Bill Sponsor
House Bill 1470
117th Congress(2021-2022)
Ending Qualified Immunity Act
Introduced
Introduced
Introduced in House on Mar 1, 2021
Overview
Text
Introduced
Mar 1, 2021
Latest Action
Apr 28, 2021
Origin Chamber
House
Type
Bill
Bill
The primary form of legislative measure used to propose law. Depending on the chamber of origin, bills begin with a designation of either H.R. or S. Joint resolution is another form of legislative measure used to propose law.
Bill Number
1470
Congress
117
Policy Area
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Primary focus of measure is discrimination on basis of race, ethnicity, age, sex, gender, health or disability; First Amendment rights; due process and equal protection; abortion rights; privacy. Measures concerning abortion rights and procedures may fall under Health policy area.
Sponsorship by Party
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
District of Columbia
Democrat
Illinois
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Michigan
Democrat
Minnesota
Democrat
Missouri
Democrat
North Carolina
Democrat
North Carolina
Democrat
Virginia
Democrat
Washington
Democrat
Washington
Democrat
Washington
House Votes (0)
Senate Votes (0)
No House votes have been held for this bill.
Summary

Ending Qualified Immunity Act

This bill eliminates the defense of qualified immunity in civil actions for deprivation of rights. Qualified immunity is a judicially created doctrine that protects government employees or those acting with state authority from being held personally liable for constitutional violations.

The bill provides that under the statute allowing a civil action alleging deprivation of rights under color of law, it shall not be a defense or immunity to any such action that (1) the defendant was acting in good faith or believed that his or her conduct was lawful at the time it was committed; (2) the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution or federal laws were not clearly established at the time of their deprivation; or (3) the state of the law was such that the defendant could not reasonably have been expected to know whether his or her conduct was lawful.

Text (1)
March 1, 2021
Actions (3)
04/28/2021
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
03/01/2021
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
03/01/2021
Introduced in House
Public Record
Record Updated
Jan 11, 2023 1:46:26 PM