDY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall conduct the study under paragraph (1) primarily through the Center for Women Veterans under section 318 of title 38, United States Code.
(3) ELEMENTS OF STUDY.—The study conducted under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to Post-9/11 Veterans who are female, at a minimum, an analysis of the following:
(D) The percentage of such veterans who enrolled in an education or employment training program of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Labor after such separation.
(I) Current employment training programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Department of Labor that are available to such veterans.
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after completing the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on such study.
(a) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a report to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives containing the results of the review and an explanation of the methodology used for the review conducted pursuant to subsection (b) regarding the screening practices for foreign cargo arriving at seaports on the Great Lakes and inland waterways.
(b) Scope of review.—
(1) SEAPORT SELECTION.—In selecting seaports on inland waterways to include in the review under this subsection, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that the inland waterways seaports are—
(2) ELEMENTS.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall conduct a review of all Great Lakes and selected inland waterways seaports that receive international cargo—
(A) to determine, for each such seaport—
(i) the current screening capability, including the types and numbers of screening equipment and whether such equipment is physically located at a seaport or assigned and available in the area and made available to use;
(ii) the number of U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel assigned from a Field Operations office, broken out by role;
(iii) the expenditures for procurement and overtime incurred by U.S. Customs and Border Protection during the most recent fiscal year;
(a) Report required.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Chemical and Biological Defense Program of the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the significance of the Chemical and Biological Defense Program within the 2018 National Defense Strategy.
(2) A description and assessment of the threats the Chemical and Biological Defense Program is designed to address.
(3) An assessment of the capacity of current Chemical and Biological Defense Program facilities to complete their missions if funding levels for the Program are reduced.
(4) An estimate of the length of time required to return the Chemical and Biological Defense Program to its current capacity if funding levels reduced for the Program as described in paragraph (3) are restored.
(a) In general.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the results of a study, conducted by the Secretary for purposes of the report, on the feasibility and advisability of making round-the-clock childcare available for children of members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense who works on rotating shifts at military installations.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(2) If the Secretary determines that making round-the-clock childcare available as described in subsection (a) is feasible and advisable, such matters as the Secretary considers appropriate in connection with making such childcare available, including—
(A) an identification of the installations at which such childcare would be beneficial to members of the Armed Forces, civilian employees of the Department, or both;
(B) an identification of any barriers to making such childcare available at the installations identified pursuant to subparagraph (A);
(C) an assessment whether the childcare needs of members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department described in subsection (a) would be better met by an increase in assistance for childcare fees;
(a) Report.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an updated assessment of the estimated cost of constructing, maintaining, and operating a strategic port in the Arctic at each potential site evaluated in the report pursuant to section 1752(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92). The report under this subsection shall include, for each potential site at which construction of such a port could be completed by 2030, an estimate of the number of days per year that such port would be usable by vessels of the Navy and the Coast Guard.
(b) Designation of strategic Arctic ports.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the report required by subsection (a) is submitted, the Secretary of Defense may, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commanding General of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the Administrator of the Maritime Administration, designate one or more ports as Department of Defense Strategic Arctic Ports from the sites identified in the report referred to in subsection (a).
(c) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize any additional appropriations for the Department of Defense for the establishment of any port designated pursuant to this section.
(d) Arctic defined.—In this section, the term “Arctic” has the meaning given that term in section 112 of the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 (15 U.S.C. 4111).
(a) Briefings on fielding of newest generations of PPE to the Armed Forces.—
(1) BRIEFINGS REQUIRED.—Not later than January 31, 2021, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to Congress a briefing on the fielding of the newest generations of personal protective equipment (PPE) to the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each briefing under paragraph (1) shall include, for each Armed Force covered by such briefing, the following:
(A) A description and assessment of the fielding of newest generations of personal protective equipment to members of such Armed Force, including the following:
(i) The number (aggregated by total number and by sex) of members of such Armed Force issued the Army Soldiers Protective System and the Modular Scalable Vest Generation II body armor as of December 31, 2020.
(b) System for tracking data on injuries among members of the Armed Forces in use of newest generation PPE.—
(c) Assessments of members of the Armed Forces of injuries incurred in connection with ill-fitting or malfunctioning PPE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Each health assessment specified in paragraph (2) that is undertaken after the date of the enactment of this Act shall include the following:
(a) Limitation, estimate, and certification.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 may be used by the Secretary of Defense to comply with the Order and Authorization adopted by the Federal Communications Commission on April 19, 2020 (FCC 20–48) until the Secretary—
(b) Covered costs.—For purposes of this section, covered costs include costs that would be incurred—
(2) to modify, repair, or replace equipment, spares, associated ancillary equipment, software, facilities, operating manuals, training, or compliance with regulations, including with regard to the underlying platform or system in which a capability of the Global Positioning System is embedded; and
(3) for personnel of the Department to engineer, validate, and verify that any required remediation provides the Department with the same operational capability for the affected system prior to terrestrial operation in the 1525 to 1559 megahertz or 1626.5 to 1660.5 megahertz bands of electromagnetic spectrum.
(a) Definitions.—In this section—
(1) the term “Assistant Secretary” means the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information;
(3) the term “Federal entity” has the meaning given the term in section 113(l) of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Organization Act (47 U.S.C. 923(l));
(b) Initial interagency spectrum information technology coordination.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the Policy and Plans Steering Group, shall identify a process to establish goals, including parameters to measure the achievement of those goals, for the modernization of the infrastructure of covered agencies relating to managing the use of Federal spectrum by those agencies, which shall include—
(1) the standardization of data inputs, modeling algorithms, modeling and simulation processes, analysis tools with respect to Federal spectrum, assumptions, and any other tool to ensure interoperability and functionality with respect to that infrastructure;
(2) other potential innovative technological capabilities with respect to that infrastructure, including cloud-based databases, artificial intelligence technologies, automation, and improved modeling and simulation capabilities;
(3) ways to improve the management of covered agencies’ use of Federal spectrum through that infrastructure, including by—
(4) ways to improve the ability of covered agencies to meet mission requirements in congested environments with respect to Federal spectrum, including as part of automated adjustments to operations based on changing conditions in those environments;
(c) Spectrum information technology modernization.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 240 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that contains the plan of the NTIA to modernize and automate the infrastructure of the NTIA relating to managing the use of Federal spectrum by covered agencies so as to more efficiently manage that use.
(2) CONTENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) an assessment of the current, as of the date on which the report is submitted, infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph;
(B) an acquisition strategy for the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph, including how that modernized infrastructure will enable covered agencies to be more efficient and effective in the use of Federal spectrum;
(D) plans detailing how the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph will—
(i) enhance the security and reliability of that infrastructure so that such infrastructure satisfies the requirements of subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code;
(ii) improve data models and analysis tools to increase the efficiency of the spectrum use described in that paragraph;
(E) an operations and maintenance plan with respect to the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA described in that paragraph;
(F) a strategy for coordination between the covered agencies within the Policy and Plans Steering Group, which shall include—
(G) identification of manually intensive processes involved in managing Federal spectrum and proposed enhancements to those processes;
(d) Interagency inputs.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the head of each covered agency shall submit to the Assistant Secretary and the Policy and Plans Steering Group a report that describes the plan of the agency to modernize the infrastructure of the agency with respect to the use of Federal spectrum by the agency so that such modernized infrastructure of the agency is interoperable with the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA, as described in subsection (c).
(2) CONTENTS.—Each report submitted by the head of a covered agency under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) include—
(i) an assessment of the current, as of the date on which the report is submitted, management capabilities of the agency with respect to the use of frequencies that are assigned to the agency, which shall include a description of any challenges faced by the agency with respect to that management;
(iii) a description of potential innovative technological capabilities for the management of frequencies that are assigned to the agency, as determined under subsection (b);
(iv) identification of agency-specific requirements or constraints relating to the infrastructure of the agency;
(v) identification of any existing, as of the date on which the report is submitted, systems of the agency that are duplicative of the modernized infrastructure of the NTIA, as proposed under subsection (c); and
(vi) with respect to the report submitted by the Secretary of Defense—
(I) a strategy for the integration of systems or the flow of data among the Armed Forces, the military departments, the Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities, and other components of the Department of Defense;
(II) a plan for the implementation of solutions to the use of Federal spectrum by the Department of Defense involving information at multiple levels of classification; and
(III) a strategy for addressing, within the modernized infrastructure of the Department of Defense described in that paragraph, the exchange of information between the Department of Defense and the NTIA in order to accomplish required processing of all Department of Defense domestic spectrum coordination and management activities; and
(e) GAO oversight.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall—
(1) not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, conduct a review of the infrastructure of covered agencies, as that infrastructure exists on the date of enactment of this Act;
(2) after all of the reports required under subsection (d) have been submitted, conduct oversight of the implementation of the modernization plans submitted by the NTIA and covered agencies under subsections (c) and (d), respectively;
(3) not later than 1 year after the date on which the Comptroller General begins conducting oversight under paragraph (2), and annually thereafter, submit a report regarding that oversight to—
(a) Findings.—The Senate makes the following findings:
(1) The last Sunday in September—
(2) There is no date dedicated to families affected by the loss of a loved one who died in service to the United States.
(3) A gold star symbolizes a family member who died in the line of duty while serving in the Armed Forces.
(4) The members and veterans of the Armed Forces, through their service, bear the burden of protecting the freedom of the people of the United States.
(b) Sense of the Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that the Senate—
(1) designates the week of September 20 through September 26, 2020, as “Gold Star Families Remembrance Week”;
(2) honors and recognizes the sacrifices made by—
(a) Requirement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall develop and maintain a plan to maintain and restore the economy of the United States in response to a significant event.
(3) CONTENTS.—The plan required under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) examine the distribution of goods and services across the United States necessary for the reliable functioning of the United States during a significant event;
(B) identify the economic functions of relevant actors, the disruption, corruption, or dysfunction of which would have a debilitating effect in the United States on—
(C) identify the critical distribution mechanisms for each economic sector that should be prioritized for operation during a significant event, including—
(ii) national and international financial systems, including wholesale payments, stocks, and currency exchanges;
(D) identify economic functions of relevant actors, the disruption, corruption, or dysfunction of which would cause—
(E) identify the economic functions of relevant actors that are so vital to the economy of the United States that the disruption, corruption, or dysfunction of those economic functions would undermine response, recovery, or mobilization efforts during a significant event;
(F) incorporate, to the greatest extent practicable, the principles and practices contained within Federal plans for the continuity of Government and continuity of operations;
(G) identify—
(H) identify critical economic sectors for which the preservation of data in a protected, verified, and uncorrupted status would be required for the quick recovery of the economy of the United States in the face of a significant disruption following a significant event;
(I) include a list of raw materials, industrial goods, and other items, the absence of which would significantly undermine the ability of the United States to sustain the functions described in subparagraphs (B), (D), and (E);
(J) provide an analysis of supply chain diversification for the items described in subparagraph (I) in the event of a disruption caused by a significant event;
(K) include—
(L) identify mechanisms in existence on the date of enactment of this Act and mechanisms that can be developed to ensure that the swift transport and delivery of the items described in subparagraph (I) is feasible in the event of a distribution network disturbance or degradation, including a distribution network disturbance or degradation caused by a significant event;
(M) include guidance for determining the prioritization for the distribution of the items described in subparagraph (I), including distribution to States and Indian Tribes;
(N) consider the advisability and feasibility of mechanisms for extending the credit of the United States or providing other financial support authorized by law to key participants in the economy of the United States if the extension or provision of other financial support—
(O) include guidance for determining categories of employees that should be prioritized to continue to work in order to sustain the functions described in subparagraphs (B), (D), and (E) in the event that there are limitations on the ability of individuals to travel to workplaces or to work remotely, including considerations for defense readiness;
(P) identify critical economic sectors necessary to provide material and operational support to the defense of the United States;
(Q) determine whether the Secretary of Homeland Security, the National Guard, and the Secretary of Defense have adequate authority to assist the United States in a recovery from a severe economic degradation caused by a significant event;
(b) Coordination.—In developing the plan required under subsection (a)(1), the President shall—
(2) consult with economic sectors relating to critical infrastructure through sector-coordinated councils, as appropriate;
(c) Submission to Congress.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than every 3 years thereafter, the President shall submit the plan required under subsection (a)(1) and the information described in paragraph (2) to—
(2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—The information described in this paragraph is—
(A) any change to Federal law that would be necessary to carry out the plan required under subsection (a)(1); and
Section 350 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–254; 49 U.S.C 44809 note) is amended
(1) in the section heading, by striking “at institutions of higher education” and inserting “for educational purposes”; and
(2) in subsection (a)—
(B) in paragraph (1), as added by subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(2) flown as part of the established curriculum of an elementary school or secondary school (as such terms are defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801));
Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
“(4) the Internet address of a summary of not more than 100 words in length of the proposed rule, in plain language, that shall be posted on the Internet website under section 206(d) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note) (commonly known as regulations.gov).”.
Section 1730C(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(b) Covered health care professionals.—For purposes of this section, a covered health care professional is any of the following individuals:
“(1) A health care professional who—
“(A) is an employee of the Department appointed under section 7306, 7401, 7405, 7406, or 7408 of this title or title 5;
“(C) is required to adhere to all standards for quality relating to the provision of health care in accordance with applicable policies of the Department; and
“(2) A postgraduate health care employee who—
“(A) is appointed under section 7401(1), 7401(3), or 7405 of this title or title 5 for any category of personnel described in paragraph (1) or (3) of section 7401 of this title;
(a) Definition.—In this section, the term “Confucius Institute” means a cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the Government of the People’s Republic of China.
(b) Restrictions on Confucius Institutes.—An institution of higher education or other postsecondary educational institution (referred to in this section as an “institution”) shall not be eligible to receive Federal funds from the Department of Education (except funds under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) or other Department of Education funds that are provided directly to students) unless the institution ensures that any contract or agreement between the institution and a Confucius Institute includes clear provisions that—
Section 1786 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking “The Secretary” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (c), the Secretary”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Exception based on medical necessity.—Pursuant to such regulations as the Secretary shall prescribe to carry out this section, the Secretary may furnish more than seven days of health care services described in subsection (b), and may furnish transportation necessary to receive such services, to a newborn child based on medical necessity if the child is in need of additional care, including if the child has been discharged or released from a hospital and requires readmittance to ensure the health and welfare of the child.”.
Section 1116(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
In this subtitle:
(2) 5G NETWORK.—The term “5G network” means a radio network as described by 3GPP Release 15 or higher.
(4) NTIA ADMINISTRATOR.—The term “NTIA Administrator” means the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information.
(5) OPEN-RAN.—The term “Open-RAN” means the Open Radio Access Network approach to standardization adopted by the O-RAN Alliance, Telecom Infra Project, or 3GPP, or any similar set of open standards for multi-vendor network equipment interoperability.
(a) Use of Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Fund.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall transfer from the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Fund established under section 309(j)(8)(E) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(8)(E))—
(b) Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the “Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund” (referred to in this subsection as the “R&D Fund”).
(2) USE OF FUND.—
(3) ADMINISTRATION OF FUND.—The NTIA Administrator, in consultation with the Commission, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, and the Director of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, shall establish criteria for grants awarded under this subsection, and administer the R&D Fund, to support research and the commercial application of that research, including in the following areas:
(A) Promoting the development of technology, including software, hardware, and microprocessing technology, that will enhance competitiveness in the fifth-generation (commonly known as “5G”) and successor wireless technology supply chains.
(B) Accelerating development and deployment of open interface standards-based compatible, interoperable equipment, such as equipment developed pursuant to the standards set forth by organizations such as the O-RAN Alliance, the Telecom Infra Project, 3GPP, the Open-RAN Software Community, or any successor organizations.
(C) Promoting compatibility of new 5G equipment with future open standards-based, interoperable equipment.
(E) Objective criteria to define equipment as compliant with open standards for multi-vendor network equipment interoperability.
(4) NONDUPLICATION OF RESEARCH.—To the greatest extent practicable, the NTIA Administrator shall ensure that any research funded by a grant awarded under this subsection avoids duplication of other Federal or private sector research.
(5) TIMING.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the NTIA Administrator shall begin awarding grants under this subsection.
(6) FEDERAL ADVISORY BODY.—
(A) ESTABLISHMENT.—The NTIA Administrator shall establish a Federal advisory committee, in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), composed of government and private sector experts, to advise the NTIA Administrator on the administration of the R&D Fund.
(B) COMPOSITION.—The advisory committee established under subparagraph (A) shall be composed of—
(7) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—
(A) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the NTIA Administrator shall submit to the relevant committees of Congress a report with—
(c) Multilateral Telecommunications Security Fund.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF FUND.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund to be known as the “Multilateral Telecommunications Security Fund”.
(B) USE OF FUND.—Amounts deposited in the Multilateral Telecommunications Security Fund shall be available to the Secretary of State to make expenditures under this subsection in such amounts as the Secretary of State determines appropriate.
(2) ADMINISTRATION OF FUND.—The Secretary of State, in consultation with the NTIA Administrator, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Commission, shall establish a common funding mechanism, in coordination with foreign partners, that uses amounts from the Multilateral Telecommunications Security Fund to support the development and adoption of secure and trusted telecommunications technologies.
(3) ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for each fiscal year during which amounts in the Multilateral Telecommunications Security Fund are available, the Secretary of State shall submit to the relevant committees of Congress a report on the status and progress of the funding mechanism established under paragraph (2), including—
(a) In general.—The Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, and the Chairman of the Commission, or their designees, shall consider how to enhance representation of the United States at international forums that set standards for 5G networks and for future generations of wireless communications networks, including—
(a) Definitions.—In this section—
(1) the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(A) the Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and
(B) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Financial Services, and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives;
(2) the term “covered entity” means a private entity, a consortium of private entities, or a consortium of public and private entities with a demonstrated ability to construct, expand, or modernize a facility relating to the fabrication, assembly, testing, advanced packaging, or advanced research and development of semiconductors;
(3) the term “covered incentive”—
(A) means an incentive offered by a governmental entity to a covered entity for the purposes of constructing within the jurisdiction of the governmental entity, or expanding or modernizing an existing facility within that jurisdiction, a facility described in paragraph (2); and
(B) includes any tax incentive (such as an incentive or reduction with respect to employment or payroll taxes or a tax abatement with respect to personal or real property), a workforce-related incentive (including a grant agreement relating to workforce training or vocational education), any concession with respect to real property, funding for research and development with respect to semiconductors, and any other incentive determined appropriate by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State;
(b) Grant program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish in the Department of Commerce a program that, in accordance with the requirements of this section, provides grants to covered entities.
(2) PROCEDURE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—A covered entity shall submit to the Secretary an application that describes the project for which the covered entity is seeking a grant under this section.
(B) ELIGIBILITY.—In order for a covered entity to qualify for a grant under this section, the covered entity shall demonstrate to the Secretary, in the application submitted by the covered entity under subparagraph (A), that—
(i) the covered entity has a documented interest in constructing, expanding, or modernizing a facility described in subsection (a)(2); and
(C) CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEW.—With respect to the review by the Secretary of an application submitted by a covered entity under subparagraph (A)—
(3) AMOUNT.—The amount of a grant made by the Secretary to a covered entity under this subsection shall be in an amount that is not more than $3,000,000,000.
(4) USE OF FUNDS.—A covered entity that receives a grant under this subsection may only use the grant amounts to—
(A) finance the construction, expansion, or modernization of a facility described in subsection (a)(2), as documented in the application submitted by the covered entity under paragraph (2)(A), or for similar uses in state of practice and legacy facilities, as determined necessary by the Secretary for purposes relating to the national security and economic competitiveness of the United States;
(5) CLAWBACK.—The Secretary shall recover the full amount of a grant provided to a covered entity under this subsection if—
(A) as of the date that is 5 years after the date on which the Secretary makes the grant, the project to which the grant relates has not been completed, except that the Secretary may issue a waiver with respect to the requirement under this subparagraph if the Secretary determines that issuing such a waiver is appropriate and in the interests of the United States; or
(B) during the applicable term with respect to the grant, the covered entity engages in any joint research or technology licensing effort—
(c) Consultation and coordination required.—In carrying out the program established under subsection (b), the Secretary shall consult and coordinate with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense.
(d) GAO reviews.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall—
(1) not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and biennially thereafter until the date that is 10 years after that date of enactment, conduct a review of the program established under subsection (b), which shall include, at a minimum—
(A) a determination of the number of instances in which grants were provided under that subsection during the period covered by the review in violation of a requirement of this section;
(B) an evaluation of how—
(a) Department of Defense efforts.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, work with the private sector through a public-private partnership, including by incentivizing the formation of a consortium of United States companies, to ensure the development and production of advanced, measurably secure microelectronics for use by the Department of Defense, the intelligence community, critical infrastructure sectors, and other national security applications. Such work may include providing incentives for the creation, expansion, or modernization of one or more commercially competitive and sustainable microelectronics manufacturing or advanced research and development facilities.
(2) RISK MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS.—A participant in a consortium formed with incentives under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) have the potential to perform fabrication, assembly, package, or test functions for microelectronics deemed critical to national security as defined by export control regulatory agencies in consultation with the National Security Adviser and the Secretary of Defense;
(C) be able to produce microelectronics consistent with applicable measurably secure supply chain and operational security standards established under section 224(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
(3) NATIONAL SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS.—The Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall select participants for the consortium formed with incentives under paragraph (1). In selecting such participants, the Secretary and the Director may jointly consider whether the United States companies—
(A) have participated in previous programs and projects of the Department of Defense, Department of Energy, or the intelligence community, including—
(B) have demonstrated an ongoing commitment to performing contracts for the Department of Defense and the intelligence community;
(C) are approved by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency or the Office of the Director of National Intelligence as presenting an acceptable security risk, taking into account supply chain assurance vulnerabilities, counterintelligence risks, and any risks presented by companies whose owners are located outside the United States; and
(4) NONTRADITIONAL DEFENSE CONTRACTORS AND COMMERCIAL ENTITIES.—Arrangements entered into to carry out paragraph (1) shall be in such form as the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate to encourage industry participation of nontraditional defense contractors or commercial entities and may include a contract, a grant, a cooperative agreement, a commercial agreement, the use of other transaction authority under section 2371 of title 10, United States Code, or another such arrangement.
(5) DISCHARGE.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out paragraph (1) jointly through the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, or such other component of the Department of Defense as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(6) OTHER INITIATIVES.—The Secretary of Defense shall dedicate initiatives within the Department of Defense to advance radio frequency, mixed signal, radiation tolerant, and radiation hardened microelectronics that support national security and dual-use applications.
(7) REPORTS.—
(A) REPORT BY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the plans of the Secretary to carry out paragraph (1).
(B) BIENNIAL REPORTS BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.—Not later than 1 year after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required by subparagraph (A) and not less frequently than once every 2 years thereafter for a period of 10 years, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the activities carried out under this subsection.
(b) Defense Production Act of 1950 efforts.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to Congress a report on a plan for use by the Department of Defense of authorities available in title III of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4531 et seq.) to establish and enhance a domestic production capability for microelectronics technologies and related technologies, subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose.
(a) In general.—Commencing not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, shall undertake a review, which shall include a survey, using authorities in section 705 of the Defense Production Act (50 U.S.C. 4555), to assess the capabilities of the United States industrial base to support the national defense in light of the global nature of the supply chain and significant interdependencies between the United States industrial base and the industrial base of foreign countries with respect to the manufacture, design, and end use of microelectronics.
(b) Response to survey.—The Secretary shall ensure compliance with the survey from among all relevant potential respondents, including the following:
(1) Corporations, partnerships, associations, or any other organized groups domiciled and with substantial operations in the United States.
(2) Corporations, partnerships, associations, or any other organized groups domiciled in the United States with operations outside the United States.
(c) Information requested.—The information sought from a responding entity pursuant to the survey required by subsection (a) shall include, at minimum, information on the following with respect to the manufacture. design, or end use of microelectronics by such entity:
(3) An identification of types of microelectronics development, manufacture, assembly, test, and packaging equipment in operation at such entity.
(4) An identification of all relevant intellectual property, raw materials, and semi-finished goods and components sourced domestically and abroad by such entity.
(5) Specifications of the microelectronics manufactured or designed by such entity, descriptions of the end-uses of such microelectronics, and a description of any technical support provided to end-users of such microelectronics by such entity.
(8) A list of all foreign and domestic subsidies, and any other financial incentives, received by such entity in each market in which such entity operates.
(9) A list of information requests from the People’s Republic of China to such entity, and a description of the nature of each request and the type of information provided.
(d) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the heads of other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, submit to Congress a report on the results of the review required by subsection (a). The report shall include the following:
(a) Multilateral Microelectronics Security Fund.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF FUND.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a trust fund, to be known as the “Multilateral Microelectronics Security Fund” (in this section referred to as the “Fund”), consisting of such amounts as may be appropriated to such Fund and any amounts that may be credited to the Fund under paragraph (2).
(2) INVESTMENT OF AMOUNTS.—
(3) USE OF FUND.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), amounts in the Fund shall be available, as provided in advance in an appropriations Act, to the Secretary of State—
(B) AVAILABILITY CONTINGENT ON INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT.—Amounts in the Fund shall be available to the Secretary of State on and after the date on which the Secretary enters into an agreement with the governments of countries that are partners of the United States to participate in the common funding mechanism under paragraph (1) of subsection (b) and the commitments described in paragraph (2) of that subsection.
(b) Common funding mechanism for development and adoption of measurably secure microelectronics and measurably secure microelectronics supply chains.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall seek to establish a common funding mechanism, in coordination with the governments of countries that are partners of the United States, that uses amounts from the Fund, and amounts committed by such governments, to support the development and adoption of secure microelectronics and secure microelectronics supply chains, including for use in research and development collaborations among countries participating in the common funding mechanism.
(2) MUTUAL COMMITMENTS.—The Secretary of State, in consultation with the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Commerce, shall seek to negotiate a set of mutual commitments with the governments of countries that are partners of the United States upon which to condition any expenditure of funds pursuant to the common funding mechanism described in paragraph (1). Such commitments shall, at a minimum—
(A) establish transparency requirements for any subsidies or other financial benefits (including revenue foregone) provided to microelectronics firms located in or outside such countries;
(C) promote harmonized treatment of microelectronics and verification processes for items being exported to a country considered a national security risk by a country participating in the common funding mechanism;
(D) establish consistent policies and common external policies to address nonmarket economies as the behavior of such countries pertains to microelectronics;
(c) Annual report to congress.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for each fiscal year during which amounts in the Fund are available under subsection (a)(4), the Secretary of State shall submit to Congress a report on the status of the implementation of this section that includes a description of—
(1) any commitments made by the governments of countries that are partners of the United States to providing funding for the common funding mechanism described in subsection (b)(1) and the specific amount so committed;
(a) Appropriate committees of Congress.— In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(1) the Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and
(2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee on Financial Services, and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the leadership of the United States in semiconductor technology and innovation is critical to the economic growth and national security of the United States.
(c) Subcommittee on semiconductor leadership.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT REQUIRED.—The President shall establish in the National Science and Technology Council a subcommittee on matters relating to leadership of the United States in semiconductor technology and innovation.
(2) DUTIES.—The duties of the subcommittee established under paragraph (1) are as follows:
(A) NATIONAL STRATEGY ON SEMICONDUCTOR RESEARCH.—
(i) DEVELOPMENT.—In coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the National Science Foundation, and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and in consultation with the semiconductor industry and academia, develop a national strategy on semiconductor research, development, manufacturing, and supply chain security, including guidance for the funding of research, and strengthening of the domestic microelectronics workforce.
(ii) REPORTING AND UPDATES.—Not less frequently than once every 5 years, to update the strategy developed under clause (i) and to submit the revised strategy to the appropriate committees of Congress.
(iii) IMPLEMENTATION.—In coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the National Science Foundation, and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, on an annual basis coordinate and recommend each agency’s semiconductor related research and development programs and budgets to ensure consistency with the National Semiconductor Strategy.
(d) Industrial Advisory Committee.—The President shall establish a standing subcommittee of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology to advise the United States Government on matters relating to microelectronics policy.
(e) National Semiconductor Technology Center.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Commerce shall establish a national semiconductor technology center to conduct research and prototyping of advanced semiconductor technology to strengthen the economic competitiveness and security of the domestic supply chain, which will be operated as a public private-sector consortium with participation from the private sector, the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, the Department of Homeland Security, the National Science Foundation, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology
(2) FUNCTIONS.—The functions of the center established under paragraph (1) shall be as follows:
(A) To conduct advanced semiconductor manufacturing, design research and prototyping that strengthens the entire domestic ecosystem and is aligned with the National Strategy on Semiconductor Research.
(B) To establish a National Advanced Packaging Manufacturing Program led by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in coordination with the Center, to strengthen semiconductor advanced test, assembly, and packaging capability in the domestic ecosystem, and which shall coordinate with the Manufacturing USA institute established under paragraph (4).
(C) To establish an investment fund, in partnership with the private sector, to support startups in the domestic semiconductor ecosystem.
(D) To establish a Semiconductor Manufacturing Program through the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to enable advances and breakthroughs in measurement science, standards, material characterization, instrumentation, testing, and manufacturing capabilities that will accelerate the underlying research and development for metrology of next generation semiconductors and ensure the competitiveness and leadership of the United States within this sector.
(3) COMPONENTS.—The fund established under paragraph (2)(C) shall cover the following:
(4) CREATION OF A MANUFACTURING USA INSTITUTE.—The fund established under paragraph (2)(C) may also cover the creation of a Manufacturing USA institute described in section 34(d) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278s(d)) that is focused on semiconductor manufacturing. Such institute may emphasize the following:
(f) Domestic production requirements.—The head of any executive agency receiving funding under this section shall develop policies to require domestic production, to the extent possible, for any intellectual property resulting from microelectronics research and development conducted as a result of these funds and domestic control requirements to protect any such intellectual property from foreign adversaries.
None of the funds appropriated pursuant to an authorization in this subtitle may be provided to an entity—
(a) In general.—Subchapter I of chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1701a the following new section:
Ҥ 1701b. Enhanced pay authority for certain acquisition and technology positions
“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program using the pay authority specified in subsection (d) to fix the rate of basic pay for positions described in subsection (c) in order to assist the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the military departments in attracting and retaining high-quality acquisition and technology experts in positions responsible for managing and developing complex, high-cost, technological acquisition efforts of the Department of Defense.
“(b) Approval required.—The program may be carried out only with approval as follows:
“(c) Positions.—The positions described in this subsection are positions that—
“(d) Rate of basic pay.—The pay authority specified in this subsection is authority as follows:
“(1) Authority to fix the rate of basic pay for a position at a rate not to exceed 150 percent of the rate of basic pay payable for level I of the Executive Schedule, upon the approval of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment or the service acquisition executive concerned, as applicable.
“(e) Limitations.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority in subsection (a) may be used only to the extent necessary to competitively recruit or retain individuals exceptionally well qualified for positions described in subsection (c).
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 87 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1701a the following new item:
“1701b. Enhanced pay authority for certain acquisition and technology positions.”.
(c) Repeal of pilot program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is repealed.
(a) In general.—Chapter 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2358b the following new section:
Ҥ 2358c. Enhanced pay authority for certain research and technology positions in science and technology reinvention laboratories
“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program using the pay authority specified in subsection (d) to fix the rate of basic pay for positions described in subsection (c) in order to assist the military departments in attracting and retaining high quality acquisition and technology experts in positions responsible for managing and performing complex, high-cost research and technology development efforts in the science and technology reinvention laboratories of the Department of Defense.
“(b) Approval Required.—The program may be carried out in a military department only with the approval of the service acquisition executive of the military department concerned.
“(c) Positions.—The positions described in this subsection are positions in the science and technology reinvention laboratories of the Department of Defense that—
“(d) Rate of Basic Pay.—The pay authority specified in this subsection is authority as follows:
“(e) Limitations.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority in subsection (a) may be used only to the extent necessary to competitively recruit or retain individuals exceptionally well qualified for positions described in subsection (c).
“(f) Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories of the Department of Defense Defined.—In this section, the term ‘science and technology reinvention laboratories of the Department of Defense’ means the laboratories designated as science and technology reinvention laboratories by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note).”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2358b the following new item:
“2358c. Enhanced pay authority for certain research and technology positions in science and technology reinvention laboratories.”.
(c) Repeal of pilot program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1124 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2456; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is repealed.
Section 1599c(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2020” both places it appears and inserting “December 31, 2025”.
Section 5542(a)(6)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2021” and inserting “September 30, 2023”.
Section 9905(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(11) Any position in the military housing office of a military installation whose primary function is supervision of military housing covered by subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10.”.
Section 1109(e) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2010; 5 U.S.C. 3393 note) is amended by striking “on the date” and all that follows and inserting “on August 13, 2023.”
(a) Pilot program authorized.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of using the pay authority specified in subsection (d) to fix the rate of basic pay for positions described in subsection (c) in order to assist the Department of Defense in attracting and retaining personnel with significant experience in high-level management of complex organizations and enterprise functions in order to lead implementation by the Department of the National Defense Strategy.
(b) Approval required.—The pilot program may be carried out only with approval as follows:
(1) Approval of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, in the case of a position not under the authority, direction, and control of an Under Secretary of Defense and not under the authority, direction, and control of the Under Secretary of a military department.
(c) Positions.—The positions described in this subsection are positions that require expertise of an extremely high level in innovative leadership and management of enterprise-wide business operations, including financial management, health care, supply chain and logistics, information technology, real property stewardship, and human resources, across a large and complex organization.
(d) Rate of basic pay.—The pay authority specified in this subsection is authority as follows:
(e) Limitations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority in subsection (a) may be used only to the extent necessary to competitively recruit or retain individuals exceptionally well qualified for positions described in subsection (c).
(2) NUMBER OF POSITIONS.—The authority in subsection (a) may not be used with respect to—
(3) TERM OF POSITIONS.—The authority in subsection (a) may be used only for positions having terms less than five years.
(4) PAST SERVICE.—An individual may not be appointed to a position pursuant to the authority provided by subsection (a) if the individual separated or retired from Federal civil service or service as a commissioned officer of an Armed Force on a date that is less than five years before the date of such appointment of the individual.
(a) Pilot program required.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of expanding the use of the authority in section 3326 of title 5, United States Code, to appoint retired members of the Armed Forces described in subsection (b) of that section to positions in the Department of Defense described in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) Positions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The positions in the Department described in this subsection are positions classified at or below GS–13 under the General Schedule under subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, or an equivalent level under another wage system, in the competitive service—
(2) LIMITATION ON DELEGATION OF CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary of a military department may not delegate the authority to make a certification described in paragraph (1)(B) to an individual in a grade lower than colonel, captain in the Navy, or an equivalent grade in the Space Force, or an individual with an equivalent civilian grade.
(d) Report.—Not later than two years after the commencement of the pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program. The report shall include the following:
(a) In general.—Chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 1599i. Direct hire authority and relocation incentives for positions at remote locations
“(a) Direct hire authority.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may appoint, without regard to any provision of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, qualified applicants to positions in the competitive service to fill vacancies at covered locations.
“(b) Relocation incentives.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—An individual appointed to a position pursuant to subsection (a) may be paid a relocation incentive in connection with the relocation of the individual to the location of the position.
“(2) AMOUNT.—The amount of a relocation incentive payable to an individual under this subsection may not exceed the amount equal to—
“(3) SERVICE AGREEMENT.—To receive a relocation incentive under this subsection, an individual appointed to a position under subsection (a) shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary of Defense to complete a period of service at the covered location. The period of obligated service of the individual at such location under the agreement may not exceed four years. The agreement shall include such repayment or alternative employment obligations as the Secretary considers appropriate for failure of the individual to complete the period of obligated service specified in the agreement.
(b) Outcome measurements.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the effect of the authority provided under subsection (a) of section 1599i of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), and any relocation incentives provided under subsection (b) of such section.
(c) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the effect of the authority provided under subsection (a) of section 1599i of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), and any relocation incentives provided under subsection (b) of such section.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description and assessment of the effectiveness and achievements of the authority and relocation incentives described in paragraph (1), including—
(B) A comparison of the effectiveness and use of the authority and relocation incentives described in paragraph (1) to authorities under title 5, United States Code, used by the Department of Defense before the date of the enactment of this Act to support hiring at remote or rural locations.
(d) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“1599i. Direct hire authority and relocation incentives for positions at remote locations.”.
Section 9905(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “including” and all that follows and inserting the following: “including—
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, shall establish and carry out, for a period of not less than five years, a Fire Fighters Alternative Work Schedule demonstration project for the Navy Region Mid-Atlantic Fire and Emergency Services. Such demonstration project shall provide, with respect to each employee of the Navy Region Mid-Atlantic Fire and Emergency Services, that—
(2) tours of duty are scheduled using a regularly recurring pattern of 48-hour shifts followed by 48 or 72 consecutive non-work hours, as determined by mutual agreement between the Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, and the exclusive employee representative at each Navy Region Mid-Atlantic installation, in such a manner that each employee is regularly scheduled for 144-hours in any two-week period;
(3) for any such employee that is a fire fighter working an alternative work schedule, such employee shall earn overtime compensation in a manner consistent with other applicable law and regulation;
(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the demonstration project under this section terminates, the Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report detailing—
(a) In general.—Not later than 1 year after enactment of this act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on issues related to diversity and inclusion within the civilian workforce of the Department of Defense.
Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and as most recently amended by section 1104 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “2021” and inserting “2022”.
Subsection (a) of section 1101 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “through 2020” and inserting “through 2021”.
(a) In general.—Section 5724b(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2018, immediately after the coming into effect of the amendments made by subsection (a) of section 1114 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), as provided for in subsection (c) of such section 1114.
Section 333(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
Section 333(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1201, is further amended—
Section 350(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “that are” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “that are—
“(3) (A) within the United States Africa Command area of responsibility; and
“(B) eligible for assistance under chapter 5 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2347 et seq.).”.
Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1639), as most recently amended by section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “$10,000,000” and inserting “$15,000,000”.
(a) Funds available for support.—Subsection (b) of section 1226 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended to read as follows:
(a) In general.—Section 344 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the section heading, by striking “multinational military centers of excellence” and inserting “multinational centers of excellence”;
(2) by striking “multinational military center of excellence” each place it appears and inserting “multinational center of excellence”;
(3) by striking “multinational military centers of excellence” each place it appears and inserting “multinational centers of excellence”;
(4) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting “or entered into by the Secretary of State,” after “Secretary of State,”;
(5) in subsection (e)—
(A) in the subsection heading, by striking “Multinational military center of excellence ” and inserting “Multinational center of excellence”;
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and moving the subparagraphs two ems to the right;
(C) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by striking “means an entity” and inserting “means—
(a) In general.—During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on September 30, 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall undertake activities consistent with the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (Public Law 115–68; 131 Stat. 1202) and with the guidance specified in this section, including—
(1) establishing Department of Defense-wide policies and programs that advance the implementation of that Act, including military doctrine and Department-specific and combatant command-specific programs;
(2) ensuring the Department sufficient personnel to serve as gender advisors, including by hiring and training full-time equivalent personnel, as necessary, and establishing roles, responsibilities, and requirements for gender advisors;
(3) the deliberate integration of gender analysis into relevant training for members of the Armed Forces across ranks, as described in the Women's Entrepreneurship and Economic Empowerment Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–428; 132 Stat. 5509); and
(4) security cooperation activities that further the implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (Public Law 115–68; 131 Stat. 1202).
(b) Building partner defense institution and security force capacity.—
(1) INCORPORATION OF GENDER ANALYSIS AND PARTICIPATION OF WOMEN INTO SECURITY COOPERATION ACTIVITIES.—Consistent with the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (Public Law 115–68; 131 Stat. 1202), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall seek to incorporate gender analysis and participation by women, as appropriate, into the institutional and national security force capacity-building activities of security cooperation programs carried out under title 10, United States Code, including by—
(A) incorporating gender analysis and women, peace, and security priorities, including sex-disaggregated data, into educational and training materials and programs authorized by section 333 of title 10, United States Code;
(B) advising on the recruitment, employment, development, retention, and promotion of women in such national security forces, including by—
(2) BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES.—Partner country assessments conducted in the course of Department security cooperation activities to build the capacity of the national security forces of foreign countries shall include attention to the barriers and opportunities with respect to strengthening recruitment, employment, development, retention, and promotion of women in the military forces of such partner countries.
(c) Department-wide policies on women, peace, and security.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall initiate a process to establish standardized policies described in subsection (a)(1).
(d) Funding.—The Secretary of Defense may use funds authorized to be appropriated in each fiscal year to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance as specified in the table in section 4301 for carrying out the full implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (Public Law 115–68; 131 Stat. 1202) and the guidance on the matters described in paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (a) and subparagraphs (A) through (E) of subsection (b)(1).
(e) Annual report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the steps the Department has taken to implement the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (Public Law 115–68; 131 Stat. 1202), including—
(a) Plan required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to establish a Department of Defense Regional Center for Security Studies for the Arctic.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of the benefits of establishing such a center, including the manner in which the establishment of such a center would benefit United States and Department interests in the Arctic region.
(B) A description of the mission and purpose of such a center, including specific policy guidance from the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(D) An assessment of suitable locations for such a center that are—
(i) in proximity to other academic institutions that study security implications with respect to the Arctic region;
(F) An evaluation of the existing infrastructure, resources, and personnel available at military installations and at universities and other academic institutions that could reduce the costs described in accordance with subparagraph (E).
(G) An examination of partnership opportunities with United States allies and partners for potential collaboration and burden sharing.
(b) Establishment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not earlier than 30 days after the submittal of the plan required by subsection (a), and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of Defense may establish and administer a Department of Defense Regional Center for Security Studies for the Arctic, to be known as the “Ted Stevens Center for Arctic Security Studies”, for the purpose described in section 342(a) of title 10, United States Code.
(2) LOCATION.—The Ted Stevens Center for Arctic Security Studies may be located—
(A) in proximity to other academic institutions that study security implications with respect to the Arctic region;
(a) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that assesses the merits and feasibility of establishing and administering a Department of Defense Functional Center for Security Studies in Irregular Warfare.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of the benefits to the United States, and the allies and partners of the United States, of establishing such a functional center, including the manner in which the establishment of such a functional center would enhance and sustain focus on, and advance knowledge and understanding of, matters of irregular warfare, including cybersecurity, nonstate actors, information operations, counterterrorism, stability operations, and the hybridization of such matters.
(B) A detailed description of the mission and purpose of such a functional center, including applicable policy guidance from the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(C) An analysis of appropriate reporting and liaison relationships between such a functional center and—
(D) An enumeration and valuation of criteria applicable to the determination of a suitable location for such a functional center.
(E) A description of the establishment and operational costs of such a functional center, including for—
(F) An evaluation of the existing infrastructure, resources, and personnel available at military installations and at universities and other academic and research institutions that could reduce the costs described in subparagraph (E).
(G) An examination of partnership opportunities with United States allies and partners for potential collaboration and burden sharing.
(b) Establishment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not earlier than 30 days after the submittal of the report required by subsection (a), and subject to the availability of appropriated funds, the Secretary of Defense may establish and administer a Department of Defense Functional Center for Security Studies in Irregular Warfare.
(2) TREATMENT AS A REGIONAL CENTER FOR SECURITY STUDIES.—A Department of Defense Functional Center for Security Studies in Irregular Warfare established under paragraph (1) shall be operated and administered in the same manner as the Department of Defense Regional Centers for Security Studies under section 342 of title 10, United States Code, and in accordance with such regulations as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe.
(3) LIMITATION.—No other institution or element of the Department may be designated as a Department of Defense functional center, except by an Act of Congress.
(4) LOCATION.—The location of a Department of Defense Functional Center for Security Studies in Irregular Warfare established under paragraph (1) shall be selected based on an objective, criteria-driven administrative or competitive award process, in accordance with which the merits of locating such functional center in Tempe, Arizona, may be evaluated together with other suitable locations.
(b) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The political, economic, and social benefits of the internet are important to advancing democracy and freedom throughout the world.
(2) Authoritarian governments are investing billions of dollars each year to create, maintain, and expand repressive internet censorship and surveillance systems to limit free association, control access to information, and prevent citizens from exercising their rights to free speech.
(c) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that it is in the interest of the United States—
(1) to promote global internet freedom by countering internet censorship and repressive surveillance;
(d) Establishment of the Open Technology Fund.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 309 the following:
“SEC. 309A. Open Technology Fund.
“(a) Authority.—
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established a grantee entity, to be known as the ‘Open Technology Fund’, which shall carry out this section.
“(2) IN GENERAL.—Grants authorized under section 305 shall be available to award annual grants to the Open Technology fund for the purpose of—
“(A) promoting, consistent with United States law, unrestricted access to uncensored sources of information via the internet; and
“(B) enabling journalists, including journalists employed by or affiliated with the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, or any entity funded by or partnering with the United States Agency for Global Media to create and disseminate news and information consistent with the purposes, standards, and principles specified in sections 302 and 303.
“(b) Use of grant funds.—The Open Technology Fund shall use grant funds received pursuant to subsection (a)(2)—
“(1) to advance freedom of the press and unrestricted access to the internet in repressive environments overseas through technology development, rather than through media messaging;
“(2) to research, develop, implement, and maintain—
“(A) technologies that circumvent techniques used by authoritarian governments, nonstate actors, and others to block or censor access to the internet, including circumvention tools that bypass internet blocking, filtering, and other censorship techniques used to limit or block legitimate access to content and information; and
“(3) to advance internet freedom by supporting private and public sector research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet to counter attempts by authoritarian governments, nonstate actors, and others to improperly restrict freedom online;
“(4) to research and analyze emerging technical threats and develop innovative solutions through collaboration with the private and public sectors to maintain the technological advantage of the United States Government over authoritarian governments, nonstate actors, and others;
“(5) to develop, acquire, and distribute requisite internet freedom technologies and techniques for the United States Agency for Global Media, in accordance with paragraph (2), and digital security interventions, to fully enable the creation and distribution of digital content between and to all users and regional audiences;
“(6) to prioritize programs for countries, the governments of which restrict freedom of expression on the internet, that are important to the national interest of the United States in accordance with section 7050(b)(2)(C) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2020 (division G of Public Law 116–94); and
“(c) Methodology.—In carrying out subsection (b), the Open Technology Fund shall—
“(1) (A) support fully open-source tools, code, and components, to the extent practicable, to ensure such supported tools and technologies are as secure, transparent, and accessible as possible; and
“(2) support technologies that undergo comprehensive security audits to ensure that such technologies are secure and have not been compromised in a manner detrimental to the interests of the United States or to individuals or organizations benefitting from programs supported by the Open Technology Fund;
“(3) review and periodically update, as necessary, security auditing procedures used by the Open Technology Fund to reflect current industry security standards;
“(5) solicit project proposals through an open, transparent, and competitive application process to attract innovative applications and reduce barriers to entry;
“(6) (A) seek input from technical, regional, and subject matter experts from a wide range of relevant disciplines; and
“(7) implement an independent review process, through which proposals are reviewed by such experts to ensure the highest degree of technical review and due diligence;
“(d) Grant agreement.—Any grant agreement with, or grants made to, the Open Technology Fund under this section shall be subject to the following limitations and restrictions:
“(1) The headquarters of the Open Technology Fund and its senior administrative and managerial staff shall be located in a location which ensures economy, operational effectiveness, and accountability to the United States Agency for Global Media.
“(3) Each grant agreement under this section shall require that each contract entered into by the Open Technology Fund specify that all obligations are assumed by the grantee and not by the United States Government.
“(4) Each grant agreement under this section shall require that any lease agreements entered into by the Open Technology Fund shall be, to the maximum extent possible, assignable to the United States Government.
“(e) Relationship to the United States Agency for Global Media.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Open Technology Fund shall be subject to the oversight and governance by the United States Agency for Global Media in accordance with section 305.
“(2) ASSISTANCE.—The United States Agency for Global Media, its broadcast entities, and the Open Technology Fund should render such assistance to each other as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this section or any other provision under this Act.
“(3) NOT A FEDERAL AGENCY OR INSTRUMENTALITY.—Nothing in this section may be construed to make the Open Technology Fund an agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government.
“(4) DETAILEES.—Employees of a grantee of the United States Agency for Global Media may be detailed to the Agency, in accordance with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.) and Federal employees may be detailed to a grantee of the United States Agency for Global Media, in accordance with such Act.
“(f) Relationship to other United States Government-funded internet freedom programs.—The United States Agency for Global Media shall ensure that internet freedom research and development projects of the Open Technology Fund are deconflicted with internet freedom programs of the Department of State and other relevant United States Government departments. Agencies should still share information and best practices relating to the implementation of subsections (b) and (c).
“(g) Reporting requirements.—
“(1) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Open Technology Fund shall highlight, in its annual report, internet freedom activities, including a comprehensive assessment of the Open Technology Fund’s activities relating to the implementation of subsections (b) and (c), which shall include—
“(2) ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE OPEN TECHNOLOGY FUND.—Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this section, the Inspector General of the Department of State and the Foreign Service shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that indicates—
“(h) Audit authorities.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Financial transactions of the Open Technology Fund that relate to functions carried out under this section may be audited by the Government Accountability Office in accordance with such principles and procedures and under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Comptroller General of the United States. Any such audit shall be conducted at the place or places at which accounts of the Open Technology Fund are normally kept.
“(2) ACCESS BY GAO.—The Government Accountability Office shall have access to all books, accounts, records, reports, files, papers, and property belonging to or in use by the Open Technology Fund pertaining to financial transactions as may be necessary to facilitate an audit. The Government Accountability Office shall be afforded full facilities for verifying transactions with any assets held by depositories, fiscal agents, and custodians. All such books, accounts, records, reports, files, papers, and property of the Open Technology Fund shall remain in the possession and custody of the Open Technology Fund.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 is amended—
(A) in section 304(d) (22 U.S.C. 6203(d)), by inserting “the Open Technology Fund,” before “the Middle East Broadcasting Networks”;
(B) in sections 305(a)(20) and 310(c) (22 U.S.C. 6204(a)(20) and 6209(c)), by inserting “the Open Technology Fund,” before “or the Middle East Broadcasting Networks” each place such term appears; and
(C) in section 310 (22 U.S.C. 6209), by inserting “the Open Technology Fund,” before “and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks” each place such term appears.
(e) United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.— Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking “October 1, 2020” and inserting “October 1, 2025”.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1217 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by striking “beginning on October 1, 2019, and ending on December 31, 2020” and inserting “beginning on October 1, 2020, and ending on December 31, 2021”.
Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1208(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended—
(2) in subsection (b), by striking the subsection designation and heading and all that follows through the period at the end of paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
“(b) Quarterly reports.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning in fiscal year 2021, not later than 45 days after the end of each quarter fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding the source of funds and the allocation and use of funds during that quarter fiscal year that were made available pursuant to the authority provided in this section or under any other provision of law for the purposes of the program under subsection (a).”; and
(a) Modification of authority To provide covered support.—Subsection (a) of section 1218 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(1) by striking the subsection designation and heading and all that follows through “The Secretary of Defense” and inserting the following:
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense by this Act may not be obligated or expended to provide covered support until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress the report required by subsection (b).”.
(b) Participation in reconciliation activities.—Such section is further amended—
(c) Extension.—Subsection (k) of such section, as so redesignated, is amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
(d) Exclusions from covered support.—Such section is further amended in paragraph (2)(B) of subsection (l), as so redesignated—
(1) in clause (ii), by inserting “, reimbursement for travel or lodging, and stipends or per diem payments” before the period at the end; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
“(iii) Any activity involving one or more members of an organization designated as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189) or an individual designated as a specially designated global terrorist pursuant to Executive Order 13224 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to blocking property and prohibiting transactions with persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism).”.
It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) the special immigrant visa program for Afghan allies is critical to the mission in Afghanistan and the long-term interests of the United States;
(2) maintaining a robust special immigrant visa program for Afghan allies is necessary to support United States Government personnel in Afghanistan who need translation, interpretation, security, and other services;
(3) Afghan allies routinely risk their lives to assist United States military and diplomatic personnel;
(4) honoring the commitments made to Afghan allies with respect to the special immigrant visa program is essential to ensuring—
(5) the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) states that all Government-controlled processing of applications for special immigrant visas under that Act “should be completed not later than 9 months after the date on which an eligible alien submits all required materials to complete an application for such visa”;
(6) any backlog in processing special immigrant visa applications should be addressed as quickly as possible so as to honor the United States commitment to Afghan allies as soon as possible;
(a) Sense of the Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) the United States and our coalition partners have made progress in the fight against al-Qaeda and ISIS in Afghanistan; however, both groups—
(2) the South Asia strategy correctly emphasizes the importance of a conditions-based United States presence in Afghanistan; therefore, any decision to withdraw the Armed Forces of the United States from Afghanistan should be done in an orderly manner in response to conditions on the ground, and in coordination with the Government of Afghanistan and United States allies and partners in the Resolute Support mission, rather than arbitrary timelines;
(3) a precipitous withdrawal of the Armed Forces of the United States and United States diplomatic and intelligence personnel from Afghanistan without effective, countervailing efforts to secure gains in Afghanistan may allow violent extremist groups to regenerate, threatening the security of the Afghan people and creating a security vacuum that could destabilize the region and provide ample safe haven for extremist groups seeking to conduct external attacks;
(4) ongoing diplomatic efforts to secure a peaceful, negotiated solution to the conflict in Afghanistan are the best path forward for establishing long-term stability and eliminating the threat posed by extremist groups in Afghanistan;
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representative a report that includes—
(A) an assessment of—
(i) the external threat posed by extremist groups operating in Afghanistan to the United States homeland and the homelands of United States allies;
(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3558), as most recently amended by section 1233(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2039), is further amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
(b) Funding.—Subsection (g) of such section 1236, as most recently amended by section 1221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is amended to read as follows:
“(g) Funding.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Overseas Contingency Operations for fiscal year 2021, not more than $322,500,000 may be used to carry out this section.
“(2) LIMITATION AND REPORT.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1), not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the following:
“(i) An explanation of the manner in which such support aligns with the objectives contained in the national defense strategy.
“(ii) A description of the manner in which such support is synchronized with larger whole-of-government funding efforts to strengthen the bilateral relationship between the United States and Iraq.
“(iii) A description of—
“(iv) A plan to fully transition security assistance for the Iraqi Security Forces from the Counter-Islamic State of Iraq and Syria Train and Equip Fund to standing security assistance authorities managed by the Defense Security Cooperation Agency and the Department of State by not later than September 30, 2022.
Section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 127 Stat. 3541), as most recently amended by section 1222(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended—
(1) in the section heading, by striking “the vetted Syrian opposition” and inserting “vetted Syrian groups and individuals”;
(2) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”;
(5) in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), as so redesignated—
(A) in subparagraph (J)(iii), by redesignating subclause (I) as subparagraph (M) and moving the subparagraph four ems to the left;
(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (F) and (G) through (J) as subparagraphs (B) through (G) and (I) through (L), respectively;
(D) by inserting after subparagraph (G), as so redesignated, the following new subparagraph (H):
“(H) The mechanisms and procedures that will be used to monitor and report to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the Senate and House of Representatives any unauthorized end-use of provided training and equipment or other violations of relevant law by appropriately vetted recipients.”; and
(a) Limitation on amount.—Subsection (c) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended—
(b) Source of funds.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking “fiscal year 2020” and inserting “fiscal year 2021”.
(c) Additional authority.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended—
(d) Report.—Subsection (g)(1) of such section is amended by striking “September 30, 2020” and inserting “March 1, 2021”.
(e) Limitation on availability of funds.—Subsection (h) of such section is amended—
Section 1232(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2488), as most recently amended by section 1231 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “, 2019, or 2020” and inserting “2019, 2020, or 2021”.
(a) Prohibition.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to, and the Department may not, implement any activity that recognizes the sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea.
(b) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) if the Secretary of Defense—
Section 1250 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1068), as most recently amended by section 1244 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended—
(1) in subsection (c)—
(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the capability and capacity requirements of the military forces of Ukraine, which shall include the following:
(1) An analysis of the capability gaps and capacity shortfalls of the military forces of Ukraine that includes—
(2) An assessment of the relative priority assigned by the Government of Ukraine to addressing such capability gaps and capacity shortfalls.
(3) An assessment of the capability gaps and capacity shortfalls that—
(4) An assessment of the capability gaps and capacity shortfalls described in paragraph (3)(B) that could be addressed in a sufficient and timely manner by—
(B) Department of Defense security assistance authorized by section 333 of title 10, United States Code;
(b) Resource plan.—Not later than February 15, 2022, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a resource plan for United States security assistance with respect to Ukraine, which shall include the following:
(1) A plan to resource the following initiatives and programs with respect to Ukraine in fiscal year 2023 and the four succeeding fiscal years to meet the most critical capability gaps and capacity shortfalls of the military forces of Ukraine:
(2) With respect to the navy of Ukraine, the following:
(A) A capability development plan, with milestones, detailing the manner in which the United States will assist the Government of Ukraine in meeting the requirements referred to in subsection (a)(1)(A).
(B) A plan for United States cooperation with third countries and international organizations that have the resources and ability to provide immediate assistance to the navy of Ukraine while maintaining interoperability with United States platforms to the extent feasible.
(3) With respect to the air force of Ukraine, the following:
(A) A capability development plan, with milestones, detailing the manner in which the United States will assist the Government of Ukraine in meeting the requirements referred to in subsection (a)(1)(B).
(B) A plan for United States cooperation with third countries and international organizations that have the resources and ability to provide immediate assistance to the air force of Ukraine while maintaining interoperability with United States platforms to the extent feasible.
(4) An assessment of progress on defense institutional reforms in Ukraine, including with respect to the navy and air force of Ukraine, during fiscal year 2023 and the four succeeding fiscal years that will be essential for—
(A) enabling effective use and sustainment of capabilities developed under security assistance authorities described in this section;
(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) and the resource plan required by subsection (b) shall each be submitted in a classified form with an unclassified summary.
It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) the United States should support the designation of Ukraine as an enhanced opportunities partner as part of the Partnership Interoperability Initiative of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization;
(2) the participation of Ukraine in the enhanced opportunities partner program is in the shared security interests of Ukraine, the United States, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization alliance;
(3) the unique experience, capabilities, and technical expertise of Ukraine, especially with respect to hybrid warfare, cybersecurity, and foreign disinformation, would enable Ukraine to make a positive contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization alliance through participation in the enhanced opportunities partner program;
(4) while not a replacement for North Atlantic Treaty Organization membership, participation in the enhanced opportunities partner program would have significant benefits for the security of Ukraine, including—
Subsection (h) of section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 333 note), as most recently amended by section 1247 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is further amended—
It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) normalization of relations between Kosovo and Serbia is in the interest of both countries and would enhance security and stability in the Western Balkans;
(2) the United States should continue to support the diplomatic efforts of Kosovo and Serbia to reach a historic agreement to normalize relations between the two countries;
(3) mutual recognition should be a central element of normalization of relations between Kosovo and Serbia;
(4) both Kosovo and Serbia should refrain from actions that would make an agreement more difficult to achieve;
(5) the Kosovo Force of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization continues to play an indispensable role in maintaining security and stability, which are the essential predicates for the success of the diplomatic efforts of Kosovo and Serbia to achieve normalization of relations;
(6) the participation of the United States Armed Forces in the Kosovo Force is foundational to the credibility and success of mission of the Kosovo Force;
(7) with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies and other European partners contributing over 80 percent of the troops for the mission, the Kosovo Force represents a positive example of burden sharing;
It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) the 2018 National Defense Strategy affirms the re-emergence of long-term strategic competition with the Russian Federation as a principal priority for the Department of Defense that requires sustained investment due to the magnitude of the threat posed to United States security, prosperity, and alliances and partnerships;
(2) given the continued military modernization of the Russian Federation, including the development of long-range strike systems and other advanced capabilities, the United States should prioritize efforts within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to implement timely measures to ensure that the deterrence and defense posture of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization remains credible and effective;
(3) the United States should reaffirm support for the open-door policy of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization;
(4) to enhance deterrence against aggression by the Russian Federation, the Department of Defense should—
(A) continue—
(B) increase—
(C) maintain robust naval presence at Souda Bay, Greece, and pursue opportunities for increased United States presence at other locations in Greece;
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the head of any other relevant Federal department or agency, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on Russian Federation support of racially and ethnically motivated violent extremist groups and networks in Europe and the United States, including such support provided by agents and entities of the Russian Federation acting at the direction or for the benefit of the Government of the Russian Federation.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A list of each racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist group or network in Europe or the United States known to meet, or suspected of meeting, the following criteria:
(A) The group or network has been targeted or recruited by the security services of the Russian Federation.
(B) The group or network has received support (including training, disinformation or amplification on social media platforms, financial support, and any other support) from the Russian Federation or an agent or entity of the Russian Federation acting at the direction or for the benefit of the Government of the Russian Federation.
(2) An assessment of the manner in which Russian Federation support of such groups or networks aligns with the strategic interests of the Russian Federation with respect to Europe and the United States.
(5) A description of any relationship or affiliation between such groups or networks and ultranationalist or extremist political parties in Europe and the United States, and an assessment of the manner in which the Russian Federation may use such a relationship or affiliation to advance the strategic interests of the Russian Federation.
(6) A description of the use by the Russian Federation of social media platforms to support or amplify the presence or messaging of such groups or networks, and an assessment of any effort in Europe or the United States to counter such support or amplification.
(7) A description of the legal and political implications of the designation of the Russian Imperial Movement, and members of the leadership of the Russian Imperial Movement, as specially designated global terrorists pursuant to Executive Order 13224 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to blocking property and prohibiting transactions with persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism) and the response of the Government of the Russian Federation to such designation.
(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.
(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (l) the following new section 2350m:
Ҥ 2350m. Participation in European program on multilateral exchange of surface transportation services
“(a) Participation authorized.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may authorize the participation of the Department of Defense in the Surface Exchange of Services program (in this section referred to as the ‘SEOS program’) of the Movement Coordination Centre Europe.
“(b) Written arrangement or agreement.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Participation of the Department of Defense in the SEOS program shall be in accordance with a written arrangement or agreement entered into by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, and the Movement Coordination Centre Europe.
“(2) NOTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees notification of any arrangement or agreement entered into under paragraph (1).
“(3) FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS.—If Department of Defense facilities, equipment, or funds are used to support the SEOS program, the written arrangement or agreement under paragraph (1) shall specify the details of any equitable cost-sharing or other funding arrangement.
“(4) OTHER ELEMENTS.—Any written arrangement or agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall require that any accrued credits or liability resulting from an unequal exchange or transfer of surface transportation services shall be liquidated through the SEOS program not less than once every five years.
“(c) Implementation.—In carrying out any arrangement or agreement entered into under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may—
“(d) Crediting of receipts.—Any amount received by the Department of Defense as part of the SEOS program shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary of Defense, to—
“(e) Annual report.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the authority under this section is in effect, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on Department of Defense participation in the SEOS program during such fiscal year.
(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1240(a), is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2350o. Participation in programs relating to coordination or exchange of air refueling and air transportation services
“(a) Participation authorized.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may authorize the participation of the Department of Defense in programs relating to the coordination or exchange of air refueling and air transportation services, including in the arrangement known as the Air Transport and Air-to-Air Refueling and other Exchanges of Services program (in this section referred to as the ‘ATARES program’).
“(2) SCOPE OF PARTICIPATION.—Participation of the Department of Defense in programs referred to in paragraph (1) may include—
“(b) Written arrangement or agreement.—Participation of the Department of Defense in a program referred to in subsection (a)(1) shall be in accordance with a written arrangement or agreement entered into by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.
“(c) Implementation.—In carrying out any arrangement or agreement entered into under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may—
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter, as amended by section 1240(b), is further amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“2350o. Participation in programs relating to coordination or exchange of air refueling and air transportation services.”.
(c) Repeal.—Section 1276 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2350c note) is repealed.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the continued security of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania is critical to achieving United States national security interests and defense objectives against the acute and formidable threat posed by Russia;
(2) the United States and the Baltic states are leaders in the mission of defending independence and democracy from aggression and in promoting stability and security within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), with non-NATO partners, and with other international organizations such as the European Union;
(3) the Baltic states are model NATO allies in terms of burden sharing and capital investment in materiel critical to United States and allied security, investment of over 2 percent of their gross domestic product on defense expenditure, allocating over 20 percent of their defense budgets on capital modernization, matching security assistance from the United States, frequently deploying their forces around the world in support of allied and United States objectives, and sharing diplomatic, technical, military, and analytical expertise on defense and security matters;
(4) the United States should continue to strengthen bilateral and multilateral defense by, with, and through allied nations, particularly those that possess expertise and dexterity but do not enjoy the benefits of national economies of scale;
(5) the United States should pursue a dedicated initiative focused on defense and security assistance, coordination, and planning designed to ensure the continued security of the Baltic states and on deterring current and future challenges to the national sovereignty of United States allies and partners in the Baltic region; and
(6) such an initiative should include an innovative and comprehensive conflict deterrence strategy for the Baltic region encompassing the unique geography of the Baltic states, modern and diffuse threats to their land, sea, and air spaces, and necessary improvements to their defense posture, including command-and-control infrastructure, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities, communications equipment and networks, and special forces.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out an initiative to ensure the effective implementation of the National Defense Strategy with respect to the Indo-Pacific region, to be known as the “Pacific Deterrence Initiative” (in this section referred to as the “Initiative”).
(b) Purpose.—The purpose of the Initiative is to carry out only the following activities:
(1) Activities to increase the lethality of the joint force in the Indo-Pacific region, including, but not limited to—
(A) by improving active and passive defenses against theater cruise, ballistic, and hypersonic missiles for bases, operating locations, and other critical infrastructure at locations west of the International Date Line; and
(2) Activities to enhance the design and posture of the joint force in the Indo-Pacific region, including, but not limited to, by—
(A) transitioning from large, centralized, and unhardened infrastructure to smaller, dispersed, resilient, and adaptive basing at locations west of the International Date Line;
(B) increasing the number and capabilities of expeditionary airfields and ports in the Indo-Pacific region available for operational use at locations west of the International Date Line;
(C) enhancing pre-positioned forward stocks of fuel, munitions, equipment, and materiel at locations west of the International Date Line;
(c) Plan required.—Not later than February 15, 2021, the Secretary, in consultation with the Commander of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to expend not less than the amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (e)(2).
(d) Budget display information.—The Secretary shall include in the materials of the Department of Defense in support of the budget of the President (submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code) for fiscal year 2022 and each fiscal year thereafter a detailed budget display for the Initiative that includes the following information:
(1) A future-years plan with respect to activities and resources for the Initiative for the applicable fiscal year and not fewer than the four following fiscal years.
(3) With respect to research, development, test, and evaluation accounts—
(4) With respect to operation and maintenance accounts—
(5) With respect to military personnel accounts—
(6) With respect to each project under military construction accounts (including with respect to unspecified minor military construction and amounts for planning and design), the country, location, project title, and project amount by fiscal year.
(7) With respect to the activities described in subsection (b)—
(8) With respect to each military service—
(e) Authorization of appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the activities of the Initiative described in subsection (b) the following:
(f) Repeal.—Section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1676), as most recently amended by section 1253 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2054), is repealed.
In commemoration of the 25th anniversary of the normalization of diplomatic relations between the United States and Vietnam, the Senate—
(1) welcomes the historic progress and achievements in United States-Vietnam relations over the last 25 years;
(2) congratulates Vietnam on its chairmanship of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and its election as a nonpermanent member of the United Nations Security Council, both of which symbolize the positive leadership role of Vietnam in regional and global affairs;
(3) commends the commitment of Vietnam to resolve international disputes through peaceful means on the basis of international law;
(5) encourages the United States and Vietnam to elevate their comprehensive partnership to a strategic partnership based on mutual understanding, shared interests, and a common desire to promote peace, cooperation, prosperity, and security in the Indo-Pacific region;
(6) affirms the commitment of the United States to continue to address war legacy issues, including through dioxin remediation, unexploded ordnance removal, accounting for prisoners of war and soldiers missing in action, and other activities; and
(7) supports deepening defense cooperation between the United States and Vietnam, including with respect to maritime security, cybersecurity, counterterrorism, information sharing, humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, military medicine, peacekeeping operations, defense trade, and other areas.
(a) Transfer authority.—Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may transfer to the Secretary of State, for use by the United States Agency for International Development, amounts to be used for the Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup in Vietnam.
(b) Limitation on amount.—Not more than $15,000,000 may be transferred in fiscal year 2021 under the transfer authority in subsection (a).
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, in cooperation with other appropriate Federal departments and agencies, is authorized to carry out a cooperative program with the Ministry of Defense of Vietnam to assist in accounting for Vietnamese personnel missing in action.
(a) In general.—Chapter 767 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 7596. Provision of goods and services at Kwajalein Atoll
“(a) Authority.— (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary of the Army, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may provide goods and services, including interatoll transportation, to the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and other eligible patrons, as determined by the Secretary of the Army, at Kwajalein Atoll.
“(2) The Secretary of the Army may not provide goods or services under this section if doing so would be inconsistent, as determined by the Secretary of State, with the Compact of Free Association between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or any subsidiary agreement or implementing arrangement.
“(b) Reimbursement.— (1) The Secretary of the Army may collect reimbursement from the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and eligible patrons for the provision of goods or services under subsection (a).
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“7596. Provision of goods and services at Kwajalein Atoll.”.
(c) Briefing.—Not later than December 31, 2021, the Secretary of the Army shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the use of the authority under section 7596(a) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), in fiscal year 2021, including a written summary describing the goods and services provided on a reimbursable basis and the goods and services provided on a nonreimbursable basis.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may authorize—
(b) Scope of participation.—Participation of the Department in the ATARES program shall be limited to—
(c) Limitations.—
(d) Written arrangement or agreement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Participation of the Department in the ATARES program shall be in accordance with a written arrangement or agreement entered into by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.
(2) FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS.—If Department facilities, equipment, or funds are used to support the ATARES program, the written arrangement or agreement under paragraph (1) shall specify the details of any equitable cost-sharing or other funding arrangement.
(3) OTHER ELEMENTS.—Any written arrangement or agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall require any accrued credit or liability resulting from an unequal exchange or transfer of air transportation or air refueling services to be liquidated through the ATARES program not less frequently than once every five years.
(e) Implementation.—In carrying out any written arrangement or agreement entered into under subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may—
(a) Sense of Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) the memorandum of understanding agreed to by the United States and the Republic of Singapore on December 6, 2019, to establish a fighter jet training detachment in Guam should be commended;
(b) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the merit and feasibility of entering into agreements similar to the memorandum of understanding referred to in subsection (a)(1) with other United States allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific region, including Japan, Australia, and India.
(a) Statement of policy.—It is the policy of the United States—
(1) that the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) and the “Six Assurances” provided by the United States to Taiwan in July 1982 are the foundation for United States-Taiwan relations;
(2) that nothing in the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) constrains deepening, to the extent possible, the extensive, close, and friendly relations of the United States and Taiwan, including defense relations;
(3) that the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) shall be implemented and executed in a manner consistent with evolving political, security, and economic dynamics and circumstances;
(4) that, as set forth in the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.), the United States expects the “future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means,” and that “any effort to determine the future of Taiwan by other than peaceful means” is “a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the United States”;
(5) that the increasingly coercive and aggressive behavior of the People’s Republic of China towards Taiwan, including growing military maneuvers targeting Taiwan, is contrary to the expectation of the peaceful resolution of the future of Taiwan;
(6) that, as set forth in the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.), the United States will support the development of capable, ready, and modern defense forces necessary for Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability, including by—
(A) supporting acquisition by Taiwan of defense articles and services through foreign military sales, direct commercial sales, and industrial cooperation, with an emphasis on capabilities that support the asymmetric defense strategy of Taiwan, including antiship, coastal defense, antiarmor, air defense, undersea warfare, advanced command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and resilient command and control capabilities;
(C) conducting practical training and military exercises with Taiwan, including, as appropriate, the Rim of the Pacific exercise, combined training at the National Training Center at Fort Erwin, and bilateral naval exercises and training;
(D) examining the potential for expanding professional military education and technical training opportunities in the United States for military personnel of Taiwan;
(E) pursuing a strategy of military engagement with Taiwan that fully integrates exchanges at the strategic, policy, and functional levels;
(F) increasing exchanges between senior defense officials and general officers of the United States and Taiwan consistent with the Taiwan Travel Act (Public Law 115–135; 132 Stat. 341), especially for the purpose of enhancing cooperation on defense planning and improving the interoperability of the military forces of the United States and Taiwan;
(7) that, as set forth in the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.), the United States will maintain the capacity “to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan”, including the capacity of the United States Armed Forces to deny a “fait accompli” operation by the People’s Republic of China to rapidly seize control of Taiwan.
It is the sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should conduct port calls in Taiwan with the USNS Comfort and the USNS Mercy —
(1) to continue the collaboration between the United States and Taiwan on COVID–19 responses, which has included—
(2) to further improve the cooperation between the United States and Taiwan on military medicine and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief;
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty and deployed to the Republic of Korea to fewer than 28,500 such members of the Armed Forces until 90 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
It is the sense of Congress that—
It is the policy of the United States—
(1) to strengthen alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region and Europe and with like-minded countries around the globe to effectively compete with the People’s Republic of China; and
(2) to work in collaboration with such allies and partners—
(A) to address significant diplomatic, economic, and military challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China;
(C) to promote the peaceful resolution of territorial disputes in accordance with international law;
(D) to promote private sector-led long-term economic development while countering efforts by the Government of the People’s Republic of China to leverage predatory economic practices as a means of political and economic coercion in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond;
(E) to promote the values of democracy and human rights, including through efforts to end the repression by the Chinese Communist Party of political dissidents and Uyghurs and other ethnic Muslim minorities, Tibetan Buddhists, Christians, and other minorities;
Section 3 of the Act entitled “An Act to prohibit the commercial export of covered munitions items to the Hong Kong Police Force”, approved November 27, 2019 (Public Law 116–77; 133 Stat. 1174), is amended by striking “one year after the date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “on November 27, 2021”.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The Department of Defense Indo-Pacific Strategy Report, released on June 1, 2019, states: “[T]he Asia Reassurance Initiative Act, a major bipartisan legislation, was signed into law by President Trump on December 31, 2018. This legislation enshrines a generational whole-of-government policy framework that demonstrates U.S. commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific region and includes initiatives that promote sovereignty, rule of law, democracy, economic engagement, and regional security.”.
(2) The Indo-Pacific Strategy Report further states: “The United States has a vital interest in upholding the rules-based international order, which includes a strong, prosperous, and democratic Taiwan…The Department [of Defense] is committed to providing Taiwan with defense articles and services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.”.
(3) Section 209(b) of the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018 (22 U.S.C. 3301 note), signed into law on December 31, 2018—
(A) builds on longstanding commitments enshrined in the Taiwan Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) to provide Taiwan with defense articles; and
(B) states: “The President should conduct regular transfers of defense articles to Taiwan that are tailored to meet the existing and likely future threats from the People’s Republic of China, including supporting the efforts of Taiwan to develop and integrate asymmetric capabilities, as appropriate, including mobile, survivable, and cost-effective capabilities, into its military forces.”.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–409; 132 Stat. 5387) has recommitted the United States to support the close, economic, political, and security relationship between the United States and Taiwan; and
(c) Briefing.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, or their designees, shall brief the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives on the efforts to implement section 209(b) of the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018 (22 U.S.C. 3301 note).
(a) Review.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the official designated to provide oversight of acquisition and cross-servicing agreements under section 2342(f) of title 10, United States Code, shall conduct a review of acquisition and cross-servicing transactions for which reimbursement to the United States is overdue under section 2345 of that title.
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the designated official described in subsection (a) shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the review.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) For each acquisition and cross-servicing transaction valued at $1,000,000 or more for which reimbursement to the United States was overdue as of October 1, 2019—
(B) A description of the steps taken to implement the recommendations made in the report of the Government Accountability Office entitled “Defense Logistics Agreements: DOD Should Improve Oversight and Seek Payment from Foreign Partners for Thousands of Orders It Identifies as Overdue” issued in March 2020, including efforts to validate data reported under this subsection and in the system of record for acquisition and cross-servicing agreements of the Department of Defense.
(C) The amount of reimbursement received from foreign partners for each order—
Section 2350j of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(f) Report on contributions received from designated countries.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 15 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the burden sharing contributions received under this section from designated countries.
“(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following for the preceding fiscal year:
“(E) The amount of such burden sharing contributions expended, by eligible category, including compensation for local national employees, military construction projects, and supplies and services of the Department of Defense.
(a) In general.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains an assessment of—
(a) Finding; sense of Congress.—
(1) FINDING.—Congress finds that section 1003 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1985 (Public Law 98–525; 63 Stat. 2241)—
(b) Reports on allied contributions to the common defense.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 each year, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the heads of other Federal agencies, as the Secretary determines to be necessary, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing a description of—
(A) the annual defense spending by each country described in paragraph (2), including available data on nominal budget figures and defense spending as a percentage of the gross domestic products of each such country for the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the report is submitted;
(2) COUNTRIES DESCRIBED.—The countries described in this paragraph are the following:
(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1241(a), is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2350p. Reciprocal patient movement agreements
“(a) Authority.—Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may enter into a bilateral or multilateral memorandum of understanding or other formal agreement with one or more governments of partner countries that provides for—
“(1) the interchangeable, nonreimbursable use of patient movement personnel, either individually or as members of a patient movement crew or team, and equipment, belonging to one partner country to perform patient movement services aboard the aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of another partner country;
“(b) Certification.— (1) Before entering into a memorandum of understanding or other formal agreement with the government of a partner country under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall certify in writing that the professional credentials, certifications, licenses, and approvals for patient movement personnel and patient movement equipment of the partner country—
“(A) meet or exceed the equivalent standards of the United States for similar personnel and equipment; and
“(B) will provide for a level of care comparable to, or better than, the level of care provided by the Department of Defense.
“(c) Suspension.—If the Secretary of Defense is unable to recertify a partner country as required by subsection (b)(2)(B), use of the personnel or equipment of the partner country by the Department of Defense under a memorandum of understanding or other formal agreement concluded pursuant to subsection (a) shall be suspended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense is able to recertify the partner country.
Subsection (g) of section 943 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578), as most recently amended by section 1282(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2542) and as redesignated by section 1051(n)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1564), is further amended by striking “2021” and inserting “2024”.
Section 1210A(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
(a) In general.—Not later than 30 days before a reduction in the total number of members of the Armed Forces deployed to the Multinational Force and Observers in Egypt to fewer than 430 such members of the Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notification that includes the following:
(1) A detailed accounting of the number of members of the Armed Forces to be withdrawn from the Multinational Force and Observers in Egypt and the capabilities that such members of the Armed Forces provide in support of the mission.
(2) An explanation of national security interests of the United States served by such a reduction and an assessment of the effect, if any, such a reduction is expected to have on the security of United States partners in the region.
(3) A description of consultations by the Secretary with the other countries that contribute military forces to the Multinational Force and Observers, including Australia, Canada, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Fiji, France, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the United Kingdom, and Uruguay, with respect to the planned force reduction and the results of such consultations.
(4) An assessment of whether other countries, including the countries that contribute military forces to the Multinational Force and Observers, will increase their contributions of military forces to compensate for the capabilities withdrawn by the United States.
(5) An explanation of—
(A) any anticipated negative impact of such a reduction on the ability of the Multinational Force and Observers in Egypt to fulfill its mission of supervising the implementation of the security provisions of the 1979 Treaty of Peace between Egypt and Israel and employing best efforts to prevent any violation of the terms of such treaty; and
Section 1286 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(2)—
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(C) includes requirements for appropriate senior officials of institutions of higher education to receive from appropriate Government agencies updated and periodic briefings that describe the espionage risks posed by technical intelligence gathering activities of near-peer strategic competitors.”; and
(a) Sense of Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) the United States Government has a responsibility to undertake all reasonable measures to ensure that members of the Armed Forces never confront a more technologically advanced foe;
(2) the United States and Israel have several cooperative technology programs to develop and field capabilities in missile defense, countertunneling, and counterunmanned aerial systems; and
(3) building on positive ongoing efforts, the United States and Israel should further institutionalize and strengthen their defense innovation partnership by establishing a United States-Israel Operations-Technology Working Group to identify and expeditiously field capabilities that the military forces of both countries need to deter and defeat respective adversaries.
(b) United States-Israel Operations-Technology Working Group.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Minister of Defense of Israel, shall establish a United States-Israel Operations-Technology Working Group (in this subsection referred to as the “Working Group”) for the following purposes:
(A) To provide a standing forum for the United States and Israel to systematically share intelligence-informed military capability requirements.
(B) To identify military capability requirements common to both the Department of Defense and the Ministry of Defense of Israel.
(C) To assist defense suppliers in the United States and Israel, by incorporating recommendations from such defense suppliers, with respect to conducting joint science, technology, research, development, test, evaluation, and production efforts.
(D) To develop, as feasible and advisable, combined United States-Israel plans to research, develop, procure, and field weapons systems and military capabilities as quickly and economically as possible to meet common capability requirements of the Department of Defense and the Ministry of Defense of Israel.
(2) WORKING GROUP LEADERSHIP.—
(3) WORKING GROUP MEMBERSHIP.—
(A) UNITED STATES MEMBERSHIP.—The Secretary, in consultation with other Cabinet members, shall designate one or more individuals to serve as members of the Working Group.
(i) MANDATORY UNITED STATES MEMBERS.—The membership of the Working Group shall consist of, at a minimum, representatives from—
(III) each of the military departments (including, as appropriate, subordinate entities such as Army Futures Command and research laboratories);
(4) EXISTING EFFORTS.—
(5) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.—
(6) REPORTS.—
(A) INITIAL REPORT.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the establishment of the Working Group, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an initial report on the Working Group.
(ii) ELEMENTS.—The report required by clause (i) shall include the following:
(II) The name of each individual of the Government of the United States and of the Government of Israel designated to lead the Working Group.
(III) The name of each member of the Working Group designated under subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (3).
(B) ANNUAL REPORT.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 15 of each year following the submittal of the initial report required by subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the activities of the Working Group during the preceding calendar year.
(ii) ELEMENTS.—The report required by clause (i) shall include the following:
(I) A summary of the performance of the Working Group—
(III) A description of any United States, or any United States-Israel, science and technology efforts, or research, development, test, and evaluation efforts, associated with the military capabilities described under subclause (II) carried out during the reporting period.
(IV) A description of any obstacle or challenge associated with an effort described in subclause (III) and the plan of the Working Group to address such obstacle or challenge.
(V) A description of any request to the Working Group made by a United States or Israel defense supplier for combined science and technology efforts or combined research, development, test, and evaluation efforts, including—
(VI) A description of the efforts of the Working Group to prevent the People's Republic of China or the Russian Federation from obtaining intellectual property or military technology associated with combined United States and Israel science and technology efforts and research, development, test, and evaluation efforts.
(a) Office of Sanctions Coordination of the Department of State.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2651a) is amended—
(B) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
“(g) Office of Sanctions Coordination.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—There is established, within the Department of State, an Office of Sanctions Coordination (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Office’).
“(3) DUTIES.—The head of the Office shall—
“(B) serve as the principal advisor to the senior management of the Department and the Secretary regarding the development and implementation of sanctions policy;
“(C) serve as the lead representative of the United States in diplomatic engagement on sanctions matters;
“(D) consult and closely coordinate with allies and partners of the United States, including the United Kingdom, the European Union and member countries of the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea, to ensure the maximum effectiveness of sanctions imposed by the United States and such allies and partners;
(2) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter until the date that is 2 years after such date of enactment, the Secretary of State shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on the efforts of the Department of State to establish the Office of Sanctions Coordination pursuant to section 1(g) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, as amended by paragraph (1), including a description of—
(b) Coordination with allies and partners of the United States.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall develop and implement mechanisms and programs, as appropriate, through the head of the Office of Sanctions Coordination established pursuant to section 1(g) of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, as amended by subsection (a)(1), to coordinate the development and implementation of United States sanctions policies with allies and partners of the United States, including the United Kingdom, the European Union and member countries of the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea.
(2) INFORMATION SHARING.—The Secretary should pursue the development and implementation of mechanisms and programs under paragraph (1), as appropriate, that involve the sharing of information with respect to policy development and sanctions implementation.
(3) CAPACITY BUILDING.—The Secretary should pursue efforts, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury and the head of any other agency the Secretary considers appropriate, to assist allies and partners of the United States, including the countries specified in paragraph (1), as appropriate, in the development of their legal and technical capacities to develop and implement sanctions authorities.
(4) EXCHANGE PROGRAMS.—In furtherance of the efforts described in paragraph (3), the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury and the head of any other agency the Secretary considers appropriate, may enter into agreements with counterpart agencies in foreign governments establishing exchange programs for the temporary detail of government employees to share information and expertise with respect to the development and implementation of sanctions authorities.
(5) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter until the date that is 5 years after such date of enactment, the Secretary of State shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on the efforts of the Department of State to implement this section, including a description of—
(c) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of the Congress that the President should appoint a coordinator for sanctions and national economic security issues within the framework of the National Security Council.
This subtitle may be cited as the “Robert Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act”.
(a) Review.—The Secretary of State shall review the cases of United States nationals detained abroad to determine if there is credible information that they are being detained unlawfully or wrongfully, based on criteria which may include whether—
(1) United States officials receive or possess credible information indicating innocence of the detained individual;
(2) the individual is being detained solely or substantially because he or she is a United States national;
(3) the individual is being detained solely or substantially to influence United States Government policy or to secure economic or political concessions from the United States Government;
(4) the detention appears to be because the individual sought to obtain, exercise, defend, or promote freedom of the press, freedom of religion, or the right to peacefully assemble;
(6) independent nongovernmental organizations or journalists have raised legitimate questions about the innocence of the detained individual;
(7) the United States mission in the country where the individual is being detained has received credible reports that the detention is a pretext for an illegitimate purpose;
(b) Referrals to the special envoy.—Upon a determination by the Secretary of State, based on the totality of the circumstances, that there is credible information that the detention of a United States national abroad is unlawful or wrongful, and regardless of whether the detention is by a foreign government or a nongovernmental actor, the Secretary shall transfer responsibility for such case from the Bureau of Consular Affairs of the Department of State to the Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs created pursuant to section 1293.
(c) Report.—
(1) ANNUAL REPORT.—
(2) COMPOSITION.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include current estimates of the number of individuals so detained, as well as relevant information about particular cases, such as—
(A) the name of the individual, unless the provision of such information is inconsistent with section 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Privacy Act of 1974”);
(d) Resource guidance.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and after consulting with relevant organizations that advocate on behalf of United States nationals detained abroad and the Family Engagement Coordinator established pursuant to section 1294(c)(2), the Secretary of State shall provide resource guidance in writing for government officials and families of unjustly or wrongfully detained individuals.
(2) CONTENT.—The resource guidance required under paragraph (1) should include—
(A) information to help families understand United States policy concerning the release of United States nationals unlawfully or wrongfully held abroad;
(B) contact information for officials in the Department of State or other government agencies suited to answer family questions;
(C) relevant information about options available to help families obtain the release of unjustly or wrongfully detained individuals, such as guidance on how families may engage with United States diplomatic and consular channels to ensure prompt and regular access for the detained individual to legal counsel, family members, humane treatment, and other services;
(a) Establishment.—There shall be a Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, appointed by the President, who shall report to the Secretary of State.
(c) Responsibilities.—The Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs shall—
(2) coordinate all diplomatic engagements and strategy in support of hostage recovery efforts, in coordination with the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell and consistent with policy guidance communicated through the Hostage Response Group;
(3) in coordination with the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell as appropriate, coordinate diplomatic engagements regarding cases in which a foreign government has detained a United States national and the United States Government regards such detention as unlawful or wrongful;
(b) Participation.—The President shall direct the heads of each of the following executive departments, agencies, and offices to make available personnel to participate in the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell:
(c) Personnel.—The Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell shall include—
(1) a Director, who shall be a full-time senior officer or employee of the United States Government;
(d) Duties.—The Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell shall—
(1) coordinate efforts by participating agencies to ensure that all relevant information, expertise, and resources are brought to bear to secure the safe recovery of United States nationals held hostage abroad;
(2) if directed, coordinate the United States Government's response to other hostage-takings occurring abroad in which the United States has a national interest;
(3) if directed, coordinate or assist the United States Government’s response to help secure the release of United States nationals unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad; and
(4) pursuant to policy guidance coordinated through the National Security Council—
(A) identify and recommend hostage recovery options and strategies to the President through the National Security Council or the Deputies Committee of the National Security Council;
(B) coordinate efforts by participating agencies to ensure that information regarding hostage events, including potential recovery options and engagements with families and external actors (including foreign governments), is appropriately shared within the United States Government to facilitate a coordinated response to a hostage-taking;
(C) assess and track all hostage-takings of United States nationals abroad and provide regular reports to the President and Congress on the status of such cases and any measures being taken toward the hostages' safe recovery;
(D) provide a forum for intelligence sharing and, with the support of the Director of National Intelligence, coordinate the declassification of relevant information;
(E) coordinate efforts by participating agencies to provide appropriate support and assistance to hostages and their families in a coordinated and consistent manner and to provide families with timely information regarding significant events in their cases;
(a) Establishment.—The President shall establish a Hostage Response Group, chaired by a designated member of the National Security Council or the Deputies Committee of the National Security Council, to be convened on a regular basis, to further the safe recovery of United States nationals held hostage abroad or unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad, and to be tasked with coordinating the United States Government response to other hostage-takings occurring abroad in which the United States has a national interest.
(b) Membership.—The regular members of the Hostage Response Group shall include the Director of the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell, the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell's Family Engagement Coordinator, the Special Envoy appointed pursuant to section 1293, and representatives from the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, and other agencies as the President, from time to time, may designate.
(c) Duties.—The Hostage Recovery Group shall—
(1) identify and recommend hostage recovery options and strategies to the President through the National Security Council;
(2) coordinate the development and implementation of United States hostage recovery policies, strategies, and procedures;
(3) receive regular updates from the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell and the Special Envoy for Hostage Affairs on the status of United States nationals being held hostage or unlawfully or wrongfully detained abroad and measures being taken to effect safe recoveries;
(4) coordinate the provision of policy guidance to the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell, including reviewing recovery options proposed by the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell and working to resolve disputes within the Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell;
(a) In general.—The President may impose the sanctions described in subsection (b) with respect to any foreign person the President determines, based on credible evidence—
(b) Sanctions described.—The sanctions described in this subsection are the following:
(1) INELIGIBILITY FOR VISAS, ADMISSION, OR PAROLE.—
(A) VISAS, ADMISSION, OR PAROLE.—An alien described in subsection (a) may be—
(iii) otherwise ineligible to be admitted or paroled into the United States or to receive any other benefit under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.).
(2) BLOCKING OF PROPERTY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The President may exercise all of the powers granted to the President under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), to the extent necessary to block and prohibit all transactions in property and interests in property of a foreign person described in subsection (a) if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.
(B) INAPPLICABILITY OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY REQUIREMENT.—The requirements of section 202 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701) shall not apply for purposes of this section.
(c) Exceptions.—
(1) EXCEPTION FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.—Sanctions under this section shall not apply to any activity subject to the reporting requirements under title V of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.) or any authorized intelligence activities of the United States.
(2) EXCEPTION TO COMPLY WITH INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS AND FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES.—Sanctions under subsection (b)(1) shall not apply with respect to an alien if admitting or paroling the alien into the United States is necessary—
(d) Penalties.—A person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of subsection (b)(2) or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out that subsection shall be subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as a person that commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) of that section.
(e) Termination of sanctions.—The President may terminate the application of sanctions under this section with respect to a person if the President determines that—
(1) information exists that the person did not engage in the activity for which sanctions were imposed;
(f) Reporting requirement.—If the President terminates sanctions pursuant to subsection (d), the President shall report to the appropriate congressional committees a written justification for such termination within 15 days.
(g) Implementation of regulatory authority.—The President may exercise all authorities provided under sections 203 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 1704) to carry out this section.
(h) Exception relating to importation of goods.—
(i) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) FOREIGN PERSON.—The term “foreign person” means—
(2) UNITED STATES PERSON.—The term “United States person” means—
(A) an individual who is a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the United States;
In this subtitle:
(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(2) UNITED STATES NATIONAL.—The term “United States national” means—
(A) a United States national as defined in section 101(a)(22) or section 308 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22), 8 U.S.C. 1408); and
(a) In general.—Of the $288,490,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711), the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:
(b) Availability of funds.—Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b) Use.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries.
There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $64,300,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.
(a) In general.—Section 1518 of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 418) is amended to read as follows:
“SEC. 1518. Periodic inspection of Retirement Home facilities.
“(a) Inspections.—The Chief Operating Officer shall request the inspection of each facility of the Retirement Home by a nationally recognized civilian accrediting organization in accordance with section 1511(g) on a frequency consistent with the standards of such organization.
“(b) Availability of staff and records.—The Chief Operating Officer and the Administrator of a facility being inspected under this section shall make all staff, other personnel, and records of the facility available to the civilian accrediting organization in a timely manner for purposes of inspections under this section.
(b) Conforming amendments.—The Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) is further amended as follows:
(1) In section 1513A(c)(2) (24 U.S.C. 413a(c)(2)), by striking “(including requirements identified in applicable reports of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense)”.
(2) In section 1516(b)(3) (24 U.S.C. 416(b)(3))—
(3) In section 1517(e)(2) (24 U.S.C. 417(e)(2)), by striking “the Inspector General of the Department of Defense,”.
(a) Expansion of eligibility.—Section 1512(a) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 412(a)) is amended—
(3) by adding the following new paragraph:
“(5) Persons who are eligible for retired pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, and—
“(B) are enrolled in coverage under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code; or
(b) Parity of fees and deductions.—Section 1514(c) of such Act (24 U.S.C. 414(c)) is amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2)
“(2) (A) The fee shall be fixed as a percentage of the monthly income and monthly payments (including Federal payments) received by a resident. The percentage shall be the same for each facility of the Retirement Home. The Secretary of Defense may make any adjustment in a percentage that the Secretary determines appropriate.
“(B) The calculation of monthly income and monthly payments under subparagraph (A) for a resident eligible under section 1512(a)(5) shall not be less than the retirement pay for equivalent active duty service as determined by the Chief Operating Officer, except as the Chief Operating Officer may provide because of compelling personal circumstances.”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(4) The Administrator of each facility of the Retirement Home may collect a fee upon admission from a resident accepted under section 1512(a)(5) equal to the deductions then in effect under section 1007(i)(1) of title 37, United States Code, for each year of non-regular service, and shall deposit such fee in the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund.”.
(a) Authority for transfer of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1405 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $130,400,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571).
(b) Treatment of transferred funds.—For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds transferred under subsection (a) shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(c) Use of transferred funds.—For purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).
The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense for overseas contingency operations in such amounts as may be designated as provided in section 251(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 901(b)(2)(A)(ii)).
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4402.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act.
(a) Authority To transfer authorizations.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2021 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(a) Extension of availability of funds for security of Afghan women.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 1520 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended, in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “fiscal year 2020” and inserting “fiscal year 2021”.
(b) Assessment of Afghanistan progress on objectives.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “June 1, 2020” and inserting “March 1, 2021”;
(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking “; and” and inserting “, including specific milestones achieved since the date on which the 2020 progress report was submitted;”;
(D) by adding at the end the following:
“(C) the efforts of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to fulfill the commitments of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan under the Joint Declaration between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the United States of America for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan, issued on February 29, 2020.”;
(2) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
“(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—In conducting the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall include each of the following:
“(A) The progress made by the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan toward increased accountability and the reduction of corruption within the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.
“(B) The extent to which the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan has designated the appropriate staff, prioritized the development of relevant processes, and provided or requested the allocation of resources necessary to support a peace and reconciliation process in Afghanistan.
“(C) The extent to which the capability and capacity of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces have improved as a result of Afghanistan Security Forces Fund investment, including through training, and an articulation of the metrics used to assess such improvements.
“(E) The distribution practices of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces and whether the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is ensuring that supplies, equipment, and weaponry supplied by the United States are appropriately distributed to, and employed by, security forces.
“(F) The progress made with respect to the recruitment, integration, retention, training, and treatment of women in the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces.
(3) by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows:
“(4) WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS FOR INSUFFICIENT PROGRESS.—
“(A) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than December 31, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and pursuant to the assessment under paragraph (1), shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification indicating whether the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan has made sufficient progress in the areas described in paragraph (2).
“(B) WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS.—If the Secretary of Defense is unable under subparagraph (A) to certify that the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is making sufficient progress in the areas described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall—
“(C) WAIVER.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that withholding such funds would impede the national security objectives of the United States by prohibiting, restricting, delaying, or otherwise limiting the provision of assistance to the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces for fiscal year 2021, the Secretary may waive the withholding requirement under subparagraph (B) if the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of State, certifies such determination to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days before the effective date of the waiver.”.
(a) Sense of Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate to commend the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, and the Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, for—
(b) Purposes.—Subsection (a) of section 1229 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (5 U.S.C. app. 8G note) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting after “To provide for” the following: “the transition to the lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel designated pursuant to section 8L(d) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. app. 8L(d)) of all duties, responsibilities, and authorities for serving”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(4) To maximize coordination between the Inspector General under this section and the lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel, including through transparency and timely sharing of data and information collected in relation to the exercise of their respective duties, responsibilities, and authorities, with emphasis on matters of significant overlap between the Department of State, the United States Agency for International Development, and the Department of Defense.”.
(c) Assistant Inspector General for Auditing.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended by striking “supported by” and inserting “funded with”.
(d) Supervision.—Subsection (e)(2) of such section is amended by inserting “authorized by this section” after “any audit or investigation”.
(e) Duties.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended—
(2) in paragraph (2)—
(3) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following new paragraph (4):
“(4) SCOPE OF DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—
“(A) NO EXTENSION TO PARTICULAR MATTERS.—The duties and responsibilities of the Inspector General under paragraphs (1) through (3) shall not extend to the following:
“(B) ASSIGNMENT OF DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SUCH MATTERS.—Duties and responsibilities of inspectors general with respect to operations and activities and contracts specified in subparagraph (A) shall be discharged by the lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel designated pursuant to section 8L(d) of the Inspector General Act of 1978.”.
(f) Responsibility for coordination of efforts vested in lead IG for Operation Freedom's Sentinel.—Such section is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection (g):
“(g) Coordination and deconfliction of efforts.—
“(1) COORDINATION AND DECONFLICTION THROUGH LEAD IG FOR OPERATION FREEDOM'S SENTINEL.—The lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel designated pursuant to section 8L(d) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 shall exercise all duties, responsibilities, and authorities for the coordination and deconfliction of inspector general activities in or in regard to Afghanistan.
“(2) COORDINATION IN DISCHARGE.—In carrying out duties, responsibilities, and authorities under paragraph (1), the lead Inspector General referred to in that paragraph shall coordinate with, receive the cooperation of, and be responsible for deconfliction among, the following:
“(A) Each Inspector General specified in section 8L(c) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 who is not the lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel.
(g) Assistance from Federal agencies.—Subsection (i) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (f)(1) of this section, is amended—
(h) Reports.—Subsection (j) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (f)(1) of this section, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(A) by striking the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new matter:
“(1) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after the end of the second quarter of each fiscal year, and not later than 30 days after the end of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, the Inspector General shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth a summary, for the two fiscal year quarters ending before the date on which such report is required to be submitted, of the activities of the Inspector General and the activities under programs and operations funded with amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for the reconstruction of Afghanistan. Each report shall include, for the period covered by such report, the following:”;
(i) Report coordination.—Subsection (k) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (f)(1) of this section, is amended—
(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting “by Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel” after “Report coordination”;
(j) Funds subject to oversight responsibility.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (n) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (f)(1) of this section, is amended to read as follows:
“(1) AMOUNTS APPROPRIATED OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF AFGHANISTAN.—The term ‘amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for the reconstruction of Afghanistan’ means amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the reconstruction of Afghanistan under either of the following:
(k) Termination.—Subsection (p) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (f)(1) of this section, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs.
“(2) ASSUMPTION OF DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND AUTHORITIES IN TERMINATION.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Effective as of the date provided for in subparagraph (B), the duties, responsibilities, and authorities of the Inspector General under this section shall be discharged by the lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel designated pursuant to subsection (d) of section 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978.
“(B) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The effective date provided for in this subparagraph shall be such date after the date of the termination of the Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction pursuant to paragraph (1) as the Chair of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency under subsection (a) of section 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978 shall specify, which date may not be more than 180 days after the date of such termination.
“(3) FINAL REPORT.—The final report of the Inspector General under this section shall consist of the semi-annual report required by subsection (j)(1) for the last two fiscal year quarters ending before the date of the termination of the Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction pursuant to paragraph (1).”.
(l) Conforming and technical amendments.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), such section is further amended as follows:
(2) EFFECTIVE DATES.—The amendments made by subparagraphs (A), (D) and (E) of paragraph (1) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. The amendment made by subparagraphs (B) and (C) of that paragraph shall take effect on the effective date provided for in section 1229(p)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, as redesignated by subsection (f)(1) and amended by subsection (k).
(m) Conforming amendment to other law.—Section 842(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 234; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) Upon the assumption by the lead Inspector General for Operation Freedom's Sentinel designated pursuant to section 8L(d) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. app. 8L(d)) of duties, responsibilities, and authorities under section 1229 of this Act, as provided for in subsection (p)(2) of such section 1229, the requirement in paragraph (1) to perform audits as required by subsection (a) with respect to Afghanistan shall be discharged by such lead Inspector General.”.
(a) In general.—Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, consistent with the timescale applicable to joint urgent operational needs statements, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) prioritize and rank order the mission elements, platforms, and weapons systems most critical for the operational plans of the combatant commands;
(b) Plan.—
(c) Coordination.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall consult with the National Security Council, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Transportation, and the head of any other relevant Federal department or agency to enable civilian and commercial adoption of technologies and capabilities for resilient and survivable alternative positioning, navigation, and timing capabilities to complement the global positioning system.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall establish a program to develop technologies and systems to enhance phase three National Security Space Launch requirements and enable further advances in launch capability associated with the insertion of national security payloads into relevant classes of orbits.
(b) Duration.—The duration of a project to develop technologies and systems selected under the program shall be not more than three years.
Not later than 540 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force selects two National Security Space Launch providers in accordance with the phase two acquisition strategy for the National Security Space Launch program, the Secretary of Defense shall complete the nonrecurring design validation of previously flown launch hardware for National Security Space Launch providers that offer such hardware for use in the phase two acquisition strategy or other national security space missions.
The Secretary of the Air Force shall implement a tactically responsive space launch program—
(1) to provide long-term continuity for tactically responsive space launch operations across the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code;
(a) Certifications regarding integrated tactical warning and attack assessment mission of the Air Force.—Section 1666(a) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 113 Stat. 2617) is amended by striking “Strategic Command” and inserting “Space Command”.
(b) Council on oversight of the Department of Defense positioning, navigation, and timing enterprise.—Section 2279b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(c) Joint interagency combined space operations center.—Section 605(e) of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 115–31; 131 Stat. 832) is amended—
(d) National security space satellite reporting policy.—Section 2278(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Strategic Command” and inserting “Space Command”.
(e) Space-based infrared system and advanced extremely high frequency program.—Section 1612(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2590) is amended by striking “Strategic Command” and inserting “Space Command”.
(a) Development.—The Director of the Space Development Agency shall lead—
(b) Organization.—On October 1, 2022, or earlier if directed by the Secretary of Defense, the Space Development Agency shall be transferred from the Office of the Secretary of Defense to the United States Space Force and shall maintain the same organizational reporting requirements and acquisition authorities as the Space Rapid Capability Office.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and biennially thereafter for the following five-year period, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment that includes—
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to Congress a report on the impact of the acquisition strategy for the National Security Space Launch program on the potential for foreign countries, including the People's Republic of China, to enter the global commercial space launch market.
(a) In general.—In acquiring geospatial-intelligence, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of the National Reconnaissance Office and the Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, shall leverage, to the maximum extent practicable, the capabilities of United States industry, including through the use of commercial geospatial-intelligence services and acquisition of commercial satellite imagery.
(b) Obtaining future geospatial-intelligence data.—The Director of the National Reconnaissance Office, as part of an analysis of alternatives for the future acquisition of space systems for geospatial-intelligence, shall—
(1) consider whether there is a suitable, cost-effective, commercial capability available that can meet any or all of the geospatial-intelligence requirements of the Department and the intelligence community;
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) The term “intelligence community” has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(a) In general.—Subsection (c) of section 932 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) is amended to read as follows:
“(c) Principal Cyber Advisor.—
“(1) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall designate a Principal Cyber Advisor from among those civilian officials of the Department of Defense who have been appointed to the positions in which they serve by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
“(2) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Principal Cyber Advisor shall be responsible for the following:
“(B) Overall integration of Cyber Operations Forces activities relating to cyberspace operations, including associated policy and operational considerations, resources, personnel, technology development and transition, and acquisition.
“(C) Assessing and overseeing the implementation of the cyber strategy of the Department and execution of the cyber posture review of the Department on behalf of the Secretary.
“(D) Coordinating activities pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(3) with the Principal Information Operations Advisor, the Chief Information Officer of the Department, and other officials as determined by the Secretary of Defense, to ensure the integration of activities in support of cyber, information, and electromagnetic spectrum operations.
“(3) CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM.—Consistent with section 911 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 111 note), the Principal Cyber Advisor shall—
“(A) integrate the cyber expertise and perspectives of appropriate organizations within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Staff, military departments, the Defense Agencies and Field Activities, and combatant commands, by establishing and maintaining a full-time cross-functional team of subject matter experts from those organizations; and
(b) Designation of Deputy Principal Cyber Advisor.—Section 905(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Policy” and inserting “Secretary of Defense”.
(a) Framework required.—Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a standard, comprehensive framework to enhance the consistency, execution, and effectiveness of cyber hunt forward operations.
(b) Elements.—The framework developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Identification of the selection criteria for proposed hunt forward operations, including specification of necessary thresholds for the justification of operations and thresholds for partner cooperation.
(2) The roles and responsibilities of the following organizations in the support of the planning and execution of hunt forward operations:
(3) Pre-deployment planning guidelines to maximize the operational success of each unique operation, including guidance that takes into account the highly variable nature of the following aspects at the tactical level:
(4) Metrics to measure the effectiveness of each operation, including means to evaluate the value of discovered malware and infrastructure, the effect on the adversary, and the potential for future engagements with the partner country.
(c) Briefing.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on the framework developed pursuant to subsection (a).
Subsection (c) of section 395 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(c) Sensitive Military Cyber Operation defined.— (1) In this section, the term ‘sensitive military cyber operation’ means an action described in paragraph (2) that—
“(B) is intended to achieve a cyber effect against a foreign terrorist organization or a country, including its armed forces and the proxy forces of that country located elsewhere —
“(i) with which the armed forces of the United States are not involved in hostilities (as that term is used in section 4 of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1543)); or
Section 484 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the following new subsections:
“(a) Briefings required.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Commander of United States Cyber Command, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or designees from each of their offices, shall provide to the congressional defense committees quarterly briefings on all offensive and significant defensive military operations in cyberspace, including clandestine cyber activities, carried out by the Department of Defense during the immediately preceding quarter.
“(b) Elements.—Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the military operations in cyberspace described in such subsection, the following:
“(1) An update, set forth separately for each applicable geographic and functional command, that describes the operations carried out in the area of operations of that command or by that command.
“(2) An update, set forth for each applicable geographic and functional command, that describes defensive cyber operations executed to protect or defend forces, networks, and equipment in the area of operations of that command.
“(3) An update on relevant authorities and legal issues applicable to operations, including any presidential directives and delegations of authority received since the last quarterly update.
“(4) An overview of critical operational challenges posed by major adversaries or encountered in operational activities conducted since the last quarterly update.
(a) Review required.—The Commander of United States Cyber Command, with support from the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, the Chief Data Officer of the Department, the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Director of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation, shall conduct a review of the Cybersecurity Service Provider and Cyber Mission Force enterprises.
(b) Assessment and identification of redundancies and gaps.—The review required by subsection (a) shall assess and identify—
(1) the optimal way to integrate the Joint Cyber Warfighting Architecture and the Cybersecurity Service Provider architectures, associated tools and capabilities, and associated concepts of operations;
(3) where integration, collaboration, and interoperability are not occurring that would improve outcomes;
(4) baseline training, capabilities, competencies, operational responsibilities, and joint concepts of operations for the Joint Force Headquarters for the Department of Defense Information Network, Cybersecurity Service Providers, and Cyber Protection Teams;
(5) the roles and responsibilities of the Principal Cyber Advisor, Chief Information Officer, and the Commander of United States Cyber Command in establishing and overseeing the baselines assessed and identified under paragraph (4);
(6) the optimal command structure for the military services’ and combatant commands’ cybersecurity service providers and cyber protection teams;
(c) Recommendations for fiscal year 2023 budget.—The Chief Information Officer, the Chief Data Officer, the Commander of United States Cyber Command, and the Principal Cyber Advisor shall jointly develop recommendations for the Secretary of Defense in preparation of the budget justification materials to be submitted to Congress in support of the budget for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2023 (as submitted with the budget of the President for such fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code).
(d) Progress briefing.—Not later than March 31, 2021, the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Data Officer, the Commander of United States Cyber Command, and the Principal Cyber Advisor shall jointly provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the progress made in carrying out this section.
Section 807 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) is amended—
(a) Assessment.—Not later than November 1, 2021, the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense and the Commander of United States Cyber Command shall jointly, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, conduct and complete an assessment on the operational planning and deconfliction policies and processes that govern cyber operations of the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include evaluations as to whether—
(1) the joint targeting cycle and relevant operational and targeting databases are suitable for the conduct of timely and well-coordinated cyber operations;
(2) each of the policies and processes in effect to facilitate technical, operational, and capability deconfliction are appropriate for the conduct of timely and effective cyber operations;
(3) intelligence gain-loss decisions made by Cyber Command are sufficiently well-informed and made in timely fashion;
(c) Briefing.—Not later than February 1, 2022, the Principal Cyber Advisor and the Commander of United States Cyber Command shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on the findings of the assessment completed under subsection (a), including discussion of planned policy and process changes, if any, relevant to cyber operations.
(a) Pilot program required.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense and the Commander of United States Cyber Command, shall conduct a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of developing and using speed-based metrics to measure the performance and effectiveness of security operations centers and cyber security service providers in the Department of Defense.
(b) Requirements.—
(1) DEVELOPMENT OF METRICS.— (A) Not later than July 1, 2021, the Chief Information Officer and the Commander shall jointly develop metrics described in subsection (a) to carry out the pilot program under such subsection.
(2) USE OF METRICS.— (A) Not later than December 1, 2021, the Secretary shall, in carrying out the pilot program required by subsection (a), begin using the metrics developed under paragraph (1) of this subsection to assess select security operations centers and cyber security service providers, which the Secretary shall select specifically for purposes of the pilot program, for a period of not less than four months.
(c) Authorities.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary may—
(1) assess select security operations centers and cyber security service providers—
(B) in the testing and accreditation of cybersecurity products and services on test networks designated pursuant to section 1658 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92); and
(d) Briefing.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2022, the Secretary shall brief the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on the findings of the Secretary with respect to the pilot program required by subsection (a).
(2) ELEMENTS.—The briefing provided under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(B) The findings of the Secretary with respect to the assessments carried out under subsection (b)(2).
(C) An analysis of the utility of speed-based metrics in assessing security operations centers and cyber security service providers.
(a) In general.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall conduct comprehensive assessments as follows:
(1) TIMING VARIABILITY IN DEPARTMENT NETWORKS.—The Chief Information Officer shall characterize—
(A) timing variability across Department information technology and operational technology networks, appliances, devices, applications, and sensors that generate time-stamped data and metadata used for cybersecurity purposes;
(2) USE OF NETWORK ADDRESS TRANSLATION.—The Chief Information Officer shall characterize—
(A) why and how the Department is using Network Address Translation (NAT) and multiple layers and nesting of Network Address Translation;
(a) Prohibition.—The Secretary of Defense may not eliminate, divest, downsize, or reorganize the College of Information and Cyberspace of the National Defense University, or seek to reduce the number of students educated at the College, until 30 days after the date on which the congressional defense committees receive the report required by subsection (c).
(b) Assessment, determination, and review.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, the Principal Cyber Advisor, the Principal Information Operations Advisor of the Department of Defense, the Chief Information Officer of the Department, the Chief Financial Officer of the Department, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Commander of United States Cyber Command, shall—
(1) assess requirements for joint professional military education and civilian leader education in the information environment and cyberspace domain to support the Department and other national security institutions of the Federal Government;
(2) determine whether the importance, challenges, and complexity of the modern information environment and cyberspace domain warrant—
(3) review the plan proposed by the National Defense University for eliminating the College of Information and Cyberspace and reducing and restructuring the information and cyberspace faculty, course offerings, joint professional military education and degree and certificate programs, and other services provided by the College; and
Section 167b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Integration of plans, capabilities, and systems.—The Secretary of Defense shall integrate the plans, capabilities, and systems for user activity monitoring, and the plans, capabilities, and systems for endpoint cybersecurity and the collection of metadata on network activity for cybersecurity to enable mutual support and information sharing.
(b) Requirements.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1) consider using the Big Data Platform instances that host cybersecurity metadata for storage and analysis of all user activity monitoring data collected across the Department of Defense Information Network at all security classification levels;
(a) Plan required.—Not later than February 1, 2021, the Principal Cyber Advisor of the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, and the Commander of United States Cyber Command, shall develop a comprehensive plan for the deployment of commercial-off-the-shelf solutions on supplier networks to monitor the public-facing Internet attack surface in the defense industrial base.
(b) Contents.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Definition of an architecture, concept of operations, and governance structure that—
(A) will allow for the instrumentation and collection of cybersecurity data on the public-facing Internet attack surfaces of defense industrial base contractors in a manner that is compatible with the Department’s existing or future capabilities for analysis, and instrumentation and collection, as appropriate, of cybersecurity data within the Department of Defense Information Network;
(c) Consultation.—In developing the plan required by subsection (a), the Principal Cyber Advisor shall ensure that extensive consultation with representative companies of the defense industrial base occurs so as to ensure that prospective participants in the defense industrial base understand and agree that emerging solutions are acceptable, practical, and effective.
Section 1652 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), as amended by section 1639 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(1)(B)—
(2) in subsection (d)(2), by striking “Seven members shall” and inserting “Seven members, during the period beginning on the date of the establishment of the Commission and ending on the day before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, and six members, during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of such Act and ending on the date of the termination of the Commission, shall”;
(3) in subsection (i)(1)(B)—
(A) by striking “Members of the Commission who” inserting “(i) During the period beginning on the date of the establishment of the Commission and ending on the day before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, members of the Commission who”; and
(4) in subsection (k)(2)—
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking “120 day period” and inserting “16 month period with no further extensions permitted”;
(B) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows:
“(B) The Commission may use the 16 month period referred to in subparagraph (A) for the purposes of—
“(i) collecting and assessing comments and feedback from the Federal departments and agencies, as well as published reviews, on the analysis and recommendations contained in the final report under paragraph (1);
“(C) During the 16 month period referred to in subparagraph (A), the Commission shall—
“(i) provide, in such manner and format as the Commission considers appropriate, an annual update on such report and any revisions or amendments reached by the Commission under subparagraph (B)(iv) to—
“(I) the Committee on Armed Services, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate;
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(D) In the event that the Commission is extended, and the effective date of the extension comes after the time set for the Commission’s termination, the Commission shall be deemed reconstituted with the same members and powers that existed at the time of termination of the Commission, except that—
“(i) a member of the Commission shall only serve if the member’s position continues to be authorized under subsection (b);
“(ii) no compensation or entitlements relating to a person’s status with the Commission shall be due for the period between the termination and reconstitution of the Commission;
“(iii) nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed as requiring the extension or reemployment of any staff member or contractor working for the Commission;
“(v) any unexpended funds made available for the use of the Commission shall continue to be available for use for the life of the Commission, as well as any additional funds appropriated to the Department of Defense that are made available to the Commission, provided that the total such funds does not exceed $1,000,000 from the reconstitution of the Commission to the completion of the Commission; and
(a) In general.—Not later than December 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall—
(1) review and, if the Secretary determines necessary, update regulations promulgated under section 903 of title 32, United States Code, to clarify when and under what conditions the participation of the National Guard in a response to a cyber attack qualifies as a homeland defense activity that would be compensated for by the Secretary of Defense under section 902 of such title; and
(2) promulgate guidance on how units of the National Guard shall collaborate with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation through multi-agency task forces, information-sharing groups, incident response planning and exercises, State fusion centers, and other relevant forums and activities.
(b) Annex of National Cyber Incident Response Plan.—Not later than December 31, 2021, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall develop an annex to the National Cyber Incident Response Plan that details those regulations and guidance reviewed, updated, and promulgated under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
Section 1644(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91), as amended by section 1635 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended—
(3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
“(3) A review of the law, policies, and authorities relating to, and necessary for, the United States to maintain a safe, reliable, and credible cyber posture for defending against and responding to cyber attacks and for deterrence in cyberspace, including the following:
(4) in paragraph (4), by striking “A declaratory” and inserting “A review of the need for or for updates to a declaratory”;
(6) by amending paragraph (6) to read as follows:
“(6) A review of a strategy to deter, degrade, or defeat malicious cyber activity targeting the United States (which may include activities, capability development, and operations other than cyber activities, cyber capability development, and cyber operations), including—
“(A) a review and assessment of various approaches to competition and deterrence in cyberspace, determined in consultation with experts from Government, academia, and industry;
(7) by striking paragraph (8) and inserting the following new paragraph (8):
“(8) A comprehensive force structure assessment of the Cyber Operations Forces of the Department for the posture review period, including the following:
“(A) A determination of the appropriate size and composition of the Cyber Mission Forces to accomplish the mission requirements of the Department.
(8) by redesignating paragraphs (9) through (11) as subsections (12) through (15), respectively; and
(9) by inserting after paragraph (8), the following new paragraphs:
“(9) An assessment of whether the Cyber Mission Force has the appropriate level of interoperability, integration, and interdependence with special operations and conventional forces.
(a) In general.—Not later than January 15, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the actions the Secretary will undertake to implement clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 167b(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, including actions to ensure that the Commander of United States Cyber Command has enhanced authority, direction, and control of the Cyber Operations Forces and the equipment budget that enables Cyber Operations Forces' operations and readiness, beginning with the budget to be submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2024, and the budget justification materials for the Department of Defense to be submitted to Congress in support of such budget.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall address the following items:
(1) The procedures by which the Principal Cyber Advisor (PCA) will exercise authority, direction, and oversight over the Commander of United States Cyber Command, with respect to Cyber Operations Forces-peculiar equipment and resources.
(2) The procedures by which the Commander of United States Cyber Command will—
(3) Recommendations for actions to enable the Commander of United States Cyber Command to execute the budget and acquisition responsibilities of the Commander in excess of currently imposed limits on the Cyber Operations Procurement Fund, including potential increases in personnel to support the Commander.
(a) Evaluation required.—Not later than December 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct an evaluation of options for establishing a cyber reserve force.
(b) Elements.—The evaluation conducted under subsection (a) shall include assessment of the following:
(1) The capabilities and deficiencies in military and civilian personnel with needed cybersecurity expertise, and the quantity of personnel with such expertise, within the Department.
(2) The potential for a uniformed, civilian, or mixed cyber reserve force to remedy shortfalls in expertise and capacity.
(3) The ability of the Department to attract the personnel with the desired expertise to either a uniformed or civilian cyber reserve force.
(4) The number of personnel, the level of funding, and the composition of a cyber reserve force that would be required to meet the needs of the Department.
(5) Alternative models for establishing a cyber reserve force, including the following:
(a) Plan for implementation of findings and recommendations from first annual assessment of cyber resiliency of nuclear command and control system.—Not later than October 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a comprehensive plan, including a schedule and resourcing plan, for the implementation of the findings and recommendations included in the first report submitted under section 499(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Concept of operations and oversight mechanism for cyber defense of nuclear command and control system.—Not later than October 1, 2021, the Secretary shall develop and establish—
(1) a concept of operations for defending the nuclear command and control system against cyber attacks, including specification of the—
(2) an oversight mechanism or governance model for overseeing the implementation of the concept of operations developed and established under paragraph (1), related development, systems engineering, and acquisition activities and programs, and the plan required by subsection (a), including specification of the—
(A) roles and responsibilities of relevant entities within the Office of the Secretary, the military services, combatant commands, the Defense Agencies, and the Department of Defense Field Activities in overseeing the defense of the nuclear command and control system against cyber attacks;
(a) Evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems of the Department of Defense.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1647 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92), as amended by section 1633 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(i) Establishing requirements for periodicity of vulnerability reviews.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish policies and requirements for each major weapon system, and the priority critical infrastructure essential to the proper functioning of major weapon systems in broader mission areas, to be re-assessed for cyber vulnerabilities, taking into account upgrades or other modifications to systems and changes in the threat.
(b) Strategic Cybersecurity Program.—Section 1640 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note), is amended by striking subsections (a) through (e) and inserting the following new subsections:
“(a) In general.—Not later than August 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall, acting through the Director of the National Security Agency and in coordination with the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, establish a program to be known as the ‘Strategic Cybersecurity Program’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Program’).
“(b) Elements.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Program shall be comprised of personnel assigned to the Program by the Secretary from among personnel, including regular and reserve members of the Armed Forces, civilian employees of the Department of Defense (including the Defense intelligence agencies), and personnel of the research laboratories of the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy, who have particular expertise in the areas of responsibility described in subsection (c).
“(c) Responsibilities.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Program manager and the personnel assigned to the Program shall improve the end-to-end cybersecurity of all of the systems, critical infrastructure, kill chains, and processes that make up the following military missions of the Department of Defense:
“(2) ASSESSING AND REMEDIATING VULNERABILITIES IN MISSION EXECUTION.—In carrying out the activities described in paragraph (1), the Program manager shall conduct end-to-end vulnerability assessments and undertake or oversee remediation of identified vulnerabilities in the systems and processes on which the successful execution of the missions delineated in paragraph (1) depend.
“(3) ACQUISITION AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING REVIEW.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Program manager shall conduct appropriate reviews of acquisition and systems engineering plans for proposed systems and infrastructure. The review of an acquisition plan for any proposed system or infrastructure shall be carried out before Milestone B approval for such system or infrastructure.
“(d) Integration with other efforts.—The Secretary shall ensure that the Program builds upon, and does not duplicate, other efforts of the Department of Defense relating to cybersecurity, including the following:
“(1) The evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems of the Department of Defense required under section 1647 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92).
“(2) The evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of Department of Defense critical infrastructure required under section 1650 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note).
“(e) Mission definition.—The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall coordinate with the Director of the National Security Agency and the commanders of the unified combatant commands to define the elements of the missions that will be included in the Program, and shall be responsible for updating those definitions as necessary.
(a) Defense industrial base threat intelligence program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a threat intelligence sharing program to share threat intelligence with, and obtain threat intelligence from, the defense industrial base.
(2) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS.—At a minimum, the Secretary shall ensure that the program established pursuant to paragraph (1) includes the following:
(A) Cybersecurity incident reporting requirements applicable to the defense industrial base that—
(i) extend beyond mandatory incident reporting requirements in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act;
(iii) establishes a single clearinghouse for all mandatory incident reporting to the Department of Defense, including incidents involving covered unclassified information, and classified information; and
(iv) provide that, unless authorized or required by another provision of law or the element of the defense industrial base making the report consents, nonpublic information of which the Department becomes aware only because of a report provided pursuant to the program shall be disseminated and used only for a cybersecurity purpose, as defined in section 102 of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (6 U.S.C. 1501).
(b) Threat intelligence program participation.—
(1) PROCUREMENT.—The Secretary either may require or shall encourage and provide incentive for companies to participate in the threat intelligence sharing program required by subsection (a).
(c) Existing information sharing programs.—The Secretary may utilize an existing Department information sharing program to satisfy the requirement in subsection (a) if—
(d) Regulations.—
(1) RULEMAKING AUTHORITY.—Not later than December 15, 2021, the Secretary shall promulgate such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out this section.
(2) CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM HARMONIZATION.—The Secretary shall ensure that any intelligence sharing requirements set forth in the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to paragraph (1) consider an entity’s maturity and role within the defense industrial base, consistent with the maturity certification levels established in the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program of the Department.
(e) Community consent.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—As part of the program established pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary either may require through contractual mechanisms or shall encourage entities in the defense industrial base to consent to queries of foreign intelligence collection databases related to the entities, provided that intelligence information provided to companies is handled in a manner that protects sources and methods.
(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require that the elements of the intelligence community conduct queries on defense industrial base companies to detect cybersecurity threats to such companies or to require that information resulting from such queries be provided to such companies.
(f) Report required.—Not later than March 1, 2022, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a description of—
(g) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “defense industrial base” means the Department of Defense, Federal Government, and private sector worldwide industrial complex with capabilities to perform research and development, design, produce, and maintain military weapon systems, subsystems, components, or parts to satisfy military requirements.
(2) The term “intelligence community” has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(a) Assessment required.—Not later than December 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall complete an assessment of—
(b) Elements.—The assessment completed under section (a) shall include evaluation of the following:
(1) The adequacy of the requirements at each level of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, including requirements germane to continuous monitoring, discovery, and investigation of anomalous activity indicative of a cybersecurity incident.
(2) The need for the establishment of a continuous threat-hunting operational model, as a supplement to the cyber hygiene requirements of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, in which network activity is comprehensively and continuously monitored for signs of compromise.
(c) Briefing.—Not later than February 1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on—
(a) Comprehensive assessment and recommendations required.—Not later than December 31, 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) complete a comprehensive assessment of the current and potential threats and risks posed by quantum computing technologies to critical national security systems, including—
(a) In general.—Section 1651 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(b) Briefing.—Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary of the Navy, the program manager of the Unified Platform program, the Chief Information Officer, and the Principal Cyber Advisor shall jointly brief the congressional defense committees on the compliance of the Department of the Navy with the requirements of such section, as amended by paragraph (1).
Section 391(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
“(3) ARMED FORCES ASSISTANCE AND ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT AND INFORMATION BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
“(A) include mechanisms for a member of the armed forces—
“(B) provide that an operationally critical contractor is only required to provide access to equipment or information as described in subparagraph (A) to determine whether—
(a) Baseline review.—Not later than October 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall undertake a baseline review of the Joint Regional Security Stacks (JRSS) to determine whether the activity—
(1) should proceed as a program of record, with modifications as specified in section (b), for exclusively the Non-Classified Internet Protocol Network (NIPRNET) or for such network and the Secret Internet Protocol Network (SIPRNET); or
(2) should be phased out across the Department of Defense with each of the Joint Regional Security Stacks replaced through the institution of cost-effective and capable networking and cybersecurity technologies, architectures, and operational concepts within five years of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Plan to transition to program of record.—If the Secretary determines under subsection (a) that the Joint Regional Security Stacks activity should proceed, not later than October 1, 2021, the Secretary shall develop a plan to transition such activity to a program of record, governed by standard Department of Defense acquisition program requirements and practices, including the following:
(3) A program office and responsible program manager, under the oversight of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, responsible for pertinent doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, facilities and policy matters, and the development of effective tactics, techniques, and procedures;
(c) Limitations.—
(a) Assessment.—Not later than December 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall seek to enter into an agreement with an independent organization with relevant expertise in cyber policy and governmental organization to conduct and complete an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing a National Cyber Director.
(b) Elements.—The assessment required under subsection (a) shall include a review of and development of recommendations germane to the following, including the development of proposed legislative text for the establishment of a National Cyber Director:
(1) The authorities necessary to bring capabilities and capacities together across the interagency, all levels of government, and the private sector.
(2) A definition of the roles of the National Cyber Director in planning, preparing, and directing integrated cyber operations in response to a major cyber attack on the United States, including intelligence operations, law enforcement actions, cyber effects operations, defensive operations, and incident response operations.
(c) Report.—
(a) In general.—Section 1640 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(2) in subsection (a)—
(a) Personnel management authority for Commander of United States Cyber Command to attract experts in science and engineering.—Section 1599h of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 212 of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92)), is further amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
“(7) UNITED STATES CYBER COMMAND.—The Commander of United States Cyber Command may carry out a program of personnel management authority provided in subsection (b) in order to facilitate the recruitment of eminent experts in computer science, data science, engineering, mathematics, and computer network exploitation within the headquarters of United States Cyber Command and the Cyber National Mission Force.”; and
(b) Program to develop accesses, discover vulnerabilities, and engineer cyber tools and develop tactics, techniques, and procedures for offensive cyber operations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to the authority provided under section 1599h(a)(7) of such title, as added by subsection (a), the Commander of United States Cyber Command shall establish a program or augment an existing program within the Command to develop accesses, discover vulnerabilities, and engineer cyber tools and develop tactics, techniques, and procedures for the use of these assets and capabilities in offensive cyber operations.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The program or augmented program required by paragraph (1) shall—
(A) develop accesses, tools, vulnerabilities, and tactics, techniques, and procedures fit for Department of Defense military operations in cyberspace, such as reliability, meeting short development and operational timelines, low cost, and expendability;
(B) aim to decrease the reliance of Cyber Command on accesses, tools, and expertise provided by the intelligence community;
(C) be designed to provide technical and operational expertise on par with that of programs of the intelligence community;
(3) INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “intelligence community” has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 by section 301 for operation and maintenance and available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for the travel of persons as specified in the table in section 4301—
(1) not more than 25 percent shall be available until the date on which the report required by subsection (h)(1) of section 1631 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is submitted to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives; and
Section 1640 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2310; 10 U.S.C. 2200 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(g) Report to Congress.—Not later than September 30, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the effectiveness of the Cyber Institutes and on opportunities to expand the Cyber Institutes to additional select institutions of higher learning that have a Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program.”.
(a) In general.—Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, may award financial assistance to a Center for the purpose of providing cybersecurity services to small manufacturers.
(b) Criteria.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Director, shall establish and publish on the grants.gov website, or successor website, criteria for selecting recipients for financial assistance under this section.
(c) Use of financial assistance.—Financial assistance under this section—
(1) shall be used by a Center to provide small manufacturers with cybersecurity services relating to—
(d) Biennial reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not less frequently than once every two years, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a biennial report on financial assistance awarded under this section.
(e) Termination.—The authority of the Secretary to award of financial assistance under this section shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “Center” has the meaning given such term in section 25(a) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278k(a)).
(2) The term “small manufacturer” has the meaning given that term in section 1644(g) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note).
(a) Study required.—Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall complete a study on the cyberexploitation of the personal information and accounts of members of the Armed Forces and their families.
(b) Elements.—The study required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An intelligence assessment of the threat currently posed by foreign government and non-state actor cyberexploitation of members of the Armed Forces and their families, including generalized assessments as to whether cyberexploitation of members of the Armed Forces and their families is a substantial threat as compared to other means of information warfare and as to whether cyberexploitation of members of the Armed Forces and their families is an increasing threat.
(2) Case-study analysis of three known occurrences of attempted cyberexploitation against members of the Armed Forces and their families, including assessments of the vulnerability and the ultimate consequences of the attempted cyberexploitation.
(3) A description of the actions taken by the Department of Defense to educate members of the Armed Forces and their families, including particularly vulnerable subpopulations, about any actions that can be taken to reduce these threats.
(4) An intelligence assessment of the threat posed by foreign government and non-state actor creation and use of deep fakes featuring members of the Armed Forces or their families, including generalized assessments of the maturity of the technology used in the creation of deep fakes and as to how deep fakes have been used or might be used to conduct information warfare.
(c) Report.—
Section 179(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Paragraph (11) of section 179(d) of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by section 1651, is further amended to read as follows:
“(11) As part of the planning, programming, budgeting, and execution process of the National Nuclear Security Administration—
“(A) providing guidance with respect to the development of the annual budget proposals of the Administration under section 3255 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act;
“(B) reviewing the adequacy of such proposals under section 4717 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act; and
Section 492a(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the following, and the Department may not otherwise take any action to do the following:
It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) continues to play an essential role in the national security of the United States and the independent nuclear deterrents of other NATO members, such as the United Kingdom, have helped underwrite peace and security;
(2) the nuclear programs of the United States and the United Kingdom have enjoyed significant collaborative benefits as a result of the cooperative relationship formalized in the Agreement for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes, signed at Washington July 3, 1958, and entered into force August 4, 1958 (9 UST 1028), between the United States and the United Kingdom (commonly referred to as the “Mutual Defense Agreement”);
(3) the unique partnership between the United States and the United Kingdom has enhanced sovereign military and scientific capabilities, strengthened bilateral ties, and shared costs, particularly on such programs as the Trident II D–5 weapons system and the common missile compartment for the future Dreadnought and Columbia classes of submarines;
(4) additionally, the extension of the nuclear deterrence commitments of the United Kingdom to members of the NATO alliance strengthens collective security while reducing the burden placed on United States nuclear forces to deter potential adversaries and assure allies of the United States and the United Kingdom;
(5) as the international security environment deteriorates and potential adversaries expand and enhance their nuclear forces, the extended deterrence commitments of the United Kingdom play an increasingly important role in supporting the security interests of the United States and allies of the United States and the United Kingdom;
(6) it is in the national security interest of the United States to support the United Kingdom with respect to the decision of the Government of the United Kingdom to maintain its nuclear deterrent until global security conditions warrant its elimination;
(7) as the United States must modernize its aging nuclear forces to ensure its ability to continue to field a nuclear deterrent that is safe, secure, and effective, the United Kingdom faces a similar challenge;
(8) bilateral cooperation on the parallel development of the W93/Mk7 warhead of the United States and the replacement warhead of the United Kingdom, as well as associated components, will allow the United States and the United Kingdom to responsibly address challenges within their legacy nuclear forces in a cost-effective manner that—
(9) continued cooperation between the nuclear programs of United States and the United Kingdom, including through the W93/Mk7 program, is essential to ensuring that the NATO alliance continues to be supported by credible nuclear forces capable of preserving peace, preventing coercion, and deterring aggression.
(a) Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system.—
(1) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $73,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure components for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system through co-production of such components in the United States by industry of the United States.
(2) CONDITIONS.—
(A) AGREEMENT.—Funds described in paragraph (1) for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms and conditions in the Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement, signed on March 5, 2014, as amended to include co-production for Tamir interceptors.
(B) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in paragraph (1), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees—
(i) a certification that the amended bilateral international agreement specified in subparagraph (A) is being implemented as provided in such agreement;
(iii) for system improvements resulting in modified Iron Dome components and Tamir interceptor sub-components, a certification that the Government of Israel has demonstrated successful completion of Production Readiness Reviews, including the validation of production lines, the verification of component conformance, and the verification of performance to specification as defined in the Iron Dome Defense System Procurement Agreement, as further amended.
(b) Israeli cooperative missile defense program, David's Sling Weapon System co-production.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency not more than $50,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the David's Sling Weapon System, including for co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry.
(2) AGREEMENT.—Provision of funds specified in paragraph (1) shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the bilateral co-production agreement, including—
(3) CERTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees—
(A) a certification that the Government of Israel has demonstrated the successful completion of the knowledge points, technical milestones, and production readiness reviews required by the research, development, and technology agreement and the bilateral co-production agreement for the David's Sling Weapon System; and
(c) Israeli cooperative missile defense program, Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program co-production.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency not more than $77,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program, including for co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry.
(2) CERTIFICATION.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a certification that—
(A) the Government of Israel has demonstrated the successful completion of the knowledge points, technical milestones, and production readiness reviews required by the research, development, and technology agreement for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program;
(B) funds specified in paragraph (1) will be provided on the basis of a one-for-one cash match made by Israel or in another matching amount that otherwise meets best efforts (as mutually agreed to by the United States and Israel);
(C) the United States has entered into a bilateral international agreement with Israel that establishes, with respect to the use of such funds—
(i) in accordance with subparagraph (D), the terms of co-production of parts and components on the basis of the greatest practicable co-production of parts, components, and all-up rounds (if appropriate) by United States industry and minimizes nonrecurring engineering and facilitization expenses to the costs needed for co-production;
(d) Number.—In carrying out paragraph (2) of subsection (b) and paragraph (2) of subsection (c), the Under Secretary may submit—
(e) Timing.—The Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the certification and assessment under subsection (b)(3) and the certification under subsection (c)(2) no later than 30 days before the funds specified in paragraph (1) of subsections (b) and (c) for the respective system covered by the certification are provided to the Government of Israel.
(a) Primary responsibility for development and deployment of hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor payload.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall—
(2) TRANSITION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees—
(b) Certification regarding funding of hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—At the same time that the President submits to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the annual budget request of the President for fiscal year 2022, the Under Secretary of Defense Comptroller and the Director for Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a certification as to whether the hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor program is sufficiently funded in the future-years defense program.
(2) FUNDING LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 under the Operations and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, account for the Office of Secretary of Defense travel of persons assigned to the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, not more than 50 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until the certification required by paragraph (1) is submitted under such paragraph.
(c) Deployment deadline.—Section 1683(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(2) TESTING AND DEPLOYMENT.—The Director shall begin on-orbit testing of a hypersonic and ballistic tracking space sensor no later than December 31, 2022, with full operational deployment as soon as technically feasible thereafter.
“(3) WAIVER.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the deadline for testing specified in paragraph (2) if the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report containing—
“(B) the technical risks and estimated cost of accelerating the program to attempt to meet such deadline;
(d) Assessment and report.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chair of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council established under section 181 of title 10, United States Code, shall—
(1) complete an assessment on whether all efforts being made by the Missile Defense Agency, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Air Force, and the Space Development Agency relating to space-based sensing and tracking capabilities for missile defense are aligned with the requirements of United States Strategic Command, United States Northern Command, United States European Command, and United States Indo-Pacific Command for missile tracking and missile warning that have been validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council; and
Section 130h(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “January 1, 2021” and inserting “January 1, 2026”.
(a) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the proposal for a layered homeland missile defense system included in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2021 (as submitted with the budget of the President for such year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code).
(2) ELEMENTS REQUIRED.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of the approved requirements for a layered homeland missile defense system, based on an assessment by the intelligence community of threats to be addressed at the time of deployment of such a system.
(B) An assessment of how such requirements addressed by a layered homeland missile defense system relate to those addressed by the existing ground-based midcourse defense system, including deployed ground-based interceptors and planned upgrades to such ground-based interceptors.
(C) An analysis of interceptor solutions to meet such requirements, to include land-based Standard Missile 3 (SM–3) Block IIA interceptor systems and the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system, with the number of locations required for deployment and the production numbers of interceptors and related sensors.
(D) A site-specific fielding plan that includes possible locations, the number and type of interceptors and radars in each location, and any associated environmental or permitting considerations, including an assessment of the locations evaluated pursuant to section 227(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 1679; Public Law 112–239) for inclusion in the layered homeland missile defense system.
(E) Relevant policy considerations for deployment of such systems for defense against intercontinental ballistic missiles in the continental United States.
(F) A cost estimate and schedule for options involving a land-based Standard Missile 3 Block IIA interceptor system and the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system, including required environmental assessments.
(b) Limitation on use of funds.—Not more than 50 percent of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for the Missile Defense Agency for the purposes of a layered homeland missile defense system may be obligated or expended until the Director submits to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection (a).
(c) Intelligence community defined.—In this section, the term “intelligence community” has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
Section 232(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81) is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(3) REVIEW OF EMERGING ISSUES.—In carrying out this subsection, as the Comptroller General determines is warranted, the Comptroller General shall review emerging issues and, in consultation with the congressional defense committees, brief such committees or submit to such committees a report on the findings of the Comptroller General with respect to such review.”.
Section 205 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(b) Interim ground-based interceptor.—
(1) DEVELOPMENT.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall commence carrying out a program to develop an interim ground-based interceptor capability that will—
(2) DEPLOYMENT.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Commander of the United States Northern Command, and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall—
(3) WAIVER AUTHORITY.— (A) The Secretary of Defense may waive the requirements under paragraphs (1) and (2) if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(ii) the interim capability development is not in the national security interest of the United States; or
(iii) the next generation interceptor for the ground-based midcourse defense system can deliver capability before the program otherwise required by this subsection.
(B) If the Secretary chooses to waive the requirements under paragraphs (1) and (2), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees along with the certification required by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph—
(c) Capabilities and criteria.—The Director shall ensure that the interim ground-based interceptor developed under subsection (c)(1) meets, at a minimum, the following capabilities and criteria:
(d) Report on funding profile.—The Director shall include with the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2022 (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) a report on the funding profile necessary for the interim ground-based interceptor program to meet the objectives under subsection (c).
In this title:
(1) ALIEN; NATIONAL; NATIONAL OF THE UNITED STATES.—The terms “alien”, “national”, and “national of the United States” have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101).
(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES AND LEADERSHIP.—The term “appropriate congressional committees and leadership” means—
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the majority leader and the minority leader of the Senate; and
(3) BASIC LAW.—The term “Basic Law” means the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.
(5) ENTITY.—The term “entity” means a partnership, joint venture, association, corporation, organization, network, group, or subgroup, or any other form of business collaboration.
(6) FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term “financial institution” means a financial institution specified in section 5312(a)(2) of title 31, United States Code.
(7) HONG KONG.—The term “Hong Kong” means the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.
(8) JOINT DECLARATION.—The term “Joint Declaration” means the Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the People's Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong, done at Beijing on December 19, 1984.
(9) KNOWINGLY.—The term “knowingly”, with respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means that a person has actual knowledge of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result.
Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The Joint Declaration and the Basic Law clarify certain obligations and promises that the Government of China has made with respect to the future of Hong Kong.
(2) The obligations of the Government of China under the Joint Declaration were codified in a legally-binding treaty, signed by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and registered with the United Nations.
(3) The obligations of the Government of China under the Basic Law originate from the Joint Declaration, were passed into the domestic law of China by the National People’s Congress, and are widely considered by citizens of Hong Kong as part of the de facto legal constitution of Hong Kong.
(4) Foremost among the obligations of the Government of China to Hong Kong is the promise that, pursuant to Paragraph 3b of the Joint Declaration, “the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region will enjoy a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs which are the responsibilities of the Central People's Government”.
(5) The obligation specified in Paragraph 3b of the Joint Declaration is referenced, reinforced, and extrapolated on in several portions of the Basic Law, including Articles 2, 12, 13, 14, and 22.
(6) Article 22 of the Basic Law establishes that “No department of the Central People’s Government and no province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government may interfere in the affairs which the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region administers on its own in accordance with this Law.”.
(7) The Joint Declaration and the Basic Law make clear that additional obligations shall be undertaken by China to ensure the “high degree of autonomy” of Hong Kong.
(8) Paragraph 3c of the Joint Declaration states, as reinforced by Articles 2, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 22 of the Basic Law, that Hong Kong “will be vested with executive, legislative and independent judicial power, including that of final adjudication”.
(9) On multiple occasions, the Government of China has undertaken actions that have contravened the letter or intent of the obligation described in paragraph (8) of this section, including the following:
(A) In 1999, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress overruled a decision by the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal on the right of abode.
(B) On multiple occasions, the Government of Hong Kong, at the advice of the Government of China, is suspected to have not allowed persons entry into Hong Kong allegedly because of their support for democracy and human rights in Hong Kong and China.
(C) The Liaison Office of China in Hong Kong has, despite restrictions on interference in the affairs of Hong Kong as detailed in Article 22 of the Basic Law—
(i) openly expressed support for candidates in Hong Kong for Chief Executive and Legislative Council;
(ii) expressed views on various policies for the Government of Hong Kong and other internal matters relating to Hong Kong; and
(iii) on April 17, 2020, asserted that both the Liaison Office of China in Hong Kong and the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office of the State Council “have the right to exercise supervision … on affairs regarding Hong Kong and the mainland, in order to ensure correct implementation of the Basic Law”.
(D) The National People’s Congress has passed laws requiring Hong Kong to pass laws banning disrespectful treatment of the national flag and national anthem of China.
(E) The State Council of China released a white paper on June 10, 2014, that stressed the “comprehensive jurisdiction” of the Government of China over Hong Kong and indicated that Hong Kong must be governed by “patriots”.
(F) The Government of China has directed operatives to kidnap and bring to the mainland, or is otherwise responsible for the kidnapping of, residents of Hong Kong, including businessman Xiao Jianhua and bookseller Gui Minhai.
(G) The Government of Hong Kong, acting with the support of the Government of China, introduced an extradition bill that would have permitted the Government of China to request and enforce extradition requests for any individual present in Hong Kong, regardless of the legality of the request or the degree to which it compromised the judicial independence of Hong Kong.
(10) Paragraph 3e of the Joint Declaration states, as reinforced by Article 5 of the Basic Law, that the “current social and economic systems in Hong Kong will remain unchanged, as so will the life-style.”.
(11) On multiple occasions, the Government of China has undertaken actions that have contravened the letter or intent of the obligation described in paragraph (10) of this section, including the following:
(A) In 2002, the Government of China pressured the Government of Hong Kong to introduce “patriotic” curriculum in primary and secondary schools.
(B) The governments of China and Hong Kong proposed the prohibition of discussion of Hong Kong independence and self-determination in primary and secondary schools, which infringes on freedom of speech.
(12) Paragraph 3e of the Joint Declaration states, as reinforced by Articles 4, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 33, 34, and 39 of the Basic Law, that the “rights and freedoms, including those of person, of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of travel, of movement, of correspondence, of strike, of choice of occupation, of academic research and of religious belief will be ensured by law” in Hong Kong.
(13) On multiple occasions, the Government of China has undertaken actions that have contravened the letter or intent of the obligation described in paragraph (12) of this section, including the following:
(A) On February 26, 2003, the Government of Hong Kong introduced a national security bill that would have placed restrictions on freedom of speech and other protected rights.
(B) The Liaison Office of China in Hong Kong has pressured businesses in Hong Kong not to advertise in newspapers and magazines critical of the governments of China and Hong Kong.
(C) The Hong Kong Police Force selectively blocked demonstrations and protests expressing opposition to the governments of China and Hong Kong or the policies of those governments.
(D) The Government of Hong Kong refused to renew work visa for a foreign journalist, allegedly for hosting a speaker from the banned Hong Kong National Party.
(14) Articles 45 and 68 of the Basic Law assert that the selection of Chief Executive and all members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong should be by “universal suffrage.”.
(15) On multiple occasions, the Government of China has undertaken actions that have contravened the letter or intent of the obligation described in paragraph (14) of this section, including the following:
(A) In 2004, the National People’s Congress created new, antidemocratic procedures restricting the adoption of universal suffrage for the election of the Chief Executive of Hong Kong.
(B) The decision by the National People’s Congress on December 29, 2007, which ruled out universal suffrage in 2012 elections and set restrictions on when and if universal suffrage will be implemented.
(C) The decision by the National People’s Congress on August 31, 2014, which placed limits on the nomination process for the Chief Executive of Hong Kong as a condition for adoption of universal suffrage.
(16) The ways in which the Government of China, at times with the support of a subservient Government of Hong Kong, has acted in contravention of its obligations under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law, as set forth in this section, are deeply concerning to the people of Hong Kong, the United States, and members of the international community who support the autonomy of Hong Kong.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States continues to uphold the principles and policy established in the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5701 et seq.) and the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116–76; 22 U.S.C. 5701 note), which remain consistent with China’s obligations under the Joint Declaration and certain promulgated objectives under the Basic Law, including that—
(A) as set forth in section 101(1) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5711(1)), “The United States should play an active role, before, on, and after July 1, 1997, in maintaining Hong Kong's confidence and prosperity, Hong Kong's role as an international financial center, and the mutually beneficial ties between the people of the United States and the people of Hong Kong.”; and
(B) as set forth in section 2(5) of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5701(5)), “Support for democratization is a fundamental principle of United States foreign policy. As such, it naturally applies to United States policy toward Hong Kong. This will remain equally true after June 30, 1997.”;
(2) although the United States recognizes that, under the Joint Declaration, the Government of China “resumed the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong with effect on 1 July 1997”, the United States supports the autonomy of Hong Kong in furtherance of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 and the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 and advances the desire of the people of Hong Kong to continue the “one country, two systems” regime, in addition to other obligations promulgated by China under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law;
(3) in order to support the benefits and protections that Hong Kong has been afforded by the Government of China under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law, the United States should establish a clear and unambiguous set of penalties with respect to foreign persons determined by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, to be involved in the contravention of the obligations of China under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law and the financial institutions transacting with those foreign persons;
(4) the Secretary of State should provide an unclassified assessment of the reason for imposition of certain economic penalties on entities, so as to permit a clear path for the removal of economic penalties if the sanctioned behavior is reversed and verified by the Secretary of State;
(5) relevant Federal agencies should establish a multilateral sanctions regime with respect to foreign persons involved in the contravention of the obligations of China under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law; and
(6) in addition to the penalties on foreign persons, and financial institutions transacting with those foreign persons, for the contravention of the obligations of China under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law, the United States should take steps, in a time of crisis, to assist permanent residents of Hong Kong who are persecuted or fear persecution as a result of the contravention by China of its obligations under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law to become eligible to obtain lawful entry into the United States.
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, if the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines that a foreign person is materially contributing to, has materially contributed to, or attempts to materially contribute to the failure of the Government of China to meet its obligations under the Joint Declaration or the Basic Law, the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership a report that includes—
(b) Identifying foreign financial institutions.—Not earlier than 30 days and not later than 60 days after the Secretary of State submits to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership the report under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership a report that identifies any foreign financial institution that knowingly conducts a significant transaction with a foreign person identified in the report under subsection (a).
(c) Exclusion of certain information.—
(1) INTELLIGENCE.—The Secretary of State shall not disclose the identity of a person in a report submitted under subsection (a) or (b), or an update under subsection (e), if the Director of National Intelligence determines that such disclosure could compromise an intelligence operation, activity, source, or method of the United States.
(2) LAW ENFORCEMENT.—The Secretary of State shall not disclose the identity of a person in a report submitted under subsection (a) or (b), or an update under subsection (e), if the Attorney General, in coordination, as appropriate, with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the head of any other appropriate Federal law enforcement agency, and the Secretary of the Treasury, determines that such disclosure could reasonably be expected—
(3) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.—If the Director of National Intelligence makes a determination under paragraph (1) or the Attorney General makes a determination under paragraph (2), the Director or the Attorney General, as the case may be, shall notify the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the determination and the reasons for the determination.
(d) Exclusion or removal of foreign persons and foreign financial institutions.—
(1) FOREIGN PERSONS.—The President may exclude a foreign person from the report under subsection (a), or an update under subsection (e), or remove a foreign person from the report or update prior to the imposition of sanctions under section 1706(a) if the material contribution (as described in subsection (g)) that merited inclusion in that report or update—
(2) FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.—The President may exclude a foreign financial institution from the report under subsection (b), or an update under subsection (e), or remove a foreign financial institution from the report or update prior to the imposition of sanctions under section 1707(a) if the significant transaction or significant transactions of the foreign financial institution that merited inclusion in that report or update—
(3) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.—If the President makes a determination under paragraph (1) or (2) to exclude or remove a foreign person or foreign financial institution from a report under subsection (a) or (b), as the case may be, the President shall notify the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the determination and the reasons for the determination.
(e) Update of reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Each report submitted under subsections (a) and (b) shall be updated in an ongoing manner and, to the extent practicable, updated reports shall be resubmitted with the annual report under section 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5731).
(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to terminate the requirement to update the reports under subsections (a) and (b) upon the termination of the requirement to submit the annual report under section 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5731).
(f) Form of reports.—
(g) Material contributions related to obligations of China described.—For purposes of this section, a foreign person materially contributes to the failure of the Government of China to meet its obligations under the Joint Declaration or the Basic Law if the person—
(a) Imposition of sanctions.—
(b) Sanctions described.—The sanctions described in this subsection with respect to a foreign person are the following:
(1) PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS.—The President may, pursuant to such regulations as the President may prescribe, prohibit any person from—
(2) EXCLUSION FROM THE UNITED STATES AND REVOCATION OF VISA OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION.—In the case of a foreign person who is an individual, the President may direct the Secretary of State to deny a visa to, and the Secretary of Homeland Security to exclude from the United States, the foreign person, subject to regulatory exceptions to permit the United States to comply with the Agreement regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, between the United Nations and the United States, or other applicable international obligations.
(a) Imposition of sanctions.—
(1) INITIAL SANCTIONS.—Not later than one year after the date on which a foreign financial institution is included in the report under section 1705(b) or an update to that report under section 1705(e), the President shall impose not fewer than 5 of the sanctions described in subsection (b) with respect to that foreign financial institution.
(b) Sanctions described.—The sanctions described in this subsection with respect to a foreign financial institution are the following:
(1) LOANS FROM UNITED STATES FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.—The United States Government may prohibit any United States financial institution from making loans or providing credits to the foreign financial institution.
(2) PROHIBITION ON DESIGNATION AS PRIMARY DEALER.—Neither the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System nor the Federal Reserve Bank of New York may designate, or permit the continuation of any prior designation of, the foreign financial institution as a primary dealer in United States Government debt instruments.
(3) PROHIBITION ON SERVICE AS A REPOSITORY OF GOVERNMENT FUNDS.—The foreign financial institution may not serve as agent of the United States Government or serve as repository for United States Government funds.
(4) FOREIGN EXCHANGE.—The President may, pursuant to such regulations as the President may prescribe, prohibit any transactions in foreign exchange that are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and involve the foreign financial institution.
(5) BANKING TRANSACTIONS.—The President may, pursuant to such regulations as the President may prescribe, prohibit any transfers of credit or payments between financial institutions or by, through, or to any financial institution, to the extent that such transfers or payments are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and involve the foreign financial institution.
(6) PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS.—The President may, pursuant to such regulations as the President may prescribe, prohibit any person from—
(7) RESTRICTION ON EXPORTS, REEXPORTS, AND TRANSFERS.—The President, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, may restrict or prohibit exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) of commodities, software, and technology subject to the jurisdiction of the United States directly or indirectly to the foreign financial institution.
(8) BAN ON INVESTMENT IN EQUITY OR DEBT.—The President may, pursuant to such regulations or guidelines as the President may prescribe, prohibit any United States person from investing in or purchasing significant amounts of equity or debt instruments of the foreign financial institution.
(9) EXCLUSION OF CORPORATE OFFICERS.—The President may direct the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security, to exclude from the United States any alien that is determined to be a corporate officer or principal of, or a shareholder with a controlling interest in, the foreign financial institution, subject to regulatory exceptions to permit the United States to comply with the Agreement regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, between the United Nations and the United States, or other applicable international obligations.
(10) SANCTIONS ON PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.—The President may impose on the principal executive officer or officers of the foreign financial institution, or on individuals performing similar functions and with similar authorities as such officer or officers, any of the sanctions described in paragraphs (1) through (8) that are applicable.
(c) Timing of sanctions.—The President may impose sanctions required under subsection (a) with respect to a financial institution included in the report under section 1705(b) or an update to that report under section 1705(e) beginning on the day on which the financial institution is included in that report or update.
(a) National security waiver.—Unless a disapproval resolution is enacted under subsection (d), the President may waive the application of sanctions under section 1706 or 1707 with respect to a foreign person or foreign financial institution if the President—
(b) Termination of sanctions and removal from report.—Unless a disapproval resolution is enacted under subsection (d), the President may terminate the application of sanctions under section 1706 or 1707 with respect to a foreign person or foreign financial institution and remove the foreign person from the report required under section 1705(a) or the foreign financial institution from the report required under section 1705(b), as the case may be, if the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, determines that the actions taken by the foreign person or foreign financial institution that led to the imposition of sanctions—
(c) Termination of Act.—
(1) REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than July 1, 2046, the President, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the heads of such other Federal agencies as the President considers appropriate, shall submit to Congress a report evaluating the implementation of this title and sanctions imposed pursuant to this title.
(d) Congressional review.—
(1) RESOLUTIONS.—
(A) DISAPPROVAL RESOLUTION.—In this section, the term “disapproval resolution” means only a joint resolution of either House of Congress—
(i) the title of which is as follows: “A joint resolution disapproving the waiver or termination of sanctions with respect to a foreign person that contravenes the obligations of China with respect to Hong Kong or a foreign financial institution that conducts a significant transaction with that person.”; and
(ii) the sole matter after the resolving clause of which is the following: “Congress disapproves of the action under section 1708 of the Hong Kong Autonomy Act relating to the application of sanctions imposed with respect to a foreign person that contravenes the obligations of China with respect to Hong Kong, or a foreign financial institution that conducts a significant transaction with that person, on _______ relating to ________.”, with the first blank space being filled with the appropriate date and the second blank space being filled with a short description of the proposed action.
(B) TERMINATION RESOLUTION.—In this section, the term “termination resolution” means only a joint resolution of either House of Congress—
(3) FLOOR CONSIDERATION IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—If a committee of the House of Representatives to which a covered resolution has been referred has not reported the resolution within 10 calendar days after the date of referral, that committee shall be discharged from further consideration of the resolution.
(4) CONSIDERATION IN THE SENATE.—
(A) COMMITTEE REFERRAL.—
(B) REPORTING AND DISCHARGE.—If a committee to which a covered resolution was referred has not reported the resolution within 10 calendar days after the date of referral of the resolution, that committee shall be discharged from further consideration of the resolution and the resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar.
(C) PROCEEDING TO CONSIDERATION.—Notwithstanding Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, it is in order at any time after the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs or the Committee on Foreign Relations, as the case may be, reports a covered resolution to the Senate or has been discharged from consideration of such a resolution (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) to move to proceed to the consideration of the resolution, and all points of order against the resolution (and against consideration of the resolution) are waived. The motion to proceed is not debatable. The motion is not subject to a motion to postpone. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order.
(D) RULINGS OF THE CHAIR ON PROCEDURE.—Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate, as the case may be, to the procedure relating to a covered resolution shall be decided without debate.
(E) CONSIDERATION OF VETO MESSAGES.—Debate in the Senate of any veto message with respect to a covered resolution, including all debatable motions and appeals in connection with the resolution, shall be limited to 10 hours, to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the majority leader and the minority leader or their designees.
(5) RULES RELATING TO SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—
(A) TREATMENT OF SENATE RESOLUTION IN HOUSE.—In the House of Representatives, the following procedures shall apply to a covered resolution received from the Senate (unless the House has already passed a resolution relating to the same proposed action):
(ii) If a committee to which a resolution has been referred has not reported the resolution within 2 calendar days after the date of referral, that committee shall be discharged from further consideration of the resolution.
(iii) Beginning on the third legislative day after each committee to which a resolution has been referred reports the resolution to the House or has been discharged from further consideration thereof, it shall be in order to move to proceed to consider the resolution in the House. All points of order against the motion are waived. Such a motion shall not be in order after the House has disposed of a motion to proceed on the resolution. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion. The motion shall not be debatable. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is disposed of shall not be in order.
(iv) The resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order against the resolution and against its consideration are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final passage without intervening motion except 2 hours of debate equally divided and controlled by the sponsor of the resolution (or a designee) and an opponent. A motion to reconsider the vote on passage of the resolution shall not be in order.
(B) TREATMENT OF HOUSE RESOLUTION IN SENATE.—
(i) RECEIVED BEFORE PASSAGE OF SENATE RESOLUTION.—If, before the passage by the Senate of a covered resolution, the Senate receives an identical resolution from the House of Representatives, the following procedures shall apply:
(6) RULES OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE.—This subsection is enacted by Congress—
(a) Implementation.—The President may exercise all authorities provided under sections 203 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 1704) to the extent necessary to carry out this title.
(b) Penalties.—A person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of section 1706 or 1707 or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out that section shall be subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) to the same extent as a person that commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) of that section.
Nothing in this title shall be construed as an authorization of military force against China.
This division may be cited as the “Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021”.
(a) Expiration of authorizations after five years.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—
(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—
Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take effect on the later of—
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alaska | Fort Wainwright | $114,000,000 |
| Arizona | Yuma Proving Ground | $14,000,000 |
| California | Military Ocean Terminal Concord | $46,000,000 |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $28,000,000 |
| Georgia | Fort Gillem | $71,000,000 |
| Fort Gordon | $80,000,000 | |
| Hawaii | Aliamanu Military Reservation | $71,000,000 |
| Schofield Barracks | $39,000,000 | |
| Wheeler Army Airfield | $89,000,000 | |
| Louisiana | Fort Polk | $25,000,000 |
| Oklahoma | McAlester AAP | $35,000,000 |
| South Carolina | Fort Jackson | $7,000,000 |
| Virginia | Humphreys Engineer Center | $51,000,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation | Amount |
| Italy | Casmera Renato Dal Din | $10,200,000 |
(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Units | Amount |
| Italy | Vicenza | Family Housing New Construction | $84,100,000 |
| Kwajalein | Kwajalein Atoll | Family Housing Replacement Construction | $32,000,000 |
(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $3,300,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2102(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1146) for Camp Walker, Korea, the Secretary of the Army may construct an elevated walkway between two existing parking garages to connect children’s playgrounds using amounts available for Family Housing New Construction, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (129 Stat. 1290).
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| California | Camp Pendleton | $115,530,000 |
| Lemoore | $187,220,000 | |
| Point Mugu | $26,700,000 | |
| Port Hueneme | $43,500,000 | |
| San Diego | $128,500,000 | |
| Seal Beach | $46,800,000 | |
| Twentynine Palms | $76,500,000 | |
| Hawaii | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | $114,900,000 |
| Maine | Kittery | $715,000,000 |
| NCTAMS LANT Detachment Cutler | $26,100,000 | |
| Nevada | Fallon | $29,040,000 |
| North Carolina | Cherry Point | $51,900,000 |
| Virginia | Norfolk | $39,800,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Bahrain Island | SW Asia | $68,340,000 |
| El Salvador | Comalapa | $28,000,000 |
| Greece | Souda Bay | $50,180,000 |
| Guam | Andersen Air Force Base | $21,280,000 |
| Joint Region Marianas | $546,550,000 | |
| Spain | Rota | $60,110,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $5,854,000.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $37,043,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Colorado | United States Air Force Academy | $49,000,000 |
| New Jersey | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | $22,000,000 |
| South Dakota | Ellsworth Air Force Base | $96,000,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $19,500,000 |
| Utah | Hill Air Force Base | $132,000,000 |
| Virginia | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | $19,500,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Guam | Andersen Air Force Base | $56,000,000 |
| Qatar | Al Udeid | $26,000,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $2,969,000.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $94,245,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(a) In general.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (division B of Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1826) for Royal Air Force Lakenheath, United Kingdom, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 2,700 square meter consolidated corrosion control and wash rack facility at such location.
(a) Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2246) for Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 426 square meter non-contained (outdoor) range with covered and heated firing line for construction of an F–35 CATM Range, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (132 Stat. 2404).
(b) Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2246) for Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct an entrance road and gate complex consistent with the Unified Facilities Criteria relating to entry control facilities and the construction guidelines for the Air Force, in the amount of $48,000,000.
(2) DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION.—In constructing the entrance road and gate complex under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 190 square meter visitor control center, a 44 square meter gate house, a 124 square meter privately owned vehicle inspection facility, a 338 square meter truck inspection facility, and a 45 square meter gatehouse.
(c) Royal Air Force Lakenheath, United Kingdom.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2247) for Royal Air Force Lakenheath, United Kingdom, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 1,206 square meter maintenance facility for construction of an F–35A ADAL Conventional Munitions MX, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (132 Stat. 2400).
(d) Force protection and safety.—The table in section 4601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2406) is amended in the item relating to Force Protection and Safety, Air Force, Unspecified Worldwide Locations, by striking “35,000” and inserting “50,000”.
(a) Construction and acquisition.—Section 2302 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(b) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct or acquire family housing units (including land, acquisition, and supporting facilities) at the installation, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Purpose | Amount |
| Germany | Spangdahlem Air Base | 76 Units | $53,584,000”. |
(b) Funding.—Section 2303 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by striking “$53,584,000” and inserting “$46,638,000”.
(a) Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2912(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92) for Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct—
(1) not more than 4,770 square meters of aircraft support equipment storage for construction of an Auxiliary Ground Equipment Facility, as specified in the funding table in section 4603 of such Act;
(2) not more than 18,770 square meters of visiting quarters for construction of Dorm Complex Phase 1, as specified in such funding table;
(3) 2,127 square meters of squadron operations and 2,875 square meters of aircraft maintenance unit for construction of Ops/Aircraft Maintenance Unit/Hangar #2, as specified in such funding table;
(4) 2,127 square meters of squadron operations and 2,875 square meters of aircraft maintenance unit for construction of Ops/Aircraft Maintenance Unit/Hangar #3, as specified in such funding table;
(5) not more than 3,420 square meters of headquarters for construction of an Operations Group/Maintenance Group HQ, as specified in such funding table;
(6) not more than 930 square meters of equipment storage for construction of a Security Forces Mobility Storage Facility, as specified in such funding table;
(b) Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2912(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92) for Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct—
(1) seven 2.5-megawatt diesel engine generators, seven diesel exhaust fluid systems, 15-kilovolt switchgear, two import/export inter-ties, five import-only inter-ties, and 800 square meters of switchgear facility for construction of an Emergency Power Microgrid, as specified in the funding table in section 4603 of such Act;
(2) 2,536 square meters of warehouse for construction of a Logistics Readiness Squadron Campus, as specified in such funding table;
(3) 4,218 square meters of operations center and 1,343 square meters of military working dog kennel for construction of a Security Campus, as specified in such funding table;
(c) Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2912(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92) for Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct up to 6,720 square meters of dormitory for construction of a Dormitory, as specified in the funding table in section 4603 of such Act.
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alabama | Anniston Army Depot | $18,000,000 |
| Alaska | Fort Greely | $48,000,000 |
| Arizona | Fort Huachuca | $33,728,000 |
| Yuma | $49,500,000 | |
| California | Beale Air Force Base | $22,800,000 |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $15,600,000 |
| CONUS Unspecified | CONUS Unspecified | $14,400,000 |
| Florida | Hurlburt Field | $83,120,000 |
| Kentucky | Fort Knox | $69,310,000 |
| New Mexico | Kirtland Air Force Base | $46,600,000 |
| North Carolina | Fort Bragg | $113,800,000 |
| Ohio | Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | $23,500,000 |
| Texas | Fort Hood | $32,700,000 |
| Virginia | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story | $112,500,000 |
| Washington | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | $21,800,000 |
| Manchester | $82,000,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Japan | Def Fuel Support Point Tsurumi | $49,500,000 |
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alabama | Fort Rucker | $24,000,000 |
| Arkansas | Fort Smith Air National Guard Base | $2,600,000 |
| District of Columbia | Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling | $35,933,000 |
| Georgia | Fort Benning | $17,000,000 |
| Mississippi | MTA Camp Shelby | $30,000,000 |
| North Carolina | Fort Bragg | $6,100,000 |
| Ohio | Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | $35,000,000 |
| Tennessee | Memphis International Airport | $4,780,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Unspecified Worldwide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | $142,500,000 |
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States.
(a) Authorization.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Authority To recognize NATO authorization amounts as budgetary resources for project execution.—When the United States is designated as the Host Nation for the purposes of executing a project under the NATO Security Investment Program (NSIP), the Department of Defense construction agent may recognize the NATO project authorization amounts as budgetary resources to incur obligations for the purposes of executing the NSIP project.
(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 2350m and inserting the following new section 2350m:
Ҥ 2350m. Execution of projects under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
“(a) Authority To execute projects.—When the United States is designated as the Host Nation for purposes of executing a project under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (in this section referred to as the ‘Program’), the Secretary of Defense may accept such designation and carry out such project consistent with the requirements of this section.
“(b) Project funding.—The Secretary of Defense may fund authorized expenditures of projects accepted under subsection (a) with—
“(c) Authority To accept contributions.— (1) The Secretary of Defense may accept contributions from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and member nations of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for the purpose of carrying out a project under subsection (a).
“(2) Contributions accepted under paragraph (1) shall be placed in an account established for the purpose of carrying out the project for which the funds were provided and shall remain available until expended.
“(3) (A) If contributions are made under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for a project or portion of a project previously completed by the Department of Defense, such contributions shall be credited to—
“(i) the appropriations used for the project or portion thereof, if such appropriations have not yet expired; or
“(d) Obligation authority.—The construction agent of the Department of Defense designated by the Secretary of Defense to execute a project under subsection (a) may recognize the North Atlantic Treaty Organization project authorization amounts as budgetary resources to incur obligations against for the purposes of executing the project.
“(e) Insufficient Contributions.— (1) In the event that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization does not agree to contribute funding for all costs necessary for the Department of Defense to carry out a project under subsection (a), including necessary personnel costs of the construction agent designated by the Department of Defense, contract claims, and any conjunctive funding requirements that exceed the project authorization or standards of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Secretary of Defense, upon determination that completion of the project is in the national interest of the United States, may fund such costs using any funds available in appropriations for the Program.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 138 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2350m and inserting the following new item:
(c) Conforming repeals.—
(1) 2019.—Section 2502 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2252) is amended—
(2) 2020.—Section 2502 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military construction projects for the installations or locations in the Republic of Korea, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Component | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Army | Camp Carroll | Site Development | $49,000,000 |
| Army | Camp Humphreys | Attack Reconnaissance Battalion Hangar | $99,000,000 |
| Army | Camp Humphreys | Hot Refuel Point | $35,000,000 |
| Navy | COMROKFLT Naval Base, Busan | Maritime Operations Center | $26,000,000 |
| Air Force | Daegu Air Base | AGE Facility and Parking Apron | $14,000,000 |
| Air Force | Kunsan Air Base | Backup Generator Plant | $19,000,000 |
| Air Force | Osan Air Base | Aircraft Corrosion Control Facility (Phase 3) | $12,000,000 |
| Air Force | Osan Air Base | Child Development Center | $20,000,000 |
| Air Force | Osan Air Base | Relocate Munitions Storage Area Delta (Phase 1) | $84,000,000 |
| Defense-Wide | Camp Humphreys | Elementary School | $58,000,000 |
Pursuant to agreement with the State of Qatar for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military construction projects for the installation in the State of Qatar, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Component | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (A12) | $63,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (B12) | $63,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (D10) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (009) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (007) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Armory/Mount | $7,200,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (A06) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Dining Facility | $14,600,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (BOS) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (B04) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (A04) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Billet (AOS) | $77,000,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Dining Facility | $14,600,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | MSG (Base Operations Support Facility) | $9,300,000 |
| Air Force | Al Udeid | ITN (Communications Facility) | $3,500,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Arizona | Tucson | $18,100,000 |
| Arkansas | Fort Chaffee | $15,000,000 |
| California | Bakersfield | $9,300,000 |
| Colorado | Peterson Air Force Base | $15,000,000 |
| Indiana | Shelbyville | $12,000,000 |
| Kentucky | Frankfort | $15,000,000 |
| Mississippi | Brandon | $10,400,000 |
| Nebraska | North Platte | $9,300,000 |
| New Jersey | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | $15,000,000 |
| Ohio | Columbus | $15,000,000 |
| Oklahoma | Ardmore | $9,800,000 |
| Oregon | Hermiston | $25,035,000 |
| Puerto Rico | Fort Allen | $37,000,000 |
| South Carolina | Joint Base Charleston | $15,000,000 |
| Tennessee | McMinnville | $11,200,000 |
| Texas | Fort Worth | $13,800,000 |
| Utah | Nephi | $12,000,000 |
| Virgin Islands | St. Croix | $39,400,000 |
| Wisconsin | Appleton | $11,600,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Florida | Gainesville | $36,000,000 |
| Massachusetts | Devens Reserve Forces Training Area | $8,700,000 |
| North Carolina | Asheville | $24,000,000 |
| Wisconsin | Fort McCoy | $17,100,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Maryland | Reisterstown | $39,500,000 |
| Minnesota | Naval Operational Support Center Minneapolis | $12,800,000 |
| Utah | Hill Air Force Base | $25,010,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alabama | Montgomery Regional Airport | $23,600,000 |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $20,000,000 |
| Maryland | Joint Base Andrews | $9,400,000 |
| North Dakota | Hector International Airport | $17,500,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $10,800,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation inside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation | Amount |
| Texas | Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth | $39,200,000 |
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (division B of Public Law 116–92) for Anniston Army Depot, Alabama, for construction of an Enlisted Transient Barracks as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act, the Secretary of the Army may construct a training barracks at Fort McClellan, Alabama.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to Congress a plan to finish remediation activities conducted by the Secretary in Umatilla, Oregon, by not later than three years after such date of enactment.
In the case in which a Fleet Readiness Center is a tenant command aboard an installation of the Marine Corps, the Navy shall be responsible for programming, requesting, and executing any military construction requirements for the Fleet Readiness Center.
(a) Authority to carry out projects.—Subject to subsections (b) and (d) and within the amount appropriated for such purpose, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out military construction projects to convert Minuteman III launch facilities and launch centers to ground-based strategic deterrent configurations.
(b) Master plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Prior to the authority under subsection (a) being available for use, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a master plan, broken out by year and location, for the planned launch facilities and launch centers to be converted to ground-based strategic deterrent configurations pursuant to a project under this section.
(c) Management of design and construction.—The Secretary of the Air Force may select a single, prime contractor to manage the design and construction phases of projects carried out under subsection (a).
(d) Congressional notification.—
(1) REPORT.—When a decision is made to carry out a project under subsection (a) and before carrying out such project, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on that decision.
(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 2830 and inserting the following new section:
(b) Privatized housing reform.—Subchapter V of chapter 169 of such title is amended—
(1) in section 2890—
(B) in subsection (e)(2), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting “a” before “landlord”; and
(4) in section 2892a—
(C) in subsection (a), as designated by subparagraph (A), by striking “housing unit, before the prospective tenant” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “housing unit—
(6) in section 2894—
(B) in subsection (c)—
(i) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “24 hours” and inserting “two business days”;
(iii) in paragraph (4), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting “, at a minimum,” before “the following persons”;
(C) in subsection (e)—
(iii) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “, the tenant may” and all that follows through “in which—” and inserting “regarding maintenance guidelines or procedures or habitability, the tenant may request that all or part of the payments described in paragraph (3) for lease of the housing unit be segregated and not used by the property owner, property manager, or landlord pending completion of the dispute resolution process.
(c) Reports.—Section 2884(c)(10) of such title is amended by striking “specific analysis” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “list of dispute resolution cases by installation and the final outcome of each such case.”.
(d) Payment authority.—Section 606(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 10 U.S.C. 2871 note) is amended—
(2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking “payments to” and all that follows through “subparagraph (C)” and inserting “monthly payments, under such terms and in such amounts as determined by the Secretary, to one of more lessors responsible for underfunded MHPI housing projects identified pursuant to subparagraph (C) under the jurisdiction of the Secretary”; and
(e) Suspension of resident energy conservation program.—Section 3063(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(f) Clerical amendments.—
(1) CHIEF HOUSING OFFICER.—
(A) ADDITION.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2870 the following new item:
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement the recommendations of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense contained in the report of the Inspector General dated April 30, 2020, and entitled “Evaluation of the DoD's Management of Health and Safety Hazards in Government-Owned and Government-Controlled Military Family Housing”.
(a) Utility privatization contract renewals.—Section 2688(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Use of ERCIP funds on privatized utility systems.—Section 2914 of such title is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):
“(c) Use of certain other authorities.—A project under this section may be—
“(1) carried out in conjunction with the authorities provided in subsections (j), and (k) of section 2688 of this title and section 2913 of this title, notwithstanding that the United States does not own a utility system covered by the project; or
“(2) included as a separate requirement in a contract entered into pursuant to title VIII of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8287 et seq.).”.
(a) In general.—Subchapter I of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2815 the following new section:
Ҥ 2816. Consideration of energy security and energy resilience in life-cycle cost for military construction
“(a) In general.— (1) The Secretary concerned, when evaluating the life-cycle designed cost of a covered military construction project, shall include as a facility requirement the long-term consideration of energy security and energy resilience that would ensure that the resulting facility is capable of continuing to perform its missions, during the life of the facility, in the event of a natural or human-caused disaster, an attack, or any other unplanned event that would otherwise interfere with the ability of the facility to perform its missions.
“(b) Inclusion in the building life-cycle cost program.—The Secretary shall include the requirements of subsection (a) in applying the latest version of the building life-cycle cost program, as developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to consider on-site distributed energy assets in a building design for a covered military construction project.
“(c) Covered military construction project defined.— (1) In this section, the term ‘covered military construction project’ means a military construction project for a facility that is used to perform critical functions during a natural or human-caused disaster, an attack, or any other unplanned event.
Notwithstanding section 3015 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 892), the withdrawal and reservation of lands (known as the Fallon Range Training Complex) made by section 3011(a) of such Act (113 Stat. 885) shall terminate on November 6, 2041.
Notwithstanding section 3015 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 892), the withdrawal and reservation of lands (known as the Nevada Test and Training Range) made by section 3011(b) of such Act (113 Stat. 886) shall terminate on November 6, 2041.
(a) Authority.—The Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without consideration, approximately 1.23 acres of land within Naval Support Activity Panama City, Florida, that are used on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act by the Department of the Navy pursuant to Executive Order 10355 (17 Fed. Reg. 4831; relating to delegating to the Secretary of the Interior the authority of the President to withdraw or reserve lands of the United States for public purposes) and the public land order entitled “Public Land Order 952” (19 Fed. Reg. 2085 (April 10, 1954)).
(b) Status of Federal land after transfer.—Upon completion of a transfer to the Secretary of the Navy of a parcel of land under subsection (a), the parcel received by the Secretary of the Navy shall cease to be public land and shall be treated as property (as defined in section 102(9) of title 40, United States Code) under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy.
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Army (in this section referred to as the “Secretary”) may convey, without consideration, to the State of Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs (in this section referred to as the “State”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property (in this section referred to as the “Property”), including any improvements thereon, consisting of not more than 3,000 acres at Camp Navajo, Arizona, for the purpose of permitting the State to use the Property for—
(b) Conditions on conveyance.—The conveyance authorized by subsection (a) shall be subject to the following conditions:
(c) Reversionary interest.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary determines at any time that the Property is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance authorized by subsection (a), or that the State has not complied with the conditions specified in subsection (b), all right, title, and interest in and to the Property, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto the Property.
(d) Alternative consideration option.—
(1) CONSIDERATION OPTION.—In lieu of exercising the reversionary interest under subsection (c), the Secretary may accept an offer by the State to pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair market value of the Property, excluding the value of any improvements on the Property constructed without Federal funds after the date of the conveyance authorized by subsection (a), as determined by the Secretary.
(2) TREATMENT OF CONSIDERATION RECEIVED.—Consideration received by the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established for the Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, and shall be available to the Secretary for the same uses and subject to the same limitations as provided in that section.
(e) Payment of cost of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall require the State to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation related to the conveyance, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1)(A) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance or, if the period of availability for obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the appropriations or fund that is currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(f) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the Property shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.
(g) Additional terms and conditions.—The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(h) Environmental obligations.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as alleviating, altering, or affecting the responsibility of the United States for cleanup and remediation of the Property in accordance with—
(1) the Defense Environmental Restoration Program under section 2701(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code; and
(2) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.).
(a) Taking of considerations into account required.—In determining whether to proceed with any basing decision in the United States after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall take into account, among such other factors as such Secretary considers appropriate, the military family readiness considerations specified in subsection (b).
(b) Military family readiness considerations.—The military family readiness considerations specified in this subsection are the following:
(1) INTERSTATE PORTABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION CREDENTIALS.—The extent to which the State in which the installation subject to the basing decision is or will be located accepts as valid professional licensure and certification credentials obtained in other States, including professional licensure and certification credentials in the following professional fields (and any subfield of such field):
(2) PUBLIC EDUCATION.—The extent to which public education is available and accessible to dependents of members of the Armed Forces in the military housing area in which the installation subject to the basing decision is or will be located, including with respect to the following:
(3) HOUSING.—The extent to which housing (including family housing) that meets Department of Defense requirements is available and accessible to members of the Armed Forces through the private sector in the military housing area in which the installation subject to the basing decision is or will be located.
(4) HEALTH CARE.—The extent to which primary healthcare and specialty healthcare is available and accessible to dependents of members of the Armed Forces through the private sector in the local community in which the installation subject to the basing decision is or will be located, including care for military dependents with special needs.
(5) INTERGOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT.—The extent to which the State in which the installation subject to the basing decision is or will be located, and local governments in the vicinity of the installation, have or will have intergovernmental support agreements with the installation for the effective and efficient provision of public services to the installation.
(c) Analytical framework.—The Secretary of a military department shall take into account the considerations specified in subsection (b), among such other factors as the Secretary considers appropriate, in determining whether to proceed with a basing decision under subsection (a) using an analytical framework developed by the Secretary for that purpose that uses criteria based on quantitative data available to the Department of Defense and on such reliable quantitative data from sources outside the Department as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(d) Basing decision scorecard.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Each Secretary of a military department shall establish and maintain a scorecard on military installations under the jurisdiction of such Secretary, and on States and localities in which such installations are or may be located, relevant to the taking into account of the considerations specified in subsection (b) in determinations of such Secretary on basing decisions as required by subsection (a).
(e) Briefings.—Not later than April 1 of each of 2021, 2022, and 2023, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on actions taken pursuant to this section, including a description and assessment of the effect of the taking into account of the considerations specified in subsection (b) on particular basing decisions in the United States during the one-year period ending on the date of the briefing.
No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement any activity that reduces air base resiliency or demolishes protected aircraft shelters in the European theater, and the Department may not otherwise implement any such activity, without creating a similar protection from attack in the European theater until such time as the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that protected aircraft shelters are not required in the European theater.
(a) Prohibition on use of funds.—No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2021 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement any activity that closes or returns to the host nation any existing base under the European Consolidation Initiative.
(b) Prohibition on closure or return.—The Secretary of Defense shall not implement any activity that closes or returns to the host nation any existing base under the European Consolidation Initiative until the Secretary certifies that there is no longer a need for a rotational military presence in the European theater.
Section 2601(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “a military museum,” after “offered to”.
Section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(l) Treatment of insured depository institutions.— (1) Each covered insured depository institution operating on a military installation within the continental United States may be allotted space or leased land on the military installation without charge for rent or services in the same manner as a credit union organized under State law or a Federal credit union under section 124 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1770) if space is available.
“(2) Each covered insured depository institution, credit union organized under State law, and Federal credit union operating on a military installation within the continental United States shall be treated equally with respect to policies of the Department of Defense governing the financial terms of leases, logistical support, services, and utilities.
“(3) The Secretary concerned shall not be required to provide no-cost office space or a no-cost land lease to any covered insured depository institution, credit union organized under State law, or Federal credit union.
“(4) In this subsection:
“(A) The term ‘covered insured depository institution’ means an insured depository institution that meets the requirements applicable to a credit union organized under State law or a Federal credit union under section 124 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1770). The depositors of an insured depository institution shall be considered members for purposes of the application of this subparagraph to that section.
“(B) The term ‘Federal credit union’ has the meaning given the term in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752).
“(C) The term ‘insured depository institution’ has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).”.
(a) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force or the Secretary of the Navy determines that noise restrictions placed on an operational aviation unit under the jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned prohibit the unit from reaching a combat ready or deployable status or prohibit the maintaining of aircrew currency requirements or required noise mitigation measures become cost prohibitive to the Department of Defense, the Secretary concerned, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth—
(b) Cost prohibitive.—A required noise mitigation measure shall be considered cost prohibitive to the Department of Defense for purposes of subsection (a) if the cost to implement the measure at an installation exceeds 10 percent of the annual budget for the installation for facilities sustainment, restoration, and modernization.
Section 7(1) of the Oklahoma City National Memorial Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 450ss–5(1)) is amended by striking “there is hereby authorized” and inserting “the Secretary may provide, from the National Park Service's national recreation and preservation account, the remainder of”.
The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Amount |
| Spain | Rota | $59,230,000 |
The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Amount |
| Germany | Ramstein | $36,345,000 |
| Spangdahlem Air Base | $25,824,000 | |
| Romania | Campia Turzii | $130,500,000 |
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2020, for the military construction projects outside the United States authorized by this title as specified in the funding table in section 4602.
(a) In general.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 by section 2903 and available as specified in the funding table in section 4602, $3,600,000,000 shall be available for replenishment of funds that were authorized to be appropriated by military construction authorization Acts for fiscal years before fiscal year 2021 for military construction projects authorized by such Acts, but were used instead for military construction projects authorized by section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, in connection with the national emergency along the southern land border of the United States declared in 2019 pursuant to the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).
(b) Replenishment by transfer.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Any amounts available under subsection (a) that are used for replenishment of funds as described in that subsection shall be transferred to the account that was the source of such funds.
(c) Use of funds.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Amounts transferred under subsection (b) for replenishment of funds as described in subsection (a) may be used only for military construction projects for which such funds were originally authorized in a military construction authorization Act described in subsection (a).
(2) NO INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED AMOUNT OF PROJECTS.—The total amount of funds available for a military construction project described in paragraph (1) may not exceed the current amount authorized for such project by applicable military construction authorization Acts (including this Act). A replenishment of funds under this section for a military construction project shall not operate to increase the authorized amount of the project or the amount authorized to be available for the project.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2021 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows:
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2021 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following new plant project:
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2021 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XVII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) Review of adequacy of Administration budget by Nuclear Weapons Council.—
“(1) TRANSMISSION TO COUNCIL.—The Secretary of Energy shall transmit to the Nuclear Weapons Council (in this section referred to as the ‘Council’) a copy of the proposed budget request of the Administration for each fiscal year before that budget request is submitted to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget in relation to the preparation of the budget of the President to be submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code.
“(2) REVIEW AND DETERMINATION OF ADEQUACY.—
“(A) REVIEW.—The Council shall review each budget request transmitted to the Council under paragraph (1).
“(B) DETERMINATION OF ADEQUACY.—
“(i) INADEQUATE REQUESTS.—If the Council determines that a budget request for a fiscal year transmitted to the Council under paragraph (1) is inadequate, in whole or in part, to implement the objectives of the Department of Defense with respect to nuclear weapons for that fiscal year, the Council shall submit to the Secretary of Energy a written description of funding levels and specific initiatives that would, in the determination of the Council, make the budget request adequate to implement those objectives.
“(ii) ADEQUATE REQUESTS.—If the Council determines that a budget request for a fiscal year transmitted to the Council under paragraph (1) is adequate to implement the objectives described in clause (i) for that fiscal year, the Council shall submit to the Secretary of Energy a written statement confirming the adequacy of the request.
“(3) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY RESPONSE.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Council submits to the Secretary of Energy a written description under paragraph (2)(B)(i) with respect to the budget request of the Administration for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall include as an appendix to the budget request submitted to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget—
“(B) TRANSMISSION TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of Energy shall transmit to Congress, with the budget justification materials submitted in support of the Department of Energy budget for a fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), a copy of the appendix described in subparagraph (A).
“(b) Review and certification of Department of Energy budget by Nuclear Weapons Council.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—At the time the Secretary of Energy submits the budget request of the Department of Energy for that fiscal year to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget in relation to the preparation of the budget of the President, the Secretary shall transmit a copy of the budget request of the Department to the Council.
“(2) CERTIFICATION.—The Council shall—
“(B) based on the review under subparagraph (A), make a determination with respect to whether the budget request includes the funding levels and initiatives described in subsection (a)(2)(B)(i); and
(a) In general.—Subtitle C of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“SEC. 3248. Alternative personnel system.
“(a) In general.—The Administrator may adapt the pay banding and performance-based pay adjustment demonstration project carried out by the Administration under the authority provided by section 4703 of title 5, United States Code, into a permanent alternative personnel system for the Administration (to be known as the ‘National Nuclear Security Administration Personnel System’) and implement that system with respect to employees of the Administration.
“(b) Modifications.—In adapting the demonstration project described in subsection (a) into a permanent alternative personnel system, the Administrator—
“(1) may, subject to paragraph (2), revise the requirements and limitations of the demonstration project to the extent necessary; and
“(2) shall—
“(A) ensure that the permanent alternative personnel system is carried out in a manner consistent with the final plan for the demonstration project published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2007 (72 Fed. Reg. 72776);
“(B) ensure that significant changes in the system not take effect until revisions to the plan for the demonstration project are approved by the Office of Personnel Management and published in the Federal Register;
“(C) ensure that procedural modifications or clarifications to the final plan for the demonstration project be made through local notification processes;
“(D) authorize, and establish incentives for, employees of the Administration to have rotational assignments among different programs of the Administration, the headquarters and field offices of the Administration, and the management and operating contractors of the Administration; and
“(c) Application to Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program.—The Director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program established pursuant to section 4101 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2511) and section 3216 of this Act may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Navy, apply the alternative personnel system under subsection (a) to—
(b) Briefing.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on the implementation of section 3248 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act, as added by subsection (a).
(c) Conforming amendments.—Section 3116 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1888; 50 U.S.C. 2441 note prec) is amended—
Section 1204(9) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10284(9)) is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following:
“(F) an employee or contractor of the Department of Energy who—
“(i) is—
“(ii) is performing official duties of the Department, pursuant to a deployment order issued by the Secretary, to protect the public, property, or the interests of the United States by—
“(I) assessing, locating, identifying, securing, rendering safe, or disposing of weapons of mass destruction (as defined in section 1403 of the Defense Against Weapons of Mass Destruction Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 2302)); or
Section 636(c)(2) of division A of the Treasury, Postal Service, and General Government Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–208; 5 U.S.C. prec. 5941 note) is amended by striking “or under” and all that follows and inserting the following: “a special agent under section 203 of the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 (22 U.S.C. 4823), or a nuclear materials courier (as defined in section 8331(27) of such title 5);”.
Section 5724d(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
Section 4601(c) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2701(c)) is amended by striking “September 30, 2020” and inserting “September 30, 2021”.
(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLV of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2651 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) Procedures for reporting penetrations.—The Administrator shall establish procedures that require each contractor and subcontractor to report to the Chief Information Officer when a covered network of the contractor or subcontractor that meets the criteria established pursuant to subsection (b) is successfully penetrated.
“(b) Establishment of criteria for covered networks.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall, in consultation with the officials specified in paragraph (2), establish criteria for covered networks to be subject to the procedures for reporting penetrations under subsection (a).
“(c) Procedure requirements.—
“(1) RAPID REPORTING.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall require each contractor or subcontractor to submit to the Chief Information Officer a report on each successful penetration of a covered network of the contractor or subcontractor that meets the criteria established pursuant to subsection (b) not later than 60 days after the discovery of the successful penetration.
“(B) ELEMENTS.—Subject to subparagraph (C), each report required by subparagraph (A) with respect to a successful penetration of a covered network of a contractor or subcontractor shall include the following:
“(C) AVOIDANCE OF DELAYS IN REPORTING.—If a contractor or subcontractor is not able to obtain all of the information required by subparagraph (B) to be included in a report required by subparagraph (A) by the date that is 60 days after the discovery of a successful penetration of a covered network of the contractor or subcontractor, the contractor or subcontractor shall—
“(2) ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT AND INFORMATION BY ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL.—Concurrent with the establishment of the procedures pursuant to subsection (a), the Administrator shall establish procedures to be used if information owned by the Administration was in use during or at risk as a result of the successful penetration of a covered network—
“(A) in order to—
“(B) which shall—
“(i) include mechanisms for personnel of the Administration to, upon request, obtain access to equipment or information of a contractor or subcontractor necessary to conduct forensic analysis in addition to any analysis conducted by the contractor or subcontractor;
“(ii) provide that a contractor or subcontractor is only required to provide access to equipment or information as described in clause (i) to determine whether information created by or for the Administration in connection with any program of the Administration was successfully exfiltrated from a network of the contractor or subcontractor and, if so, what information was exfiltrated; and
“(3) DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall allow for limiting the dissemination of information obtained or derived through such procedures so that such information may be disseminated only to entities—
“(d) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER.—The term ‘Chief Information Officer’ means the Associate Administrator for Information Management and Chief Information Officer of the Administration.
“(2) CONTRACTOR.—The term ‘contractor’ means a private entity that has entered into a contract or contractual action of any kind with the Administration to furnish supplies, equipment, materials, or services of any kind.
“(3) COVERED NETWORK.—The term ‘covered network’ includes any network or information system that accesses, receives, or stores—
“(4) SUBCONTRACTOR.—The term ‘subcontractor’ means a private entity that has entered into a contract or contractual action with a contractor or another subcontractor to furnish supplies, equipment, materials, or services of any kind in connection with another contract in support of any program of the Administration.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4510 the following new item:
“Sec. 4511. Reporting on penetrations of networks of contractors and subcontractors.”.
(a) Establishment of Chief Information Officer.—Subtitle B of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2421 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 3232(b)(3) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2422(b)(3)) is amended by striking “and cyber”.
(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLIV of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2581 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“Each year, at the same time that the Department of Energy submits its annual financial report under section 3516 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Energy shall make available to the public a statement of environmental liabilities, as calculated for the most recent audited financial statement of the Department under section 3515 of that title, for each defense nuclear facility at which defense environmental cleanup activities are occurring.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4409 the following new item:
“Sec. 4410. Public statement of environmental liabilities.”.
Section 4402A(b)(3) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2582A(b)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(a) In general.—The Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environmental Management, in consultation with other appropriate officials of the Department of Energy, shall establish requirements for the classification of defense environmental cleanup projects as capital asset projects or operations activities.
(a) In general.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall enter into an arrangement with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a follow-on analysis to the analysis required by section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2769) with respect to approaches for treating the portion of low-activity waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington, intended for supplemental treatment.
(b) Comparison of alternatives to aid decisionmaking.—The analysis required by subsection (a) shall be designed, to the greatest extent possible, to provide decisionmakers with the ability to make a direct comparison between approaches for the supplemental treatment of low-activity waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation based on criteria that are relevant to decisionmaking and most clearly differentiate between approaches.
(c) Elements.—The analysis required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following:
(1) The most effective potential technology for supplemental treatment of low-activity waste that will produce an effective waste form, including an assessment of the following:
(2) The differences among approaches for the supplemental treatment of low-activity waste considered as of the date of the analysis.
(3) The compliance of such approaches with the technical standards described in section 3134(b)(2)(D) of section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017.
(4) The differences among potential disposal sites for the waste form produced through such treatment, including mitigation of radionuclides, including technetium-99, selenium-79, and iodine-129, on a system level.
(5) Potential modifications to the design of facilities to enhance performance with respect to disposal of the waste form to account for the following:
(6) Approximately how much and what type of pretreatment is needed to meet regulatory requirements regarding long-lived radionuclides and hazardous chemicals to reduce disposal costs for radionuclides described in paragraph (4).
(7) Whether the radionuclides can be left in the waste form or economically removed and bounded at a system level by the performance assessment of a potential disposal site and, if the radionuclides cannot be left in the waste form, how to account for the secondary waste stream.
(d) Review, consultation, submission, and limitations.—The provision of subsections (c) through (f) of section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 shall apply with respect to the analysis required by subsection (a) to the same extent and in the same manner that such provisions applied with respect to the analysis required by subsection (a) of such section 3134, except that subsection (e) of such section shall be applied and administered by substituting “the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021” for “the date of the enactment of this Act” each place it appears.
Section 4806 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2786) is amended—
(1) in subsections (a) and (c), by inserting “or special exclusion action” after “covered procurement action” each place it appears;
(4) in subsection (f), as redesignated by paragraph (2)—
(B) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph (6):
“(6) SPECIAL EXCLUSION ACTION.—The term ‘special exclusion action’ means an action to prohibit, for a period not to exceed two years, the award of any contracts or subcontracts by the Administration or any other component of the Department of Energy related to any covered system to a source the Secretary determines to represent a supply chain risk.”.
Section 4811 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2791), as amended by section 3152, is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):
“(d) Prohibition on use of funds for overhead.—Funds provided to a national security laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility for laboratory- or production facility-directed research and development may not be used to cover the costs of general and administrative overhead for the laboratory or facility.”.
(a) Designation of official.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall designate a senior official within the National Nuclear Security Administration to be responsible for monitoring the industrial base that supports the nuclear weapons components, subsystems, and materials of the Administration, including—
(b) Provision of resources.—The Administrator shall ensure that the official designated under subsection (a) is provided with resources sufficient to conduct the monitoring required by that subsection.
(c) Consultations.—The Administrator, acting through the official designated under subsection (a), shall, to the extent practicable and beneficial, in conducting the monitoring required by that subsection, consult with—
(d) Briefings.—
(1) INITIAL BRIEFING.—Not later than April 1, 2021, the Administrator shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on the designation of the official required by subsection (a), including on—
(2) SUBSEQUENT BRIEFINGS.—Not later than April 1, 2022, and annually thereafter through 2024, the Administrator shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a briefing on activities carried out under this section that includes an assessment of the progress made by the official designated under subsection (a) in conducting the monitoring required by that subsection.
(a) In general.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the National Nuclear Security Administration for fiscal year 2021 may be obligated or expended to conduct research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium until the following certifications are submitted to the congressional defense committees:
(1) A joint certification of the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense that the determination made by the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of the Navy pursuant to section 3118(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1196) and submitted to the congressional defense committees on March 25, 2018, that the United States should not pursue such research and development, no longer reflects the policy of the United States.
(b) Report required.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on activities conducted using amounts made available for fiscal year 2020 for nonproliferation fuels development, including a description of progress made toward technological or nonproliferation goals.
In accordance with section 4209(a)(1)(B) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2529(a)(1)(B)), funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2021 for the W93 nuclear warhead program as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(a) In general.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, shall enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Science to review the future of computing beyond exascale computing to meet national security needs at the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(b) Elements.—The review required by subsection (a) shall address the following:
(1) Future computing needs of the National Nuclear Security Administration that exascale computing will not accomplish during the 20 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Information and clearances.—The Administrator shall ensure that personnel of the National Academy of Sciences overseeing the implementation of the agreement required by subsection (a) or conducting the review required by that subsection receive, in a timely manner, access to information and necessary security clearances to enable the conduct of the review.
Section 4217(b)(1) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)(1)) is amended—
SEC. 3159. Integration of stockpile stewardship and nonproliferation missions.
(a) Sense of senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that, in recognition of the close relationships between the nuclear weapons expertise and infrastructure of the national security laboratories (as defined in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501)), those laboratories should continue to apply their capabilities to assessing, understanding, and countering current and emerging nuclear threats, including the nuclear capabilities of adversaries of the United States.
(b) Integration.—The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the capabilities of the stockpile stewardship program under section 4201 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521) are available to assess proliferation challenges, nuclear capabilities of adversaries of the United States, and related safeguards.
The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish a technology development and integration program to improve the safety and security of the nuclear weapons stockpile, and to prevent proliferation, through research and development, engineering, and integration of technologies applicable to multiple weapons systems in the stockpile.
The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish an advanced manufacturing development program to focus on the development, demonstration, and deployment of next-generation processes and manufacturing tools to ensure that the nuclear weapons stockpile is safe and secure.
The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish a materials science program to develop new materials to replace materials that are no longer available for weapons sustainment.
(a) In general.—The Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High Yield Program of the National Nuclear Security Administration (in this section referred to as the “Program”) shall provide the scientific understanding and experimental capabilities required to validate the safety and effectiveness of the nuclear weapons stockpile.
(b) Recommendations relating to high energy density physics.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF WORKING GROUP.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish a working group to identify and implement any recommendations issued by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as required by section 3137 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) In general.—The Administrator shall establish an earned value management program to establish earned value management standards—
“(b) Review of contractor earned value management systems.—The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with an independent entity under which that entity shall review and determine whether the earned value management standards of contractors of the Administration for life extension programs are consistent with the standards established under subsection (a).
“(c) Reconciliation of cost estimates.—The Administrator shall ensure that key decisions of the Administration concerning project milestones in life extension programs are based on a reconciliation of cost estimates of the Administration with any independent cost estimates conducted by the Director of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4222 the following new item:
“Sec. 4223. Earned value management program for life extension programs.”.
The Secretary of Energy shall make the unclassified high performance computing capabilities of the Department of Energy available for research relating to the coronavirus disease 2019 (commonly known as “COVID–19”) so long as and to the extent that doing so does not negatively affect the stockpile stewardship mission of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
From amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 3101 and available, as specified in the funding table in section 4701, for the Stockpile Responsiveness Program under section 4220 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2538b), not less than $10,000,000 shall be made available to carry out projects related to reducing the time required to execute a nuclear test if necessary.
It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) a secure nuclear fuel supply chain is essential to the economic and national security of the United States;
(2) the United States should—
(A) expeditiously complete negotiation of an extension of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Investigation on Uranium from the Russian Federation (commonly referred to as the “Russian Suspension Agreement”); or
(B) if an agreement to extend the Russian Suspension Agreement cannot be reached, complete the antidumping investigation under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671 et seq.) with respect to imports of uranium from the Russian Federation—
(3) a renegotiated, long-term extension of the Russian Suspension Agreement can prevent adversaries of the United States from monopolizing the nuclear fuel supply chain;
(4) as was done in 2008, upon completion of a new negotiated long-term extension of the Russian Suspension Agreement, Congress should enact legislation to codify the terms of extension into law to ensure long-term stability for the domestic nuclear fuel supply chain; and
(5) if the negotiations to extend the Russian Suspension Agreement prove unsuccessful, Congress should be prepared to enact legislation to prevent the manipulation by the Russian Federation of global uranium markets and potential domination by the Russian Federation of the United States uranium market.
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021, $28,836,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).
Section 313 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286b) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(k) Nonpublic collaborative discussions.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 552b of title 5, United States Code, a quorum of the members of the Board may hold a meeting that is not open to public observation to discuss official business of the Board if—
“(2) DISCLOSURE OF NONPUBLIC COLLABORATIVE DISCUSSIONS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided by subparagraph (B), not later than two business days after the conclusion of a meeting described in paragraph (1), the Board shall make available to the public, in a place easily accessible to the public—
“(B) INFORMATION ABOUT MATTERS WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC.—If the Board properly determines under subparagraph (A)(ii) that a matter may be withheld from the public under section 552b(c) of title 5, United States Code, the Board shall include in the summary required by that subparagraph as much general information as possible with respect to the matter.
(a) Mission of Board.—Section 312(a) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286a(a)) is amended by striking “employees and contractors at such facilities” and inserting “workers at such facilities conducting activities covered by part 830 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation)”.
(b) Cooperation.—Section 314(a) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286c(a)) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘unfettered access’, with respect to a facility or personnel of or information related to a facility, means access equivalent to the access to the facility, personnel, or information provided to a regular employee of the facility, after proper identification and compliance with applicable access control measures for security, radiological protection, and personal safety.”.
Section 109 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 109. Maritime Administration
“(a) Organization and mission.—The Maritime Administration is an administration in the Department of Transportation. The mission of the Maritime Administration is to foster, promote, and develop the merchant maritime industry of the United States.
“(b) Maritime Administrator.—The head of the Maritime Administration is the Maritime Administrator, who is appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Administrator shall report directly to the Secretary of Transportation and carry out the duties prescribed by the Secretary.
“(c) Deputy Maritime Administrator.—The Maritime Administration shall have a Deputy Maritime Administrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall carry out the duties prescribed by the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall be Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates another individual, during a vacancy in the office of Administrator.
“(d) Duties and powers vested in Secretary.—All duties and powers of the Maritime Administration are vested in the Secretary.
“(e) Regional offices.—The Maritime Administration shall have regional offices for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have other regional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a qualified individual as Director of each regional office. The Secretary shall carry out appropriate activities and programs of the Maritime Administration through the regional offices.
“(f) Interagency and industry relations.—The Secretary shall establish and maintain liaison with other agencies, and with representative trade organizations throughout the United States, concerned with the transportation of commodities by water in the export and import foreign commerce of the United States, for the purpose of securing preference to vessels of the United States for the transportation of those commodities.
“(g) Detailing officers from Armed Forces.—To assist the Secretary in carrying out duties and powers relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than five officers of the Armed Forces may be detailed to the Secretary at any one time, in addition to details authorized by any other law. During the period of a detail, the Secretary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added to the officer's pay and allowances as an officer in the Armed Forces, makes the officer's total pay and allowances equal to the amount that would be paid to an individual performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar importance, difficulty, and responsibility as that performed by the officer during the detail.
“(h) Contracts, cooperative agreements, and audits.—
“(1) CONTRACTS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—In the same manner that a private corporation may make a contract within the scope of its authority under its charter, the Secretary may make contracts and cooperative agreements for the United States Government and disburse amounts to—
“(2) AUDITS.—The financial transactions of the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by the Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall allow credit for an expenditure shown to be necessary because of the nature of the business activities authorized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46.
“(i) Grant administrative expenses.—Except as otherwise provided by law, the administrative and related expenses for the administration of any grant programs by the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent.
“(j) Authorization of appropriations.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to the Maritime Administration.
“(2) LIMITATIONS.—Only those amounts specifically authorized by law may be appropriated for the use of the Maritime Administration for—
“(B) construction-differential subsidies incident to the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of vessels;
(a) In general.—Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
(b) Merit-based decisions.—A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
(c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts.
| SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| FIXED WING | |||||||
| 2 | MQ–1 UAV | 0 | 165,000 | ||||
| Reverse planned temporary procurement pause | [165,000] | ||||||
| 3 | FUTURE UAS FAMILY | 1,100 | 1,100 | ||||
| 4 | RQ–11 (RAVEN) | 20,851 | 20,851 | ||||
| ROTARY | |||||||
| 7 | AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN | 792,027 | 792,027 | ||||
| 8 | AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN AP | 169,460 | 169,460 | ||||
| 11 | UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) | 742,998 | 742,998 | ||||
| 12 | UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) AP | 87,427 | 87,427 | ||||
| 13 | UH–60 BLACK HAWK L AND V MODELS | 172,797 | 172,797 | ||||
| 14 | CH–47 HELICOPTER | 160,750 | 160,750 | ||||
| 15 | CH–47 HELICOPTER AP | 18,372 | 18,372 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 18 | UNIVERSAL GROUND CONTROL EQUIPMENT (UAS) | 7,509 | 7,509 | ||||
| 19 | GRAY EAGLE MODS2 | 16,280 | 16,280 | ||||
| 20 | MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) | 35,864 | 35,864 | ||||
| 21 | AH–64 MODS | 118,316 | 118,316 | ||||
| 22 | CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) | 15,548 | 35,548 | ||||
| IVCS | [20,000] | ||||||
| 23 | GRCS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 2,947 | 2,947 | ||||
| 24 | ARL SEMA MODS (MIP) | 9,598 | 9,598 | ||||
| 25 | EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 2,452 | 2,452 | ||||
| 26 | UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS | 13,868 | 13,868 | ||||
| 27 | UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS | 25,842 | 25,842 | ||||
| 28 | NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN | 77,432 | 77,432 | ||||
| 29 | COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE | 101,355 | 101,355 | ||||
| 31 | AVIATION ASSURED PNT | 54,609 | 54,609 | ||||
| 32 | GATM ROLLUP | 12,180 | 12,180 | ||||
| 34 | UAS MODS | 4,204 | 4,204 | ||||
| GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS | |||||||
| 35 | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT | 49,455 | 49,455 | ||||
| 36 | SURVIVABILITY CM | 8,035 | 8,035 | ||||
| 37 | CMWS | 10,567 | 10,567 | ||||
| 38 | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 237,467 | 237,467 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 39 | AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,789 | 1,789 | ||||
| 40 | COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT | 17,584 | 17,584 | ||||
| 41 | AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS | 48,265 | 48,265 | ||||
| 42 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 26,408 | 26,408 | ||||
| 44 | LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET | 2,256 | 2,256 | ||||
| 45 | LAUNCHER GUIDED MISSILE: LONGBOW HELLFIRE XM2 | 8,982 | 8,982 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 3,074,594 | 3,259,594 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 2 | M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT | 378,654 | 378,654 | ||||
| 3 | MSE MISSILE | 603,188 | 779,773 | ||||
| Transfer missiles from EDI OCO | [176,585] | ||||||
| 4 | PRECISION STRIKE MISSILE (PRSM) | 49,941 | 49,941 | ||||
| 5 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2–I | 106,261 | 65,761 | ||||
| Army-identified funding early to need | [–40,500] | ||||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 6 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 91,225 | 91,225 | ||||
| 7 | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS (JAGM) | 213,397 | 213,397 | ||||
| 8 | LONG RANGE PRECISION MUNITION | 45,307 | 45,307 | ||||
| ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS | |||||||
| 9 | JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY | 190,325 | 190,325 | ||||
| 10 | TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY | 121,074 | 121,074 | ||||
| 11 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 850,157 | 850,157 | ||||
| 12 | MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) | 30,836 | 30,836 | ||||
| 13 | HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM (HIMARS | 41,226 | 41,226 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 16 | PATRIOT MODS | 278,050 | 278,050 | ||||
| 17 | ATACMS MODS | 141,690 | 141,690 | ||||
| 20 | AVENGER MODS | 13,942 | 13,942 | ||||
| 21 | ITAS/TOW MODS | 5,666 | 5,666 | ||||
| 22 | MLRS MODS | 310,419 | 310,419 | ||||
| 23 | HIMARS MODIFICATIONS | 6,081 | 6,081 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 24 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 5,090 | 5,090 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 25 | AIR DEFENSE TARGETS | 8,978 | 8,978 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 3,491,507 | 3,627,592 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 2 | ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) | 192,971 | 172,971 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–20,000] | ||||||
| MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 4 | STRYKER UPGRADE | 847,212 | 847,212 | ||||
| 5 | BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) | 493,109 | 473,109 | ||||
| UBIS slip | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 6 | M109 FOV MODIFICATIONS | 26,893 | 26,893 | ||||
| 7 | PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) | 435,825 | 435,825 | ||||
| 9 | ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) | 5,074 | 5,074 | ||||
| 10 | ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE | 19,500 | 19,500 | ||||
| 11 | M88 FOV MODS | 18,382 | 13,382 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 12 | JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE | 72,178 | 61,678 | ||||
| IOTE and testing delay | [–10,500] | ||||||
| 13 | M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) | 392,013 | 392,013 | ||||
| 14 | ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM | 1,033,253 | 1,033,253 | ||||
| WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 16 | MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON S | 17,864 | 17,864 | ||||
| 18 | MORTAR SYSTEMS | 10,288 | 10,288 | ||||
| 19 | XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) | 5,969 | 5,969 | ||||
| 20 | PRECISION SNIPER RIFLE | 10,137 | 10,137 | ||||
| 21 | COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM | 999 | 999 | ||||
| 22 | CARBINE | 7,411 | 7,411 | ||||
| 23 | NEXT GENERATION SQUAD WEAPON | 35,822 | 35,822 | ||||
| 24 | COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION | 24,534 | 24,534 | ||||
| 25 | HANDGUN | 4,662 | 4,662 | ||||
| MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH | |||||||
| 26 | MK–19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS | 6,444 | 6,444 | ||||
| 27 | M777 MODS | 10,983 | 10,983 | ||||
| 28 | M4 CARBINE MODS | 4,824 | 4,824 | ||||
| 31 | M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS | 6,385 | 6,385 | ||||
| 32 | SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS | 1,898 | 1,898 | ||||
| 33 | M119 MODIFICATIONS | 2,009 | 2,009 | ||||
| 34 | MORTAR MODIFICATION | 1,689 | 1,689 | ||||
| 35 | MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) | 2,604 | 2,604 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 36 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) | 2,763 | 2,763 | ||||
| 37 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) | 3,045 | 3,045 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | 3,696,740 | 3,641,240 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 1 | CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES | 68,472 | 68,472 | ||||
| 2 | CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES | 109,933 | 109,933 | ||||
| 3 | NEXT GENERATION SQUAD WEAPON AMMUNITION | 11,988 | 11,988 | ||||
| 4 | CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES | 853 | 853 | ||||
| 5 | CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES | 58,280 | 58,280 | ||||
| 6 | CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES | 31,708 | 31,708 | ||||
| 7 | CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES | 9,111 | 9,111 | ||||
| 8 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 58,172 | 58,172 | ||||
| 9 | CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES | 114,638 | 114,638 | ||||
| MORTAR AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 10 | 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 31,222 | 31,222 | ||||
| 11 | 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 42,857 | 42,857 | ||||
| 12 | 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 107,762 | 107,762 | ||||
| TANK AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 13 | CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES | 233,444 | 233,444 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 14 | ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES | 35,963 | 35,963 | ||||
| 15 | ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES | 293,692 | 293,692 | ||||
| 16 | PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 | 69,159 | 69,159 | ||||
| 17 | ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL | 232,913 | 232,913 | ||||
| MINES | |||||||
| 18 | MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES | 65,278 | 65,278 | ||||
| 19 | CLOSE TERRAIN SHAPING OBSTACLE | 4,995 | 4,995 | ||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 20 | SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 69,112 | 69,112 | ||||
| 21 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 125,915 | 125,915 | ||||
| OTHER AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 22 | CAD/PAD, ALL TYPES | 8,891 | 8,891 | ||||
| 23 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 54,043 | 54,043 | ||||
| 24 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 28,931 | 28,931 | ||||
| 25 | SIGNALS, ALL TYPES | 27,036 | 27,036 | ||||
| 26 | SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES | 10,253 | 10,253 | ||||
| MISCELLANEOUS | |||||||
| 27 | AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES | 3,476 | 3,476 | ||||
| 29 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) | 10,569 | 10,569 | ||||
| 30 | AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT | 12,338 | 12,338 | ||||
| 31 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) | 15,908 | 15,908 | ||||
| 32 | CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES | 99 | 99 | ||||
| PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 33 | INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 592,224 | 592,224 | ||||
| 34 | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION | 235,112 | 235,112 | ||||
| 35 | ARMS INITIATIVE | 3,369 | 3,369 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 2,777,716 | 2,777,716 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 1 | TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS | 12,986 | 12,986 | ||||
| 2 | SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: | 31,443 | 31,443 | ||||
| 3 | SEMITRAILERS, TANKERS | 17,082 | 17,082 | ||||
| 4 | HI MOB MULTI-PURP WHLD VEH (HMMWV) | 44,795 | 44,795 | ||||
| 5 | GROUND MOBILITY VEHICLES (GMV) | 37,932 | 37,932 | ||||
| 8 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE FAMILY OF VEHICL | 894,414 | 894,414 | ||||
| 9 | TRUCK, DUMP, 20T (CCE) | 29,368 | 29,368 | ||||
| 10 | FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) | 95,092 | 95,092 | ||||
| 11 | FAMILY OF COLD WEATHER ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE (C | 999 | 999 | ||||
| 12 | FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP | 27,687 | 27,687 | ||||
| 14 | PLS ESP | 21,969 | 21,969 | ||||
| 15 | HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV | 65,635 | 65,635 | ||||
| 16 | HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM | 5,927 | 5,927 | ||||
| 17 | TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS | 36,497 | 36,497 | ||||
| 18 | MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP | 114,977 | 114,977 | ||||
| NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 20 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 1,246 | 1,246 | ||||
| 21 | NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER | 19,870 | 19,870 | ||||
| COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 22 | SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 160,469 | 160,469 | ||||
| 23 | TACTICAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY MOD IN SVC | 360,379 | 365,379 | ||||
| MDTF scalable node equipment | [5,000] | ||||||
| 24 | SITUATION INFORMATION TRANSPORT | 63,396 | 63,396 | ||||
| 26 | JCSE EQUIPMENT (USRDECOM) | 5,170 | 5,170 | ||||
| COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 29 | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS | 101,498 | 101,498 | ||||
| 30 | TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS | 72,450 | 74,850 | ||||
| AFRICOM force protection upgrades | [1,000] | ||||||
| MDTF support requirements | [1,400] | ||||||
| 31 | SHF TERM | 13,173 | 13,173 | ||||
| 32 | ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING | 134,928 | 134,928 | ||||
| 33 | SMART-T (SPACE) | 8,611 | 8,611 | ||||
| 34 | GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS | 8,191 | 8,191 | ||||
| COMM—C3 SYSTEM | |||||||
| 36 | COE TACTICAL SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE (TSI) | 94,871 | 94,871 | ||||
| COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 37 | HANDHELD MANPACK SMALL FORM FIT (HMS) | 550,848 | 552,348 | ||||
| AFRICOM force protection upgrades | [1,500] | ||||||
| 38 | RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) | 8,237 | 8,237 | ||||
| 41 | SPIDER FAMILY OF NETWORKED MUNITIONS INCR | 13,967 | 0 | ||||
| Program cancelation | [–13,967] | ||||||
| 43 | UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE | 19,579 | 19,579 | ||||
| 44 | COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT | 94,156 | 94,156 | ||||
| 45 | FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE | 18,313 | 18,313 | ||||
| 46 | ARMY COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONICS | 51,480 | 51,480 | ||||
| COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM | |||||||
| 48 | CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) | 13,146 | 13,146 | ||||
| 49 | DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE | 5,624 | 5,624 | ||||
| INFORMATION SECURITY | |||||||
| 51 | INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP | 4,596 | 4,596 | ||||
| 52 | COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) | 159,272 | 159,272 | ||||
| 53 | DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS | 54,753 | 55,653 | ||||
| MDTF cyber defense and EW tools | [900] | ||||||
| 54 | INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM—UNIT ACTIVITY MONITO | 1,760 | 1,760 | ||||
| 56 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (INFO SECURITY) | 260 | 260 | ||||
| COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 57 | BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS | 29,761 | 30,761 | ||||
| AFRICOM UFR force protection upgrades | [1,000] | ||||||
| COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 58 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 147,696 | 147,696 | ||||
| 59 | EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 4,900 | 4,900 | ||||
| 60 | HOME STATION MISSION COMMAND CENTERS (HSMCC) | 15,227 | 15,227 | ||||
| 61 | JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (JIE) | 3,177 | 3,177 | ||||
| 62 | INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM | 300,035 | 300,035 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) | |||||||
| 65 | JTT/CIBS-M (MIP) | 5,304 | 5,304 | ||||
| 66 | TERRESTRIAL LAYER SYSTEMS (TLS) (MIP) | 8,081 | 8,081 | ||||
| 68 | DCGS-A (MIP) | 151,886 | 151,886 | ||||
| 70 | TROJAN (MIP) | 17,593 | 17,593 | ||||
| 71 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) | 28,558 | 28,558 | ||||
| 73 | BIOMETRIC TACTICAL COLLECTION DEVICES (MIP) | 999 | 999 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) | |||||||
| 75 | LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR | 5,332 | 5,332 | ||||
| 76 | EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) | 7,849 | 7,849 | ||||
| 77 | AIR VIGILANCE (AV) (MIP) | 8,160 | 8,160 | ||||
| 79 | MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRONIC WARFARE (MFEW) SYST | 8,669 | 8,669 | ||||
| 81 | COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES | 0 | 13,400 | ||||
| MDTF advanced intel systems remote collection | [13,400] | ||||||
| 82 | CI MODERNIZATION (MIP) | 300 | 300 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) | |||||||
| 83 | SENTINEL MODS | 58,884 | 58,884 | ||||
| 84 | NIGHT VISION DEVICES | 1,127,375 | 1,127,375 | ||||
| 86 | SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF | 13,954 | 13,954 | ||||
| 88 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS | 10,069 | 14,069 | ||||
| AFRICOM UFR force protection upgrades | [4,000] | ||||||
| 89 | FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS) | 133,590 | 133,590 | ||||
| 91 | JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) | 243,850 | 243,850 | ||||
| 92 | JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS) | 69,641 | 69,641 | ||||
| 94 | COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 | 7,509 | 7,509 | ||||
| 95 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM | 3,800 | 3,800 | ||||
| 96 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS MODIFICATIONS | 7,292 | 7,292 | ||||
| 97 | COUNTERFIRE RADARS | 72,421 | 72,421 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 98 | ARMY COMMAND POST INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE ( | 49,947 | 49,947 | ||||
| 99 | FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY | 9,390 | 9,390 | ||||
| 100 | AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS | 47,374 | 47,374 | ||||
| 101 | IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM | 201,587 | 201,587 | ||||
| 102 | LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) | 4,495 | 4,495 | ||||
| 103 | NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE | 18,651 | 18,651 | ||||
| 105 | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) | 2,792 | 2,792 | ||||
| 106 | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP | 9,071 | 9,071 | ||||
| 107 | RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET | 12,117 | 12,117 | ||||
| 108 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (ENFIRE) | 3,004 | 3,004 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION | |||||||
| 109 | ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION | 14,574 | 14,574 | ||||
| 110 | AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP | 140,619 | 140,619 | ||||
| 111 | GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM | 4,448 | 4,448 | ||||
| 112 | HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) | 68,405 | 68,405 | ||||
| 113 | CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM | 8,459 | 8,459 | ||||
| 114 | CSS COMMUNICATIONS | 57,651 | 57,651 | ||||
| 115 | RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) | 14,848 | 14,848 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) | |||||||
| 117 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) | 4,995 | 4,995 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT | |||||||
| 119 | BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES | 16,983 | 20,883 | ||||
| MDTF advanced intel systems remote collection | [3,900] | ||||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,582 | 1,582 | ||||
| CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 123 | CBRN DEFENSE | 28,456 | 42,456 | ||||
| WMD CST equipment | [14,000] | ||||||
| 124 | SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON AAO ITEM) | 13,995 | 13,995 | ||||
| BRIDGING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 125 | TACTICAL BRIDGING | 10,545 | 10,545 | ||||
| 126 | TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON | 72,074 | 72,074 | ||||
| 127 | BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SET | 32,493 | 32,493 | ||||
| 128 | COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP | 62,978 | 62,978 | ||||
| ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 129 | HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION SYS-HST | 5,570 | 5,570 | ||||
| 130 | GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) | 2,497 | 2,497 | ||||
| 132 | HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) | 109,069 | 109,069 | ||||
| 134 | EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION | 36,584 | 36,584 | ||||
| 135 | ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS | 179,544 | 179,544 | ||||
| 137 | RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS | 64,583 | 64,583 | ||||
| 139 | FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS | 5,289 | 5,289 | ||||
| COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 140 | HEATERS AND ECU'S | 8,200 | 8,200 | ||||
| 142 | PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) | 4,625 | 4,625 | ||||
| 143 | GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM | 154,937 | 154,937 | ||||
| 144 | MOBILE SOLDIER POWER | 34,297 | 34,297 | ||||
| 147 | CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM | 53,021 | 53,021 | ||||
| 148 | FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS | 23,324 | 23,324 | ||||
| 149 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) | 8,014 | 8,014 | ||||
| PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 150 | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER | 78,448 | 78,448 | ||||
| MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 151 | COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL | 59,485 | 59,485 | ||||
| MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 152 | MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS | 40,337 | 40,337 | ||||
| 153 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) | 5,386 | 5,386 | ||||
| CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 154 | GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) | 5,406 | 5,406 | ||||
| 155 | SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING | 4,188 | 4,188 | ||||
| 156 | LOADERS | 4,521 | 4,521 | ||||
| 157 | HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR | 5,186 | 5,186 | ||||
| 158 | TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED | 4,715 | 4,715 | ||||
| 159 | ALL TERRAIN CRANES | 70,560 | 70,560 | ||||
| 162 | CONST EQUIP ESP | 8,925 | 8,925 | ||||
| RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 164 | ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP | 40,910 | 40,910 | ||||
| 165 | MANEUVER SUPPORT VESSEL (MSV) | 76,576 | 76,576 | ||||
| 166 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) | 1,844 | 1,844 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 167 | GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP | 53,433 | 53,433 | ||||
| 168 | TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWER RECAPITALIZATION | 22,216 | 22,216 | ||||
| MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 169 | FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS | 16,145 | 16,145 | ||||
| TRAINING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 170 | COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT | 90,580 | 90,580 | ||||
| 171 | TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM | 161,814 | 161,814 | ||||
| 172 | SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (STE) | 13,063 | 13,063 | ||||
| 175 | GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING | 1,950 | 1,950 | ||||
| TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) | |||||||
| 176 | CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT | 2,511 | 2,511 | ||||
| 177 | INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) | 78,578 | 78,578 | ||||
| 178 | TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) | 14,941 | 14,941 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 180 | RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 8,629 | 8,629 | ||||
| 181 | PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) | 75,499 | 87,499 | ||||
| AFRICOM UFR force protection upgrades | [12,000] | ||||||
| 182 | BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT | 27,444 | 27,444 | ||||
| 183 | MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) | 32,485 | 48,385 | ||||
| Expeditionary Solid Waste Disposal System | [15,900] | ||||||
| 187 | SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR TEST AND EVALUATION | 39,436 | 39,436 | ||||
| OPA2 | |||||||
| 189 | INITIAL SPARES—C&E | 9,950 | 9,950 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 8,625,206 | 8,685,239 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| COMBAT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 1 | F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET | 1,761,146 | 1,761,146 | ||||
| 3 | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV | 2,181,780 | 2,381,780 | ||||
| Additional aircraft | [200,000] | ||||||
| 4 | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV AP | 330,386 | 330,386 | ||||
| 5 | JSF STOVL | 1,109,393 | 1,234,893 | ||||
| Additional 2 F–35B aircraft | [125,500] | ||||||
| 6 | JSF STOVL AP | 303,035 | 303,035 | ||||
| 7 | CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) | 813,324 | 793,324 | ||||
| Force Design 2030 realignment NRE excess | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 8 | CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) AP | 201,188 | 191,188 | ||||
| Force Design 2030 realignment | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 9 | V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) | 934,793 | 934,793 | ||||
| 10 | V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) AP | 39,547 | 39,547 | ||||
| 11 | H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) | 7,267 | 7,267 | ||||
| 13 | P–8A POSEIDON | 80,134 | 80,134 | ||||
| 15 | E–2D ADV HAWKEYE | 626,109 | 626,109 | ||||
| 16 | E–2D ADV HAWKEYE AP | 123,166 | 123,166 | ||||
| TRAINER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 17 | ADVANCED HELICOPTER TRAINING SYSTEM | 269,867 | 269,867 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 18 | KC–130J | 380,984 | 380,984 | ||||
| 19 | KC–130J AP | 67,022 | 67,022 | ||||
| 21 | MQ–4 TRITON | 150,570 | 100,570 | ||||
| Excess funding given procurement pause until FY23 | [–50,000] | ||||||
| 23 | MQ–8 UAV | 40,375 | 40,375 | ||||
| 24 | STUASL0 UAV | 30,930 | 30,930 | ||||
| 26 | VH–92A EXECUTIVE HELO | 610,231 | 610,231 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 28 | F–18 A-D UNIQUE | 208,261 | 208,261 | ||||
| 29 | F–18E/F AND EA–18G MODERNIZATION AND SUSTAINM | 468,954 | 468,954 | ||||
| 30 | AEA SYSTEMS | 21,061 | 21,061 | ||||
| 31 | AV–8 SERIES | 34,082 | 34,082 | ||||
| 32 | INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) | 158,055 | 158,055 | ||||
| 33 | ADVERSARY | 42,946 | 42,946 | ||||
| 34 | F–18 SERIES | 379,351 | 379,351 | ||||
| 35 | H–53 SERIES | 74,771 | 74,771 | ||||
| 36 | MH–60 SERIES | 131,584 | 131,584 | ||||
| 37 | H–1 SERIES | 185,140 | 185,140 | ||||
| 38 | EP–3 SERIES | 26,602 | 26,602 | ||||
| 40 | E–2 SERIES | 175,540 | 175,540 | ||||
| 41 | TRAINER A/C SERIES | 7,085 | 7,085 | ||||
| 42 | C–2A | 9,525 | 9,525 | ||||
| 43 | C–130 SERIES | 141,705 | 141,705 | ||||
| 44 | FEWSG | 684 | 684 | ||||
| 45 | CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES | 8,911 | 8,911 | ||||
| 46 | E–6 SERIES | 197,206 | 197,206 | ||||
| 47 | EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES | 29,086 | 29,086 | ||||
| 49 | T–45 SERIES | 155,745 | 155,745 | ||||
| 50 | POWER PLANT CHANGES | 24,633 | 24,633 | ||||
| 51 | JPATS SERIES | 22,682 | 22,682 | ||||
| 52 | AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS | 40,401 | 45,401 | ||||
| Aviation body armor vest | [5,000] | ||||||
| 53 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 138,480 | 138,480 | ||||
| 54 | COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES | 143,322 | 143,322 | ||||
| 55 | COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM | 2,142 | 2,142 | ||||
| 56 | ID SYSTEMS | 35,999 | 35,999 | ||||
| 57 | P–8 SERIES | 180,530 | 180,530 | ||||
| 58 | MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION | 27,794 | 27,794 | ||||
| 59 | MQ–8 SERIES | 28,774 | 28,774 | ||||
| 60 | V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY | 334,405 | 334,405 | ||||
| 61 | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) | 176,638 | 176,638 | ||||
| 62 | F–35 STOVL SERIES | 153,588 | 153,588 | ||||
| 63 | F–35 CV SERIES | 105,452 | 105,452 | ||||
| 64 | QRC | 126,618 | 126,618 | ||||
| 65 | MQ–4 SERIES | 12,998 | 12,998 | ||||
| 66 | RQ–21 SERIES | 18,550 | 18,550 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 70 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 2,198,460 | 2,228,460 | ||||
| Additional F–35B/C spares | [30,000] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 71 | COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT | 543,559 | 543,559 | ||||
| 72 | AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 75,685 | 75,685 | ||||
| 73 | WAR CONSUMABLES | 40,633 | 40,633 | ||||
| 74 | OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | 21,194 | 21,194 | ||||
| 75 | SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 155,179 | 155,179 | ||||
| 76 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 2,121 | 2,121 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 17,127,378 | 17,407,878 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| MODIFICATION OF MISSILES | |||||||
| 1 | TRIDENT II MODS | 1,173,837 | 1,173,837 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 2 | MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 7,275 | 7,275 | ||||
| STRATEGIC MISSILES | |||||||
| 3 | TOMAHAWK | 277,694 | 303,694 | ||||
| Program increase for USMC Tomahawk | [26,000] | ||||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 4 | AMRAAM | 326,952 | 326,952 | ||||
| 5 | SIDEWINDER | 126,485 | 126,485 | ||||
| 7 | STANDARD MISSILE | 456,206 | 456,206 | ||||
| 8 | STANDARD MISSILE AP | 66,716 | 66,716 | ||||
| 9 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II | 78,867 | 78,867 | ||||
| 10 | RAM | 90,533 | 90,533 | ||||
| 11 | JOINT AIR GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 49,386 | 49,386 | ||||
| 14 | AERIAL TARGETS | 174,336 | 174,336 | ||||
| 15 | DRONES AND DECOYS | 41,256 | 41,256 | ||||
| 16 | OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT | 3,501 | 3,501 | ||||
| 17 | LRASM | 168,845 | 203,845 | ||||
| Additional Navy LRASM missiles | [35,000] | ||||||
| 18 | LCS OTH MISSILE | 32,910 | 32,910 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF MISSILES | |||||||
| 19 | TOMAHAWK MODS | 164,915 | 164,915 | ||||
| 20 | ESSM | 215,375 | 215,375 | ||||
| 22 | HARM MODS | 147,572 | 147,572 | ||||
| 23 | STANDARD MISSILES MODS | 83,654 | 83,654 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 24 | WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 1,996 | 1,996 | ||||
| 25 | FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON | 53,401 | 53,401 | ||||
| ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 27 | ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 215,659 | 215,659 | ||||
| TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP | |||||||
| 28 | SSTD | 5,811 | 3,611 | ||||
| Insufficient justification for ADC non-recurring costs | [–2,200] | ||||||
| 29 | MK–48 TORPEDO | 284,901 | 284,901 | ||||
| 30 | ASW TARGETS | 13,833 | 13,833 | ||||
| MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP | |||||||
| 31 | MK–54 TORPEDO MODS | 110,286 | 100,286 | ||||
| Mk 54 Mod 0 production delays | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 32 | MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS | 57,214 | 57,214 | ||||
| 33 | MARITIME MINES | 5,832 | 5,832 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 34 | TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 97,581 | 97,581 | ||||
| 35 | ASW RANGE SUPPORT | 4,159 | 4,159 | ||||
| DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | |||||||
| 36 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 4,106 | 4,106 | ||||
| GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS | |||||||
| 37 | SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS | 16,030 | 16,030 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS | |||||||
| 38 | CIWS MODS | 37,147 | 37,147 | ||||
| 39 | COAST GUARD WEAPONS | 45,804 | 45,804 | ||||
| 40 | GUN MOUNT MODS | 74,427 | 74,427 | ||||
| 41 | LCS MODULE WEAPONS | 4,253 | 4,253 | ||||
| 42 | AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS | 6,662 | 6,662 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 45 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 159,578 | 159,578 | ||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 4,884,995 | 4,933,795 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 1 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 41,496 | 41,496 | ||||
| 2 | JDAM | 64,631 | 64,631 | ||||
| 3 | AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 60,719 | 60,719 | ||||
| 4 | MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION | 11,158 | 11,158 | ||||
| 5 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 51,409 | 51,409 | ||||
| 6 | CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES | 64,694 | 64,694 | ||||
| 7 | AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES | 51,523 | 51,523 | ||||
| 8 | JATOS | 6,761 | 6,761 | ||||
| 9 | 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION | 31,517 | 31,517 | ||||
| 10 | INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION | 38,005 | 38,005 | ||||
| 11 | OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION | 40,626 | 40,626 | ||||
| 12 | SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO | 48,202 | 48,202 | ||||
| 13 | PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION | 9,766 | 9,766 | ||||
| 15 | AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 2,115 | 2,115 | ||||
| MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 16 | MORTARS | 46,781 | 46,781 | ||||
| 17 | DIRECT SUPPORT MUNITIONS | 119,504 | 119,504 | ||||
| 18 | INFANTRY WEAPONS AMMUNITION | 83,220 | 83,220 | ||||
| 19 | COMBAT SUPPORT MUNITIONS | 32,650 | 32,650 | ||||
| 20 | AMMO MODERNIZATION | 15,144 | 15,144 | ||||
| 21 | ARTILLERY MUNITIONS | 59,539 | 59,539 | ||||
| 22 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 4,142 | 4,142 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 883,602 | 883,602 | |||||
| SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY | |||||||
| FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE SHIPS | |||||||
| 1 | OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE | 2,891,475 | 2,891,475 | ||||
| 2 | OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE AP | 1,123,175 | 1,298,175 | ||||
| Submarine supplier stability | [175,000] | ||||||
| OTHER WARSHIPS | |||||||
| 3 | CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM | 997,544 | 997,544 | ||||
| 4 | CVN–81 | 1,645,606 | 1,645,606 | ||||
| 5 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE | 2,334,693 | 2,260,293 | ||||
| Unjustified cost growth | [–74,400] | ||||||
| 6 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE AP | 1,901,187 | 2,373,187 | ||||
| Long lead material for option ship | [472,000] | ||||||
| 7 | CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS | 1,878,453 | 1,878,453 | ||||
| 8 | CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS AP | 17,384 | 17,384 | ||||
| 9 | DDG 1000 | 78,205 | 78,205 | ||||
| 10 | DDG–51 | 3,040,270 | 3,010,270 | ||||
| Available prior-year funds | [–30,000] | ||||||
| 11 | DDG–51 AP | 29,297 | 464,297 | ||||
| LLTM for FY22 DDG–51s | [260,000] | ||||||
| Surface ship supplier stability | [175,000] | ||||||
| 13 | FFG-FRIGATE | 1,053,123 | 1,053,123 | ||||
| AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS | |||||||
| 14 | LPD FLIGHT II | 1,155,801 | 905,801 | ||||
| Transfer to Line 15 | [–250,000] | ||||||
| 15 | LPD FLIGHT II AP | 0 | 500,000 | ||||
| LPD–32 and LPD–33 program increase | [250,000] | ||||||
| Transfer from Line 14 for LPD–32 and LPD–33 | [250,000] | ||||||
| 17 | LHA REPLACEMENT | 0 | 250,000 | ||||
| LHA–9 program increase | [250,000] | ||||||
| AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST | |||||||
| 22 | TOWING, SALVAGE, AND RESCUE SHIP (ATS) | 168,209 | 168,209 | ||||
| 23 | LCU 1700 | 87,395 | 70,395 | ||||
| Insufficient justification | [–17,000] | ||||||
| 24 | OUTFITTING | 825,586 | 747,286 | ||||
| Unjustified cost growth | [–78,300] | ||||||
| 26 | SERVICE CRAFT | 249,781 | 275,281 | ||||
| Accelerate YP–703 Flight II | [25,500] | ||||||
| 27 | LCAC SLEP | 56,461 | 0 | ||||
| Insufficient justification | [–56,461] | ||||||
| 28 | COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS | 369,112 | 369,112 | ||||
| TOTAL SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY | 19,902,757 | 21,254,096 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 1 | SURFACE POWER EQUIPMENT | 11,738 | 11,738 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 2 | SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E | 58,497 | 38,497 | ||||
| Hardware and software upgrades for 5 previously procured HED ship sets | [15,000] | ||||||
| HED installation early to need | [–35,000] | ||||||
| NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 3 | OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT | 74,084 | 74,084 | ||||
| OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 4 | SUB PERISCOPE, IMAGING AND SUPT EQUIP PROG | 204,806 | 204,806 | ||||
| 5 | DDG MOD | 547,569 | 497,569 | ||||
| Installation excess unit cost growth | [–50,000] | ||||||
| 6 | FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 18,394 | 18,394 | ||||
| 7 | COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD | 2,374 | 2,374 | ||||
| 8 | LHA/LHD MIDLIFE | 78,265 | 78,265 | ||||
| 9 | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 23,035 | 23,035 | ||||
| 10 | SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 64,632 | 64,632 | ||||
| 11 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 22,868 | 22,868 | ||||
| 12 | LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 3,976 | 3,976 | ||||
| 13 | SUBMARINE BATTERIES | 31,322 | 31,322 | ||||
| 14 | LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 50,475 | 50,475 | ||||
| 15 | DDG 1000 CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 42,279 | 42,279 | ||||
| 16 | STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP | 15,429 | 15,429 | ||||
| 17 | DSSP EQUIPMENT | 2,918 | 2,918 | ||||
| 18 | CG MODERNIZATION | 87,978 | 87,978 | ||||
| 19 | LCAC | 9,366 | 9,366 | ||||
| 20 | UNDERWATER EOD EQUIPMENT | 16,842 | 16,842 | ||||
| 21 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 105,715 | 105,715 | ||||
| 22 | CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS | 3,044 | 3,044 | ||||
| 23 | SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 5,885 | 5,885 | ||||
| REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 24 | SHIP MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND MODERNIZATION | 1,260,721 | 1,260,721 | ||||
| 25 | REACTOR POWER UNITS | 5,305 | 5,305 | ||||
| 26 | REACTOR COMPONENTS | 415,404 | 415,404 | ||||
| OCEAN ENGINEERING | |||||||
| 27 | DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT | 11,143 | 11,143 | ||||
| SMALL BOATS | |||||||
| 28 | STANDARD BOATS | 52,371 | 52,371 | ||||
| PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 29 | OPERATING FORCES IPE | 233,667 | 233,667 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP SUPPORT | |||||||
| 30 | LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT | 39,714 | 17,414 | ||||
| MCM containers and MPCE sonar processing insufficient justification | [–22,300] | ||||||
| 31 | LCS MCM MISSION MODULES | 218,822 | 95,322 | ||||
| Excess procurement ahead of satisfactory testing | [–123,500] | ||||||
| 32 | LCS ASW MISSION MODULES | 61,759 | 4,759 | ||||
| Excess procurement ahead of satisfactory testing | [–57,000] | ||||||
| 33 | LCS SUW MISSION MODULES | 24,412 | 24,412 | ||||
| 34 | LCS IN-SERVICE MODERNIZATION | 121,848 | 121,848 | ||||
| 35 | SMALL & MEDIUM UUV | 67,709 | 37,609 | ||||
| SMCM UUV excess procurement ahead of satisfactory testing | [–30,100] | ||||||
| SHIP SONARS | |||||||
| 37 | SPQ–9B RADAR | 27,517 | 27,517 | ||||
| 38 | AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM | 128,664 | 128,664 | ||||
| 39 | SSN ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT | 374,737 | 374,737 | ||||
| 40 | UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 9,286 | 9,286 | ||||
| ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 41 | SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM | 26,066 | 26,066 | ||||
| 42 | SSTD | 13,241 | 13,241 | ||||
| 43 | FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 193,446 | 193,446 | ||||
| 44 | SURTASS | 63,838 | 63,838 | ||||
| ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 45 | AN/SLQ–32 | 387,195 | 330,795 | ||||
| Early to need | [–56,400] | ||||||
| RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 46 | SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT | 235,744 | 235,744 | ||||
| 47 | AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) | 3,862 | 3,862 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 48 | COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY | 26,006 | 18,706 | ||||
| Common Array Block antenna program delays | [–7,300] | ||||||
| 49 | NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) | 15,385 | 15,385 | ||||
| 50 | ATDLS | 103,835 | 103,835 | ||||
| 51 | NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) | 3,594 | 3,594 | ||||
| 52 | MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT | 15,744 | 15,744 | ||||
| 53 | SHALLOW WATER MCM | 5,493 | 5,493 | ||||
| 54 | NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) | 38,043 | 38,043 | ||||
| 55 | AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE | 2,592 | 2,592 | ||||
| 56 | STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP | 7,985 | 7,985 | ||||
| AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 57 | ASHORE ATC EQUIPMENT | 83,475 | 83,475 | ||||
| 58 | AFLOAT ATC EQUIPMENT | 65,113 | 65,113 | ||||
| 59 | ID SYSTEMS | 23,815 | 23,815 | ||||
| 60 | JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEM ( | 100,751 | 100,751 | ||||
| 61 | NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 13,947 | 13,947 | ||||
| OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 62 | MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM | 1,375 | 1,375 | ||||
| 63 | TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS | 22,771 | 22,771 | ||||
| 64 | DCGS-N | 18,872 | 18,872 | ||||
| 65 | CANES | 389,585 | 389,585 | ||||
| 66 | RADIAC | 10,335 | 10,335 | ||||
| 67 | CANES-INTELL | 48,654 | 48,654 | ||||
| 68 | GPETE | 8,133 | 8,133 | ||||
| 69 | MASF | 4,150 | 4,150 | ||||
| 70 | INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY | 5,934 | 5,934 | ||||
| 71 | EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION | 4,334 | 4,334 | ||||
| 72 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 159,815 | 105,015 | ||||
| NGSSR available prior year funds | [–54,800] | ||||||
| SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 73 | SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS | 56,106 | 56,106 | ||||
| 74 | SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION | 124,288 | 124,288 | ||||
| 75 | COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M | 45,120 | 45,120 | ||||
| SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 76 | SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT | 31,133 | 31,133 | ||||
| 77 | SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT | 62,214 | 62,214 | ||||
| SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 78 | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 47,421 | 47,421 | ||||
| 79 | NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) | 64,552 | 64,552 | ||||
| SHORE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 80 | JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) | 4,398 | 4,398 | ||||
| CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 81 | INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) | 157,551 | 157,551 | ||||
| 82 | MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM | 985 | 985 | ||||
| CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 83 | CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP | 15,906 | 15,906 | ||||
| OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT | |||||||
| 90 | COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT | 70,689 | 70,689 | ||||
| SONOBUOYS | |||||||
| 92 | SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES | 237,639 | 286,739 | ||||
| Program increase for sonobuoys | [49,100] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 93 | MINOTAUR | 5,077 | 5,077 | ||||
| 94 | WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 83,969 | 83,969 | ||||
| 95 | AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 187,758 | 187,758 | ||||
| 96 | ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) | 16,059 | 16,059 | ||||
| 97 | METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT | 15,192 | 15,192 | ||||
| 99 | LEGACY AIRBORNE MCM | 6,674 | 6,674 | ||||
| 100 | LAMPS EQUIPMENT | 1,189 | 1,189 | ||||
| 101 | AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 58,873 | 58,873 | ||||
| 102 | UMCS-UNMAN CARRIER AVIATION(UCA)MISSION CNTRL | 60,937 | 60,937 | ||||
| SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 103 | SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT | 5,540 | 5,540 | ||||
| SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 104 | HARPOON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 208 | 208 | ||||
| 105 | SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 262,077 | 262,077 | ||||
| 106 | TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 84,087 | 84,087 | ||||
| FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 107 | STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP | 258,910 | 258,910 | ||||
| ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 108 | SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS | 173,770 | 173,770 | ||||
| 109 | ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 26,584 | 26,584 | ||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 110 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 7,470 | 7,470 | ||||
| 111 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 6,356 | 6,356 | ||||
| OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE | |||||||
| 112 | ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM | 86,356 | 86,356 | ||||
| 113 | SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS | 69,240 | 69,240 | ||||
| 114 | SURFACE TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 192,245 | 192,245 | ||||
| CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 115 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 6,123 | 6,123 | ||||
| 116 | GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS | 2,693 | 2,693 | ||||
| 117 | CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP | 47,301 | 47,301 | ||||
| 118 | FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 10,352 | 10,352 | ||||
| 119 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 31,475 | 31,475 | ||||
| 121 | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 2,630 | 2,630 | ||||
| 122 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 47,972 | 47,972 | ||||
| 123 | PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES | 1,171 | 1,171 | ||||
| SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 124 | SUPPLY EQUIPMENT | 19,693 | 19,693 | ||||
| 125 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 4,956 | 4,956 | ||||
| 126 | SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS | 668,639 | 668,639 | ||||
| TRAINING DEVICES | |||||||
| 127 | TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 4,026 | 4,026 | ||||
| 128 | TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT | 73,454 | 73,454 | ||||
| COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 129 | COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 32,390 | 32,390 | ||||
| 130 | MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 974 | 974 | ||||
| 132 | NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 5,606 | 5,606 | ||||
| 133 | OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 16,024 | 16,024 | ||||
| 134 | C4ISR EQUIPMENT | 6,697 | 6,697 | ||||
| 135 | ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 27,503 | 27,503 | ||||
| 136 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 138,281 | 138,281 | ||||
| 137 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 42,680 | 42,680 | ||||
| OTHER | |||||||
| 140 | NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE | 184,443 | 184,443 | ||||
| 141 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 16,523 | 16,523 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 18,446 | 18,446 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 142 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 374,195 | 374,195 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 10,948,518 | 10,576,218 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 1 | AAV7A1 PIP | 87,476 | 87,476 | ||||
| 2 | AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE FAMILY OF VEHICLES | 478,874 | 478,874 | ||||
| 3 | LAV PIP | 41,988 | 41,988 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS | |||||||
| 4 | 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER | 59 | 59 | ||||
| 5 | ARTILLERY WEAPONS SYSTEM | 174,687 | 234,287 | ||||
| Ground-Based Anti-Ship Missile NSM | [59,600] | ||||||
| 6 | WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION | 24,867 | 24,867 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 7 | MODIFICATION KITS | 3,067 | 3,067 | ||||
| GUIDED MISSILES | |||||||
| 8 | GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE | 18,920 | 18,920 | ||||
| 9 | ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-JAVELIN | 19,888 | 19,888 | ||||
| 10 | FAMILY ANTI-ARMOR WEAPON SYSTEMS (FOAAWS) | 21,891 | 21,891 | ||||
| 11 | ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-TOW | 34,985 | 34,985 | ||||
| 12 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 133,689 | 133,689 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 13 | COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C | 35,057 | 35,057 | ||||
| REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 14 | REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | 24,405 | 24,405 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) | |||||||
| 15 | MODIFICATION KITS | 1,006 | 1,006 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 16 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) | 69,725 | 69,725 | ||||
| 17 | AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS | 15,611 | 15,611 | ||||
| RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 19 | GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) | 284,283 | 284,283 | ||||
| INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 20 | GCSS-MC | 1,587 | 1,587 | ||||
| 21 | FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 24,934 | 24,934 | ||||
| 22 | INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 50,728 | 50,728 | ||||
| 24 | UNMANNED AIR SYSTEMS (INTEL) | 24,853 | 24,853 | ||||
| 25 | DCGS-MC | 38,260 | 38,260 | ||||
| 26 | UAS PAYLOADS | 5,489 | 5,489 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 29 | NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN) | 78,922 | 78,922 | ||||
| 30 | COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES | 35,349 | 35,349 | ||||
| 31 | COMMAND POST SYSTEMS | 33,713 | 33,713 | ||||
| 32 | RADIO SYSTEMS | 343,250 | 343,250 | ||||
| 33 | COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS | 40,627 | 40,627 | ||||
| 34 | COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT | 43,782 | 43,782 | ||||
| 35 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 53,896 | 53,896 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,797 | 3,797 | ||||
| ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 37 | COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES | 22,460 | 22,460 | ||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 38 | MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS | 10,739 | 10,739 | ||||
| 39 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 381,675 | 381,675 | ||||
| 40 | FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS | 2,963 | 2,963 | ||||
| ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 42 | ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT | 385 | 385 | ||||
| 43 | TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS | 501 | 501 | ||||
| 44 | POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED | 23,430 | 23,430 | ||||
| 45 | AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 5,752 | 5,752 | ||||
| 46 | EOD SYSTEMS | 20,939 | 20,939 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 47 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 23,063 | 23,063 | ||||
| GENERAL PROPERTY | |||||||
| 48 | FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | 4,187 | 4,187 | ||||
| 49 | TRAINING DEVICES | 101,765 | 101,765 | ||||
| 50 | FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | 19,305 | 19,305 | ||||
| 51 | ULTRA-LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (ULTV) | 678 | 678 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 52 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 9,174 | 9,174 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 53 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 27,295 | 27,295 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 2,903,976 | 2,963,576 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL FORCES | |||||||
| 1 | F–35 | 4,567,018 | 5,543,685 | ||||
| Additional 12 F–35As | [976,667] | ||||||
| 2 | F–35 | 610,800 | 610,800 | ||||
| 4 | F–15EX | 1,269,847 | 1,269,847 | ||||
| 5 | F–15EX | 133,500 | 133,500 | ||||
| TACTICAL AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 7 | KC–46A MDAP | 2,850,151 | 2,850,151 | ||||
| OTHER AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 8 | C–130J | 37,131 | 37,131 | ||||
| 10 | MC–130J | 362,807 | 362,807 | ||||
| 11 | MC–130J | 39,987 | 39,987 | ||||
| HELICOPTERS | |||||||
| 12 | UH–1N REPLACEMENT | 194,016 | 194,016 | ||||
| 13 | COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER | 973,473 | 973,473 | ||||
| MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 15 | CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C | 2,811 | 2,811 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 16 | TARGET DRONES | 133,273 | 133,273 | ||||
| 18 | COMPASS CALL | 161,117 | 161,117 | ||||
| 20 | MQ–9 | 29,409 | 79,409 | ||||
| Program increase | [50,000] | ||||||
| STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 22 | B–1 | 3,853 | 0 | ||||
| USAF-requested transfer to RDAF Line 174 | [–3,853] | ||||||
| 23 | B–2A | 31,476 | 31,476 | ||||
| 24 | B–1B | 21,808 | 21,315 | ||||
| USAF-requested transfer to RDAF Line 174 | [–493] | ||||||
| 25 | B–52 | 53,949 | 53,949 | ||||
| 26 | LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES | 9,999 | 9,999 | ||||
| TACTICAL AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 27 | A–10 | 135,793 | 135,793 | ||||
| 28 | E–11 BACN/HAG | 33,645 | 33,645 | ||||
| 29 | F–15 | 349,304 | 349,304 | ||||
| 30 | F–16 | 615,760 | 640,760 | ||||
| Additional radars | [25,000] | ||||||
| 32 | F–22A | 387,905 | 387,905 | ||||
| 33 | F–35 MODIFICATIONS | 322,185 | 322,185 | ||||
| 34 | F–15 EPAW | 31,995 | 31,995 | ||||
| 35 | INCREMENT 3.2B | 5,889 | 5,889 | ||||
| 36 | KC–46A MDAP | 24,085 | 24,085 | ||||
| AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 37 | C–5 | 62,108 | 62,108 | ||||
| 38 | C–17A | 66,798 | 66,798 | ||||
| 40 | C–32A | 2,947 | 2,947 | ||||
| 41 | C–37A | 12,985 | 12,985 | ||||
| TRAINER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 42 | GLIDER MODS | 977 | 977 | ||||
| 43 | T–6 | 26,829 | 26,829 | ||||
| 44 | T–1 | 4,465 | 4,465 | ||||
| 45 | T–38 | 36,806 | 44,506 | ||||
| T–38 ejection seats | [7,700] | ||||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 46 | U–2 MODS | 110,618 | 110,618 | ||||
| 47 | KC–10A (ATCA) | 117 | 117 | ||||
| 49 | VC–25A MOD | 1,983 | 1,983 | ||||
| 50 | C–40 | 9,252 | 9,252 | ||||
| 51 | C–130 | 5,871 | 5,871 | ||||
| 52 | C–130J MODS | 140,032 | 140,032 | ||||
| 53 | C–135 | 88,250 | 88,250 | ||||
| 55 | COMPASS CALL | 193,389 | 193,389 | ||||
| 57 | RC–135 | 191,332 | 191,332 | ||||
| 58 | E–3 | 172,141 | 172,141 | ||||
| 59 | E–4 | 58,803 | 44,103 | ||||
| Funds rephased to future fiscal years | [–14,700] | ||||||
| 60 | E–8 | 11,037 | 21,037 | ||||
| Secure information transmission capability | [10,000] | ||||||
| 61 | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CNTRL SYS (AWACS) 40/45 | 53,343 | 53,343 | ||||
| 62 | FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS | 1,573 | 1,573 | ||||
| 63 | H–1 | 4,410 | 4,410 | ||||
| 64 | H–60 | 44,538 | 44,538 | ||||
| 65 | RQ–4 MODS | 40,468 | 40,468 | ||||
| 66 | HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS | 20,780 | 20,780 | ||||
| 67 | OTHER AIRCRAFT | 100,774 | 100,774 | ||||
| 68 | MQ–9 MODS | 188,387 | 188,387 | ||||
| 70 | CV–22 MODS | 122,306 | 127,306 | ||||
| CV–22 ABSS | [5,000] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 71 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 926,683 | 956,683 | ||||
| F–35A initial spares increase | [30,000] | ||||||
| COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 73 | AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP | 132,719 | 132,719 | ||||
| POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT | |||||||
| 74 | B–2A | 1,683 | 1,683 | ||||
| 75 | B–2B | 46,734 | 46,734 | ||||
| 76 | B–52 | 1,034 | 1,034 | ||||
| 79 | E–11 BACN/HAG | 63,419 | 63,419 | ||||
| 80 | F–15 | 2,632 | 2,632 | ||||
| 81 | F–16 | 14,163 | 14,163 | ||||
| 83 | OTHER AIRCRAFT | 4,595 | 4,595 | ||||
| 84 | RQ–4 POST PRODUCTION CHARGES | 32,585 | 32,585 | ||||
| INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | |||||||
| 85 | INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS | 18,215 | 18,215 | ||||
| WAR CONSUMABLES | |||||||
| 86 | WAR CONSUMABLES | 36,046 | 36,046 | ||||
| OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | |||||||
| 87 | OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | 1,439,640 | 1,514,640 | ||||
| Classified increase | [75,000] | ||||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 21,692 | 21,692 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 17,908,145 | 19,068,466 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC | |||||||
| 1 | MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC | 75,012 | 75,012 | ||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 2 | REPLAC EQUIP & WAR CONSUMABLES | 4,495 | 4,495 | ||||
| 4 | JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE | 475,949 | 400,949 | ||||
| Realignment to support NDS requirements in Pacific | [–75,000] | ||||||
| 5 | LRASM0 | 19,800 | 94,800 | ||||
| Additional Air Force LRASM missiles | [75,000] | ||||||
| 6 | SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) | 164,769 | 164,769 | ||||
| 7 | AMRAAM | 453,223 | 453,223 | ||||
| 8 | PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE | 40,129 | 40,129 | ||||
| 9 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 45,475 | 45,475 | ||||
| 10 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II | 273,272 | 273,272 | ||||
| INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | |||||||
| 11 | INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION | 814 | 814 | ||||
| CLASS IV | |||||||
| 13 | ICBM FUZE MOD | 3,458 | 3,458 | ||||
| 14 | ICBM FUZE MOD AP | 43,450 | 43,450 | ||||
| 15 | MM III MODIFICATIONS | 85,310 | 85,310 | ||||
| 16 | AGM–65D MAVERICK | 298 | 298 | ||||
| 17 | AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) | 52,924 | 52,924 | ||||
| MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 18 | MSL SPRS/REPAIR PARTS (INITIAL) | 9,402 | 9,402 | ||||
| 19 | MSL SPRS/REPAIR PARTS (REPLEN) | 84,671 | 84,671 | ||||
| SPECIAL PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 25 | SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS | 23,501 | 23,501 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 540,465 | 540,465 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 2,396,417 | 2,396,417 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, SPACE FORCE | |||||||
| SPACE PROCUREMENT, SF | |||||||
| 1 | ADVANCED EHF | 14,823 | 14,823 | ||||
| 2 | AF SATELLITE COMM SYSTEM | 48,326 | 48,326 | ||||
| 3 | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS | 65,540 | 65,540 | ||||
| 4 | FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS | 66,190 | 66,190 | ||||
| 5 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECH—SPACE | 3,299 | 3,299 | ||||
| 6 | GPSIII FOLLOW ON | 627,796 | 627,796 | ||||
| 7 | GPS III SPACE SEGMENT | 20,122 | 20,122 | ||||
| 8 | GLOBAL POSTIONING (SPACE) | 2,256 | 2,256 | ||||
| 9 | SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) | 35,495 | 35,495 | ||||
| 10 | MILSATCOM | 15,795 | 15,795 | ||||
| 11 | SBIR HIGH (SPACE) | 160,891 | 160,891 | ||||
| 12 | SPECIAL SPACE ACTIVITIES | 78,387 | 78,387 | ||||
| 13 | NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH | 1,043,171 | 1,043,171 | ||||
| 14 | NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM | 6,638 | 6,638 | ||||
| 15 | ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM | 47,741 | 47,741 | ||||
| 16 | SPACE FENCE | 11,279 | 11,279 | ||||
| 17 | SPACE MODS | 96,551 | 109,051 | ||||
| Cobra Dane service life extension | [12,500] | ||||||
| 18 | SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE | 100,492 | 100,492 | ||||
| SPARES | |||||||
| 19 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 1,272 | 1,272 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, SPACE FORCE | 2,446,064 | 2,458,564 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 1 | ROCKETS | 14,962 | 14,962 | ||||
| CARTRIDGES | |||||||
| 2 | CARTRIDGES | 123,365 | 123,365 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 3 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 59,725 | 59,725 | ||||
| 6 | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 206,989 | 206,989 | ||||
| 7 | B61 | 35,634 | 35,634 | ||||
| OTHER ITEMS | |||||||
| 9 | CAD/PAD | 47,830 | 47,830 | ||||
| 10 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) | 6,232 | 6,232 | ||||
| 11 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 542 | 542 | ||||
| 12 | MODIFICATIONS | 1,310 | 1,310 | ||||
| 13 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 | 4,753 | 4,753 | ||||
| FLARES | |||||||
| 15 | FLARES | 40,088 | 40,088 | ||||
| FUZES | |||||||
| 16 | FUZES | 40,983 | 40,983 | ||||
| SMALL ARMS | |||||||
| 17 | SMALL ARMS | 13,925 | 13,925 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 596,338 | 596,338 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | |||||||
| 1 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 9,016 | 9,016 | ||||
| CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | |||||||
| 2 | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE | 15,058 | 15,058 | ||||
| 3 | CAP VEHICLES | 1,059 | 1,059 | ||||
| 4 | CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | 38,920 | 38,920 | ||||
| SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 5 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 30,544 | 30,544 | ||||
| 6 | SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES | 319 | 319 | ||||
| 7 | SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | 43,157 | 43,157 | ||||
| FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 8 | FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES | 8,621 | 8,621 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 9 | MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES | 12,897 | 12,897 | ||||
| BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 10 | RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU | 3,577 | 3,577 | ||||
| 11 | BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES | 43,095 | 43,095 | ||||
| COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) | |||||||
| 13 | COMSEC EQUIPMENT | 54,864 | 54,864 | ||||
| INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 14 | INTERNATIONAL INTEL TECH & ARCHITECTURES | 9,283 | 10,783 | ||||
| PDI: Mission Partner Environment BICES-X local upgrades | [1,500] | ||||||
| 15 | INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 6,849 | 6,849 | ||||
| 16 | INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT | 33,471 | 33,471 | ||||
| ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 17 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS | 29,409 | 29,409 | ||||
| 18 | BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED | 7,909 | 7,909 | ||||
| 19 | THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMEN | 32,632 | 32,632 | ||||
| 20 | WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST | 33,021 | 33,021 | ||||
| 21 | STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL | 31,353 | 31,353 | ||||
| 22 | CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX | 10,314 | 10,314 | ||||
| 23 | MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 15,132 | 15,132 | ||||
| 25 | INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN) | 9,806 | 9,806 | ||||
| SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS | |||||||
| 26 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 39,887 | 39,887 | ||||
| 27 | AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS | 2,602 | 2,602 | ||||
| 29 | MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL | 10,541 | 10,541 | ||||
| 30 | AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM | 96,277 | 96,277 | ||||
| 31 | COMBAT TRAINING RANGES | 195,185 | 195,185 | ||||
| 32 | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N | 29,664 | 29,664 | ||||
| 33 | WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE (WAS) | 59,633 | 59,633 | ||||
| 34 | C3 COUNTERMEASURES | 105,584 | 105,584 | ||||
| 36 | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING & MGT SYS | 899 | 899 | ||||
| 38 | THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM | 3,392 | 3,392 | ||||
| 39 | AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) | 24,983 | 24,983 | ||||
| AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 41 | BASE INFORMATION TRANSPT INFRAST (BITI) WIRED | 19,147 | 19,147 | ||||
| 42 | AFNET | 84,515 | 84,515 | ||||
| 43 | JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) | 6,185 | 6,185 | ||||
| 44 | USCENTCOM | 19,649 | 19,649 | ||||
| 45 | USSTRATCOM | 4,337 | 4,337 | ||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BASE | |||||||
| 46 | TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT | 137,033 | 137,033 | ||||
| 47 | RADIO EQUIPMENT | 15,264 | 15,264 | ||||
| 49 | BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE | 132,281 | 146,281 | ||||
| PDI: Mission Partner Environment PACNET | [14,000] | ||||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 50 | COMM ELECT MODS | 21,471 | 21,471 | ||||
| PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP | |||||||
| 51 | PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT | 49,578 | 49,578 | ||||
| DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ | |||||||
| 52 | POWER CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT | 11,454 | 11,454 | ||||
| 53 | MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP | 12,110 | 12,110 | ||||
| BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 54 | BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT | 21,142 | 21,142 | ||||
| 55 | ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT | 7,700 | 7,700 | ||||
| 56 | MOBILITY EQUIPMENT | 18,266 | 22,966 | ||||
| Insulation system for Air Force shelters | [4,700] | ||||||
| 57 | FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) | 9,601 | 9,601 | ||||
| 58 | BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 42,078 | 42,078 | ||||
| SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS | |||||||
| 60 | DARP RC135 | 27,164 | 27,164 | ||||
| 61 | DCGS-AF | 121,528 | 121,528 | ||||
| 63 | SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM | 782,641 | 782,641 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 21,086,112 | 21,086,112 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 64 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS (CYBER) | 1,664 | 1,664 | ||||
| 65 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 15,847 | 15,847 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 23,695,720 | 23,715,920 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA | |||||||
| 2 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 1,398 | 1,398 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCSA | |||||||
| 3 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 2,212 | 2,212 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA | |||||||
| 5 | PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION | 4,213 | 4,213 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 11 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY | 17,211 | 17,211 | ||||
| 12 | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 29,841 | 29,841 | ||||
| 13 | JOINT FORCES HEADQUARTERS—DODIN | 3,091 | 3,091 | ||||
| 14 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 41,569 | 41,569 | ||||
| 16 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK | 26,978 | 26,978 | ||||
| 17 | WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY | 44,161 | 44,161 | ||||
| 18 | SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE | 35,935 | 35,935 | ||||
| 19 | JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) | 88,741 | 77,641 | ||||
| JRSS SIPR funding | [–11,100] | ||||||
| 20 | JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER | 157,538 | 157,538 | ||||
| 21 | FOURTH ESTATE NETWORK OPTIMIZATION (4ENO) | 42,084 | 42,084 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA | |||||||
| 23 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 417,459 | 417,459 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT | |||||||
| 24 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 7,993 | 7,993 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA | |||||||
| 25 | AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS | 1,319 | 1,319 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA | |||||||
| 26 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA | 500 | 500 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | |||||||
| 27 | REGIONAL CENTER PROCUREMENT | 1,598 | 1,598 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | |||||||
| 28 | VEHICLES | 215 | 215 | ||||
| 29 | OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 9,994 | 9,994 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | |||||||
| 31 | THAAD | 495,396 | 601,796 | ||||
| 8th THAAD battery components | [76,300] | ||||||
| HEMTT life-of-type buy | [30,100] | ||||||
| 34 | AEGIS BMD | 356,195 | 356,195 | ||||
| 35 | AEGIS BMD AP | 44,901 | 44,901 | ||||
| 36 | BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS | 0 | 243,300 | ||||
| 8th THAAD battery radar equipment | [243,300] | ||||||
| 37 | SM–3 IIAS | 218,322 | 346,322 | ||||
| Additional SM–3 Block IIA interceptors | [128,000] | ||||||
| 38 | ARROW 3 UPPER TIER SYSTEMS | 77,000 | 77,000 | ||||
| 39 | SHORT RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (SRBMD) | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| 40 | AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III | 39,114 | 39,114 | ||||
| 41 | IRON DOME | 73,000 | 73,000 | ||||
| 42 | AEGIS BMD HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | 104,241 | 104,241 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA | |||||||
| 48 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) | 101 | 101 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD | |||||||
| 49 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD | 3,099 | 3,099 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS | |||||||
| 50 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS | 8,329 | 8,329 | ||||
| 51 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT—TJS CYBER | 1,247 | 1,247 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | |||||||
| 53 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | 515 | 515 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 554,264 | 554,264 | ||||
| AVIATION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 55 | ARMED OVERWATCH/TARGETING | 101,000 | 0 | ||||
| Lack of validated requirement and analysis | [–101,000] | ||||||
| 56 | MANNED ISR | 0 | 40,100 | ||||
| SOCOM DHC–8 combat loss replacement | [40,100] | ||||||
| 59 | ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT | 211,041 | 211,041 | ||||
| 60 | UNMANNED ISR | 25,488 | 25,488 | ||||
| 61 | NON-STANDARD AVIATION | 61,874 | 61,874 | ||||
| 62 | U–28 | 3,825 | 28,525 | ||||
| SOCOM aircraft maintenance support combat loss replacement | [24,700] | ||||||
| 63 | MH–47 CHINOOK | 135,482 | 135,482 | ||||
| 64 | CV–22 MODIFICATION | 14,829 | 14,829 | ||||
| 65 | MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE | 6,746 | 6,746 | ||||
| 66 | PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE | 243,111 | 243,111 | ||||
| 67 | AC/MC–130J | 163,914 | 163,914 | ||||
| 68 | C–130 MODIFICATIONS | 20,414 | 20,414 | ||||
| SHIPBUILDING | |||||||
| 69 | UNDERWATER SYSTEMS | 20,556 | 20,556 | ||||
| AMMUNITION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 70 | ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M | 186,197 | 186,197 | ||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 71 | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | 94,982 | 108,382 | ||||
| Transfer from MMP-Light to man-pack | [13,400] | ||||||
| 72 | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 11,645 | 11,645 | ||||
| 73 | OTHER ITEMS <$5M | 96,333 | 96,333 | ||||
| 74 | COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS | 17,278 | 17,278 | ||||
| 75 | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 78,865 | 78,865 | ||||
| 76 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 30,158 | 30,158 | ||||
| 77 | WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M | 260,733 | 248,533 | ||||
| MMP-Light unexecutable, transfer to man-pack | [–12,200] | ||||||
| 78 | COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS | 19,848 | 19,848 | ||||
| 79 | GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES | 2,401 | 2,401 | ||||
| 80 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 13,861 | 13,861 | ||||
| 81 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 247,038 | 259,538 | ||||
| SOCOM Syria exfiltration reconsitution | [12,500] | ||||||
| CBDP | |||||||
| 82 | CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS | 147,150 | 147,150 | ||||
| 83 | CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION | 149,944 | 149,944 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 5,324,487 | 5,768,587 | |||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 130,684,160 | 134,014,838 | |||||
| SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| ROTARY | |||||||
| 9 | AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIB NEW BUILD | 69,154 | 69,154 | ||||
| 14 | CH–47 HELICOPTER | 50,472 | 50,472 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 17 | MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP) | 5,968 | 5,968 | ||||
| 20 | MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) | 122,520 | 122,520 | ||||
| 25 | EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 26,460 | 26,460 | ||||
| 30 | DEGRADED VISUAL ENVIRONMENT | 1,916 | 1,916 | ||||
| GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS | |||||||
| 37 | CMWS | 149,162 | 149,162 | ||||
| 38 | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 32,400 | 32,400 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 41 | AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS | 3,028 | 3,028 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 461,080 | 461,080 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 2 | M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT | 158,300 | 158,300 | ||||
| 3 | MSE MISSILE | 176,585 | 0 | ||||
| Inappropriate for EDI, transfer to base | [–176,585] | ||||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 6 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 236,265 | 236,265 | ||||
| ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS | |||||||
| 11 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 127,015 | 127,015 | ||||
| 15 | LETHAL MINIATURE AERIAL MISSILE SYSTEM (LMAMS | 84,993 | 84,993 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 17 | ATACMS MODS | 78,434 | 78,434 | ||||
| 22 | MLRS MODS | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 881,592 | 705,007 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | |||||||
| WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 16 | MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON S | 4,765 | 4,765 | ||||
| 18 | MORTAR SYSTEMS | 10,460 | 10,460 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | 15,225 | 15,225 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 1 | CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES | 567 | 567 | ||||
| 2 | CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES | 40 | 40 | ||||
| 4 | CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES | 17 | 17 | ||||
| 5 | CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES | 189 | 189 | ||||
| 8 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 24,900 | 24,900 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 16 | PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 | 29,213 | 29,213 | ||||
| 17 | ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL | 21,675 | 21,675 | ||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 20 | SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 176 | 176 | ||||
| 21 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 33,880 | 33,880 | ||||
| MISCELLANEOUS | |||||||
| 29 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) | 11 | 11 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 110,668 | 110,668 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 13 | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) | 6,500 | 6,500 | ||||
| 14 | PLS ESP | 15,163 | 15,163 | ||||
| 17 | TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS | 27,066 | 27,066 | ||||
| COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 30 | TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS | 2,700 | 2,700 | ||||
| 32 | ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING | 12,566 | 12,566 | ||||
| 33 | SMART-T (SPACE) | 289 | 289 | ||||
| 34 | GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS | 319 | 319 | ||||
| COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 45 | FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE | 1,257 | 1,257 | ||||
| COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM | |||||||
| 48 | CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) | 1,230 | 1,230 | ||||
| INFORMATION SECURITY | |||||||
| 52 | COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) | 128 | 128 | ||||
| COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 58 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 15,277 | 15,277 | ||||
| 62 | INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM | 74,004 | 80,004 | ||||
| EDI: NATO Response Force (NRF) networks | [6,000] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) | |||||||
| 68 | DCGS-A (MIP) | 47,709 | 47,709 | ||||
| 70 | TROJAN (MIP) | 1,766 | 1,766 | ||||
| 71 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) | 61,450 | 61,450 | ||||
| 73 | BIOMETRIC TACTICAL COLLECTION DEVICES (MIP) | 12,337 | 12,337 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) | |||||||
| 80 | FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAP. (MIP) | 44,293 | 44,293 | ||||
| 81 | COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES | 49,100 | 49,100 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) | |||||||
| 83 | SENTINEL MODS | 33,496 | 33,496 | ||||
| 84 | NIGHT VISION DEVICES | 643 | 643 | ||||
| 87 | RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS | 11 | 11 | ||||
| 88 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS | 37,000 | 37,000 | ||||
| 94 | COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 | 280 | 280 | ||||
| 95 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM | 13,672 | 13,672 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 100 | AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS | 15,143 | 15,143 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION | |||||||
| 109 | ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION | 4,688 | 4,688 | ||||
| 110 | AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP | 16,552 | 16,552 | ||||
| CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 121 | FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) | 25,480 | 25,480 | ||||
| 122 | BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) | 98,960 | 98,960 | ||||
| 123 | CBRN DEFENSE | 18,887 | 18,887 | ||||
| BRIDGING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 125 | TACTICAL BRIDGING | 50,400 | 50,400 | ||||
| ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 137 | RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS | 84,000 | 84,000 | ||||
| COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 140 | HEATERS AND ECU'S | 370 | 370 | ||||
| 142 | PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) | 3,721 | 3,721 | ||||
| 145 | FORCE PROVIDER | 56,400 | 129,800 | ||||
| EDI: Improvements to living quarters for rotational forces in Europe | [73,400] | ||||||
| 146 | FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT | 2,279 | 2,279 | ||||
| 147 | CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM | 2,040 | 2,040 | ||||
| PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 150 | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER | 4,374 | 4,374 | ||||
| MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 151 | COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL | 6,390 | 6,390 | ||||
| MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 152 | MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS | 7,769 | 7,769 | ||||
| 153 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) | 184 | 184 | ||||
| CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 156 | LOADERS | 3,190 | 3,190 | ||||
| 157 | HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR | 7,600 | 7,600 | ||||
| 158 | TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED | 7,450 | 7,450 | ||||
| 160 | HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) | 3,703 | 3,703 | ||||
| 162 | CONST EQUIP ESP | 657 | 657 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 167 | GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP | 106 | 106 | ||||
| MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 169 | FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS | 1,885 | 1,885 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 180 | RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 8,500 | 8,500 | ||||
| 181 | PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) | 3,248 | 3,248 | ||||
| 185 | BUILDING, PRE-FAB, RELOCATABLE | 31,845 | 31,845 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 924,077 | 1,003,477 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 24 | STUASL0 UAV | 7,921 | 7,921 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 53 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 3,474 | 3,474 | ||||
| 55 | COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM | 3,339 | 3,339 | ||||
| 64 | QRC | 18,507 | 18,507 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 33,241 | 33,241 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 12 | HELLFIRE | 5,572 | 5,572 | ||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 5,572 | 5,572 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 1 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 8,068 | 8,068 | ||||
| 2 | JDAM | 15,529 | 15,529 | ||||
| 3 | AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 23,000 | 23,000 | ||||
| 4 | MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION | 22,600 | 22,600 | ||||
| 6 | CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES | 3,927 | 3,927 | ||||
| 7 | AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES | 15,978 | 15,978 | ||||
| 8 | JATOS | 2,100 | 2,100 | ||||
| 11 | OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION | 2,611 | 2,611 | ||||
| 12 | SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO | 1,624 | 1,624 | ||||
| 13 | PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION | 505 | 505 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 95,942 | 95,942 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| SMALL BOATS | |||||||
| 28 | STANDARD BOATS | 19,104 | 19,104 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP SUPPORT | |||||||
| 35 | SMALL & MEDIUM UUV | 2,946 | 2,946 | ||||
| ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 43 | FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 213,000 | 213,000 | ||||
| SONOBUOYS | |||||||
| 92 | SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES | 26,196 | 26,196 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 95 | AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 60,217 | 60,217 | ||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 110 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 2,124 | 2,124 | ||||
| CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 115 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 177 | 177 | ||||
| 116 | GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS | 416 | 416 | ||||
| 118 | FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 801 | 801 | ||||
| SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 125 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 520 | 520 | ||||
| TRAINING DEVICES | |||||||
| 128 | TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT | 11,500 | 11,500 | ||||
| COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 130 | MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 3,525 | 3,525 | ||||
| 136 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 343,526 | 343,526 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| GUIDED MISSILES | |||||||
| 12 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 17,456 | 17,456 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) | |||||||
| 15 | MODIFICATION KITS | 4,200 | 4,200 | ||||
| INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 22 | INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 10,124 | 10,124 | ||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 38 | MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS | 16,183 | 16,183 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 47,963 | 47,963 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| HELICOPTERS | |||||||
| 13 | COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER | 174,000 | 174,000 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 20 | MQ–9 | 142,490 | 142,490 | ||||
| 21 | RQ–20B PUMA | 13,770 | 13,770 | ||||
| STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 26 | LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES | 57,521 | 57,521 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 46 | U–2 MODS | 9,600 | 9,600 | ||||
| 55 | COMPASS CALL | 12,800 | 12,800 | ||||
| 66 | HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS | 58,020 | 58,020 | ||||
| 69 | MQ–9 UAS PAYLOADS | 46,100 | 46,100 | ||||
| 70 | CV–22 MODS | 6,290 | 6,290 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 71 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 10,700 | 10,700 | ||||
| 72 | MQ–9 | 12,250 | 12,250 | ||||
| COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 73 | AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP | 25,614 | 25,614 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 569,155 | 569,155 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 4 | JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE | 30,000 | 30,000 | ||||
| 8 | PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE | 143,420 | 143,420 | ||||
| 9 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 50,352 | 50,352 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 223,772 | 223,772 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 1 | ROCKETS | 19,489 | 19,489 | ||||
| CARTRIDGES | |||||||
| 2 | CARTRIDGES | 40,434 | 40,434 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 4 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 369,566 | 369,566 | ||||
| 6 | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 237,723 | 237,723 | ||||
| FLARES | |||||||
| 15 | FLARES | 21,171 | 21,171 | ||||
| FUZES | |||||||
| 16 | FUZES | 107,855 | 107,855 | ||||
| SMALL ARMS | |||||||
| 17 | SMALL ARMS | 6,217 | 6,217 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 802,455 | 802,455 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | |||||||
| 1 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 1,302 | 1,302 | ||||
| CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | |||||||
| 2 | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE | 3,400 | 3,400 | ||||
| 4 | CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | 12,475 | 12,475 | ||||
| SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 5 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 26,150 | 26,150 | ||||
| 7 | SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | 51,254 | 51,254 | ||||
| FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 8 | FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES | 24,903 | 24,903 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 9 | MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES | 14,167 | 14,167 | ||||
| BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 10 | RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU | 5,759 | 5,759 | ||||
| 11 | BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES | 20,653 | 20,653 | ||||
| SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS | |||||||
| 26 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 5,100 | 5,100 | ||||
| 30 | AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM | 56,496 | 56,496 | ||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BASE | |||||||
| 49 | BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE | 30,717 | 30,717 | ||||
| BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 55 | ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT | 13,172 | 13,172 | ||||
| 56 | MOBILITY EQUIPMENT | 33,694 | 33,694 | ||||
| 57 | FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) | 1,777 | 1,777 | ||||
| 58 | BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 31,620 | 31,620 | ||||
| SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS | |||||||
| 61 | DCGS-AF | 18,700 | 18,700 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 65 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 4,000 | 4,000 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 355,339 | 355,339 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 16 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK | 6,120 | 6,120 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | |||||||
| 30 | COUNTER IMPROVISED THREAT TECHNOLOGIES | 2,540 | 2,540 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,500 | 3,500 | |||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| AVIATION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 56 | MANNED ISR | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 57 | MC–12 | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 60 | UNMANNED ISR | 8,207 | 8,207 | ||||
| AMMUNITION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 70 | ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M | 105,355 | 105,355 | ||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 71 | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | 16,234 | 16,234 | ||||
| 73 | OTHER ITEMS <$5M | 984 | 984 | ||||
| 76 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 2,990 | 2,990 | ||||
| 77 | WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M | 32,573 | 32,573 | ||||
| 78 | COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||
| 80 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 6,724 | 6,724 | ||||
| 81 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 53,264 | 53,264 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 258,491 | 258,491 | |||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 5,128,098 | 5,030,913 | |||||
| SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 2 | 0601102A | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 303,257 | 315,257 | |
| AI human performance optimization | [2,000] | ||||
| Increase in basic research | [10,000] | ||||
| 3 | 0601103A | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 67,148 | 67,148 | |
| 4 | 0601104A | UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS | 87,877 | 87,877 | |
| 5 | 0601121A | CYBER COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ALLIANCE | 5,077 | 5,077 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 463,359 | 475,359 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 7 | 0602115A | BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 11,835 | 15,835 | |
| Pandemic vaccine response | [4,000] | ||||
| 11 | 0602134A | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT ADVANCED STUDIES | 2,000 | 2,000 | |
| 12 | 0602141A | LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY | 42,425 | 45,425 | |
| Hybrid additive manufacturing | [3,000] | ||||
| 13 | 0602142A | ARMY APPLIED RESEARCH | 30,757 | 33,757 | |
| Pathfinder Air Assault | [3,000] | ||||
| 14 | 0602143A | SOLDIER LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY | 125,435 | 135,935 | |
| Harnessing Emerging Research Opportunities to Empower Soldiers Program | [2,500] | ||||
| Metal-based display technologies | [3,000] | ||||
| Pathfinder Airborne | [5,000] | ||||
| 15 | 0602144A | GROUND TECHNOLOGY | 28,047 | 30,047 | |
| Ground technology advanced manufacturing, materials and process initiative | [2,000] | ||||
| 16 | 0602145A | NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY | 217,565 | 227,565 | |
| Ground combat vehicle platform electrification | [2,000] | ||||
| Immersive virtual modeling and simulation techniques | [5,000] | ||||
| Next Generation Combat Vehicle modeling and simulation | [3,000] | ||||
| 17 | 0602146A | NETWORK C3I TECHNOLOGY | 114,404 | 126,404 | |
| Backpackable Communications Intelligence System | [5,000] | ||||
| Defense resiliency platform against extreme cold weather | [3,000] | ||||
| Multi-drone multi-sensor ISR capability | [2,000] | ||||
| Quantum computing base materials optimization | [2,000] | ||||
| 18 | 0602147A | LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES TECHNOLOGY | 60,553 | 67,553 | |
| Composite artillery tube and propulsion prototyping | [7,000] | ||||
| 19 | 0602148A | FUTURE VERTICLE LIFT TECHNOLOGY | 96,484 | 96,484 | |
| 20 | 0602150A | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY | 56,298 | 66,298 | |
| Counter unmanned aerial systems threat R&D | [5,000] | ||||
| Counter unmanned aircraft systems research | [5,000] | ||||
| 22 | 0602213A | C3I APPLIED CYBER | 18,816 | 18,816 | |
| 40 | 0602785A | MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY | 20,766 | 20,766 | |
| 42 | 0602787A | MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 95,496 | 97,496 | |
| Research for coronavirus vaccine | [2,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 920,881 | 984,381 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 44 | 0603002A | MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 38,896 | 38,896 | |
| 49 | 0603007A | MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 11,659 | 11,659 | |
| 52 | 0603115A | MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT | 27,723 | 27,723 | |
| 53 | 0603117A | ARMY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 62,663 | 62,663 | |
| 54 | 0603118A | SOLDIER LETHALITY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 109,608 | 111,608 | |
| 3D advanced manufacturing | [2,000] | ||||
| 55 | 0603119A | GROUND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 14,795 | 20,795 | |
| Cybersecurity for industrial control systems and building automation | [3,000] | ||||
| Graphene applications for military engineering | [3,000] | ||||
| 59 | 0603134A | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT SIMULATION | 25,000 | 25,000 | |
| 63 | 0603457A | C3I CYBER ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 23,357 | 23,357 | |
| 64 | 0603461A | HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 188,024 | 193,024 | |
| High performance computing modernization | [5,000] | ||||
| 65 | 0603462A | NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 199,358 | 226,858 | |
| Carbon fiber and graphitic composites | [10,000] | ||||
| Cyber and connected vehicle innovation research | [5,000] | ||||
| Small unit ground robotic capabilities | [7,500] | ||||
| Virtual experimentations enhancement | [5,000] | ||||
| 66 | 0603463A | NETWORK C3I ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 158,608 | 158,608 | |
| 67 | 0603464A | LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 121,060 | 124,060 | |
| Hyper velocity projectile—extended range technologies | [3,000] | ||||
| 68 | 0603465A | FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 156,194 | 156,194 | |
| 69 | 0603466A | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 58,130 | 73,630 | |
| Electromagnetic effects research to support fires and AMD CFTs | [5,000] | ||||
| High-energy laser system characterization lab | [10,500] | ||||
| 77 | 0603920A | HUMANITARIAN DEMINING | 8,515 | 8,515 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 1,203,590 | 1,262,590 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 78 | 0603305A | ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 11,062 | 14,062 | |
| Hypersonic hot air tunnel test environment | [3,000] | ||||
| 79 | 0603308A | ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 26,230 | 26,230 | |
| 80 | 0603327A | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 26,482 | 26,482 | |
| 81 | 0603619A | LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV | 64,092 | 64,092 | |
| 83 | 0603639A | TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION | 92,753 | 92,753 | |
| 84 | 0603645A | ARMORED SYSTEM MODERNIZATION—ADV DEV | 151,478 | 151,478 | |
| 85 | 0603747A | SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY | 5,841 | 5,841 | |
| 86 | 0603766A | TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV | 194,775 | 194,775 | |
| 87 | 0603774A | NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 24,316 | 24,316 | |
| 88 | 0603779A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL | 13,387 | 13,387 | |
| 89 | 0603790A | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 4,762 | 4,762 | |
| 90 | 0603801A | AVIATION—ADV DEV | 647,937 | 652,937 | |
| Future Long Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA) | [5,000] | ||||
| 91 | 0603804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV | 4,761 | 4,761 | |
| 92 | 0603807A | MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV | 28,520 | 28,520 | |
| 93 | 0603827A | SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 26,138 | 26,138 | |
| 94 | 0604017A | ROBOTICS DEVELOPMENT | 121,207 | 121,207 | |
| 96 | 0604021A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY MATURATION (MIP) | 22,840 | 22,840 | |
| 97 | 0604035A | LOW EARTH ORBIT (LEO) SATELLITE CAPABILITY | 22,678 | 22,678 | |
| 98 | 0604100A | ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES | 10,082 | 10,082 | |
| 99 | 0604101A | SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (SUAV) (6.4) | 1,378 | 1,378 | |
| 100 | 0604113A | FUTURE TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (FTUAS) | 40,083 | 40,083 | |
| 101 | 0604114A | LOWER TIER AIR MISSILE DEFENSE (LTAMD) SENSOR | 376,373 | 376,373 | |
| 102 | 0604115A | TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES | 156,834 | 146,834 | |
| OpFires lack of transition pathway | [–10,000] | ||||
| 103 | 0604117A | MANEUVER—SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE (M-SHORAD) | 4,995 | 4,995 | |
| 105 | 0604119A | ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING | 170,490 | 170,490 | |
| 106 | 0604120A | ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) | 128,125 | 128,125 | |
| 107 | 0604121A | SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT REFINEMENT & PROTOTYPING | 129,547 | 129,547 | |
| 108 | 0604134A | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT DEMONSTRATION, PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING | 13,831 | 13,831 | |
| 109 | 0604182A | HYPERSONICS | 801,417 | 796,417 | |
| Lack of hypersonic prototyping coordination | [–5,000] | ||||
| 111 | 0604403A | FUTURE INTERCEPTOR | 7,992 | 7,992 | |
| 112 | 0604541A | UNIFIED NETWORK TRANSPORT | 40,677 | 40,677 | |
| 115 | 0305251A | CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT | 50,525 | 50,525 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 3,421,608 | 3,414,608 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 118 | 0604201A | AIRCRAFT AVIONICS | 2,764 | 2,764 | |
| 119 | 0604270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 62,426 | 62,426 | |
| 121 | 0604601A | INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS | 91,574 | 91,574 | |
| 122 | 0604604A | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES | 8,523 | 8,523 | |
| 123 | 0604611A | JAVELIN | 7,493 | 7,493 | |
| 124 | 0604622A | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES | 24,792 | 24,792 | |
| 125 | 0604633A | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 3,511 | 3,511 | |
| 126 | 0604642A | LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES | 1,976 | 1,976 | |
| 127 | 0604645A | ARMORED SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION (ASM)—ENG DEV | 135,488 | 135,488 | |
| 128 | 0604710A | NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 61,445 | 61,445 | |
| 129 | 0604713A | COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT | 2,814 | 2,814 | |
| 130 | 0604715A | NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV | 28,036 | 28,036 | |
| 131 | 0604741A | AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV | 43,651 | 83,651 | |
| Joint Counter-UAS Office acceleration | [17,500] | ||||
| Joint Counter-UAS Office SOCOM advanced capabilities | [7,500] | ||||
| Joint Counter-UAS Office SOCOM demonstrations | [15,000] | ||||
| 132 | 0604742A | CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 10,150 | 10,150 | |
| 133 | 0604746A | AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT | 5,578 | 5,578 | |
| 134 | 0604760A | DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV | 7,892 | 7,892 | |
| 135 | 0604768A | BRILLIANT ANTI-ARMOR SUBMUNITION (BAT) | 24,975 | 24,975 | |
| 136 | 0604780A | COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE | 3,568 | 3,568 | |
| 137 | 0604798A | BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION | 19,268 | 19,268 | |
| 138 | 0604802A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV | 265,811 | 266,611 | |
| Increase NGSW soldier touchpoints | [800] | ||||
| 139 | 0604804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV | 49,694 | 49,694 | |
| 140 | 0604805A | COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 11,079 | 11,079 | |
| 141 | 0604807A | MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV | 49,870 | 49,870 | |
| 142 | 0604808A | LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV | 9,589 | 9,589 | |
| 143 | 0604818A | ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE | 162,513 | 162,513 | |
| 144 | 0604820A | RADAR DEVELOPMENT | 109,259 | 109,259 | |
| 145 | 0604822A | GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) | 21,201 | 21,201 | |
| 146 | 0604823A | FIREFINDER | 20,008 | 20,008 | |
| 147 | 0604827A | SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL | 6,534 | 6,534 | |
| 148 | 0604852A | SUITE OF SURVIVABILITY ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS—EMD | 82,459 | 129,459 | |
| Bradley and Stryker APS | [47,000] | ||||
| 149 | 0604854A | ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD | 11,611 | 11,611 | |
| 150 | 0605013A | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 142,678 | 147,678 | |
| Integrated data software pilot program | [5,000] | ||||
| 151 | 0605018A | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) | 115,286 | 115,286 | |
| 152 | 0605028A | ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) | 96,594 | 96,594 | |
| 154 | 0605030A | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) | 16,264 | 16,264 | |
| 155 | 0605031A | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN) | 31,696 | 31,696 | |
| 157 | 0605033A | GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—EXPEDITIONARY (GBOSS-E) | 5,976 | 5,976 | |
| 159 | 0605035A | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 23,321 | 23,321 | |
| 161 | 0605038A | NUCLEAR BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE (NBCRV) SENSOR SUITE | 4,846 | 4,846 | |
| 162 | 0605041A | DEFENSIVE CYBER TOOL DEVELOPMENT | 28,544 | 16,544 | |
| Army Cyber SU program | [–12,000] | ||||
| 163 | 0605042A | TACTICAL NETWORK RADIO SYSTEMS (LOW-TIER) | 28,178 | 28,178 | |
| 164 | 0605047A | CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM | 22,860 | 22,860 | |
| 166 | 0605051A | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 35,893 | 35,893 | |
| 167 | 0605052A | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2—BLOCK 1 | 235,770 | 187,970 | |
| Army-identified funding early to need | [–47,800] | ||||
| 168 | 0605053A | GROUND ROBOTICS | 13,710 | 13,710 | |
| 169 | 0605054A | EMERGING TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES | 294,739 | 294,739 | |
| 170 | 0605145A | MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 954 | 954 | |
| 171 | 0605203A | ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 150,201 | 150,201 | |
| 172 | 0605205A | SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (SUAV) (6.5) | 5,999 | 5,999 | |
| 174 | 0605450A | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 8,891 | 8,891 | |
| 175 | 0605457A | ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) | 193,929 | 193,929 | |
| 176 | 0605625A | MANNED GROUND VEHICLE | 327,732 | 247,732 | |
| OMFV program reset | [–80,000] | ||||
| 177 | 0605766A | NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) | 7,670 | 7,670 | |
| 178 | 0605812A | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH | 1,742 | 1,742 | |
| 179 | 0605830A | AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,467 | 1,467 | |
| 180 | 0303032A | TROJAN—RH12 | 3,451 | 3,451 | |
| 183 | 0304270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 55,855 | 55,855 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 3,199,798 | 3,152,798 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 185 | 0604256A | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 14,515 | 14,515 | |
| 186 | 0604258A | TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 10,668 | 10,668 | |
| 187 | 0604759A | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 106,270 | 106,270 | |
| 188 | 0605103A | RAND ARROYO CENTER | 13,481 | 13,481 | |
| 189 | 0605301A | ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL | 231,824 | 231,824 | |
| 190 | 0605326A | CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM | 54,898 | 54,898 | |
| 192 | 0605601A | ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES | 350,359 | 365,359 | |
| Program increase—Army directed energy T&E | [15,000] | ||||
| 193 | 0605602A | ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS | 48,475 | 48,475 | |
| 194 | 0605604A | SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS | 36,001 | 36,001 | |
| 195 | 0605606A | AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION | 2,736 | 2,736 | |
| 196 | 0605702A | METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES | 6,488 | 6,488 | |
| 197 | 0605706A | MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS | 21,859 | 21,859 | |
| 198 | 0605709A | EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS | 7,936 | 7,936 | |
| 199 | 0605712A | SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING | 54,470 | 54,470 | |
| 200 | 0605716A | ARMY EVALUATION CENTER | 63,141 | 63,141 | |
| 201 | 0605718A | ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG | 2,572 | 2,572 | |
| 202 | 0605801A | PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES | 87,472 | 87,472 | |
| 203 | 0605803A | TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES | 26,244 | 26,244 | |
| 204 | 0605805A | MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY | 40,133 | 40,133 | |
| 205 | 0605857A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT | 1,780 | 1,780 | |
| 206 | 0605898A | ARMY DIRECT REPORT HEADQUARTERS—R&D - MHA | 55,045 | 55,045 | |
| 208 | 0606002A | RONALD REAGAN BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST SITE | 71,306 | 71,306 | |
| 209 | 0606003A | COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION | 1,063 | 1,063 | |
| 210 | 0606105A | MEDICAL PROGRAM-WIDE ACTIVITIES | 19,891 | 19,891 | |
| 211 | 0606942A | ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES | 4,496 | 4,496 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,333,123 | 1,348,123 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 214 | 0603778A | MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 10,157 | 10,157 | |
| 216 | 0605024A | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 8,682 | 8,682 | |
| 217 | 0607131A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 20,409 | 20,409 | |
| 219 | 0607134A | LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES (LRPF) | 122,733 | 115,233 | |
| Excess funds due to second vendor dropped | [–7,500] | ||||
| 221 | 0607136A | BLACKHAWK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 11,236 | 11,236 | |
| 222 | 0607137A | CHINOOK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 46,091 | 46,091 | |
| 224 | 0607139A | IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM | 249,257 | 249,257 | |
| 225 | 0607142A | AVIATION ROCKET SYSTEM PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT | 17,155 | 17,155 | |
| 226 | 0607143A | UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS | 7,743 | 7,743 | |
| 227 | 0607145A | APACHE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT | 77,177 | 77,177 | |
| 228 | 0607150A | INTEL CYBER DEVELOPMENT | 14,652 | 14,652 | |
| 229 | 0607312A | ARMY OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 35,851 | 35,851 | |
| 230 | 0607665A | FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS | 1,324 | 1,324 | |
| 231 | 0607865A | PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT | 187,840 | 187,840 | |
| 232 | 0203728A | JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS) | 44,691 | 44,691 | |
| 233 | 0203735A | COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 268,919 | 268,919 | |
| 234 | 0203743A | 155MM SELF-PROPELLED HOWITZER IMPROVEMENTS | 427,254 | 427,254 | |
| 235 | 0203744A | AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 11,688 | 11,688 | |
| 236 | 0203752A | AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 80 | 80 | |
| 237 | 0203758A | DIGITIZATION | 4,516 | 4,516 | |
| 238 | 0203801A | MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 1,288 | 1,288 | |
| 239 | 0203802A | OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 79,424 | 79,424 | |
| 243 | 0205412A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV | 259 | 259 | |
| 244 | 0205456A | LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM | 166 | 166 | |
| 245 | 0205778A | GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS) | 75,575 | 93,075 | |
| Qualification of second SRM source | [17,500] | ||||
| 246 | 0208053A | JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM | 9,510 | 9,510 | |
| 249 | 0303140A | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 29,270 | 29,270 | |
| 250 | 0303141A | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 86,908 | 86,908 | |
| 251 | 0303142A | SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) | 18,684 | 18,684 | |
| 256 | 0305179A | INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) | 467 | 467 | |
| 257 | 0305204A | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 4,051 | 4,051 | |
| 258 | 0305206A | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 13,283 | 13,283 | |
| 259 | 0305208A | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 47,204 | 47,204 | |
| 264 | 0708045A | END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES | 61,012 | 78,512 | |
| Functional fabrics manufacturing | [7,500] | ||||
| Nanoscale materials manufacturing | [5,000] | ||||
| Tungsten manufacturing for armanents | [5,000] | ||||
| 999 | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,983 | 3,983 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 1,998,539 | 2,026,039 | |||
| SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | |||||
| 267 | 0608041A | DEFENSIVE CYBER—SOFTWARE PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT | 46,445 | 46,445 | |
| SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | 46,445 | 46,445 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 12,587,343 | 12,710,343 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 1 | 0601103N | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 116,816 | 118,816 | |
| Defense University Research and Instrumentation Program | [2,000] | ||||
| 2 | 0601152N | IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH | 19,113 | 19,113 | |
| 3 | 0601153N | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 467,158 | 480,158 | |
| Increase in basic research | [10,000] | ||||
| Predictive modeling for undersea vehicles | [3,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 603,087 | 618,087 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 4 | 0602114N | POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 17,792 | 17,792 | |
| 5 | 0602123N | FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 122,281 | 140,281 | |
| Direct air capture and blue carbon removal technology program | [8,000] | ||||
| Electric propulsion for military craft and advanced planning hulls | [2,000] | ||||
| Expeditionary unmanned systems launch and recovery | [5,000] | ||||
| Testbed for autonomous ship systems | [3,000] | ||||
| 6 | 0602131M | MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY | 50,623 | 53,623 | |
| Interdisciplinary cybersecurity research | [3,000] | ||||
| 7 | 0602235N | COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH | 48,001 | 48,001 | |
| 8 | 0602236N | WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH | 67,765 | 74,765 | |
| Humanoid robotics research | [4,000] | ||||
| Social networks and computational social science | [3,000] | ||||
| 9 | 0602271N | ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH | 84,994 | 84,994 | |
| 10 | 0602435N | OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH | 63,392 | 63,392 | |
| 11 | 0602651M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH | 6,343 | 6,343 | |
| 12 | 0602747N | UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH | 56,397 | 63,897 | |
| Navy and academia submarine partnerships | [7,500] | ||||
| 13 | 0602750N | FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH | 167,590 | 167,590 | |
| 14 | 0602782N | MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH | 30,715 | 30,715 | |
| 15 | 0602792N | INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) APPLIED RESEARCH | 160,537 | 167,837 | |
| Thermoplastic materials | [7,300] | ||||
| 16 | 0602861N | SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT—ONR FIELD ACITIVITIES | 76,745 | 76,745 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 953,175 | 995,975 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 17 | 0603123N | FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 24,410 | 24,410 | |
| 18 | 0603271N | ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 8,008 | 8,008 | |
| 19 | 0603640M | USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) | 219,045 | 222,045 | |
| Mission planning advanced technology demonstration | [3,000] | ||||
| 20 | 0603651M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 13,301 | 13,301 | |
| 21 | 0603673N | FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 246,054 | 246,054 | |
| 22 | 0603680N | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 60,122 | 60,122 | |
| 23 | 0603729N | WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 4,851 | 4,851 | |
| 24 | 0603758N | NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS | 40,709 | 40,709 | |
| 25 | 0603782N | MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 1,948 | 1,948 | |
| 26 | 0603801N | INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 141,948 | 141,948 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 760,396 | 763,396 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 27 | 0603178N | MEDIUM AND LARGE UNMANNED SURFACE VEHICLES (USVS) | 464,042 | 0 | |
| Excess procurement ahead of satisfactory testing | [–464,042] | ||||
| 28 | 0603207N | AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS | 35,386 | 35,386 | |
| 29 | 0603216N | AVIATION SURVIVABILITY | 13,428 | 13,428 | |
| 30 | 0603239N | ISO NAVAL CONSTRUCTION FORCES | 2,350 | 2,350 | |
| 31 | 0603251N | AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS | 418 | 418 | |
| 32 | 0603254N | ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 15,719 | 15,719 | |
| 33 | 0603261N | TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE | 3,411 | 3,411 | |
| 34 | 0603382N | ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY | 70,218 | 56,118 | |
| Project 3416: HIJENKS insufficient schedule justification | [–7,000] | ||||
| Project 3422: SHARC excess platforms ahead of satisfactory testing | [–7,100] | ||||
| 35 | 0603502N | SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES | 52,358 | 24,158 | |
| Project 2989: Barracuda program delay | [–28,200] | ||||
| 36 | 0603506N | SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE | 12,816 | 12,816 | |
| 37 | 0603512N | CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 7,559 | 7,559 | |
| 38 | 0603525N | PILOT FISH | 358,757 | 358,757 | |
| 39 | 0603527N | RETRACT LARCH | 12,562 | 12,562 | |
| 40 | 0603536N | RETRACT JUNIPER | 148,000 | 148,000 | |
| 41 | 0603542N | RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL | 778 | 778 | |
| 42 | 0603553N | SURFACE ASW | 1,161 | 1,161 | |
| 43 | 0603561N | ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 185,356 | 195,356 | |
| Out-of-autoclave submarine technology development | [20,000] | ||||
| Project 9710: EDMs early to need | [–10,000] | ||||
| 44 | 0603562N | SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS | 10,528 | 10,528 | |
| 45 | 0603563N | SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN | 126,396 | 63,296 | |
| Project 2196: Future surface combatant early to need | [–19,100] | ||||
| Project 3161: Program increase for CBM+ initiative | [16,000] | ||||
| Project 4044: Medium amphibious ship early to need | [–30,000] | ||||
| Project 4045: Medium logistics ship early to need | [–30,000] | ||||
| 46 | 0603564N | SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES | 70,270 | 28,970 | |
| Project 0411: LSC preliminary design and CDD early to need | [–41,300] | ||||
| 47 | 0603570N | ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS | 149,188 | 149,188 | |
| 48 | 0603573N | ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS | 38,449 | 238,449 | |
| Accelerate ITF to achieve full test capability in FY23 | [75,000] | ||||
| Accelerate qualification of silicon carbide power modules | [10,000] | ||||
| USV autonomy development | [45,000] | ||||
| USV engine and generator qualification testing | [70,000] | ||||
| 49 | 0603576N | CHALK EAGLE | 71,181 | 71,181 | |
| 50 | 0603581N | LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) | 32,178 | 27,178 | |
| Project 3096: Available prior year funds | [–5,000] | ||||
| 51 | 0603582N | COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION | 17,843 | 17,843 | |
| 52 | 0603595N | OHIO REPLACEMENT | 317,196 | 317,196 | |
| 53 | 0603596N | LCS MISSION MODULES | 67,875 | 32,875 | |
| Project 2550: LCS MCM MP outdated IMS and TEMP | [–20,000] | ||||
| Project 2551: LCS ASW MP available prior year funds due to testing delays | [–15,000] | ||||
| 54 | 0603597N | AUTOMATED TEST AND ANALYSIS | 4,797 | 4,797 | |
| 55 | 0603599N | FRIGATE DEVELOPMENT | 82,309 | 82,309 | |
| 56 | 0603609N | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS | 9,922 | 2,122 | |
| Project 0363: Insufficient justification | [–7,800] | ||||
| 57 | 0603635M | MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM | 189,603 | 189,603 | |
| 58 | 0603654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 43,084 | 43,084 | |
| 59 | 0603713N | OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 6,346 | 6,346 | |
| 60 | 0603721N | ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION | 20,601 | 20,601 | |
| 61 | 0603724N | NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM | 23,422 | 23,422 | |
| 62 | 0603725N | FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT | 4,664 | 4,664 | |
| 63 | 0603734N | CHALK CORAL | 545,763 | 545,763 | |
| 64 | 0603739N | NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY | 3,884 | 3,884 | |
| 65 | 0603746N | RETRACT MAPLE | 353,226 | 353,226 | |
| 66 | 0603748N | LINK PLUMERIA | 544,388 | 544,388 | |
| 67 | 0603751N | RETRACT ELM | 86,730 | 86,730 | |
| 68 | 0603764M | LINK EVERGREEN | 236,234 | 236,234 | |
| 70 | 0603790N | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 6,880 | 6,880 | |
| 71 | 0603795N | LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY | 10,578 | 10,578 | |
| 72 | 0603851M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING | 28,435 | 28,435 | |
| 73 | 0603860N | JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL | 33,612 | 33,612 | |
| 74 | 0603925N | DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS | 128,845 | 113,845 | |
| Project 3402: Excess engineering and sustainment support | [–15,000] | ||||
| 75 | 0604014N | F/A –18 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) | 84,190 | 84,190 | |
| 76 | 0604027N | DIGITAL WARFARE OFFICE | 54,699 | 54,699 | |
| 77 | 0604028N | SMALL AND MEDIUM UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES | 53,942 | 53,942 | |
| 78 | 0604029N | UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLE CORE TECHNOLOGIES | 40,060 | 40,060 | |
| 79 | 0604030N | RAPID PROTOTYPING, EXPERIMENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION. | 12,100 | 12,100 | |
| 80 | 0604031N | LARGE UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES | 78,122 | 42,122 | |
| Project 2094: Excess procurement ahead of phase 1 testing | [–36,000] | ||||
| 81 | 0604112N | GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80) | 107,895 | 107,895 | |
| 82 | 0604126N | LITTORAL AIRBORNE MCM | 17,366 | 17,366 | |
| 83 | 0604127N | SURFACE MINE COUNTERMEASURES | 18,754 | 18,754 | |
| 84 | 0604272N | TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) | 59,776 | 59,776 | |
| 86 | 0604292N | FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT (MARITIME STRIKE) | 5,097 | 5,097 | |
| 87 | 0604320M | RAPID TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY PROTOTYPE | 3,664 | 3,664 | |
| 88 | 0604454N | LX (R) | 10,203 | 10,203 | |
| 89 | 0604536N | ADVANCED UNDERSEA PROTOTYPING | 115,858 | 95,858 | |
| Orca UUV testing delay and uncertified test strategy | [–10,000] | ||||
| Snakehead UUV uncertified test strategy | [–10,000] | ||||
| 90 | 0604636N | COUNTER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (C-UAS) | 14,259 | 14,259 | |
| 91 | 0604659N | PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM | 1,102,387 | 1,045,387 | |
| Lack of hypersonic prototyping coordination | [–5,000] | ||||
| Project 3334: Excess Virginia-class CPS modification and installation costs | [–52,000] | ||||
| 92 | 0604707N | SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT | 7,657 | 7,657 | |
| 93 | 0604786N | OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT | 35,750 | 35,750 | |
| 94 | 0303354N | ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP | 9,151 | 9,151 | |
| 95 | 0304240M | ADVANCED TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM | 22,589 | 22,589 | |
| 97 | 0304270N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP | 809 | 809 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 6,503,074 | 5,926,532 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 98 | 0603208N | TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT | 4,332 | 4,332 | |
| 99 | 0604212N | OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT | 18,133 | 23,133 | |
| Program increase for Attack and Utility Replacement Aircraft | [5,000] | ||||
| 100 | 0604214M | AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV | 20,054 | 20,054 | |
| 101 | 0604215N | STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT | 4,237 | 4,237 | |
| 102 | 0604216N | MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT | 27,340 | 27,340 | |
| 104 | 0604221N | P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 606 | 606 | |
| 105 | 0604230N | WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 9,065 | 9,065 | |
| 106 | 0604231N | TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM | 97,968 | 97,968 | |
| 107 | 0604234N | ADVANCED HAWKEYE | 309,373 | 309,373 | |
| 108 | 0604245M | H–1 UPGRADES | 62,310 | 62,310 | |
| 109 | 0604261N | ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS | 47,182 | 47,182 | |
| 110 | 0604262N | V–22A | 132,624 | 132,624 | |
| 111 | 0604264N | AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 21,445 | 21,445 | |
| 112 | 0604269N | EA–18 | 106,134 | 106,134 | |
| 113 | 0604270N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 134,194 | 134,194 | |
| 114 | 0604273M | EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT | 99,321 | 99,321 | |
| 115 | 0604274N | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) | 477,680 | 477,680 | |
| 116 | 0604280N | JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) | 232,818 | 232,818 | |
| 117 | 0604282N | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) INCREMENT II | 170,039 | 170,039 | |
| 118 | 0604307N | SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING | 403,712 | 403,712 | |
| 119 | 0604311N | LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 945 | 945 | |
| 120 | 0604329N | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) | 62,488 | 62,488 | |
| 121 | 0604366N | STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS | 386,225 | 386,225 | |
| 122 | 0604373N | AIRBORNE MCM | 10,909 | 10,909 | |
| 123 | 0604378N | NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 44,548 | 44,548 | |
| 124 | 0604419N | ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM (ASAP) | 13,673 | 13,673 | |
| 125 | 0604501N | ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS | 87,809 | 87,809 | |
| 126 | 0604503N | SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION | 93,097 | 93,097 | |
| 127 | 0604504N | AIR CONTROL | 38,863 | 38,863 | |
| 128 | 0604512N | SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS | 9,593 | 9,593 | |
| 129 | 0604518N | COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION | 12,718 | 12,718 | |
| 130 | 0604522N | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM | 78,319 | 78,319 | |
| 131 | 0604530N | ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) | 65,834 | 65,834 | |
| 132 | 0604558N | NEW DESIGN SSN | 259,443 | 259,443 | |
| 133 | 0604562N | SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM | 63,878 | 58,878 | |
| AN/BYG–1 APB17 and APB19 testing delays | [–5,000] | ||||
| 134 | 0604567N | SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E | 51,853 | 66,753 | |
| Advanced degaussing DDG–51 retrofit and demonstration | [14,900] | ||||
| 135 | 0604574N | NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES | 3,853 | 3,853 | |
| 136 | 0604601N | MINE DEVELOPMENT | 92,607 | 92,607 | |
| 137 | 0604610N | LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT | 146,012 | 116,012 | |
| Project 1412: HAAWC operational testing delays | [–10,000] | ||||
| Project 3418: Mk 54 Mod 2 contract delays | [–20,000] | ||||
| 138 | 0604654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 8,383 | 8,383 | |
| 139 | 0604657M | USMC GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 33,784 | 33,784 | |
| 140 | 0604703N | PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS | 8,599 | 8,599 | |
| 141 | 0604727N | JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS | 73,744 | 73,744 | |
| 142 | 0604755N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) | 157,490 | 157,490 | |
| 143 | 0604756N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) | 121,761 | 121,761 | |
| 144 | 0604757N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) | 89,373 | 89,373 | |
| 145 | 0604761N | INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING | 15,716 | 15,716 | |
| 146 | 0604771N | MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT | 2,120 | 2,120 | |
| 147 | 0604777N | NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM | 50,180 | 50,180 | |
| 148 | 0604800M | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD | 561 | 561 | |
| 149 | 0604800N | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD | 250 | 250 | |
| 150 | 0604850N | SSN(X) | 1,000 | 1,000 | |
| 151 | 0605013M | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 974 | 974 | |
| 152 | 0605013N | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 356,173 | 356,173 | |
| 153 | 0605024N | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 7,810 | 7,810 | |
| 154 | 0605212M | CH–53K RDTE | 406,406 | 406,406 | |
| 155 | 0605215N | MISSION PLANNING | 86,134 | 86,134 | |
| 156 | 0605217N | COMMON AVIONICS | 54,540 | 54,540 | |
| 157 | 0605220N | SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC) | 5,155 | 5,155 | |
| 158 | 0605327N | T-AO 205 CLASS | 5,148 | 5,148 | |
| 159 | 0605414N | UNMANNED CARRIER AVIATION (UCA) | 266,970 | 266,970 | |
| 160 | 0605450M | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 12,713 | 12,713 | |
| 161 | 0605500N | MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) | 24,424 | 24,424 | |
| 162 | 0605504N | MULTI-MISSION MARITIME (MMA) INCREMENT III | 182,870 | 182,870 | |
| 163 | 0605611M | MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 41,775 | 41,775 | |
| 164 | 0605813M | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 2,541 | 2,541 | |
| 165 | 0204202N | DDG–1000 | 208,448 | 208,448 | |
| 169 | 0304785N | TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS | 111,434 | 111,434 | |
| 170 | 0306250M | CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 26,173 | 26,173 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 6,263,883 | 6,248,783 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 171 | 0604256N | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 22,075 | 22,075 | |
| 172 | 0604258N | TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 10,224 | 10,224 | |
| 173 | 0604759N | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 85,195 | 85,195 | |
| 175 | 0605152N | STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY | 3,089 | 3,089 | |
| 176 | 0605154N | CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES | 43,517 | 43,517 | |
| 179 | 0605804N | TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES | 932 | 932 | |
| 180 | 0605853N | MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 94,297 | 94,297 | |
| 181 | 0605856N | STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT | 3,813 | 3,813 | |
| 183 | 0605863N | RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT | 104,822 | 104,822 | |
| 184 | 0605864N | TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 446,960 | 446,960 | |
| 185 | 0605865N | OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY | 27,241 | 27,241 | |
| 186 | 0605866N | NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT | 15,787 | 15,787 | |
| 187 | 0605867N | SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT | 8,559 | 8,559 | |
| 188 | 0605873M | MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT | 42,749 | 42,749 | |
| 189 | 0605898N | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 41,094 | 41,094 | |
| 190 | 0606355N | WARFARE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT | 37,022 | 37,022 | |
| 193 | 0305327N | INSIDER THREAT | 2,310 | 2,310 | |
| 194 | 0902498N | MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (DEPARTMENTAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES) | 1,536 | 1,536 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 991,222 | 991,222 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 199 | 0604227N | HARPOON MODIFICATIONS | 697 | 697 | |
| 200 | 0604840M | F–35 C2D2 | 379,549 | 379,549 | |
| 201 | 0604840N | F–35 C2D2 | 413,875 | 413,875 | |
| 202 | 0607658N | COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY (CEC) | 143,667 | 143,667 | |
| 204 | 0101221N | STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT | 173,056 | 173,056 | |
| 205 | 0101224N | SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 45,970 | 45,970 | |
| 206 | 0101226N | SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 69,190 | 61,190 | |
| CRAW EDM (TI–2) early to need | [–8,000] | ||||
| 207 | 0101402N | NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS | 42,277 | 42,277 | |
| 208 | 0204136N | F/A–18 SQUADRONS | 171,030 | 171,030 | |
| 210 | 0204228N | SURFACE SUPPORT | 33,482 | 33,482 | |
| 211 | 0204229N | TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) | 200,308 | 200,308 | |
| 212 | 0204311N | INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 102,975 | 152,975 | |
| Accelerate sensor and signal processing development | [25,000] | ||||
| Program increase for spiral 1 TRAPS units | [25,000] | ||||
| 213 | 0204313N | SHIP-TOWED ARRAY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS | 10,873 | 10,873 | |
| 214 | 0204413N | AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) | 1,713 | 6,713 | |
| Program increase for LCAC composite component manufacturing | [5,000] | ||||
| 215 | 0204460M | GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) | 22,205 | 105,805 | |
| Program increase for G/ATOR and SM–6 stand-alone engagement analysis | [10,000] | ||||
| Program increase for USMC G/ATOR and SM–6 demonstration | [73,600] | ||||
| 216 | 0204571N | CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 83,956 | 83,956 | |
| 218 | 0204575N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT | 56,791 | 56,791 | |
| 219 | 0205601N | HARM IMPROVEMENT | 146,166 | 146,166 | |
| 221 | 0205620N | SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION | 29,348 | 29,348 | |
| 222 | 0205632N | MK–48 ADCAP | 110,349 | 110,349 | |
| 223 | 0205633N | AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS | 133,953 | 133,953 | |
| 224 | 0205675N | OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS | 110,313 | 110,313 | |
| 225 | 0206313M | MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 207,662 | 207,662 | |
| 226 | 0206335M | COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S) | 4,406 | 4,406 | |
| 227 | 0206623M | MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS | 61,381 | 61,381 | |
| 228 | 0206624M | MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT | 10,421 | 10,421 | |
| 229 | 0206625M | USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) | 29,977 | 29,977 | |
| 230 | 0206629M | AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE | 6,469 | 6,469 | |
| 231 | 0207161N | TACTICAL AIM MISSILES | 5,859 | 5,859 | |
| 232 | 0207163N | ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) | 44,323 | 44,323 | |
| 236 | 0303109N | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) | 41,978 | 41,978 | |
| 237 | 0303138N | CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) | 29,684 | 29,684 | |
| 238 | 0303140N | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 39,094 | 39,094 | |
| 239 | 0305192N | MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES | 6,154 | 6,154 | |
| 240 | 0305204N | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 7,108 | 7,108 | |
| 241 | 0305205N | UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY | 62,098 | 62,098 | |
| 242 | 0305208M | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 21,500 | 21,500 | |
| 244 | 0305220N | MQ–4C TRITON | 11,120 | 11,120 | |
| 245 | 0305231N | MQ–8 UAV | 28,968 | 28,968 | |
| 246 | 0305232M | RQ–11 UAV | 537 | 537 | |
| 247 | 0305234N | SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) | 8,773 | 8,773 | |
| 248 | 0305239M | RQ–21A | 10,853 | 10,853 | |
| 249 | 0305241N | MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT | 60,413 | 60,413 | |
| 250 | 0305242M | UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP) | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| 251 | 0305251N | CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT | 34,967 | 44,967 | |
| Cyber tool development | [10,000] | ||||
| 252 | 0305421N | RQ–4 MODERNIZATION | 178,799 | 178,799 | |
| 253 | 0307577N | INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) | 2,120 | 2,120 | |
| 254 | 0308601N | MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT | 8,683 | 8,683 | |
| 255 | 0702207N | DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) | 45,168 | 45,168 | |
| 256 | 0708730N | MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) | 6,697 | 6,697 | |
| 257 | 1203109N | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) | 70,056 | 70,056 | |
| 999 | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,795,032 | 1,795,032 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 5,327,043 | 5,467,643 | |||
| SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | |||||
| 258 | 0608013N | RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM | 14,300 | 14,300 | |
| 259 | 0608231N | MARITIME TACTICAL COMMAND AND CONTROL (MTC2)—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM | 10,868 | 10,868 | |
| SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | 25,168 | 25,168 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 21,427,048 | 21,036,806 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 1 | 0601102F | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 315,348 | 325,348 | |
| Increase in basic research | [10,000] | ||||
| 2 | 0601103F | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 161,861 | 161,861 | |
| 3 | 0601108F | HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 15,085 | 15,085 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 492,294 | 502,294 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 4 | 0602020F | FUTURE AF CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH | 100,000 | 100,000 | |
| 5 | 0602102F | MATERIALS | 140,781 | 160,281 | |
| High-energy synchotron x-ray program | [5,000] | ||||
| Materials maturation for high mach systems | [5,000] | ||||
| Metals Affordability Initiative | [5,000] | ||||
| Qualification of additive manufacturing processes | [2,000] | ||||
| Techniques to repair fasteners | [2,500] | ||||
| 6 | 0602201F | AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES | 349,225 | 359,225 | |
| Hypersonic materials | [10,000] | ||||
| 7 | 0602202F | HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH | 115,222 | 115,222 | |
| 9 | 0602204F | AEROSPACE SENSORS | 211,301 | 211,301 | |
| 11 | 0602298F | SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT— MAJOR HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES | 8,926 | 8,926 | |
| 12 | 0602602F | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS | 132,425 | 132,425 | |
| 13 | 0602605F | DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY | 128,113 | 128,113 | |
| 14 | 0602788F | DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS | 178,668 | 178,668 | |
| 15 | 0602890F | HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH | 45,088 | 45,088 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 1,409,749 | 1,439,249 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 17 | 0603030F | AF FOUNDATIONAL DEVELOPMENT/DEMOS | 103,280 | 103,280 | |
| 18 | 0603032F | FUTURE AF INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY DEMOS | 157,619 | 107,619 | |
| Golden Horde too mature for science and technology prototype | [–50,000] | ||||
| 19 | 0603033F | NEXT GEN PLATFORM DEV/DEMO | 199,556 | 208,556 | |
| B–52 pylon fairings | [3,000] | ||||
| C–130 finlets | [3,000] | ||||
| KC–135 aft body drag | [3,000] | ||||
| 20 | 0603034F | PERSISTENT KNOWLEDGE, AWARENESS, & C2 TECH | 102,276 | 102,276 | |
| 21 | 0603035F | NEXT GEN EFFECTS DEV/DEMOS | 215,817 | 215,817 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 778,548 | 737,548 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 38 | 0603260F | INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 4,320 | 4,320 | |
| 39 | 0603742F | COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY | 26,396 | 26,396 | |
| 40 | 0603790F | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 3,647 | 3,647 | |
| 41 | 0603851F | INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL | 32,959 | 32,959 | |
| 43 | 0604002F | AIR FORCE WEATHER SERVICES RESEARCH | 869 | 869 | |
| 44 | 0604003F | ADVANCED BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ABMS) | 302,323 | 302,323 | |
| 45 | 0604004F | ADVANCED ENGINE DEVELOPMENT | 636,495 | 686,495 | |
| AETP program acceleration | [50,000] | ||||
| 46 | 0604015F | LONG RANGE STRIKE—BOMBER | 2,848,410 | 2,848,410 | |
| 47 | 0604032F | DIRECTED ENERGY PROTOTYPING | 20,964 | 25,964 | |
| Directed energy counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (CUAS) | [5,000] | ||||
| 48 | 0604033F | HYPERSONICS PROTOTYPING | 381,862 | 446,862 | |
| HAWC program increase | [65,000] | ||||
| 50 | 0604257F | ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SENSORS | 24,747 | 24,747 | |
| 51 | 0604288F | NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPS CENTER (NAOC) RECAP | 76,417 | 76,417 | |
| 52 | 0604317F | TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 3,011 | 3,011 | |
| 53 | 0604327F | HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM | 52,921 | 52,921 | |
| 54 | 0604414F | CYBER RESILIENCY OF WEAPON SYSTEMS-ACS | 69,783 | 69,783 | |
| 55 | 0604776F | DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D | 25,835 | 25,835 | |
| 56 | 0604858F | TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM | 219,252 | 455,252 | |
| Agile software development and operations | [4,500] | ||||
| Initial polar MILSATCOM capability | [46,000] | ||||
| KC–135 vertical wipers | [2,000] | ||||
| KC–135 winglets | [10,000] | ||||
| LCAAT program acceleration | [128,000] | ||||
| Long-endurance UAS | [33,500] | ||||
| Rapid repair of high performance materials | [6,000] | ||||
| Small satellite acceleration | [6,000] | ||||
| 57 | 0605230F | GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT | 1,524,759 | 1,524,759 | |
| 59 | 0207110F | NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE | 1,044,089 | 1,044,089 | |
| 60 | 0207455F | THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) | 19,356 | 19,356 | |
| 61 | 0207522F | AIRBASE AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS (ABADS) | 8,737 | 8,737 | |
| 62 | 0208099F | UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) | 5,990 | 5,990 | |
| 63 | 0305236F | COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT (CDL EA) | 39,293 | 39,293 | |
| 65 | 0305601F | MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENTS | 11,430 | 11,430 | |
| 66 | 0306250F | CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 259,823 | 259,823 | |
| 67 | 0306415F | ENABLED CYBER ACTIVITIES | 10,560 | 10,560 | |
| 68 | 0401310F | C–32 EXECUTIVE TRANSPORT RECAPITALIZATION | 9,908 | 9,908 | |
| 69 | 0901410F | CONTRACTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM | 8,662 | 8,662 | |
| 74 | 1206427F | SPACE SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE TRANSITIONS (SSPT) | 8,787 | 8,787 | |
| 77 | 1206730F | SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM | 56,311 | 56,311 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 7,737,916 | 8,093,916 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 82 | 0604200F | FUTURE ADVANCED WEAPON ANALYSIS & PROGRAMS | 25,161 | 25,161 | |
| 83 | 0604201F | PNT RESILIENCY, MODS, AND IMPROVEMENTS | 38,564 | 38,564 | |
| 84 | 0604222F | NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT | 35,033 | 35,033 | |
| 85 | 0604270F | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 2,098 | 2,098 | |
| 86 | 0604281F | TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE | 131,909 | 131,909 | |
| 87 | 0604287F | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 6,752 | 6,752 | |
| 88 | 0604329F | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD | 17,280 | 17,280 | |
| 89 | 0604429F | AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK | 0 | 30,000 | |
| STiTCHES integration | [30,000] | ||||
| 90 | 0604602F | ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 23,076 | 23,076 | |
| 91 | 0604604F | SUBMUNITIONS | 3,091 | 3,091 | |
| 92 | 0604617F | AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT | 20,609 | 20,609 | |
| 93 | 0604618F | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 7,926 | 7,926 | |
| 94 | 0604706F | LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS | 23,660 | 23,660 | |
| 95 | 0604735F | COMBAT TRAINING RANGES | 8,898 | 8,898 | |
| 96 | 0604800F | F–35—EMD | 5,423 | 5,423 | |
| 97 | 0604932F | LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON | 474,430 | 474,430 | |
| 98 | 0604933F | ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION | 167,099 | 167,099 | |
| 100 | 0605056F | OPEN ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT | 30,547 | 30,547 | |
| 102 | 0605223F | ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING | 248,669 | 254,669 | |
| SLATE/VR training | [6,000] | ||||
| 103 | 0605229F | COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER | 63,169 | 63,169 | |
| 105 | 0101125F | NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION | 9,683 | 9,683 | |
| 106 | 0207171F | F–15 EPAWSS | 170,679 | 170,679 | |
| 107 | 0207328F | STAND IN ATTACK WEAPON | 160,438 | 160,438 | |
| 108 | 0207701F | FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING | 9,422 | 9,422 | |
| 110 | 0305176F | COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR | 973 | 973 | |
| 111 | 0401221F | KC–46A TANKER SQUADRONS | 106,262 | 106,262 | |
| 113 | 0401319F | VC–25B | 800,889 | 800,889 | |
| 114 | 0701212F | AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS | 10,673 | 10,673 | |
| 115 | 0804772F | TRAINING DEVELOPMENTS | 4,479 | 4,479 | |
| 116 | 0901299F | AF A1 SYSTEMS | 8,467 | 8,467 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 2,615,359 | 2,651,359 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 131 | 0604256F | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 57,725 | 57,725 | |
| 132 | 0604759F | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 208,680 | 223,680 | |
| Gulf Range telemetric modernization | [15,000] | ||||
| 133 | 0605101F | RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE | 35,803 | 35,803 | |
| 135 | 0605712F | INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION | 13,557 | 13,557 | |
| 136 | 0605807F | TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 764,606 | 764,606 | |
| 142 | 0605831F | ACQ WORKFORCE- CAPABILITY INTEGRATION | 1,362,038 | 1,362,038 | |
| 143 | 0605832F | ACQ WORKFORCE- ADVANCED PRGM TECHNOLOGY | 40,768 | 40,768 | |
| 144 | 0605833F | ACQ WORKFORCE- NUCLEAR SYSTEMS | 179,646 | 179,646 | |
| 145 | 0605898F | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 5,734 | 5,734 | |
| 146 | 0605976F | FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 70,985 | 70,985 | |
| 147 | 0605978F | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 29,880 | 29,880 | |
| 148 | 0606017F | REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION | 63,381 | 63,381 | |
| 149 | 0606398F | MANAGEMENT HQ—T&E | 5,785 | 5,785 | |
| 150 | 0303255F | COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATION, AND COMPUTERS (C4)—STRATCOM | 24,564 | 24,564 | |
| 151 | 0308602F | ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS) | 9,883 | 2,383 | |
| Acq strat incompatible with AF digital mod strategy | [–7,500] | ||||
| 152 | 0702806F | ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 13,384 | 13,384 | |
| 153 | 0804731F | GENERAL SKILL TRAINING | 1,262 | 1,262 | |
| 155 | 1001004F | INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES | 3,599 | 3,599 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 2,891,280 | 2,898,780 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 163 | 0604233F | SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING | 8,777 | 8,777 | |
| 164 | 0604776F | DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D | 499 | 499 | |
| 165 | 0604840F | F–35 C2D2 | 785,336 | 785,336 | |
| 166 | 0605018F | AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) | 27,035 | 7,035 | |
| Poor agile development strategy | [–20,000] | ||||
| 167 | 0605024F | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY | 50,508 | 50,508 | |
| 168 | 0605117F | FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION | 71,229 | 71,229 | |
| 169 | 0605278F | HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E | 24,705 | 24,705 | |
| 170 | 0606018F | NC3 INTEGRATION | 26,356 | 26,356 | |
| 172 | 0101113F | B–52 SQUADRONS | 520,023 | 520,023 | |
| 173 | 0101122F | AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) | 1,433 | 1,433 | |
| 174 | 0101126F | B–1B SQUADRONS | 15,766 | 26,566 | |
| USAF-requested transfer from APAF Lines 22, 24 | [10,800] | ||||
| 175 | 0101127F | B–2 SQUADRONS | 187,399 | 187,399 | |
| 176 | 0101213F | MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS | 116,569 | 116,569 | |
| 177 | 0101316F | WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS | 27,235 | 27,235 | |
| 178 | 0101324F | INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLANNING & ANALYSIS NETWORK | 24,227 | 24,227 | |
| 179 | 0101328F | ICBM REENTRY VEHICLES | 112,753 | 112,753 | |
| 181 | 0102110F | UH–1N REPLACEMENT PROGRAM | 44,464 | 44,464 | |
| 182 | 0102326F | REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 5,929 | 5,929 | |
| 183 | 0102412F | NORTH WARNING SYSTEM (NWS) | 100 | 100 | |
| 184 | 0205219F | MQ–9 UAV | 162,080 | 162,080 | |
| 186 | 0207131F | A–10 SQUADRONS | 24,535 | 24,535 | |
| 187 | 0207133F | F–16 SQUADRONS | 223,437 | 223,437 | |
| 188 | 0207134F | F–15E SQUADRONS | 298,908 | 298,908 | |
| 189 | 0207136F | MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION | 14,960 | 14,960 | |
| 190 | 0207138F | F–22A SQUADRONS | 665,038 | 665,038 | |
| 191 | 0207142F | F–35 SQUADRONS | 132,229 | 132,229 | |
| 192 | 0207146F | F–15EX | 159,761 | 159,761 | |
| 193 | 0207161F | TACTICAL AIM MISSILES | 19,417 | 19,417 | |
| 194 | 0207163F | ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) | 51,799 | 51,799 | |
| 195 | 0207227F | COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE | 669 | 669 | |
| 196 | 0207247F | AF TENCAP | 21,644 | 21,644 | |
| 197 | 0207249F | PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT | 9,261 | 9,261 | |
| 198 | 0207253F | COMPASS CALL | 15,854 | 15,854 | |
| 199 | 0207268F | AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 95,896 | 95,896 | |
| 200 | 0207325F | JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) | 70,792 | 70,792 | |
| 201 | 0207410F | AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) | 51,187 | 51,187 | |
| 202 | 0207412F | CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) | 16,041 | 16,041 | |
| 203 | 0207417F | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) | 138,303 | 138,303 | |
| 204 | 0207418F | AFSPECWAR—TACP | 4,223 | 4,223 | |
| 206 | 0207431F | COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES | 16,564 | 16,564 | |
| 207 | 0207438F | THEATER BATTLE MANAGEMENT (TBM) C4I | 7,858 | 7,858 | |
| 208 | 0207444F | TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD | 12,906 | 12,906 | |
| 210 | 0207452F | DCAPES | 14,816 | 14,816 | |
| 211 | 0207521F | AIR FORCE CALIBRATION PROGRAMS | 1,970 | 1,970 | |
| 212 | 0207573F | NATIONAL TECHNICAL NUCLEAR FORENSICS | 396 | 396 | |
| 213 | 0207590F | SEEK EAGLE | 29,680 | 29,680 | |
| 214 | 0207601F | USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION | 17,666 | 17,666 | |
| 215 | 0207605F | WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS | 6,353 | 6,353 | |
| 216 | 0207610F | BATTLEFIELD ABN COMM NODE (BACN) | 6,827 | 6,827 | |
| 217 | 0207697F | DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES | 3,390 | 3,390 | |
| 218 | 0208006F | MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 91,768 | 91,768 | |
| 219 | 0208007F | TACTICAL DECEPTION | 2,370 | 2,370 | |
| 220 | 0208064F | OPERATIONAL HQ—CYBER | 5,527 | 5,527 | |
| 221 | 0208087F | DISTRIBUTED CYBER WARFARE OPERATIONS | 68,279 | 68,279 | |
| 222 | 0208088F | AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 15,165 | 15,165 | |
| 223 | 0208097F | JOINT CYBER COMMAND AND CONTROL (JCC2) | 38,480 | 38,480 | |
| 224 | 0208099F | UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) | 84,645 | 84,645 | |
| 230 | 0301025F | GEOBASE | 2,767 | 2,767 | |
| 231 | 0301112F | NUCLEAR PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM (NPES) | 32,759 | 32,759 | |
| 238 | 0301401F | AIR FORCE SPACE AND CYBER NON-TRADITIONAL ISR FOR BATTLESPACE AWARENESS | 2,904 | 2,904 | |
| 239 | 0302015F | E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) | 3,468 | 3,468 | |
| 240 | 0303131F | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) | 61,887 | 61,887 | |
| 242 | 0303140F | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 10,351 | 10,351 | |
| 243 | 0303142F | GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT—DATA INITIATIVE | 1,346 | 1,346 | |
| 246 | 0304260F | AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE | 128,110 | 128,110 | |
| 247 | 0304310F | COMMERCIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS | 4,042 | 4,042 | |
| 251 | 0305020F | CCMD INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 1,649 | 1,649 | |
| 252 | 0305022F | ISR MODERNIZATION & AUTOMATION DVMT (IMAD) | 19,265 | 19,265 | |
| 253 | 0305099F | GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) | 4,645 | 4,645 | |
| 254 | 0305103F | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 384 | 384 | |
| 255 | 0305111F | WEATHER SERVICE | 23,640 | 23,640 | |
| 256 | 0305114F | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) | 6,553 | 6,553 | |
| 257 | 0305116F | AERIAL TARGETS | 449 | 449 | |
| 260 | 0305128F | SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES | 432 | 432 | |
| 262 | 0305146F | DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 4,890 | 4,890 | |
| 264 | 0305179F | INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) | 8,864 | 8,864 | |
| 265 | 0305202F | DRAGON U–2 | 18,660 | 18,660 | |
| 267 | 0305206F | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 121,512 | 121,512 | |
| 268 | 0305207F | MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 14,711 | 14,711 | |
| 269 | 0305208F | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 14,152 | 14,152 | |
| 270 | 0305220F | RQ–4 UAV | 134,589 | 134,589 | |
| 271 | 0305221F | NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING | 15,049 | 15,049 | |
| 272 | 0305238F | NATO AGS | 36,731 | 36,731 | |
| 273 | 0305240F | SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE | 33,547 | 33,547 | |
| 274 | 0305600F | INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES | 13,635 | 17,315 | |
| PDI: Mission Partner Environment BICES-X Project 675898 | [3,680] | ||||
| 275 | 0305881F | RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION | 4,262 | 4,262 | |
| 276 | 0305984F | PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMMAND & CTRL (PRC2) | 2,207 | 2,207 | |
| 277 | 0307577F | INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) | 6,277 | 6,277 | |
| 278 | 0401115F | C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON | 41,973 | 41,973 | |
| 279 | 0401119F | C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) | 32,560 | 32,560 | |
| 280 | 0401130F | C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) | 9,991 | 12,991 | |
| C–17 microvanes | [3,000] | ||||
| 281 | 0401132F | C–130J PROGRAM | 10,674 | 10,674 | |
| 282 | 0401134F | LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) | 5,507 | 5,507 | |
| 283 | 0401218F | KC–135S | 4,591 | 4,591 | |
| 286 | 0401318F | CV–22 | 18,419 | 18,419 | |
| 288 | 0408011F | SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL | 7,673 | 7,673 | |
| 290 | 0708055F | MAINTENANCE, REPAIR & OVERHAUL SYSTEM | 24,513 | 24,513 | |
| 291 | 0708610F | LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) | 35,225 | 15,225 | |
| Poor agile development strategy | [–20,000] | ||||
| 292 | 0708611F | SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 11,838 | 11,838 | |
| 293 | 0804743F | OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING | 1,332 | 1,332 | |
| 295 | 0901202F | JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY | 2,092 | 2,092 | |
| 296 | 0901218F | CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM | 3,869 | 3,869 | |
| 297 | 0901220F | PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION | 1,584 | 1,584 | |
| 298 | 0901226F | AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY | 1,197 | 1,197 | |
| 299 | 0901538F | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 7,006 | 7,006 | |
| 300 | 0901554F | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACNTNG AND MGT SYS (DEAMS) | 45,638 | 45,638 | |
| 301 | 1201017F | GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN) | 1,889 | 1,889 | |
| 302 | 1201921F | SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES | 993 | 993 | |
| 303 | 1202140F | SERVICE SUPPORT TO SPACECOM ACTIVITIES | 8,999 | 8,999 | |
| 314 | 1203400F | SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE | 16,810 | 16,810 | |
| 316 | 1203620F | NATIONAL SPACE DEFENSE CENTER | 2,687 | 2,687 | |
| 318 | 1203906F | NCMC—TW/AA SYSTEM | 6,990 | 6,990 | |
| 999 | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 15,777,856 | 15,839,856 | |
| Air-to-air weapons development increase | [62,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 21,466,680 | 21,506,160 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | 37,391,826 | 37,829,306 | |||
| RDTE, SPACE FORCE | |||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 1 | 1206601SF | SPACE TECHNOLOGY | 130,874 | 133,874 | |
| Small satellite mission operations facility | [3,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 130,874 | 133,874 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 2 | 1203164SF | NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) | 390,704 | 370,704 | |
| MGUE program slip | [–20,000] | ||||
| 3 | 1203710SF | EO/IR WEATHER SYSTEMS | 131,000 | 131,000 | |
| 4 | 1206422SF | WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON | 83,384 | 83,384 | |
| 5 | 1206425SF | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS | 33,359 | 33,359 | |
| 6 | 1206427SF | SPACE SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE TRANSITIONS (SSPT) | 142,808 | 142,808 | |
| 7 | 1206438SF | SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY | 35,575 | 35,575 | |
| 8 | 1206760SF | PROTECTED TACTICAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE (PTES) | 114,390 | 114,390 | |
| 9 | 1206761SF | PROTECTED TACTICAL SERVICE (PTS) | 205,178 | 205,178 | |
| 10 | 1206855SF | EVOLVED STRATEGIC SATCOM (ESS) | 71,395 | 71,395 | |
| 11 | 1206857SF | SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE | 103,518 | 103,518 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 1,311,311 | 1,291,311 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 12 | 1203269SF | GPS III FOLLOW-ON (GPS IIIF) | 263,496 | 263,496 | |
| 13 | 1203940SF | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS | 41,897 | 41,897 | |
| 14 | 1206421SF | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS | 54,689 | 54,689 | |
| 15 | 1206422SFZ | WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON | 2,526 | 2,526 | |
| 16 | 1206425SFZ | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS | 173,074 | 173,074 | |
| 17 | 1206431SF | ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) | 138,257 | 138,257 | |
| 18 | 1206432SF | POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) | 190,235 | 190,235 | |
| 19 | 1206442SF | NEXT GENERATION OPIR | 2,318,864 | 2,318,864 | |
| 20 | 1206853SF | NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD | 560,978 | 590,978 | |
| NSSL Phase 3 integration activities program | [30,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 3,744,016 | 3,774,016 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 21 | 1206116SF | SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT | 20,281 | 20,281 | |
| 22 | 1206392SF | ACQ WORKFORCE—SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS | 183,930 | 183,930 | |
| 23 | 1206398SF | SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER—MHA | 9,765 | 9,765 | |
| 24 | 1206860SF | ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) | 17,993 | 17,993 | |
| 25 | 1206864SF | SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) | 26,541 | 26,541 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 258,510 | 258,510 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 26 | 1201017SF | GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN) | 3,708 | 3,708 | |
| 27 | 1203001SF | FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS (FAB-T) | 247,229 | 247,229 | |
| 28 | 1203110SF | SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) | 75,480 | 75,480 | |
| 29 | 1203165SF | NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE AND CONTROL SEGMENTS) | 1,984 | 1,984 | |
| 30 | 1203173SF | SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER | 4,397 | 4,397 | |
| 31 | 1203174SF | SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 44,746 | 44,746 | |
| 32 | 1203182SF | SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) | 11,020 | 11,020 | |
| 33 | 1203265SF | GPS III SPACE SEGMENT | 10,777 | 10,777 | |
| 34 | 1203873SF | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE RADARS | 28,179 | 46,679 | |
| Cobra Dane service life extension | [18,500] | ||||
| 35 | 1203913SF | NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) | 29,157 | 29,157 | |
| 36 | 1203940SFZ | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS | 44,809 | 51,809 | |
| Commercial SSA | [7,000] | ||||
| 37 | 1206423SF | GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT | 481,999 | 416,999 | |
| Funds available prioritized to other space missions | [–65,000] | ||||
| 41 | 1206770SF | ENTERPRISE GROUND SERVICES | 116,791 | 116,791 | |
| 999 | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,632,866 | 3,632,866 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 4,733,142 | 4,693,642 | |||
| SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | |||||
| 42 | 1203614SF | JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM | 149,742 | 149,742 | |
| SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | 149,742 | 149,742 | |||
| TOTAL RDTE, SPACE FORCE | 10,327,595 | 10,301,095 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 1 | 0601000BR | DTRA BASIC RESEARCH | 14,617 | 14,617 | |
| 2 | 0601101E | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 479,958 | 479,958 | |
| 3 | 0601110D8Z | BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 35,565 | 72,565 | |
| DEPSCoR | [20,000] | ||||
| Minerva Research initiative restore DWR cut | [17,000] | ||||
| 4 | 0601117E | BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE | 53,730 | 58,730 | |
| Traumatic brain injury medical research | [5,000] | ||||
| 5 | 0601120D8Z | NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM | 100,241 | 100,241 | |
| 6 | 0601228D8Z | HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS | 30,975 | 37,975 | |
| Aerospace education, research, and innovation activities | [2,000] | ||||
| HBCU/Minority Institutions | [5,000] | ||||
| 7 | 0601384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 45,300 | 45,300 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 760,386 | 809,386 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 8 | 0602000D8Z | JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY | 19,409 | 19,409 | |
| 9 | 0602115E | BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 107,568 | 107,568 | |
| 11 | 0602230D8Z | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION | 35,000 | 35,000 | |
| 12 | 0602234D8Z | LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM | 41,080 | 41,080 | |
| 13 | 0602251D8Z | APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES | 60,722 | 60,722 | |
| 14 | 0602303E | INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY | 435,920 | 435,920 | |
| 15 | 0602383E | BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE | 26,950 | 26,950 | |
| 16 | 0602384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 201,807 | 201,807 | |
| 17 | 0602668D8Z | CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH | 15,255 | 15,255 | |
| 18 | 0602702E | TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY | 233,271 | 233,271 | |
| 19 | 0602715E | MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY | 250,107 | 290,107 | |
| Increase in emerging biotech research | [40,000] | ||||
| 20 | 0602716E | ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY | 322,693 | 322,693 | |
| 21 | 0602718BR | COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 174,571 | 174,571 | |
| 22 | 0602751D8Z | SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH | 9,573 | 9,573 | |
| 23 | 1160401BB | SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 42,464 | 42,464 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 1,976,390 | 2,016,390 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 24 | 0603000D8Z | JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 22,920 | 22,920 | |
| 25 | 0603121D8Z | SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 4,914 | 4,914 | |
| 26 | 0603122D8Z | COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 51,089 | 51,089 | |
| 27 | 0603133D8Z | FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING | 25,183 | 25,183 | |
| 29 | 0603160BR | COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 366,659 | 366,659 | |
| 30 | 0603176C | ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT | 14,910 | 14,910 | |
| 32 | 0603180C | ADVANCED RESEARCH | 18,687 | 18,687 | |
| 33 | 0603225D8Z | JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 18,873 | 18,873 | |
| 34 | 0603286E | ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS | 230,978 | 210,978 | |
| OpFires lack of transition pathway | [–20,000] | ||||
| 35 | 0603287E | SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY | 158,439 | 158,439 | |
| 36 | 0603288D8Z | ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS | 23,775 | 23,775 | |
| 37 | 0603289D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS | 36,524 | 36,524 | |
| 38 | 0603291D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS—MHA | 14,703 | 14,703 | |
| 39 | 0603294C | COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY | 11,058 | 11,058 | |
| 40 | 0603338D8Z | DEFENSE MODERNIZATION AND PROTOTYPING | 133,375 | 126,375 | |
| Lack of hypersonic prototype coordination efforts | [–20,000] | ||||
| Stratospheric balloon research | [13,000] | ||||
| 42 | 0603342D8Z | DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) | 26,141 | 26,141 | |
| 43 | 0603375D8Z | TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION | 27,709 | 27,709 | |
| 44 | 0603384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 188,001 | 188,001 | |
| 45 | 0603527D8Z | RETRACT LARCH | 130,283 | 130,283 | |
| 46 | 0603618D8Z | JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 15,164 | 15,164 | |
| 47 | 0603648D8Z | JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 85,452 | 85,452 | |
| 48 | 0603662D8Z | NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES | 5,882 | 5,882 | |
| 49 | 0603680D8Z | DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 93,817 | 98,817 | |
| Rapid prototyping using digital manufacturing | [5,000] | ||||
| 50 | 0603680S | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 40,025 | 55,025 | |
| Defense supply chain technologies | [5,000] | ||||
| Steel performance initiative | [10,000] | ||||
| 52 | 0603712S | GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 10,235 | 10,235 | |
| 53 | 0603716D8Z | STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM | 53,862 | 53,862 | |
| 54 | 0603720S | MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT | 124,049 | 124,049 | |
| 55 | 0603727D8Z | JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM | 3,871 | 3,871 | |
| 56 | 0603739E | ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES | 95,864 | 95,864 | |
| 57 | 0603760E | COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 221,724 | 221,724 | |
| 58 | 0603766E | NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY | 661,158 | 651,158 | |
| Lack of coordination | [–10,000] | ||||
| 59 | 0603767E | SENSOR TECHNOLOGY | 200,220 | 200,220 | |
| 60 | 0603769D8Z | DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 6,765 | 6,765 | |
| 61 | 0603781D8Z | SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE | 12,598 | 12,598 | |
| 64 | 0603924D8Z | HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 105,410 | 105,410 | |
| 65 | 0603941D8Z | TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 187,065 | 187,065 | |
| 67 | 0604055D8Z | OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT | 0 | 65,000 | |
| Restoration of funds | [65,000] | ||||
| 70 | 1160402BB | SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 89,072 | 89,072 | |
| 71 | 1206310SDA | SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 72,422 | 72,422 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 3,588,876 | 3,636,876 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 72 | 0603161D8Z | NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P | 32,636 | 32,636 | |
| 73 | 0603600D8Z | WALKOFF | 106,529 | 106,529 | |
| 75 | 0603851D8Z | ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM | 61,345 | 76,345 | |
| Joint Storage Program | [15,000] | ||||
| 76 | 0603881C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT | 412,627 | 412,627 | |
| 77 | 0603882C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT | 1,004,305 | 1,004,305 | |
| 78 | 0603884BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL | 76,167 | 76,167 | |
| 79 | 0603884C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS | 281,957 | 281,957 | |
| 80 | 0603890C | BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS | 599,380 | 599,380 | |
| 81 | 0603891C | SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA | 420,216 | 420,216 | |
| 82 | 0603892C | AEGIS BMD | 814,936 | 814,936 | |
| 83 | 0603896C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI | 593,353 | 593,353 | |
| 84 | 0603898C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT | 49,560 | 49,560 | |
| 85 | 0603904C | MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) | 55,356 | 55,356 | |
| 86 | 0603906C | REGARDING TRENCH | 11,863 | 11,863 | |
| 87 | 0603907C | SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) | 118,318 | 118,318 | |
| 88 | 0603913C | ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS | 300,000 | 300,000 | |
| 89 | 0603914C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST | 378,302 | 378,302 | |
| 90 | 0603915C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS | 536,133 | 536,133 | |
| 92 | 0603923D8Z | COALITION WARFARE | 10,129 | 10,129 | |
| 93 | 0604011D8Z | NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (5G) | 449,000 | 449,000 | |
| 94 | 0604016D8Z | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM | 3,325 | 3,325 | |
| 95 | 0604115C | TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES | 67,389 | 67,389 | |
| 98 | 0604181C | HYPERSONIC DEFENSE | 206,832 | 206,832 | |
| 99 | 0604250D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES | 730,508 | 630,508 | |
| Program decrease | [–100,000] | ||||
| 100 | 0604294D8Z | TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS | 489,076 | 489,076 | |
| 101 | 0604331D8Z | RAPID PROTOTYPING PROGRAM | 102,023 | 82,023 | |
| Lack of hypersonic prototype coordination efforts | [–20,000] | ||||
| 102 | 0604341D8Z | DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) PROTOTYPING | 13,255 | 13,255 | |
| 103 | 0604400D8Z | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED SYSTEM COMMON DEVELOPMENT | 2,787 | 2,787 | |
| 105 | 0604672C | HOMELAND DEFENSE RADAR—HAWAII (HDR-H) | 0 | 162,000 | |
| Continue radar development | [162,000] | ||||
| 107 | 0604682D8Z | WARGAMING AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SSA) | 3,469 | 3,469 | |
| 109 | 0604826J | JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSMENTS | 19,190 | 19,190 | |
| 110 | 0604873C | LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR (LRDR) | 137,256 | 137,256 | |
| 111 | 0604874C | IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS | 664,138 | 354,138 | |
| Contract award delay | [–310,000] | ||||
| 112 | 0604876C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST | 7,768 | 7,768 | |
| 113 | 0604878C | AEGIS BMD TEST | 170,880 | 170,880 | |
| 114 | 0604879C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST | 76,456 | 76,456 | |
| 115 | 0604880C | LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) | 56,628 | 133,428 | |
| PDI: Guam Defense System—systems engineering | [76,800] | ||||
| 116 | 0604887C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE SEGMENT TEST | 67,071 | 67,071 | |
| 118 | 0300206R | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS | 2,198 | 2,198 | |
| 119 | 0303191D8Z | JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM | 997 | 997 | |
| 120 | 0305103C | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 1,148 | 1,148 | |
| 121 | 1206410SDA | SPACE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPING | 215,994 | 325,994 | |
| Execution of HBTSS by MDA | [–20,000] | ||||
| Space-based target custody layer | [130,000] | ||||
| 122 | 1206893C | SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 34,144 | 34,144 | |
| 123 | 1206895C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS | 32,068 | 152,068 | |
| Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor (HBTSS) | [120,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 9,416,712 | 9,470,512 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 124 | 0604161D8Z | NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD | 7,173 | 7,173 | |
| 126 | 0604384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD | 319,976 | 322,976 | |
| Stryker NBCRV sensor suite upgrade | [3,000] | ||||
| 127 | 0604771D8Z | JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) | 54,985 | 54,985 | |
| 128 | 0605000BR | COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 15,650 | 15,650 | |
| 129 | 0605013BL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 1,441 | 1,441 | |
| 130 | 0605021SE | HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE | 7,287 | 7,287 | |
| 131 | 0605022D8Z | DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM | 12,928 | 12,928 | |
| 132 | 0605027D8Z | OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES | 10,259 | 10,259 | |
| 133 | 0605070S | DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 1,377 | 1,377 | |
| 134 | 0605075D8Z | CMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION | 1,648 | 1,648 | |
| 135 | 0605080S | DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM | 20,537 | 20,537 | |
| 136 | 0605090S | DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS) | 1,638 | 1,638 | |
| 137 | 0605141BR | MISSION ASSURANCE RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (MARMS) | 5,500 | 5,500 | |
| 138 | 0605210D8Z | DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES | 8,279 | 8,279 | |
| 139 | 0605294D8Z | TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS | 107,585 | 107,585 | |
| 140 | 0605772D8Z | NUCLEAR COMMAND, CONTROL, & COMMUNICATIONS | 3,685 | 3,685 | |
| 143 | 0305304D8Z | DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) | 3,275 | 3,275 | |
| 144 | 0305310D8Z | CWMD SYSTEMS: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 20,585 | 20,585 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 603,808 | 606,808 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 145 | 0603829J | JOINT CAPABILITY EXPERIMENTATION | 11,239 | 11,239 | |
| 146 | 0604774D8Z | DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) | 9,793 | 9,793 | |
| 147 | 0604875D8Z | JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT | 8,497 | 8,497 | |
| 148 | 0604940D8Z | CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) | 422,451 | 452,451 | |
| Joint Counter-UAS Office assessment infrastructure | [15,000] | ||||
| Telemetry range extension wave glider relay | [15,000] | ||||
| 149 | 0604942D8Z | ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS | 18,379 | 18,379 | |
| 150 | 0605001E | MISSION SUPPORT | 74,334 | 74,334 | |
| 151 | 0605100D8Z | JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) | 79,046 | 79,046 | |
| 153 | 0605126J | JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) | 50,255 | 50,255 | |
| 155 | 0605142D8Z | SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 49,376 | 49,376 | |
| 156 | 0605151D8Z | STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD | 5,777 | 7,777 | |
| National Academies of Science study on comparison of talent programs | [2,000] | ||||
| 157 | 0605161D8Z | NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY | 16,552 | 16,552 | |
| 158 | 0605170D8Z | SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION | 9,582 | 9,582 | |
| 159 | 0605200D8Z | GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) | 1,940 | 1,940 | |
| 160 | 0605384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 122,951 | 122,951 | |
| 167 | 0605790D8Z | SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 3,582 | 3,582 | |
| 168 | 0605797D8Z | MAINTAINING TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGE | 29,566 | 29,566 | |
| 169 | 0605798D8Z | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS | 29,059 | 29,059 | |
| 170 | 0605801KA | DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) | 59,369 | 9,369 | |
| Insufficient progress on data sharing and open repositories | [–50,000] | ||||
| 171 | 0605803SE | R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION | 29,420 | 29,420 | |
| 172 | 0605804D8Z | DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION | 27,198 | 27,198 | |
| 173 | 0605898E | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 13,434 | 13,434 | |
| 174 | 0605998KA | MANAGEMENT HQ—DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) | 2,837 | 2,837 | |
| 175 | 0606100D8Z | BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS | 13,173 | 13,173 | |
| 176 | 0606225D8Z | ODNA TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS | 3,200 | 3,200 | |
| 177 | 0606589D8W | DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE (DDS) DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT | 999 | 999 | |
| 180 | 0203345D8Z | DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) | 3,099 | 3,099 | |
| 181 | 0204571J | JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT | 3,058 | 3,058 | |
| 182 | 0208045K | C4I INTEROPERABILITY | 59,813 | 59,813 | |
| 185 | 0303140SE | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 1,112 | 1,112 | |
| 186 | 0303166J | SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES | 545 | 545 | |
| 187 | 0303260D8Z | DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO) | 1,036 | 1,036 | |
| 188 | 0305172K | COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS | 30,824 | 30,824 | |
| 190 | 0305208K | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 3,048 | 3,048 | |
| 194 | 0804768J | COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)—NON-MHA | 31,125 | 31,125 | |
| 195 | 0808709SE | DEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (DEOMI) | 100 | 100 | |
| 196 | 0901598C | MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA | 26,902 | 26,902 | |
| 197 | 0903235K | JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER (JSP) | 3,138 | 3,138 | |
| 999 | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 41,583 | 41,583 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,297,392 | 1,279,392 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 199 | 0604130V | ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) | 14,378 | 14,378 | |
| 200 | 0604532K | JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 132,058 | 132,058 | |
| 201 | 0605127T | REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA | 1,986 | 1,986 | |
| 202 | 0605147T | OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS) | 316 | 316 | |
| 203 | 0607210D8Z | INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT | 9,151 | 70,151 | |
| Advanced machine tool research | [20,000] | ||||
| Cold spray manufacturing technologies | [5,000] | ||||
| Domestic organic LED manufacturing | [5,000] | ||||
| Implementation of radar supplier resiliency plan | [5,000] | ||||
| Manufacturing for reuse of NdFeB magnets | [6,000] | ||||
| Submarine industrial base workforce training pipeline | [20,000] | ||||
| 204 | 0607310D8Z | CWMD SYSTEMS: OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 19,082 | 19,082 | |
| 205 | 0607327T | GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS) | 3,992 | 3,992 | |
| 206 | 0607384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) | 39,530 | 39,530 | |
| 207 | 0208043J | PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) | 3,039 | 3,039 | |
| 212 | 0302019K | DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION | 16,324 | 16,324 | |
| 213 | 0303126K | LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS | 11,884 | 11,884 | |
| 214 | 0303131K | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) | 5,560 | 5,560 | |
| 215 | 0303136G | KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) | 73,356 | 73,356 | |
| 216 | 0303140D8Z | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 46,577 | 66,577 | |
| Workforce transformation cyber initiative pilot program | [20,000] | ||||
| 217 | 0303140G | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 356,713 | 356,713 | |
| 218 | 0303140K | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 8,922 | 18,922 | |
| Execution of orchestration pilot | [10,000] | ||||
| 219 | 0303150K | GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 3,695 | 3,695 | |
| 220 | 0303153K | DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION | 20,113 | 20,113 | |
| 223 | 0303228K | JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) | 9,728 | 9,242 | |
| JRSS SIPR funding | [–486] | ||||
| 231 | 0305128V | SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES | 5,700 | 5,700 | |
| 235 | 0305186D8Z | POLICY R&D PROGRAMS | 7,144 | 7,144 | |
| 236 | 0305199D8Z | NET CENTRICITY | 21,793 | 21,793 | |
| 238 | 0305208BB | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 6,066 | 6,066 | |
| 245 | 0305387D8Z | HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM | 2,190 | 2,190 | |
| 252 | 0708012K | LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 1,654 | 1,654 | |
| 253 | 0708012S | PACIFIC DISASTER CENTERS | 1,785 | 1,785 | |
| 254 | 0708047S | DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM | 7,301 | 7,301 | |
| 256 | 1105219BB | MQ–9 UAV | 21,265 | 21,265 | |
| 258 | 1160403BB | AVIATION SYSTEMS | 230,812 | 230,812 | |
| 259 | 1160405BB | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 19,558 | 19,558 | |
| 260 | 1160408BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 136,041 | 136,041 | |
| 261 | 1160431BB | WARRIOR SYSTEMS | 59,511 | 58,311 | |
| MMP-Light unexecutable, transfer to man-pack | [–1,200] | ||||
| 262 | 1160432BB | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 10,500 | 10,500 | |
| 263 | 1160434BB | UNMANNED ISR | 19,154 | 19,154 | |
| 264 | 1160480BB | SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES | 9,263 | 9,263 | |
| 265 | 1160483BB | MARITIME SYSTEMS | 59,882 | 59,882 | |
| 266 | 1160489BB | GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES | 4,606 | 4,606 | |
| 267 | 1160490BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 11,612 | 11,612 | |
| 268 | 1203610K | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 3,239 | 3,239 | |
| 999 | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 4,746,466 | 4,746,466 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 6,161,946 | 6,251,260 | |||
| SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | |||||
| 269 | 0608197V | NATIONAL BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SERVICES—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM | 121,676 | 121,676 | |
| 270 | 0608648D8Z | ACQUISITION VISIBILITY—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM | 16,848 | 16,848 | |
| 271 | 0303150K | GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 86,750 | 86,750 | |
| 272 | 0308588D8Z | ALGORITHMIC WARFARE CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS—SOFTWARE PILOT PROGRAM | 250,107 | 250,107 | |
| SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | 475,381 | 475,381 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 24,280,891 | 24,546,005 | |||
| OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE | |||||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 1 | 0605118OTE | OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION | 100,021 | 100,021 | |
| 2 | 0605131OTE | LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION | 70,933 | 70,933 | |
| 3 | 0605814OTE | OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES | 39,136 | 66,136 | |
| Advanced satellite navigation receiver | [5,000] | ||||
| Joint Test and Evaluation DWR funding restoration | [22,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 210,090 | 237,090 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE | 210,090 | 237,090 | |||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 106,224,793 | 106,660,645 | |||
| SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 16 | 0602145A | NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY | 2,000 | 2,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 2,000 | 2,000 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 80 | 0603327A | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 500 | 500 | |
| 114 | 0604785A | INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4) | 2,020 | 2,020 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 2,520 | 2,520 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 131 | 0604741A | AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV | 27,000 | 27,000 | |
| 159 | 0605035A | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 2,300 | 2,300 | |
| 166 | 0605051A | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 64,625 | 64,625 | |
| 183 | 0304270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 3,900 | 3,900 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 97,825 | 97,825 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 198 | 0605709A | EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS | 1,000 | 1,000 | |
| 209 | 0606003A | COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION | 4,137 | 4,137 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 5,137 | 5,137 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 239 | 0203802A | OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 2,300 | 2,300 | |
| 248 | 0303028A | SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 23,367 | 23,367 | |
| 257 | 0305204A | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 34,100 | 34,100 | |
| 258 | 0305206A | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 15,575 | 15,575 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 75,342 | 75,342 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 182,824 | 182,824 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 39 | 0603527N | RETRACT LARCH | 36,500 | 36,500 | |
| 58 | 0603654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 14,461 | 14,461 | |
| 63 | 0603734N | CHALK CORAL | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| 71 | 0603795N | LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY | 1,457 | 1,457 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 55,418 | 55,418 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 142 | 0604755N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) | 1,144 | 1,144 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 1,144 | 1,144 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 229 | 0206625M | USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 3,000 | 3,000 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 59,562 | 59,562 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 65 | 0305601F | MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENTS | 6,500 | ||
| EDI: Mission Partner Environment (MPE) | [6,500] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 6,500 | ||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 185 | 0205671F | JOINT COUNTER RCIED ELECTRONIC WARFARE | 4,080 | 4,080 | |
| 228 | 0208288F | INTEL DATA APPLICATIONS | 1,224 | 1,224 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 5,304 | 5,304 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | 5,304 | 11,804 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 10 | 0602134BR | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT ADVANCED STUDIES | 3,699 | 3,699 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 3,699 | 3,699 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 26 | 0603122D8Z | COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 19,288 | 19,288 | |
| 28 | 0603134BR | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT SIMULATION | 3,861 | 3,861 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 23,149 | 23,149 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 97 | 0604134BR | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT DEMONSTRATION, PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING | 19,931 | 19,931 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 19,931 | 19,931 | |||
| 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 24,057 | 24,057 | ||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 260 | 1160408BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 1,186 | 1,186 | |
| 261 | 1160431BB | WARRIOR SYSTEMS | 5,796 | 5,796 | |
| 263 | 1160434BB | UNMANNED ISR | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 36,039 | 36,039 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 82,818 | 82,818 | |||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 330,508 | 337,008 | |||
| SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 159,834 | 159,834 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 663,751 | 663,751 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 956,477 | 956,477 | |
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,157,635 | 1,167,935 | |
| Joint Counter-UAS IOC acceleration | [10,300] | |||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 1,453,024 | 1,453,024 | |
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 4,713,660 | 4,713,660 | |
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 404,161 | 404,161 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,413,359 | 1,413,359 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 8,220,093 | 8,346,093 | |
| Child Development Center playground equipment and furniture increases | [79,000] | |||
| Child Youth Service improvements | [47,000] | |||
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 3,581,071 | 3,815,531 | |
| FSRM increase | [62,360] | |||
| MDTF EUCOM and INDOPACOM FSRM | [126,800] | |||
| Revitalization of Army deployment infrastructure | [45,300] | |||
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 411,844 | 411,844 | |
| 160 | US AFRICA COMMAND | 239,387 | 341,887 | |
| AFRICOM force protection upgrades | [2,500] | |||
| AFRICOM ISR improvements | [64,000] | |||
| AFRICOM UFR CASEVAC improvements | [36,000] | |||
| 170 | US EUROPEAN COMMAND | 160,761 | 160,761 | |
| 180 | US SOUTHERN COMMAND | 197,826 | 197,826 | |
| 190 | US FORCES KOREA | 65,152 | 65,152 | |
| 200 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 430,109 | 435,109 | |
| Additional access and operations support | [5,000] | |||
| 210 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY | 464,117 | 464,117 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 24,692,261 | 25,170,521 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 220 | STRATEGIC MOBILITY | 402,236 | 402,236 | |
| 230 | ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS | 324,306 | 324,306 | |
| 240 | INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | 3,653 | 3,653 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 730,195 | 730,195 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 250 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 165,142 | 165,142 | |
| 260 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 76,509 | 76,509 | |
| 270 | ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING | 88,523 | 88,523 | |
| 280 | SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS | 535,578 | 535,578 | |
| 290 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 981,436 | 981,436 | |
| 300 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 1,204,768 | 1,204,768 | |
| 310 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 215,195 | 215,195 | |
| 320 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 575,232 | 575,232 | |
| 330 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 722,612 | 722,612 | |
| 340 | EXAMINING | 185,522 | 185,522 | |
| 350 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 221,503 | 221,503 | |
| 360 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 154,651 | 154,651 | |
| 370 | JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS | 173,286 | 173,286 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 5,299,957 | 5,299,957 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 390 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 491,926 | 466,926 | |
| Historical underexecution | [–25,000] | |||
| 400 | CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES | 812,613 | 812,613 | |
| 410 | LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 676,178 | 676,178 | |
| 420 | AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT | 437,774 | 437,774 | |
| 430 | ADMINISTRATION | 438,048 | 438,048 | |
| 440 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 1,638,872 | 1,638,872 | |
| 450 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 300,046 | 300,046 | |
| 460 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 701,103 | 700,103 | |
| Historical underexecution | [–4,000] | |||
| Servicewomen's commemorative partnerships | [3,000] | |||
| 470 | OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT | 1,887,133 | 1,887,133 | |
| 480 | ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES | 195,291 | 195,291 | |
| 490 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 229,537 | 229,537 | |
| 500 | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS | 306,370 | 306,370 | |
| 510 | INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS | 373,030 | 373,030 | |
| 520 | MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS | 32,719 | 32,719 | |
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,069,915 | 1,069,915 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 9,590,555 | 9,564,555 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –458,901 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–185,801] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–135,400] | |||
| Foreign currency adjustments | [–137,700] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –458,901 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 40,312,968 | 40,306,327 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 10,784 | 10,784 | |
| 020 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 530,425 | 530,425 | |
| 030 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 123,737 | 123,737 | |
| 040 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 589,582 | 589,582 | |
| 050 | AVIATION ASSETS | 89,332 | 89,332 | |
| 060 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 387,545 | 387,545 | |
| 070 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 97,569 | 97,569 | |
| 080 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 43,148 | 43,148 | |
| 090 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 587,098 | 587,098 | |
| 100 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 327,180 | 332,440 | |
| FSRM increase | [5,260] | |||
| 110 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 28,783 | 28,783 | |
| 120 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 2,745 | 2,745 | |
| 130 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY | 7,438 | 7,438 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,825,366 | 2,830,626 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 140 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 15,530 | 15,530 | |
| 150 | ADMINISTRATION | 17,761 | 17,761 | |
| 160 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 14,256 | 14,256 | |
| 170 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 6,564 | 6,564 | |
| 180 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 55,240 | 55,240 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 109,351 | 109,351 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –16,699 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–11,999] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–4,700] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –16,699 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 2,934,717 | 2,923,278 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 769,449 | 769,449 | |
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 204,604 | 204,604 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 812,072 | 812,072 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 103,650 | 103,650 | |
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 32,485 | 32,485 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 1,011,142 | 1,011,142 | |
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 712,881 | 712,881 | |
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 47,732 | 47,732 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 265,408 | 265,408 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,106,704 | 1,106,704 | |
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 876,032 | 887,252 | |
| FSRM increase | [11,220] | |||
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 1,050,257 | 1,050,257 | |
| 130 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 7,998 | 10,998 | |
| Pilot program for National Guard cybersecurity | [3,000] | |||
| 140 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY | 7,756 | 7,756 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 7,008,170 | 7,022,390 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 150 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 8,018 | 8,018 | |
| 160 | ADMINISTRATION | 74,309 | 74,309 | |
| 170 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 66,140 | 66,140 | |
| 180 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 9,087 | 9,087 | |
| 190 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 251,714 | 251,714 | |
| 200 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 2,576 | 2,576 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 411,844 | 411,844 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –74,172 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–36,372] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–37,800] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –74,172 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 7,420,014 | 7,360,062 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 5,738,746 | 5,738,746 | |
| 020 | FLEET AIR TRAINING | 2,213,673 | 2,213,673 | |
| 030 | AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES | 57,144 | 57,144 | |
| 040 | AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT | 171,949 | 171,949 | |
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 838,767 | 838,767 | |
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,459,447 | 1,459,447 | |
| 070 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 57,789 | 57,789 | |
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 1,264,665 | 1,264,665 | |
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 1,117,067 | 1,117,067 | |
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 7,859,104 | 7,859,104 | |
| 120 | SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 2,262,196 | 2,262,196 | |
| 130 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE | 1,521,360 | 1,521,360 | |
| 140 | SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE | 274,087 | 274,087 | |
| 150 | WARFARE TACTICS | 741,609 | 741,609 | |
| 160 | OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 401,382 | 401,382 | |
| 170 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 1,546,273 | 1,546,273 | |
| 180 | EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 177,951 | 177,951 | |
| 190 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS | 61,484 | 66,484 | |
| PDI: Asia-Pacific Regional Initiative | [5,000] | |||
| 200 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 102,330 | 110,630 | |
| PDI: Joint Task Force Indo-Pacific (SOCPAC) | [6,300] | |||
| PDI: Singapore CTIF fusion center | [2,000] | |||
| 210 | MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 8,810 | 26,510 | |
| PDI: Countering Chinese malign influence in Indo-Pacific | [17,700] | |||
| 220 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 567,496 | 567,496 | |
| 230 | FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE | 1,428,102 | 1,428,102 | |
| 240 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 995,762 | 995,762 | |
| 250 | OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 524,008 | 524,008 | |
| 260 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | 1,229,056 | 1,229,056 | |
| 270 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 3,453,099 | 3,453,099 | |
| 280 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 4,627,966 | 4,627,966 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 40,701,322 | 40,732,322 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 290 | SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE | 849,993 | 849,993 | |
| 300 | READY RESERVE FORCE | 436,029 | 436,029 | |
| 310 | SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS | 286,416 | 286,416 | |
| 320 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 99,402 | 111,002 | |
| USNS Mercy SLEP | [11,600] | |||
| 330 | COAST GUARD SUPPORT | 25,235 | 25,235 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 1,697,075 | 1,708,675 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 340 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 186,117 | 186,117 | |
| 350 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 13,206 | 13,206 | |
| 360 | RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS | 163,683 | 163,683 | |
| 370 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 947,841 | 947,841 | |
| 380 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 367,647 | 367,647 | |
| 390 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 254,928 | 254,928 | |
| 400 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 206,305 | 206,305 | |
| 410 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 103,799 | 103,799 | |
| 420 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 66,060 | 66,060 | |
| 430 | JUNIOR ROTC | 56,276 | 56,276 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 2,365,862 | 2,365,862 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 440 | ADMINISTRATION | 1,249,410 | 1,249,410 | |
| 450 | CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 189,625 | 189,625 | |
| 460 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 499,904 | 499,904 | |
| 470 | MEDICAL ACTIVITIES | 196,747 | 196,747 | |
| 480 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 165,708 | 165,708 | |
| 500 | PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAM SUPPORT | 519,716 | 524,716 | |
| Energy Security Programs Office | [5,000] | |||
| 510 | ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT | 751,184 | 751,184 | |
| 520 | INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES | 747,519 | 747,519 | |
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 608,670 | 608,670 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 4,928,483 | 4,933,483 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –629,787 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–54,987] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–526,100] | |||
| Foreign currency adjustments | [–48,700] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –629,787 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 49,692,742 | 49,110,555 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 941,143 | 941,143 | |
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 1,277,798 | 1,277,798 | |
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 206,907 | 206,907 | |
| 040 | MARITIME PREPOSITIONING | 103,614 | 103,614 | |
| 050 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 215,974 | 215,974 | |
| 060 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 938,063 | 938,063 | |
| 070 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 2,264,680 | 2,264,680 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 5,948,179 | 5,948,179 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 080 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 20,751 | 20,751 | |
| 090 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 1,193 | 1,193 | |
| 100 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 110,149 | 110,149 | |
| 110 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 69,509 | 69,509 | |
| 120 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 412,613 | 412,613 | |
| 130 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 215,464 | 215,464 | |
| 140 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 33,719 | 33,719 | |
| 150 | JUNIOR ROTC | 25,784 | 25,784 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 889,182 | 889,182 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 160 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 32,005 | 32,005 | |
| 170 | ADMINISTRATION | 399,363 | 399,363 | |
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 59,878 | 59,878 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 491,246 | 491,246 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –28,257 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–7,457] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–7,300] | |||
| Foreign currency adjustments | [–13,500] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –28,257 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 7,328,607 | 7,300,350 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 635,070 | 635,070 | |
| 020 | INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE | 8,713 | 8,713 | |
| 030 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 105,088 | 105,088 | |
| 040 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 398 | 398 | |
| 050 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 27,284 | 27,284 | |
| 070 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | 17,894 | 17,894 | |
| 080 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 132,862 | 132,862 | |
| 090 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 453 | 453 | |
| 100 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | 26,073 | 26,073 | |
| 110 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 48,762 | 48,762 | |
| 120 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 103,580 | 103,580 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 1,106,177 | 1,106,177 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 130 | ADMINISTRATION | 1,927 | 1,927 | |
| 140 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 15,895 | 15,895 | |
| 150 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 3,047 | 3,047 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 20,869 | 20,869 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –30,938 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–6,438] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–24,500] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –30,938 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 1,127,046 | 1,096,108 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATING FORCES | 104,616 | 104,616 | |
| 020 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 17,053 | 17,053 | |
| 030 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 41,412 | 41,412 | |
| 040 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 107,773 | 107,773 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 270,854 | 270,854 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 050 | ADMINISTRATION | 13,802 | 13,802 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 13,802 | 13,802 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –1,246 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–1,046] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–200] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –1,246 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 284,656 | 283,410 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 731,511 | 733,211 | |
| Premature reduction of A–10 squadrons | [1,700] | |||
| 020 | COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES | 1,275,485 | 1,275,485 | |
| 030 | AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) | 1,437,095 | 1,449,495 | |
| Premature reduction of A–10 squadrons | [12,400] | |||
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 3,241,216 | 3,343,016 | |
| FSRM increase | [101,800] | |||
| 060 | CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT | 235,816 | 235,816 | |
| 070 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 1,508,342 | 1,477,897 | |
| Transfer to OCO | [–30,445] | |||
| 080 | FLYING HOUR PROGRAM | 4,458,457 | 4,564,157 | |
| KC–10 tanker divestment reversal | [16,200] | |||
| KC–135 tanker divestment reversal | [36,600] | |||
| Premature reduction of A–10 squadrons | [52,900] | |||
| 090 | BASE SUPPORT | 7,497,288 | 7,497,288 | |
| 100 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 849,842 | 880,642 | |
| PDI: Mission Partner Environment implementation | [30,800] | |||
| 110 | OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS | 1,067,055 | 1,067,055 | |
| 120 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 698,579 | 698,579 | |
| 150 | SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 34,194 | 34,194 | |
| 160 | US NORTHCOM/NORAD | 204,268 | 204,268 | |
| 170 | US STRATCOM | 526,809 | 526,809 | |
| 180 | US CYBERCOM | 314,524 | 356,224 | |
| Additional access and operations support | [25,000] | |||
| Hunt Forward missions | [13,800] | |||
| Secure the DODIN | [2,900] | |||
| 190 | US CENTCOM | 186,116 | 186,116 | |
| 200 | US SOCOM | 9,881 | 9,881 | |
| 210 | US TRANSCOM | 1,046 | 1,046 | |
| 230 | USSPACECOM | 249,022 | 249,022 | |
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,289,339 | 1,289,339 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 25,815,885 | 26,079,540 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 240 | AIRLIFT OPERATIONS | 1,350,031 | 1,350,031 | |
| 250 | MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS | 647,168 | 647,168 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 1,997,199 | 1,997,199 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 260 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 142,548 | 142,548 | |
| 270 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 25,720 | 25,720 | |
| 280 | RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) | 128,295 | 128,295 | |
| 290 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 417,335 | 417,335 | |
| 300 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 615,033 | 615,033 | |
| 310 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 298,795 | 298,795 | |
| 320 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 85,844 | 85,844 | |
| 330 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 155,065 | 135,065 | |
| Ahead of need | [–20,000] | |||
| 340 | EXAMINING | 4,474 | 4,474 | |
| 350 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 219,349 | 219,349 | |
| 360 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 361,570 | 361,570 | |
| 370 | JUNIOR ROTC | 72,126 | 72,126 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 2,526,154 | 2,506,154 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 380 | LOGISTICS OPERATIONS | 672,426 | 672,426 | |
| 390 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 145,130 | 145,130 | |
| 400 | ADMINISTRATION | 851,251 | 851,251 | |
| 410 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 28,554 | 28,554 | |
| 420 | OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 1,188,414 | 1,188,414 | |
| 430 | CIVIL AIR PATROL | 28,772 | 28,772 | |
| 450 | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 158,803 | 158,803 | |
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,338,009 | 1,338,009 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 4,411,359 | 4,411,359 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –765,956 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–89,856] | |||
| COVID-related throughput carryover adjustment | [–75,800] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–560,200] | |||
| Foreign currency adjustments | [–40,100] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –765,956 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 34,750,597 | 34,228,296 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | GLOBAL C3I & EARLY WARNING | 276,109 | 276,109 | |
| 030 | SPACE LAUNCH OPERATIONS | 177,056 | 177,056 | |
| 040 | SPACE OPERATIONS | 475,338 | 475,338 | |
| 050 | EDUCATION & TRAINING | 18,660 | 18,660 | |
| 060 | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 137,315 | 137,315 | |
| 070 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 250,324 | 250,324 | |
| 080 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS & SYSTEM SUPPORT | 1,063,969 | 1,063,969 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,398,771 | 2,398,771 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE WIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 090 | ADMINISTRATION | 132,523 | 132,523 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE WIDE ACTIVITIES | 132,523 | 132,523 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –400 | |
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–400] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –400 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE | 2,531,294 | 2,530,894 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 1,782,016 | 1,782,016 | |
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 215,209 | 215,209 | |
| 030 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 453,896 | 509,096 | |
| KC–10 tanker divestment reversal | [48,400] | |||
| KC–135 tanker divestment reversal | [3,400] | |||
| Premature reduction of A–10 squadrons | [3,400] | |||
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 103,414 | 107,614 | |
| FSRM increase | [4,200] | |||
| 050 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 224,977 | 224,977 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 452,468 | 452,468 | |
| 070 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 2,259 | 2,259 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 3,234,239 | 3,293,639 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 080 | ADMINISTRATION | 74,258 | 74,258 | |
| 090 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 23,121 | 18,121 | |
| Ahead of need | [–5,000] | |||
| 100 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) | 12,006 | 12,006 | |
| 110 | OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) | 6,165 | 6,165 | |
| 120 | AUDIOVISUAL | 495 | 495 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 116,045 | 111,045 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –73,163 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–10,863] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–62,300] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –73,163 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 3,350,284 | 3,331,521 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS | 2,476,205 | 2,476,205 | |
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 611,325 | 611,325 | |
| 030 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 1,138,919 | 1,138,919 | |
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 323,605 | 332,505 | |
| FSRM increase | [8,900] | |||
| 050 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 1,100,828 | 1,100,828 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 962,438 | 962,438 | |
| 070 | CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT | 27,028 | 27,028 | |
| 080 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 16,380 | 19,380 | |
| Pilot program for National Guard cybersecurity | [3,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 6,656,728 | 6,668,628 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 090 | ADMINISTRATION | 48,218 | 48,218 | |
| 100 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 48,696 | 33,696 | |
| Ahead of need | [–15,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | 96,914 | 81,914 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –122,052 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–15,852] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–106,200] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –122,052 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 6,753,642 | 6,628,490 | ||
| OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 439,111 | 439,111 | |
| 020 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CE2T2 | 535,728 | 535,728 | |
| 030 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CYBER | 24,728 | 24,728 | |
| 040 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES | 1,069,971 | 1,072,971 | |
| SOCOM Syria exfiltration reconsitution | [3,000] | |||
| 050 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 9,800 | 9,800 | |
| 060 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE | 561,907 | 561,907 | |
| 070 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE | 685,097 | 707,097 | |
| Airborne ISR restoration | [22,000] | |||
| 080 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 158,971 | 158,971 | |
| 090 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT | 1,062,748 | 1,062,748 | |
| 100 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES | 2,598,385 | 2,599,685 | |
| Airborne ISR restoration | [1,300] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 7,146,446 | 7,172,746 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 120 | DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY | 162,963 | 162,963 | |
| 130 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 95,684 | 95,684 | |
| 140 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 33,301 | 33,301 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 291,948 | 291,948 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 160 | CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS | 147,993 | 179,893 | |
| Innovative Readiness Training | [16,900] | |||
| STARBASE | [15,000] | |||
| 180 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY | 604,835 | 604,835 | |
| 190 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY—CYBER | 3,282 | 3,282 | |
| 210 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY | 1,370,681 | 1,427,081 | |
| DWR restore activities | [56,400] | |||
| 220 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY—CYBER | 22,532 | 22,532 | |
| 230 | DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY | 949,008 | 952,008 | |
| DWR restore: Congressional oversight | [3,000] | |||
| 250 | DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY—CYBER | 9,577 | 9,577 | |
| 260 | DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY | 799,952 | 799,952 | |
| 270 | DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY—CYBER | 20,806 | 20,806 | |
| 280 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 1,883,190 | 1,923,190 | |
| Secure the DODIN | [40,000] | |||
| 290 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER | 582,639 | 577,939 | |
| JRSS SIPR funding | [–4,700] | |||
| 330 | DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY | 37,637 | 37,637 | |
| 340 | DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY | 382,084 | 385,684 | |
| DWR restore: blankets for homeless | [3,600] | |||
| 350 | DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY | 196,997 | 196,997 | |
| 360 | DEFENSE PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING AGENCY | 129,225 | 129,225 | |
| 370 | DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 598,559 | 598,559 | |
| Defense Institute for International Legal Studies | [2,000] | |||
| Institute for Security Governance | [–2,000] | |||
| PDI: Maritime Security Initiative INDOPACOM UFR | [163,000] | |||
| PDI: Transfer from Sec. 333 to Maritime Security Initiative | [–163,000] | |||
| 400 | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | 38,432 | 38,432 | |
| 410 | DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | 591,780 | 591,780 | |
| 430 | DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY—CYBER | 24,635 | 24,635 | |
| 440 | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY | 2,941,429 | 3,012,929 | |
| DWR restore: maintain student-teacher ratios in DODEA schools | [1,500] | |||
| Impact Aid for children with severe disabilities | [20,000] | |||
| Impact Aid for schools with military dependent students | [50,000] | |||
| 450 | MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | 505,858 | 505,858 | |
| 480 | OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT | 40,272 | 90,272 | |
| Defense Community Infrastruture Program infusion | [50,000] | |||
| 490 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 1,540,446 | 1,613,946 | |
| AI National Security Commission | [2,500] | |||
| Bien Hoa dioxin cleanup | [15,000] | |||
| Black Start ERREs | [2,000] | |||
| CDC PFAS health assessment | [10,000] | |||
| Commission on Confederate symbols and displays | [2,000] | |||
| Cooperative program for Vietnam personnel MIA | [2,000] | |||
| DWR restore: Congressional background investigations | [–3,000] | |||
| Energy performance contracts | [10,000] | |||
| ESOH personnel in ASD(S) | [2,000] | |||
| FY20 NDAA Sec. 575 interstate spousal licensing | [4,000] | |||
| National Cyber Director independent study | [2,000] | |||
| REPI | [25,000] | |||
| 500 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE—CYBER | 51,630 | 51,630 | |
| 510 | SPACE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY | 48,166 | 48,166 | |
| 530 | WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES | 340,291 | 343,291 | |
| DWR restore: support to commissions | [3,000] | |||
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 17,348,749 | 17,348,749 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 31,210,685 | 31,538,885 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –172,839 | |
| COVID-related ops/training slowdown | [–129,339] | |||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–14,800] | |||
| Foreign currency adjustments | [–28,700] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 0 | –172,839 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 38,649,079 | 38,830,740 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE | ||||
| 010 | US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE | 15,211 | 15,211 | |
| SUBTOTAL US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE | 15,211 | 15,211 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 15,211 | 15,211 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID | ||||
| 010 | OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID | 109,900 | 109,900 | |
| SUBTOTAL OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID | 109,900 | 109,900 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 109,900 | 109,900 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION | ||||
| 010 | COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION | 238,490 | 288,490 | |
| DWR restore: Biological Threat Reduction Program | [50,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION | 238,490 | 288,490 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 238,490 | 288,490 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT | ||||
| 010 | ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD | 58,181 | 156,680 | |
| DWR restore OSD-level acquisition workforce activities | [98,499] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT | 58,181 | 156,680 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 58,181 | 156,680 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY | ||||
| 050 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY | 207,518 | 207,518 | |
| SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY | 207,518 | 207,518 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 207,518 | 207,518 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY | ||||
| 060 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY | 335,932 | 335,932 | |
| SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY | 335,932 | 335,932 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 335,932 | 335,932 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE | ||||
| 070 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE | 303,926 | 303,926 | |
| SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE | 303,926 | 303,926 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 303,926 | 303,926 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE | ||||
| 080 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE | 9,105 | 9,105 | |
| SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE | 9,105 | 9,105 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 9,105 | 9,105 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES | ||||
| 090 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES | 216,587 | 216,587 | |
| SUBTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES | 216,587 | 216,587 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 216,587 | 216,587 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 196,630,496 | 195,573,380 | ||
| SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 4,114,001 | 4,114,001 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 32,811 | 32,811 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 2,542,760 | 2,545,410 | |
| EDI: Support to deterrent activities | [2,650] | |||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 162,557 | 162,557 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 204,396 | 204,396 | |
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 5,716,734 | 5,721,224 | |
| EDI: Support to deterrent activities PE 0202218A | [1,490] | |||
| EDI: Support to deterrent activities PE 1001010A | [3,000] | |||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 180,048 | 180,048 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 81,125 | 81,125 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 219,029 | 219,029 | |
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 301,017 | 301,017 | |
| 130 | ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES | 966,649 | 966,649 | |
| 140 | COMMANDER'S EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM | 2,500 | 2,000 | |
| Hero payments funded by ASFF | [–500] | |||
| 150 | RESET | 403,796 | 403,796 | |
| 160 | US AFRICA COMMAND | 100,422 | 100,422 | |
| 170 | US EUROPEAN COMMAND | 120,043 | 144,143 | |
| EDI: Continuity of operations support | [2,100] | |||
| EDI: Modernizing Mission Partner Environment (MPE) | [22,000] | |||
| 200 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 98,461 | 98,461 | |
| 210 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY | 21,256 | 21,256 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 15,267,605 | 15,298,345 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 230 | ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS | 103,052 | 103,052 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 103,052 | 103,052 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 290 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 89,943 | 89,943 | |
| 320 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 2,550 | 2,550 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 92,493 | 92,493 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 390 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 521,090 | 521,090 | |
| 400 | CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES | 43,897 | 43,897 | |
| 410 | LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 68,423 | 68,423 | |
| 420 | AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT | 29,162 | 29,162 | |
| 440 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 11,447 | 11,447 | |
| 470 | OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT | 5,839 | 5,839 | |
| 490 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 48,782 | 48,782 | |
| 510 | INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 895,964 | 895,964 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 1,674,604 | 1,674,604 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 17,137,754 | 17,168,494 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 17,193 | 17,193 | |
| 060 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 440 | 440 | |
| 090 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 15,766 | 15,766 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 33,399 | 33,399 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 33,399 | 33,399 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 25,746 | 25,746 | |
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 40 | 40 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 983 | 983 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 22 | 22 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 20,624 | 20,624 | |
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 7,914 | 7,914 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 24,417 | 24,417 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 79,746 | 79,746 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 170 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 46 | 46 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 46 | 46 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 79,792 | 79,792 | ||
| AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND | ||||
| AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY | ||||
| 010 | SUSTAINMENT | 1,065,932 | 1,065,932 | |
| 020 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 64,501 | 64,501 | |
| 030 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 47,854 | 47,854 | |
| 040 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 56,780 | 56,780 | |
| SUBTOTAL AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY | 1,235,067 | 1,235,067 | ||
| AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE | ||||
| 050 | SUSTAINMENT | 434,500 | 434,500 | |
| 060 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 448 | 448 | |
| 070 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 108,231 | 108,231 | |
| 080 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 58,993 | 58,993 | |
| SUBTOTAL AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE | 602,172 | 602,172 | ||
| AFGHAN AIR FORCE | ||||
| 090 | SUSTAINMENT | 534,102 | 534,102 | |
| 100 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 9,532 | 9,532 | |
| 110 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 58,487 | 58,487 | |
| 120 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 233,803 | 233,803 | |
| SUBTOTAL AFGHAN AIR FORCE | 835,924 | 835,924 | ||
| AFGHAN SPECIAL SECURITY FORCES | ||||
| 130 | SUSTAINMENT | 680,024 | 680,024 | |
| 140 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 2,532 | 2,532 | |
| 150 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 486,808 | 486,808 | |
| 160 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 173,085 | 173,085 | |
| SUBTOTAL AFGHAN SPECIAL SECURITY FORCES | 1,342,449 | 1,342,449 | ||
| TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND | 4,015,612 | 4,015,612 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 382,062 | 382,062 | |
| 030 | AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES | 832 | 832 | |
| 040 | AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT | 17,840 | 17,840 | |
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 210,692 | 210,692 | |
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 170,580 | 170,580 | |
| 070 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 5,854 | 5,854 | |
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 33,707 | 33,707 | |
| 090 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 5,817,696 | 5,817,696 | |
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 20,741 | 20,741 | |
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 2,072,470 | 2,072,470 | |
| 130 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE | 59,254 | 59,254 | |
| 140 | SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE | 18,000 | 18,000 | |
| 150 | WARFARE TACTICS | 17,324 | 17,324 | |
| 160 | OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 22,581 | 22,581 | |
| 170 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 772,441 | 772,441 | |
| 180 | EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 5,788 | 5,788 | |
| 200 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 24,800 | 24,800 | |
| 220 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 369 | 369 | |
| 240 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 567,247 | 567,247 | |
| 250 | OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 12,571 | 12,571 | |
| 270 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 70,041 | 70,041 | |
| 280 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 218,792 | 218,792 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 10,521,682 | 10,521,682 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 320 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 22,589 | 22,589 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 22,589 | 22,589 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 370 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 53,204 | 53,204 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 53,204 | 53,204 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 440 | ADMINISTRATION | 9,983 | 9,983 | |
| 460 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 7,805 | 7,805 | |
| 480 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 72,097 | 72,097 | |
| 510 | ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT | 11,354 | 11,354 | |
| 520 | INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES | 1,591 | 1,591 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 102,830 | 102,830 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 10,700,305 | 10,700,305 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 727,989 | 745,489 | |
| EDI: Globally Integrated Exercise 20–4/Austere Challenge 21.3 | [10,000] | |||
| EDI: Marine European training program | [7,500] | |||
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 195,001 | 195,001 | |
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 55,183 | 55,183 | |
| 050 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| 070 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 24,569 | 24,569 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 1,012,742 | 1,030,242 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 120 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 28,458 | 28,458 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 28,458 | 28,458 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 160 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 61,400 | 61,400 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 61,400 | 61,400 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 1,102,600 | 1,120,100 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE | 522 | 522 | |
| 030 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 11,861 | 11,861 | |
| 080 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 9,109 | 9,109 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 21,492 | 21,492 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 21,492 | 21,492 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATING FORCES | 7,627 | 7,627 | |
| 040 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 1,080 | 1,080 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 8,707 | 8,707 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 8,707 | 8,707 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 125,551 | 125,551 | |
| 020 | COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES | 916,538 | 916,538 | |
| 030 | AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) | 93,970 | 93,970 | |
| 040 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 3,528,059 | 3,528,059 | |
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 147,264 | 147,264 | |
| 060 | CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT | 10,842 | 10,842 | |
| 070 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 7,187,100 | 7,217,545 | |
| Transfer from base | [30,445] | |||
| 080 | FLYING HOUR PROGRAM | 2,031,548 | 2,031,548 | |
| 090 | BASE SUPPORT | 1,540,444 | 1,540,444 | |
| 100 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 13,709 | 13,709 | |
| 110 | OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS | 345,800 | 345,800 | |
| 120 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 17,936 | 17,936 | |
| 130 | TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES | 36,820 | 36,820 | |
| 140 | LAUNCH FACILITIES | 70 | 70 | |
| 150 | SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 1,450 | 1,450 | |
| 160 | US NORTHCOM/NORAD | 725 | 725 | |
| 170 | US STRATCOM | 856 | 856 | |
| 180 | US CYBERCOM | 35,189 | 35,189 | |
| 190 | US CENTCOM | 126,934 | 126,934 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 16,160,805 | 16,191,250 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 240 | AIRLIFT OPERATIONS | 1,271,439 | 1,271,439 | |
| 250 | MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS | 120,866 | 120,866 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 1,392,305 | 1,392,305 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 260 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 200 | 200 | |
| 270 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 352 | 352 | |
| 290 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 27,010 | 27,010 | |
| 300 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 844 | 844 | |
| 310 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 1,199 | 1,199 | |
| 320 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 1,320 | 1,320 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 30,925 | 30,925 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 380 | LOGISTICS OPERATIONS | 164,701 | 164,701 | |
| 390 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 11,782 | 11,782 | |
| 400 | ADMINISTRATION | 3,886 | 3,886 | |
| 410 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 355 | 355 | |
| 420 | OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 100,831 | 85,831 | |
| OSC-I transition to normalized security cooperation | [–15,000] | |||
| 450 | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 29,928 | 29,928 | |
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 34,502 | 34,502 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 345,985 | 330,985 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 17,930,020 | 17,945,465 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | GLOBAL C3I & EARLY WARNING | 227 | 227 | |
| 030 | SPACE LAUNCH OPERATIONS | 321 | 321 | |
| 040 | SPACE OPERATIONS | 15,135 | 15,135 | |
| 070 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 18,268 | 18,268 | |
| 080 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS & SYSTEM SUPPORT | 43,164 | 43,164 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 77,115 | 77,115 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE | 77,115 | 77,115 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 030 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 24,408 | 24,408 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 5,682 | 5,682 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 30,090 | 30,090 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 30,090 | 30,090 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 3,739 | 3,739 | |
| 030 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 61,862 | 61,862 | |
| 050 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 97,108 | 97,108 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 12,933 | 12,933 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 175,642 | 175,642 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 175,642 | 175,642 | ||
| OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 3,799 | 3,799 | |
| 020 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CE2T2 | 6,634 | 6,634 | |
| 040 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES | 898,024 | 898,024 | |
| 060 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE | 1,244,553 | 1,244,553 | |
| 070 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE | 354,951 | 381,951 | |
| Airborne ISR restoration | [27,000] | |||
| 090 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT | 104,535 | 104,535 | |
| 100 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES | 757,744 | 757,744 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 3,370,240 | 3,397,240 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 180 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY | 1,247 | 1,247 | |
| 210 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY | 21,723 | 21,723 | |
| 280 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 56,256 | 56,256 | |
| 290 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER | 3,524 | 3,524 | |
| 330 | DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY | 156,373 | 156,373 | |
| 350 | DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY | 3,555 | 3,555 | |
| 370 | DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 1,557,763 | 1,880,263 | |
| Transfer from CTEF for Iraq train and equip requirements | [322,500] | |||
| 410 | DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | 297,486 | 297,486 | |
| 490 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 16,984 | 16,984 | |
| 530 | WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES | 1,997 | 1,997 | |
| 9999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 535,106 | 535,106 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 2,652,014 | 2,974,514 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 6,022,254 | 6,371,754 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 57,334,782 | 57,747,967 | ||
| SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| MILITARY PERSONNEL | |||
| MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS | |||
| MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS | 150,524,104 | 147,976,014 | |
| COVID related endstrength decreases | [–755,000] | ||
| Foreign currency adjustments, Air Force | [–81,800] | ||
| Foreign currency adjustments, Army | [–44,400] | ||
| Foreign currency adjustments, Marine Corps | [–13,900] | ||
| Foreign currency adjustments, Navy | [–41,300] | ||
| Military personnel historical underexecution | [–1,611,690] | ||
| SUBTOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS | 150,524,104 | 147,976,014 | |
| MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS | |||
| MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS | 8,372,741 | 8,372,741 | |
| SUBTOTAL MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS | 8,372,741 | 8,372,741 | |
| TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL | 158,896,845 | 156,348,755 | |
| SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| MILITARY PERSONNEL | |||
| MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS | |||
| MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS | 4,602,593 | 4,602,593 | |
| SUBTOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS | 4,602,593 | 4,602,593 | |
| TOTAL MILITARY PERSONNEL | 4,602,593 | 4,602,593 | |
| SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND | ||||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | ||||
| 010 | INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS | 32,551 | 5,551 | |
| One-time COVID-related carryover decrease | [–27,000] | |||
| 020 | SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY | 24,166 | 1,166 | |
| One-time COVID-related carryover decrease | [–23,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | 56,717 | 6,717 | ||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | ||||
| 020 | SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS | 95,712 | 5,712 | |
| Air Force cash corpus for energy optimization | [10,000] | |||
| One-time COVID-related carryover decrease | [–100,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | 191,424 | 101,424 | ||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| 020 | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT—DEF | 49,821 | 49,821 | |
| SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | 49,821 | 49,821 | ||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | ||||
| 010 | WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | 1,146,660 | 1,146,660 | |
| SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | 1,146,660 | 1,146,660 | ||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND | 1,444,622 | 1,304,622 | ||
| CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION | ||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | ||||
| 1 | CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—O&M | 106,691 | 106,691 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 106,691 | 106,691 | ||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION | ||||
| 2 | CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—RDT&E | 782,193 | 782,193 | |
| SUBTOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION | 782,193 | 782,193 | ||
| PROCUREMENT | ||||
| 3 | CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—PROC | 616 | 616 | |
| SUBTOTAL PROCUREMENT | 616 | 616 | ||
| TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION | 889,500 | 889,500 | ||
| DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | ||||
| DRUG INTRDCTN | ||||
| 010 | COUNTER-NARCOTICS SUPPORT | 546,203 | 562,003 | |
| PDI: Joint Interagency Task Force—West Project 3309 | [13,000] | |||
| PDI: Joint Interagency Task Force—West Project 9202 | [2,800] | |||
| SUBTOTAL DRUG INTRDCTN | 546,203 | 562,003 | ||
| DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM | ||||
| 020 | DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM | 123,704 | 123,704 | |
| SUBTOTAL DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM | 123,704 | 123,704 | ||
| NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM | ||||
| 030 | NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM | 94,211 | 94,211 | |
| SUBTOTAL NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM | 94,211 | 94,211 | ||
| NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS | ||||
| 040 | NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS | 5,511 | 5,511 | |
| SUBTOTAL NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS | 5,511 | 5,511 | ||
| TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | 769,629 | 785,429 | ||
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | ||||
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | ||||
| 010 | OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 368,279 | 368,279 | |
| 030 | OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL—CYBER | 1,204 | 1,204 | |
| 040 | OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 1,098 | 1,098 | |
| 050 | OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 858 | 858 | |
| SUBTOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 371,439 | 371,439 | ||
| TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 371,439 | 371,439 | ||
| DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | ||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | ||||
| 010 | IN-HOUSE CARE | 9,560,564 | 9,560,564 | |
| 020 | PRIVATE SECTOR CARE | 15,841,887 | 15,841,887 | |
| 030 | CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT | 1,338,269 | 1,338,269 | |
| 040 | INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | 2,039,910 | 2,039,910 | |
| 050 | MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES | 330,627 | 330,627 | |
| 060 | EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 315,691 | 315,691 | |
| 070 | BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS | 1,922,605 | 1,927,605 | |
| National Disaster Medical System pilot program | [5,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 31,349,553 | 31,354,553 | ||
| RDT&E | ||||
| 080 | R&D RESEARCH | 8,913 | 8,913 | |
| 090 | R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT | 73,984 | 73,984 | |
| 100 | R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 225,602 | 225,602 | |
| 110 | R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION | 132,331 | 132,331 | |
| 120 | R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | 55,748 | 55,748 | |
| 130 | R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT | 48,672 | 48,672 | |
| 140 | R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT | 17,215 | 17,215 | |
| SUBTOTAL RDT&E | 562,465 | 562,465 | ||
| PROCUREMENT | ||||
| 150 | PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING | 22,932 | 22,932 | |
| 160 | PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION | 215,618 | 215,618 | |
| 170 | PROC MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM—DESKTOP TO DATACENTER | 70,872 | 70,872 | |
| 180 | PROC DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION | 308,504 | 308,504 | |
| SUBTOTAL PROCUREMENT | 617,926 | 617,926 | ||
| SOFTWARE & DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | ||||
| 190 | SOFTWARE & DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | 160,428 | 160,428 | |
| SUBTOTAL SOFTWARE & DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY PILOT PROGRAMS | 160,428 | 160,428 | ||
| TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | 32,690,372 | 32,695,372 | ||
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 36,711,765 | 36,592,565 | ||
| SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND | ||||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | ||||
| 020 | SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY | 20,090 | 20,090 | |
| SUBTOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | 20,090 | 20,090 | ||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND | 20,090 | 20,090 | ||
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | ||||
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | ||||
| 010 | OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 24,069 | 24,069 | |
| SUBTOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 24,069 | 24,069 | ||
| TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 24,069 | 24,069 | ||
| DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | ||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | ||||
| 010 | IN-HOUSE CARE | 65,072 | 65,072 | |
| 020 | PRIVATE SECTOR CARE | 296,828 | 296,828 | |
| 030 | CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT | 3,198 | 3,198 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 365,098 | 365,098 | ||
| TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | 365,098 | 365,098 | ||
| COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) | ||||
| COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) | ||||
| 010 | IRAQ | 645,000 | 322,500 | |
| Transfer traditional BPC activities to DSCA | [–322,500] | |||
| 020 | SYRIA | 200,000 | 200,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) | 845,000 | 522,500 | ||
| TOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) | 845,000 | 522,500 | ||
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 1,254,257 | 931,757 | ||
| SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||
| Account | State/Country and Installation | Project Title | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | ||
| MILITARY CONSTRUCTION | ||||||
| ARMY | ||||||
| Alaska | ||||||
| Army | Fort Wainwright | Child Development Center | 0 | 55,000 | ||
| Army | Fort Wainwright | Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing | 0 | 59,000 | ||
| Arizona | ||||||
| Army | Yuma Proving Ground | Ready Building | 14,000 | 14,000 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Army | Military Ocean Terminal Concord | Ammunition Holding Facility | 0 | 46,000 | ||
| Colorado | ||||||
| Army | Fort Carson | Physical Fitness Facility | 28,000 | 28,000 | ||
| Florida | ||||||
| Army | JIATF-S Operations Center | Planning & Design | 0 | 8,000 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| Army | Fort Gillem | Forensic Laboratory | 71,000 | 71,000 | ||
| Army | Fort Gordon | Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph3 | 80,000 | 80,000 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Army | Aliamanu Military Reservation | Child Development Center—School Age | 0 | 71,000 | ||
| Army | Schofield Barracks | Child Development Center | 0 | 39,000 | ||
| Army | Wheeler Army Air Field | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | 89,000 | 89,000 | ||
| Italy | ||||||
| Army | Casmera Renato Dal Din | Access Control Point | 0 | 10,200 | ||
| Louisiana | ||||||
| Army | Fort Polk | Information Systems Facility | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||
| Oklahoma | ||||||
| Army | McAlester AAP | Ammunition Demolition Shop | 35,000 | 35,000 | ||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||
| Army | Carlisle Barracks | General Instruction Building (Inc 2) | 38,000 | 8,000 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| Army | Fort Jackson | Trainee Barracks Complex 3, Ph2 | 0 | 7,000 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Army | Humphreys Engineer Center | Training Support Facility | 51,000 | 51,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 129,436 | 59,436 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Host Nation Support | 39,000 | 39,000 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 50,900 | 74,900 | ||
| SUBTOTAL ARMY | 650,336 | 869,536 | ||||
| NAVY | ||||||
| Bahrain Island | ||||||
| Navy | SW Asia | Ship to Shore Utility Services | 68,340 | 68,340 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Navy | Camp Pendleton | Combat Water Survival Training Facility | 0 | 25,200 | ||
| Navy | Camp Pendleton | Warehouse Consolidation and Modernization | 0 | 21,800 | ||
| Navy | Camp Pendleton | I MEF Consolidated Information Center (INC) | 37,000 | 37,000 | ||
| Navy | Camp Pendleton | 1st MARDIV Operations Complex | 68,530 | 68,530 | ||
| Navy | Lemoore | F–35C Simulator Facility & Electrical Upgrade | 59,150 | 59,150 | ||
| Navy | Lemoore | F–35C Hangar 6 Phase 2 (Mod 3/4) | 128,070 | 53,000 | ||
| Navy | Point Mugu | Directed Energy Test Facility | 0 | 26,700 | ||
| Navy | Port Hueneme | Combat Vehicle Maintenance Facilities | 0 | 43,500 | ||
| Navy | San Diego | Pier 6 Replacement | 128,500 | 63,500 | ||
| Navy | Seal Beach | Magazines | 0 | 46,800 | ||
| Navy | Twentynine Palms | Wastewater Treatment Plant | 76,500 | 76,500 | ||
| Greece | ||||||
| Navy | Souda Bay | Communication Center | 50,180 | 50,180 | ||
| Guam | ||||||
| Navy | Andersen Air Force Base | Ordnance Operations Admin | 21,280 | 21,280 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | DAR Road Strengthening | 70,760 | 70,760 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | DAR Bridge Improvements | 40,180 | 40,180 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Central Fuel Station | 35,950 | 17,950 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Distribution Warehouse | 77,930 | 77,930 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Combined EOD Facility | 37,600 | 37,600 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (Inc) | 80,000 | 10,000 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Joint Communication Upgrade | 166,000 | 26,000 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Base Warehouse | 55,410 | 55,410 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Individual Combat Skills Training | 17,430 | 17,430 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Central Issue Facility | 45,290 | 45,290 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Navy | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | Waterfront Improvements Wharves S8–S10 | 65,910 | 65,910 | ||
| Navy | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | Waterfront Improve, Wharves S1,S11–13,S20–21 | 48,990 | 48,990 | ||
| Honduras | ||||||
| Navy | Comalapa | Long Range Maritime Patrol Aircraft Hangar and Ramp | 0 | 28,000 | ||
| Japan | ||||||
| Navy | Yokosuka | Pier 5 (Berths 2 and 3) (Inc) | 74,692 | 44,692 | ||
| Maine | ||||||
| Navy | Kittery | Multi-Mission Drydock #1 Exten., Ph 1 (Inc) | 160,000 | 160,000 | ||
| Navy | NCTAMS LANT Detachment Cutler | Perimeter Security | 0 | 26,100 | ||
| Nevada | ||||||
| Navy | Fallon | Range Training Complex, Phase 1 | 29,040 | 29,040 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Navy | Camp Lejeune | II MEF Operations Center Replacement (Inc) | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| Navy | Cherry Point | Fitness Center Replacement and Training Pool | 0 | 51,900 | ||
| Spain | ||||||
| Navy | Rota | MH–60R Squadron Support Facilities | 60,110 | 60,110 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Navy | Norfolk | Sub Logistics Support | 0 | 9,400 | ||
| Navy | Norfolk | MH60 & CMV–22B Corrosion Control & Paint Facility | 17,671 | 17,671 | ||
| Navy | Norfolk | E–2D Training Facility | 30,400 | 30,400 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 38,983 | 38,983 | ||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 165,710 | 165,710 | ||
| SUBTOTAL NAVY | 1,975,606 | 1,856,936 | ||||
| AIR FORCE | ||||||
| Colorado | ||||||
| Air Force | Schriever Air Force Base | Consolidated Space Operations Facility, (Inc 2) | 88,000 | 88,000 | ||
| Air Force | United States Air Force Academy | Cadet Preparatory School Dormitory | 0 | 49,000 | ||
| Guam | ||||||
| Air Force | Joint Region Marianas | Stand Off Weapons Complex, MSA 2 | 56,000 | 56,000 | ||
| Mariana Islands | ||||||
| Air Force | Tinian | Fuel Tanks With Pipeline & Hydrant Sys, (Inc 2) | 7,000 | 7,000 | ||
| Air Force | Tinian | Airfield Development Phase 1, (Inc 2) | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| Air Force | Tinian | Parking Apron, (Inc 2) | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| Montana | ||||||
| Air Force | Malmstrom Air Force Base | Weapons Storage & Maintenance Facility, (Inc 2) | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||
| New Jersey | ||||||
| Air Force | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | Munitions Storage Area | 22,000 | 22,000 | ||
| Qatar | ||||||
| Air Force | Al Udeid | Cargo Marshalling Yard | 26,000 | 26,000 | ||
| South Dakota | ||||||
| Air Force | Ellsworth Air Force Base | B–21 2–Bay LO Restoration Facility | 0 | 10,000 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| Air Force | Joint Base San Antonio | BMT Recruit Dormitory 8, (Inc 2) | 36,000 | 36,000 | ||
| Air Force | Joint Base San Antonio | T-X ADAL Ground Based Trng Sys Sim | 19,500 | 19,500 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| Air Force | Hill Air Force Base | GBSD Organic Software Sustainment Center | 0 | 20,000 | ||
| Air Force | Hill Air Force Base | GBSD Mission Integration Facility, (Inc 2) | 68,000 | 68,000 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Air Force | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | Access Control Point Main Gate With Land Acq | 19,500 | 19,500 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Cost to Complete | 0 | 29,422 | ||
| Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 296,532 | 116,532 | ||
| Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 68,600 | 68,600 | ||
| SUBTOTAL AIR FORCE | 767,132 | 695,554 | ||||
| DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||||
| Alabama | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Anniston Army Depot | Demilitarization Facility | 18,000 | 18,000 | ||
| Alaska | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Greely | Communications Center | 48,000 | 48,000 | ||
| Albama | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Rucker | Construct 10mw Generation & Microgrid | 0 | 24,000 | ||
| Arizona | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Huachuca | Laboratory Building | 33,728 | 33,728 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Yuma | SOF Hangar | 49,500 | 49,500 | ||
| Arkansas | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Smith Air National Guard Base | PV Arrays and Battery Storage | 0 | 2,600 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Beale Air Force Base | Bulk Fuel Tank | 22,800 | 22,800 | ||
| Colorado | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Carson | SOF Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility | 15,600 | 15,600 | ||
| CONUS Unspecified | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | CONUS Unspecified | Training Target Structure | 14,400 | 14,400 | ||
| Florida | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Hurlburt Field | SOF Special Tactics Ops Facility (23 STS) | 44,810 | 44,810 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Hurlburt Field | SOF Combat Aircraft Parking Apron-North | 38,310 | 38,310 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Benning | Construct 4.8mw Generation & Microgrid | 0 | 17,000 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Rhine Ordnance Barracks | Medical Center Replacement (Inc 9) | 200,000 | 0 | ||
| Japan | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Def Fuel Support Point Tsurumi | Fuel Wharf | 49,500 | 49,500 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Yokosuka | Kinnick High School (Inc) | 30,000 | 0 | ||
| Kentucky | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Knox | Van Voorhis Elementary School | 69,310 | 69,310 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Bethesda Naval Hospital | MEDCEN Addition/Alteration (Inc 4) | 180,000 | 50,000 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Meade | NSAW Recapitalize Building #3 (Inc) | 250,000 | 250,000 | ||
| Mississippi | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | MTA Camp Shelby | Construct 10mw Generation Plant and Microgrid System | 0 | 30,000 | ||
| Missouri | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Leonard Wood | Hospital Replacement (Inc 3) | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||
| Defense-Wide | St Louis | Next NGA West (N2W) Complex Phase 2 (Inc) | 119,000 | 60,000 | ||
| New Mexico | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Kirtland Air Force Base | Administrative Building | 46,600 | 46,600 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOTF Chilled Water Upgrade | 0 | 6,100 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Military Working Dog Facility | 17,700 | 17,700 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Group Headquarters | 53,100 | 53,100 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Operations Facility | 43,000 | 43,000 | ||
| Ohio | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | Intelligence Facility Central Utility Plant | 0 | 35,000 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | Hydrant Fuel System | 23,500 | 23,500 | ||
| Tennessee | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Memphis International Airport | PV Arrays and Battery Storage | 0 | 4,780 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Fort Hood | Fuel Facilities | 32,700 | 32,700 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story | SOF DCS Operations Fac. and Command Center | 54,500 | 54,500 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story | SOF NSWG–2 NSWTG CSS Facilities | 58,000 | 58,000 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | Fuel Facilities (Lewis North) | 10,900 | 10,900 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | Fuel Facilities (Lewis Main) | 10,900 | 10,900 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Manchester | Bulk Fuel Storage Tanks Phase 1 | 82,000 | 82,000 | ||
| Washington DC | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling | DIA HQ Cooling Towers and Cond Pumps | 0 | 1,963 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling | Industrial Controls System Modernization | 0 | 8,749 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling | PV Carports | 0 | 25,221 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 8,000 | 8,000 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 27,746 | 27,746 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 4,922 | 4,922 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 17,698 | 17,698 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Energy Resilience and Conserv. Invest. Prog. | 142,500 | 142,500 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 10,647 | 10,647 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ERCIP Design | 14,250 | 14,250 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 10,303 | 10,303 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Exercise Related Minor Construction | 5,840 | 5,840 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 32,624 | 32,624 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Various Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 9,726 | 9,726 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 64,406 | 64,406 | ||
| Worlwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design—Military Installation Resiliency | 0 | 50,000 | ||
| Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design—Pacific Deterrence Initiative | 0 | 15,000 | ||
| SUBTOTAL DEFENSE-WIDE | 2,027,520 | 1,828,933 | ||||
| ARMY NATIONAL GUARD | ||||||
| Arizona | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Tucson | National Guard Readiness Center | 18,100 | 18,100 | ||
| Arkansas | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Fort Chaffee | National Guard Readiness Center | 0 | 15,000 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Bakersfield | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 0 | 9,300 | ||
| Colorado | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Peterson Air Force Base | National Guard Readiness Center | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| Indiana | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Shelbyville | National Guard/Reserve Center Building Add/Al | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||
| Kentucky | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Frankfort | National Guard/Reserve Center Building | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| Mississippi | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Brandon | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 10,400 | 10,400 | ||
| Nebraska | ||||||
| Army National Guard | North Platte | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 9,300 | 9,300 | ||
| New Jersey | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | National Guard Readiness Center | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| Ohio | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Columbus | National Guard Readiness Center | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| Oklahoma | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Ardmore | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 0 | 9,800 | ||
| Oregon | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Hermiston | Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training | 0 | 15,735 | ||
| Army National Guard | Hermiston | Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training | 9,300 | 9,300 | ||
| Puerto Rico | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Fort Allen | National Guard Readiness Center | 37,000 | 37,000 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Joint Base Charleston | National Guard Readiness Center | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| Tennessee | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Mcminnville | National Guard Readiness Center | 11,200 | 11,200 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Fort Worth | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 7,800 | 7,800 | ||
| Army National Guard | Fort Worth | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Addition/Alt | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Nephi | National Guard Readiness Center | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||
| Virgin Islands | ||||||
| Army National Guard | St. Croix | Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF) | 28,000 | 28,000 | ||
| Army National Guard | St. Croix | CST Ready Building | 11,400 | 11,400 | ||
| Wisconsin | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Appleton | National Guard Readiness Center Add/Alt | 11,600 | 11,600 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army National Guard | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 32,744 | 32,744 | ||
| Army National Guard | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 29,593 | 29,593 | ||
| SUBTOTAL ARMY NATIONAL GUARD | 321,437 | 371,272 | ||||
| AIR NATIONAL GUARD | ||||||
| Alabama | ||||||
| Air National Guard | Montgomery Regional Airport | Base Supply Complex | 0 | 12,000 | ||
| Air National Guard | Montgomery Regional Airport | F–35 Simulator Facility | 11,600 | 11,600 | ||
| Guam | ||||||
| Air National Guard | Joint Region Marianas | Space Control Facility #5 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Air National Guard | Joint Base Andrews | F–16 Mission Training Center | 9,400 | 9,400 | ||
| North Dakota | ||||||
| Air National Guard | Hector International Airport | Consolidated RPA Operations Facility | 0 | 17,500 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| Air National Guard | Joint Base San Antonio | F–16 Mission Training Center | 10,800 | 10,800 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Air National Guard | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 9,000 | 9,000 | ||
| Air National Guard | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 3,414 | 3,414 | ||
| SUBTOTAL AIR NATIONAL GUARD | 64,214 | 93,714 | ||||
| ARMY RESERVE | ||||||
| Florida | ||||||
| Army Reserve | Gainesville | ECS TEMF/Warehouse | 36,000 | 36,000 | ||
| Massachusetts | ||||||
| Army Reserve | Devens Reserve Forces Training Area | Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range | 8,700 | 8,700 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Army Reserve | Asheville | Army Reserve Center/Land | 24,000 | 24,000 | ||
| Wisconsin | ||||||
| Army Reserve | Fort McCoy | Transient Training Barracks | 0 | 2,500 | ||
| Army Reserve | Fort McCoy | Scout Reconnaissance Range | 14,600 | 14,600 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army Reserve | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 3,819 | 3,819 | ||
| Army Reserve | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 1,218 | 1,218 | ||
| SUBTOTAL ARMY RESERVE | 88,337 | 90,837 | ||||
| NAVY RESERVE | ||||||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Navy Reserve | Reisterstown | Reserve Training Center, Camp Fretterd, MD | 39,500 | 39,500 | ||
| Minnesota | ||||||
| Navy Reserve | NOSC Minneapolis | Joint Reserve Intel Center | 0 | 12,800 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| Navy Reserve | Hill Air Force Base | Naval Operational Support Center | 25,010 | 25,010 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy Reserve | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | MCNR Planning & Design | 3,485 | 3,485 | ||
| Navy Reserve | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | MCNR Minor Construction | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| SUBTOTAL NAVY RESERVE | 70,995 | 83,795 | ||||
| AIR FORCE RESERVE | ||||||
| Texas | ||||||
| Air Force Reserve | Fort Worth | F–35 Squadron Ops / Aircraft Maintenance Unit | 0 | 25,000 | ||
| Air Force Reserve | Fort Worth | F–35A Simulator Facility | 14,200 | 14,200 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Air Force Reserve | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 3,270 | 3,270 | ||
| Air Force Reserve | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 5,647 | 5,647 | ||
| SUBTOTAL AIR FORCE RESERVE | 23,117 | 48,117 | ||||
| NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| NATO Security Investment Program | NATO Security Investment Program | NATO Security Investment Program | 173,030 | 173,030 | ||
| SUBTOTAL NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM | 173,030 | 173,030 | ||||
| TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION | 6,161,724 | 6,111,724 | ||||
| FAMILY HOUSING | ||||||
| CONSTRUCTION, ARMY | ||||||
| Italy | ||||||
| Construction, Army | Vicenza | Family Housing New Construction | 84,100 | 84,100 | ||
| Kwajalein | ||||||
| Construction, Army | Kwajalein Atoll | Family Housing Replacement Construction | 32,000 | 32,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Construction, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Family Housing P & D | 3,300 | 3,300 | ||
| SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION, ARMY | 119,400 | 119,400 | ||||
| O&M, ARMY | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| O&M, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 39,716 | 39,716 | ||
| O&M, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 8,135 | 8,135 | ||
| O&M, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 18,004 | 18,004 | ||
| O&M, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 526 | 526 | ||
| O&M, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 97,789 | 70,789 | ||
| O&M, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 41,183 | 41,183 | ||
| O&M, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 123,841 | 123,841 | ||
| O&M, Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privitization Support | 37,948 | 64,948 | ||
| SUBTOTAL O&M, ARMY | 367,142 | 367,142 | ||||
| CONSTRUCTION, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Construction, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | USMC DPRI/Guam Planning and Design | 2,726 | 2,726 | ||
| Construction, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Construction Improvements | 37,043 | 37,043 | ||
| Construction, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 3,128 | 3,128 | ||
| SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS | 42,897 | 42,897 | ||||
| O&M, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| O&M, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 58,429 | 58,429 | ||
| O&M, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 17,977 | 17,977 | ||
| O&M, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 51,006 | 51,006 | ||
| O&M, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 350 | 350 | ||
| O&M, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 16,743 | 16,743 | ||
| O&M, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 62,658 | 62,658 | ||
| O&M, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 85,630 | 85,630 | ||
| O&M, Navy and Marine Corps | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privatization Support | 53,700 | 78,700 | ||
| SUBTOTAL O&M, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS | 346,493 | 371,493 | ||||
| CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Construction, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Construction Improvements | 94,245 | 94,245 | ||
| Construction, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 2,969 | 2,969 | ||
| SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE | 97,214 | 97,214 | ||||
| O&M, AIR FORCE | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| O&M, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privatization | 23,175 | 48,175 | ||
| O&M, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 43,173 | 43,173 | ||
| O&M, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 64,732 | 64,732 | ||
| O&M, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 7,968 | 7,968 | ||
| O&M, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 25,805 | 25,805 | ||
| O&M, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 2,184 | 2,184 | ||
| O&M, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 9,318 | 9,318 | ||
| O&M, Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 140,666 | 140,666 | ||
| SUBTOTAL O&M, AIR FORCE | 317,021 | 342,021 | ||||
| O&M, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| O&M, Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 4,100 | 4,100 | ||
| O&M, Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 82 | 82 | ||
| O&M, Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 13 | 13 | ||
| O&M, Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 12,996 | 12,996 | ||
| O&M, Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 32 | 32 | ||
| O&M, Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 645 | 645 | ||
| O&M, Defense-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 36,860 | 36,860 | ||
| SUBTOTAL O&M, DEFENSE-WIDE | 54,728 | 54,728 | ||||
| IMPROVEMENT FUND | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Improvement Fund | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Administrative Expenses—FHIF | 5,897 | 5,897 | ||
| SUBTOTAL IMPROVEMENT FUND | 5,897 | 5,897 | ||||
| UNACCMP HSG IMPROVEMENT FUND | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Unaccmp HSG Improvement Fund | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Administrative Expenses—UHIF | 600 | 600 | ||
| SUBTOTAL UNACCMP HSG IMPROVEMENT FUND | 600 | 600 | ||||
| TOTAL FAMILY HOUSING | 1,351,392 | 1,401,392 | ||||
| DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE | ||||||
| ARMY BRAC | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army BRAC | Base Realignment & Closure, Army | Base Realignment and Closure | 66,060 | 66,060 | ||
| SUBTOTAL ARMY BRAC | 66,060 | 66,060 | ||||
| NAVY BRAC | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Base Realignment & Closure | 125,165 | 125,165 | ||
| SUBTOTAL NAVY BRAC | 125,165 | 125,165 | ||||
| AIR FORCE BRAC | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Air Force BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Dod BRAC Activities—Air Force | 109,222 | 109,222 | ||
| SUBTOTAL AIR FORCE BRAC | 109,222 | 109,222 | ||||
| TOTAL DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE | 300,447 | 300,447 | ||||
| TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, FAMILY HOUSING, AND BRAC | 7,813,563 | 7,813,563 | ||||
| SEC. 4602. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||
| Account | State or Country and Installation | Project Title | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | ||
| MILITARY CONSTRUCTION | ||||||
| ARMY | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI: Planning and Design | 11,903 | 11,903 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI: Minor Construction | 3,970 | 3,970 | ||
| SUBTOTAL ARMY | 15,873 | 15,873 | ||||
| NAVY | ||||||
| Spain | ||||||
| Navy | Rota | EDI: Expeditionary Maintenance Facility | 27,470 | 27,470 | ||
| Navy | Rota | EDI: EOD Boat Shop | 31,760 | 31,760 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 10,790 | 10,790 | ||
| SUBTOTAL NAVY | 70,020 | 70,020 | ||||
| AIR FORCE | ||||||
| Germany | ||||||
| Air Force | Ramstein | EDI: Rapid Airfield Damage Repair Storage | 36,345 | 36,345 | ||
| Air Force | Spangdahlem AB | EDI: Rapid Airfield Damage Repair Storage | 25,824 | 25,824 | ||
| Romania | ||||||
| Air Force | Campia Turzii | EDI: Dangerous Cargo Pad | 11,000 | 11,000 | ||
| Air Force | Campia Turzii | EDI: POL Increase Capacity | 32,000 | 32,000 | ||
| Air Force | Campia Turzii | EDI: ECAOS DABS-FEV Storage Complex | 68,000 | 68,000 | ||
| Air Force | Campia Turzii | EDI: Parking Apron | 19,500 | 19,500 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Air Force | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI: Unspecified Minor Military Construction | 16,400 | 16,400 | ||
| Air Force | Various Worldwide Locations | EDI: Planning & Design | 54,800 | 54,800 | ||
| SUBTOTAL AIR FORCE | 263,869 | 263,869 | ||||
| TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION | 349,762 | 349,762 | ||||
| TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, FAMILY HOUSING, AND BRAC | 349,762 | 349,762 | ||||
| SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Program | FY 2021 Request | Senate Authorized | |
| Discretionary Summary by Appropriation | |||
| Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies | |||
| Appropriation Summary: | |||
| Energy Programs | |||
| Nuclear energy | 137,800 | 137,800 | |
| Atomic Energy Defense Activities | |||
| National Nuclear Security Administration: | |||
| Federal Salaries and Expenses | 454,000 | 454,000 | |
| Weapons activities | 15,602,000 | 15,602,000 | |
| Defense nuclear nonproliferation | 2,031,000 | 2,031,000 | |
| Naval reactors | 1,684,000 | 1,684,000 | |
| Total, National Nuclear Security Administration | 19,771,000 | 19,771,000 | |
| Defense environmental cleanup | 4,983,608 | 5,083,608 | |
| Other defense activities | 1,054,727 | 904,727 | |
| Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities | 25,809,335 | 25,759,335 | |
| Total, Discretionary Funding | 25,947,135 | 25,897,135 | |
| Nuclear Energy | |||
| Idaho sitewide safeguards and security | 137,800 | 137,800 | |
| Total, Nuclear Energy | 137,800 | 137,800 | |
| National Nuclear Security Administration | |||
| Federal Salaries and Expenses | |||
| Program direction | 454,000 | 454,000 | |
| Weapons Activities | |||
| Stockpile management | |||
| Stockpile major modernization | |||
| B61 Life extension program | 815,710 | 815,710 | |
| W76 Life extension program | 0 | 0 | |
| W76–2 Modification program | 0 | 0 | |
| W88 Alteration program | 256,922 | 256,922 | |
| W80–4 Life extension program | 1,000,314 | 1,000,314 | |
| W87–1 Modification Program (formerly IW1) | 541,000 | 541,000 | |
| W93 | 53,000 | 53,000 | |
| Total, Stockpile major modernization | 2,666,946 | 2,666,946 | |
| Stockpile sustainment | 998,357 | 998,357 | |
| Weapons dismantlement and disposition | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| Production operations | 568,941 | 568,941 | |
| Total, Stockpile management | 4,284,244 | 4,284,244 | |
| Production modernization | |||
| Primary capability modernization | |||
| Plutonium modernization | |||
| Los Alamos plutonium modernization | |||
| Los Alamos Plutonium Operations | 610,599 | 610,599 | |
| 21–D–512, Plutonium Pit Production Project, LANL | 226,000 | 226,000 | |
| Subtotal, Los Alamos plutonium modernization | 836,599 | 836,599 | |
| Savannah River plutonium modernization | |||
| Savannah River plutonium operations | 200,000 | 200,000 | |
| 21–D–511, Savannah River Plutonium Processing Facility, SRS | 241,896 | 241,896 | |
| Subtotal, Savannah River plutonium modernization | 441,896 | 441,896 | |
| Enterprise Plutonium Support | 90,782 | 90,782 | |
| Total, Plutonium Modernization | 1,369,277 | 1,369,277 | |
| High Explosives & Energetics | 67,370 | 67,370 | |
| Total, Primary capability modernization | 1,436,647 | 1,436,647 | |
| Secondary Capability Modernization | 457,004 | 457,004 | |
| Tritium and Domestic Uranium Enrichment | 457,112 | 457,112 | |
| Non-Nuclear Capability Modernization | 107,137 | 107,137 | |
| Total, Production modernization | 2,457,900 | 2,457,900 | |
| Stockpile research, technology, and engineering | |||
| Assessment science | 773,111 | 773,111 | |
| Engineering and integrated assessments | 337,404 | 337,404 | |
| Intertial confinement fusion | 554,725 | 554,725 | |
| Advanced simulation and computing | 732,014 | 732,014 | |
| Weapon technology and manufacturing maturation | 297,965 | 297,965 | |
| Academic programs | 86,912 | 86,912 | |
| Total, Stockpile research, technology, and engineering | 2,782,131 | 2,782,131 | |
| Infrastructure and operations | |||
| Operating | |||
| Operations of facilities | 1,014,000 | 1,014,000 | |
| Safety and Environmental Operations | 165,354 | 165,354 | |
| Maintenance and Repair of Facilities | 792,000 | 792,000 | |
| Recapitalization | |||
| Infrastructure and Safety | 670,000 | 670,000 | |
| Capabilities Based Investments | 149,117 | 149,117 | |
| Planning for Programmatic Construction (Pre-CD–1) | 84,787 | 84,787 | |
| Subtotal, Recapitalization | 903,904 | 903,904 | |
| Total, Operating | 2,875,258 | 2,875,258 | |
| I&O: Construction | |||
| Programmatic | |||
| 21–D–510, HE Synthesis, Formulation, and Production Facility, PX | 31,000 | 31,000 | |
| 18–D–690, Lithium Processing Facility, Y–12 | 109,405 | 109,405 | |
| 18–D–650, Tritium Finishing Facility, SRS | 27,000 | 27,000 | |
| 18–D–620, Exascale Computing Facility Modernization Project, LLNL | 29,200 | 29,200 | |
| 17–D–640, U1a Complex Enhancements Project, NNSS | 160,600 | 160,600 | |
| 15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestment Project—Phase 3, LANL | 30,000 | 30,000 | |
| 15–D–301, HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX | 43,000 | 43,000 | |
| 07–D–220-04, Transuranic Liquid Waste Facility, LANL | 36,687 | 36,687 | |
| 06–D–141, Uranium Processing Facility, Y–12 | 750,000 | 750,000 | |
| 04–D–125, Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Project, LANL | 169,427 | 169,427 | |
| Total, Programmatic | 1,386,319 | 1,386,319 | |
| Mission enabling | |||
| 19–D–670, 138kV Power Transmission System Replacement, NNSS | 59,000 | 59,000 | |
| 15–D–612, Emergency Operations Center, LLNL | 27,000 | 27,000 | |
| 15–D–611, Emergency Operations Center, SNL | 36,000 | 36,000 | |
| Total, Mission enabling | 122,000 | 122,000 | |
| Total, I&O construction | 1,508,319 | 1,508,319 | |
| Total, Infrastructure and operations | 4,383,577 | 4,383,577 | |
| Secure transportation asset | |||
| Operations and equipment | 266,390 | 266,390 | |
| Program direction | 123,684 | 123,684 | |
| Total, Secure transportation asset | 390,074 | 390,074 | |
| Defense nuclear security | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 815,895 | 815,895 | |
| Security improvements program | 0 | 0 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 17–D–710, West end protected area reduction project, Y–12 | 11,000 | 11,000 | |
| Subtotal, construction | 11,000 | 11,000 | |
| Total, Defense nuclear security | 826,895 | 826,895 | |
| Information technology and cybersecurity | 375,511 | 375,511 | |
| Legacy contractor pensions | 101,668 | 101,668 | |
| Total, Weapons activities | 16,056,000 | 16,056,000 | |
| Adjustments | |||
| Use of prior year balances | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Adjustments | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Weapons Activities | 15,602,000 | 15,602,000 | |
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | |||
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs | |||
| Material management and minimization | |||
| Conversion (formerly HEU Reactor Conversion) | 170,000 | 170,000 | |
| Nuclear material removal | 40,000 | 40,000 | |
| Material disposition | 190,711 | 190,711 | |
| Laboratory and partnership support | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Material management & minimization | 400,711 | 400,711 | |
| Global material security | 0 | ||
| International nuclear security | 66,391 | 66,391 | |
| Domestic radiological security | 101,000 | 101,000 | |
| International radiological security | 73,340 | 73,340 | |
| Nuclear smuggling detection and deterrence | 159,749 | 159,749 | |
| Total, Global material security | 400,480 | 400,480 | |
| Nonproliferation and arms control | 138,708 | 138,708 | |
| National Technical Nuclear Forensics R&D | 40,000 | 40,000 | |
| Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D | |||
| Proliferation detection | 235,220 | 235,220 | |
| Nonproliferation Stewardship program | 59,900 | 59,900 | |
| Nuclear detonation detection | 236,531 | 236,531 | |
| Nonproliferation fuels development | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D | 531,651 | 531,651 | |
| Nonproliferation construction | |||
| U. S. Construction: | |||
| 18–D–150 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Project | 148,589 | 148,589 | |
| 99–D–143, Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility, SRS | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, U. S. Construction: | 148,589 | 148,589 | |
| Total, Nonproliferation construction | 148,589 | 148,589 | |
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs | 1,660,139 | 1,660,139 | |
| Legacy contractor pensions | 14,348 | 14,348 | |
| Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response program | |||
| Emergency Operations | 36,000 | 36,000 | |
| Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation | 341,513 | 341,513 | |
| Total, Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response program | 377,513 | 377,513 | |
| Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | 2,052,000 | 2,052,000 | |
| Adjustments | |||
| Use of prior year balances | –21,000 | –21,000 | |
| Total, Adjustments | –21,000 | –21,000 | |
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | 2,031,000 | 2,031,000 | |
| Naval Reactors | |||
| Naval reactors development | 590,306 | 590,306 | |
| Columbia-Class reactor systems development | 64,700 | 64,700 | |
| S8G Prototype refueling | 135,000 | 135,000 | |
| Naval reactors operations and infrastructure | 506,294 | 506,294 | |
| Program direction | 53,700 | 53,700 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 21–D–530 KL Steam and Condensate Upgrades | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
| 14–D–901, Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF | 330,000 | 330,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 334,000 | 334,000 | |
| Transfer to NE—Advanced Test Reactor (non-add) | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Naval Reactors | 1,684,000 | 1,684,000 | |
| TOTAL, National Nuclear Security Administration | 19,771,000 | 19,771,000 | |
| Defense Environmental Cleanup | |||
| Closure sites administration | 4,987 | 4,987 | |
| Richland: | |||
| River corridor and other cleanup operations | 54,949 | 54,949 | |
| Central plateau remediation | 498,335 | 498,335 | |
| Richland community and regulatory support | 2,500 | 2,500 | |
| 18–D–404 Modification of Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Richland | 555,784 | 555,784 | |
| Office of River Protection: | |||
| Waste Treatment Immobilization Plant Commissioning | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 597,757 | 597,757 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 18–D–16 Waste treatment and immobilization plant—LBL/Direct feed LAW | 609,924 | 609,924 | |
| 15–D–409 Low activity waste pretreatment system, ORP | 0 | 0 | |
| 01–D–16 D, High-level waste facility | 0 | 0 | |
| 01–D–16 E, Pretreatment Facility | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Construction | 609,924 | 609,924 | |
| ORP Low-level waste offsite disposal | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Office of River Protection | 1,257,681 | 1,257,681 | |
| Idaho National Laboratory: | |||
| Idaho cleanup and waste disposition | 257,554 | 257,554 | |
| ID Excess facilities R&D | 0 | 0 | |
| Idaho community and regulatory support | 2,400 | 2,400 | |
| Total, Idaho National Laboratory | 259,954 | 259,954 | |
| NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites | |||
| Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | 1,764 | 1,764 | |
| LLNL Excess facilities R&D | 0 | 0 | |
| Separations Process Research Unit | 15,000 | 15,000 | |
| Nevada Test Site | 60,737 | 60,737 | |
| Sandia National Laboratories | 4,860 | 4,860 | |
| Los Alamos National Laboratory | 120,000 | 220,000 | |
| Execute achievable scope of work | (100,000) | ||
| Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites | 202,361 | 302,361 | |
| Oak Ridge Reservation: | |||
| OR Nuclear facility D & D | 109,077 | 109,077 | |
| U233 Disposition Program | 45,000 | 45,000 | |
| OR cleanup and waste disposition | 58,000 | 58,000 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 17–D–401 On-site waste disposal facility | 22,380 | 22,380 | |
| 14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility | 20,500 | 20,500 | |
| Subtotal, Construction: | 42,880 | 42,880 | |
| OR community & regulatory support | 4,930 | 4,930 | |
| OR technology development and deployment | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| Total, Oak Ridge Reservation | 262,887 | 262,887 | |
| Savannah River Site: | |||
| Savannah River risk management operations | 455,122 | 455,122 | |
| SR community and regulatory support | 4,989 | 4,989 | |
| Radioactive liquid tank waste: | |||
| Construction: | |||
| 20-D–402 Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative Facility (AMC) | 25,000 | 25,000 | |
| 20-D–401 Saltstone Disposal Unit #10, 11, 12 | 0 | 0 | |
| 19–D–701 SR Security system replacement | 0 | 0 | |
| 18–D–402,Saltstone disposal unit #8/9 | 65,500 | 65,500 | |
| 17–D–402—Saltstone Disposal Unit #7 | 10,716 | 10,716 | |
| 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, SRS | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Construction, Radioactive liquid tank waste | 101,216 | 101,216 | |
| Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization | 970,332 | 970,332 | |
| Total, Savannah River Site | 1,531,659 | 1,531,659 | |
| Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | |||
| Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | 323,260 | 323,260 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 15–D–411 Safety significant confinement ventilation system, WIPP | 0 | 0 | |
| 15–D–412 Exhaust shaft, WIPP | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| 21–D–401 Hoisting Capability Project | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 60,000 | 60,000 | |
| Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | 383,260 | 383,260 | |
| Program direction—Defense Environment Cleanup | 275,285 | 275,285 | |
| Program support—Defense Environment Cleanup | 12,979 | 12,979 | |
| Safeguards and Security—Defense Environment Cleanup | 320,771 | 320,771 | |
| Technology development and deployment | 25,000 | 25,000 | |
| Use of prior year balances | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup | 5,092,608 | 5,192,608 | |
| Rescission: | |||
| Rescission of prior year balances | –109,000 | –109,000 | |
| TOTAL, Defense Environmental Cleanup | 4,983,608 | 5,083,608 | |
| Other Defense Activities | |||
| Environment, health, safety and security | |||
| Environment, health, safety and security mission support | 134,320 | 134,320 | |
| Program direction | 75,368 | 75,368 | |
| Total, Environment, health, safety and security | 209,688 | 209,688 | |
| Independent enterprise assessments | |||
| Enterprise assessments | 26,949 | 26,949 | |
| Program direction—Office of Enterprise Assessments | 54,635 | 54,635 | |
| Total, Office of Enterprise Assessments | 81,584 | 81,584 | |
| Specialized security activities | 258,411 | 258,411 | |
| Office of Legacy Management | |||
| Legacy management activities—defense | 293,873 | 143,873 | |
| Maintain current program administration | (–150,000) | ||
| Program direction | 23,120 | 23,120 | |
| Total, Office of Legacy Management | 316,993 | 166,993 | |
| Defense related administrative support | 183,789 | 183,789 | |
| Office of hearings and appeals | 4,262 | 4,262 | |
| Subtotal, Other defense activities | 1,054,727 | 904,727 | |
| Use of prior year balances | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Other Defense Activities | 1,054,727 | 904,727 | |
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following elements:
(1) An analysis of the warfighting capability currently delivered by the Block I and Block II configurations of H–47 Chinook helicopters.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States shipbuilding and supporting vendor base constitute a national security imperative that is unique and must be protected;
(2) a healthy and efficient industrial base continues to be a fundamental driver for achieving and sustaining a successful shipbuilding procurement strategy;
(b) Limitation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy may not deviate from the 2016 Navy Force Structure Assessment to implement the results of a new force structure assessment or new annual long-range plan for construction of naval vessels that would reduce the requirement for Large Surface Combatants to fewer than 104 such vessels until the date on which the Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense committees the certification under paragraph (2) and the report under subsection (c).
(2) CERTIFICATION.—The certification referred to in paragraph (1) is a certification, in writing, that each of the following conditions have been satisfied:
(c) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(1) a description of likely detrimental impacts to the large surface combatant industrial base and the Navy’s plan to mitigate any such impacts if the fiscal year 2021 future-years defense program were implemented as proposed;
(2) a review of the benefits to the Navy fleet of the new AN/SPY–6 radar to be deployed aboard Flight III variant DDG–51 Destroyers, which are currently under construction, as well as an analysis of impacts to the fleet’s warfighting capabilities, should the number of such destroyers be reduced; and
(3) a plan to fully implement section 131 of the National Defense Authorization for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), including subsystem prototyping efforts and funding by fiscal year.
(a) Establishment.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this title, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall convene an interagency entity (referred to in this title as the “Entity”) under the National Science and Technology Council with the responsibility to coordinate Federal programs and activities in support of sustainable chemistry, including those described in sections __3 and __4.
(b) Coordination with existing groups.—In convening the Entity, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall consider overlap and possible coordination with existing committees, subcommittees, or other groups of the National Science and Technology Council, such as—
(c) Co-chairs.—The Entity shall be co-chaired by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy and a representative from the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Science Foundation, or the Department of Energy, as selected by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
(d) Agency participation.—The Entity shall include representatives, including subject matter experts, from the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Defense, the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, and other related Federal agencies, as appropriate.
(a) Strategic plan.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this title, the Entity shall—
(1) consult with relevant stakeholders, including representatives from industry, academia, national labs, the Federal Government, and international entities, to develop and update, as needed, a consensus definition of “sustainable chemistry” to guide the activities under this title;
(2) develop a working framework of attributes characterizing and metrics for assessing sustainable chemistry, as described in subsection (b);
(3) assess the state of sustainable chemistry in the United States as a key benchmark from which progress under the activities described in this title can be measured, including assessing key sectors of the United States economy, key technology platforms, commercial priorities, and barriers to innovation;
(4) coordinate and support Federal research, development, demonstration, technology transfer, commercialization, education, and training efforts in sustainable chemistry, including budget coordination and support for public-private partnerships, as appropriate;
(5) identify any Federal regulatory barriers to, and opportunities for, Federal agencies facilitating the development of incentives for development, consideration and use of sustainable chemistry processes and products;
(b) Characterizing and assessing sustainable chemistry.—The Entity shall develop a working framework of attributes characterizing and metrics for assessing sustainable chemistry for the purposes of carrying out the title. In developing this framework, the Entity shall—
(2) consider existing definitions of, or frameworks characterizing and metrics for assessing, sustainable chemistry already in use at Federal agencies;
(c) Consultation.—In carrying out the duties described in subsections (a) and (b), the Entity shall consult with stakeholders qualified to provide advice and information to guide Federal activities related to sustainable chemistry through workshops, requests for information, or other mechanisms as necessary. The stakeholders shall include representatives from—
(1) business and industry (including trade associations and small- and medium-sized enterprises from across the value chain);
(2) the scientific community (including the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, scientific professional societies, national labs, and academia);
(d) Report to congress.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Entity shall submit a report to the Committee on Environment and Public Works, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. In addition to the elements described in subsections (a) and (b), the report shall include—
(A) a summary of federally funded, sustainable chemistry research, development, demonstration, technology transfer, commercialization, education, and training activities;
(B) a summary of the financial resources allocated to sustainable chemistry initiatives by each participating agency;
(C) an assessment of the current state of sustainable chemistry in the United States, including the role that Federal agencies are playing in supporting it;
(D) an analysis of the progress made toward achieving the goals and priorities of this Act, and recommendations for future program activities;
(2) SUBMISSION TO GAO.—The Entity shall also submit the report described in paragraph (1) to the Comptroller General of the United States for consideration in future Congressional inquiries.
(3) ADDITIONAL REPORTS.—The Entity shall submit a report to Congress and the Comptroller General of the United States that incorporates the information described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (D), (E), and (F) of paragraph (1) every 3 years, commencing after the initial report is submitted until the Entity terminates.
(a) In general.—The agencies participating in the Entity shall carry out activities in support of sustainable chemistry, as appropriate to the specific mission and programs of each agency.
(b) Activities.—The activities described in subsection (a) shall—
(1) incorporate sustainable chemistry into existing research, development, demonstration, technology transfer, commercialization, education, and training programs, that the agency determines to be relevant, including consideration of—
(A) merit-based competitive grants to individual investigators and teams of investigators, including, to the extent practicable, early career investigators for research and development;
(B) grants to fund collaborative research and development partnerships among universities, industry, and nonprofit organizations;
(C) coordination of sustainable chemistry research, development, demonstration, and technology transfer conducted at Federal laboratories and agencies;
(2) collect and disseminate information on sustainable chemistry research, development, technology transfer, and commercialization, including information on accomplishments and best practices;
(3) expand the education and training of students at appropriate levels of education, professional scientists and engineers, and other professionals involved in all aspects of sustainable chemistry and engineering appropriate to that level of education and training, including through—
(B) support for the integration of sustainable chemistry principles into chemistry and chemical engineering curriculum and research training, as appropriate to that level of education and training; and
(C) support for integration of sustainable chemistry principles into existing or new professional development opportunities for professionals including teachers, faculty, and individuals involved in laboratory research (product development, materials specification and testing, life cycle analysis, and management);
(4) as relevant to an agency’s programs, examine methods by which the Federal agencies, in collaboration and consultation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, may facilitate the development or recognition of validated, standardized tools for performing sustainability assessments of chemistry processes or products;
(5) through programs identified by an agency, support (including through technical assistance, participation, financial support, communications tools, awards, or other forms of support) outreach and dissemination of sustainable chemistry advances such as non-Federal symposia, forums, conferences, and publications in collaboration with, as appropriate, industry, academia, scientific and professional societies, and other relevant groups;
(6) provide for public input and outreach to be integrated into the activities described in this section by the convening of public discussions, through mechanisms such as public meetings, consensus conferences, and educational events, as appropriate;
(7) within each agency, develop or adapt metrics to track the outputs and outcomes of the programs supported by that agency; and
(8) incentivize or recognize actions that advance sustainable chemistry products, processes, or initiatives, including through the establishment of a nationally recognized awards program through the Environmental Protection Agency to identify, publicize, and celebrate innovations in sustainable chemistry and chemical technologies.
(a) In general.—The agencies participating in the Entity may facilitate and support, through financial, technical, or other assistance, the creation of partnerships between institutions of higher education, nongovernmental organizations, consortia, or companies across the value chain in the chemical industry, including small- and medium-sized enterprises, to—
(1) create collaborative sustainable chemistry research, development, demonstration, technology transfer, and commercialization programs; and
(2) train students and retrain professional scientists, engineers, and others involved in materials specification on the use of sustainable chemistry concepts and strategies by methods, including—
(b) Private sector participation.—To be eligible for support under this section, a partnership in sustainable chemistry shall include at least one private sector organization.
(c) Selection of partnerships.—In selecting partnerships for support under this section, the agencies participating in the Entity shall also consider the extent to which the applicants are willing and able to demonstrate evidence of support for, and commitment to, the goals outlined in the strategic plan and report described in section __2.
In carrying out this Act, the Entity shall focus its support for sustainable chemistry activities on those that achieve, to the highest extent practicable, the goals outlined in the title.
Nothing in this title shall be construed to alter or amend any State law or action with regard to sustainable chemistry, as defined by the State.
Section 110 of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act (42 U.S.C. 1862s–2) is amended by striking (g)(2) and inserting the following:
(a) Program improvements generally.—Subsection (a) of section 401 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 7451) is amended—
(3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
“(6) supporting efforts to identify cybersecurity workforce skill gaps in public and private sectors;
(c) Cybersecurity career pathways.—
(1) IDENTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE CYBERSECURITY CAREER PATHWAYS.—In carrying out subsection (a) of such section and not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, use a consultative process with other Federal agencies, academia, and industry to identify multiple career pathways for cybersecurity work roles that can be used in the private and public sectors.
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The Director shall ensure that the multiple cybersecurity career pathways identified under paragraph (1) indicate the knowledge, skills, and abilities, including relevant education, training, apprenticeships, certifications, and other experiences, that—
(3) EXCHANGE PROGRAM.—Consistent with requirements under chapter 37 of title 5, United States Code, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, may establish a voluntary program for the exchange of employees engaged in one of the cybersecurity work roles identified in the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Cybersecurity Workforce Framework (NIST Special Publication 800–181), or successor framework, between the National Institute of Standards and Technology and private sector institutions, including a nonpublic or commercial business, a research institution, or an institution of higher education, as the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology considers feasible.
(d) Proficiency To perform cybersecurity tasks.—Not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security—
(1) in carrying out subsection (a) of such section, assess the scope and sufficiency of efforts to measure a learner's capability to perform specific tasks found in the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Cybersecurity Workforce Framework (NIST Special Publication 800–181) at all proficiency levels; and
(e) Cybersecurity metrics.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(e) Cybersecurity metrics.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Management and Budget may seek input from the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security, the Office of Personnel Management, and such agencies as the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology considers relevant, shall develop repeatable measures and reliable metrics for measuring and evaluating Federally funded cybersecurity workforce programs and initiatives based on the outcomes of such programs and initiatives.”.
(f) Regional alliances and multistakeholder partnerships.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(f) Regional alliances and multistakeholder partnerships.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to section 2(b)(4) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 272(b)(4)), the Director shall establish cooperative agreements between the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) of the Institute and regional alliances or partnerships for cybersecurity education and workforce.
“(2) AGREEMENTS.—The cooperative agreements established under paragraph (1) shall advance the goals of the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education Cybersecurity Workforce Framework (NIST Special Publication 800–181), or successor framework, by facilitating local and regional partnerships—
“(A) to identify the workforce needs of the local economy and classify such workforce in accordance with such framework;
“(3) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—
“(A) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Director may award financial assistance to a regional alliance or partnership with whom the Director enters into a cooperative agreement under paragraph (1) in order to assist the regional alliance or partnership in carrying out the term of the cooperative agreement.
“(B) AMOUNT OF ASSISTANCE.—The aggregate amount of financial assistance awarded under subparagraph (A) per cooperative agreement shall not exceed $200,000.
“(C) MATCHING REQUIREMENT.—The Director may not award financial assistance to a regional alliance or partnership under subparagraph (A) unless the regional alliance or partnership agrees that, with respect to the costs to be incurred by the regional alliance or partnership in carrying out the cooperative agreement for which the assistance was awarded, the regional alliance or partnership will make available (directly or through donations from public or private entities) non-Federal contributions in an amount equal to 50 percent of Federal funds provided under the award.
“(4) APPLICATION.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—A regional alliance or partnership seeking to enter into a cooperative agreement under paragraph (1) and receive financial assistance under paragraph (3) shall submit to the Director an application therefore at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Director may require.
“(B) REQUIREMENTS.—Each application submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
“(i) (I) A plan to establish (or identification of, if it already exists) a multistakeholder workforce partnership that includes—
“(II) Participation from Federal Cyber Scholarships for Service organizations, advanced technological education programs, elementary and secondary schools, training and certification providers, State and local governments, economic development organizations, or other community organizations is encouraged.
“(ii) A description of how the workforce partnership would identify the workforce needs of the local economy.
“(iii) A description of how the multistakeholder workforce partnership would leverage the programs and objectives of the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education, such as the Cybersecurity Workforce Framework and the strategic plan of such initiative.
“(iv) A description of how employers in the community will be recruited to support internships, externships, apprenticeships, or cooperative education programs in conjunction with providers of education and training. Inclusion of programs that seek to include women, minorities, or veterans is encouraged.
“(C) PRIORITY CONSIDERATION.—In awarding financial assistance under paragraph (3)(A), the Director shall give priority consideration to a regional alliance or partnership that includes an institution of higher education which receives an award under the Federal Cyber Scholarship for Service program located in the State or region of the regional alliance or partnership.
“(5) AUDITS.—Each cooperative agreement for which financial assistance is awarded under paragraph (3) shall be subject to audit requirements under part 200 of title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (relating to uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for Federal awards), or successor regulation.
“(6) REPORTS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Upon completion of a cooperative agreement under paragraph (1), the regional alliance or partnership that participated in the agreement shall submit to the Director a report on the activities of the regional alliance or partnership under the agreement, which may include training and education outcomes.
(g) Transfer of section.—
(1) TRANSFER.—Such section is transferred to the end of title III of such Act and redesignated as section 303.
(4) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(A) Section 302(3) of the Federal Cybersecurity Workforce Assessment Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–113) is amended by striking “under section 401 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 7451)” and inserting “under section 303 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–274)”.
(B) Section 2(c)(3) of the NIST Small Business Cybersecurity Act (Public Law 115–236) is amended by striking “under section 401 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 7451)” and inserting “under section 303 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–274)”.
(C) Section 302(f) of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 7442(f)) is amended by striking “under section 401” and inserting “under section 303”.
(a) In general.—Section 20(a) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278g–3(a)) is amended—
(b) Publication of standards and guidelines on cybersecurity awareness.—Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act and pursuant to section 20 of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278g–3), the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall publish standards and guidelines for improving cybersecurity awareness of employees and contractors of Federal agencies.
Section 302 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 7442) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)—
(A) in paragraph (2), by striking “information technology” and inserting “information technology and cybersecurity”;
(B) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
“(3) prioritize the placement of scholarship recipients fulfilling the post-award employment obligation under this section to ensure that—
“(A) not less than 70 percent of such recipients are placed in an executive agency (as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code);
(C) in paragraph (4), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting “, including by seeking to provide awards in coordination with other relevant agencies for summer cybersecurity camp or other experiences, including teacher training, in each of the 50 States,” after “cybersecurity education”;
Section 302 of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 7442) is amended—
(1) in subsection (f)—
(2) in subsection (g)—
(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting “the Office of Personnel Management, in coordination with the National Science Foundation, and” before “the qualified institution”;
(3) in subsection (h)(2), by inserting “and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management” after “Foundation”;
(4) in subsection (k)(1)(A), by striking “and the Director” and all that follows and inserting “, the Director of the National Science Foundation, and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management of the amounts owed; and”; and
(5) in subsection (m)(2), by striking “once every 3 years” and all that follows and inserting “once every 2 years, to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology and the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives a report, including—”
(a) Computer science and cybersecurity education research.—Section 310 of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act (42 U.S.C. 1862s–7) is amended—
(b) Scientific and technical education.—Section 3(j)(9) of the Scientific and Advanced-Technology Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 1862i(j)(9)) is amended by inserting “and cybersecurity” after “computer science”.
(c) Low-Income scholarship program.—Section 414(d) of the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (42 U.S.C. 1869c) is amended—
(d) Scholarships and graduate fellowships.—The Director of the National Science Foundation shall ensure that students pursuing master's degrees and doctoral degrees in fields relating to cybersecurity are considered as applicants for scholarships and graduate fellowships under the Graduate Research Fellowship Program under section 10 of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (42 U.S.C. 1869).
(e) Presidential awards for teaching excellence.—The Director of the National Science Foundation shall ensure that educators and mentors in fields relating to cybersecurity can be considered for—
(1) Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching made under section 117 of the National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. 1881b); and
(2) Presidential Awards for Excellence in STEM Mentoring administered under section 307 of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act (42 U.S.C. 1862s–6).
In carrying out any STEM education program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (referred to in this section as “NASA”), including a program of the Office of STEM Engagement, the Administrator of NASA shall, to the maximum extent practicable, encourage the inclusion of cybersecurity education opportunities in such program.
(a) University transportation centers program.—Section 5505 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(2)(C), by inserting “in the matters described in subparagraphs (A) through (G) of section 6503(c)(1)” after “transportation leaders”; and
(2) in subsection (c)(3)(E)—
(A) by inserting “, including the cybersecurity implications of technologies relating to connected vehicles, connected infrastructure, and autonomous vehicles” after “autonomous vehicles”; and
(a) In general.—Title II of the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014 (15 U.S.C. 7431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 205. National Cybersecurity Challenges.
“(a) Establishment of national cybersecurity challenges.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—To achieve high-priority breakthroughs in cybersecurity by 2028, the Secretary of Commerce shall establish the following national cybersecurity challenges:
“(A) ECONOMICS OF A CYBER ATTACK.—Building more resilient systems that measurably and exponentially raise adversary costs of carrying out common cyber attacks.
“(B) CYBER TRAINING.—
“(C) EMERGING TECHNOLOGY.—Advancing cybersecurity efforts in response to emerging technology, such as artificial intelligence, quantum science, and next generation communications technologies.
“(b) Pursuit of national cybersecurity challenges.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology, shall commence efforts to pursue the national cybersecurity challenges established under subsection (a).
“(2) COMPETITIONS.—The efforts required by paragraph (1) shall include carrying out programs to award prizes, including cash and noncash prizes, competitively pursuant to the authorities and processes established under section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719) or any other applicable provision of law.
“(3) ADDITIONAL AUTHORITIES.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary may enter into and perform such other transactions as the Secretary considers necessary and on such terms as the Secretary considers appropriate.
“(4) COORDINATION.—In pursuing national cybersecurity challenges under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall coordinate with the following:
“(5) SOLICITATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719), the Secretary shall request and accept funds from other Federal agencies, State, United States territory, local, or tribal government agencies, private sector for-profit entities, and nonprofit entities to support efforts to pursue a national cybersecurity challenge under this section.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Federal working group.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convene a working group of Federal stakeholders for the purpose of providing recommendations and a report to Congress relating to the aspects of the Internet of Things described in paragraph (2).
(2) DUTIES.—The working group shall—
(A) identify any Federal regulations, statutes, grant practices, budgetary or jurisdictional challenges, and other sector-specific policies that are inhibiting, or could inhibit, the development or deployment of the Internet of Things;
(B) consider policies or programs that encourage and improve coordination among Federal agencies that have responsibilities that are relevant to the objectives of this section;
(C) consider any findings or recommendations made by the steering committee and, where appropriate, act to implement those recommendations;
(D) examine—
(ii) the use of Internet of Things technology by Federal agencies as of the date on which the working group performs the examination;
(iii) the preparedness and ability of Federal agencies to adopt Internet of Things technology as of the date on which the working group performs the examination and in the future; and
(3) AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES.—In convening the working group under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall have discretion to appoint representatives from Federal agencies and departments as appropriate and shall specifically consider seeking representation from—
(4) NONGOVERNMENTAL STAKEHOLDERS.—The working group shall consult with nongovernmental stakeholders with expertise relating to the Internet of Things, including—
(B) information and communications technology manufacturers, suppliers, service providers, and vendors;
(5) STEERING COMMITTEE.—
(A) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established within the Department of Commerce a steering committee to advise the working group.
(B) DUTIES.—The steering committee shall advise the working group with respect to—
(i) the identification of any Federal regulations, statutes, grant practices, programs, budgetary or jurisdictional challenges, and other sector-specific policies that are inhibiting, or could inhibit, the development of the Internet of Things;
(ii) situations in which the use of the Internet of Things is likely to deliver significant and scalable economic and societal benefits to the United States, including benefits from or to—
(iii) whether adequate spectrum is available to support the growing Internet of Things and what legal or regulatory barriers may exist to providing any spectrum needed in the future;
(iv) policies, programs, or multi-stakeholder activities that—
(I) promote or are related to the privacy of individuals who use or are affected by the Internet of Things;
(C) MEMBERSHIP.—The Secretary shall appoint to the steering committee members representing a wide range of stakeholders outside of the Federal Government with expertise relating to the Internet of Things, including—
(i) information and communications technology manufacturers, suppliers, service providers, and vendors;
(D) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the steering committee shall submit to the working group a report that includes any findings or recommendations of the steering committee.
(E) INDEPENDENT ADVICE.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The steering committee shall set the agenda of the steering committee in carrying out the duties of the steering committee under subparagraph (B).
(6) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the working group shall submit to Congress a report that includes—
(i) the findings and recommendations of the working group with respect to the duties of the working group under paragraph (2);
(ii) the report submitted by the steering committee under paragraph (5)(D), as the report was received by the working group;
(c) Assessing spectrum needs.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission, in consultation with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, shall issue a notice of inquiry seeking public comment on the current, as of the date of enactment of this Act, and future spectrum needs to enable better connectivity relating to the Internet of Things.
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—In issuing the notice of inquiry under paragraph (1), the Commission shall seek comments that consider and evaluate—
(A) whether adequate spectrum is available, or is planned for allocation, for commercial wireless services that could support the growing Internet of Things;
(B) if adequate spectrum is not available for the purposes described in subparagraph (A), how to ensure that adequate spectrum is available for increased demand with respect to the Internet of Things;
(3) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report summarizing the comments submitted in response to the notice of inquiry issued under paragraph (1).
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the role of the Department of Defense in the development of artificial intelligence standards.
(b) Contents.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of each of the following:
(1) The need for the Department of Defense to develop an artificial intelligence standards strategy.
(3) The ways in which an artificial intelligence standards strategy will improve the national security.
The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall conduct a study to assess the feasibility and advisability of establishing a program office to coordinate energetics research and to ensure a robust and sustained energetics material enterprise.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Reports on digital content forgery technology.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 5 years, the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall produce a report on the state of digital content forgery technology.
(2) CONTENTS.—Each report produced under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) an assessment of the underlying technologies used to create or propagate digital content forgeries, including the evolution of such technologies;
(B) a description of the types of digital content forgeries, including those used to commit fraud, cause harm, or violate civil rights recognized under Federal law;
(C) an assessment of how foreign governments, and the proxies and networks thereof, use, or could use, digital content forgeries to harm national security;
(D) an assessment of how non-governmental entities in the United States use, or could use, digital content forgeries;
(E) an assessment of the uses, applications, dangers, and benefits of deep learning technologies used to generate high fidelity artificial content of events that did not occur, including the impact on individuals;
(F) an analysis of the methods used to determine whether content is genuinely created by a human or through digital content forgery technology and an assessment of any effective heuristics used to make such a determination, as well as recommendations on how to identify and address suspect content and elements to provide warnings to users of the content;
(3) CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS.—In producing each report required under paragraph (1), the Secretary may—
(4) FORM OF REPORT.—Each report required under paragraph (1) shall be produced in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(5) APPLICABILITY OF FOIA.—Nothing in this section, or in a report produced under this section, shall be construed to allow the disclosure of information or a record that is exempt from public disclosure under section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the “Freedom of Information Act”).
(6) APPLICABILITY OF THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT.—Subchapter I of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code (commonly known as the “Paperwork Reduction Act”), shall not apply to this section.
Subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Requirement of comprehensive review.—In order to strengthen the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall conduct a comprehensive review of the ability of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to fulfill—
(2) the recommendations detailed in the report issued by the Cyberspace Solarium Commission under section 1652(k) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232).
(b) Elements of review.—The review conducted under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1) An assessment of how additional budget resources could be used by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for projects and programs that—
(2) A comprehensive force structure assessment of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency including—
(A) a determination of the appropriate size and composition of personnel to accomplish the mission of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, as well as the recommendations detailed in the report issued by the Cyberspace Solarium Commission under section 1652(k) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232);
(B) an assessment of whether existing personnel are appropriately matched to the prioritization of threats in the cyber domain and risks in critical infrastructure;
(C) an assessment of whether the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has the appropriate personnel and resources to—
(i) perform risk assessments, threat hunting, incident response to support both private and public cybersecurity;
(a) Review.—The Administrator of the General Services Administration shall—
(1) conduct a review of current Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency facilities and assess the suitability of such facilities to fully support current and projected mission requirements nationally and regionally; and
(2) make recommendations regarding resources needed to procure or build a new facility or augment existing facilities to ensure sufficient size and accommodations to fully support current and projected mission requirements, including the integration of personnel from the private sector and other departments and agencies.
(a) Requirement.—Section 2679 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):
“(d) Use of cost savings realized.— (1) With respect to a fiscal year in which cost savings are realized as a result of entering into an intergovernmental support agreement under this section for a military installation, the Secretary concerned shall make not less than 25 percent of the amount of such savings available for use by the commander of the installation solely for sustainment restoration and modernization requirements that have been approved by the major subordinate command or equivalent component.
“(2) Not less frequently than annually, the Secretary concerned shall certify to the congressional defense committee the amount of the cost savings achieved, the source and type of intergovernmental support agreement that achieved the savings, and the manner in which those savings were deployed, disaggregated by installation.”.
(a) In general.—Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the ability of each combatant command to conduct all-weather, day-night airfield operations in a non-permissive, global positioning system denied environment.
(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) An assessment of current air traffic control and landing systems at existing airfields and contingency airfields.
(2) An assessment of the ability of each combatant command to conduct all-weather, day-night airfield flight operations in a non-permissive, global positioning system denied environment at existing and contingency airfields, including aircraft tracking and precision landing.
(a) Increase of base operations and support.—The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for operation and maintenance for the Marine Corps, is hereby increased by $47,600,000, with the amount of the increase to be available for base operations and support (SAG BSS1).
(b) Offsets.—
(1) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for operation and maintenance for the Marine Corps, is hereby reduced by $4,700,000, with the amount of the reduction to be derived from SAG 1A1A.
(a) Increase in O&M, Defense-wide activities.—The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 by section 301 is hereby increased by $2,000,000, with the amount of the increase to be available for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide activities, for SAG 4GTN Office of the Secretary of Defense for modernization of the congressional reports process.
(b) Offset.—The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 by section 301 is hereby decreased by $2,000,000, with the amount of the decrease to be applied against amounts available for operation and maintenance, Army, for SAG 421 for Servicewide Transportation for historical underexecution.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth a comprehensive plan to implement and accomplish the recommendations for the Department of Defense in keeping with the May 2020 report of the Government Accountability Office titled “Female Active-Duty Personnel: Guidance and Plans Needed for Recruitment and Retention Efforts”, namely the recommendations as follows:
(1) The Secretary of Defense must ensure that the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness provides guidance to each of the Armed Forces to develop plans, with clearly defined goals, performance measures, and timeframes, to guide and monitor the efforts in connection with the recruitment and retention of female members.
(2) Each Secretary of a military department must develop a plan, with clearly defined goals, performance measures, and timeframes, to guide and monitor the efforts of each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary in connection with the recruitment and retention of female members in such Armed Force.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the regulations and other procedures prescribed by the Secretaries of the military departments in order to implement and carry out the programs of the military departments on the award of medals or other commendations to handlers of military working dogs required by section 582 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1787; 10 U.S.C. 1121 note prec.).
(a) Independent study.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a Federally funded research and development center to conduct a study on underemployment among military spouses. The study shall consider, at a minimum, the following:
(b) Submittal to DoD.—Not later than 240 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federally funded research and development center with which the Secretary contracts pursuant to subsection (a) shall submit to the Secretary a report containing the results of the study conducted pursuant to that subsection.
(c) Transmittal to Congress.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to the appropriate committees of Congress the report under subsection (b), without change.
(d) Appropriate committees of congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means the following—
Section 593 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall brief Congress on the current status of the implementation of the requirements of section 570F of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92; 133 Stat. 1401; 10 U.S.C. 1142 note), relating to connections of retiring and separating members of the Armed Forces with community-based organizations and related entities.
(b) Pilot programs authorized.—The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force may each, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, conduct a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of the development of a capability within the National Guard through which a National Guard of a State remotely provides State governments and National Guards of other States (whether or not in the same Armed Force as the providing National Guard) with cybersecurity technical assistance in training, preparation, and response to cyber incidents. If such Secretary elects to conduct such a pilot program, such Secretary shall be known as an “administering Secretary” for purposes of this section, and any reference in this section to “the pilot program” shall be treated as a reference to the pilot program conducted by such Secretary.
(c) Assessment prior to commencement.—For purposes of evaluating existing platforms, technologies, and capabilities under subsection (d), and for establishing eligibility and participation requirements under subsection (d), for purposes of the pilot program, an administering Secretary, in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, shall, prior to commencing the pilot program—
(d) Elements.—A pilot program under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1) A technical capability that enables the National Guard of a State to remotely provide cybersecurity technical assistance to State governments and National Guards of other States, without the need to deploy outside its home State.
(2) Policies, processes, procedures, and authorities for use of such a capability, including with respect to the following:
(A) The roles and responsibilities of both requesting and deploying State governments and National Guards with respect to such technical assistance, taking into account the matters specified in subsection (g).
(3) The conduct, in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, other Federal agencies, and appropriate non-Federal entities, of at least one exercise to demonstrate the capability, which exercise shall include the following:
(e) Use of existing technology.—An administering Secretary may use an existing platform, technology, or capability to provide the capability described in subsection (b) under the pilot program.
(f) Eligibility and participation requirements.—An administering Secretary shall, in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, establish requirements with respect to eligibility and participation of State governments and their National Guards in the pilot program.
(g) Construction with certain current authorities.—
(h) Evaluation metrics.—An administering Secretary shall, in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Secretary of Homeland Security, establish metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of the pilot program.
(i) Term.—A pilot program under subsection (b) shall terminate on the date that is three years after the date of the commencement of the pilot program.
(j) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the commencement of the pilot program, the administering Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a description of the pilot program and such other matters in connection with the pilot program as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the termination of the pilot program, the administering Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the pilot program. The report shall include the following:
(A) A description of the pilot program, including any partnerships entered into by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau under the pilot program.
(B) A summary of the assessment performed prior to the commencement of the pilot program in accordance with subsection (c).
(D) An assessment of the effectiveness of the pilot program, and of the capability described in subsection (b) under the pilot program.
(F) A recommendation as to the termination or extension of the pilot program, or the making of the pilot program permanent with an expansion nationwide.
The reference in section 707(c) to section 1074g(a)(9)(C)(i) of title 10, United States Code, is deemed to be a reference to section 1074g(a)(9)(C)(ii) of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Study.—The Director of the Defense Health Agency shall conduct a study on the use, scalability, and military requirements for commercial off the shelf negative air pressure room containment systems in order to improve pandemic preparedness at military medical treatment facilities worldwide, to include an assessment of whether such systems would improve the readiness of the Department of Defense to expand capability and capacity to evaluate and treat patients at such facilities during a pandemic.
Not later than September 30, 2021, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to congressional defense committees—
Not later than September 30, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report evaluating the effect of the Defense Manufacturing Communities Support Program on the defense supply chain. The evaluation should consider the program’s effect on—
Section 803(d)(2) is deemed amended as follows:
Section 808 is deemed to include at the end the following:
“(h) Sense of Congress on mitigating risks of reliance on certain sources of supply and manufacturing for printed circuit boards.—It is the sense of Congress that—
During the national emergency declared under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) with respect to the coronavirus disease 2019 (commonly referred to as “COVID–19”), the Secretary of Defense may waive section 2307(e)(2) of title 10, United States Code, with respect to progress payments for any undefinitized contract.
Section 15(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(1) by inserting after the first sentence the following: “If the Government Accountability Office has determined that a Federal agency is not in compliance with all of the requirements under this subsection, the Federal agency shall, not later than 120 days after that determination or 120 days after the date of enactment of this sentence, whichever is later, submit to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives a report that includes the reasons why the Federal agency is not in compliance and the specific actions that the Federal agency will take to comply with the requirements under this subsection.”; and
The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 21(a) (15 U.S.C. 648(a))—
(2) in section 34(a)(9) (15 U.S.C. 657d(a)(9)), by striking “and American Samoa” and inserting “American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands”.
(a) In general.—Section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (15) the following:
“(16) DISASTER DECLARATION IN RURAL AREAS.—
“(A) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph—
“(B) DISASTER DECLARATION.—Notwithstanding section 123.3(a) of title 13, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulation, the Administrator may declare a disaster in a rural area for which a major disaster was declared by the President under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) if—
“(C) SBA REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and every year thereafter, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives a report on, with respect to the 1-year period preceding submission of the report—
“(i) any economic injury that resulted from a major disaster declared by the President under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) in a rural area;
(b) Regulations.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall issue regulations to carry out the amendment made by subsection (a).
(c) GAO report.—
(1) DEFINITION OF RURAL AREA.—In this subsection, the term “rural area” means an area with a population of less than 200,000 outside an urbanized area.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives a report on—
(A) any unique challenges that communities in rural areas face compared to communities in metropolitan areas when seeking to obtain disaster assistance under section 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)); and
The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall allow a small business concern (as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) participating in the program established under section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)) on the date of enactment of this section to extend such participation by a period of 1 year.
The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 8 (15 U.S.C. 637)—
(2) in section 31(c)(2)(A)(ii)(I) (15 U.S.C. 657a(c)(2)(A)(ii)(I)), by striking “$5,000,000” and inserting “$7,000,000”; and
(3) in section 36(a)(2)(A) (15 U.S.C. 657f(a)(2)(A)), by striking “$5,000,000” and inserting “$7,000,000”.
(a) Definitions.—In this section—
(1) the term “SBIR” has the meaning given the term in section 9(e)(4) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(e)(4)); and
(b) Reports required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and not later than 120 days after the end of each fiscal year that begins after that date of enactment, the Secretary, after consultation with the Secretary of each branch of the Armed Forces, shall submit, through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, to Congress a report that addresses—
(1) the ways in which the Secretary, as of the date on which the report is submitted, is using incentives to Department of Defense program managers under section 9(y)(6)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(y)(6)(B)) to increase the number of Phase II SBIR contracts awarded by the Secretary that lead to technology transition into programs of record or fielded systems, which shall include the judgment of the Secretary regarding the potential effect of providing monetary incentives to those officers for that purpose;
(2) the extent to which the Department of Defense has developed simplified and standardized procedures and model contracts throughout the agency for Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III SBIR awards, as required under section 9(hh)(2)(A)(i) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(hh)(2)(A)(i));
(3) with respect to each report submitted under this section after the submission of the first such report, the extent to which any incentives described in this section and implemented by the Secretary have resulted in an increased number of Phase II contracts under the SBIR program of the Department of Defense leading to technology transition into programs of record or fielded systems;
(4) the extent to which Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III projects under the SBIR program of the Department of Defense align with the modernization priorities of the Department, including with respect to artificial intelligence, biotechnology, autonomy, cybersecurity, directed energy, fully networked command, control, and communication systems, microelectronics, quantum science, hypersonics, and space; and
Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(10) NONPROFIT CHILD CARE PROVIDERS.—
“(A) DEFINITION.—In this paragraph, the term ‘covered nonprofit child care provider’ means an organization—
“(i) that—
“(I) is in compliance with licensing requirements for child care providers of the State in which the organization is located;
“(II) is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code; and
“(ii) for which each employee and regular volunteer complies with the criminal background check requirements under section 658H(b) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858f(b)); and
“(B) ELIGIBILITY FOR LOAN PROGRAMS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, a covered nonprofit child care provider shall be deemed to be a small business concern for purposes of any program under this Act or the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) under which—
Beginning not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall maintain on the government-wide point of entry for contracting opportunities, Beta.SAM.gov (or any successor system), a list of the consortia used by the Department of Defense to announce or otherwise make available contracting opportunities using other transaction authority (OTA).
(a) In general.—Not later than March 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report recommending the disposition of provisions of law found in the notes to the following sections of title 10, United States Code:
(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include—
(1) for each provision of law included as a note to a section listed in such subsection, a recommendation whether such provision—
(c) Technical corrections.— (1) Section 2362(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering” both places it appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering”.
(2) Section 804(c) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics,” and inserting “The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
Section 887 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115 –91; 22 U.S.C. 2761 note) is amended—
(a) Compliance assessment.—Subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of section 847(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
(b) Additional requirements for responsibility determinations.—Subparagraph (B) of such paragraph is amended—
(c) Timelines and milestones for implementation.—
(1) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a plan and schedule for implementation of the requirements of section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), including—
(2) REVISION OF REGULATIONS, DIRECTIVES, GUIDANCE, TRAINING, AND POLICIES.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise relevant directives, guidance, training, and policies, including revising the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement as needed, to fully implement section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), as amended by this section.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on vulnerabilities in connection with the provision of services by offshore technical support call centers to the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(a) Reports required.—Not later than April 1 of each of 2021 through 2025, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on improving the following:
(1) Modernization of covered materials, including the following:
The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than 30 days after submission of the budget justification documents submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2022 (as submitted pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code), a report that includes the following:
(1) A description of the manner in which amounts requested for the Air Force in the budget for fiscal year 2022 support Air Force operations in the Arctic.
(2) A list of the procurement initiatives and research, development, test, and evaluation initiatives funded by that budget that are primarily intended to enhance the ability of the Air Force to deploy to or operate in the Arctic region, or to defend the northern approach to the United States homeland.
(3) An assessment of the adequacy of the infrastructure of Air Force installations in Alaska and in the States along the northern border of the continental United States to support deployments to and operations in the Arctic region, including an assessment of runways, fuel lines, and aircraft maintenance capacity for purposes of such support.
Section 3105 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(f) (1) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the Secretary shall provide each State, as digital or other electronically searchable forms become available (including digital images), with sufficient information to identify the registered owner of any applicable savings bond with a registration address that is within such State, including the serial number of the bond, the name and registered address of such owner, and any registered beneficiaries.
“(2) The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations or other guidance as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subsection, including rules to—
(b) In general.—Prior to a decision for basing a major weapon system or an additional military unit comparable to or larger than a battalion, squadron, or naval combatant for permanent basing to a host nation with at-risk 5th generation (5G) or sixth generation (6G) wireless network equipment, software, and services, including the use of telecommunications equipment, software, and services provided by vendors such as Huawei and ZTE, where United States military personnel and their families will be directly connected or subscribers to networks that include such at-risk equipment, software, and services in their official duties or in the conduct of personal affairs, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a certification to Congress that includes—
(2) a description of steps being taken by the host nation to mitigate any potential risks to the weapon systems, military units, or personnel, and the Department of Defense’s assessment of those efforts;
(c) Applicability.—The conditions in subsection (b) apply to the permanent long-term stationing of equipment and personnel, and do not apply to short-term deployments or rotational presence to military installations outside the United States in connection with exercises, dynamic force employment, contingency operations, or combat operations.
(d) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains an assessment of—
(a) Short title.—This section may be cited as the “Elijah E. Cummings Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Act of 2020”.
(b) Sense of Congress.—Section 102 of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended—
(c) Notification of violation.—Section 202 of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(d) Notification of final agency action.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which an event described in paragraph (2) occurs with respect to a finding of discrimination (including retaliation), the head of the Federal agency subject to the finding shall provide notice—
“(2) EVENTS DESCRIBED.—An event described in this paragraph is any of the following:
“(A) All appeals of a final action by a Federal agency involving a finding of discrimination (including retaliation) prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a) have been exhausted.
(d) Reporting requirements.—
(1) ELECTRONIC FORMAT REQUIREMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 203(a) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(B) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subparagraph (A)(iii) shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.
(C) TRANSITION PERIOD.—Notwithstanding the requirements of section 203(a) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note), the report required under such section 203(a) may be submitted in an electronic format, as prescribed by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending on the effective date in subparagraph (B).
(2) REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION.—Section 203 of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(c) Disciplinary action report.—Not later than 120 days after the date on which a Federal agency takes final action, or a Federal agency receives a final decision issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, involving a finding of discrimination (including retaliation) in violation of a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a), as applicable, the applicable Federal agency shall submit to the Commission a report stating—
(e) Data to be posted by employing Federal agencies.—Section 301(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended—
(f) Data to be posted by the equal employment opportunity commission.—Section 302(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by striking “(10)” and inserting “(11)”.
(g) Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 amendments.—
(1) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—Title II of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 207. Complaint tracking.
“Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Elijah E. Cummings Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Act of 2019, each Federal agency shall establish a system to track each complaint of discrimination arising under section 2302(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, and adjudicated through the Equal Employment Opportunity process from the filing of a complaint with the Federal agency to resolution of the complaint, including whether a decision has been made regarding disciplinary action as the result of a finding of discrimination.
“SEC. 208. Notation in personnel record.
“If a Federal agency takes an adverse action covered under section 7512 of title 5, United States Code, against a Federal employee for an act of discrimination (including retaliation) prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a), the agency shall, after all appeals relating to that action have been exhausted, include a notation of the adverse action and the reason for the action in the personnel record of the employee.”.
(2) PROCESSING AND REFERRAL.—The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 401. Processing and resolution of complaints.
“Each Federal agency shall—
“(1) be responsible for the fair and impartial processing and resolution of complaints of employment discrimination (including retaliation) prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a); and
“(2) establish a model Equal Employment Opportunity Program that—
“(A) is not under the control, either structurally or practically, of the agency’s Office of Human Capital or Office of the General Counsel (or the equivalent);
“SEC. 402. No limitation on advice or counsel.
“Nothing in this title shall prevent a Federal agency or a subcomponent of a Federal agency, or the Department of Justice, from providing advice or counsel to employees of that agency (or subcomponent, as applicable) in the resolution of a complaint.
“SEC. 403. Head of Program supervised by head of agency.
“The head of each Federal agency’s Equal Employment Opportunity Program shall report directly to the head of the agency.
“SEC. 404. Referrals of findings of discrimination.
“(a) EEOC findings of discrimination.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (referred to in this section as the ‘Commission’) receives, or should have received, a Federal agency report required under section 203(c), the Commission may refer the matter to which the report relates to the Office of Special Counsel if the Commission determines that the Federal agency did not take appropriate action with respect to the finding that is the subject of the report.
“(b) Referrals to special counsel.—The Office of Special Counsel shall accept and review a referral from the Commission under subsection (a)(1) for purposes of pursuing disciplinary action under the authority of the Office against a Federal employee who commits an act of discrimination (including retaliation).
“(c) Notification.—The Office of Special Counsel shall notify the Commission and the applicable Federal agency in a case in which—
“(d) Special counsel approval.—A Federal agency may not take disciplinary action against a Federal employee for an alleged act of discrimination (including retaliation) referred by the Commission under this section, except in accordance with the requirements of section 1214(f) of title 5, United States Code.”.
(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended—
(h) Nondisclosure agreement limitation.—Section 2302(b)(13) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(2) in subparagraph (A), as so designated, by inserting “or the Office of Special Counsel” after “Inspector General”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
“(B) prohibits or restricts an employee or applicant for employment from disclosing to Congress, the Special Counsel, the Inspector General of an agency, or any other agency component responsible for internal investigation or review any information that relates to any violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or any other whistleblower protection; or”.
(a) Progress report on maritime security.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, and the heads of other appropriate Federal agencies, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the steps taken since December 20, 2019, to make further use of the following mechanisms to combat IUU fishing:
(A) Inclusion of counter-IUU fishing in existing shiprider agreements to which the United States is a party.
(B) Entry into shiprider agreements that include counter-IUU fishing with priority flag states and countries in priority regions with which the United States does not already have such agreements.
(2) ELEMENT.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include a description of specific steps taken by the Secretary of the Navy with respect to each mechanism described in paragraph (1), including a detailed description of any security cooperation engagement undertaken to combat IUU fishing by such mechanisms and resulting coordination between the Department of the Navy and the Coast Guard.
(b) Assessment of service coordination on maritime domain awareness.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall enter into an agreement with the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, to assess the available commercial solutions for collecting, sharing, and disseminating among United States maritime services and partner countries maritime domain awareness information relating to illegal maritime activities, including IUU fishing.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment carried out pursuant to an agreement under paragraph (1) shall—
(C) consider any limitation related to affordability, exportability, maintenance, and sustainment requirements and any other factor that may constrain the suitability of such solutions for use in a joint and combined environment, including the potential provision of such solutions to one or more partner countries.
(3) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than one year after entering into an agreement under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Natural Resources, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives the assessment prepared in accordance with the agreement.
(c) Report on use of fishing fleets by foreign governments.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Naval Intelligence shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Natural Resources, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report on the use by governments of foreign countries of distant-water fishing fleets as extensions of the official maritime security forces of such countries.
(2) ELEMENT.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An analysis of the manner in which fishing fleets are leveraged in support of the naval operations and policies of foreign countries more generally.
(d) Definitions.—In this section, any term that is also used in the Maritime SAFE Act (Public Law 116–92) shall have the meaning given such term in that Act.
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a description of the plans of the Navy to prepare for and respond to future pandemics, including future outbreaks of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19). The report shall include a written description of plans, including any necessary corresponding budgetary actions, for the following:
(1) Efforts to prevent and mitigate the impacts of future pandemics at both private and public shipyards, and to protect the health and safety of both military personnel and civilian workers at such shipyards.
(2) Protocol and mitigation strategies once an outbreak of a highly contagious illness occurs aboard a Navy vessel while underway.
The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, shall—
(1) conduct a study that examines, for each type or classification of diabetes (including type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, and other conditions causing reliance on insulin), the effect of the affordability of insulin on—
(C) downstream impacts of insulin adherence, including rates of dialysis treatment and end-stage renal disease;
(D) spending by Federal health programs on acute episodes that could have been averted by adhering to an insulin prescription; and
(E) other factors, as appropriate, to understand the impacts of insulin affordability on health outcomes, Federal Government spending (including under the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) and the Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.)), and insured and uninsured individuals with diabetes; and
(a) Authorization.—The Society of the First Infantry Division may make modifications to the First Division Monument located on Federal land in President's Park in the District of Columbia to honor the dead of the First Infantry Division, United States Forces, in—
(b) Modifications.—Modifications to the First Division Monument may include construction of additional plaques and stone plinths on which to put plaques.
(c) Applicability of commemorative works act.—Chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the “Commemorative Works Act”), shall apply to the design and placement of the commemorative elements authorized by this section, except that subsections (b) and (c) of section 8903 shall not apply.
Section 1083 is deemed to include at the end the following:
“(d) Distribution of estimate.—As soon as practicable after submitting an estimate as described in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) and making the certification described in paragraph (2) of such subsection, the Secretary shall make such estimate available to any licensee operating under the order and authorization described in such subsection.
“(e) Authority of secretary of defense to seek recovery of costs.—The Secretary of Defense may work directly with any licensee (or any future assignee, successor, or purchaser) affected by the Order and Authorization adopted by the Federal Communications Commission on April 19, 2020 (FCC 20–48) to seek recovery of costs incurred by the Department of Defense as a result of the effect of such order and authorization.
“(f) Reimbursement.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish and facilitate a process for any licensee (or any future assignee, successor, or purchaser) subject to the authorization and order described in subsection (a) to provide reimbursement to the Department of Defense, only to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, for the covered costs and eligible reimbursable costs submitted and certified to the congressional defense committees under such subsection.
(a) Reauthorization of diesel emissions reduction program.—Section 797(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16137(a)) is amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2024”.
(b) Recognizing differences in diesel vehicle, engine, equipment, and fleet use.—
(1) NATIONAL GRANT, REBATE, AND LOAN PROGRAMS.—Section 792(c)(4)(D) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16132(c)(4)(D)) is amended by inserting “, recognizing differences in typical vehicle, engine, equipment, and fleet use throughout the United States” before the semicolon.
(2) STATE GRANT, REBATE, AND LOAN PROGRAMS.—Section 793(b)(1) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16133(b)(1)) is amended—
(c) Reallocation of unused state funds.—Section 793(c)(2)(C) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16133(c)(2)(C)) is amended beginning in the matter preceding clause (i) by striking “to each remaining” and all that follows through “this paragraph” in clause (ii) and inserting “to carry out section 792”.
(a) Short title.—This section may be cited as the “Utilizing Significant Emissions with Innovative Technologies Act” or the “USE IT Act”.
(b) Research, investigation, training, and other activities.—Section 103 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7403) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(3), in the first sentence of the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “percursors” and inserting “precursors”; and
(2) in subsection (g)—
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and indenting appropriately;
(B) in the undesignated matter following subparagraph (D) (as so redesignated)—
(C) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) (as so redesignated)—
(D) by adding at the end the following:
“(6) CERTAIN CARBON DIOXIDE ACTIVITIES.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out paragraph (3)(A) with respect to carbon dioxide, the Administrator shall carry out the activities described in each of subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), and (E).
“(B) DIRECT AIR CAPTURE RESEARCH.—
“(i) DEFINITIONS.—In this subparagraph:
“(I) BOARD.—The term ‘Board’ means the Direct Air Capture Technology Advisory Board established by clause (iii)(I).
“(ii) TECHNOLOGY PRIZES.—
“(I) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the USE IT Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, shall establish a program to provide, and shall provide, financial awards on a competitive basis for direct air capture from media in which the concentration of carbon dioxide is dilute.
“(II) DUTIES.—In carrying out this clause, the Administrator shall—
“(aa) subject to subclause (III), develop specific requirements for—
“(AA) the competition process; and
“(BB) the demonstration of performance of approved projects;
“(iii) DIRECT AIR CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY ADVISORY BOARD.—
“(I) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established an advisory board to be known as the ‘Direct Air Capture Technology Advisory Board’.
“(II) COMPOSITION.—The Board shall be composed of 9 members appointed by the Administrator, who shall provide expertise in—
“(IV) INITIAL MEETING.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Board have been appointed, the Board shall hold the initial meeting of the Board.
“(V) MEETINGS.—The Board shall meet at the call of the Chairperson or on the request of the Administrator.
“(VI) QUORUM.—A majority of the members of the Board shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of members may hold hearings.
“(VII) CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON.—The Board shall select a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson from among the members of the Board.
“(VIII) COMPENSATION.—Each member of the Board may be compensated at not to exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay in effect for a position at level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of title 5, United States Code, for each day during which the member is engaged in the actual performance of the duties of the Board.
“(iv) INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.—
“(I) IN GENERAL.—As a condition of receiving a financial award under this subparagraph, an applicant shall agree to vest the intellectual property of the applicant derived from the technology in 1 or more entities that are incorporated in the United States.
“(C) CARBON DIOXIDE UTILIZATION RESEARCH.—
“(i) DEFINITION OF CARBON DIOXIDE UTILIZATION.—In this subparagraph, the term ‘carbon dioxide utilization’ refers to technologies or approaches that lead to the use of carbon dioxide—
“(I) through the fixation of carbon dioxide through photosynthesis or chemosynthesis, such as through the growing of algae or bacteria;
“(ii) PROGRAM.—The Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, shall carry out a research and development program for carbon dioxide utilization to promote existing and new technologies that transform carbon dioxide generated by industrial processes into a product of commercial value, or as an input to products of commercial value.
“(iii) TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of the USE IT Act, in carrying out this subsection, the Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, shall support research and infrastructure activities relating to carbon dioxide utilization by providing technical assistance and financial assistance in accordance with clause (iv).
“(iv) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible to receive technical assistance and financial assistance under clause (iii), a carbon dioxide utilization project shall—
“(I) have access to an emissions stream generated by a stationary source within the United States that is capable of supplying not less than 250 metric tons per day of carbon dioxide for research;
“(v) COORDINATION.—In supporting carbon dioxide utilization projects under this paragraph, the Administrator shall consult with the Secretary of Energy, and, as appropriate, with the head of any other relevant Federal agency, States, the private sector, and institutions of higher education to develop methods and technologies to account for the carbon dioxide emissions avoided by the carbon dioxide utilization projects.
“(D) DEEP SALINE FORMATION REPORT.—
“(i) DEFINITION OF DEEP SALINE FORMATION.—
“(I) IN GENERAL.—In this subparagraph, the term ‘deep saline formation’ means a formation of subsurface geographically extensive sedimentary rock layers saturated with waters or brines that have a high total dissolved solids content and that are below the depth where carbon dioxide can exist in the formation as a supercritical fluid.
“(ii) REPORT.—In consultation with the Secretary of Energy, and, as appropriate, with the head of any other relevant Federal agency and relevant stakeholders, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the USE IT Act, the Administrator shall prepare, submit to Congress, and make publicly available a report that includes—
“(I) a comprehensive identification of potential risks and benefits to project developers associated with increased storage of carbon dioxide captured from stationary sources in deep saline formations, using existing research;
“(E) REPORT ON CARBON DIOXIDE NONREGULATORY STRATEGIES AND TECHNOLOGIES.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Not less frequently than once every 2 years, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report that describes—
“(F) GAO REPORT.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report that—
(c) Report.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this section as the “Administrator”) shall submit to Congress a report describing how funds appropriated to the Administrator during the 5 most recent fiscal years have been used to carry out section 103 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7403), including a description of—
(d) Inclusion of carbon capture infrastructure projects.—Section 41001(6) of the FAST Act (42 U.S.C. 4370m(6)) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following:
“(C) INCLUSION.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), construction of infrastructure for carbon capture includes construction of—
“(i) any facility, technology, or system that captures, utilizes, or sequesters carbon dioxide emissions, including projects for direct air capture (as defined in paragraph (6)(B)(i) of section 103(g) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7403(g)); and
(e) Development of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration report, permitting guidance, and regional permitting task force.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(A) CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND SEQUESTRATION PROJECTS.—The term “carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration projects” includes projects for direct air capture (as defined in paragraph (6)(B)(i) of section 103(g) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7403(g))).
(B) EFFICIENT, ORDERLY, AND RESPONSIBLE.—The term “efficient, orderly, and responsible” means, with respect to development or the permitting process for carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration projects and carbon dioxide pipelines, a process that is completed in an expeditious manner while maintaining environmental, health, and safety protections.
(2) REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality (referred to in this section as the “Chair”), in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of the Interior, the Executive Director of the Federal Permitting Improvement Council, and the head of any other relevant Federal agency (as determined by the President), shall prepare a report that—
(i) compiles all existing relevant Federal permitting and review information and resources for project applicants, agencies, and other stakeholders interested in the deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration projects and carbon dioxide pipelines, including—
(ii) inventories current or emerging activities that transform captured carbon dioxide into a product of commercial value, or as an input to products of commercial value;
(iii) inventories existing initiatives and recent publications that analyze or identify priority carbon dioxide pipelines needed to enable efficient, orderly, and responsible development of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration projects at increased scale;
(3) GUIDANCE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—After submission of the report under paragraph (2)(B), but not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Chair shall submit guidance consistent with that report to all relevant Federal agencies that—
(B) REQUIREMENTS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The guidance under subparagraph (A) shall address requirements under—
(I) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);
(II) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
(III) the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.);
(IV) the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.);
(V) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.);
(VI) division A of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code (formerly known as the “National Historic Preservation Act”);
(VII) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.);
(VIII) the Act of June 8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.) (commonly known as the “Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act”); and
(ii) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS.—The guidance under subparagraph (A) shall include direction to States and other interested parties for the development of programmatic environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration projects and carbon dioxide pipelines.
(C) SUBMISSION; PUBLICATION.—The Chair shall—
(D) EVALUATION.—The Chair shall—
(i) periodically evaluate the reports of the task forces under paragraph (4)(E) and, as necessary, revise the guidance under subparagraph (A); and
(ii) each year, submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, and relevant Federal agencies a report that describes any recommendations for legislation, rules, revisions to rules, or other policies that would address the issues identified by the task forces under paragraph (4)(E).
(4) TASK FORCE.—
(A) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Chair shall establish not less than 2 task forces, which shall each cover a different geographical area with differing demographic, land use, or geological issues—
(B) MEMBERS AND SELECTION.—
(D) DUTIES.—Each task force shall—
(i) inventory existing or potential Federal and State approaches to facilitate reviews associated with the deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration projects and carbon dioxide pipelines, including best practices that—
(ii) develop common models for State-level carbon dioxide pipeline regulation and oversight guidelines that can be shared with States in the geographical area covered by the task force;
(iii) provide technical assistance to States in the geographical area covered by the task force in implementing regulatory requirements and any models developed under clause (ii);
(iv) inventory current or emerging activities that transform captured carbon dioxide into a product of commercial value, or as an input to products of commercial value;
(v) identify any priority carbon dioxide pipelines needed to enable efficient, orderly, and responsible development of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration projects at increased scale;
(vi) identify gaps in the current Federal and State regulatory framework and in existing data for the deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration projects and carbon dioxide pipelines;
(viii) develop recommendations for relevant Federal agencies on how to develop and research technologies that—
(II) would be able to be deployed within the region covered by the task force, including any projects that have received technical or financial assistance for research under paragraph (6) of section 103(g) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7403(g)).
(E) REPORT.—Each year, each task force shall prepare and submit to the Chair and to the other task forces a report that includes—
(a) Availability of legal assistance at facilities of Department of Veterans Affairs.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 59 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 5906. Availability of legal assistance at Department facilities
“(a) In general.—Not less frequently than three times each year, the Secretary shall facilitate the provision by a qualified legal assistance clinic of pro bono legal assistance described in subsection (c) to eligible individuals at not fewer than one medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs, or such other facility of the Department as the Secretary considers appropriate, in each State.
“(c) Pro bono legal assistance described.—The pro bono legal assistance described in this subsection is the following:
“(d) Limitation on use of facilities.—Space in a medical center or facility designated under subsection (a) shall be reserved for and may only be used by the following, subject to review and removal from participation by the Secretary:
(b) Pilot program to establish and support legal assistance clinics.—
(1) PILOT PROGRAM REQUIRED.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of awarding grants to eligible entities to establish new legal assistance clinics, or enhance existing legal assistance clinics or other pro bono efforts, for the provision of pro bono legal assistance described in subsection (c) of section 5906 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), on a year-round basis to individuals who served in the Armed Forces, including individuals who served in a reserve component of the Armed Forces, and who were discharged or released therefrom, regardless of the conditions of such discharge or release, at locations other than medical centers and facilities described in subsection (a) of such section.
(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in subparagraph (A) shall be construed to limit or affect—
(2) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—For purposes of the pilot program, an eligible entity is—
(A) a veterans service organization or other nonprofit organization specifically focused on assisting veterans;
(3) LOCATIONS.—The Secretary shall ensure that at least one grant is awarded under paragraph (1)(A) to at least one eligible entity in each State, if the Secretary determines that there is such an entity in a State that has applied for, and meets requirements for the award of, such a grant.
(4) DURATION.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program during the five-year period beginning on the date on which the Secretary establishes the pilot program.
(5) APPLICATION.—An eligible entity seeking a grant under the pilot program shall submit to the Secretary an application therefore at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.
(6) SELECTION.—The Secretary shall select eligible entities who submit applications under paragraph (5) for the award of grants under the pilot program using a competitive process that takes into account the following:
(c) Review of pro bono eligibility of Federal workers.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Director of the Office of Government Ethics, conduct a review of the rules and regulations governing the circumstances under which attorneys employed by the Federal Government can provide pro bono legal assistance.
(2) RECOMMENDATIONS.—In conducting the review required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall develop recommendations for such legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate to facilitate greater participation by Federal employees in pro bono legal and other volunteer services for veterans.
(d) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the status of the implementation of this section.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) Congress is committed to honoring the sacrifices of wounded and ill members of the Armed Forces.
(2) The Silver Star Service Banner recognizes the members of the Armed Forces and veterans who were wounded or became ill while serving in combat for the United States.
(b) Designation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Section 2203(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 13503(b)) is amended by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
“(3) ESTABLISHED PROGRAM TO STIMULATE COMPETITIVE RESEARCH.—
“(A) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph:
“(i) ELIGIBLE JURISDICTION.—The term ‘eligible jurisdiction’ means a State that is determined to be eligible for a grant under this paragraph in accordance with subparagraph (D).
“(ii) EPSCOR.—The term ‘EPSCoR’ means the Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research operated under subparagraph (B).
“(iii) NATIONAL LABORATORY.—The term ‘National Laboratory’ has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15801).
“(B) PROGRAM OPERATION.—The Secretary shall operate an Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research.
“(C) OBJECTIVES.—The objectives of EPSCoR shall be—
“(i) to increase the number of researchers in eligible jurisdictions, especially at institutions of higher education, capable of performing nationally competitive science and engineering research in support of the mission of the Department of Energy in the areas of applied energy research, environmental management, and basic science;
“(ii) to improve science and engineering research and education programs at institutions of higher education in eligible jurisdictions and enhance the capabilities of eligible jurisdictions to develop, plan, and execute research that is competitive, including through investing in research equipment and instrumentation; and
“(D) ELIGIBLE JURISDICTIONS.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may establish criteria for determining whether a State is eligible for a grant under this paragraph.
“(ii) REQUIREMENT.—Except as provided in clause (iii), in establishing criteria under clause (i), the Secretary shall ensure that a State is eligible for a grant under this paragraph if the State, as determined by the Secretary, is a State that—
“(iii) ELIGIBILITY UNDER NSF EPSCOR.—At the election of the Secretary, or if the Secretary determines not to establish criteria under clause (i), a State is eligible for a grant under this paragraph if the State is eligible to receive funding under the Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research of the National Science Foundation.
“(E) GRANTS IN AREAS OF APPLIED ENERGY RESEARCH, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, AND BASIC SCIENCE.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—EPSCoR shall make grants to eligible jurisdictions to carry out and support applied energy research and research in all areas of environmental management and basic science sponsored by the Department of Energy, including—
“(F) OTHER ACTIVITIES.—EPSCoR may carry out such activities as may be necessary to meet the objectives described in subparagraph (C) in the areas of applied energy research, environmental management, and basic science described in subparagraph (E)(i).
“(G) PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Energy and Natural Resources and Appropriations of the Senate and the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Appropriations of the House of Representatives a plan describing how the Secretary shall implement EPSCoR.
“(ii) CONTENTS OF PLAN.—The plan described in clause (i) shall include a description of—
“(I) the management structure of EPSCoR, which shall ensure that all research areas and activities described in this paragraph are incorporated into EPSCoR;
“(II) efforts to conduct outreach to inform eligible jurisdictions and faculty of changes to, and opportunities under, EPSCoR;
“(H) PROGRAM EVALUATION.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the Secretary shall contract with a federally funded research and development center, the National Academy of Sciences, or a similar organization to carry out an assessment of the effectiveness of EPSCoR, including an assessment of—
“(ii) LIMITATION.—The organization with which the Secretary contracts under clause (i) shall not be a National Laboratory.
“(iii) REPORT.—Not later than 6 years after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Energy and Natural Resources and Appropriations of the Senate and the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Appropriations of the House of Representatives a report describing the results of the assessment carried out under clause (i), including recommendations for improvements that would enable the Secretary to achieve the objectives described in subparagraph (C).”.
(a) In general.—Section 2209 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 659) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
“(6) the term ‘security vulnerability’ has the meaning given that term in section 102(17) of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (6 U.S.C. 1501(17)); and”;
(2) in subsection (c)—
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(12) detecting, identifying, and receiving information about security vulnerabilities relating to critical infrastructure in the information systems and devices for a cybersecurity purpose, as defined in section 102 of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (6 U.S.C. 1501).”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
“(o) Subpoena authority.—
“(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term ‘covered device or system’—
“(2) AUTHORITY.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Director identifies a system connected to the internet with a specific security vulnerability and has reason to believe that the security vulnerability relates to critical infrastructure and affects a covered device or system, and the Director is unable to identify the entity at risk that owns or operates the covered device or system, the Director may issue a subpoena for the production of information necessary to identify and notify the entity at risk, in order to carry out a function authorized under subsection (c)(12).
“(3) COORDINATION.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Director decides to exercise the subpoena authority under this subsection, and in the interest of avoiding interference with ongoing law enforcement investigations, the Director shall coordinate the issuance of any such subpoena with the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, pursuant to inter-agency procedures which the Director, in coordination with the Attorney General, shall develop not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this subsection.
“(4) NONCOMPLIANCE.—If any person, partnership, corporation, association, or entity fails to comply with any duly served subpoena issued under this subsection, the Director may request that the Attorney General seek enforcement of the subpoena in any judicial district in which such person, partnership, corporation, association, or entity resides, is found, or transacts business.
“(5) NOTICE.—Not later than 7 days after the date on which the Director receives information obtained through a subpoena issued under this subsection, the Director shall notify any entity identified by information obtained under the subpoena regarding the subpoena and the identified vulnerability.
“(6) AUTHENTICATION.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Any subpoena issued by the Director under this subsection shall be authenticated with a cryptographic digital signature of an authorized representative of the Agency, or other comparable successor technology, that allows the Agency to demonstrate that the subpoena was issued by the Agency and has not been altered or modified since it was issued by the Agency.
“(7) PROCEDURES.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Director shall establish internal procedures and associated training, applicable to employees and operations of the Agency, regarding subpoenas issued under this subsection, which shall address—
“(A) the protection of and restriction on dissemination of nonpublic information obtained through a subpoena issued under this subsection, including a requirement that the Agency shall not disseminate nonpublic information obtained through a subpoena issued under this subsection that identifies the party that is subject to the subpoena or the entity at risk identified by information obtained, except that the Agency may share the nonpublic information of the entity at risk with another the Department of Justice for the purpose of enforcing the subpoena in accordance with paragraph (4) or with a Federal agency if—
“(i) the Agency identifies or is notified of a cybersecurity incident involving the entity, which relates to the vulnerability which led to the issuance of the subpoena;
“(ii) the Director determines that sharing the nonpublic information with another Federal agency is necessary to allow that Federal agency to take a law enforcement or national security action, subject to the interagency procedures under paragraph (3)(A), or actions related to mitigating or otherwise resolving such incident;
“(B) the restriction on the use of information obtained through the subpoena for a cybersecurity purpose, as defined in section 102 of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (6 U.S.C. 1501);
“(C) the retention and destruction of nonpublic information obtained through a subpoena issued under this subsection, including—
“(D) the processes for providing notice to each party that is subject to the subpoena and each entity identified by information obtained under a subpoena issued under this subsection;
“(E) the processes and criteria for conducting critical infrastructure security risk assessments to determine whether a subpoena is necessary prior to being issued under this subsection; and
“(8) LIMITATION ON PROCEDURES.—The internal procedures established under paragraph (7) may not require an owner or operator of critical infrastructure to take any action as a result of a notice of vulnerability made pursuant to this Act.
“(9) REVIEW OF PROCEDURES.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Privacy Officer of the Agency shall—
“(10) PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION.—Not later than 120 days after establishing the internal procedures under paragraph (7), the Director shall publish information on the website of the Agency regarding the subpoena process under this subsection, including regarding—
“(11) ANNUAL REPORTS.—The Director shall annually submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives a report (which may include a classified annex but with the presumption of declassification) on the use of subpoenas under this subsection by the Director, which shall include—
“(A) a discussion of—
“(i) the effectiveness of the use of subpoenas to mitigate critical infrastructure security vulnerabilities;
“(ii) the critical infrastructure security risk assessment process conducted for subpoenas issued under this subsection;
“(iii) the number of subpoenas issued under this subsection by the Director during the preceding year;
“(12) PUBLICATION OF THE ANNUAL REPORTS.—The Director shall publish a version of the annual report required by paragraph (11) on the website of the Agency, which shall, at a minimum, include the findings described in clauses (iii), (iv) and (v) of paragraph (11)(A).
“(13) PROHIBITION ON USE OF INFORMATION FOR UNAUTHORIZED PURPOSES.—Any information obtained pursuant to a subpoena issued under this subsection shall not be provided to any other Federal agency for any purpose other than a cybersecurity purpose, as defined in section 102 of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (6 U.S.C. 1501) or for the purpose of enforcing a subpoena under paragraph (4).”.
(b) Rules of construction.—
(1) PROHIBITION ON NEW REGULATORY AUTHORITY.—Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall be construed to grant the Secretary of Homeland Security (in this subsection referred to as the “Secretary”), or another Federal agency, any authority to promulgate regulations or set standards relating to the cybersecurity of private sector critical infrastructure that was not in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act.
The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report evaluating how the Department of Veterans Affairs has handled claims for disability-related benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of veterans with type 1 diabetes who have been exposed to a herbicide agent (as defined in section 1116(a)(3) of title 38, United States Code).
Section 901 of title IX of division J of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 116–94) is amended—
(a) In general.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall submit to Congress a report on research and development investments, infrastructure, and workforce development investments of the Federal Government that enable continued United States leadership in industries of the future.
(b) Contents.—The report submitted under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A definition, for purposes of this Act, of the term “industries of the future” that includes emerging technologies.
(2) An assessment of the current baseline of investments in civilian research and development investments of the Federal Government in the industries of the future.
(3) A plan to double such baseline investments in artificial intelligence and quantum information science by fiscal year 2022.
(4) A detailed plan to increase investments described in paragraph (2) in industries of the future to $10,000,000,000 per year by fiscal year 2025.
(a) Establishment.—
(b) Membership.—
(1) COMPOSITION.—The Council shall be composed of members from the Federal Government as follows:
(B) A chairperson of the Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence of the National Science and Technology Council.
(C) A chairperson of the Subcommittee on Advanced Manufacturing of the National Science and Technology Council.
(c) Duties.—The duties of the Council are as follows:
(1) To provide the Director with advice on ways in which in the Federal Government can ensure the United States continues to lead the world in developing emerging technologies that improve the quality of life of the people of the United States, increase economic competitiveness of the United States, and strengthen the national security of the United States, including identification of the following:
(A) Investments required in fundamental research and development, infrastructure, and workforce development of the United States workers who will support the industries of the future.
(B) Actions necessary to create and further develop the workforce that will support the industries of the future.
This subtitle may be cited as the “Reliable Emergency Alert Distribution Improvement Act of 2020” or “READI Act”.
In this subtitle—
(3) the term “Emergency Alert System” means the national public warning system, the rules for which are set forth in part 11 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation); and
(4) the term “Wireless Emergency Alerts System” means the wireless national public warning system established under the Warning, Alert, and Response Network Act (47 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.), the rules for which are set forth in part 10 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).
(a) Amendment.—Section 602(b)(2)(E) of the Warning, Alert, and Response Network Act (47 U.S.C. 1201(b)(2)(E)) is amended—
(a) Definitions.—In this section—
(a) In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall develop and issue guidance on how State, Tribal, and local governments can participate in the integrated public alert and warning system of the United States described in section 526 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 321o) (referred to in this section as the “public alert and warning system”) while maintaining the integrity of the public alert and warning system, including—
(1) guidance on the categories of public emergencies and appropriate circumstances that warrant an alert and warning from State, Tribal, and local governments using the public alert and warning system;
(2) the procedures for State, Tribal, and local government officials to authenticate civil emergencies and initiate, modify, and cancel alerts transmitted through the public alert and warning system, including protocols and technology capabilities for—
(A) the initiation, or prohibition on the initiation, of alerts by a single authorized or unauthorized individual;
(3) the standardization, functionality, and interoperability of incident management and warning tools used by State, Tribal, and local governments to notify the public of an emergency through the public alert and warning system;
(4) the annual training and recertification of emergency management personnel on requirements for originating and transmitting an alert through the public alert and warning system;
(5) the procedures, protocols, and guidance concerning the protective action plans that State, Tribal, and local governments should issue to the public following an alert issued under the public alert and warning system;
(6) the procedures, protocols, and guidance concerning the communications that State, Tribal, and local governments should issue to the public following a false alert issued under the public alert and warning system;
(7) a plan by which State, Tribal, and local government officials may, during an emergency, contact each other as well as Federal officials and participants in the Emergency Alert System and the Wireless Emergency Alerts System, when appropriate and necessary, by telephone, text message, or other means of communication regarding an alert that has been distributed to the public; and
(b) Coordination with National Advisory Council report.—The Administrator shall ensure that the guidance developed under subsection (a) does not conflict with recommendations made for improving the public alert and warning system provided in the report submitted by the National Advisory Council under section 2(b)(7)(B) of the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Modernization Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–143; 130 Stat. 332).
(c) Public consultation.—In developing the guidance under subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure appropriate public consultation and, to the extent practicable, coordinate the development of the guidance with stakeholders of the public alert and warning system, including—
(1) appropriate personnel from Federal agencies, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Commission;
(2) representatives of State and local governments and emergency services personnel, who shall be selected from among individuals nominated by national organizations representing those governments and personnel;
(5) vendors, developers, and manufacturers of systems, facilities, equipment, and capabilities for the provision of communications services;
(7) the national organization representing the licensees and permittees of noncommercial broadcast television stations;
(d) Inapplicability of FACA.—The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the public consultation with stakeholders under subsection (c).
(e) Rule of construction.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to amend, supplement, or abridge the authority of the Commission under the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) or in any other manner give the Administrator authority over communications service providers participating in the Emergency Alert System or the Wireless Emergency Alerts System.
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission, in consultation with the Administrator, shall complete a rulemaking proceeding to establish a system to receive from the Administrator or State, Tribal, or local governments reports of false alerts under the Emergency Alert System or the Wireless Emergency Alerts System for the purpose of recording such false alerts and examining their causes.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission, in consultation with the Administrator, shall complete a rulemaking proceeding to modify the Emergency Alert System to provide for repeating Emergency Alert System messages while an alert remains pending that is issued by—
(a) Study.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and after providing public notice and opportunity for comment, the Commission shall complete an inquiry to examine the feasibility of updating the Emergency Alert System to enable or improve alerts to consumers provided through the internet, including through streaming services.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(2) GOVERNMENT OF AFGHANISTAN.—The term “Government of Afghanistan” means the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and its agencies, instrumentalities, and controlled entities.
(3) THE TALIBAN.—The term “the Taliban”—
(4) FEBRUARY 29 AGREEMENT.—The term “February 29 Agreement” refers to the political arrangement between the United States and the Taliban titled “Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan Between the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban and the United States of America” signed at Doha, Qatar February 29, 2020.
(b) Oversight of peace process and other agreements.—
(1) TRANSMISSION TO CONGRESS OF MATERIALS RELEVANT TO THE FEBRUARY 29 AGREEMENT.—The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall continue to submit to the appropriate congressional committees materials relevant to the February 29 Agreement.
(2) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS OF ANY FUTURE DEALS INVOLVING THE TALIBAN.—The Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, within 5 days of conclusion and on an ongoing basis thereafter, any future agreement or arrangement involving the Taliban in any manner, as well as materials relevant to any future agreement or arrangement involving the Taliban in any manner.
(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the terms “materials relevant to the February 29 Agreement” and “materials relevant to any future agreement or arrangement” include all annexes, appendices, and instruments for implementation of the February 29 Agreement or a future agreement or arrangement, as well as any understandings or expectations related to the Agreement or a future agreement or arrangement.
(c) Report and briefing on verification and compliance.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—
(A) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and not less frequently than once every 120 days thereafter, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report verifying whether the key tenets of the February 29 Agreement, or future agreements, and accompanying implementing frameworks are being preserved and honored.
(B) BRIEFING.—At the time of each report submitted under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of State shall direct a Senate-confirmed Department of State official and other appropriate officials to brief the appropriate congressional committees on the contents of the report. The Director of National Intelligence shall also direct an appropriate official to participate in the briefing.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report and briefing required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) an assessment—
(B) an assessment of Taliban actions against terrorist threats to United States national security interests;
(C) an assessment of whether Taliban officials have made a complete, transparent, public, and verifiable breaking of all ties with al-Qaeda;
(D) an assessment of the current relationship between the Taliban and al-Qaeda, including any interactions between members of the two groups in Afghanistan, Pakistan, or other countries, and any change in Taliban conduct towards al-Qaeda since February 29, 2020;
(E) an assessment of the relationship between the Taliban and any other terrorist group that is assessed to threaten the security of the United States or its allies, including any change in conduct since February 29, 2020;
(F) an assessment of whether the Haqqani Network has broken ties with al-Qaeda, and whether the Haqqani Network’s leader Sirajuddin Haqqani remains part of the leadership structure of the Taliban;
(G) an assessment of threats emanating from Afghanistan against the United States homeland and United States partners, and a description of how the United States Government is responding to those threats;
(H) an assessment of intra-Afghan discussions, political reconciliation, and progress towards a political roadmap that seeks to serve all Afghans;
(J) an assessment as to whether the terms of any reduction in violence or ceasefire are being met by all sides in the conflict;
(K) a detailed overview of any United States and NATO presence remaining in Afghanistan and any planned changes to such force posture;
(L) an assessment of the status of human rights, including the rights of women, minorities, and youth;
(M) an assessment of the access of women, minorities, and youth to education, justice, and economic opportunities in Afghanistan;
(N) an assessment of the status of the rule of law and governance structures at the central, provincial, and district levels of government;
(P) an assessment of illicit narcotics production in Afghanistan, its linkages to terrorism, corruption, and instability, and policies to counter illicit narcotics flows;
(Q) an assessment of corruption in Government of Afghanistan institutions at the district, provincial, and central levels of government;
(R) an assessment of the number of Taliban and Afghan prisoners and any plans for the release of such prisoners from either side;
(U) a detailed overview of national-level efforts to promote transitional justice, including forensic efforts and documentation of war crimes, mass killings, or crimes against humanity, redress to victims, and reconciliation activities;
(V) A detailed overview of United States support for Government of Afghanistan and civil society efforts to promote peace and justice at the local level and how these efforts are informing government-level policies and negotiations;
(W) an assessment of the progress made by the Afghanistan Ministry of Interior and the Office of the Attorney General to address gross violations of human rights (GVHRs) by civilian security forces, Taliban, and non-government armed groups, including—
(X) an overview of civilian casualties caused by the Taliban, non-government armed groups, and Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, including—
(ii) a description of steps taken by the Government of Afghanistan to minimize civilian casualties and other harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure;
(3) COUNTERTERRORISM STRATEGY.—In the event that the Taliban does not meet its counterterrorism obligations under the February 29 Agreement, the report and briefing required under this subsection shall include information detailing the United States’ counterterrorism strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 7503 of the Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act of 2019 (title LXXV of Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(b) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) On August 24, 1991, Ukraine became a free and independent country after declaring its independence from the Soviet Union.
(2) The Russian Federation is required to respect the independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of Ukraine through its signed commitments to the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, the 1975 Helsinki Accords, and the Charter of the United Nations.
(3) On February 8, 1994, Ukraine was among the first post-Soviet states to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Partnership for Peace, and Ukraine subsequently participated in numerous North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led security assistance, peacekeeping, counterterror, and maritime initiatives.
(4) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Ukraine have continuously deepened their cooperation through the establishment of—
(A) the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-Ukraine Charter on a Distinctive Partnership and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization-Ukraine Commission in 1997;
(5) In the Bucharest Summit Declaration of April 2008, heads of state and governments of North Atlantic Treaty Organization member countries declared, “NATO welcomes Ukraine’s and Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO.”.
(6) Beginning on November 21, 2013, and ending on February 22, 2014, during a period that became known as the Revolution of Dignity, the people of Ukraine peacefully protested the decision of then President Viktor Yanukovych to suspend the signing of the Ukraine-European Union Association Agreement, resulting in the unanimous removal from office of Yanukovych by the Verkhovna Rada.
(7) On May 25, 2014, Peter Poroshenko was elected democratically to become the President of Ukraine based on a pro-European Union and pro-North Atlantic Treaty Organization platform, which laid the foundation for progress on the European Union Association Agreement.
(8) In response to Ukraine’s Revolution of Dignity, the Russian Federation launched an overt and covert military campaign against Ukraine, illegally occupied Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula, and instigated war in eastern Ukraine, resulting in the deaths of approximately 14,000 Ukrainians.
(9) The Russian Federation’s invasion and illegal occupation of the Crimean Peninsula and instigation of conflict in eastern Ukraine in 2014 was widely viewed as an effort to stifle pro-democracy and pro-Western developments across Ukraine in the wake of the Revolution of Dignity.
(10) At the 2014 Wales Summit, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization adopted the Enhanced Opportunities Partnership Program as a component of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Partnership Interoperability Initiative, which would “encourage, facilitate, and sustain” Ukraine’s contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
(11) In 2016, as a result of the Warsaw Summit, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization pledged additional training and technical support for the military forces of Ukraine and endorsed a comprehensive assistance package that included “tailored capability and capacity building measures … to enhance Ukraine’s resilience against a wide array of threats, including hybrid threats”.
(12) In 2017, in the face of continued Russian Federation aggression in the eastern region of Ukraine and the continued occupation of Crimea, the Government of Ukraine rejected cooperation with the Russian Federation and voted to make cooperation with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization a foreign policy priority.
(14) On April 21, 2019, the new president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy—
(15) In January 2020, the Government of Ukraine requested that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization grant Ukraine the status of an Enhanced Opportunities Partner.
(c) Sense of Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that the Senate—
(1) applauds the progress of Ukraine and the Revolution of Dignity with respect to strengthening the rule of law and combating corruption, aligning with Euro-Atlantic norms and standards, and improving Ukraine's military combat readiness and interoperability with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization;
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may establish a pilot program in Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia—
(b) Elements.—The activities of the pilot program under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Provision of training to cybersecurity and computer science professionals in Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia.
(2) An expansion of the capacity of organizations involved in the training of such cybersecurity and computer science professionals.
(3) The facilitation of regular policy dialogues between and among the United States Government and the governments of Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia with respect to the development of infrastructure to protect against cyber attacks.
(4) An evaluation of legal and other barriers to reforms relevant to cybersecurity and technology in Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia.
(c) Funding.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into cooperative agreements with entities that receive funds under section 211 of the Vietnam Education Foundation Act of 2000 (title II of division B of H.R. 5666, as enacted by section 1(a)(4) of Public Law 106–554 and contained in appendix D of that Act; 114 Stat. 2763A–254; 22 U.S.C. 2452 note), as added by section 7085 of the Consolidated and Further Appropriations Act, 2015 (Public Law 113–235; 128 Stat. 2685), to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a).
(d) Reports.—
(1) DESIGN OF PILOT PROGRAM.—Not later than June 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the design of the pilot program under subsection (a).
(e) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2021 to carry out this section.
(f) Offset.—The amount authorized to be appropriated by this Act for operation and maintenance, Navy, and available for SAG 1CCS for military information support operations, is hereby reduced by $5,000,000.
(a) Studies required.—
(1) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STUDY.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), the Director of the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, the Director of the Office of Net Assessment, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Indo-Pacific Security Affairs, and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, shall complete a comparative study on the defense budgets of the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the United States.
(2) INDEPENDENT STUDY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall offer to enter into an agreement with not more than two entities independent of the Department to conduct a comparative study on the defense budgets of the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the United States, to be completed not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Goal.—The goal of the studies required by subsection (a) shall be to develop a methodologically sound set of assumptions to underpin a comparison of the defense spending of the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the United States.
(c) Elements.—Each study required by subsection (a) shall do the following:
(2) Consider the effects of purchasing power parity and market exchange rates, particularly on nontraded goods.
(d) Report.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the studies required by subsection (a) are completed, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the results of each study, together with the views of the Secretary on each study.
Section 1286 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—
(2) by adding after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f):
“(f) Designation of academic liaison.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall designate an academic liaison with principal responsibility for working with the academic community to protect Department-sponsored academic research of concern from undue foreign influence.
“(2) QUALIFICATION.—The Secretary shall designate an individual under paragraph (1) who is an official of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering.
“(3) DUTIES.—The duties of the academic liaison designated under paragraph (1) shall be as follows:
“(B) To conduct annual outreach and education activities for the academic community on undue foreign influence and threats to Department-sponsored academic research of concern.
“(C) To coordinate and align academic security policies with Department component agencies, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the intelligence community, Federal science agencies, and Federal regulatory agencies, including agencies involved in export controls.
“(D) To the extent practicable, to coordinate on an annual basis with the intelligence community to share, not less frequently than annually, with the academic community unclassified information, including counterintelligence information, on threats from undue foreign influence.
It is the sense of the Senate that—
(1) the Department of Defense has cooperated extensively with Israel to assist in the procurement of precision-guided munitions, and such cooperation represents an important example of robust United States support for Israel;
(2) to the extent practicable, the Secretary of Defense should take further measures to expedite deliveries of precision-guided munitions to Israel; and
(3) regularized annual purchases of precision-guided munitions by Israel, in accordance with existing requirements and practices regarding the export of defense articles and defense services, coordinated with the United States Air Force annual purchase of precision-guided munitions, would enhance the security of both the United States and Israel by—
(b) Definitions.—Section 481(e) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291(e)) is amended—
(2) in paragraph (4)—
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(E) assistance that furthers the objectives set forth in paragraphs (1) through (4) of section 664(b) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (22 U.S.C. 2151n–2(b));
“(F) assistance to combat trafficking authorized under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.)); and
“(G) global health assistance authorized under sections 104 through 104C of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151b through 22 U.S.C. 2151b–4).”.
(c) International narcotics control strategy report.—Section 489(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291h(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(9) A separate section that contains the following:
“(A) An identification of the countries, to the extent feasible, that are the most significant sources of illicit fentanyl and fentanyl analogues significantly affecting the United States during the preceding calendar year.
“(B) A description of the extent to which each country identified pursuant to subparagraph (A) has cooperated with the United States to prevent the articles or chemicals described in subparagraph (A) from being exported from such country to the United States.
“(C) A description of whether each country identified pursuant to subparagraph (A) has adopted and utilizes scheduling or other procedures for illicit drugs that are similar in effect to the procedures authorized under title II of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811 et seq.) for adding drugs and other substances to the controlled substances schedules;
“(D) A description of whether each country identified pursuant to subparagraph (A) is following steps to prosecute individuals involved in the illicit manufacture or distribution of controlled substance analogues (as defined in section 102(32) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(32)); and
“(E) A description of whether each country identified pursuant to subparagraph (A) requires the registration of tableting machines and encapsulating machines or other measures similar in effect to the registration requirements set forth in part 1310 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, and has not made good faith efforts, in the opinion of the Secretary, to improve regulation of tableting machines and encapsulating machines.”.
(d) Withholding of bilateral and multilateral assistance.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 490(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291j(a)) is amended—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “or country identified pursuant to clause (i) or (ii) of section 489(a)(8)(A) of this Act” and inserting “country identified pursuant to section 489(a)(8)(A), or country thrice identified during a 5-year period pursuant to section 489(a)(9)(A)”; and
(B) in paragraph (2), by striking “or major drug-transit country (as determined under subsection (h)) or country identified pursuant to clause (i) or (ii) of section 489(a)(8)(A) of this Act” and inserting “, major drug-transit country, country identified pursuant to section 489(a)(8)(A), or country thrice identified during a 5-year period pursuant to section 489(a)(9)(A)”.
(2) DESIGNATION OF ILLICIT FENTANYL COUNTRIES WITHOUT SCHEDULING PROCEDURES.—Section 706(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (22 U.S.C. 2291j–1(2)) is amended—
(D) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
“(B) designate each country, if any, identified under section 489(a)(9) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291h(a)(9)) that has failed to adopt and utilize scheduling procedures for illicit drugs that are comparable to the procedures authorized under title II of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811 et seq.) for adding drugs and other substances to the controlled substances schedules;”; and
(3) DESIGNATION OF ILLICIT FENTANYL COUNTRIES WITHOUT ABILITY TO PROSECUTE CRIMINALS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR DISTRIBUTION OF FENTANYL ANALOGUES.—Section 706(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (22 U.S.C. 2291j–1(2)), as amended by paragraph (2), is further amended by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
“(C) designate each country, if any, identified under section 489(a)(9) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291h(a)(9)) that has not taken significant steps to prosecute individuals involved in the illicit manufacture or distribution of controlled substance analogues (as defined in section 102(32) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(32));”.
(4) LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE FOR DESIGNATED COUNTRIES.—Section 706(3) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (22 U.S.C. 2291j–1(3)) is amended by striking “also designated under paragraph (2) in the report” and inserting “designated in the report under paragraph (2)(A) or thrice designated during a 5-year period in the report under subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (2)”.
(5) EXCEPTION TO THE LIMITATION ON ASSISTANCE.—Section 706(5) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (22 U.S.C. 2291j–1(5)) is amended—
(B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
“(C) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), assistance to promote democracy (as described in section 481(e)(4)(E) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291(e)(4)(E))) shall be provided to countries identified in a report under paragraph (1) and designated under subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (2), to the extent such countries are otherwise eligible for such assistance, regardless of whether the President reports to the appropriate congressional committees in accordance with such paragraph.
“(D) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), assistance to combat trafficking (as described in section 481(e)(4)(F) of such Act) shall be provided to countries identified in a report under paragraph (1) and designated under subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (2), to the extent such countries are otherwise eligible for such assistance, regardless of whether the President reports to the appropriate congressional committees in accordance with such paragraph.
“(E) Notwithstanding paragraph (3), global health assistance (as described in section 481(e)(4)(G) of such Act) shall be provided to countries identified in a report under paragraph (1) and designated under subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (2), to the extent such countries are otherwise eligible for such assistance, regardless of whether the President reports to the appropriate congressional committees in accordance with such paragraph”; and
This subtitle may be cited as the “United States-Israel Security Assistance Authorization Act of 2020”.
In this subtitle, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
Congress makes the following findings:
(1) On September 14, 2016, the United States and Israel signed a 10-year Memorandum of Understanding to reaffirm the importance of continuing annual United States military assistance to Israel and cooperative missile defense programs in a way that enhances Israel’s security and strengthens the bilateral relationship between the 2 countries.
(2) The 2016 Memorandum of Understanding reflects United States support of Foreign Military Financing grant assistance to Israel over a 10-year period beginning in fiscal year 2019 and ending in fiscal year 2028.
(3) The 2016 Memorandum of Understanding also reflects United States support for funding for cooperative programs to develop, produce, and procure missile, rocket, and projectile defense capabilities during such 10-year period at an average funding level of $500,000,000 per year, totaling $5,000,000,000 for such period.
It is the policy of the United States to provide assistance to the Government of Israel for the development and acquisition of advanced capabilities that Israel requires to meet its security needs and to enhance United States capabilities.
Section 513(c) of the Security Assistance Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–280; 114 Stat. 856) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “2002 and 2003” and inserting “2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, and 2028”;
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “equal to—” and all that follows and inserting “not less than $3,300,000,000.”; and
(3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
“(3) DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS.—Amounts authorized to be available for Israel under paragraph (1) and subsection (b)(1) for fiscal years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, and 2028 shall be disbursed not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of an Act making appropriations for the Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the respective fiscal year, or October 31 of the respective fiscal year, whichever is later.”.
(a) Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005.—Section 12001(d) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–287; 118 Stat. 1011) is amended by striking “September 30, 2020” and inserting “after September 30, 2025”.
(b) Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.—Section 514(b)(2)(A) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h(b)(2)(A)) is amended by striking “2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020” and inserting “2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025”.
Chapter 5 of title I of the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003 (Public Law 108–11; 117 Stat. 576) is amended under the heading “Loan Guarantees to Israel”—
(a) In general.—Notwithstanding section 514 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321h), the President is authorized to transfer to Israel precision guided munitions from reserve stocks for Israel in such quantities as may be necessary for legitimate self-defense of Israel and is otherwise consistent with the purposes and conditions for such transfers under the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.).
(b) Certifications.—Except in case of emergency, as determined by the President, not later than 5 days before making a transfer under subsection (a), the President shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees that the transfer of the precision guided munitions—
(1) does not affect the ability of the United States to maintain a sufficient supply of precision guided munitions;
It is the sense of Congress that the President should—
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(2) Israel has declared its unilateral adherence to the Missile Technology Control Regime, the Australia Group, and the Nuclear Suppliers Group.
(3) Israel is a party to—
(A) the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, signed at Geneva June 17, 1925 (commonly known as the “Geneva Protocol”);
(4) Section 6(b) of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 (22 U.S.C. 8603 note) directs the President, consistent with the commitments of the United States under international agreements, to take steps so that Israel may be included in the list of countries eligible for the strategic trade authorization exception under section 740.20(c)(1) of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, to the requirement for a license for the export, re-export, or in-country transfer of an item subject to controls under the Export Administration Regulations.
(b) Briefing on eligibility for strategic trade authorization exception.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall brief the appropriate congressional committees by describing the steps taken to include Israel in the list of countries eligible for the strategic trade authorization exception under section 740.20(c)(1) of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, as required under section 6(b) of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–296).
(a) Findings.—Congress finds that the United States Agency for International Development and Israel’s Agency for International Development Cooperation signed memoranda of understanding in 2012, 2017, and 2019 to coordinate the agencies’ respective efforts to promote common development goals in third countries.
(b) Sense of Congress regarding USAID policy.—It is the sense of Congress that the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development should continue to cooperate with Israel to advance common development goals in third countries across a wide variety of sectors, including energy, agriculture, food security, democracy, human rights, governance, economic growth, trade, education, environment, global health, water, and sanitation.
(c) Memoranda of understanding.—The Secretary of State, acting through the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, may enter into memoranda of understanding with Israel to advance common goals on energy, agriculture, food security, democracy, human rights, governance, economic growth, trade, education, environment, global health, water, and sanitation, with a focus on strengthening mutual ties and cooperation with nations throughout the world.
Section 106 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151d) is amended by striking subsections (e) and (f) and inserting the following:
“(e) There are authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2021 through 2025 to finance cooperative projects among the United States, Israel, and developing countries that identify and support local solutions to address sustainability challenges relating to water resources, agriculture, and energy storage, including—
“(2) supporting the identification, research, development testing, and scaling of innovations that focus on populations that are vulnerable to environmental and resource-scarcity crises, such as subsistence farming communities;
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States should help foster cooperation in the Middle East region by financing and, as appropriate, cooperating in projects related to innovation and advanced technologies; and
(b) Establishment.—The Secretary of State, acting through the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, is authorized to seek to establish a program between the United States and appropriate regional partners to provide for cooperation in the Middle East region by supporting projects related to innovation and advanced technologies.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(a) Authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized to carry out research, development, test, and evaluation activities, on a joint basis with Israel, to establish directed energy capabilities that address threats to the United States, deployed forces of the United States, or Israel. Any activities carried out under this paragraph shall be conducted in a manner that appropriately protects sensitive information, intellectual property, the national security interests of the United States, and the national security interests of Israel.
(2) REPORT.—The activities described in paragraph (1) may be carried out after the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, submits a report to the appropriate congressional committees that includes—
(A) a memorandum of agreement between the United States and Israel regarding sharing of research and development costs for the capabilities described in paragraph (1), and any supporting documents; and
(B) a certification that the memorandum of agreement referred to in subparagraph (A)—
(i) requires sharing of costs of projects, including in-kind support, between the United States and Israel;
(b) Support in connection with activities.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized to provide maintenance and sustainment support to Israel for the directed energy capabilities research, development, test, and evaluation activities authorized under subsection (a)(1), including the installation of equipment that is necessary to carry out such research, development, test, and evaluation.
(2) REPORT.—The support described in paragraph (1) may not be provided until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, submits a report to the appropriate congressional committees that describes in detail the support to be provided.
(a) In general.—Activities authorized under this section shall be carried out with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and aligned with the National Security Strategy of the United States, the United States Government Global Health Security Strategy, the Department of State Integrated Country Strategies, the USAID Country Development Cooperation Strategies, and any equivalent or successor plans or strategies, as necessary and appropriate
(b) Development of health technologies.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Health and Human Services $4,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2021 through 2023 for a bilateral cooperative program with the Government of Israel that awards grants for the development of health technologies, including health technologies listed in paragraph (2), subject to paragraph (3), with an emphasis on collaboratively advancing the use of technology and personalized medicine in relation to COVID–19.
(2) TYPES OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES.—The health technologies described in this paragraph may include technologies such as sensors, drugs and vaccinations, respiratory assist devices, diagnostic tests, and telemedicine.
(3) RESTRICTIONS ON FUNDING.—Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) are subject to a matching contribution from the Government of Israel.
(4) OPTION FOR ESTABLISHING NEW PROGRAM.—Amounts appropriated pursuant to paragraph (1) may be expended for a bilateral program with the Government of Israel that—
(A) is in existence on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act for the purposes described in paragraph (1); or
(B) is established after the date of the enactment of this Act by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Secretary of State, in accordance with the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the State of Israel on Cooperation in Science and Technology for Homeland Security Matters, done at Jerusalem May 29, 2008 (or a successor agreement), for the purposes described in paragraph (1).
(c) Coordinator of United States–Israel research and development.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President may designate the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, or another appropriate Department of State official, to act as Coordinator of United States-Israel Research and Development (referred to in this subsection as the “Coordinator”).
(d) Office of Global Policy and Strategy of the Food and Drug Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—It is the sense of Congress that the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration should seek to explore collaboration with Israel through the Office of Global Policy and Strategy.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commissioner, acting through the head of the Office of Global Policy and Strategy, shall submit a report describing the benefits to the United States and to Israel of opening an office in Israel for the Office of Global Policy and Strategy to—
(e) United States–Israel Energy Center.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $4,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2021 through 2023 to carry out the activities of the United States-Israel Energy Center established pursuant to section 917(d) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17337(d)).
(f) United States–Israel Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation.—It is the sense of Congress that grants to promote covered energy projects conducted by, or in conjunction with, the United States-Israel Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation should be funded at not less than $2,000,000 annually under section 917(b) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17337(b)).
(g) United States–Israel cooperation on energy, water, homeland security, agriculture, and alternative fuel technologies.—Section 7 of the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act of 2014 (22 U.S.C. 8606) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(h) Annual policy dialogue.—It is the sense of Congress that the Department of Transportation and Israel’s Ministry of Transportation should engage in an annual policy dialogue to implement the 2016 Memorandum of Cooperation signed by the Secretary of Transportation and the Israeli Minister of Transportation.
(i) Cooperation on space exploration and science initiatives.—The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration shall continue to work with the Israel Space Agency to identify and cooperatively pursue peaceful space exploration and science initiatives in areas of mutual interest, taking all appropriate measures to protect sensitive information, intellectual property, trade secrets, and economic interests of the United States.
(j) Research and development cooperation relating to desalination technology.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall submit a report that describes research and development cooperation with international partners, such as the State of Israel, in the area of desalination technology in accordance with section 9(b)(3) of the Water Desalination Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 10301 note) to—
(k) Research and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs should seek to explore collaboration between the Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers of Excellence and Israeli institutions with expertise in researching and treating posttraumatic stress disorder.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Congress a report detailing the mission need and efficacy of full disk encryption across Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNet) and Secretary Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet) endpoint computer systems. Such report shall cover matters relating to cost, mission impact, and implementation timeline.
(a) Guidance required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to the secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the defense components on improved use of the direct hiring processes for artificial intelligence professionals and other data science and software development personnel.
(b) Objective.—The objective of the guidance issued under subsection (a) shall be to ensure that organizational leaders assume greater responsibility for the results of civilian hiring of artificial intelligence professionals and other data science and software development personnel.
(c) Contents of guidance.—At a minimum, the guidance required by subsection (a) shall—
(1) instruct human resources professionals and hiring authorities to utilize available direct hiring authorities (including excepted service authorities) for the hiring of artificial intelligence professionals and other data science and software development personnel, to the maximum extent practicable;
(2) instruct hiring authorities, when using direct hiring authorities, to prioritize utilization of panels of subject matter experts over human resources professionals to assess applicant qualifications and determine which applicants are best qualified for a position;
(d) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date on which the guidance is issued under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (a).
(2) CONTENTS.—At a minimum, the report submitted under paragraph (1) shall address the following:
(A) The objectives of the guidance and the manner in which the guidance seeks to achieve those objectives.
(b) Cybersecurity State Coordinator.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title XXII of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) is amended—
(A) in section 2202(c) (6 U.S.C. 652(c))—
(B) by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 2215. Cybersecurity State Coordinator.
“(a) Appointment.—The Director shall appoint an employee of the Agency in each State, with the appropriate cybersecurity qualifications and expertise, who shall serve as the Cybersecurity State Coordinator.
“(b) Duties.—The duties of a Cybersecurity State Coordinator appointed under subsection (a) shall include—
“(1) building strategic relationships across Federal and, on a voluntary basis, non-Federal entities by advising on establishing governance structures to facilitate the development and maintenance of secure and resilient infrastructure;
“(2) serving as a Federal cybersecurity risk advisor and coordinating between Federal and, on a voluntary basis, non-Federal entities to support preparation, response, and remediation efforts relating to cybersecurity risks and incidents;
“(3) facilitating the sharing of cyber threat information between Federal and, on a voluntary basis, non-Federal entities to improve understanding of cybersecurity risks and situational awareness of cybersecurity incidents;
“(4) raising awareness of the financial, technical, and operational resources available from the Federal Government to non-Federal entities to increase resilience against cyber threats;
“(5) supporting training, exercises, and planning for continuity of operations to expedite recovery from cybersecurity incidents, including ransomware;
“(6) serving as a principal point of contact for non-Federal entities to engage, on a voluntary basis, with the Federal Government on preparing, managing, and responding to cybersecurity incidents;
(2) OVERSIGHT.—The Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency shall provide to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives a briefing on the placement and efficacy of the Cybersecurity State Coordinators appointed under section 2215 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as added by paragraph (1)—
(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection or the amendments made by this subsection shall be construed to affect or otherwise modify the authority of Federal law enforcement agencies with respect to investigations relating to cybersecurity incidents.
(4) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–296; 116 Stat. 2135) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2214 the following:
“Sec. 2215. Cybersecurity State Coordinator.”.
(a) Short title.—This section may be cited as the “Cybersecurity Advisory Committee Authorization Act of 2020”.
(b) In general.—Subtitle A of title XXII of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 651 et seq.), as amended by section 6613 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 2216. Cybersecurity Advisory Committee.
“(a) Establishment.—The Secretary shall establish within the Agency a Cybersecurity Advisory Committee (referred to in this section as the ‘Advisory Committee’).
“(b) Duties.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Advisory Committee shall advise, consult with, report to, and make recommendations to the Director, as appropriate, on the development, refinement, and implementation of policies, programs, planning, and training pertaining to the cybersecurity mission of the Agency.
“(2) RECOMMENDATIONS.—
“(4) ANNUAL REPORT.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Advisory Committee shall submit to the Director an annual report providing information on the activities, findings, and recommendations of the Advisory Committee, including its subcommittees, for the preceding year.
“(B) PUBLICATION.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Director receives an annual report for a year under subparagraph (A), the Director shall publish a public version of the report describing the activities of the Advisory Committee and such related matters as would be informative to the public during that year, consistent with section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code.
“(5) FEEDBACK.—Not later than 90 days after receiving any recommendation submitted by the Advisory Committee under paragraph (2), (3), or (4), the Director shall respond in writing to the Advisory Committee with feedback on the recommendation. Such a response shall include—
“(6) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—Not less frequently than once per year after the date of enactment of this section, the Director shall provide to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a briefing on feedback from the Advisory Committee.
“(c) Membership.—
“(1) APPOINTMENT.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Cybersecurity Advisory Committee Authorization Act of 2020, the Director shall appoint the members of the Advisory Committee.
“(B) COMPOSITION.—The membership of the Advisory Committee shall consist of not more than 35 individuals.
“(C) REPRESENTATION.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—The membership of the Advisory Committee shall—
“(2) TERM OF OFFICE.—
“(A) TERMS.—The term of each member of the Advisory Committee shall be 2 years, except that a member may continue to serve until a successor is appointed.
“(3) PROHIBITION ON COMPENSATION.—The members of the Advisory Committee may not receive pay or benefits from the United States Government by reason of their service on the Advisory Committee.
“(4) MEETINGS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Director shall require the Advisory Committee to meet not less frequently than semiannually, and may convene additional meetings as necessary.
“(5) MEMBER ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which a member is first appointed to the Advisory Committee and before the member is granted access to any classified information, the Director shall determine, for the purposes of the Advisory Committee, if the member should be restricted from reviewing, discussing, or possessing classified information.
“(B) ACCESS.—Access to classified materials shall be managed in accordance with Executive Order No. 13526 of December 29, 2009 (75 Fed. Reg. 707), or any subsequent corresponding Executive Order.
“(d) Subcommittees.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director shall establish subcommittees within the Advisory Committee to address cybersecurity issues, which may include the following:
“(2) MEETINGS AND REPORTING.—Each subcommittee shall meet not less frequently than semiannually, and submit to the Advisory Committee for inclusion in the annual report required under subsection (b)(4) information, including activities, findings, and recommendations, regarding subject matter considered by the subcommittee.
(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–296; 116 Stat. 2135), as so amended, is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2215 the following:
“Sec. 2216. Cybersecurity Advisory Committee.”.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(2) the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency within the Department of Homeland Security has the responsibility to manage cyber and physical risks to our critical infrastructure, including by ensuring a national workforce supply to support cybersecurity through education, training, and capacity development efforts;
(b) Authorities.—Section 2202(e)(1) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(R) To encourage and build cybersecurity awareness and competency across the United States and to develop, attract, and retain the cybersecurity workforce necessary for the cybersecurity related missions of the Department, including by—
“(ii) leading efforts to develop, attract, and retain the cybersecurity workforce necessary for the cybersecurity related missions of the Department;
“(iii) encouraging and building cybersecurity awareness and competency across the United States; and
(c) Education, training, and capacity development.—Section 2202(c) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 652(c)) is amended—
(d) Establishment of training programs.—Subtitle A of title XXII of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 651 et seq.), as amended by section 6614 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(a) Establishment.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Cybersecurity Education and Training Assistance Program (referred to in this section as ‘CETAP’) is established within the Agency.
“(b) Requirements.—In carrying out CETAP, the Director shall—
“(c) Briefings.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the establishment of CETAP, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall brief the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives on the program.
(e) Technical and conforming amendment.—The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–296; 116 Stat. 2135), as so amended, is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2216 the following:
“Sec. 2217. Cybersecurity Education and Training Programs.”.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on establishing requirements and protocols to ensure that the ground-based strategic deterrent weapons system is hardened against electromagnetic pulses.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include a description of the following:
(1) The testing protocols the ground-based strategic deterrent program will use for electromagnetic pulse testing.
(2) How requirements for electromagnetic pulse hardness will be integrated into the ground-based strategic deterrent program.
(3) Plans for electromagnetic pulse verification tests of the ground-based strategic deterrent weapons system.
(a) In general.—Subtitle E of title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16271 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 959A. Advanced nuclear reactor research and development goals.
“(a) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) ADVANCED NUCLEAR REACTOR.—The term ‘advanced nuclear reactor’ means—
“(2) DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.—The term ‘demonstration project’ means an advanced nuclear reactor operated in any manner, including as part of the power generation facilities of an electric utility system, for the purpose of demonstrating the suitability for commercial application of the advanced nuclear reactor.
“(b) Purpose.—The purpose of this section is to direct the Secretary, as soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this section, to advance the research and development of domestic advanced, affordable, and clean nuclear energy by—
“(1) demonstrating different advanced nuclear reactor technologies that could be used by the private sector to produce—
“(2) developing subgoals for nuclear energy research programs that would accomplish the goals of the demonstration projects carried out under subsection (c);
“(c) Demonstration projects.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable—
“(2) REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out demonstration projects under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
“(A) include diversity in designs for the advanced nuclear reactors demonstrated under this section, including designs using various—
“(B) seek to ensure that—
“(i) the long-term cost of electricity or heat for each design to be demonstrated under this subsection is cost-competitive in the applicable market;
“(ii) the selected projects can meet the deadline established in paragraph (1) to demonstrate first-of-a-kind advanced nuclear reactor technologies, for which additional information shall be considered, including—
“(C) ensure that each evaluation of candidate technologies for the demonstration projects is completed through an external review of proposed designs, which review shall—
“(D) for federally funded demonstration projects, enter into cost-sharing agreements with private sector partners in accordance with section 988 for the conduct of activities relating to the research, development, and demonstration of private-sector advanced nuclear reactor designs under the program;
“(E) work with private sector partners to identify potential sites, including Department-owned sites, for demonstrations, as appropriate;
“(F) align specific activities carried out under demonstration projects carried out under this subsection with priorities identified through direct consultations between—
“(3) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.—In carrying out demonstration projects under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
“(A) identify candidate technologies that—
“(C) support near-term research and development to address the highest-risk technical challenges to the successful demonstration of a selected advanced reactor technology, in accordance with—
“(D) establish such technology advisory working groups as the Secretary determines to be appropriate to advise the Secretary regarding the technical challenges identified under subparagraph (B) and the scope of research and development programs to address the challenges, in accordance with subparagraph (C), to be comprised of—
“(d) Goals.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish goals for research relating to advanced nuclear reactors facilitated by the Department that support the objectives of the program for demonstration projects established under subsection (c).
“(2) COORDINATION.—In developing the goals under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall coordinate, on an ongoing basis, with members of private industry to advance the demonstration of various designs of advanced nuclear reactors.
“(3) REQUIREMENTS.—In developing the goals under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure that—
“(A) research activities facilitated by the Department to meet the goals developed under this subsection are focused on key areas of nuclear research and deployment ranging from basic science to full-design development, safety evaluation, and licensing;
“(B) research programs designed to meet the goals emphasize—
“(C) activities are carried out that address near-term challenges in modeling and simulation to enable accelerated design and licensing;
“(D) related technologies, such as technologies to manage, reduce, or reuse nuclear waste, are developed;
(b) Table of contents.—The table of contents of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–58; 119 Stat. 594; 132 Stat. 3160) is amended—
(a) In general.—Subtitle E of title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16271 et seq.) (as amended by section 6701(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 959B. Nuclear energy strategic plan.
“(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a 10-year strategic plan for the Office of Nuclear Energy of the Department, in accordance with this section.
“(b) Requirements.—
“(1) COMPONENTS.—The strategic plan under this section shall designate—
“(c) Updates.—Not less frequently than once every 2 years, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committees on Energy and Commerce and Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives an updated 10-year strategic plan in accordance with subsection (b), which shall identify, and provide a justification for, any major deviation from a previous strategic plan submitted under this section.”.
(b) Table of contents.—The table of contents of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–58; 119 Stat. 594; 132 Stat. 3160) (as amended by section 6701(b)(3)) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 959A the following:
“Sec. 959B. Nuclear energy strategic plan.”.
Section 955(c)(1) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16275(c)(1)) is amended—
(a) In general.—Subtitle E of title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16271 et seq.) (as amended by section 6702(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 960. Advanced nuclear fuel security program.
“(a) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) HALEU TRANSPORTATION PACKAGE.—The term ‘HALEU transportation package’ means a transportation package that is suitable for transporting high-assay, low-enriched uranium.
“(b) High-Assay, low-Enriched uranium program for advanced reactors.—
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall establish a program to make available high-assay, low-enriched uranium, through contracts for sale, resale, transfer, or lease, for use in commercial or noncommercial advanced nuclear reactors.
“(2) NUCLEAR FUEL OWNERSHIP.—Each lease under this subsection shall include a provision establishing that the high-assay, low-enriched uranium that is the subject of the lease shall remain the property of the Department, including with respect to responsibility for the storage, use, or final disposition of all radioactive waste created by the irradiation, processing, or purification of any leased high-assay, low-enriched uranium.
“(3) QUANTITY.—In carrying out the program under this subsection, the Secretary shall make available—
“(4) FACTORS FOR CONSIDERATION.—In carrying out the program under this subsection, the Secretary shall take into consideration—
“(A) options for providing the high-assay, low-enriched uranium under this subsection from a stockpile of uranium owned by the Department (including the National Nuclear Security Administration), including—
“(ii) fuel that can meet the needs of an end-user after removing radioactive or other contaminants that resulted from a previous use or fabrication of the fuel for research, development, demonstration, or deployment activities of the Department (including activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration); and
“(B) requirements to support molybdenum-99 production under the American Medical Isotopes Production Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2211).
“(c) Report.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that describes actions proposed to be carried out by the Secretary—
“(2) COORDINATION AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT.—In developing the report under this subsection, the Secretary shall seek input from—
“(3) COST AND SCHEDULE ESTIMATES.—The report under this subsection shall include estimated costs, budgets, and timeframes for enabling the use of high-assay, low-enriched uranium.
“(4) REQUIRED EVALUATIONS.—The report under this subsection shall evaluate—
“(A) the costs and actions required to establish and carry out the program under subsection (b), including with respect to—
“(B) the potential sources and fuel forms available to provide uranium for the program under subsection (b);
“(C) options to coordinate the program under subsection (b) with the operation of the versatile reactor-based fast neutron source under section 955(c)(1);
“(D) the ability of the domestic uranium market to provide materials for advanced nuclear reactor fuel; and
“(d) HALEU transportation package research program.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall establish a research, development, and demonstration program under which the Secretary shall provide financial assistance, on a competitive basis, to establish the capability to transport high-assay, low-enriched uranium.
“(2) REQUIREMENT.—The focus of the program under this subsection shall be to establish 1 or more HALEU transportation packages that can be certified by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to transport high-assay, low-enriched uranium to the various facilities involved in producing or using nuclear fuel containing high-assay, low-enriched uranium, such as—
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–58; 119 Stat. 594; 132 Stat. 3160) (as amended by section 6702(b)) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 959B the following:
“Sec. 960. Advanced nuclear fuel security program.”.
Section 313 of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009 (42 U.S.C. 16274a) is amended to read as follows:
“SEC. 313. University Nuclear Leadership Program.
“(a) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) ADVANCED NUCLEAR REACTOR.—The term ‘advanced nuclear reactor’ means—
“(2) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—The term ‘institution of higher education’ has the meaning given the term in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)).
“(b) Establishment.—The Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration, and the Chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall jointly establish a program, to be known as the ‘University Nuclear Leadership Program’.
“(c) Use of funds.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), amounts made available to carry out the Program shall be used to provide financial assistance for scholarships, fellowships, and research and development projects at institutions of higher education in areas relevant to the programmatic mission of the applicable Federal agency, with an emphasis on providing the financial assistance with respect to research, development, demonstration, and deployment activities for technologies relevant to advanced nuclear reactors, including relevant fuel cycle technologies.
“(2) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), amounts made available to carry out the Program may be used to provide financial assistance for a scholarship, fellowship, or multiyear research and development project that does not align directly with a programmatic mission of the applicable Federal agency providing the financial assistance, if the activity for which assistance is provided would facilitate the maintenance of the discipline of nuclear science or engineering.
(a) Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015.—Section 403(a) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (42 U.S.C. 6241 note; Public Law 114–74) is amended—
(b) Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act.—Section 32204(a)(1) of the FAST Act (42 U.S.C. 6241 note; Public Law 114–94) is amended—
(c) America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018.—Section 3009(a)(1) of America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018 (42 U.S.C. 6241 note; Public Law 115–270) is amended by striking “2028” and inserting “2030.”
(d) Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018.—Section 30204(a)(1) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (42 U.S.C. 6241 note; Public Law 115–123) is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) through (C) and inserting the following:
(e) Reconciliation on the budget for 2018.—Section 20003(a)(1) of Public Law 115–97 (42 U.S.C. 6241 note) is amended by striking “the period of fiscal years 2026 through 2027” and inserting “fiscal year 2030”.
Section 2809(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 is amended—
Subsection (e) of section 2802 is deemed to read as follows:
“(e) Funding.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may expend not more than $15,000,000 for the purposes of planning and design to support the projects described in subsection (a).
(a) In general.—Section 2891c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking the section heading and inserting the following: “Transparency regarding finances and performance metrics”;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(A) in the subsection heading, by inserting “performance metrics and” before “use of incentive fees”;
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking “publicly accessible website, information” and inserting “publicly accessible website—
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter V of chapter 169 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2891c and inserting the following new item:
“2891c. Transparency regarding finances and performance metrics.”.
(a) Interagency executive committee on joint use by Department of the Navy and Department of the Interior of Naval Air Station Fallon Ranges.—Section 3011(a) of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 885) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(5) INTERGOVERNMENTAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.—
“(A) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior shall jointly establish, by memorandum of understanding, an intergovernmental executive committee (referred to in this paragraph as the ‘executive committee’), for the purpose of exchanging views, information, and advice relating to the management of the natural and cultural resources of the land described in paragraph (2).
“(B) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.—The memorandum of understanding entered into under subparagraph (A) shall include—
“(i) a description of the officials and other individuals to be invited to participate as members in the executive committee under subparagraph (C);
“(C) MEMBERSHIP.—The executive committee shall be comprised of—
“(iii) 1 county commissioner from each of Churchill, Lyon, Nye, Mineral, and Pershing Counties, Nevada;
“(D) CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON.—The members of the executive committee shall elect from among the members—
“(E) MEETINGS.—
“(i) FREQUENCY.—The executive committee shall meet not less frequently than 3 times each calendar year.
“(F) CONDITIONS AND TERMS.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Each member of the executive committee shall serve voluntarily and without compensation.
“(ii) TERM OF APPOINTMENT.—
(b) Joint access and use by Department of the Air Force and Department of the Interior of Nevada Test and Training Range and Desert National Wildlife Refuge.—
(1) UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE COORDINATION.—Section 3011(b)(5) of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 887) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(G) INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly establish an interagency committee (referred to in this subparagraph as the ‘interagency committee’) to facilitate coordination, manage public access needs and requirements, and minimize potential conflict between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Air Force with respect to joint operating areas within the Desert National Wildlife Refuge.
“(iii) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The interagency committee shall biannually submit to the Committees on Armed Services, Environment and Public Works, and Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, and make available publicly online, a report on the activities of the interagency committee.”.
(2) INTERGOVERNMENTAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(H) INTERGOVERNMENTAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.—
“(i) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly establish, by memorandum of understanding, an intergovernmental executive committee (referred to in this subparagraph as the ‘executive committee’) in accordance with this subparagraph.
“(ii) PURPOSE.—The executive committee shall be established for the purposes of—
“(iii) COMPOSITION.—The executive committee shall comprise the following members:
“(I) FEDERAL AGENCIES.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall each appoint 1 representative from an interested Federal agency.
“(II) STATE GOVERNMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly invite 1 representative of the Nevada Department of Wildlife.
“(III) LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly invite 1 county commissioner of each of Clark, Nye, and Lincoln Counties, Nevada.
“(IV) TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS.—The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly invite 1 representative of each Indian tribe in the vicinity of the portions of the joint use area of the Desert National Wildlife Refuge where the Secretary of the Interior exercises primary jurisdiction.
“(iv) OPERATION.—The executive committee shall operate in accordance with the terms set forth in the memorandum of understanding under clause (i), which shall specify the officials or other individuals to be invited to participate in the executive committee in accordance with clause (iii).
“(v) PROCEDURES.—Subject to clauses (vi) and (vii), the memorandum of understanding under clause (i) shall establish procedures for—
“(vi) CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON.—
“(vii) MEETINGS.—
“(I) FREQUENCY.—The executive committee shall meet not less frequently than 3 times each calendar year.
“(viii) CONDITIONS AND TERMS OF APPOINTMENT.—
“(I) IN GENERAL.—Each member of the executive committee shall serve voluntarily and without compensation.
“(II) TERM OF APPOINTMENT.—
“(bb) ORIGINAL MEMBERS.—Notwithstanding item (aa), the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Air Force shall select—
“(AA) ½ of the original members of the executive committee to serve for a term of 4 years; and
“(BB) ½ of the original members of the executive committee to serve for a term of 2 years.
“(ix) LIAISONS.—The Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Interior shall each appoint appropriate operational and land management personnel of the Department of the Air Force and the Department of the Interior, respectively, to participate in, and serve as liaisons to, the executive committee.”.
(a) Authority.—The Secretary of the Air Force may extend to the City of Goldsboro the existing lease of the approximately 62-acre Bryan Multi-Sports Complex located in Wayne County, North Carolina, for the purpose of operating a sports and recreation facility for the benefit of both the Air Force and the community.
(b) Duration.—At the option of the Secretary of the Air Force, the lease entered into under this section may be extended for up to 30 additional years with a total lease period not to exceed 50 years.
(c) Payments under the lease.—The Secretary of the Air Force may waive the requirement under section 2667(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, with respect to the lease entered into under this section if the Secretary determines that the lease enhances the quality of life of members of the Armed Forces.
(d) Sense of Senate.—It is the Sense of the Senate regarding the conditions governing the extension of the current lease for the Bryan Multi-Sports Complex that—
(1) the Senate has determined it is in the best interest of the community and the Air Force to extend the lease at no cost;
(2) the current lease allowed the Air Force to close their sports field on Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base and resulted in a savings of $15,000 per year in utilities and grounds maintenance costs;
(3) the current sports complex reduces force protection vulnerability now that the sports complex is located outside the fence line of the installation; and
(4) the facility has improved the quality of life for military families stationed at Seymour-Johnson Air Force Base by allowing members of the Armed Forces and their families to have access to world class sports facilities located adjacent to the installation and on-base privatized housing with easy access by junior enlisted members residing in the dorms.
This division may be cited as the “Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021”.
In this division:
(1) CONGRESSIONAL INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEES.—The term “congressional intelligence committees” has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2021 for the conduct of the intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the following elements of the United States Government:
(a) Specifications of amounts.—The amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 9101 for the conduct of the intelligence activities of the elements listed in paragraphs (1) through (16) of section 9101, are those specified in the classified Schedule of Authorizations prepared to accompany this division.
(b) Availability of classified Schedule of Authorizations.—
(1) AVAILABILITY.—The classified Schedule of Authorizations referred to in subsection (a) shall be made available to the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and to the President.
(2) DISTRIBUTION BY THE PRESIDENT.—Subject to paragraph (3), the President shall provide for suitable distribution of the classified Schedule of Authorizations referred to in subsection (a), or of appropriate portions of such Schedule, within the executive branch of the Federal Government.
(3) LIMITS ON DISCLOSURE.—The President shall not publicly disclose the classified Schedule of Authorizations or any portion of such Schedule except—
(A) as provided in section 601(a) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (50 U.S.C. 3306(a));
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated for the Intelligence Community Management Account of the Director of National Intelligence for fiscal year 2021 the sum of $731,200,000.
(b) Classified authorization of appropriations.—In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Intelligence Community Management Account by subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated for the Intelligence Community Management Account for fiscal year 2021 such additional amounts as are specified in the classified Schedule of Authorizations referred to in section 9102(a).
The authorization of appropriations by this division shall not be deemed to constitute authority for the conduct of any intelligence activity which is not otherwise authorized by the Constitution or the laws of the United States.
Appropriations authorized by this division for salary, pay, retirement, and other benefits for Federal employees may be increased by such additional or supplemental amounts as may be necessary for increases in such compensation or benefits authorized by law.
In carrying out the authorities and responsibilities of the National Manager for National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security under National Security Directive 42 (signed by the President on July 5, 1990), the National Manager shall not supervise, oversee, or execute, either directly or indirectly, any aspect of the National Intelligence Program.
(a) Definition of covered national emergency.—In this section, the term “covered national emergency” means the following:
(1) A major disaster declared by the President under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170).
(2) An emergency declared by the President under section 501 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5191).
(3) A national emergency declared by the President under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).
(4) A public health emergency declared under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).
(b) In general.—The Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Director of the National Reconnaissance Office, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Director of the National Security Agency, and the Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency shall each establish continuity of operations plans for use in the case of covered national emergencies for the element of the intelligence community concerned.
(c) Submission to Congress.—
(1) DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.—Not later than 7 days after the date on which a covered national emergency is declared, the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall each submit to the congressional intelligence committees the plan established under subsection (b) for that emergency for the element of the intelligence community concerned.
(2) DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE, DIRECTOR OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, AND DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY.—Not later than 7 days after the date on which a covered national emergency is declared, the Director of the National Reconnaissance Office, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Director of the National Security Agency, and the Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency shall each submit the plan established under subsection (b) for that emergency for the element of the intelligence community concerned to the following:
(d) Updates.—During a covered national emergency, the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Director of the National Reconnaissance Office, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Director of the National Security Agency, and the Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency shall each submit any updates to the plans submitted under subsection (c)—
(2) in a timely manner consistent with section 501 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091).
Section 5314 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
(a) In general.—Title X of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3191 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“In this subtitle, the term ‘transfer date’ means the date on which the National Intelligence University is transferred from the Defense Intelligence Agency to the Director of National Intelligence under section 5324(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
“SEC. 1032. Degree-granting authority.
“(a) In general.—Beginning on the transfer date, under regulations prescribed by the Director of National Intelligence, the President of the National Intelligence University may, upon the recommendation of the faculty of the University, confer appropriate degrees upon graduates who meet the degree requirements.
“(b) Limitation.—A degree may not be conferred under this section unless—
“(c) Congressional notification requirements.—
“(1) ACTIONS ON NONACCREDITATION.—Beginning on the transfer date, the Director shall promptly—
“SEC. 1033. Faculty members; employment and compensation.
“(a) Authority of Director.—Beginning on the transfer date, the Director of National Intelligence may employ as many professors, instructors, and lecturers at the National Intelligence University as the Director considers necessary.
“(b) Compensation of faculty members.—The compensation of persons employed under this section shall be as prescribed by the Director.
“(c) Compensation plan.—The Director shall provide each person employed as a professor, instructor, or lecturer at the University on the transfer date an opportunity to elect to be paid under the compensation plan in effect on the day before the transfer date (with no reduction in pay) or under the authority of this section.
“SEC. 1034. Acceptance of faculty research grants.
“The Director of National Intelligence may authorize the President of the National Intelligence University to accept qualifying research grants in the same manner and to the same degree as the President of the National Defense University under section 2165(e) of title 10, United States Code.
“SEC. 1035. Continued applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act to the Board of Visitors.
“The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall continue to apply to the Board of Visitors of the National Intelligence University on and after the transfer date.”.
(b) Conforming amendments.—Section 5324 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended—
(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents of the National Security Act of 1947 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1024 the following:
“Subtitle D—National Intelligence University
“Sec. 1031. Transfer date.
“Sec. 1032. Degree-granting authority.
“Sec. 1033. Faculty members; employment and compensation.
“Sec. 1034. Acceptance of faculty research grants.
“Sec. 1035. Continued applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act to the Board of Visitors.”.
(a) Requirement to facilitate establishment.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 5323 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended, by striking “may” and inserting “shall”.
(b) Deadline to facilitate establishment.—Such subsection is further amended by striking “The Director” and inserting “Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the Director”.
(c) Conforming amendments.—
(1) REPORTING.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(a) Standards for data collection.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall establish standards for collecting data relating to attrition in the intelligence community workforce across demographics, specialities, and length of service.
(2) INCLUSION OF CERTAIN CANDIDATES.—The Director shall include, in the standards established under paragraph (1), standards for collecting data from candidates who accepted conditional offers of employment but chose to withdraw from the hiring process before entering into service, including data with respect to the reasons such candidates chose to withdraw.
(b) Collection of data.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each element of the intelligence community shall begin collecting data on workforce and candidate attrition in accordance with the standards established under subsection (a).
(c) Annual report.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Director shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report on workforce and candidate attrition in the intelligence community that includes—
(3) an assessment of timeliness in processing hiring applications of individuals previously employed by an element of the intelligence community, consistent with the Trusted Workforce 2.0 initiative sponsored by the Security Clearance, Suitability, and Credentialing Performance Accountability Council.
(a) In general.—Section 1016(b) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (6 U.S.C. 485(b)), as amended by section 6402(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92), is further amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), in the matter before subparagraph (A), by striking “Director of National Intelligence” and inserting “President”;
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “Director of National Intelligence” both places it appears and inserting “President”; and
Section 6312 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amended by striking subsections (e) through (i) and inserting the following:
The Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 (50 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) is amended by adding the following:
“SEC. 24. Improvement of education in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics.
“(a) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) ELIGIBLE ENTITY.—The term ‘eligible entity’ includes a department or agency of the Federal Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, an individual, and a not-for-profit or other organization in the private sector.
“(2) EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION.—The term ‘educational institution’ includes any public or private elementary school or secondary school, institution of higher education, college, university, or any other profit or nonprofit institution that is dedicated to improving science, technology, engineering, the arts, mathematics, business, law, medicine, or other fields that promote development and education relating to science, technology, engineering, the arts, or mathematics.
“(b) Requirements.—The Director shall, on a continuing basis—
“(c) Authorities.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director, in support of educational programs in science, technology, engineering, the arts, and mathematics, may—
“(2) EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS.—
“(A) NATURE OF ASSISTANCE PROVIDED.—Under an education partnership agreement entered into with an educational institution under paragraph (1)(E), the Director may provide assistance to the educational institution by—
“(i) loaning equipment to the educational institution for any purpose and duration in support of such agreement that the Director considers appropriate;
“(ii) making personnel available to teach science courses or to assist in the development of science courses and materials for the educational institution;
“(iv) involving faculty and students of the educational institution in Agency projects, including research and technology transfer or transition projects;
“(B) PRIORITIES.—In entering into education partnership agreements under paragraph (1)(E), the Director shall prioritize entering into education partnership agreements with the following:
“(i) Historically Black colleges and universities and other minority-serving institutions, as described in section 371(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1067q(a)).
(a) Assessment required.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall assess the efforts of the intelligence community and the Department of Defense to identify and mitigate the risks posed to the intelligence community and the Department by the use of direct-to-consumer genetic testing by the Government of the People's Republic of China.
(b) Report required.—
(1) DEFINITION OF UNITED STATES DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER GENETIC TESTING COMPANY.—In this subsection, the term “United States direct-to-consumer genetic testing company” means a private entity that—
(2) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress, including the congressional intelligence committees, the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, a report on the assessment required by subsection (a).
(3) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (2) shall include the following:
(A) A description of key national security risks and vulnerabilities associated with direct-to-consumer genetic testing, including—
(B) An assessment of the extent to which the intelligence community and the Department have identified risks and vulnerabilities posed by direct-to-consumer genetic testing and have sought to mitigate such risks and vulnerabilities, or have plans for such mitigation, including the extent to which the intelligence community has determined—
(C) Such recommendations as the Comptroller General may have for action by the intelligence community and the Department to improve the identification and mitigation of risks and vulnerabilities posed by the use of direct-to-consumer genetic testing by the Government of the People's Republic of China.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report on how elements of the intelligence community are exercising hiring flexibilities and expedited human resources practices afforded under section 3326 of title 5, United States Code, and subpart D of part 315 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulation, to assure quality and diversity in the workforce of the intelligence community.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report on signals intelligence priorities and requirements subject to Presidential Policy Directive 28.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall cover the following:
(1) The implementation of the annual process for advising the Director on signals intelligence priorities and requirements described in section 3 of Presidential Policy Directive 28.
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the head of each element of the intelligence community shall—
(1) calculate the number of personnel of that element who qualify for a student loan repayment program benefit;
(2) compare the number calculated under paragraph (1) to the number of personnel who apply for such a benefit;
(3) provide recommendations for how to structure such a program to optimize participation and enhance the effectiveness of the benefit as a retention tool, including with respect to the amount of the benefit offered and the length of time an employee receiving a benefit is required to serve under a continuing service agreement; and
(b) Inclusion in fiscal year 2022 budget submission.—The Director of National Intelligence shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget for the intelligence community for fiscal year 2022 (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) a report on the findings of the elements of the intelligence community under subsection (a).
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence, in coordination with the heads of the elements of the intelligence community specified in subsection (b), shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report that includes—
(1) a calculation of the total annual demand for child care by employees of such elements, at or near the workplaces of such employees, including a calculation of the demand for early morning and evening child care;
(2) an identification of any shortfall between the demand calculated under paragraph (1) and the child care supported by such elements as of the date of the report;
(3) an assessment of options for addressing any such shortfall, including options for providing child care at or near the workplaces of employees of such elements;
(4) an identification of the advantages, disadvantages, security requirements, and costs associated with each such option;
(a) Requirement for survey and evaluation of customer feedback.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence, in coordination with the head of each element of the intelligence community, shall—
(b) Requirement for overall strategy and for intelligence community, plan for improving usability of Open Source Enterprise, and risk analysis of creating open source center.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director, in coordination with the head of each element of the intelligence community and using the findings of the Director with respect to the survey conducted under subsection (a), shall—
(1) develop a strategy for open source intelligence collection, analysis, and production that defines the overarching goals, roles, responsibilities, and processes for such collection, analysis, and production for the intelligence community;
(c) Requirement for plan for centralized data repository.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and using the findings of the Director with respect to the survey and evaluation conducted under subsection (a), the strategy and plan developed under subsection (b), and the risk and benefit analysis conducted under such subsection, the Director shall develop a plan for a centralized data repository of open source intelligence that enables all elements of the intelligence community—
(d) Requirement for cost-sharing model.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act and using the findings of the Director with respect to the survey and evaluation conducted under subsection (a), the strategy and plan developed under subsection (b), the risk and benefit analysis conducted under such subsection, and the plan developed under subsection (c), the Director shall develop a cost-sharing model that leverages the open source intelligence investments of each element of the intelligence community for the beneficial use of the entire intelligence community.
(e) Congressional briefing.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the Director of the National Security Agency shall jointly brief the congressional intelligence committees on—
(a) Exclusivity of procedures.—Section 801 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3161) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(c) Exclusivity.—Except as provided in subsection (b) and subject to sections 801A and 801B, the procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) and promulgated and set forth under subpart A of title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulations, shall be the exclusive procedures by which decisions about eligibility for access to classified information are governed.”.
(b) Transparency.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following:
(c) Consistency.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Title VIII of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3161 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 801 the following:
“SEC. 801A. Decisions relating to access to classified information.
“(a) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) AGENCY.—The term ‘agency’ has the meaning given the term ‘Executive agency’ in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.
“(b) In general.—Each head of an agency that makes a determination regarding eligibility for access to classified information shall ensure that in making the determination, the head of the agency or any person acting on behalf of the head of the agency—
“(1) does not violate any right or protection enshrined in the Constitution of the United States, including rights articulated in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments;
“(2) does not discriminate for or against an individual on the basis of race, ethnicity, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or handicap;
“(4) does not violate section 3001(j)(1) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (50 U.S.C. 3341(j)(1)).”.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents in the matter preceding section 2 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3002) is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 801 the following:
“Sec. 801A. Decisions relating to access to classified information.”.
(d) Right to appeal.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Such title, as amended by subsection (c), is further amended by inserting after section 801A the following:
“(a) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) AGENCY.—The term ‘agency’ has the meaning given the term ‘Executive agency’ in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.
“(2) COVERED PERSON.—The term ‘covered person’ means a person, other than the President and Vice President, currently or formerly employed in, detailed to, assigned to, or issued an authorized conditional offer of employment for a position that requires access to classified information by an agency, including the following:
“(3) ELIGIBILITY FOR ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—The term ‘eligibility for access to classified information’ has the meaning given such term in the procedures established pursuant to section 801(a).
“(4) NEED FOR ACCESS.—The term ‘need for access’ has such meaning as the President may define in the procedures established pursuant to section 801(a).
“(5) RECIPROCITY OF CLEARANCE.—The term ‘reciprocity of clearance’, with respect to a denial by an agency, means that the agency, with respect to a covered person—
“(A) failed to accept a security clearance background investigation as required by paragraph (1) of section 3001(d) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (50 U.S.C. 3341(d));
“(B) failed to accept a transferred security clearance background investigation required by paragraph (2) of such section;
“(b) Agency review.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, each head of an agency shall, consistent with the interest of national security, establish and publish in the Federal Register a process by which a covered person to whom eligibility for access to classified information was denied or revoked by the agency or for whom reciprocity of clearance was denied by the agency can appeal that denial or revocation within the agency.
“(2) ELEMENTS.—The process required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
“(A) In the case of a covered person to whom eligibility for access to classified information or reciprocity of clearance is denied or revoked by an agency, the following:
“(i) The head of the agency shall provide the covered person with a written—
“(ii) Not later than 30 days after receiving a request from the covered person for copies of the documents that formed the basis of the agency's decision to revoke or deny, including the investigative file, the head of the agency shall provide to the covered person copies of such documents as—
“(iii) (I) The covered person shall have the opportunity to retain counsel or other representation at the covered person’s expense.
“(II) Upon the request of the covered person, and a showing that the ability to review classified information is essential to the resolution of an appeal under this subsection, counsel or other representation retained under this clause shall be considered for access to classified information for the limited purposes of such appeal.
“(iv) (I) The head of the agency shall provide the covered person an opportunity, at a point in the process determined by the agency head—
“(aa) to appear personally before an adjudicative or other authority, other than the investigating entity, and to present to such authority relevant documents, materials, and information, including evidence that past problems relating to the denial or revocation have been overcome or sufficiently mitigated; and
“(3) AGENCY REVIEW PANELS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Each head of an agency shall establish a panel to hear and review appeals under this subsection.
“(B) MEMBERSHIP.—
“(C) DECISIONS.—
“(i) WRITTEN.—Each decision of a panel established under subparagraph (A) shall be in writing and contain a justification of the decision.
“(ii) CONSISTENCY.—Each head of an agency that establishes a panel under subparagraph (A) shall ensure that each decision of the panel is consistent with the interests of national security and applicable provisions of law.
“(4) REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Each head of an agency shall ensure that, under this subsection, a covered person appealing a decision of the head's agency under this subsection has an opportunity to retain counsel or other representation at the covered person’s expense.
“(B) ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Upon the request of a covered person appealing a decision of an agency under this subsection and a showing that the ability to review classified information is essential to the resolution of the appeal under this subsection, the head of the agency shall sponsor an application by the counsel or other representation retained under this paragraph for access to classified information for the limited purposes of such appeal.
“(5) PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Each head of an agency shall publish each final decision on an appeal under this subsection.
“(B) REQUIREMENTS.—In order to ensure transparency, oversight by Congress, and meaningful information for those who need to understand how the clearance process works, each publication under subparagraph (A) shall be—
“(i) made in a manner that is consistent with section 552 of title 5, United States Code, as amended by the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996 (Public Law 104–231);
“(c) Period of time for the right to appeal.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), any covered person who has been the subject of a decision made by the head of an agency to deny or revoke eligibility for access to classified information shall retain all rights to appeal under this section until the conclusion of the appeals process under this section.
“(d) Waiver of availability of procedures for national security interest.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—If the head of an agency determines that a procedure established under subsection (b) cannot be made available to a covered person in an exceptional case without damaging a national security interest of the United States by revealing classified information, such procedure shall not be made available to such covered person.
“(2) FINALITY.—A determination under paragraph (1) shall be final and conclusive and may not be reviewed by any other official or by any court.
“(3) REPORTING.—
“(A) CASE-BY-CASE.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—In each case in which the head of an agency determines under paragraph (1) that a procedure established under subsection (b) cannot be made available to a covered person, the agency head shall, not later than 30 days after the date on which the agency head makes such determination, submit to the Security Executive Agent and to the congressional intelligence committees a report stating the reasons for the determination.
“(B) ANNUAL REPORTS.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Not less frequently than once each fiscal year, the Security Executive Agent shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report on the determinations made under paragraph (1) during the previous fiscal year.
“(e) Denials and revocations under other provisions of law.—
“(1) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or affect the responsibility and power of the head of an agency to deny or revoke eligibility for access to classified information or to deny reciprocity of clearance in the interest of national security.
“(2) DENIALS AND REVOCATION.—The power and responsibility to deny or revoke eligibility for access to classified information or to deny reciprocity of clearance pursuant to any other provision of law or Executive order may be exercised only when the head of an agency determines that an applicable process established under this section cannot be invoked in a manner that is consistent with national security.
“(3) FINALITY.—A determination under paragraph (2) shall be final and conclusive and may not be reviewed by any other official or by any court.
“(4) REPORTING.—
“(A) CASE-BY-CASE.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—In each case in which the head of an agency determines under paragraph (2) that a determination relating to a denial or revocation of eligibility for access to classified information or denial of reciprocity of clearance could not be made pursuant to a process established under this section, the agency head shall, not later than 30 days after the date on which the agency head makes such a determination under paragraph (2), submit to the Security Executive Agent and to the congressional intelligence committees a report stating the reasons for the determination.
“(B) ANNUAL REPORTS.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Not less frequently than once each fiscal year, the Security Executive Agent shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report on the determinations made under paragraph (2) during the previous fiscal year.
“(f) Relationship to suitability.—No person may use a determination of suitability under part 731 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, or successor regulation, for the purpose of denying a covered person the review proceedings of this section where there has been a denial or revocation of eligibility for access to classified information or a denial of reciprocity of clearance.
“(g) Preservation of roles and responsibilities under Executive Order 10865 and of the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to diminish or otherwise affect the procedures in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act for denial and revocation procedures provided to individuals by Executive Order 10865 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note; relating to safeguarding classified information within industry), or successor order, including those administered through the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Department of Defense under Department of Defense Directive 5220.6, or successor directive.
“(h) Rule of construction relating to certain other provisions of law.—This section and the processes and procedures established under this section shall not be construed to apply to paragraphs (6) and (7) of section 3001(j) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (50 U.S.C. 3341(j)).”.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents in the matter preceding section 2 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3002), as amended by subsection (c), is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 801A the following:
“Sec. 801B. Right to appeal.”.
Subparagraph (C) of section 3001(j)(4) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (50 U.S.C. 3341(j)(4)) is amended to read as follows:
“(C) BURDENS OF PROOF.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause (iii), in determining whether the adverse security clearance or access determination violated paragraph (1), the agency shall find that paragraph (1) was violated if the individual has demonstrated that a disclosure described in paragraph (1) was a contributing factor in the adverse security clearance or access determination taken against the individual.
“(ii) CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.—An individual under clause (i) may demonstrate that the disclosure was a contributing factor in the adverse security clearance or access determination taken against the individual through circumstantial evidence, such as evidence that—
“(iii) DEFENSE.—In determining whether the adverse security clearance or access determination violated paragraph (1), the agency shall not find that paragraph (1) was violated if, after a finding that a disclosure was a contributing factor, the agency demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that it would have made the same security clearance or access determination in the absence of such disclosure.”.
(a) Policy required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Security Executive Agent, in coordination with the principal members of the Performance Accountability Council and the Attorney General, shall issue a policy for the Federal Government on sharing of derogatory information pertaining to contractor employees engaged by the Federal Government.
(b) Consent requirement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The policy issued under subsection (a) shall require, as a condition of accepting a security clearance with the Federal Government, that a contractor employee provide prior written consent for the Federal Government to share covered derogatory information with the chief security officer of the contractor employer that employs the contractor employee.
(2) COVERED DEROGATORY INFORMATION.—For purposes of this section, covered derogatory information—
(A) is information that—
(i) contravenes National Security Adjudicative Guidelines as specified in Security Executive Agent Directive 4 (10 C.F.R. 710 app. A), or any successor Federal policy;
(c) Elements.—The policy issued under subsection (a) shall—
(1) require Federal agencies, except under exceptional circumstances specified by the Security Executive Agent, to share with the contractor employer of a contractor employee engaged with the Federal Government the existence of potentially derogatory information and which National Security Adjudicative Guideline it falls under, with the exception that the Security Executive Agent may waive such requirement in circumstances the Security Executive Agent considers extraordinary;
(2) require that covered derogatory information shared with a contractor employer as described in subsection (b)(1) be used by the contractor employer exclusively for risk mitigation purposes under section 1–202 of the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, or successor manual;
(3) require Federal agencies to share any mitigation measures in place to address the derogatory information;
(5) specify the methods by which covered derogatory information will be shared with the contractor employer of the contractor employee;
(7) establish a procedure by which the contractor employer of the contractor employee may consult with the Federal Government prior to taking any remedial action under section 1–202 of the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, or successor manual, to address the derogatory information the Federal agency has provided;
(d) Consideration of lessons learned from information-sharing program for positions of trust and security clearances.—In developing the policy issued under subsection (a), the Director shall consider, to the extent available, lessons learned from actions taken to carry out section 6611(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Director of the National Security Agency, and the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on attempts by foreign adversaries to build telecommunications and cybersecurity equipment and services for, or to provide such equipment and services to, Five Eyes countries.
(c) Elements.—The report submitted under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of United States intelligence sharing and intelligence and military force posture in any Five Eyes country that currently uses or intends to use telecommunications or cybersecurity equipment or services provided by a foreign adversary of the United States, including China and Russia.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a report on the threats posed by the use by foreign governments and entities of commercially available cyber intrusion and other surveillance technology.
(b) Contents.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(2) A description of which foreign governments and entities pose the greatest threats from the use of technology described in subsection (a) and the nature of those threats.
(3) An assessment of the source of the commercially available cyber intrusion and other surveillance technology that poses the threats described in subsection (a), including whether such technology is made by United States companies or companies in the United States or by foreign companies.
(4) An assessment of actions taken, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, by the Federal Government and foreign governments to limit the export of technology described in subsection (a) from the United States or foreign countries to foreign governments and entities in ways that pose the threats described in such subsection.
(5) Matters relating to how the Federal Government, Congress, and foreign governments can most effectively mitigate the threats described in subsection (a), including matters relating to the following:
(a) Appropriate committees of Congress.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(b) Reports required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each head of an agency described in subsection (c) shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the recommendations included in the report issued by the Cyberspace Solarium Commission under section 1652(k) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232).
(a) Assessment required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall complete a detailed assessment of critical technology trends relating to artificial intelligence, microchips, and semiconductors and related supply chains.
(b) Elements.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) EXPORT CONTROLS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—An assessment of efforts by partner countries to enact and implement export controls and other technology transfer measures with respect to artificial intelligence, microchips, advanced manufacturing equipment, and other artificial intelligence enabled technologies critical to United States supply chains.
(2) SEMICONDUCTOR SUPPLY CHAINS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—An assessment of global semiconductor supply chains, including areas to reduce United States vulnerabilities and maximize points of leverage.
(B) ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS.—The assessment under subparagraph (A) shall include an analysis of the potential effects of significant geopolitical shifts, including those related to Taiwan.
(C) IDENTIFICATION OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR DIVERSIFICATION.—The assessment under subparagraph (A) shall also identify opportunities for diversification of United States supply chains, including an assessment of cost, challenges, and opportunities to diversify manufacturing capabilities on a multinational basis.
(3) COMPUTING POWER.—An assessment of trends relating to computing power and the effect of such trends on global artificial intelligence development and implementation, in consultation with the Director of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, including forward-looking assessments of how computing resources may affect United States national security, innovation, and implementation relating to artificial intelligence.
(c) Report.—
(1) DEFINITION OF APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(a) Updates to annual reports on influence operations and campaigns in the United States by the Chinese Communist Party.—Section 1107(b) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3237(b)) is amended—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (7) the following:
“(8) An identification of influence activities and operations employed by the Chinese Communist Party against the United States science and technology sectors, specifically employees of the United States Government, researchers, scientists, and students in the science and technology sector in the United States.”.
(b) Plan for Federal Bureau of Investigation to increase public awareness and detection of influence activities by the Government of the People's Republic of China.—
(1) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees a plan—
(c) Recommendations of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to strengthen relationships and build trust with communities of interest.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in consultation with the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division and the Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer of the Department of Justice, shall develop recommendations to strengthen relationships with communities targeted by influence activities of the Government of the People's Republic of China and build trust with such communities through local and regional grassroots outreach.
(d) Technical corrections.—The National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 1107 (50 U.S.C. 3237)—
(2) in the table of contents before section 2 (50 U.S.C. 3002), by striking the item relating to section 1107 and inserting the following new item:
“Sec. 1107. Annual reports on influence operations and campaigns in the United States by the Chinese Communist Party.”.
(a) Definition of appropriate committees of Congress.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(b) Annual report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through 2025, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the corruption and corrupt activities of senior officials of the Chinese Communist Party.
(2) ELEMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(i) A description of the wealth of, and corruption and corrupt activities among, senior officials of the Chinese Communist Party.
(3) COORDINATION.—In preparing each report, update, or supplement under this subsection, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall coordinate as follows:
(a) Definition of appropriate committees of Congress.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(b) Report required.—Not later than 100 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress and the Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs a report on the corruption and corrupt activities of Russian and other Eastern European oligarchs.
(c) Elements.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Each report under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(A) A description of corruption and corrupt activities among Russian and other Eastern European oligarchs who support the Government of the Russian Federation, including estimates of the total assets of such oligarchs.
(B) An assessment of the impact of the corruption and corrupt activities described pursuant to subparagraph (A) on the economy and citizens of Russia.
(C) A description of any connections to, or support of, organized crime, drug smuggling, or human trafficking by an oligarch covered by subparagraph (A).
(d) Coordination.—In preparing each report, update, or supplement under this section, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall coordinate as follows:
(1) In preparing the assessment and descriptions required by subparagraphs (A) through (D) of subsection (c)(1), the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shall coordinate with the head of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of the Treasury and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(2) CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE.—The term “critical infrastructure” has the meaning given such term in section 1016(e) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e)).
(b) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report identifying whether and how officials of the Chinese Communist Party and the Government of the People's Republic of China may have sought—
(c) Assessments.—The report required by subsection (b) shall include assessments of reported actions and the effect of those actions on efforts to contain the novel coronavirus pandemic, including each of the following:
(1) The origins of the novel coronavirus outbreak, the time and location of initial infections, and the mode and speed of early viral spread.
(2) Actions taken by the Government of China to suppress, conceal, or misinform the people of China and those of other countries about the novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan.
(3) The effect of disinformation or the failure of the Government of China to fully disclose details of the outbreak on response efforts of local governments in China and other countries.
(4) Diplomatic, political, economic, intelligence, or other pressure on other countries and international organizations to conceal information about the spread of the novel coronavirus and the response of the Government of China to the contagion, as well as to influence or coerce early responses to the pandemic by other countries.
(5) Efforts by officials of the Government of China to deny access to health experts and international health organizations to afflicted individuals in Wuhan, pertinent areas of the city, or laboratories of interest in China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
(6) Efforts by the Government of China, or those acting at its direction or with its assistance, to conduct cyber operations against international, national, or private health organizations conducting research relating to the novel coronavirus or operating in response to the pandemic.
(7) Efforts to control, restrict, or manipulate relevant segments of global supply chains, particularly in the sale, trade, or provision of relevant medicines, medical supplies, or medical equipment as a result of the pandemic.
(8) Efforts to advance the economic, intelligence, national security, and political objectives of the Government of China by exploiting vulnerabilities of foreign governments, economies, and companies under financial duress as a result of the pandemic or to accelerate economic espionage and intellectual property theft.
(9) Efforts to exploit the disruption of the pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries as well as other industries tied to critical infrastructure and bilateral trade between China and the United States and between China and allies and partners of the United States in order to advance the economic and political objectives of the Government of China following the pandemic.
(a) Definition of appropriate committees of Congress.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(b) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, in consultation with such heads of other elements of the intelligence community as the Director considers appropriate, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on—
(c) Contents.—The report submitted under subsection (b) shall include assessments relating to plans of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran to acquire additional weapons, the intention of other countries to provide such weapons, and the effect such acquisition and provision would have on regional stability, including with respect to each of the following:
(3) Likely reactions of other countries in the region to such acquisition, including the potential for proliferation by other countries in response.
(4) The threat that such acquisition could present to international commerce and energy supplies in the region, and the potential implications for the national security of the United States.
(5) The threat that such acquisition could present to the Armed Forces of the United States, of countries allied with the United States, and of countries partnered with the United States stationed in or deployed in the region.
(a) Definition of appropriate committees of Congress.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(b) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report assessing—
(c) Assessments.—The report required by subsection (b) shall include assessments, for the period beginning on January 1, 2018, and ending on the date of the submittal of the report, of the following:
(1) Activities to research, develop, or enrich uranium or reprocess plutonium with the intent or capability of creating weapons-grade nuclear material.
(2) Research, development, testing, or design activities that could contribute to or inform construction of a device intended to initiate or capable of initiating a nuclear explosion.
It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1) the work of the Third Option Foundation to heal, help, and honor members of the special operations community of the Central Intelligence Agency and their families is invaluable; and
(2) the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency should work closely with the Third Option Foundation in implementing section 19A of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 (50 U.S.C. 3519b), as added by section 6412 of the Damon Paul Nelson and Matthew Young Pollard Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 2018, 2019, and 2020 (Public Law 116–92).
Attest:
Secretary
| |||||
AMENDMENT | |||||