Bill Sponsor
House Bill 3222
115th Congress(2017-2018)
Do No Harm Act
Introduced
Introduced
Introduced in House on Jul 13, 2017
Overview
Text
Introduced
Jul 13, 2017
Latest Action
Aug 3, 2017
Origin Chamber
House
Type
Bill
Bill
The primary form of legislative measure used to propose law. Depending on the chamber of origin, bills begin with a designation of either H.R. or S. Joint resolution is another form of legislative measure used to propose law.
Bill Number
3222
Congress
115
Policy Area
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Primary focus of measure is discrimination on basis of race, ethnicity, age, sex, gender, health or disability; First Amendment rights; due process and equal protection; abortion rights; privacy. Measures concerning abortion rights and procedures may fall under Health policy area.
Sponsorship by Party
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
California
Democrat
Colorado
Democrat
Connecticut
Democrat
Connecticut
Democrat
Connecticut
Democrat
Connecticut
Democrat
Connecticut
Democrat
District of Columbia
Democrat
Florida
Democrat
Florida
Democrat
Illinois
Democrat
Illinois
Democrat
Illinois
Democrat
Illinois
Democrat
Kentucky
Democrat
Maryland
Democrat
Maryland
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Massachusetts
Democrat
Michigan
Democrat
Michigan
Democrat
Michigan
Democrat
Minnesota
Democrat
Minnesota
Democrat
Mississippi
Democrat
New Hampshire
Democrat
New Hampshire
Democrat
New Jersey
Democrat
New Jersey
Democrat
New Jersey
Democrat
New Jersey
Democrat
New Jersey
Democrat
New Mexico
Democrat
New York
Democrat
New York
Democrat
New York
Democrat
New York
Democrat
New York
Democrat
New York
Democrat
New York
Democrat
New York
Democrat
North Carolina
Democrat
North Carolina
Democrat
Pennsylvania
Democrat
Pennsylvania
Democrat
Pennsylvania
Democrat
Pennsylvania
Democrat
Pennsylvania
Democrat
Pennsylvania
Democrat
Rhode Island
Democrat
Rhode Island
Democrat
Tennessee
Democrat
Tennessee
Democrat
Virginia
Democrat
Virginia
Democrat
Washington
Democrat
Washington
Democrat
Washington
Democrat
Washington
Democrat
Washington
Democrat
Washington
Democrat
Wisconsin
Democrat
Wisconsin
House Votes (0)
Senate Votes (0)
No House votes have been held for this bill.
Summary

Do No Harm Act

This bill makes the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) inapplicable to federal laws (or implementations of laws) that:

  • protect against discrimination or the promotion of equal opportunity, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, Executive Order 11246 (concerning equal employment opportunity), the Violence Against Women Act, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's) rules entitled "Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity";
  • require employers to provide wages, other compensation, or benefits, including leave;
  • protect collective activity in the workplace;
  • protect against child labor, abuse, or exploitation; or
  • provide for access to, information about, referrals for, provision of, or coverage for, any health care item or service.

Under current law, RFRA prohibits the government from substantially burdening a person's exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, except in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest when using the least restrictive means.

The bill makes RFRA inapplicable to: (1) terms requiring goods, services, functions, or activities to be performed or provided to beneficiaries of government contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, or awards; or (2) denials of a person's full and equal enjoyment of a government-provided good, service, benefit, facility, privilege, advantage, or accommodation.

To assert a RFRA claim or defense in a judicial proceeding, the government must be a party to the proceeding.

Text (1)
July 13, 2017
Actions (3)
08/03/2017
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
07/13/2017
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
07/13/2017
Introduced in House
Public Record
Record Updated
Jan 11, 2023 1:37:27 PM