Calendar No. 23
116th CONGRESS 1st Session |
To require the treatment of a lapse in appropriations as a mitigating condition when assessing financial considerations for security clearances, and for other purposes.
February 12, 2019
Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Jones, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Kaine, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Cortez Masto, Ms. Hassan, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time
February 13, 2019
Read the second time and placed on the calendar
To require the treatment of a lapse in appropriations as a mitigating condition when assessing financial considerations for security clearances, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
This Act may be cited as the “Protecting Employees’ Security Clearances Act of 2019”.
SEC. 2. Treatment of lapse in appropriations as mitigating condition in financial consideration for security clearances.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) AGENCY.—The term “agency” has the meaning given the term “Executive agency” in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.
(2) COVERED EMPLOYEE.—the term “covered employee”—
(i) an officer or employee of the United States Government furloughed during a lapse in appropriations; and
(ii) an excepted employee or an employee performing emergency work, as such terms are defined by the Office of Personnel Management; and
(B) includes a contractor of an agency subject to a lapse in appropriations.
(3) NATIONAL SECURITY ELIGIBILITY.—The term “national security eligibility” has the meaning given such term in Security Executive Agent Directive 4 (relating to National Security Adjudicative Guidelines), as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(4) SECURITY EXECUTIVE AGENT.—The term “Security Executive Agent” means the official acting as the Security Executive Agent in accordance with Executive Order 13467 (73 Fed. Reg. 38103; 50 U.S.C. 3161 note; relating to reforming processes related to suitability for government employment, fitness for contractor employees, and eligibility for access to classified national security information), or successor order.
(b) In general.—Whenever the head of an agency determines whether to grant a covered employee national security eligibility or continue a covered employee's national security eligibility, the head shall consider a lapse in appropriations a condition that could mitigate a security concern with respect to financial considerations.
(c) Credit scores or negative information in a consumer credit file.—No head of an agency may revoke the national security eligibility of a covered employee because of a reduction in the credit score or negative information in a consumer credit file of the covered employee that is attributable to disrupted income payments as a result of a lapse in appropriations.
(d) Modification of policies, guidelines, and directives.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Security Executive Agent shall revise such policies, guidelines, and directives, including the Security Executive Agent Directive 4 (relating to National Security Adjudicative Guidelines), or successor directive, as may be necessary to carry out this section.
Calendar No. 23 | |||||
| |||||
A BILL | |||||
To require the treatment of a lapse in appropriations as a mitigating condition when assessing
financial considerations for security clearances, and for other purposes. | |||||
February 13, 2019 | |||||
Read the second time and placed on the calendar |