Union Calendar No. 88
116th CONGRESS 1st Session |
[Report No. 116–120]
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2020 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.
May 2, 2019
Mr. Smith of Washington (for himself and Mr. Thornberry) (both by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services
June 19, 2019
Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 2, 2019]
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2020 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
This Act may be cited as the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020”.
(b) Table of contents.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.
Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 111. Modification of annual report on cost targets for certain aircraft carriers.
Sec. 112. Repeal of requirement to adhere to Navy cost estimates for certain aircraft carriers.
Sec. 113. Ford class aircraft carrier support for F–35C aircraft.
Sec. 114. Prohibition on use of funds for reduction of aircraft carrier force structure.
Sec. 115. Design and construction of amphibious transport dock designated LPD–31.
Sec. 116. Limitation on availability of funds pending quarterly updates on the CH–53K King Stallion helicopter program.
Sec. 117. Limitation on availability of funds for VH–92A helicopter.
Sec. 118. National Defense Reserve Fleet Vessel.
Sec. 121. Modification of requirement to preserve certain C–5 aircraft.
Sec. 122. Modification of limitation on use of funds for KC–46A aircraft.
Sec. 123. F–15EX aircraft program.
Sec. 124. Prohibition on availability of funds for reduction in KC–10 primary mission aircraft inventory.
Sec. 125. Limitation on availability of funds for VC–25B aircraft.
Sec. 126. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of RC–135 aircraft.
Sec. 127. Report on aircraft fleet of the Civil Air Patrol.
Sec. 131. Economic order quantity contracting and buy-to-budget acquisition for F–35 aircraft program.
Sec. 132. Program requirements for the F–35 aircraft program.
Sec. 133. Reports on F–35 aircraft program.
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 211. Program on enhancement of preparation of dependents of members of Armed Forces for careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
Sec. 212. Temporary inclusion of joint artificial intelligence center of the Department of Defense in personnel management authority to attract experts in science and engineering.
Sec. 213. Joint Hypersonics Transition Office.
Sec. 214. Modification of proof of concept commercialization program.
Sec. 215. Contract for national security research studies.
Sec. 216. JASON Scientific Advisory Group.
Sec. 217. Direct Air Capture and Blue Carbon Removal Technology Program.
Sec. 218. Foreign malign influence operations research program.
Sec. 219. Sensor data integration for fifth generation aircraft.
Sec. 220. Documentation relating to Advanced Battle Management System.
Sec. 221. Documentation relating to B–52 commercial engine replacement program.
Sec. 222. Diversification of the science, technology, research, and engineering workforce of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 223. Policy on the talent management of digital expertise and software professionals.
Sec. 224. Development and implementation of digital engineering capability and automated software testing and evaluation.
Sec. 225. Process to align policy formulation and emerging technology development.
Sec. 226. Limitation on transition of Strategic Capabilities Office of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 231. Master plan for implementation of authorities relating to science and technology reinvention laboratories.
Sec. 232. Master plan for infrastructure required to support research, development, test, and evaluation missions.
Sec. 233. Strategy and implementation plan for fifth generation information and communications technologies.
Sec. 234. Department-wide software science and technology strategy.
Sec. 235. Artificial intelligence education strategy.
Sec. 236. Biannual report on the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center.
Sec. 237. Quarterly updates on the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program.
Sec. 238. Grants for civics education programs.
Sec. 239. Technology and national security fellowship.
Sec. 240. National Security Commission on Defense Research at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Other Minority Institutions.
Sec. 301. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 311. Timeline for Clearinghouse review of applications for energy projects that may have an adverse impact on military operations and readiness.
Sec. 312. Authority to make final finding on designation of geographic areas of concern for purposes of energy projects with adverse impacts on military operations and readiness.
Sec. 313. Authority to accept contributions of funds from applicants for energy projects for mitigation of impacts on military operations and readiness.
Sec. 314. Department of Defense improvement of previously conveyed utility systems serving military installations.
Sec. 315. Five-year authority for National Guard environmental restoration projects for environmental responses.
Sec. 316. Sale of electricity from alternate energy and cogeneration production facilities.
Sec. 317. Transfer authority for funding of study and assessment on health implications of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances contamination in drinking water by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Sec. 318. Replacement of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam with fluorine-free fire-fighting agent.
Sec. 319. Prohibition of uncontrolled release of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam at military installations.
Sec. 320. Prohibition on use of fluorinated aqueous film forming foam for training exercises.
Sec. 321. Real-time noise-monitoring study at Navy and Air Force installations where tactical fighter aircraft operate.
Sec. 322. Development of climate vulnerability and risk assessment tool.
Sec. 323. Provision of uncontaminated water for agricultural use on land contaminated by PFOS and PFOA used on military installations.
Sec. 331. Material readiness metrics and objectives.
Sec. 332. Clarification of authority regarding use of working capital funds for unspecified minor military construction projects related to revitalization and recapitalization of defense industrial base facilities.
Sec. 333. F–35 Joint Strike Fighter sustainment.
Sec. 334. Report on strategic policy for prepositioned materiel and equipment.
Sec. 335. Limitation on use of funds for implementation of elements of master plan for redevelopment of Former Ship Repair Facility in Guam.
Sec. 341. Readiness reporting.
Sec. 342. Extension of deadline for transition from service-specific defense readiness reporting systems.
Sec. 343. Report on Navy ship depot maintenance budget.
Sec. 344. Report on Runit Dome.
Sec. 351. Inclusion of over-the-horizon radars in early outreach procedures.
Sec. 352. Extension of authority for Secretary of Defense to use Department of Defense reimbursement rate for transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense entities.
Sec. 353. Expanded transfer and adoption of military animals.
Sec. 354. Extension of authority of Secretary of Transportation to issue non-premium aviation insurance.
Sec. 355. Defense personal property program.
Sec. 356. Public events about Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility.
Sec. 357. Sense of Congress regarding Innovative Readiness Training program.
Sec. 358. Pilot program on reduction of effects of military aviation noise on private residences.
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Sec. 402. Revisions in permanent active duty end strength minimum levels.
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for reserves on active duty in support of the reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support.
Sec. 421. Military personnel.
Sec. 501. Management policies for joint qualified officers.
Sec. 502. Grade of Chief of the Veterinary Corps of the Army.
Sec. 503. Authority of promotion boards to recommend that officers of particular merit be placed higher on promotion list.
Sec. 504. Availability on the internet of certain information about officers serving in general or flag officer grades.
Sec. 511. Grade of certain chiefs of reserve components.
Sec. 512. Authority to defer mandatory separation at age 68 of officers in medical specialties in the reserve components.
Sec. 513. Repeal of requirement for review of certain Army Reserve officer unit vacancy promotions by commanders of associated active duty units.
Sec. 514. Guidance for use of unmanned aircraft systems by the National Guard.
Sec. 515. Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps.
Sec. 516. JROTC computer science and cybersecurity program.
Sec. 517. Programs of scholarships for members of Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps units toward obtaining private pilot's certificates.
Sec. 518. Sense of Congress regarding Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.
Sec. 519. Sense of Congress regarding the National Guard Youth Challenge Program.
Sec. 521. Establishment of board of appeals regarding denied requests for upgraded discharges and dismissals.
Sec. 522. Prohibition on reduction in the number of personnel assigned to duty with a service review agency.
Sec. 523. Advisory committee on record and service review boards.
Sec. 524. Time requirements for certification of honorable service.
Sec. 525. Prohibition on implementation of military service suitability determinations for foreign nationals who are lawful permanent residents.
Sec. 526. Strategic plan for diversity and inclusion.
Sec. 527. Independent study on barriers to entry into the Armed Forces for English learners.
Sec. 528. Reenlistment waivers for persons separated from the Armed Forces who commit one misdemeanor cannabis offense.
Sec. 529. Sense of Congress regarding accession physicals.
Sec. 531. Command influence.
Sec. 532. Statute of limitations for certain offenses.
Sec. 533. Guidelines on sentences for offenses committed under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 534. Expansion of responsibilities of commanders for victims of sexual assault committed by another member of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 535. Increase in investigative personnel and Victim Witness Assistance Program liaisons.
Sec. 536. Increase in number of digital forensic examiners for the military criminal investigation organizations.
Sec. 537. Pilot programs on defense investigators in the military justice system.
Sec. 538. Pilot program on prosecution of special victim offenses committed by attendees of military service academies.
Sec. 539. Timely disposition of nonprosecutable sex-related offenses.
Sec. 540. Training for sexual assault initial disposition authorities on exercise of disposition authority for sexual assault and collateral offenses.
Sec. 541. Standard of evidence applicable to investigations and reviews related to protected communications of members of the Armed Forces and prohibited retaliatory actions.
Sec. 542. Expansion of Special Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related or domestic violence offenses.
Sec. 543. Notification of issuance of military protective order to civilian law enforcement.
Sec. 544. Clarifications regarding scope of employment and reemployment rights of members of the uniformed services.
Sec. 545. Military orders required for termination of leases pursuant to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.
Sec. 546. Consultation regarding victim's preference in prosecution jurisdiction.
Sec. 547. Extension and expansion of Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 548. Defense Advisory Committee for the Prevention of Sexual Misconduct.
Sec. 549. Safe to report policy applicable across the Armed Forces.
Sec. 550. Availability of Special Victims’ Counsel and special victim prosecutors at military installations.
Sec. 550a. Notice to victims of alleged sexual assault of pendency of further administrative action following a determination not to refer to trial by court-martial.
Sec. 550b. Training for Special Victims' Counsel on civilian criminal justice matters in the States of the military installations to which assigned.
Sec. 551. Authority for detail of certain enlisted members of the Armed Forces as students at law schools.
Sec. 552. Education of members of the Armed Forces on career readiness and professional development.
Sec. 553. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center.
Sec. 554. Expansion of Department of Defense STARBASE Program.
Sec. 555. Degree granting authority for United States Army Armament Graduate School.
Sec. 556. Congressional nominations for Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps scholarships.
Sec. 557. Consideration of application for transfer for a student of a military service academy who is the victim of a sexual assault or related offense.
Sec. 558. Redesignation of the Commandant of the United States Air Force Institute of Technology as the Director and Chancellor of such Institute.
Sec. 559. Eligibility of additional enlisted members for associate degree programs of the Community College of the Air Force.
Sec. 560. Safe-to-report policy applicable to military service academies.
Sec. 560a. Recoupment of funds from cadets and midshipmen separated for criminal misconduct.
Sec. 561. Prohibition on gender-segregated training at Marine Corps Recruit Depots.
Sec. 562. Medical personnel at Marine Corps Recruit Depots.
Sec. 563. Assessment of deaths of recruits under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy.
Sec. 564. Inclusion of specific email address block on Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214).
Sec. 565. Machine readability and electronic transferability of Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214).
Sec. 566. Records of service for reserves.
Sec. 571. Authorizing members to take leave for a birth or adoption in more than one increment.
Sec. 572. Deferred deployment for members who give birth.
Sec. 573. Authority of the Secretary concerned to transport remains of a covered decedent to no more than two places selected by the person designated to direct disposition of the remains.
Sec. 574. Clarification regarding eligibility to transfer entitlement under Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program.
Sec. 575. Absentee ballot tracking program.
Sec. 576. Annual State report card.
Sec. 577. Transportation of remains of casualties; travel expenses for next of kin.
Sec. 578. Meetings of officials of the Department of Defense with survivors of deceased members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 579. Direct employment pilot program for members of the National Guard and Reserve, veterans, their spouses and dependents, and members of Gold Star Families.
Sec. 580. Continued assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students.
Sec. 581. Expansion of Gold Star Lapel Button Eligibility to stepsiblings; free replacement.
Sec. 582. Establishment of the Atomic Veterans Service Medal.
Sec. 583. Review of World War I valor medals.
Sec. 591. Repeal of quarterly report on end strengths.
Sec. 592. Revision of Workplace and Gender Relations Surveys.
Sec. 593. Modification of elements of reports on the improved Transition Assistance Program.
Sec. 594. Questions in workplace surveys regarding supremacist, extremist, and racist activity.
Sec. 595. Command matters in connection with transition assistance programs.
Sec. 596. Expressing support for the designation of a “Gold Star Families Remembrance Day”.
Sec. 601. Clarification of continuation of pays during hospitalization and rehabilitation resulting from wounds, injury, or illness incurred while on duty in a hostile fire area or exposed to an event of hostile fire or other hostile action.
Sec. 602. Basic needs allowance for low-income regular members.
Sec. 603. Temporary increase of rates of basic allowance for housing following determination that local civilian housing costs significantly exceed such rates.
Sec. 604. Basic allowance for housing for a member without dependents when relocation would financially disadvantage the member.
Sec. 605. Partial dislocation allowance.
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain expiring bonus and special pay authorities.
Sec. 621. Payment of transitional compensation for certain dependents.
Sec. 622. Death gratuity for ROTC graduates.
Sec. 623. Continued eligibility for education and training opportunities for spouses of promoted members.
Sec. 624. Occupational improvements for relocated spouses of members of the uniformed services.
Sec. 625. Expansion of authority to provide financial assistance to civilian providers of child care services or youth program services who provide such services to survivors of members of the Armed Forces who die in line of duty.
Sec. 626. Space-available travel on military aircraft for children and surviving spouses of members who die of hostile action or training duty.
Sec. 627. Consideration of service on active duty to reduce age of eligibility for retired pay for non-regular service.
Sec. 628. Modification to authority to reimburse for State licensure and certification costs of a spouse of a member arising from relocation.
Sec. 629. Improvements to child care for members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 630. Casualty assistance for survivors of deceased ROTC graduates.
Sec. 631. GAO review of defense resale optimization study.
Sec. 701. Contraception coverage parity under the TRICARE program.
Sec. 702. Pregnancy prevention assistance at military medical treatment facilities for sexual assault survivors.
Sec. 703. Modification of eligibility for TRICARE Reserve Select for certain members of the Selected Reserve.
Sec. 704. Lead level screenings and testings for children.
Sec. 705. Exposure to open burn pits and toxic airborne chemicals or other airborne contaminants as part of periodic health assessments and other physical examinations.
Sec. 706. Enhancement of recordkeeping and postdeployment medical assessment requirements related to occupational and environmental hazard exposure during deployment.
Sec. 707. Modifications to post-deployment mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces deployed in support of a contingency operation.
Sec. 708. Provision of blood testing for firefighters of Department of Defense to determine exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Sec. 711. Requirements for certain prescription drug labels.
Sec. 712. Officers authorized to command Army dental units.
Sec. 713. Improvements to leadership of interagency program office of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Sec. 714. Inclusion of blast exposure history in medical records of members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 715. Comprehensive policy for provision of mental health care to members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 716. Limitation on the realignment or reduction of military medical manning end strength.
Sec. 717. Strategy to recruit and retain mental health providers.
Sec. 718. Monitoring medication prescribing practices for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Sec. 721. Establishment of military dental research program.
Sec. 722. Pilot program on cryopreservation and storage.
Sec. 723. Encouragement of participation in Women’s Health Transition Training pilot program.
Sec. 724. National Guard suicide prevention pilot program.
Sec. 725. Reports on suicide among members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 726. Study on military-civilian integrated health delivery systems.
Sec. 727. Study on case management at military medical treatment facilities.
Sec. 728. Study on infertility among members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 801. Establishment of acquisition pathways for software applications and software upgrades.
Sec. 802. Software development and software acquisition training and management programs.
Sec. 803. Modifications to cost or pricing data for certain procurements.
Sec. 804. Modifications to cost or pricing data on below-threshold contracts.
Sec. 805. Comptroller General report on price reasonableness.
Sec. 806. Requirement that certain ship components be manufactured in the national technology and industrial base.
Sec. 807. Acquisition and disposal of certain rare earth materials.
Sec. 808. Prohibition on acquisition of tantalum from non-allied foreign nations.
Sec. 809. Application of miscellaneous technology base policies and programs to the Columbia-class submarine program.
Sec. 810. Application of limitation on procurement of goods other than United States goods to the FFG–Frigate Program.
Sec. 811. Consideration of price in procurement of the FFG(X) frigate.
Sec. 812. Repeal of continuation of data rights during challenges.
Sec. 813. Repeal of authority to waive acquisition laws to acquire vital national security capabilities.
Sec. 814. Repeal of transfer of funds related to cost overruns and cost underruns.
Sec. 821. Modifications to the middle tier of acquisition programs.
Sec. 822. Briefing relating to the “middle tier” of acquisition programs.
Sec. 823. Rates for progress payments or performance-based payments.
Sec. 824. Additional requirements for negotiations for noncommercial computer software.
Sec. 825. Responsibility for data analysis and requirements validation for services contracts.
Sec. 826. Annual reports on authority to carry out certain prototype projects.
Sec. 827. Competition requirements for purchases from Federal Prison Industries.
Sec. 828. Enhanced post-award debriefing rights.
Sec. 829. Standardizing data collection and reporting on use of source selection procedures by Federal agencies.
Sec. 830. Modification of justification and approval requirement for certain Department of Defense contracts.
Sec. 841. Defense acquisition workforce certification and education requirements.
Sec. 842. Public-private exchange program for the acquisition workforce.
Sec. 843. Incentives and consideration for qualified training programs.
Sec. 844. Certification by prospective military construction contractors of good faith effort to utilize qualified apprentices.
Sec. 851. Supply chain security of certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment.
Sec. 852. Assured security against intrusion on United States military networks.
Sec. 853. Revised authorities to defeat adversary efforts to compromise United States defense capabilities.
Sec. 854. Prohibition on operation or procurement of foreign-made unmanned aircraft systems.
Sec. 855. Supply chain risk mitigation policies to be implemented through requirements generation process.
Sec. 861. Modifications to the defense acquisition system.
Sec. 871. Consideration of subcontracting to minority institutions.
Sec. 872. Size standard calculations for certain small business concerns.
Sec. 873. Modifications to small business subcontracting.
Sec. 874. Inclusion of best in class designations in annual report on small business goals.
Sec. 875. Small Business Administration cybersecurity reports.
Sec. 876. Cyber counseling certification program for lead small business development centers.
Sec. 877. Exemption of certain contracts from the periodic inflation adjustments to the acquisition-related dollar threshold.
Sec. 878. Improvements to certain defense innovation programs.
Sec. 879. Pilot program for development of technology-enhanced capabilities with partnership intermediaries.
Sec. 880. Authorized official to carry out the procurement technical assistance cooperative agreement program.
Sec. 881. Permanent authorization and improvement of Department of Defense Mentor-Protege Program.
Sec. 891. Requirement to use models of commercial e-commerce portal program.
Sec. 892. Report and database on items manufactured in the United States for major defense acquisition programs.
Sec. 893. Requirements relating to Selected Acquisition Reports.
Sec. 894. Contractor science, technology, engineering, and math programs.
Sec. 895. Extension of sunset relating to Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative.
Sec. 896. Requirements relating to certain rail rolling stock procurements and operations.
Sec. 897. Prohibition on contracting with persons that have business operations with the Maduro regime.
Sec. 901. Update of authorities relating to nuclear command, control, and communications.
Sec. 911. Codification of Assistant Secretaries for Environment, Installations, and Energy of the Army, Navy, and Air Force.
Sec. 912. Limitation on availability of funds for consolidation of Defense Media Activity.
Sec. 913. Modernization of certain forms and surveys.
Sec. 921. Establishment of United States Space Corps in the Department of the Air Force.
Sec. 922. Transfer of personnel, functions, and assets to the Space Corps.
Sec. 923. Reports on Space Corps.
Sec. 924. Space National Guard.
Sec. 925. Effects on military installations.
Sec. 931. United States Space Command.
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. Additional requirements for annual report and briefing on financial improvement and audit remediation plan.
Sec. 1003. Financial improvement and audit remediation plan.
Sec. 1004. Reporting requirements relating to Department of Defense audits.
Sec. 1005. Annual budget justification display for service-common and other support and enabling capabilities for special operations forces.
Sec. 1006. Determination of budgetary effects.
Sec. 1007. Independent public accountant audit of financial systems of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1011. Modification of authority to provide support to other agencies for counterdrug activities and activities to counter transnational organized crime.
Sec. 1012. Technical correction and extension of reporting requirement regarding enhancement of information sharing and coordination of military training between Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense.
Sec. 1013. Repeal of Secretary of Defense review of curricula and program structures of National Guard Counterdrug Schools.
Sec. 1021. Transportation by sea of supplies for the Armed Forces and Defense Agencies.
Sec. 1022. Use of National Defense Sealift Fund for procurement of two used vessels.
Sec. 1023. Formal schoolhouse training for shipboard system programs of record.
Sec. 1024. Report on shipbuilder training and the defense industrial base.
Sec. 1031. Extension of authority for joint task forces to provide support to law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities.
Sec. 1032. Prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to certain countries.
Sec. 1033. Prohibition on use of funds for transfer to and detention of additional individuals, including United States citizens, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1034. Sense of Congress regarding the provision of medical care to individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1035. Independent assessment on gender and countering violent extremism.
Sec. 1041. Scheduling of Department of Defense executive aircraft controlled by Secretaries of military departments.
Sec. 1042. Explosive ordnance defense disposal program.
Sec. 1043. Notification on the provision of defense sensitive support.
Sec. 1044. Modification and technical correction of authority for deployment of members of the Armed Forces to the southern land border of the United States.
Sec. 1045. Limitation on use of funds for the inactivation of Army watercraft units.
Sec. 1046. Prohibition on use of funds for construction of a wall, fence, or other physical barrier along the southern border of the United States.
Sec. 1047. Expenditure of funds for Department of Defense intelligence and counterintelligence activities.
Sec. 1048. Limitation on use of funds to house children separated from parents.
Sec. 1049. Limitation on use of funds for providing housing for unaccompanied alien children.
Sec. 1051. Short title.
Sec. 1052. Report on operational concepts and plans regarding strategic competitors.
Sec. 1053. Actions to increase analytic support.
Sec. 1054. Definitions.
Sec. 1061. Report on transfers of equipment to prohibited entities.
Sec. 1062. Elimination of requirement to submit reports to Congress in paper format.
Sec. 1063. Modification of annual report on civilian casualties in connection with United States military operations.
Sec. 1064. Inclusion of certain individuals investigated by Inspectors General in the semiannual report.
Sec. 1065. Annual report on Joint Military Information Support Operations Web Operations Center.
Sec. 1066. Mobility capability requirements study.
Sec. 1067. Assessment of special operations force structure.
Sec. 1068. Army aviation strategic plan and modernization roadmap.
Sec. 1069. Report on ground-based long-range artillery to counter land and maritime threats.
Sec. 1070. Independent review of transportation working-capital fund.
Sec. 1071. Geographic command risk assessment of proposed use of certain aircraft capabilities.
Sec. 1072. Annual report on strikes undertaken by the United States against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities.
Sec. 1073. Termination of requirement for submittal to Congress of certain recurring reports.
Sec. 1074. Report on operational concepts and plans regarding strategic competitors.
Sec. 1081. Technical, conforming, and clerical amendments.
Sec. 1082. Submission to Congress of Department of Defense execute orders.
Sec. 1083. Extension of National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence.
Sec. 1084. National Commission on Military Aviation Safety.
Sec. 1085. Extension of postage stamp for breast cancer research.
Sec. 1086. Processes and procedures for notifications regarding special operations forces.
Sec. 1087. Assessment of standards, processes, procedures, and policy relating to civilian casualties.
Sec. 1088. Disposal of IPv4 addresses.
Sec. 1089. Securing American science and technology.
Sec. 1090. Standardized policy guidance for calculating aircraft operation and sustainment costs.
Sec. 1091. Special Federal Aviation Regulation Working Group.
Sec. 1101. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency personnel management authority.
Sec. 1102. Modification of probationary period for certain Department of Defense employees.
Sec. 1103. Civilian personnel management.
Sec. 1104. One-year extension of temporary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone.
Sec. 1105. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for federal civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1106. Performance of civilian functions by military personnel.
Sec. 1107. Extension of direct hire authority for domestic industrial base facilities and Major Range and Test Facilities Base.
Sec. 1108. Authority to provide additional allowances and benefits for certain Defense Clandestine Service employees.
Sec. 1109. Prohibited personnel practices.
Sec. 1110. Enhancement of antidiscrimination protections for Federal employees.
Sec. 1111. Modification of direct hire authorities for the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1112. Permitted disclosures by whistleblowers.
Sec. 1201. Modification of authority to build capacity of foreign security forces.
Sec. 1202. Modification and extension of cross servicing agreements for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment in coalition operations.
Sec. 1203. Modification of quarterly report on obligation and expenditure of funds for security cooperation programs and activities.
Sec. 1204. Integration of gender perspectives and meaningful participation by women in security cooperation authorities.
Sec. 1211. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.
Sec. 1212. Modification and Extension of Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program.
Sec. 1213. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Afghanistan.
Sec. 1214. Extension and modification of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan.
Sec. 1215. Authority for certain payments to redress injury and loss in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Libya, and Yemen.
Sec. 1216. Extension of semiannual report on enhancing security and stability in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1221. Modification of authority to provide assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
Sec. 1222. Extension and modification of authority to provide assistance to the vetted Syrian opposition.
Sec. 1223. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Sec. 1224. Prohibition on provision of weapons and other forms of support to certain organizations.
Sec. 1225. Rule of construction relating to use of military force against Iran.
Sec. 1226. Sense of Congress on support for Ministry of Peshmerga forces of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.
Sec. 1231. Prohibition on the use of funds to suspend, terminate, or withdraw the United States from the Open Skies Treaty.
Sec. 1232. Extension of limitation on military cooperation between the United States and Russia.
Sec. 1233. Prohibition on availability of funds relating to sovereignty of Russia over Crimea.
Sec. 1234. Modification and extension of Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative.
Sec. 1235. Report on treaties relating to nuclear arms control.
Sec. 1236. Sense of Congress on updating and modernizing existing agreements to avert miscalculation between the United States and Russia.
Sec. 1237. Sense of Congress on support for Georgia.
Sec. 1238. Sense of Congress on support for Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.
Sec. 1241. Modification of Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Initiative.
Sec. 1242. Extension and modification of report on military and security developments involving North Korea.
Sec. 1243. Limitation on use of funds to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are deployed to South Korea.
Sec. 1244. Report on direct, indirect, and burden-sharing contributions of Japan and South Korea.
Sec. 1245. Report on strategy on the Philippines.
Sec. 1246. Modification of annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China.
Sec. 1247. Modification of annual report on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China.
Sec. 1248. Sense of Congress on Taiwan.
Sec. 1249. Enhancing defense cooperation with Singapore.
Sec. 1251. Extension and modification of NATO Special Operations Headquarters.
Sec. 1252. Modification and extension of future years plan and planning transparency for the European Deterrence Initiative.
Sec. 1253. Protection of European Deterrence Initiative funds from diversion for other purposes.
Sec. 1254. Statement of policy on United States military investment in Europe.
Sec. 1255. Limitation on transfer of F–35 aircraft to Turkey.
Sec. 1256. Report on value of investments in dual use infrastructure projects by NATO member states.
Sec. 1257. Sense of Congress on support for Poland.
Sec. 1261. Sense of Congress on United States partners and allies.
Sec. 1262. Modification to report on legal and policy frameworks for the use of military force.
Sec. 1263. Limitation on availability of certain funds until report submitted on Department of Defense awards and disciplinary action as a result of the 2017 incident in Niger.
Sec. 1264. Independent assessment of sufficiency of resources available to United States Southern Command and United States Africa Command.
Sec. 1265. Rule of construction relating to use of military force.
Sec. 1266. Rule of construction relating to use of military force against Venezuela.
Sec. 1267. Sense of Congress on acquisition by Turkey of Patriot system.
Sec. 1271. Findings.
Sec. 1272. Sense of Congress.
Sec. 1273. Defense assessment.
Sec. 1274. Appropriate congressional committees defined.
Sec. 1301. Funding allocations.
Sec. 1302. Specification of cooperative threat reduction funds.
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. Chemical agents and munitions destruction, defense.
Sec. 1403. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide.
Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1405. Defense health program.
Sec. 1406. National defense sealift fund.
Sec. 1411. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility demonstration fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1412. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home.
Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Procurement.
Sec. 1503. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 1504. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 1505. Military personnel.
Sec. 1506. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1507. Drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, defense-wide.
Sec. 1508. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1509. Defense Health Program.
Sec. 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1512. Special transfer authority.
Sec. 1521. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1601. National Security Space Launch program.
Sec. 1602. Preparation to implement plan for use of allied launch vehicles.
Sec. 1603. Annual determination on plan on full integration and exploitation of overhead persistent infrared capability.
Sec. 1604. Space-based environmental monitoring mission requirements.
Sec. 1605. Prototype program for multi-global navigation satellite system receiver development.
Sec. 1606. Commercial space situational awareness capabilities.
Sec. 1607. Independent study on plan for deterrence in space.
Sec. 1608. Resilient enterprise ground architecture.
Sec. 1611. Modifications to ISR Integration Council and annual briefing requirements.
Sec. 1612. Survey and report on alignment of intelligence collections capabilities and activities with Department of Defense requirements.
Sec. 1613. Modification of annual authorization of appropriations for National Flagship Language Initiative.
Sec. 1621. Notification requirements for sensitive military cyber operations.
Sec. 1622. Quarterly cyber operations briefings.
Sec. 1623. Cyber posture review.
Sec. 1624. Tier 1 exercise of support to civil authorities for a cyber incident.
Sec. 1625. Evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1626. Extension of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission.
Sec. 1627. Authority to use operation and maintenance funds for cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects.
Sec. 1628. Notification of delegation of authorities to the Secretary of Defense for military operations in cyberspace.
Sec. 1629. Limitation of funding for Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services.
Sec. 1630. Annual military cyberspace operations report.
Sec. 1631. Report on synchronization of efforts relating to cybersecurity in the Defense Industrial Base.
Sec. 1632. Briefings on the status of the National Security Agency and United States Cyber Command partnership.
Sec. 1641. Improvement to annual report on the modernization of the nuclear weapons enterprise.
Sec. 1642. Briefings on meetings held by the Nuclear Weapons Council.
Sec. 1643. Elimination of conventional requirement for long-range standoff weapon.
Sec. 1644. Extension of annual briefing on the costs of forward-deploying nuclear weapons in Europe.
Sec. 1645. Ten-year extension of prohibition on availability of funds for mobile variant of ground-based strategic deterrent missile.
Sec. 1646. Prohibition on availability of funds for deployment of low-yield ballistic missile warhead.
Sec. 1647. Report on military-to-military dialogue to reduce the risk of miscalculation leading to nuclear war.
Sec. 1648. Plan on nuclear command, control, and communications systems.
Sec. 1649. Independent study on policy of no-first-use of nuclear weapons.
Sec. 1650. Independent study on risks of nuclear terrorism and nuclear war.
Sec. 1661. National missile defense policy.
Sec. 1662. Development of hypersonic and ballistic missile tracking space sensor payload.
Sec. 1663. Requirement for testing of redesigned kill vehicle prior to production.
Sec. 1664. Development of space-based ballistic missile intercept layer.
Sec. 1665. Organization, authorities, and billets of the Missile Defense Agency.
Sec. 1666. Missile defense interceptor site in contiguous United States.
Sec. 1667. Missile defense radar in Hawaii.
Sec. 1668. Limitation on availability of funds for lower tier air and missile sensor.
Sec. 1669. Command and control, battle management, and communications program.
Sec. 1670. Annual assessment of ballistic missile defense system.
Sec. 1681. Modification to reports on certain solid rocket motors.
Sec. 1682. Repeal of review requirement for ammonium perchlorate report.
Sec. 1683. Repeal of requirement for commission on electromagnetic pulse attacks and similar events.
Sec. 1684. Conventional prompt global strike weapon system.
Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.
Sec. 2003. Effective date.
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects.
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2017 project.
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Modification of authorities to carry out phased Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex consolidation.
Sec. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2016 project.
Sec. 2307. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2017 project.
Sec. 2308. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2018 projects.
Sec. 2309. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2019 projects.
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy resiliency and energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
Sec. 2511. Republic of Korea funded construction projects.
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense base closure account.
Sec. 2801. Prohibition on use of military construction funds for construction of a wall, fence, or other physical barrier along the southern border of the United States.
Sec. 2802. Modification and clarification of construction authority in the event of a declaration of war or national emergency.
Sec. 2803. Inclusion of information regarding military installation resilience in master plans for major military installations.
Sec. 2804. Improved consultation with tribal governments when proposed military construction projects potentially impact Indian tribes.
Sec. 2805. Amendment of Unified Facilities Criteria to promote military installation resilience, energy resilience, energy and climate resiliency, and cyber resilience.
Sec. 2806. Modification to Department of Defense Form 1391 regarding consideration of potential long-term adverse environmental effects.
Sec. 2811. Enhanced protections for members of the Armed Forces and their dependents residing in privatized military housing units.
Sec. 2812. Prohibition on use of nondisclosure agreements in connection with leases of military housing constructed or acquired using alternative authority for acquisition and improvement of military housing.
Sec. 2813. Authority to furnish certain services in connection with use of alternative authority for acquisition and improvement of military housing.
Sec. 2814. Modification to requirements for window fall prevention devices in military family housing units.
Sec. 2815. Assessment of hazards in Department of Defense housing.
Sec. 2816. Development of process to identify and address environmental health hazards in Department of Defense housing.
Sec. 2817. Report on civilian personnel shortages for appropriate oversight of management of military housing constructed or acquired using alternative authority for acquisition and improvement of military housing.
Sec. 2818. Inspector General review of Department of Defense oversight of privatized military housing.
Sec. 2819. Department of Defense inspection authority regarding privatized military housing.
Sec. 2820. Improvement of privatized military housing.
Sec. 2831. Improved energy security for main operating bases in Europe.
Sec. 2832. Access to Department of Defense facilities for credentialed transportation workers.
Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Hill Air Force Base, Utah.
Sec. 2842. Release of conditions and reversionary interest, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas.
Sec. 2843. Modification of authorized uses of certain property conveyed by the United States in Los Angeles, California.
Sec. 2851. Public notice regarding upcoming periods of Secretary of the Navy management of Shared Use Area of the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.
Sec. 2861. Short title.
Sec. 2862. Definitions.
Sec. 2863. Findings.
Sec. 2864. Establishment of White Sands National Park in the State of New Mexico.
Sec. 2865. Transfers of administrative jurisdiction related to the National Park and White Sands Missile Range.
Sec. 2866. Boundary modifications related to the National Park and Missile Range.
Sec. 2871. Installation and maintenance of fire extinguishers in Department of Defense facilities.
Sec. 2872. Definition of community infrastructure for purposes of military base reuse studies and community planning assistance.
Sec. 2873. Report on vulnerabilities from sea level rise to certain military installations located outside the continental United States.
Sec. 2874. Black start exercises at Joint Bases.
Sec. 2901. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2902. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2903. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2904. Authorized defense agencies construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2905. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 3001. Authorization of emergency Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 3002. Authorization of emergency Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 3003. Authorization of emergency Army National Guard and Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Sec. 3104. Nuclear energy.
Sec. 3111. Personnel levels of the Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security.
Sec. 3112. Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation.
Sec. 3113. Clarification of certain Stockpile Responsiveness Program objectives.
Sec. 3114. Modification to plutonium pit production capacity.
Sec. 3115. Annual certification of shipments to Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
Sec. 3116. Repeal of limitation on availability of funds for acceleration of nuclear weapons dismantlement.
Sec. 3117. Elimination of limitation on availability of funds relating to submission of annual reports on unfunded priorities.
Sec. 3118. Program for research and development of advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium.
Sec. 3119. Replacement of W78 warhead.
Sec. 3120. National Laboratory Jobs Access Program.
Sec. 3201. Authorization.
Sec. 3202. Improvements to Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
Sec. 3401. Authorization of appropriations.
Sec. 3501. Authorization of the Maritime Administration.
Sec. 3502. Reauthorization of Maritime Security Program.
Sec. 3503. Maritime Occupational Safety and Health Advisory Committee.
Sec. 3511. Tanker Security Fleet.
Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.
Sec. 4101. Procurement.
Sec. 4102. Procurement for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
Sec. 4202. Research, development, test, and evaluation for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.
Sec. 4302. Operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4401. Military personnel.
Sec. 4402. Military personnel for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.
Sec. 4502. Other authorizations for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4601. Military construction.
Sec. 4602. Military construction for overseas contingency operations.
Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs.
In this Act, the term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
Section 126(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2035) is amended—
(2) in paragraph (1), by striking “costs described in subsection (b) for the CVN–79 and CVN–80” and inserting “cost targets for the CVN–79, the CVN–80, and the CVN–81”; and
(3) in paragraph (2)—
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “ and the CVN–80” and inserting “, the CVN–80, and the CVN–81”
(B) in subparagraph (A), by striking “costs described in subsection (b)” and inserting “cost targets”;
Section 122 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2104), as most recently amended by section 121(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1309), is repealed.
Before accepting delivery of the Ford class aircraft carrier designated CVN–79, the Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the aircraft carrier is capable of operating and deploying with the F–35C aircraft.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to reduce the number of operational aircraft carriers of the Navy below the number specified in section 8062(b) of title 10, United States Code.
(a) In general.—Using funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract, beginning with the fiscal year 2020 program year, for the design and construction of the amphibious transport dock designated LPD–31.
(b) Use of incremental funding.—With respect to the contract entered into under subsection (a), the Secretary may use incremental funding to make payments under the contract.
(c) Condition for out-year contract payments.—The contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2020 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for aircraft procurement, Navy, for the CH–53K King Stallion helicopter program, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Navy provides the first briefing required under subsection (b).
(b) Quarterly briefings required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning not later than October 1, 2019, and on a quarterly basis thereafter through October 1, 2022, the Secretary of the Navy shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on the progress of the CH–53K King Stallion helicopter program.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each briefing under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to the CH–53K King Stallion helicopter program, the following:
(B) A statement of the total cost of the program as of the date of the briefing, including the costs of development, testing, and production.
(C) A comparison of the total cost of the program relative to the approved acquisition program baseline.
(D) An assessment of flight testing under the program, including identification of the number of test events have been conducted on-time in accordance with the joint integrated program schedule.
(E) An update on the correction of technical deficiencies under the program, including—
(i) identification of the technical deficiencies that have been corrected as of the date of the briefing;
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for procurement for the VH–92A helicopter, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Navy submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives the report required under subsection (b).
(b) Report required.—The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report assessing the status of the VH–92A helicopter program industrial base and the potential impact of proposed manufacturing base changes on the acquisition program. The report shall include a description of—
(1) estimated effects on the manufacturing readiness level of the VH–92 program due to planned changes to the program manufacturing base;
(2) the estimated costs and assessment of cost risk to the program due to planned changes to the program manufacturing base;
(a) In general.—Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of the Navy, acting through the executive agent described in subsection (e), shall seek to enter into a contract for the construction of one sealift vessel for the National Defense Reserve Fleet.
(b) Delivery date.—The contract entered into under subsection (a) shall specify a delivery date for the sealift vessel of not later than September 30, 2026.
(c) Design and construction requirements.—
(1) USE OF EXISTING DESIGN.—The design of the sealift vessel shall be based on a domestic or foreign design that exists as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) Certificate and endorsement.—The sealift vessel shall meet the requirements necessary to receive a certificate of documentation and a coastwise endorsement under chapter 121 of tile 46, United States Code, and the Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the completed vessel receives such a certificate and endorsement.
(e) Executive agent.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy shall seek to enter into a contract or other agreement with a private-sector entity under which the entity shall act as executive agent for the Secretary for purposes of the contract under subsection (a).
Section 141(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1661) is amended—
Section 146(a)(1) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) is amended by striking “the military type certification” and inserting “either the military type certification or a military flight release”.
(a) Designation of major subprogram.—In accordance with section 2430a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall designate the F–15EX program as a major subprogram of the F–15 aircraft program.
(b) Limitation.—Except as provided in subsection (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to procure an F–15EX aircraft until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees the following documentation relating to the F–15EX program:
(c) Exception for production of prototypes.—
(d) F–15EX program defined.—In this section, the term “F–15EX program” means the F–15EX aircraft program of the Air Force as described in the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2020 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code).
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to reduce the number of KC–10 aircraft in the primary mission aircraft inventory of the Air Force.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 or any subsequent fiscal year for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to carry out over-and-above work on the VC–25B aircraft until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(1) with respect to work relating to aircraft paint scheme, interiors and livery, such work will not result in changes to the VC–25B aircraft that cause the aircraft to exceed—
(2) the livery for the VC–25B aircraft will comply with the criteria set forth in the report of the Boeing Company titled “Phase II Aircraft Livery and Paint Study Final Report” as submitted to the Federal Government in April 2017;
(a) Limitation.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, or prepare to retire, any RC–135 aircraft until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(a) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the aircraft fleet of the Civil Air Patrol.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of each of the following:
(1) Whether the number of aircraft, types of aircraft, and operating locations that comprise the Civil Air Patrol fleet are suitable for the missions and responsibilities assigned to the Civil Air Patrol, including—
(2) The ideal overall size of the Civil Air Patrol aircraft fleet, including a description of the factors used to determine that ideal size.
(a) Economic order quantity contract authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraphs (2) through (5), from amounts made available for obligation under the F–35 aircraft program for fiscal year 2020, the Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2020 program year, for the procurement of economic order quantities of material and equipment that has completed formal hardware qualification testing for the F–35 aircraft program for use in procurement contracts to be awarded for such program during fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023.
(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount obligated under all contracts entered into under paragraph (1) shall not exceed $574,000,000.
(3) PRELIMINARY FINDINGS.—Before entering into a contract under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall make each of the following findings with respect to such contract:
(A) The use of such a contract will result in significant savings of the total anticipated costs of carrying out the program through annual contracts.
(B) The minimum need for the property to be procured is expected to remain substantially unchanged during the contemplated contract period in terms of production rate, procurement rate, and total quantities.
(C) There is a reasonable expectation that, throughout the contemplated contract period, the Secretary will request funding for the contract at the level required to avoid contract cancellation.
(D) That there is a stable, certified, and qualified design for the property to be procured and that the technical risks and redesign risks associated with such property are low.
(4) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—Except as provided in paragraph (5), the Secretary of Defense may not enter into a contract under paragraph (1) until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees, in writing, that each of the following conditions is satisfied:
(A) A sufficient number of end items of the system being acquired under such contract have been delivered at or within the most recently available estimates of the program acquisition unit cost or procurement unit cost for such system to determine that the estimates of the unit costs are realistic.
(B) During the fiscal year in which such contract is to be awarded, sufficient funds will be available to perform the contract in such fiscal year, and the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, for that fiscal year will include the funding required to execute the program without cancellation.
(D) The proposed contract provides for production at not less than minimum economic rates given the existing tooling and facilities.
(5) EXCEPTION.—Notwithstanding paragraph (4), the Secretary of Defense may enter into a contract under paragraph (1) on or after March 1, 2020, if—
(A) the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation has not completed a cost analysis of the preliminary findings made by the Secretary under paragraph (3) with respect to the contract;
(b) Buy-to-budget acquisition.—Subject to section 2308 of title 10, United States Code, using funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the procurement of F–35 aircraft, the Secretary of Defense may procure a quantity of F–35 aircraft in excess of the quantity authorized by this Act if such additional procurement does not require additional funds to be authorized to be appropriated because of production efficiencies or other cost reductions.
(a) Designation of major subprogram.—In accordance with section 2430a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall designate F–35 Block 4 as a major subprogram of the F–35 aircraft program.
(b) Cost estimates.—
(1) JOINT COST ESTIMATE.—The Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy shall jointly develop a joint service cost estimate for the life-cycle costs of the F–35 aircraft program.
(c) Revision of program elements.—
(1) REVISION REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall revise the program elements applicable to the F–35 aircraft program as follows:
(A) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.—The program element for research and development costs (as that element was specified in the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2020 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code)) shall be separated into the following individual program elements:
(B) PROCUREMENT.—The program element for procurement costs (as that element was specified in the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2020 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code)) shall be separated into the following individual program elements:
(2) INCLUSION IN BUDGET MATERIALS.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each revised program element described in paragraph (1) is included, with a specific dollar amount, in the materials relating to the F–35 aircraft program submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense in support of the budget of the President (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) for fiscal year 2021 and each fiscal year thereafter until the date on which the F–35 aircraft program terminates.
(d) Comptroller General reports.—
(1) ANNUAL REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the F–35 aircraft program.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to the F–35 aircraft program, the following:
(B) The business case analysis of the Department of Defense for F–35 Block 4 follow-on modernization efforts.
(C) The progress and results of F–35 Block 4 and other follow-on modernization development and testing efforts.
(a) Report on F–35 reliability and maintainability metrics.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the reliability and maintainability metrics for the F–35 aircraft. The report shall include the following:
(1) The results of a review and assessment, conducted by the program office for the F–35 aircraft program, of the reliability and maintainability metrics for the aircraft as set forth in the most recent operational requirements document for the program.
(2) A determination of whether the reliability and maintainability metrics for the aircraft, as set forth in the most recent operational requirements document for the program, are feasible and attainable, and what changes, if any, will be made to update the metrics.
(b) Report on F–35 Block 4.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on F–35 Block 4. The report shall include the following:
(A) The results of an independent cost estimate for F–35 Block 4 conducted by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
(B) A test and evaluation master plan, approved by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, that addresses testing resources, testing aircraft shortfalls, and testing funding.
(c) Report on F–35 Autonomic Logistics Information System.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the autonomic logistics information system of the F–35 aircraft. The report shall include a description of each of the following:
(a) Program required.—Chapter 111 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2192a the following new section:
Ҥ 2192b. Program on enhancement of preparation of dependents of members of armed forces for careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
“(a) Program required.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program to—
“(c) Activities.—Activities under the program may include the following:
“(1) Establishment of targeted internships and cooperative research opportunities at defense laboratories and other technical centers for students and teachers at covered schools.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2192a the following new item:
“2192b. Program on enhancement of preparation of dependents of members of armed forces for careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.”.
(c) Conforming repeal.—Section 233 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 10 U.S.C. 2193a note) is repealed.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 1599h of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(6) JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTER.—The Director of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center may carry out a program of personnel management authority provided in subsection (b) in order to facilitate recruitment of eminent experts in science or engineering for the Center. The authority to carry out the program under this paragraph shall terminate on December 31, 2024.”.
Section 218 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking “the program required under subsection (b), and shall” and inserting “the program and activities described in subsections (d) through (g), and shall”;
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections:
“(b) Director.—There is a Director of the Office (referred to in this section as the ‘Director’). The Director shall be appointed by the Secretary of Defense and shall serve as the senior official in the Department of Defense with principal responsibility for carrying out the program and activities described in subsections (d) through (g). The Director shall report to the Assistant Director for Hypersonics within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering.
“(c) University consortium.—
“(1) DESIGNATION.—The Director shall designate a consortium of institutions of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) to lead foundational hypersonic research in research areas that the Director determines to be appropriate for the Department of Defense.
(5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated—
(6) in subsection (f), as so redesignated—
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(7) in subsection (g), as so redesignated—
(8) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(h) Funding.—The Secretary may make available such funds to the Office for basic research, applied research, advanced technology development, prototyping, studies and analyses, and organizational support as the Secretary considers appropriate to support the efficient and effective development of hypersonics technologies and transition of those systems and technologies into acquisition programs or operational use.”.
(a) Extension of program.—Section 1603(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 2359 note) is amended by striking “2019” and inserting “2024”.
(b) Additional improvements.—Section 1603 of such Act, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended—
(3) in subsection (c)(4)(A)(iv), by inserting “, which may include access to venture capital” after “award”;
(7) by adding at the end the following new subsection (e):
“(e) Authorities.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary may use the following authorities:
“(1) Section 1599g of title 10 of the United States Code, relating to public-private talent exchanges.
“(2) Section 2368 of such title, relating to Centers for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnerships.
“(6) Section 225 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2359 note).
“(7) Section 1711 of such Act (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2505 note), relating to a pilot program on strengthening manufacturing in the defense industrial base.
“(8) Section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a) and section 6305 of title 31, United States Code, relating to cooperative research and development agreements.”.
(a) Contract authority.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center under which the private scientific advisory group known as “JASON” will provide national security research studies to the Department of Defense.
(b) Terms of contract.—The contract entered into under subsection (a) shall be an indefinite delivery-indefinite quantity contract with terms substantially similar to the terms of the contract in effect before March 28, 2019, under which JASON provided national security research studies to the Department of Defense (solicitation number HQ0034-19-R-0011 for JASON National Security Research Studies).
Pursuant to section 173 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to engage the members of the private scientific advisory group known as “JASON” as advisory personnel to provide advice, on an ongoing basis, on matters involving science, technology, and national security, including methods to defeat existential and technologically-amplified threats to national security.
(a) Program authorized.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Energy, and the heads of such other Federal agencies as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, may carry out a program on research, development, testing, evaluation, study, and demonstration of technologies related to blue carbon capture and direct air capture.
(2) PROGRAM GOALS.—The goals of the program established under paragraph (1) are as follows:
(A) To develop technologies that capture carbon dioxide from seawater and the air to turn such carbon dioxide into clean fuels to enhance fuel and energy security.
(b) Research and development phase.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—During the research and development phase of the Program, the Secretary of Defense may conduct research and development in pursuit of the goals set forth in subsection (a)(2).
(2) DIRECT AIR CAPTURE.—The research and development phase of the Program may include, with respect to direct air capture, a front end engineering and design study that includes an evaluation of direct air capture designs to produce fuel for use—
(3) DURATION.—The Secretary may carry out the research and development phase of the Program commencing not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Testing and evaluation phase.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—During the testing and evaluation phase of the Program, the Secretary may, in pursuit of the goals set forth in subsection (a)(2), conduct tests and evaluations of the technologies researched and developed during the research and development phase of the Program.
(2) DIRECT AIR CAPTURE.—The testing and evaluation phase of the Program may include demonstration projects for direct air capture to produce fuel for use—
(3) DURATION.—Subject to subsection (a)(3)(B), the Secretary may carry out the testing and evaluation phase of the Program commencing on the date of the completion of the research and development phase described in subsection (b), except that the testing and evaluation phase of the Program with respect to direct air capture may commence at such time after a front end engineering and design study demonstrates to the Secretary that commencement of such phase is appropriate.
(4) GRANTS AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary may carry out the testing and evaluation phase of the Program through the award of grants to private persons and eligible laboratories.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) BLUE CARBON CAPTURE.—The term “blue carbon capture” means the removal of dissolved carbon dioxide from seawater through engineered or inorganic processes, including filters, membranes, or phase change systems.
(2) DIRECT AIR CAPTURE.—
(3) ELIGIBLE LABORATORY.—The term “eligible laboratory” means—
(A) a National Laboratory (as defined in section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15801)); or
(B) the science and technology reinvention laboratories (as designated under section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84 ; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note));
(a) Program required.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall carry out a research program on foreign malign influence operations research as part of the university and other basic research programs of the Department of Defense (such as the Minerva Research Initiative).
(b) Program objectives.—The objectives of the research program shall be the following:
(1) To enhance the understanding of foreign malign influence operations, including activities conducted on social media platforms.
(2) To facilitate the compilation, analysis, and storage of publicly available or voluntarily provided indicators of foreign malign influence operations, including those appearing on social media platforms, for the purposes of additional research.
(3) To promote the development of best practices relating to tactics, techniques, procedures, and technology for the protection of the privacy of the customers and users of the social media platforms and the proprietary information of the social media companies in conducting research and analysis or compiling and storing indicators and key trends of foreign malign influence operations on social media platforms.
(c) Program activities.—In order to achieve the objectives specified in subsection (b), the Secretary is authorized to carry out the following activities:
(d) Report.—Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the Secretary in carrying out the research program under this section, including a description of the activities and research conducted as part of the program.
(a) F–35 sensor data.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that—
(1) information collected by the passive and active on-board sensors of the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft is capable of being shared, in real time, with joint service users in cases in which the Joint Force Commander determines that sharing such information would be operationally advantageous; and
(b) GAO study and report.—
(1) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study of the sensor data collection and dissemination capability of fifth generation aircraft of the Department of Defense.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The study required by paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of the following—
(A) the extent to which the Department has established doctrinal, organizational, or technological methods of managing the large amount of sensor data that is currently collected and which may be collected by existing and planned advanced fifth generation aircraft;
(3) STUDY RESULTS.—
(A) INTERIM BRIEFING.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the preliminary findings of the study conducted under this subsection.
(B) FINAL RESULTS.—The Comptroller General shall provide the final results of the study conducted under this subsection to the congressional defense committees at such time and in such format as is mutually agreed upon by the committees and the Comptroller General at the time of the briefing under subparagraph (A).
(a) Documentation required.—Not later than the date specified in subsection (b), the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees the following documentation relating to the Advanced Battle Management System:
(a) Documentation required.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees the following documentation relating to the B–52 commercial engine replacement program of the Air Force:
(b) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Air Force, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees the documentation required under subsection (a).
(a) Assessment required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall conduct an assessment of critical skillsets required across the science, technology, research, and engineering workforce of the Department of Defense to support emerging and future warfighter technologies.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall include analysis of the following:
(A) The percentage of women and minorities employed in the workforce as of the date of the assessment.
(C) The effectiveness of existing hiring and attraction incentives, other encouragements, and required service agreement commitments in attracting and retaining minorities and women in the workforce of the Department after such individuals complete work on Department-funded research projects, grant projects, fellowships, and STEM programs.
(b) Plan required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Based on the results of the assessment conducted under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall develop and implement a plan to diversify and strengthen the science, technology, research, and engineering workforce of the Department of Defense.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall—
(A) align with science and technology strategy priorities of the Department of Defense, including the emerging and future warfighter technology requirements identified by the Department;
(B) except as provided in subsection (c)(2), set forth steps for the implementation of each recommendation included in the 2013 report of the RAND corporation titled “First Steps Toward Improving DoD STEM Workforce Diversity”;
(C) harness the full range of the Department’s STEM programs and other Department-sponsored programs to develop and attract top talent;
(E) establish and use contracts, agreements, or other arrangements with institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)), including historically black colleges and universities and other minority-serving institutions (as described in section 371(a) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1067q(a)) to enable easy and efficient access to research and researchers for Government-sponsored basic and applied research and studies at each institution, including contracts, agreements, and other authorized arrangements such as those authorized under—
(i) section 217 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note); and
(3) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(c) Deadline for implementation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act the Secretary of Defense shall carry out activities to implement the plan developed under subsection (b).
(2) EXCEPTION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS.—
(A) DELAYED IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of Defense may commence implementation of a recommendation described in subsection (b)(2)(B) after the date specified in paragraph (1) if the Secretary provides the congressional defense committees with a specific justification for the delay in implementation of such recommendation on or before such date.
(a) Policy.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall be a policy of the Department of Defense to promote and maintain digital expertise and software development as core competencies of civilian and military workforces of the Department, and as a capability to support the National Defense Strategy, which policy shall be achieved by—
(A) the recruitment, development, and incentivization of retention in and to the civilian and military workforce of the Department of individuals with aptitude, experience, proficient expertise, or a combination thereof in digital expertise and software development;
(B) at the discretion of the Secretaries of the military departments, the development and maintenance of civilian and military career tracks related to digital expertise, and related digital competencies for members of the Armed Forces, including the development and maintenance of training, education, talent management, incentives, and promotion policies in support of members at all levels of such career tracks; and
(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, “digital engineering” is the discipline and set of skills involved in the creation, processing, transmission, integration, and storage of digital data, (including but not limited to data science, machine learning, software engineering, software product management, and artificial intelligence product management).
(b) Responsibility.—
(1) APPOINTMENT OF OFFICER.—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall appoint a civilian official responsible for the development and implementation of the policy set forth in subsection (a). The official shall be known as the “Chief Digital Engineering Recruitment and Management Officer of the Department of Defense” (in this section referred to as the “Officer”).
(c) Duties.—In developing and providing for the discharge of the policy set forth in subsection (a), the Officer shall work with the Assistant Secretaries of the military departments for Manpower and Reserve Affairs to carry out the following:
(1) Develop for, and enhance within, the recruitment programs of each Armed Force various core initiatives, programs, activities, and mechanisms, tailored to the unique needs of each Armed Force, to identify and recruit civilian employees and members of the Armed Forces with demonstrated aptitude, interest, and proficiency in digital engineering, and in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) generally, including initiatives, programs, activities, and mechanisms to target populations of individuals not typically aware of opportunities in the Department of Defense for a digital engineering career.
(2) Identify and share with the military departments best practices around the development of flexible career tracks and identifiers for digital engineering and related digital competencies and meaningful opportunities for career development, talent management, and promotion within such career tracks.
(3) Develop and maintain education, training, doctrine, rotational opportunities, and professional development activities to support the civilian and military digital engineering workforce.
(4) Coordinate and synchronize digital force management activities throughout the Department of Defense, advise the Secretary of Defense on all matters pertaining to the health and readiness of digital forces, convene a Department-wide executive steering group, and submit to Congress an annual report on the readiness of digital forces and progress toward achieving the policy set forth in subsection (a).
(5) Create a Department-wide mechanism to track digital expertise in the workforce, develop and maintain organizational policies, strategies, and plans sufficient to build, maintain, and refresh internal capacity at scale, and report to the Secretary quarterly on the health and readiness the digital engineering workforce.
(6) Assist the military departments in designing, developing, and executing programs and incentives to retain, track, and oversee digital expertise among civilian employees of the Department and members of the Armed Forces on active duty.
(7) At the request of the Chief of Staff of an Armed Force, or the head of another component or element of the Department, undertake an executive search for key leadership positions in digital engineering in such Armed Force, component, or element, and develop and deploy agile hiring processes to fill such positions.
(d) Implementation plan.—Not later than May 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a plan to carry out the requirements of this section. The plan shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of progress of the Secretary in recruiting an individual to serve as the Officer required to be appointed under subsection (b).
(a) Capability required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall jointly design, develop, and implement a digital engineering capability and infrastructure—
(2) ELEMENTS.—The capability developed under subsection (a) shall consist of digital platforms that may be accessed by individuals throughout the Department who have responsibilities relating to the development, testing, evaluation, and operation of software. The platforms shall enable such individuals to—
(b) Pilot programs.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary and Director shall carry out pilot programs to demonstrate whether it is possible for automated testing to satisfy—
(2) NUMBER OF PILOT PROGRAMS.—The Under Secretary and Director shall carry out not fewer than four and not more than ten pilot programs under this section.
(3) REQUIREMENTS.—For each pilot program carried out under paragraph (1), the Under Secretary and Director shall—
(A) conduct a cost-benefit analysis that compares the costs and benefits of the digital engineering and automated testing approach of the pilot program to the nondigital engineering based approach typically used by the Department of Defense;
(4) CONSIDERATIONS.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Under Secretary and Director may consider using the authorities provided under sections 873 and 874 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91).
(5) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary and Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a description of—
(C) selection criteria and intellectual property and licensing issues relating to such software programs;
(c) Policies and guidance required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary and the Director shall issue policies and guidance to implement—
(2) ELEMENTS.—The policies and guidance issued under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) specify procedures for developing and maintaining digital engineering models and the automated testing of software throughout the program life cycle;
(B) include processes for automated testing of developmental test requirements and operational test requirements;
(D) include processes for security testing performed by individuals, including red team assessments with zero-trust assumptions;
(E) encourage the use of an automated testing capability instead of acquisition-related processes that require artifacts to be created for acquisition oversight but are not used as part of the engineering process;
(F) support the high-confidence distribution of software to the field on a time-bound, repeatable, frequent, and iterative basis;
(d) Consultation.—In carrying out subsections (a) through (c), the Under Secretary and Director shall consult with—
(e) Report required.—Not later one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary and Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the Under Secretary and Director in carrying out subsections (a) through (c). The report shall include—
(1) an independent assessment conducted by the Defense Innovation Board of the progress made as of the date of the report;
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “Under Secretary and Director” means the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, acting jointly.
(2) The term “digital engineering” means an integrated digital approach that uses authoritative sources of system data and models as a continuum across disciplines to support life-cycle activities from concept through disposal.
(a) Alignment of policy and technological development.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a process to ensure that the policies of the Department of Defense relating to emerging technology are formulated and updated continuously as such technology is developed by the Department.
(b) Elements.—As part of the process established under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1) specify the role of each covered official in ensuring that the formulation of policies relating to emerging technology is carried out concurrently with the development of such technology;
(2) establish mechanisms to ensure that the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy has the information and resources necessary to continuously formulate and update policies relating to emerging technology, including by directing the organizations and entities of the Department of Defense responsible for the development such technology—
(c) Reports required.—
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “covered official” means the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the commanders of the combatant commands, and the Secretaries of the military departments.
(2) The term “emerging technology” means technology determined to be in an emerging phase of development by the Secretary of Defense and includes quantum computing, technology for the analysis of large and diverse sets of data (commonly known as “big data analytics”), artificial intelligence, autonomous technology, robotics, directed energy, hypersonics, and biotechnology.
(a) Limitation.—The Secretary of Defense may not transition or transfer the functions of the Strategic Capabilities Office of the Department of Defense to another organization or element of the Department until—
(b) Plan required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the transition or transfer of the functions of the Strategic Capabilities Office to another organization or element of the Department of Defense.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A timeline for the potential transition or transfer of the activities, functions, programs, plans, and resources of the Strategic Capabilities Office.
(B) The status of funding and execution of current Strategic Capabilities Office projects, including a strategy for mitigating risk to current projects during the transition or transfer.
(C) The impact of the transition or transfer on the ability of the Department to rapidly address Combatant Command requirements.
(D) The impact of the transition or transfer on the cultural attributes and core competencies of the Strategic Capabilities Office and any organization or element of the Department of Defense affected by the realignment of the Office.
(E) An assessment of the impact of the transition or transfer on the relationships of the Strategic Capabilities Office with the military departments, Combatant Commands, Department of Defense laboratories, the intelligence community, and other research and development activities.
(a) Plan required.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall develop a master plan for using current authorities and responsibilities to strengthen and modernize the workforce and capabilities of the science and technology reinvention laboratories of the Department of Defense (referred to in this section as the “laboratories”) to enhance the ability of the laboratories to execute missions in the most efficient and effective manner.
(b) Elements.—The master plan required under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the laboratories, the following:
(1) A summary of hiring and staffing deficiencies at laboratories, by location, and the effect of such deficiencies on the ability of the laboratories—
(2) A summary of existing and emerging military research, development, test, and evaluation mission areas requiring the use of the laboratories.
(3) An explanation of the laboratory staffing capabilities required for each mission area identified under paragraph (2).
(4) Identification of specific projects, including hiring efforts and management reforms, that will be carried out—
(c) Consultation.—In developing the master plan required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall consult with—
(d) Initial report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that identifies any barriers that prevent the full use and implementation of current authorities and responsibilities and such other authorities as are determined to be relevant by the Secretary of Defense, including any barriers presented by the policies, authorities, and activities of—
(a) Plan required.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall develop and implement a master plan that addresses the research, development, test, and evaluation infrastructure and modernization requirements of the Department of Defense, including the science and technology reinvention laboratories and the facilities of the Major Range and Test Facility Base.
(b) Elements.—The master plan required under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the research, development, test, and evaluation infrastructure of the Department of Defense, the following:
(1) A summary of deficiencies in the infrastructure, by location, and the effect of the deficiencies on the ability of the Department—
(2) A summary of existing and emerging military research, development, test, and evaluation mission areas, by location, that require modernization investments in the infrastructure—
(3) Identification of specific infrastructure projects that are required to address the infrastructure deficiencies identified under paragraph (1) or to support the existing and emerging mission areas identified under paragraph (2).
(5) A description of how the Department, including each military department concerned, will carry out the infrastructure projects identified in paragraph (3) using the range of authorities and methods available to the Department, including—
(D) the authority to carry out facility repair projects, including the conversion of existing facilities, under section 2811 of such title;
(E) the authority provided under the Defense Laboratory Modernization Pilot Program under section 2803 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note);
(c) Consultation and use of contract authority.—In implementing the plan required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall—
(d) Submission to Congress.—Not later than October 30, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the master plan developed under subsection (a).
(e) Research and development infrastructure defined.—In this section, the term “research, development, test, and evaluation infrastructure” means the infrastructure of—
(1) the science and technology reinvention laboratories (as designated under section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84 ; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note));
(a) In general.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop—
(1) a strategy for harnessing fifth generation (commonly known as “5G”) information and communications technologies to enhance military capabilities, maintain a technological advantage on the battlefield, and accelerate the deployment of new commercial products and services enabled by 5G networks throughout the Department of Defense; and
(b) Elements.—The strategy required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1) Adoption and use of secure fourth generation (commonly known as “4G”) communications technologies and the transition to advanced and secure 5G communications technologies for military applications.
(2) Science, technology, research, and development efforts to facilitate the advancement and adoption of 5G technology and new uses of 5G systems, subsystems, and components, including—
(3) Strengthening engagement and outreach with industry, academia, international partners, and other departments and agencies of the Federal Government on issues relating to 5G technology.
(5) Preserving the ability of the Joint Force to achieve objectives in a contested and congested spectrum environment.
(6) Strengthening the ability of the Joint Force to conduct full spectrum operations that enhance the military advantages of the United States.
(a) Designation of senior official.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall designate a single official or existing entity within the Department of Defense as the official or entity (as the case may be) with principal responsibility for guiding the direction of research and development of next generation software and software intensive systems for the Department, including the research and development of—
(b) Development of strategy.—The official or entity designated under subsection (a) shall develop a Department-wide strategy for the research and development of next generation software and software intensive systems for the Department of Defense, including strategies for—
(1) types of software innovation efforts within the science and technology portfolio of the Department;
(2) investment in new approaches to software development, data-based analytics, and next generation management tools;
(3) ongoing research and other support of academic, commercial, and development community efforts to innovate the software development, engineering, and testing process;
(4) to the extent practicable, implementing the recommendations set forth in—
(A) the final report of the Defense Innovation Board submitted to the congressional defense committees under section 872 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1497); and
(B) the final report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Design and Acquisition of Software for Defense Systems described in section 868 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 10 U.S.C. 2223 note);
(5) supporting the acquisition, technology development, and test and operational needs of the Department through the development of capabilities, including personnel and infrastructure, and programs in—
(A) the science and technology reinvention laboratories (as designated under section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note));
(a) Strategy required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy for educating service members in relevant occupational fields on matters relating to artificial intelligence.
(b) Implementation plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for implementing the strategy developed under subsection (a).
(2) ELEMENTS.—The implementation plan required under paragraph (1) shall identify the following:
(A) The military occupational specialties (applicable to enlisted members and officers) that are most likely to involve interaction with artificial intelligence technology.
(B) The specific occupational specialties that will receive training in accordance with the curriculum described in subsection (a)(2).
(a) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and biannually thereafter through the end of 2023, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (referred to in this section as the “Center”).
(b) Elements.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(2) A description of the National Mission Initiatives, Component Mission Initiatives, and any other initiatives of the Center, including a description of—
(3) A description of how the Center has sought to leverage lessons learned, share best practices, avoid duplication of efforts, and transition artificial intelligence research efforts into operational capabilities by—
(5) The total number of military, contractor, and civilian personnel who are employed by the Center, assigned to the Center, and performing functions in support of the Center.
(c) Joint Artificial Intelligence Center defined.—In this section, the term “Joint Artificial Intelligence Center” means the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center of the Department of Defense established pursuant to section 238 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232).
(a) In general.—Beginning not later than October 1, 2019, and on a quarterly basis thereafter through October 1, 2025, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, in consultation with the Commander of the Army Futures Command, shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on the progress of the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program of the Army.
(b) Elements.—Each briefing under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle program, the following elements:
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program under which the Secretary makes grants to eligible entities, on a competitive basis, to support the development and evaluation of civics education programs.
(b) Application.—To be eligible to receive a grant under this section an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary of Defense an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require. Applications submitted under this subsection shall be evaluated on the basis of merit pursuant to competitive procedures prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.
(c) Selection criteria.—To be selected to receive a grant under this section an eligible entity shall demonstrate each of the following to the satisfaction of the Secretary:
(1) The civics education program proposed by the entity will include innovative approaches for improving civics education.
(d) Geographic distribution.—To the extent practicable, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure an equitable geographic distribution of grants under this section.
(e) Consultation.—In awarding grants under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of Education.
(f) Uses of funds.—
(1) REQUIRED USES OF FUNDS.—An eligible entity that receives a grant under this section shall use such grant—
(2) ALLOWABLE USES OF FUNDS.—An eligible entity that receives a grant under this section may use such grant for—
(B) classroom activities, thesis projects, individual or team projects, internships, or community service activities relating to civics;
(C) collaboration with government entities, nonprofit organizations, or consortia of such entities and organizations to provide participants with civics-related experiences;
(E) recruitment of educators who are highly qualified in civics education to teach civics or to assist with the development of curricula for civics education;
(F) presentation of seminars, workshops, and training for the development of skills associated with civic engagement;
(a) Fellowship program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, may establish a civilian fellowship program designed to place eligible individuals within the Department of Defense to increase the number of national security professionals with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics credentials employed by the Department.
(2) DESIGNATION.—The fellowship program established under paragraph (1) shall be known as the “Technology and National Security Fellowship” (in this section referred to as the “fellows program”).
(b) Eligible individuals.—For purposes of this section, and subject to subsection (f)(3), an eligible individual is any individual who—
(2) either—
(A) expects to be awarded an undergraduate or graduate degree that, as determined by the Secretary, focuses on science, technology, engineering, or mathematics course work not later than 180 days after the date on which the individual submits an application for participation in the fellows program; or
(B) possesses an undergraduate or graduate degree that, as determined by the Secretary, focuses on science, technology, engineering, or mathematics course work that was awarded not earlier than one year before the date on which the individual submits an application for participation in the fellows program.
(c) Application required.—Each individual seeking to participate in the fellows program shall submit to the Secretary an application therefor at such time and in such manner as the Secretary shall specify.
(d) Coordination.—
(f) Modifications to fellows program.—As the Secretary considers necessary to modify the fellows program, and in coordination with the entities specified in subsection (d)(2), as the Secretary considers appropriate, the Secretary may—
(g) Consultation.—The Secretary may consult with the heads of the agencies, components, and other elements of the Department of Defense and such institutions of higher education and private entities engaged in work on national security and emerging technologies as the Secretary considers appropriate for purposes of the fellows program, including fellowship assignments.
(a) Establishment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is established in the executive branch an independent Commission to review the state of defense research at covered institutions.
(2) TREATMENT.—The Commission shall be considered an independent establishment of the Federal Government as defined by section 104 of title 5, United States Code, and a temporary organization under section 3161 of such title.
(3) DESIGNATION.—The Commission established under paragraph (1) shall be known as the “National Security Commission on Defense Research At Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Other Minority Institutions”.
(4) MEMBERSHIP.—
(A) COMPOSITION.—The Commission shall be composed of 11 members appointed as follows:
(v) The Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives shall appoint 1 member.
(vi) The Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives shall appoint 1 member.
(vi) The Chairman of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate shall appoint 1 member.
(viii) The Ranking Member of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate shall appoint 1 member.
(B) DEADLINE FOR APPOINTMENT.—Members shall be appointed to the Commission under subparagraph (A) not later than 90 days after the date on which the commission is established.
(C) EFFECT OF LACK OF APPOINTMENT BY APPOINTMENT DATE.—If one or more appointments under subparagraph (A) is not made by the appointment date specified in subparagraph (B), or if a position described in subparagraph (A) is vacant for more than 90 days, the authority to make such appointment shall transfer to the Chair of the Commission.
(b) Duties.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall carry out the review described in paragraph (2). In carrying out such review, the Commission shall consider the methods and means necessary to advance research capacity at covered institutions to comprehensively address the national security and defense needs of the United States.
(2) SCOPE OF THE REVIEW.—In conducting the review under paragraph (1), the Commission shall consider the following:
(A) The competitiveness of covered institutions in developing, pursuing, capturing, and executing defense research with the Department of Defense through contracts and grants.
(B) Means and methods for advancing the capacity of covered institutions to conduct research related to national security and defense.
(C) The advancements and investments necessary to elevate covered institutions to R2 status on the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, covered institutions to R1 status on the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, one covered institution or a consortium of multiple covered institutions to the capability of a University Affiliated Research Center, and identify the candidate institutions for each category.
(D) The facilities and infrastructure for defense-related research at covered institutions as compared to the facilities and infrastructure at universities classified as R1 status on the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
(F) The legal and organizational structure of the contracting entity of covered institutions as compared to the legal and organizational structure of the contracting entity of covered institutions at universities classified as R1 status on the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
(G) The ability of covered institutions to develop, protect, and commercialize intellectual property created through defense-related research.
(H) The amount of defense research funding awarded to all colleges and universities through contracts and grants for the fiscal years of 2010 through 2019, including—
(ii) the total value of contracts and grants awarded to the organization during fiscal years 2010 to 2019;
(I) Areas for improvement in the programs executed under section 2362 of title 10, United States Code, the existing authorization to enhance defense-related research and education at covered institutions.
(c) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the President and Congress an initial report on the findings of the Commission and such recommendations that the Commission may have for action by the executive branch and Congress related to the covered institutions participating in Department of Defense research and actions necessary to expand their research capacity.
(e) Covered institution defined.—In this section, the term “covered institution” means—
(1) a part B institution (as that term is defined in section 322(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1061(2)); or
(2) any other institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1001)) at which not less than 50 percent of the total student enrollment consists of students from ethnic groups that are underrepresented in the fields of science and engineering.
Funds are here by authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301.
Section 183a(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “60 days” and inserting “90 days”.
Section 183a(d)(2)(E) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 183a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “for a project filed with the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to section 44718 of title 49” and inserting “for an energy project”.
Section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (j) the following new subsection (k):
“(k) Improvement of conveyed utility systems.—In the case of a utility system that is conveyed under this section and that only provides utility services to a military installation, the Secretary concerned may use amounts authorized to be appropriated for military construction to improve the reliability, resilience, efficiency, physical security, or cybersecurity of the utility system.”.
(a) In general.—Section 2707 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Temporary authority for National Guard projects.—Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section and section 2701(c)(1) of this title, during the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary concerned may carry out an environmental restoration project if the Secretary determines that the project is necessary to carry out a response to perfluorooctanoic acid or perfluorooctane sulfonate contamination under this chapter or CERCLA.”.
(b) Savings clause.—Nothing in this section, or the amendment made by this section, shall affect any requirement or authority under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.).
Section 2916(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) in subparagraph (B)—
(A) by striking “shall be available” and all that follows and inserting “shall be provided directly to the commander of the military installation in which the geothermal energy resource is located to be used for—”; and
Section 316(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1350), as amended by section 315(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), is amended by striking “2019 and 2020” and inserting “2019, 2020, and 2021”.
(a) Use of fluorine-Free foam at military installations.—Not later than January 31, 2025, the Secretary of the Navy shall publish a military specification for a fluorine-free fire-fighting agent for use at all military installations to ensure such agent is available for use by not later than 2027.
(b) Prohibition on use.—Fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam may not be used at any military installation on or after September 30, 2029, or before such date, if possible.
(c) Waiver.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may grant a waiver to the prohibition under subsection (b) with respect to the use of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam at a specific military installation if the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees, by not later than 30 days prior to issuing the waiver—
(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided by subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall prohibit the uncontrolled release of fluorinated aqueous film-forming foam (hereinafter in this section referred to as “AFFF”) at military installations.
The Secretary of Defense shall prohibit the use of fluorinated aqueous film forming foam for training exercises at military installations.
(a) Real-Time monitoring.—The Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Air Force shall each conduct a real-time noise-monitoring study at no fewer than three Navy installations and three Air Force installations. In conducting such study, the Secretaries shall—
(b) Report required.—Not later than December 1, 2020, the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Air Force shall jointly submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the real-time noise monitoring required under subsection (a). Such report shall include—
(2) a comparison of such monitoring and the noise contours previously developed with the analysis and modeling methods previously used;
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a climate vulnerability and risk assessment tool to assist the military departments in measuring how the risks associated with climate change impact networks, systems, installations, facilities, and other assets, as well as the operational plans and capabilities of the Department of Defense.
(b) Consultation.—In developing the tool under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of the Interior, the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Commander of the Army Corps of Engineers, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, a federally funded research and development center, and the heads of such other relevant Federal agencies as the Secretary of Defense determines appropriate.
(c) Prevailing scientific consensus.—Before completing development of the tool under subsection (a), the Secretary shall obtain from a federally funded research and development center with which the Secretary has consulted under subsection (b) a certification in writing that the tool contains a methodology that adequately incorporates the prevailing scientific consensus on climate change.
(d) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the tool developed under subsection (a).
(e) Updates to tool.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—After submittal of the report under subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense shall update the climate vulnerability and risk assessment tool developed under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers necessary and appropriate, in consultation with the individuals and entities described in subsection (b) and consistent with the prevailing scientific consensus as required under subsection (c).
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (in this section referred to as “PFOS”) and perfluorooctanoic acid (in this section referred to as “PFOA”) are part of a class of man-made chemicals that have been used in a variety of industrial and consumer products to make the products resist heat, stains, water, and grease. Because PFOS and PFOA extinguish petroleum fires quickly, the Department of Defense and commercial airports began using aqueous film forming foam containing PFOS and PFOA in the 1970s.
(2) PFOS and PFOA can accumulate and stay in the body for long periods of time. Exposure to PFOS and PFOA may cause health problems, including issues with the reproductive system, liver and kidney damage, developmental issues in children, and negatively impacted immune system, and cancer.
(4) The Environmental Protection Agency issued lifetime health advisories under the Safe Drinking Water Act for individual or combined PFOS and PFOA concentrations at 70 parts per trillion in 2016, but has not yet issued any guidance or regulation for groundwater or agricultural water.
(5) The Department of Defense has provided mitigations in many communities where drinking water has tested at or above the lifetime health advisory level, including bottled water and drinking water filtration systems. Due to the lack of regulatory guidance, these mitigations have not been mirrored in agricultural water systems.
(b) Authority to provide uncontaminated water for agricultural purposes.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—If an area has been identified under paragraph (2), and a military installation has been determined to be the source of that contamination, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary concerned may provide, for the purpose of producing agricultural products destined for human consumption—
(2) IDENTIFICATION OF AREAS.—An area identified under this paragraph is an area for which the level of PFOA or PFOS contamination—
(A) is above the lifetime health advisory for contamination for such compounds as issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and printed in the Federal Register on May 25, 2016;
(c) Sense of Congress regarding land acquisition.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary concerned should explore authorities under which the Secretary could acquire land the land adjacent to military installations where the owners of the land have experienced impacts to their livelihood due to PFOS and PFOA contamination that has been verified to have been caused by that installation, including the authorities under sections 2663, 2864a, and 2869 of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Material readiness metrics and objectives.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 117 the following new section:
Ҥ 118. Material readiness metrics and objectives
“(a) Guidance.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall issue and maintain guidance requiring the implementation and use of material readiness metrics to enable assessment of the readiness of armed forces to carry out the national defense strategy required by section 113 of this title.
“(b) Metrics.—At a minimum, the material readiness metrics required by subsection (a) shall address the material availability, operational availability, and material reliability of each major weapon system by designated mission design series, variant, or class.
“(c) Material readiness objectives.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish, and annually review and revise, an objective value for each metric required by subsection (b) as a necessary component to support the review and revision of the national defense strategy required by section 113 of this title.
“(d) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘major weapons system’ has the meaning given the term ‘major system’ under section 2302(5) of this title, except that such term does not include an acquisition program for a defense business system (as defined in section 2222(i)(1) of this title).
“(2) The term ‘material availability’ means the measure of the percentage of the total inventory of a system that is operationally capable of performing an assigned mission.
Section 2208(u) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Limitation on use of funds.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available in this Act for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment for fiscal year 2020, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Under Secretary submits the report required by subsection (b).
(b) Report required.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on steps being taken to improve the availability and accountability of F–35 parts within the supply chain. At a minimum, the report shall include a detailed plan for each of the following elements:
(1) How the accountable property system of record will be updated with information from the prime contractors supplying such parts on required cost and related data with respect to the parts and how the F–35 Program Office will ensure such contractors are adhering to contractual requirements for the management, reporting, visibility, and accountability of all such parts supplied by the prime contractors.
(2) How the accountability property system of record will have interfaces that allow the F–35 Program Office and other authorized entities to have proper accountability of assets in accordance with applicable Department of Defense Instructions, Department of Defense Manuals, and other applicable regulations.
(a) Report required.—Not later than March 1, 2020, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, in coordination with the Joint Staff, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the implementation plan for prepositioned materiel and equipment required by section 321(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 730; 10 U.S.C. 2229 note). Such report shall include each of the following:
(1) A comprehensive list of the prepositioned materiel and equipment programs of the Department of Defense.
(3) A description of the resources required to implement the plan, including the amount of funds and personnel.
(b) Limitation on use of funds.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available in this Act for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment for fiscal year 2020, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Assistant Secretary submits the report required by subsection (a).
(a) Limitation.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Navy for fiscal year 2020 may be obligated or expended for any construction, alteration, repair, or development of the real property consisting of the Former Ship Repair Facility in Guam.
(b) Exception.—The limitation under subsection (a) does not apply to any project that directly supports depot-level ship maintenance capabilities, including the mooring of a floating dry dock.
(c) Former Ship Repair Facility in Guam.—In this section, the term “Former Ship Repair Facility in Guam” means the property identified by that name under the base realignment and closure authority carried out under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note).
(b) Quarterly reports.—Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the section heading, by striking “Quarterly reports: personnel and unit readiness” and inserting “Readiness reports”;
(2) in subsection (a)—
(A) In the subsection heading, by striking “ Quarterly Reports Required” and inserting “Reports and briefings”;
(C) by striking the second and third sentences and inserting “The Secretary of Defense shall submit each such report in writing and shall also submit a copy of each such report to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.”; and
(3) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
“(b) Required elements.—The elements described in this subsection are each of the following:
“(1) A description of each readiness problem or deficiency that affects the ground, sea, air, space, cyber, or special operations forces, and any other area determined appropriate by the Secretary of Defense.
“(2) The key contributing factors, indicators, and other relevant information related to each identified problem or deficiency.
“(3) The short-term mitigation strategy the Department will employ to address each readiness problem or deficiency until a resolution is in place, as well as the timeline, cost, and any legislative remedies required to support the resolution.
“(4) A summary of combat readiness ratings for the key force elements assessed, including specific information on personnel, supply, equipment, and training problems or deficiencies that affect the combat readiness ratings for each force element.
“(5) A summary of each upgrade or downgrade of the combat readiness of a unit that was issued by the commander of the unit, together with the rationale of the commander for the issuance of such upgrade or downgrade.
“(6) A summary of the readiness of supporting capabilities, including infrastructure, prepositioned equipment and supplies, and mobility assets, and other supporting logistics capabilities.
“(7) A summary of the readiness of the combat support and related agencies, any readiness problem or deficiency affecting any mission essential tasks of any such agency, and actions recommended to address any such problem or deficiency.
“(8) A list of all Class A, Class B, and Class C mishaps that occurred in operations related to combat support and training events involving aviation, ground, or naval platforms, weapons, space, or Government vehicles, as defined by Department of Defense Instruction 6055.07, or a successor instruction.
(6) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsections (d):
“(d) Semi-Annual joint force readiness review.— (1) Not later than 30 days after the last day of the first and third quarter of each calendar year, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to Congress a written report on the capability of the armed forces, the combat support and related agencies, operational contract support, and the geographic and functional combatant commands to execute their wartime missions based upon their posture and readiness as of the time the review is conducted.
“(2) The Chairman shall produce the report required under this subsection using information derived from the quarterly reports required by subsection (a).
Section 358(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) is amended by striking “October 1, 2019” and inserting “October 1, 2020”.
(a) In general.—Not later than March 1 of each of 2020, 2021, and 2022, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the Operation and Maintenance Ship Depot Maintenance budget sub-activity group.
(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following elements:
(1) A breakdown of funding, categorized by class of ship, requested for ship and submarine maintenance.
(2) A description of how the requested funding, categorized by class of ship, compares to the identified ship maintenance requirement.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the Committee on Natural Resources, and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report on the status of the Runit Dome in the Marshal Islands.
(b) Matters for inclusion.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) A detailed plan to remove the radioactive materials in the dome to a safer and more stable location, including a predicted timeline and associated costs.
(2) A detailed plan to repair the dome to ensure that it does not have any harmful effects to the local population, environment, or wildlife, including the projected costs of implementing such plan.
(3) The effects on the environment that the dome has currently and is projected to have in 5 years, 10 years, and 20 years.
(7) How climate change and rising sea levels are predicted to affect the dome, including a description of projected scenarios if the dome becomes partially or fully submerged by ocean water.
(8) A summary of interactions between the Government of the United States and the government of the Marshall Islands about the dome.
Section 183a(c)(6) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “or airport surveillance radar” and inserting “, airport surveillance radar, or wide area surveillance over-the-horizon radar”.
Section 2642(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “October 1, 2019” and inserting “October 1, 2024”.
Section 2583 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(4) in subsection (e)—
(5) in subsection (f)—
Section 44310(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2019” and inserting “September 30, 2023”.
(a) Advisory group.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established an advisory group on the defense personal property program, to be known as the “Global Household Relocation Services Advisory Committee”.
(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The advisory group shall be comprised of 15 members appointed from among individuals who represent appropriate entities as follows:
(A) One member representing United States Transportation Command appointed by the Commander of United States Transportation Command.
(B) A flag or general officer of the Armed Forces representing each of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard appointed by the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, Vice Chief of Naval Operations, Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force, the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps, and Vice Commandant of the Coast Guard, respectively.
(3) MEETINGS.—The advisory group shall convene regularly to provide to the Secretary of Defense feedback on the execution of, and any recommended changes to, the global household goods contract.
(b) Business case analysis.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commander of United States Transportation Command shall prepare a business case analysis for the proposed award of a global household goods contract for the defense personal property program.
(c) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated in this Act for fiscal year 2020 shall be available to enter into a global household goods contract until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Commander of United States Transportation Command provides to the congressional defense committees a briefing on—
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Innovative Readiness Training program is an effective training program for members of the Armed Forces and is highly beneficial to civilian-military relationships with local American communities;
(2) due to the geographic complexities and realities of non-contiguous States and territories, Innovative Readiness Training has lent greater benefit to such States and territories while providing unique and realistic training opportunities and deployment readiness for members of the Armed Forces;
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a five-year pilot program under which the commander of a military installation may provide funds for the purpose of installing noise insulation on private residences impacted by military aviation noise from the installation.
(b) Eligibility.—To be eligible to receive funds under the pilot program, a recipient shall enter into an agreement with the commander to—
(c) Use of funds.—Funds provided under the pilot program shall be used for the installation of noise insulation at a residence—
The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2020, as follows:
Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs:
(a) In general.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2020, as follows:
(b) End strength reductions.—The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—
(c) End strength increases.—Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.
Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2020, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components:
The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2020 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following:
During fiscal year 2020, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.
Section 661(d)(3)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the third sentence by inserting “or a designee of the Chairman who is an officer of the armed forces in grade O-8 or higher” before the period.
Section 7084 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “An officer appointed to that position who holds a lower grade shall be appointed in the grade of brigadier general.”
(a) In general.—Section 14108 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(f) Higher placement of officers of particular merit on promotion list.— (1) In selecting officers to be recommended for promotion, a promotion board may, when authorized by the Secretary concerned, recommend that officers of particular merit, from among those officers selected for promotion, be placed higher on the promotion list established by the Secretary under section 14308(a) of this title.
(b) Reports regarding recommendations that officers of particular merit be placed higher on promotion list.—Section 14109 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) Report of officers recommended for higher placement on promotion list.—A promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title shall, when authorized under section 14108(f) of this title, include in its report to the Secretary concerned—
(a) Availability required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of each military department shall make available on an internet website of such department available to the public information specified in paragraph (2) on each officer in a general or flag officer grade under the jurisdiction of such Secretary, including any such officer on the reserve active-status list.
(b) Additional public notice on certain officers.—Whenever an officer in a grade of O–7 or above is assigned to a new billet or reassigned from a current billet, the Secretary of the military department having jurisdiction of such officer shall make available on an internet website of such department available to the public a notice of such assignment or reassignment.
(c) Limitation on withholding of certain information or notice.—
(1) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of a military department may not withhold the information or notice specified in subsections (a) and (b) from public availability pursuant to subsection (a), unless and until the Secretary notifies the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives in writing of the information or notice that will be so withheld, together with justification for withholding the information or notice from public availability.
(2) LIMITED DURATION OF WITHHOLDING.—The Secretary concerned may withhold from the public under paragraph (1) information or notice on an officer only on the basis of individual risk or national security, and may continue to withhold such information or notice only for so long as the basis for withholding remains in force.
(a) In general.—
(1) CHIEF OF ARMY RESERVE.—Section 7038(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “general officers of the Army Reserve” and inserting “officers of the Army Reserve in the grade of lieutenant general and”.
(2) CHIEF OF NAVY RESERVE.—Section 8083(b)(1) of such title is amended by striking “flag officers of the Navy (as defined in section 8001(1))” and inserting “officers of the Navy Reserve in the grade of vice admiral and”.
Section 14703(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (2):
“(2) The Secretary concerned may, with the consent of the officer, retain in an active status an officer in a medical specialty described in subsection (a) beyond the date described in paragraph (1) of this subsection if the Secretary concerned determines that such retention is necessary to the military department concerned. Each such retention shall be made on a case-by-case basis and for such period as the Secretary concerned determines appropriate.”.
Section 1113 of the Army National Guard Combat Readiness Reform Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 10105 note) is repealed.
(a) New guidance.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue new guidance that treats the use of unmanned aircraft systems by the National Guard for covered activities in a manner no more restrictive than the use of other aircraft for covered activities.
Chapter 102 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2036. Computer science and cybersecurity program
“(a) Program authorized.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program to enhance the preparation of students in the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps for careers in computer science and cybersecurity.
“(b) Coordination.—In carrying out the program, the Secretary shall coordinate with the following:
“(c) Activities.—Activities under the program may include the following:
“(1) Establishment of targeted internships and cooperative research opportunities in computer science and cybersecurity at defense laboratories and other technical centers for students in and instructors of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.
“(2) Funding for training and other supports for instructors to teach evidence-based courses in computer science and cybersecurity to students.
“(d) Metrics.—The Secretary shall establish outcome-based metrics and internal and external assessments to evaluate the merits and benefits of activities conducted under the program with respect to the needs of the Department of Defense.
“(e) Authorities.—In carrying out the program, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make use of the authorities under section 2193b, chapter 111, and sections 2601, 2605, and 2374a of this title, section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note), and other authorities the Secretary determines appropriate.
(a) Programs authorized.—Each Secretary of a military department may carry out a program to award scholarships to qualified members of units of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps under the jurisdiction of such Secretary to assist such members in obtaining a private pilot's certificate through an institution of higher education with an accredited aviation program that is approved by such Secretary pursuant to subsection (c).
(b) Member qualifications.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out a program under subsection (a), the Secretary of a military department shall prescribe the standards to be met by members of units of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps under the jurisdiction of such Secretary to be eligible for the award of a scholarship under the program.
(c) Approved institutions of higher education.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out a program under subsection (a), the Secretary of a military department shall maintain a list of institutions of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) at which a scholarship awarded under the program may be used toward obtaining a private pilot's certificate.
(2) QUALIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS.—Any institution of higher education included on a list under this subsection, and any course of instruction toward obtaining a private pilot's certificate offered by such institution, shall meet such qualifications and standards as the Secretary shall prescribe for purposes of the program. Such qualifications and standards shall include a requirement that any institution included on the list award academic credit at such institution to any member awarded a scholarship under the program for work (whether or not fully completed) on the ground school course of instruction of such institution in connection with obtaining a private pilot's certificate.
(d) Scholarship.—
(1) AMOUNT.—The amount of the scholarship awarded a member of a Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps under a program under subsection (a) shall be such amount as the Secretary of the military department concerned considers appropriate to defray, whether in whole or in part, the charges and fees of a course of instruction toward obtaining a private pilot's certificate offered by the institution of higher education to be attended by the member in obtaining the certificate.
(e) Annual reports on programs.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than February 28, 2021, and each year thereafter, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to Congress a report on the program, if any, carried out by such Secretary during the preceding calendar year.
(f) Assessment of related pilot program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report setting forth the results of an assessment, conducted by the study group described in paragraph (2) for purposes of the report, of the pilot program conducted by the Air Force in 2018 and 2019 known as the “Air Force JROTC Flight Academy, Chief of Staff Private Pilot Scholarship Program”.
(2) STUDY GROUP.—The study group described in this paragraph shall include the following:
(B) A representative of the headquarters of the Air Force Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps with experience with the pilot program, selected by the Secretary of the Air Force.
(C) In addition to the representative under subparagraph (B), a representative of each military department, selected by the Secretary of such military department.
(3) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall identify best practices in assisting members of the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps in obtaining a private pilot's certificate through institutions of higher education, including the most appropriate funding mechanisms for such practices.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (referred to in this section as “JROTC”) contributes to an enhanced sense of pride in our Nation and in the members of the Armed Forces who serve;
(2) JROTC develops a culture dedicated to service of our great land and reinforces duty, honor and courage;
(3) the Nation has been steadily depending on a smaller and smaller minority of the population to fight its wars and protect its borders;
(4) this dwindling population risks the long-term security of our Nation and the freedoms it provides;
(6) JROTC was supported in the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) and should be increased in fiscal year 2020, including at least 3,700 JROTC units nationwide.
(a) Establishment.—Chapter 79 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1553 the following new section 1553a:
Ҥ 1553a. Board of Discharge Appeals
“(a) Establishment.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a Board of Discharge Appeals to hear appeals of requests for upgraded discharges and dismissals under section 1553 of this title that are denied by the service review agencies.
“(b) Appeal.— (1) Upon the request of an appellant, the Board of Discharge Appeals shall review the findings and decisions of a service review agency regarding the review of the discharge or dismissal of the appellant.
“(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Technical and conforming amendments.—
(1) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1553 the following new item:
“1553a. Board of Discharge Appeals.”.
(c) Deadline.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and implement the Board of Discharge Appeals under such section 1553a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), not later than September 30, 2020.
(d) Training.—Each member of the Board of Discharge Appeals established under such section 1553a shall receive training under section 534(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 1552 note).
(e) Reporting.—
(1) REPORT.—Not later than April 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report regarding the Board of Discharge Appeals established under such section 1553a. The report shall include, with respect to appeals heard by the Board of Discharge Appeals since implementation, the following:
(b) Report.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives that details a plan to—
(a) Establishment.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a Department of Defense Advisory Committee to be known as the “Defense Advisory Committee on Record and Upgrade Review Boards” (in this section referred to as the “Advisory Committee”).
(b) Membership.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Advisory Committee shall consist of not more than 15 members appointed by the Secretary of Defense, eight of whom shall be civilian practitioners or representatives of organizations that have experience assisting members of the Armed Forces and veterans with cases before service review boards (as that term is defined in section 1555 of title 10, United States Code).
(c) Personnel.—
(1) EXPERIENCE REQUIRED.—At least 35 percent of members of the staff of the Advisory Committee shall have experience described in subsection (b)(1).
(d) Duties.—The Advisory Committee shall advise the Secretary of Defense on the best structure, practices, and procedures to ensure consistency of boards for the correction of military records and service review boards in carrying out their responsibilities under chapter 79 of title 10, United States Code, and in granting relief to claimants under that chapter.
(e) Annual report.—Not later than one year after the date of the establishment of the Advisory Committee and annually thereafter for the three subsequent years, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees a report containing observations and recommendations regarding issues of board operations and efficacy, including—
(f) Termination.—The Advisory Committee shall terminate on the date that is four years after the date of establishment under subsection (a).
(g) Authorities.—The Advisory Committee shall have all normal authorities granted to advisory committees, including the ability for staff to request documents from the Department of Defense, hold public hearings, and travel in furtherance of the board mandate. The board shall also be permitted, with assistance from personnel of the Department of Defense, to administer surveys and conduct field experiments to assess the viability of different policy options considered in the course of the activities of the Advisory Committee.
Upon the submission to the Secretary of a military department or a designated commissioned officer serving in the pay grade O-6 or higher by a member of the Armed Forces of a completed United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Form N–426, the Secretary or the Officer shall—
(1) in the case of a member of the Armed Forces who has served or is serving honorably on active duty, provide certification that the nature of the member’s service has been honorable by not later than five days from receiving the form;
(2) in the case of a member of the Armed Forces who has served or is serving honorably in a Reserve Component of the Armed Forces, provide such certification by not later than three weeks from receiving the form; and
(3) in the case of a member of the Armed Forces whose service has been other than honorable, provide to the member notice that a certification of honorable service will not be provided and justification for why such certification will not be provided—
The Secretary of Defense may not take any action to implement the memorandum titled “Military Service Suitability Determinations for Foreign Nationals Who Are Lawful Permanent Residents”, issued by the Secretary and dated October 13, 2017, until the Secretary reports to the congressional defense committees the justification for the policy changes required by such memorandum.
(a) Plan required.—The Secretary of Defense shall design and implement a five-year strategic plan for diversity and inclusion in the Department of Defense.
(a) Independent study.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center under which the center will conduct a study on barriers to entry into the Armed Forces for English learners.
(b) Elements.—The study under subsection (a) shall—
(1) identify barriers to entry into the Armed Forces for English learners, including—
(c) Submittal to Department of Defense.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and development that conducts the study under subsection (a) shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a report on the results of the study.
(d) Submittal to Congress.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense receives the report under subsection (c), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees an unaltered copy of the report and any comments of the Secretary with respect to the report.
(e) English learner defined.—In this section, the term “English learner” has the meaning given that term in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations that permit any Secretary of a military department to grant a reenlistment waiver to a covered person if the Secretary determines that the reenlistment of that covered person is vital to the national interest.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) United States Military Entrance Processing Command (“USMEPCOM”) operates 65 Military Entrance Processing Stations (“MEPS”) dispersed throughout the 50 States and Puerto Rico.
(2) Applicants for accession into the Armed Forces must travel to the closest MEPS to receive physical examinations, are often driven by a military recruiter, and receive lodging at a nearby hotel, paid for by the Armed Force represented by that recruiter.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should explore alternatives to centralized accession physicals at MEPS, including conducting physicals through community health care providers, in order to reduce transportation costs, increase efficiency in processing times, and free recruiters to focus on the core of the recruiting mission.
(a) In general.—Section 837 of title 10, United States Code (article 37 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
“(a) (1) No court-martial convening authority, nor any other commanding officer, may censure, reprimand, or admonish the court or any member, military judge, or counsel thereof, with respect to the findings or sentence adjudged by the court, or with respect to any other exercise of its or his functions in the conduct of the proceeding.
“(2) No court-martial convening authority, nor any other commanding officer, may deter or attempt to deter a potential witness from participating in the investigatory process or testifying at a court-martial. The denial of a request to travel at government expense or refusal to make a witness available shall not by itself constitute unlawful command influence.
“(3) No person subject to this chapter may attempt to coerce or, by any unauthorized means, attempt to influence the action of a court-martial or any other military tribunal or any member thereof, in reaching the findings or sentence in any case, or the action of any convening, approving, or reviewing authority or preliminary hearing officer with respect to such acts taken pursuant to this chapter as prescribed by the President.
“(4) Paragraphs (1) through (3) shall not apply with respect to—
“(A) general instructional or informational courses in military justice if such courses are designed solely for the purpose of instructing members of a command in the substantive and procedural aspects of courts-martial;
“(5) (A) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through (3), but subject to subparagraph (B)—
“(i) a superior convening authority or officer may generally discuss matters to consider regarding the disposition of alleged violations of this chapter with a subordinate convening authority or officer; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
“(c) No finding or sentence of a court-martial may be held incorrect on the ground of a violation of this section unless the violation materially prejudices the substantial rights of the accused.
“(d) (1) A superior convening authority or commanding officer may withhold the authority of a subordinate convening authority or officer to dispose of offenses in individual cases, types of cases, or generally.
“(2) Except as provided in paragraph (1) or as otherwise authorized by this chapter, a superior convening authority or commanding officer may not limit the discretion of a subordinate convening authority or officer to act with respect to a case for which the subordinate convening authority or officer has authority to dispose of the offenses.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning subchapter VII of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking the item relating to section 837 (article 37) and inserting the following new item:
“837. Art. 37. Command influence.”.
(c) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to violations of section 837 of title 10, United States Code (article 37 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), committed on or after such date.
(a) In general.—Section 843 of title 10, United States Code (article 43 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to the prosecution of offenses committed before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act if the applicable limitation period has not yet expired.
(a) Guidelines required.—Not later than the date specified in subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall establish nonbinding guidelines on sentences for offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice). The guidelines shall provide the sentencing authority with a suggested range of punishments, including suggested ranges of confinement, that will generally be appropriate for a violation of each offense under such chapter.
(b) Sentencing data.—In developing the guidelines for sentences under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall take into account the sentencing data collected by the Military Justice Review Panel pursuant to section 946(f)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 146(f)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(c) Date specified.—The date specified in this subsection is the date that is not later than one year after the date on the which the first report of the Military Justice Review Panel is submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives pursuant to section 946(f)(5) of title 10, United States Code (article 146(f)(5) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(a) Notification of victims of events in military justice process.—
(1) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.—The commander of a member of the Armed Forces who is the alleged victim of sexual assault committed by another member of the Armed Forces shall provide notification to such alleged victim of every key or other significant event in the military justice process in connection with the investigation, prosecution, and confinement of such other member for sexual assault.
(b) Documetation of victim’s preference on jurisdiction in prosecution.—In the case of a member of the Armed Forces who is the alleged victim of sexual assault committed by another member of the Armed Forces who is subject to prosecution for such offense both by court-martial under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and by a civilian court under State law, the commander of such alleged victim shall create and maintain appropriate documentation of the expressed preference, if any, of such alleged victim for prosecution of such offense by court-martial or by a civilian court as provided for by Rule 306(e) of the Rules for Court-Martial.
(a) Military criminal investigative services.—
(1) MINIMUM STAFFING LEVEL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall ensure that the number of personnel assigned to the military criminal investigative services of the department is sufficient to ensure, to the extent practicable, that the investigation of any sex-related offense is completed not later than six months after the date on which the investigation is initiated.
(2) STATUS REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, Secretary of each military department shall issue guidance requiring that any criminal investigator of the department who is assigned to investigate a sex-related offense submits a status report to the direct supervisor of such investigator in the event that the investigation of such offense exceeds 90 days in duration. Each status report shall include—
(b) Victim Witness Assistance Program liaisons.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of each military department shall increase the number of personnel serving as Victim Witness Assistance Program liaisons to address personnel shortages in the Victim Witness Assistance Program.
(a) In general.—Each Secretary of a military department shall take appropriate actions to increase the number of digital forensic examiners in each military criminal investigation organization (MCIO) under the jurisdiction of such Secretary by not fewer than 10 from the authorized number of such examiners for such organization as of September 30, 2019.
(b) Military criminal investigation organizations.—For purposes of this section, the military criminal investigation organizations are the following:
(c) Funding.—Funds for additional digital forensic examiners as required by subsection (a) for fiscal year 2020, including for compensation, initial training, and equipment, shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for that fiscal year for the Armed Force concerned for operation and maintenance.
(a) In general.—Each Secretary of a military department shall carry out a pilot program on defense investigators within the military justice system under the jurisdiction of such Secretary in order to do the following:
(b) Elements.—
(c) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot programs under subsection (a).
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of each pilot program, including the personnel and activities of defense investigators under such pilot program.
(B) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing and maintaining defense investigators as an element of the military justice systems of the military departments.
(C) If the assessment under subparagraph (B) is that the establishment and maintenance of defense investigators as an element of the military justice systems of the military departments is feasible and advisable, such recommendations for legislative and administrative action as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate to establish and maintain defense investigators as an element of the military justice systems.
(a) Pilot program.—Beginning not later than January 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program (referred to in this section as the “Pilot Program”) under which the Secretary shall establish, in accordance with this section, an independent authority to—
(b) Office of the Chief Prosecutor.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—As part of the Pilot Program, the Secretary shall establish, within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, an Office of the Chief Prosecutor.
(2) HEAD OF OFFICE.—The head of the Office shall be known as the Chief Prosecutor. The Secretary shall appoint as the Chief Prosecutor a commissioned officer in the grade of O–7 or above who—
(3) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Chief Prosecutor shall exercise the authorities described in subsection (c) but only with respect to covered special victim offenses.
(c) Referral to Office of the Chief Prosecutor.—
(1) INVESTIGATION PHASE.—
(2) REFERRAL TO CHIEF PROSECUTOR.—In the case of a charge relating to a covered special victim offense, in addition to referring the charge to the staff judge advocate under subsection (a) or (b) of section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the convening authority of the Armed Force of which the accused is a member shall refer, as soon as reasonably practicable, the charge to the Chief Prosecutor to make the determination required by paragraph (3).
(3) PROSECUTORIAL DETERMINATION.—The Chief Prosecutor shall make a determination regarding whether a charge relating to a covered special victim offense shall be referred to trial. If the Chief Prosecutor makes a determination that the charge shall be tried by court-martial, the Chief Prosecutor also shall determine whether the charge shall be tried by a general court-martial convened under section 822 of title 10, United States Code (article 22 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) or a special court-martial convened under section 823 of such title (article 23 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). The determination of whether to try a charge relating to a covered special victim offense by court-martial shall include a determination of whether to try any known offenses, including any lesser included offenses.
(4) EFFECT OF DETERMINATION AND APPEALS PROCESS.—
(A) DETERMINATION TO PROCEED TO TRIAL.—Subject to subparagraph (C) determination to try a charge relating to a covered special victim offense by court-martial under paragraph (3), and the determination as to the type of court-martial, shall be binding on any convening authority under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) for a trial by court-martial on the charge.
(B) DETERMINATION NOT TO PROCEED TO TRIAL.—Subject to subparagraph (C) determination under paragraph (3) not to proceed to trial on a charge relating to a covered special victim offense by general or special court-martial shall be binding on any convening authority under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) except that such determination shall not operate to terminate or otherwise alter the authority of the convening authority—
(C) APPEAL.—In a case in which a convening authority and the staff judge advocate advising such authority disagree with the determination of the Chief Prosecutor under paragraph (3), the convening authority and staff judge advocate may jointly appeal the determination to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense. The determination of the General Counsel with respect to such appeal shall be binding on the Chief Prosecutor and the convening authority concerned.
(5) TRIAL BY RANDOMIZED JURY.—After the Chief Prosecutor makes a determination under paragraph (3) to proceed to trial on a charge relating to a covered special victim offense, the matter shall be tried by a court-martial convened within the Armed Force of which the accused is a member in accordance with the applicable provisions of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) except that, when convening a court-martial that is a general or special court-martial involving a covered special victim offense in which the accused elects a jury trial, the convening authority shall detail members of the Armed Forces as members thereof at random unless the obtainability of members of the Armed Forces for such court-martial prevents the convening authority from detailing such members at random.
(d) Effect on other law.—This section shall supersede any provision of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), that is inconsistent with this section, but only to the extent of the inconsistency.
(e) Termination and transition.—
(1) TERMINATION.—The authority of the Secretary to carry out the Pilot Program shall terminate four years after the date on which the Pilot Program is initiated.
(2) TRANSITION.—The Secretary shall take such actions as are necessary to ensure that, on the date on which the Pilot Program terminates under paragraph (1), any matter referred to the Chief Prosecutor under subsection (c)(2), but with respect to which the Chief Prosecutor has not made a determination under subsection (c)(3), shall be transferred to the appropriate convening authority for consideration.
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “Armed Force” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code.
(2) The term “covered special victim offense” means a special victim offense—
(4) The term “special victim offense” means any of the following:
(A) An offense under section 917a, 920, 920b, 920c, or 930 of title 10, United States Code (article 117a, 120, 120b, 120c, or 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(B) A conspiracy to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A) as punishable under section 881 of such title (article 81 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(a) Policy required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a policy to ensure the timely disposition of nonprosecutable sex-related offenses in accordance with subsection (b).
(b) Elements.—The policy developed under subsection (a) shall require the following:
(1) Not later than seven days after the date on which a court-martial convening authority declines to refer a nonprosecutable sex-related offense for trial by general or special court-martial under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the convening authority will forward the investigation to the commander of the accused.
(2) Not later than 90 days after the date on which the commander of the accused receives the investigation under paragraph (1)—
(A) the commander will determine whether or not to take other judicial, nonjudicial, or administrative action in connection with the conduct covered by the investigation, including any lesser included offenses, as authorized under section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice); and
(c) Nonprosecutable sex-related offense defined.—In this section, the term “nonprosecutable sex-related offense” means an alleged sex-related offense (as that term is defined in section 1044e(g) of title 10, United States Code) that a court-martial convening authority has declined to refer for trial by a general or special court-martial under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) due to a determination that there is insufficient evidence to support prosecution of the sex-related offense.
(a) In general.—The training for sexual assault initial Disposition authorities on the exercise of disposition authority under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), with respect to cases for which disposition authority is withheld to such authorities by the April 20, 2012, memorandum of the Secretary of Defense, or any successor memorandum, shall include comprehensive training on the exercise by such authorities of such authority with respect to such cases in order to enhance the capabilities of such Authorities in the exercise of such authority and thereby promote confidence and trust in the military justice process with respect to such cases.
(b) Memorandum of Secretary of Defense.—The April 20, 2012, memorandum of the Secretary of Defense referred to in subsection (a) is the memorandum of the Secretary of Defense entitled “Withholding Initial Disposition Authority Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice in Certain Sexual Assault Cases” and dated April 20, 2012.
(a) Standard of evidence.—Section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) In general.—Section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the section heading, by striking “sex-related” and inserting “sex-related or domestic violence”;
(2) by striking “alleged sex-related offense” each place it appears and inserting “alleged sex-related offense or alleged domestic violence offense”;
(3) in subsection (a)—
(4) in subsection (b)(2), by inserting “or the Family Advocacy Program” after “Victim Witness Assistance Program”;
(5) in subsection (d)(2)—
(A) in subparagraph (A)—
(6) in subsection (f)(1), by inserting “a representative of the Family Advocacy Program,” after “Sexual Assault Victim Advocate,”;
(7) by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:
“(g) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘alleged sex-related offense’ means any allegation of—
(8) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
“(i) Minimum staffing level.—Not later than two years after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretaries concerned shall ensure that the number Special Victims’ Counsel serving in each military department is sufficient to ensure that the average caseload of a Special Victims’ Counsel does not exceed 25 cases at any given time.
“(j) Report required.—Not later than December 1, 2022, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries concerned, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report that includes—
“(1) an analysis of the caseloads of Special Victims’ Counsel and Special Victims’ Counsel Paralegals, respectively;
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 1044e and inserting the following new item:
“1044e. Special Victims' Counsel for victims of sex-related or domestic violence offenses.”.
(a) Notification of issuance.—Section 1567a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking “and any individual involved in the order does not reside on a military installation at any time during the duration of the military protective order, the commander of the military installation shall notify” and inserting “, the commander of the unit to which the member is assigned shall, not later than seven days after the date of the issuance of the order, notify”;
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b);
“(b) Notification in event of transfer.—In the event that a member of the armed forces against whom a military protective order is issued is transferred to another unit—
(b) Annual report required.—Not later than March 1, 2020, and each year thereafter through 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that identifies—
(a) Clarification regarding definition of rights and benefits.—Section 4303(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Clarification regarding relation to other law and plans for agreements.—Section 4302 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(c) (1) Pursuant to this section and the procedural rights afforded by subchapter III of this chapter, any agreement to arbitrate a claim under this chapter is unenforceable, unless all parties consent to arbitration after a complaint on the specific claim has been filed in court or with the Merit Systems Protection Board and all parties knowingly and voluntarily consent to have that particular claim subjected to arbitration.
“(2) For purposes of this subsection, consent shall not be considered voluntary when a person is required to agree to arbitrate an action, complaint, or claim alleging a violation of this chapter as a condition of future or continued employment, advancement in employment, or receipt of any right or benefit of employment.”.
Section 305(i) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3955) is amended—
Section 534(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 10 U.S.C. 1044e note) is amended by—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2):
“(2) RECORD OF CONSULTATION AND VICTIM PREFERENCE.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall issue guidance to ensure that the consultation under paragraph (1) is provided to each victim of an alleged sex-related offense described in such paragraph. Such guidance shall require that the following information about each consultation is recorded and preserved in written or electronic format:
Section 546 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended—
(1) by amending paragraph (2) of subsection (c) to read as follows:
“(2) BASIS FOR PROVISION OF ADVICE.—For purposes of providing advice to the Secretary pursuant to this subsection, the Advisory Committee shall—
“(A) review, on an ongoing basis, cases involving allegations of sexual misconduct described in paragraph (1);
“(B) study the feasibility of incorporating restorative justice models into the Uniform Code of Military Justice; and
“(C) review Rule for Courts-Martial 1001(c) (as set forth in the Manual for Courts-Martial, 2019 edition, or any successor rule) to determine whether, and to what extent, the interpretation of that rule by military courts—
(a) Establishment required.—
(b) Membership.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Advisory Committee shall consist of not more than 20 members, appointed by the Secretary from among individuals who have an expertise appropriate for the work of the Advisory Committee, including at least one individual with each expertise as follows:
(c) Duties.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Advisory Committee shall advise the Secretary on the following:
(2) BASIS FOR PROVISION OF ADVICE.—For purposes of providing advice to the Secretary pursuant to this subsection, the Advisory Committee shall review, on an ongoing basis, the following:
(3) COORDINATION OF EFFORTS.—In addition to the reviews required by paragraph (2), for purposes of providing advice to the Secretary the Advisory Committee shall also consult and coordinate with the Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces (DAC-IPAD) on matters of joint interest to the two Advisory Committees.
(d) Annual report.—Not later than March 30 each year, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Secretary and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the activities of the Advisory Committee pursuant to this section during the preceding year.
(e) Sexual assault continuum of harm.—In this section, the term “sexual assault continuum of harm” includes—
(f) Termination.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Advisory Committee shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the establishment of the Advisory Committee pursuant to subsection (a).
(2) CONTINUATION.—The Secretary of Defense may continue the Advisory Committee after the termination date applicable under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that continuation of the Advisory Committee after that date is advisable and appropriate. If the Secretary determines to continue the Advisory Committee after that date, the Secretary shall notify the Committees on the Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, prescribe in regulations a safe to report policy described in subsection (b) that applies with respect to all members of the Armed Forces (including members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces) and cadets and midshipmen at the military service academies.
(b) Safe to report policy.—The safe to report policy described in this subsection is a policy under which a member of the Armed Forces who is the alleged victim of sexual assault, but who may have committed minor collateral misconduct at or about the time of such sexual assault, or whose minor collateral misconduct is discovered only as a result of the investigation into such sexual assault, may report such sexual assault to proper authorities without fear or receipt of discipline in connection with such minor collateral misconduct absent aggravating circumstances that increase the gravity of the minor collateral misconduct or its impact on good order and discipline.
(c) Minor collateral misconduct.—For purposes of the safe to report policy, minor collateral misconduct shall include any of the following:
(d) Aggravating circumstances.—The regulations under subsection (a) shall specify aggravating circumstances that increase the gravity of minor collateral misconduct or its impact on good order and discipline for purposes of the safe to report policy.
(a) Deadline for availability.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—If an individual specified in paragraph (2) is not available at a military installation for access by a member of the Armed Forces who requests access to such an individual, such an individual shall be made available at such installation for access by such member by not later than 48 hours after such request.
(b) Report on civilian support of SVCs.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the assessment of such Secretary of the feasibility and advisability of establishing and maintaining at each installation under the jurisdiction of such Secretary with a Special Victims’ Counsel one or more civilian positions for the purpose of—
Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, upon a determination not to refer a case of alleged sexual assault for trial by court-martial under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the commander making such determination shall periodically notify the victim of the status of a final determination on further action on such case, whether non-judicial punishment under section 815 of such title (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), other administrative action, or no further action. Such notifications shall continue not less frequently than monthly until such final determination.
(a) Training.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), upon the assignment of a Special Victims' Counsel (including a Victim Legal Counsel of the Navy) to a military installation in the United States, such Counsel shall be provided appropriate training on the law and policies of the State or States in which such military installation is located with respect to the criminal justice matters specified in paragraph (2). The purpose of the training is to assist such Counsel in providing victims of alleged sex-related offenses with information necessary to make an informed decision regarding preference as to the jurisdiction (whether court-martial or State court) in which such offenses will be prosecuted.
(a) In general.—Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after section 2004 the following new section:
Ҥ 2004a. Detail as students at law schools: certain enlisted members
“(a) In general.—The Secretary of each military department may, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, detail enlisted members of the armed forces as students at accredited law schools, located in the United States, for a period of training leading to the degree of bachelor of laws or juris doctor. No more than twenty-five officers from each military department may commence such training in any single fiscal year.
“(b) Eligibility for detail.—To be eligible for detail under subsection (a), a member must be a citizen of the United States and must—
“(c) Selection.—Members detailed for legal training under subsection (a) shall be selected on a competitive basis by the Secretary of the military department concerned, under the regulations required by subsection (a).
“(d) Service and service obligations.— (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), any service obligation incurred by a member under an agreement entered into under subsection (b) shall be in addition to any service obligation incurred by the member under any other provision of law or agreement.
(a) Programs of education required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2015 the following new section:
Ҥ 2015a. Education of members on career readiness and professional development
“(a) Program of education required.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program to provide education on career readiness and professional development to members of the armed forces.
“(b) Elements.—The program under this section shall provide members with the following:
“(2) Information on opportunities available to members during military service for professional development and preparation for a career after military service, including—
“(c) Timing of provision of information.—Subject to subsection (d), information, instruction, and other matters under the program under this section shall be provided to members at the times as follows:
“(d) Single provision of information in a year with multiple events.—A member who has received information and instruction under the program under this section in connection with an event specified in subsection (c) in a year may elect not to undergo additional receipt of information and instruction under the program in connection with another such event in the year, unless such other event is arrival at a new duty station.”.
(b) Report on implementation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the program of education required by section 2015a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), including the following:
(a) Authority to award bachelor’s degrees.—Section 2168 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 108 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 2168 and inserting the following new item:
“2168. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center: degree of Associate or Bachelor of Arts in foreign language.”.
(a) In general.—Section 2193b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the section heading, by striking “science, mathematics, and technology” and inserting “science, technology, engineering, art and design, and mathematics”;
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 111 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 2193b and inserting the following new item:
“2193b. Improvement of education in technical fields: program for support of elementary and secondary education in science, technology, engineering, art and design, and mathematics.”.
(a) In general.—Chapter 751 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 7422. Degree granting authority for United States Army Armament Graduate School
“(a) Authority.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, the Chancellor of the United States Army Armament Graduate School may, upon the recommendation of the faculty and provost of the college, confer appropriate degrees upon graduates who meet the degree requirements.
“(b) Limitation.—A degree may not be conferred under this section unless—
“(c) Congressional notification requirements.— (1) When seeking to establish degree granting authority under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives—
“(A) a copy of the self-assessment questionnaire required by the Federal Policy Governing Granting of Academic Degrees by Federal Agencies, at the time the assessment is submitted to the Department of Education’s National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity; and
“(B) the subsequent recommendations and rationale of the Secretary of Education regarding the establishment of the degree granting authority.
“(2) Upon any modification or redesignation of existing degree granting authority, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing the rationale for the proposed modification or redesignation and any subsequent recommendation of the Secretary of Education on the proposed modification or redesignation.
“(3) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report containing an explanation of any action by the appropriate academic accrediting agency or organization not to accredit the United States Army Armament Graduate School to award any new or existing degree.”.
Section 7442 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(a) Military academy.—Section 7461 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Consideration of application for transfer for a cadet who is the victim of a sexual assault or related offense.— (1) The Secretary of the Army shall provide for timely determination and action on an application for consideration of a transfer to another military service academy submitted by a cadet who was a victim of a sexual assault or other offense covered by section 920, 920a, or 920c of this title (article 120, 120a, or 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) so as to reduce the possibility of retaliation against the cadet for reporting the sexual assault or other offense.
“(2) The Secretary of the Army shall prescribe regulations to carry out this subsection, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense that direct the Superintendent of the Military Academy, in coordination with the Superintendent of the military service academy to which the cadet wishes to transfer—
“(3) If the Superintendent of the Military Academy or the Superintendent of the military service academy to which the cadet wishes to transfer denies an application under this subsection, the cadet may request review of the denial by the Secretary concerned, who shall grant or deny review not later than 72 hours after submission of the request for review.
(b) Naval academy.—Section 8480 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Consideration of application for transfer for a midshipman who is the victim of a sexual assault or related offense.— (1) The Secretary of the Navy shall provide for timely determination and action on an application for consideration of a transfer to another military service academy submitted by a midshipman who was a victim of a sexual assault or other offense covered by section 920, 920a, or 920c of this title (article 120, 120a, or 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) so as to reduce the possibility of retaliation against the midshipman for reporting the sexual assault or other offense.
“(2) The Secretary of the Navy shall prescribe regulations to carry out this subsection, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense that direct the Superintendent of the Naval Academy, in coordination with the Superintendent of the military service academy to which the midshipman wishes to transfer—
“(3) If the Superintendent of the Naval Academy or the Superintendent of the military service academy to which the midshipman wishes to transfer denies an application under this subsection, the midshipman may request review of the denial by the Secretary concerned, who shall grant or deny review not later than 72 hours after submission of the request for review.
“(4) The Secretary concerned shall ensure that all records of any request, determination, or action under this subsection remain confidential.
“(5) A midshipman who transfers under this subsection may retain the midshipman’s appointment to the Naval Academy or may be appointed to the military service academy to which the midshipman transfers without regard to the limitations and requirements set forth in sections 7442, 8454, and 9442 of this title.”.
(c) Air force academy.—Section 9461 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Consideration of application for transfer for a cadet who is the victim of a sexual assault or related offense.— (1) The Secretary of the Air Force shall provide for timely determination and action on an application for consideration of a transfer to another military service academy submitted by a cadet who was a victim of a sexual assault or other offense covered by section 920, 920a, or 920c of this title (article 120, 120a, or 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) so as to reduce the possibility of retaliation against the cadet for reporting the sexual assault or other offense.
“(2) The Secretary of the Air Force shall prescribe regulations to carry out this subsection, within guidelines provided by the Secretary of Defense that direct the Superintendent of the Air Force Academy, in coordination with the Superintendent of the military service academy to which the cadet wishes to transfer—
“(3) If the Superintendent of the Air Force Academy or the Superintendent of the military service academy to which the cadet wishes to transfer denies an application under this subsection, the cadet may request review of the denial by the Secretary concerned, who shall grant or deny review not later than 72 hours after submission of the request for review.
“(4) The Secretary concerned shall ensure that all records of any request, determination, or action under this subsection remain confidential.
“(5) A cadet who transfers under this subsection may retain the cadet’s appointment to the Air Force Academy or may be appointed to the military service academy to which the cadet transfers without regard to the limitations and requirements set forth in sections 7442, 8454, and 9442 of this title.”.
(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 9414 of such title is amended by striking “Commandant” both places it appears and inserting “Director and Chancellor”.
(c) References.—Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Commandant of the United States Air Force Institute of Technology shall be deemed to be a reference to the Director and Chancellor of the United States Air Force Institute of Technology.
Section 9415(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall prescribe in regulations a safe-to-report policy described in subsection (b) that applies with respect to cadets and midshipmen at the military service academies.
(b) Safe-to-report policy.—The safe-to-report policy described in this subsection is a policy under which a cadet or midshipman at a military service academy who is the alleged victim of sexual assault, but who may have committed minor collateral misconduct at or about the time of such sexual assault, or whose minor collateral misconduct is discovered only as a result of the investigation into such sexual assault, may report such sexual assault to proper authorities without fear or receipt of discipline in connection with such minor collateral misconduct.
Not later than September 30, 2020, each Secretary of a military department shall prescribe regulations by which the Superintendent of a military service academy under the jurisdiction of the Secretary shall, pursuant to section 303a(e) of title 37, United States Code, recoup the cost of advanced education received by a cadet or midshipman who is separated from that military service academy—
(a) Parris Island.—
Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of the Navy, in coordination with the Navy Medical Department, shall—
(a) Assessment.—The Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall conduct an assessment of the deaths of recruits at facilities under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy, and the effectiveness of the current medical protocols on the training bases.
(b) Report.—Not later than September 30, 2020, the Inspector General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representative a report containing the results of the assessment conducted under subsection (a). The report shall include the following:
(1) The number of recruits who died during basic training in the five years preceding the date of the report.
(4) Whether any of the deaths identified under paragraph (1) were found to be a result of medical negligence.
(6) A description of medical resources accessible to the recruits at the company level at each facility.
(9) An evaluation of how supervisors evaluate and determine whether a sick recruit should continue training or further seek medical assistance.
(a) Modification required.—The Secretary of Defense shall modify the Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to include a specific block explicitly identified as the location in which a member of the Armed Forces may provide one or more email addresses by which the member may be contacted after discharge or release from active duty in the Armed Forces.
(a) Modification required.—The Secretary of Defense shall modify the Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to be machine readable and electronically transferable.
(b) Deadline for modification.—The Secretary of Defense shall release a revised Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), modified pursuant to subsection (a), not later than four years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to Congress regarding the following:
(1) What systems of the Department of Defense require an individual to manually enter information from DD Form 214.
(2) What activities of the Department of Defense require a veteran or former member of the Armed Forces to provide a physical copy of DD Form 214.
(a) Establishment.—Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall establish and implement a standard record of service for members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces, similar to DD Form 214, that summarizes the record of service of each such member, including dates of active duty service.
(b) Coordination.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense shall coordinate with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that the record established under this section is acceptable as proof of service for former members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who are eligible for benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive such benefits.
Section 701(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (5).
Section 701 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(a) Authority.—Section 1482(a)(8) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(8) (A) Transportation of the remains, and travel and transportation allowances as specified in regulations prescribed under section 464 of title 37 for an escort of one person, to the place, subject to subparagraph (B), selected by the person designated to direct disposition of the remains or, if such a selection is not made, to a national or other cemetery which is selected by the Secretary and in which burial of the decedent is authorized.
“(B) The person designated to direct disposition of the remains may select two places under subparagraph (A) if the second place is a national cemetery. If that person selects two places, the Secretary concerned may pay for transportation to the second place only by means of reimbursement under to subsection (b).
“(C) When transportation of the remains includes transportation by aircraft under section 562 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 1482 note), the Secretary concerned shall provide, to the maximum extent practicable, for delivery of the remains by air to the commercial, general aviation, or military airport nearest to the place selected by the designee.”.
(b) Military escort and honor guard only to first location.—Section 562(b) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 1482 note) is amended by adding at the end the following: “If the person designated to direct disposition of the remains selects two places under such section, the term means only the first of those two places.”.
Section 3319(j) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) Establishment and operation of program.—Section 102(h) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (52 U.S.C. 20302(h)) is amended to read as follows:
“(h) Absentee ballot tracking program.—
“(1) REQUIRING ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF PROGRAM.—The chief State election official, in coordination with local election jurisdictions, shall establish and operate an absentee ballot tracking program described in paragraph (2) for the use of absent uniformed services voters and overseas voters.
“(2) PROGRAM DESCRIBED.—
“(A) INFORMATION ON TRANSMISSION AND RECEIPT OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS.—An absentee ballot tracking program described in this paragraph is a program under which—
“(i) the State or local election official responsible for the transmission of absentee ballots in an election for Federal office operates procedures to track and confirm the transmission of such ballots and to make information on the transmission of such a ballot available by means of online access using the internet site of the official’s office; and
“(ii) the State or local election official responsible for the receipt of absentee ballots in an election for Federal office operates procedures to track and confirm the receipt of such ballots and (subject to subparagraph (B)) to make information on the receipt of such a ballot available by means of online access using the internet site of the official’s office.
“(B) SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON RECEIPT OF VOTED ABSENTEE BALLOTS.—The information required to be made available under clause (ii) of subparagraph (A) with respect to the receipt of a voted absentee ballot in an election for Federal office shall include information regarding whether the vote cast on the ballot was counted, and, in the case of a vote which was not counted, the reasons therefor. The appropriate State or local election official shall make the information described in the previous sentence available during the 30-day period that begins on the date on which the results of the election are certified, or during such earlier 30-day period as the official may provide.
“(3) USE OF TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER BY OFFICIALS WITHOUT INTERNET SITE.—A program established and operated by a State or local election official whose office does not have an internet site may meet the requirements of paragraph (2) if the official has established and operates a toll-free telephone number that may be used to obtain the information on the transmission or receipt of the absentee ballot which is required under such paragraph.”.
Section 1111(h)(1)(C)(ii) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(h)(1)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking “on active duty (as defined in section 101(d)(5) of such title)”.
(a) Transportation for remains of a member who dies not in a theater of combat operations.—Section 562 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 1482 note) is amended—
(b) Transportation for family.—The Secretary of Defense shall revise Department of Defense Instruction 1300.18 to extend travel privileges via Invitational Travel Authorization to family members of members of the Armed Forces who die outside of the United States and whose remains are returned to the United States through the mortuary facility at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware.
(a) Chiefs of the Armed Forces.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct the chiefs of the Armed Forces to meet periodically with survivors of deceased members of the Armed Forces to receive feedback from those survivors regarding issues affecting such survivors. The Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall meet with survivors of deceased members of the Air National Guard and the Army National Guard.
(b) Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall meet periodically with survivors of deceased members of the Armed Forces to discuss policies of the Department of Defense regarding military casualties and Gold Star families.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services directly to the following:
(b) Administration.—The pilot program shall be offered to, and administered by, the adjutants general appointed under section 314 of title 32, United States Code, or other officials in the States concerned designated by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program.
(c) Cost-Sharing requirement.—As a condition on the provision of funds under this section to a State to support the operation of the pilot program in the State, the State must agree to contribute an amount, derived from non-Federal sources, equal to at least 50 percent of the funds provided by the Secretary to the State under this section.
(d) Direct employment program model.—The pilot program should follow a job placement program model that focuses on working one-on-one with individuals specified in subsection (a) to cost-effectively provide job placement services, including services such as identifying unemployed and underemployed individuals, job matching services, resume editing, interview preparation, and post-employment follow up. Development of the pilot program should be informed by existing State direct employment programs for members of the reserve components and veterans.
(e) Training.—The pilot program should draw on the resources provided to transitioning members of the Armed Forces with civilian training opportunities through the SkillBridge trainsition training program administered by the Department of Defense.
(f) Evaluation.—The Secretary shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the success of the pilot program.
(g) Reporting requirements.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the results of the pilot program. The Secretary shall prepare the report in coordination with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—A report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description and assessment of the effectiveness and achievements of the pilot program, including the number of members of the reserve components and veterans of the Armed Forces hired and the cost-per-placement of participating members and veterans.
(B) An assessment of the impact of the pilot program and increased reserve component employment levels on the readiness of members of the reserve components and on the retention of members of the Armed Forces.
(C) A comparison of the pilot program to other programs conducted by the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs to provide unemployment and underemployment support to members of the reserve components and veterans of the Armed Forces, including the best practices developed through and used in such programs.
(a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 in Division D of this Act and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in Section 4301 of this Act, $40,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b) Impact aid for children with severe disabilities.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 in Division D of this Act and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in Section 4301 of this Act, $10,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106–398; 20 U.S.C. 7703a).
(c) Local educational agency defined.—In this section, the term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 7013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).
(a) Service medal required.—The Secretary of Defense shall design and produce a military service medal, to be known as the “Atomic Veterans Service Medal”, to honor retired and former members of the Armed Forces who are radiation-exposed veterans (as such term is defined in section 1112(c)(3) of title 38, United States Code).
(b) Distribution of medal.—
(1) ISSUANCE TO RETIRED AND FORMER MEMBERS.—At the request of a radiation-exposed veteran, the Secretary of Defense shall issue the Atomic Veterans Service Medal to the veteran.
(a) Review required.—Each Secretary concerned shall review the service records of each World War I veteran described in subsection (b) under the jurisdiction of such Secretary who is recommended for such review by the Valor Medals Review Task Force referred to in subsection (c), or another veterans service organization, in order to determine whether such veteran should be awarded the Medal of Honor for valor during World War I.
(b) Covered World War I veterans.—The World War I veterans whose service records are to be reviewed under subsection (a) are the following:
(1) Any African American war veteran, Asian American war veteran, Hispanic American war veteran, Jewish American war veteran, or Native American war veteran who was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross or the Navy Cross for an action that occurred between April 6, 1917, and November 11, 1918.
(2) Any African American war veteran, Asian American war veteran, Hispanic American war veteran, Jewish American war veteran, or Native American war veteran who was awarded the Croix de Guerre with Palm (that is, awarded at the Army level or above) by the Government of France for an action that occurred between April 6, 1917, and November 11, 1918.
(3) Any African American war veteran, Asian American war veteran, Hispanic American war veteran, Jewish American war veteran, or Native American war veteran who was recommended for a Medal of Honor for an action that occurred from April 6, 1917, to November 11, 1918, if the Department of Defense possesses or receives records relating to such recommendation.
(c) Consultations.—In carrying out the review under subsection (a), each Secretary concerned may consult with the Valor Medals Review Task Force, jointly established by the United States Foundation for the Commemoration of the World Wars (in consultation with the United States World War One Centennial Commission) and the George S. Robb Centre for the Study of the Great War, and with such other veterans service organizations as such Secretary determines appropriate, until the conclusion of the review.
(d) Recommendation based on review.—If a Secretary concerned determines, based upon the review under subsection (a), that the award of the Medal of Honor to a covered World War I veteran is warranted, such Secretary shall submit to the President a recommendation that the President award the Medal of Honor to that veteran.
(e) Authority to award Medal of Honor.—The Medal of Honor may be awarded to a World War I veteran in accordance with a recommendation of a Secretary concerned under subsection (d).
(f) Waiver of time limitations.—An award of the Medal of Honor may be made under subsection (e) without regard to—
(g) Definitions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In this section:
(A) AFRICAN AMERICAN WAR VETERAN.—The term “African American war veteran” means any person who served in the United States Armed Forces between April 6, 1917, and November 11, 1918, and who identified himself as of African descent on his military personnel records.
(B) ASIAN AMERICAN WAR VETERAN.—The term “Asian American war veteran” means any person who served in the United States Armed Forces between April 6, 1917, and November 11, 1918, and who identified himself racially, nationally, or ethnically as originating from a country in Asia on his military personnel records.
(C) HISPANIC AMERICAN WAR VETERAN.—The term “Hispanic American war veteran” means any person who served in the United States Armed Forces between April 6, 1917, and November 11, 1918, and who identified himself racially, nationally, or ethnically as originating from a country where Spanish is an official language on his military personnel records.
(D) JEWISH AMERICAN WAR VETERAN.—The term “Jewish American war veteran” mean any person who served in the United States Armed Forces between April 6, 1917, and November 11, 1918, and who identified himself as Jewish on his military personnel records.
(E) NATIVE AMERICAN WAR VETERAN.—The term “Native American war veteran” means any person who served in the United States Armed Forces between April 6, 1917, and November 11, 1918, and who identified himself as a member of a federally recognized tribe within the modern territory of the United States on his military personnel records.
(2) APPLICATION OF DEFINITIONS OF ORIGIN.—If the military personnel records of a person do not reflect the person’s membership in one of the groups identified in subparagraphs (B) through (F) of paragraph (1) but historical evidence exists that demonstrates the person’s Jewish faith held at the time of service, or that the person identified himself as of African, Asian, Hispanic, or Native American descent, the person may be treated as being a member of the applicable group by the Secretary concerned (in consultation with the organizations referred to in subsection (c)) for purposes of this section.
Section 115(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (3).
(a) Surveys of members of the Armed Forces.—Section 481(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting “unwanted sexual contact,” after “assault,”;
(b) Surveys of civilian employees of the Department of Defense.—Section 481a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking “and discrimination” and inserting “discrimination, and unwanted sexual contact”;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(B) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):
“(3) The specific types of unwanted sexual contact that civilian employees of the Department were subjected to by other personnel of the Department (including contractor personnel), and the number of times each respondent has been subjected to unwanted sexual contact during the preceding fiscal year.”;
Section 552(b)(4) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) is amended—
(2) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated by paragraph (1), the following new subparagraph (A):
The Secretary of Defense shall include, in the workplace and equal opportunity, command climate, and workplace and gender relations surveys administered by the Office of People Analytics of the Department of Defense, questions regarding whether respondents have ever—
(a) Inclusion of support for participation in programs in command climate assessments.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each command climate assessment for the commander of a military installation shall include an assessment of the extent to which the commander and other command personnel at the installation encourage and support the participation in covered transition assistance programs of members of the Armed Forces at the installation who are eligible for participation in such programs.
(b) Training on programs.—The training provided a commander of a military installation in connection with the commencement of assignment to the installation shall include a module on the covered transition assistance programs available for members of the Armed Forces assigned to the installation.
(c) Covered transition assistance programs defined.—In this section, the term “covered transition assistance programs” means the following:
(2) The programs under section 1143(e) of title 10, United States Code (commonly referred to as “Job Training, Employment Skills, Apprenticeships and Internships (JTEST–AI)” or “Skill Bridge”).
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) March 2, 2020, marked the 91st anniversary of President Calvin Coolidge signing an Act of Congress that approved and funded the first Gold Star pilgrimage to enable Gold Star families to travel to the gravesites of their loved ones who died during World War I.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress to—
(2) honor and recognize the sacrifices made by the families of members of the Armed Forces of the United States who gave their lives to defend freedom and protect America; and
Section 372(b)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) In general.—Chapter 7 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 402a the following new section:
“(a) Allowance required.— (1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall pay to each covered member a basic needs allowance in the amount determined for such member under subsection (b).
“(b) Amount of allowance for a covered member.—
(1) The amount of the monthly allowance payable to a covered member under subsection (a) for a year shall be the aggregate amount equal to—
“(c) Notice of eligibility.— (1) (A) Not later than December 31 each year, the Director of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service shall notify, in writing, each individual whom the Director estimates will be a covered member during the following year of the potential entitlement of that individual to the allowance described in subsection (a) for that following year.
“(B) The preliminary notice under subparagraph (A) shall include information regarding financial management and assistance programs administered by the Secretary of Defense for which a covered member is eligible.
“(2) Not later than January 31 each year, each individual who seeks to receive the allowance for such year (whether or not subject to a notice for such year under paragraph (1)) shall submit to the Director such information as the Director shall require for purposes of this section in order to determine whether or not such individual is a covered member for such year.
“(d) Election not To receive allowance.— (1) A covered member otherwise entitled to receive the allowance under subsection (a) for a year may elect, in writing, not to receive the allowance for such year. Any election under this subsection shall be effective only for the year for which made. Any election for a year under this subsection is irrevocable.
“(e) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘covered member’ means a regular member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, or Air Force—
“(2) The term ‘gross household income’ of a covered member for a year for purposes of paragraph (1)(B) does not include any basic allowance for housing received by the covered member (and any dependents of the covered member in the household of the covered member) during such year under section 403 of this title.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 402a the following new item:
“402b. Basic needs allowance for low-income regular members.”.
Section 403(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(8) (A) The Secretary of Defense may prescribe a temporary increase in the current rates of basic allowance for housing for a military housing area or a portion thereof (in this paragraph, ‘BAH rates’) if the Secretary determines that the actual costs of adequate housing for civilians in that military housing area or portion thereof exceed the current BAH rates by more than 20 percent.
Section 403(o) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) (A) In the case of a member described in subparagraph (B), the member may be treated for the purposes of this section as if the unit to which the member is assigned did not undergo a change of home port or a change of permanent duty station if the Secretary concerned determines that it would be inequitable to base the member’s entitlement to, and amount of, a basic allowance for housing on the new home port or permanent duty station.
(a) Current authority.—Section 477(f)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “family”.
(b) Future authority.—Section 452(c) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):
“(3) (A) A partial dislocation allowance paid to a member ordered to occupy or vacate housing provided by the United States.
“(B) Beginning on January 1, 2022, the partial dislocation allowance under subparagraph (A) shall, subject to subparagraph (C), be equal in value to the allowance under section 477(f) of this title on December 31, 2021, as adjusted in regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned under the authority established by that section.
“(C) Effective on the same date in 2022 and any subsequent year that the monthly rates of basic pay for all members are increased under section 1009 of this title or another provision of law, the Secretary of Defense shall adjust the rate of the partial dislocation allowance under this paragraph by the percentage equal to the average percentage increase in the rates of basic pay.”.
(a) Authorities relating to reserve forces.—Section 910(g) of title 37, United States Code, relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service, is amended by striking “December 31, 2019” and inserting “December 31, 2020”.
(b) Title 10 authorities relating to health care professionals.—The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2019” and inserting “December 31, 2020”:
(c) Authorities relating to nuclear officers.—Section 333(i) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2019” and inserting “December 31, 2020”.
(d) Authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities.—The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2019” and inserting “December 31, 2020”:
(4) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.
Section 1059(m) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
“(3) For the purposes of this subsection, a member is considered separated from active duty upon the earliest of—
Section 1784a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) A spouse who is eligible for a program under this section and begins a course of education or training for a degree, license, or credential described in subsection (a) may not become ineligible to complete such course of education or training solely because the member to whom the spouse is married is promoted to a higher grade.”.
(a) Improvement of occupational license portability for military spouses through interstate compacts.—Section 1784 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(h) Improvement of occupational license portability through interstate compacts.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into a cooperative agreement with the Council of State Governments to assist with funding of the development of interstate compacts on licensed occupations in order to alleviate the burden associated with relicensing in such an occupation by spouse of a members of the armed forces in connection with a permanent change of duty station of members to another State.
“(2) LIMITATION.—The amount provided under paragraph (1) as assistance for the development of any particular interstate compact may not exceed $1,000,000.
“(3) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than February 28 each year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on interstate compacts described in paragraph (1) developed through assistance provided under that paragraph. Each report shall set forth the following:
(b) Guarantee of residency for registration of businesses of spouses of members of uniformed services.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Title VI of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 4021 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“SEC. 707. Guarantee of residency for businesses of spouses of servicemembers.
“For the purposes of registering a business—
“(1) a person who is absent from a State because the person is accompanying the person's spouse who is absent from that same State in compliance with military or naval orders shall not, solely by reason of that absence—
Section 1798(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, survivors of members of the armed forces who die in line of duty while on active duty, active duty for training, or inactive duty for training,” after “armed forces”.
Section 2641b(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 12731(f)(2)(B)(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “under a provision of law referred to in section 101(a)(13)(B) or under section 12301(d)” and inserting “under section 12301(d) or 12304b of this title, or under a provision of law referred to in section 101(a)(13)(B)”.
Section 476(p) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Expansion of authority to provide financial assistance to civilian providers of child care services or youth program services who provide such services to survivors of members of the armed forces who die in the line of duty.—Section 1798(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, survivors of members of the armed forces who die in the line of duty while on active military, naval, or air service (as that term is defined in section 101 of title 38),” after “armed forces”.
(b) Expansion of direct hiring authority for child care service providers.—Section 559 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 1792 note) is amended—
(c) Assessment of financial assistance provided to civilian child care providers.—
(1) ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall assess the maximum amount of financial assistance provided to eligible civilian providers of child care services or youth program services that furnish such service for members of the armed forces and employees of the United States under section 1798 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a). Such assessment shall include the following:
(2) REPORT.—No later than June 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives regarding the results of the assessment under paragraph (1) and any actions taken by the Secretary to remedy identified shortfalls in assistance described in that paragraph.
(d) Assessment of child care capacity on military installations.—
(1) ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall assess the capacity for child care at all military installations to ensure that members of the Armed Forces have meaningful access to child care during tours of duty.
(2) REMEDIAL ACTION.—The Secretary of Defense shall take steps the Secretary determines necessary to alleviate the waiting lists for child care described in paragraph (1).
(e) Assessment of accessibility of websites of the Department of Defense related to child care and spousal employment.—
(1) ASSESSMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall review the functions and accessibility of websites of the Department of Defense designed for members of the Armed Forces and the families of such members to access information and services offered by the Department regarding child care, spousal employment, and other family matters.
(f) Portability of background investigations for child care providers.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the background investigation and training certification for a child care provider employed by the Department of Defense in a facility of the Department may be transferred to another facility of the Department, without regard to which Secretary of a military department has jurisdiction over either such facility.
Section 633 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (10 U.S.C. 1475 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(a) Review.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of the business case analysis performed as part of the defense resale optimization study conducted by the Reform Management Group, titled “Study to Determine the Feasibility of Consolidation of the Defense Resale Entities” and dated December 4, 2018.
(b) Report required; elements.—Not later than April 1, 2020, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report regarding the review performed under this section. The report shall include evaluations of the following:
(1) The descriptions and justifications for the assumptions, analytical choices and data used by the Reform Management Group to calculate:
(3) The recommendations for consolidation developed as part of the business case analysis, including the overall cost of consolidation.
(4) The budget and oversight implications of merging non-appropriated funds and appropriated funds to implement the recommended reforms.
(5) The extent to which the Reform Management Group coordinated with the Secretaries of the military departments and the chiefs of the Armed Forces in preparing the study.
(c) Delay on consolidation.—The Secretary of Defense may not take any action to consolidate military exchanges and commissaries until the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives notify the Secretary in writing of receipt and acceptance of the findings of the Comptroller General in the report required under this section.
(a) In general.—Section 1074d of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections:
“(b) Care related to prevention of pregnancy.—Female covered beneficiaries shall be entitled to care related to the prevention of pregnancy described by subsection (d)(3).
“(c) Prohibition on cost sharing for certain services.—Notwithstanding section 1074g(a)(6), section 1075, or section 1075a of this title, or any other provision of law, cost sharing may not be imposed or collected for care related to the prevention of pregnancy provided pursuant to subsection (a) or (b), including for any method of contraception provided, whether provided through a facility of the uniformed services, the TRICARE retail pharmacy program, or the national mail-order pharmacy program.”.
(a) In general.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074o the following new section:
Ҥ 1074p. Provision of pregnancy prevention assistance at military medical treatment facilities
“(a) Information and assistance.—The Secretary of Defense shall promptly furnish to sexual assault survivors at each military medical treatment facility the following:
“(1) Comprehensive, medically and factually accurate, and unbiased written and oral information about all methods of emergency contraception approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
“(b) Information.—The Secretary shall ensure that information provided pursuant to subsection (a) is provided in language that—
Section 1076d(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Paragraph (1) does not apply” and inserting “During the period preceding January 1, 2030, paragraph (1) does not apply”.
(a) TRICARE.—
(1) WELL-BABY CARE.—Section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(i) (1) Beginning January 1, 2020, in furnishing well-baby care under subsection (a)(8), the Secretary shall ensure that the following care is made available:
“(A) With respect to a child who lives in housing built before 1978 at any time during the first 24 months of the life of the child—
“(B) With respect to a child not covered by subparagraph (A) whose parent or guardian, at any time during the first 24 months of the life of the child, has a military occupational specialty that the Secretary determines poses an elevated risk of lead exposure—
“(C) With respect to a child not covered by subparagraph (A) or (B)—
“(D) With respect to a child covered by subparagraph (C) whose screening indicates an elevated risk of lead exposure, testing of the child for the level of lead in the blood of the child.
“(2) The Secretary shall ensure that any care provided to a child pursuant to this chapter for lead poisoning, including the care under paragraph (1), is carried out in accordance with applicable advice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“(3) (A) With respect to a child who receives a test under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide the results of the test to the parent or guardian of the child.
“(B) With respect to a child who receives a test under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide the results of the test and the address at which the child resides to—
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a)(8) of such section is amended by striking “including well-baby care that includes one screening of an infant for the level of lead in the blood of the infant” and inserting “including, in accordance with subsection (i), well-baby care that includes screenings and testings for lead exposure and lead poisoning”.
(3) STUDY.—Not later than January 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the following:
(A) The number of children who were tested for the level of lead in the blood of the child pursuant to subparagraph (A) of subsection (i)(1) of section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), and of such number, the number who were found to have elevated blood lead levels.
(B) The number of children who were tested for the level of lead in the blood of the child pursuant to subparagraph (B) of such subsection (i)(1), and of such number, the number who were found to have lead poisoning.
(C) The number of children who were screened for an elevated risk of lead exposure pursuant to subparagraph (C) of such subsection (i)(1).
(D) The number of children who were tested for the level of lead in the blood of the child pursuant to subparagraph (D) of such subsection, and of such number, the number who were found to have elevated blood lead levels.
(E) The treatment provided to children pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, for lead poisoning.
(4) GAO REPORT.—Not later than January 1, 2022, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the effectiveness of screening, testing, and treating children for lead exposure and lead poisoning pursuant to chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Notification of housing.—Section 403 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(a) Periodic health assessment.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that any periodic health assessment provided to members of the Armed Forces includes an evaluation of whether the member has been—
(b) Separation history and physical examinations.—Section 1145(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(C) The Secretary concerned shall ensure that each physical examination of a member under subparagraph (A) includes an assessment of whether the member was—
“(i) based or stationed at a location where an open burn pit, as defined in subsection (c) of section 201 of the Dignified Burial and Other Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 527 note), was used; or
(c) Deployment assessments.—Section 1074f(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(D) An assessment of whether the member was—
“(i) based or stationed at a location where an open burn pit, as defined in subsection (c) of section 201 of the Dignified Burial and Other Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 527 note), was used; or
(d) Sharing of information.—
(1) DOD–VA.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall jointly enter into a memorandum of understanding providing for the sharing by the Department of Defense with the Department of Veterans Affairs of the results of covered evaluations regarding the exposure by a member of the Armed Forces to toxic airborne chemicals or other airborne contaminants.
(2) REGISTRY.—If a covered evaluation of a member of the Armed Forces establishes that the member was based or stationed at a location where an open burn pit was used or that the member was exposed to toxic airborne chemicals or other airborne contaminants, the member shall be enrolled in the Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry unless the member elects to not so enroll.
(e) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section may be construed to preclude eligibility for benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs by reason of the open burn pit exposure history of a veteran not being recorded in a covered evaluation.
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry” means the registry established by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under section 201 of the Dignified Burial and Other Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 527 note).
(2) The term “covered evaluation” means—
(3) The term “open burn pit” has the meaning given that term in section 201(c) of the Dignified Burial and Other Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 527 note).
(a) Recording of occupational and environmental health risks in deployment area.—
(1) ELEMENTS OF MEDICAL TRACKING SYSTEM.—Subsection (b)(1)(A) of section 1074f of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Integration of burn pit registry information into electronic health records.—
(1) UPDATES TO ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS.—Beginning not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act—
(2) BURN PIT REGISTRY DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “burn pit registry” means the registry established under section 201 of the Dignified Burial and Other Veterans’ Improvements Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 527 note).
(c) Postdeployment medical examination and reassessments.—
(1) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.—Section 1074f of title 10, United States Code is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(g) Additional requirements for postdeployment medical examinations and health reassessments.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall—
“(A) standardize and make available to a provider that conducts a postdeployment medical examination or reassessment under the system described in subsection (a) questions relating to occupational and environmental health exposure; and
“(B) prior to an examination or reassessment of a member of the armed forces, require such provider to review information applicable to such member—
“(2) The Secretary shall ensure that the medical record of a member includes information on the external cause relating to a diagnosis of the member, including by associating an external cause code (as issued under the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (or any successor revision)).”.
(d) Report by Comptroller General of the United States.—Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report containing an evaluation of the implementation of this section (and the amendments made by this section), including an assessment of the extent to which the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Veterans Affairs are in compliance with the applicable requirements of this section (and the amendments made by this section).
(a) Required assessments.—Section 1074m(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:
“(C) Subject to paragraph (3) and subsection (d), once during the period beginning on the date of redeployment from the contingency operation and ending 14 days after such redeployment date.
(b) Exceptions.—Section 1074m(a) of such title, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs:
“(2) A mental health assessment is not required for a member of the armed forces under subparagraphs (C) and (D) of paragraph (1) (including an assessment performed pursuant to paragraph (3)) if the Secretary determines that providing such assessment to the member during the time periods under such subparagraphs would remove the member from forward deployment or put members or operational objectives at risk.
“(3) A mental health assessment required under subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) may be provided during the period beginning 90 days after the date of redeployment from the contingency operation and ending 180 days after such redeployment date if the Secretary determines that—
The Secretary of Defense shall include, as part of the annual physical examination provided by the Secretary to each firefighter of the Department of Defense, blood testing to determine and document the potential exposure of such firefighters to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (commonly known as “PFAS”).
(a) Requirement.—Section 1074g of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection (h):
Section 7081(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Dental Corps Officer” and inserting “commissioned officer of the Army Medical Department”.
Subsection (c) of section 1635 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended to read as follows:
“(c) Leadership.—
“(2) DEPUTY DIRECTOR.—The Deputy Director of the Office shall be the deputy head of the Office and shall assist the Director in carrying out the duties of the Director.
“(3) REPORTING.—The Director shall report to the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee established by section 320 of title 38, United States Code.
“(4) APPOINTMENTS.—
“(A) DIRECTOR.—The Director shall be jointly appointed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense for a five-year term. The Director may be reappointed for one or more additional terms.
“(B) DEPUTY DIRECTOR.—The Deputy Director shall be jointly appointed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense for a five-year term. The Deputy Director may be reappointed for one or more additional terms.
“(C) ADVICE.—The Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee shall provide the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Defense with advice regarding potential individuals to be appointed Director and Deputy Director under subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively.
“(D) MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS.—The Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee shall develop qualification requirements for the office of the Director and the Deputy Director. Such requirements shall ensure that, at a minimum, the Director and Deputy Director, individually or together, meet the following qualifications:
“(5) ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE.—In addition to providing direction, supervision, and control of the Office pursuant to paragraph (3), the Department of Veterans Affairs-Department of Defense Joint Executive Committee shall—
“(6) INFORMATION TO CONGRESS.—Upon request by any of the appropriate committees of Congress, the Director and the Deputy Director shall testify before such committee, or provide a briefing or otherwise provide requested information to such committee, regarding the discharge of the functions of the Office under this section.”.
(a) Requirement.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall document blast exposure history in the medical record of a member of the Armed Forces to—
(b) Elements.—A blast exposure history under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(c) Collection of exposure information.—The Secretary of Defense shall collect blast exposure information with respect to a member of the Armed Forces in a manner—
(1) consistent with blast exposure measurement training guidance of the Department, including any new guidance developed pursuant to—
(A) the study on blast pressure exposure required by section 734 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1444); and
(B) the review of guidance on blast exposure during training required by section 253 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1704, 10 U.S.C. 2001 note);
(a) Policy required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, shall develop and implement a comprehensive policy for the provision of mental health care to members of the Armed Forces.
(b) Elements.—The policy under subsection (a) shall address each of the following:
(1) The compliance of health professionals in the military health system engaged in the provision of health care services to members with clinical practice guidelines for—
(2) The access and availability of mental health care services to members who are victims of sexual assault or domestic violence.
(4) The promotion of referrals of members by civilian health care providers to military medical treatment facilities when such members are—
(5) The provision of comprehensive behavioral health treatment to members of the reserve components that takes into account the unique challenges associated with the deployment pattern of such members and the difficulty such members encounter post-deployment with respect to accessing such treatment in civilian communities.
(c) Consideration.—In developing the policy under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall solicit and consider recommendations from the Secretaries of the military departments and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff regarding the feasibility of implementation and execution of particular elements of the policy.
(a) Limitation.—Except as provided by subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries concerned may not realign or reduce military medical end strength authorizations until—
(b) Reviews, analyses, and other information.—
(1) REVIEW.—Each Secretary concerned, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall conduct a review of the medical manpower requirements of the military department of the Secretary that accounts for all national defense strategy scenarios.
(2) ANALYSES.—With respect to each military medical treatment facility that would be affected by a proposed military medical end strength realignment or reduction, the Secretary concerned shall conduct an analysis that—
(3) MEASUREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall—
(A) develop a standard measurement for network adequacy to determine the capacity of the local health care network to provide care for covered beneficiaries in the area of a military medical treatment facility that would be affected by a proposed military medical end strength realignment or reduction; and
(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the proposed military medical end strength realignments or reductions, including—
(d) Exception.—The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to billets of a medical department of a military department that have remained unfilled since at least October 1, 2018. The Secretary concerned may realign or reduce such a billet if the Secretary determines that such realignment or reduction does not affect the provision of health care services to members of the Armed Forces or covered beneficiaries.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “covered beneficiary” has the meaning given that term in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.
(2) The term “proposed military medical end strength realignment or reduction” means a realignment or reduction of military medical end strength authorizations as proposed by the budget of the President for fiscal year 2020 submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that—
(a) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the practices for prescribing medication during the period beginning January 1, 2012, and ending December 31, 2017, that were inconsistent with the post-traumatic stress disorder medication guidelines developed by the Department of Defense and the Veterans Health Administration.
(2) CONTENTS.—The report under this subsection shall include the following:
(A) A summary of the practices of the Army, Navy, and the Air Force, for prescribing medication during the period referred to in paragraph (1) that were inconsistent with the post-traumatic stress disorder medication guidelines developed by the Department of Defense and the Veterans Health Administration.
(B) Identification of medical centers serving members of the Armed Forces found to having higher than average incidences of prescribing medication during the period referred to in paragraph (1) that were inconsistent with the post-traumatic stress disorder guidelines.
(b) Monitoring program.—Based on the findings of the report under subsection (a), the Secretaries of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force shall each establish a monitoring program carried out with respect to such branch of the Armed Forces that shall provide as follows:
(1) The monitoring program shall provide for the conduct of periodic reviews, beginning October 1, 2019, of medication prescribing practices of its own providers.
(2) The monitoring program shall provide for regular reports, beginning October 1, 2020, to the Department of Defense and the Veterans Health Administration, of the results of the periodic reviews pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection.
(3) The monitoring program shall establish internal procedures, not later than October 1, 2020, to address practices for prescribing medication that are inconsistent with the post-traumatic stress disorder medication guidelines developed by the Department of Defense and the Veterans Health Administration.
(a) In general.—Chapter 104 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2116 the following new section:
“(a) Definitions.—In this section:
“(b) Program authorized.—The Secretary of Defense may establish at the University a program of military dental research.
“(c) TriService research group.—The TriService Dental Research Program shall be administered by a TriService Dental Research Group composed of Army, Navy, and Air Force dentists who are involved in military dental research and are designated by the Secretary concerned to serve as members of the group.
“(d) Duties of group.—The TriService Dental Research Group described in subsection (c) shall—
“(1) develop for the Department of Defense recommended guidelines for requesting, reviewing, and funding proposed military dental research projects; and
“(e) Research topics.—For purposes of this section, military dental research includes research on the following issues:
“(1) Issues regarding how to ensure the readiness of members of the armed forces on active duty and in the reserve components with respect to the provision of dental care and services.
“(2) Issues regarding preventive dentistry and disease management, including early detection of needs.
“(3) Issues regarding how to improve the results of dental care and services provided in the armed forces in time of peace.
“(4) Issues regarding how to improve the results of dental care and services provided in the armed forces in time of war.
“(5) Issues regarding minimizing or eliminating emergent dental conditions and dental disease and non-battle injuries in deployed settings.
“(7) Issues regarding how to prevent complications associated with the transportation of dental patients in the military medical evacuation system.
(a) Pilot program.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program to provide not more than 1,000 members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty with the opportunity to cryopreserve and store their gametes prior to deployment to a combat zone.
(b) Period.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall provide for the cryopreservation and storage of gametes of a participating member of the Armed Forces under subsection (a), at no cost to the member, in a facility of the Department of Defense or at a private entity pursuant to a contract under subsection (d) until the date that is one year after the retirement, separation, or release of the member from the Armed Forces.
(2) CONTINUED CRYOPRESERVATION AND STORAGE.—At the end of the one-year period specified in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall authorize an individual whose gametes were cryopreserved and stored in a facility of the Department as described in that paragraph to select, including pursuant to an advance medical directive or military testamentary instrument completed under subsection (c), one of the following options:
(A) To continue such cryopreservation and storage in such facility with the cost of such cryopreservation and storage borne by the individual.
(c) Advance medical directive and military testamentary instrument.—A member of the Armed Forces who elects to cryopreserve and store their gametes under this section shall complete an advance medical directive described in section 1044c(b) of title 10, United States Code, and a military testamentary instrument described in section 1044d(b) of such title, that explicitly specifies the use of their cryopreserved and stored gametes if such member dies or otherwise loses the capacity to consent to the use of their cryopreserved and stored gametes.
(a) Encouragement of participation.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall encourage female members of the Armed Forces who are separating or retiring from the Armed Forces during fiscal year 2020 to participate in the Women’s Health Transition Training pilot program (in this section referred to as the “pilot program”) administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
(b) Selection.—Each Secretary of a military department shall select at least one location at which the pilot program is offered and encourage participation in the pilot program at such location.
(c) Report.—Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the pilot program that includes the following:
(2) Data relating to—
(3) A discussion of regulatory, legal, or resource barriers to—
(A) making the pilot program permanent to enable access by a greater number of female members at locations throughout the United States;
(a) Pilot program authorized.—The Chief of the National Guard Bureau may carry out a pilot program to expand suicide prevention and intervention efforts at the community level through the use of a mobile application that provides the capability for a member of the National Guard to receive prompt support, including access to a behavioral health professional, on a smartphone, tablet computer, or other handheld mobile device.
(b) Elements.—The pilot program shall include, subject to such conditions as the Secretary may prescribe—
(c) Eligibility and participation requirements.—The Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall establish requirements with respect to eligibility and participation in the pilot program.
(d) Assessment prior to pilot program commencement.—Prior to commencement of the pilot program, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall—
(1) conduct an assessment of existing prevention and intervention efforts of the National Guard in each State that include the use of mobile applications that provide the capability described in subsection (a) to determine best practices for providing immediate and localized care through the use of such mobile applications; and
(e) Responsibilities of entities participating in pilot program.—Each entity that participates in the pilot program shall—
(f) Term.—The pilot program shall terminate on the date that is three years after the date on which the pilot program commenced.
(g) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—If the Chief of the National Guard Bureau commences the pilot program authorized under subsection (a), not later than 180 days after the date of the commencement of such program, the Chief shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing a description of the pilot program and such other matters as the Chief considers appropriate.
(2) FINAL REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the termination of the pilot program, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on such pilot program.
(a) Reports.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on suicide among members of the Armed Forces during the year preceding the date of the report.
(b) Matters included.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following with respect to the year covered by the report:
(1) The number of suicides, attempted suicides, and occurrences of suicidal ideation involving a member of the Armed Forces, including the reserve components thereof, listed by Armed Force.
(2) The number of suicides, attempted suicides, or suicidal ideation identified under paragraph (1) that occurred during each of the following periods:
(3) With respect to the number of suicides, attempted suicides, or suicidal ideation identified under paragraph (2)(A), the initial recruit training location of the member.
(5) A description of any research collaborations and data sharing by the Department of Defense with the Department of Veterans Affairs, other departments or agencies of the Federal Government, academic institutions, or nongovernmental organizations.
(6) Identification of a research agenda for the Department of Defense to improve the evidence base on effective suicide prevention treatment and risk communication.
(7) A description of the effectiveness of the policies developed pursuant to section 567 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) and section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note), including with respect to—
(A) metrics identifying effective treatment modalities for members of the Armed Forces who are at risk for suicide (including any clinical interventions involving early identification and treatment of such members);
(B) metrics for the rate of integration of mental health screenings and suicide risk and prevention for members during the delivery of primary care for such members;
(a) Study.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on the use of local integrated military-civilian integrated health delivery systems pursuant to section 706 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 1096 note). The study shall examine the following:
(1) Geographic locations where military medical treatment facilities have existing contractual relationships with local civilian health care networks, including Fort Drum, New York, Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, Joint Base Lewis-McCord, Washington, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska, Fort Sill, Oklahoma, Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, the National Capital Region, and similar locations.
(2) Health care activities that promote value-based care, measurable health outcomes, patient safety, timeliness of referrals, and transparent communication with covered beneficiaries.
(a) Study.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on the effectiveness of case management practices at military medical treatment facilities. The study shall include the following:
(2) An evaluation of case management practices provided by the military departments before and during the transition of the administration of military medical treatment facilities to the Defense Health Agency pursuant to section 1073c of title 10, United States Code.
(3) A discussion of the metrics involved with determining the effectiveness of case management and the cost of case management.
(a) Study.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a study on the incidence of infertility among members of the Armed Forces, including the reserve components thereof.
(b) Matters included.—The study shall include the following:
(1) The number of members of the Armed Forces serving as of the date of the study who are diagnosed with common causes of infertility, such as polycystic ovary syndrome, pelvic inflammatory disease, uterine fibroids, endometriosis, sexually transmitted disease, testicular disorders, and male endocrine disorders.
(3) The incidence of miscarriage among women members, listed by Armed Force and military occupation.
(4) A comparison of the rates of infertility and miscarriage in the Armed Forces to such rates in the civilian population, as reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
(5) Demographic information of the members described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), include with respect to race, ethnicity, sex, age, military occupation, and possible exposures during military service to hazardous elements such as chemical and biologic agents.
(6) An assessment of the ease or delay for members in obtaining treatment for infertility, including in vitro fertilization, including—
(A) the wait times at each military medical treatment facility that has community partnerships to provide in vitro fertilization;
(a) Guidance required.—Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall establish guidance authorizing the use of acquisition pathways described in subsection (b) for the rapid acquisition of software applications and software upgrades that are intended to be fielded within one year. A contract awarded under this section—
(b) Software acquisition pathways.—The guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide for the use of the following two acquisition pathways:
(c) General requirements.—The guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide for—
(d) Expedited process.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—An acquisition conducted under the guidance required by subsection (a) shall not be subject to the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System Manual and Department of Defense Directive 5000.01, except to the extent specifically provided in such guidance.
(2) REQUIREMENTS PROCESS.—The guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide that the requirements for acquisition of software applications and software upgrades—
(A) are developed, refined, and prioritized on an iterative basis through continuous participation and collaboration by users, testers, and requirements authorities;
(B) include an identification of the need for, and users of, the software to be acquired and a rationale for how the software will support increased efficiency of the Department of Defense;
(4) EXECUTION OF RAPID ACQUISITIONS.—The Secretary shall ensure that—
(A) an acquisition conducted under the guidance required by subsection (a) is supported by an entity capable of regular automated testing of the source code of the software to be acquired and that such entity is authorized to buy storage, bandwidth, and computing capability as necessary;
(B) the Department of Defense can collect and analyze the testing data described in subparagraph (A) to make decisions regarding software acquisition and oversight;
(C) the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation and the project manager appointed under paragraph (5) design test cases to ensure that the entity described in subparagraph (A) can test the software to be acquired to ensure such software meets the requirements of the contract;
(D) the project manager appointed under paragraph (5) closely monitors the progress of an acquisition conducted under the guidance required by subsection (a);
(F) the performance of fielded versions of the software to be acquired are demonstrated and evaluated in an operational environment; and
(G) performance metrics of the software to be acquired, such as metrics relating to when the software can be fielded, delivery capabilities of the software (including speed of recovery from outages and cybersecurity vulnerabilities), and assessments and estimations of the size and complexity of such software, are automatically generated on a continuous basis and made available to the Department of Defense and the congressional defense committees.
(5) ADMINISTRATION OF SOFTWARE ACQUISITION PATHWAYS.—The guidance required by subsection (a) may provide for the use of any of the following streamlined procedures:
(A) The service acquisition executive of the military department concerned shall appoint a project manager for each acquisition of software applications and software upgrades, as determined by the service acquisition executive. Such project manager shall be appointed from among civilian employees or members of the Armed Forces who have significant and relevant experience in current software processes.
(B) Each project manager shall report with respect to such acquisition directly, and without intervening review or approval, to the service acquisition executive of the military department concerned.
(C) The service acquisition executive of the military department concerned shall evaluate the job performance of such manager on an annual basis. In conducting an evaluation under this paragraph, a service acquisition executive shall consider the extent to which the manager has achieved the objectives of the acquisition for which the manager is responsible, including quality, timeliness, and cost objectives.
(D) The project manager shall be authorized staff positions for a technical staff, including experts in software engineering to enable the manager to manage the acquisition without the technical assistance of another organizational unit of an agency to the maximum extent practicable.
(E) The project manager shall be authorized, in coordination with the users and testers of the software to be acquired, to make tradeoffs among lifecycle costs, requirements, and schedules to meet the goals of the acquisition.
(e) Contract terms.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—A contract entered into pursuant to the guidance required by subsection (a)—
(C) shall be treated as a contract for the acquisition of commercial services (as defined in section 103a of title 41, United States Code, as in effect on January 1, 2020);
(2) OPTIONS.—A contract entered into pursuant to the guidance required by subsection (a) may contain an option to extend the contract once, for a period not to exceed one year, to complete the implementation of one or more specified software applications and software upgrades identified during the period of the initial contract. Such an option may not be in an amount greater than $100,000,000 and—
(f) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prevent the use of other methods of acquisition to procure software applications and upgrades.
(a) Establishment of software development and software acquisition training and management programs.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall establish software development and software acquisition training and management programs for all software acquisition professionals, software developers, and other appropriate individuals, as determined by the Secretary of Defense to earn a certification in software development and software acquisition.
(2) PROGRAM CONTENTS.—The programs established under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) develop and expand the use of specialized training programs for chief information officers of the military departments and the Defense Agencies, service acquisition executives, program executive officers, and program managers to include training on and experience in—
(B) ensure program managers for major defense acquisition programs, defense business systems, and other software programs of the Department of Defense—
(ii) have the skills to lead a workforce that can quickly meet challenges, use software tools that prioritize continuous or frequent upgrades as such tools become available, take up opportunities provided by new innovations, and plan software activities in short iterations to learn from risks of software testing; and
(b) Reports.—
(2) CONTENTS.—Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) the status of implementing the software development and software acquisition training and management programs established under subsection (a)(1);
(B) a description of the requirements for certification, including the requirements for competencies in current software processes;
(C) a description of potential career paths in software development and software acquisition within the Department of Defense;
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER; PROGRAM MANAGER.—The terms “program executive officer” and “program manager” have the meanings given those terms, respectively, in section 1737 of title 10, United States Code.
(2) SERVICE ACQUISITION EXECUTIVE.—The terms “military department”, “Defense Agency”, and “service acquisition executive” have the meanings given those terms, respectively, in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Cost or pricing data for certain commercial products.—
(b) Data other than certified cost or pricing data for sole source contract awards.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to require an offeror for a sole source contract, subcontract, or modification of a sole source contract or subcontract, to submit to the contracting officer data other than certified cost or pricing data under section 2306a(d) of title 10, United States Code, for purposes of determining the reasonableness of the price of the contract, subcontract, or modification of the contract or subcontract.
(c) Should-cost analysis for commercial product procurements.—The Director of the Defense Contract Management Agency shall identify which commercial products (as defined in section 103 of title 41, United States Code, as in effect on January 1, 2020) should be analyzed under the should-cost review process before the Secretary of Defense enters into a contract to procure such a commercial product.
(d) Guidelines and resources on the acquisition or licensing of intellectual property.—Section 2322 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Guidelines and resources.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall develop guidelines and resources on the acquisition or licensing of intellectual property, including—
“(2) CONSULTATION.—In developing the guidelines and resources described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall regularly consult with appropriate stakeholders, including large and small businesses, traditional and non-traditional contractors (including subcontractors), and maintenance repair organizations.”.
Not later than March 31, 2021, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report on the efforts of the Secretary of Defense to secure data relating to the price reasonableness of offers from offerors. The report shall include a review of—
(1) the number of, and justification for, any waiver of requirements for submission of certified cost or pricing data for sole source contracts for spare parts issued during fiscal years 2015 through 2019 pursuant to section 2306a(b)(1)(C) of title 10, United States Code;
(2) the number of, and justification for, any exception to the requirements for submission of certified cost or pricing data for sole source contracts for spare parts provided during fiscal years 2015 through 2019 pursuant to section 2306a(b)(1)(B) of title 10, United States Code;
(3) the number of contracts awarded for which a request for cost or pricing data, including data other than certified cost or pricing data, to determine price reasonableness was denied by an offeror at the time of award;
(4) actions taken by the Secretary if an offeror refused to provide request data described in paragraph (2), including—
(a) Additional procurement limitation.—Section 2534(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(b) Implementation.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(k) Implementation of auxiliary ship component limitation.—Subsection (a)(6) applies only with respect to contracts awarded by the Secretary of a military department for new construction of an auxiliary ship after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 using funds available for National Defense Sealift Fund programs or Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy. For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘auxiliary ship’ does not include an icebreaker.”.
(a) Guidance on streamlined acquisition of covered rare earth materials.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the appropriate Under Secretary of State designated by the Secretary of State shall establish guidance to—
(2) CONTENTS.—The guidance required by paragraph (1) shall encourage the use of rare earth materials mined, refined, processed, melted, or sintered in the United States and include—
(A) a determination of when best value contracting methods should be used to ensure the viability of a rare earth material supplier;
(B) a guide to the applicability of relevant statutes, including sections 2533b and 2533c of title 10, United States Code, and other statutory or regulatory restrictions to defense contracts and subcontracts;
(C) information on current sources within the United States and covered foreign sources of rare earth materials along with commonly used commercial documentation and review processes;
(3) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in consultation with the appropriate Under Secretary of State designated by the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on—
(4) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(A) COVERED FOREIGN SOURCE.—The term “covered foreign source” means a source located in a foreign country that is not an adversary of the United States, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
(b) Authority to dispose of and acquire materials for the national defense stockpile.—
(1) DISPOSAL AUTHORITY.—Pursuant to section 5(b) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98d(b)), the National Defense Stockpile Manager shall dispose of 3,000,000 pounds of tungsten ores and concentrates contained in the National Defense Stockpile (in addition to any amount previously authorized for disposal).
(2) ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—
(A) AUTHORITY.—Using funds available in the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National Defense Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials determined to be strategic and critical materials required to meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States:
(c) National Defense Stockpile sales.—
(1) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that tantalum should be designated as a strategic and critical material under the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98 et seq.), required to meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States.
Subsection (d)(1) of section 2533c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Notwithstanding subchapter V of chapter 148 of title 10, United States Code (except for sections 2534, 2533a, and 2533b of such title), for a period of one year beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the milestone decision authority (as defined in section 2366a of title 10, United States Code) for the Columbia-class submarine program shall ensure that such program maintains the schedule approved under the Milestone B approval (as defined in such section).
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts authorized to carry out the FFG–Frigate Program may be used to award a new contract that provides for the acquisition of the following components regardless of whether those components are manufactured in the United States:
In evaluating proposals for a contract to procure a FFG(X) frigate, the Secretary of the Navy shall ensure price is a critical evaluation factor set forth in the request for proposal (solicitation number N0002419R2300) for the procurement of the frigate.
(a) Repeal.—Section 866 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1901; 10 U.S.C. 2321) is repealed.
(b) Restoration of amended provision.—Subsection (i) of section 2321 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(i) Rights and liability upon final disposition.— (1) If, upon final disposition, the contracting officer's challenge to the use or release restriction is sustained—
“(B) if the asserted restriction is found not to be substantially justified, the contractor or subcontractor asserting the restriction shall be liable to the United States for payment of the cost to the United States of reviewing the asserted restriction and the fees and other expenses (as defined in section 2412(d)(2)(A) of title 28) incurred by the United States in challenging the asserted restriction, unless special circumstances would make such payment unjust.
“(2) If, upon final disposition, the contracting officer's challenge to the use or release restriction is not sustained—
“(B) the United States shall be liable for payment to the party asserting the restriction for fees and other expenses (as defined in section 2412(d)(2)(A) of title 28) incurred by the party asserting the restriction in defending the asserted restriction if the challenge by the United States is found not to be made in good faith.”.
Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is repealed.
(a) In general.—Section 828 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is repealed.
(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 825 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1466) is amended—
(a) Access to technical data, records, and information.—Section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Access to technical data, records, and information.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a process to provide the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering access to all technical data, records, and information necessary to evaluate the technological maturity, operational effectiveness, and operational suitability of products and technologies proposed to be acquired under the guidance required by subsection (a).”.
(b) Dollar threshold for acquisition programs.—Subsection (a) of such section is amended—
(2) in paragraph (1), as so designated, by striking “acquisition programs that are intended to be completed in a period of two to five years.” and inserting the following: acquisition programs—
(a) In general.—Not later than December 1, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on lessons learned and best practices identified through the use of the “middle tier” of acquisition programs described under section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). The briefing shall be accompanied by a written analysis—
(2) describing the extent to which covered risk should be a factor in determining which acquisition authority to use, including—
(A) an acquisition pathway as described under subsection (b) of section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note);
(a) Consistency in establishment of rates for progress payments or performance-based payments.—Section 2307(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting the following new paragraph:
“(3) Except as provided in subsection (g), the Secretary of Defense shall not establish a rate for progress payments or a rate for performance-based payments that is lower than the rate for progress payments or a rate for performance-based payments, as applicable, established by another head of an agency.”.
(b) Payment authority.—Section 2307(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking “The head of any agency may” and inserting “The head of an agency may—”.
(c) Notice of revision to rates for progress payments or performance-based payments.—
(1) TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of Defense may not issue rules to revise the rate for progress payments or the rate for performance-based payments unless the Secretary provides the congressional defense committees with a notice of determination of need for such revision. This notice shall include—
Section 2322a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:
“(c) Rights to noncommercial computer software.—As part of any negotiation for the acquisition of noncommercial computer software, the Secretary of Defense may not require a contractor to sell or otherwise relinquish to the Federal Government any rights to noncommercial computer software developed exclusively at private expense, except for rights related to—
“(1) corrections or changes to such software or related materials for such software furnished to the contractor by the Department of Defense;
“(2) such software or related materials for such software that is otherwise publicly available or that has been released or disclosed by the contractor or subcontractor without restrictions on further use, release, or disclosure, other than a release or disclosure resulting from the sale, transfer, or other assignment of interest in such software or related materials to another party;
“(3) such software or related materials for such software obtained with unlimited rights under another contract with the Federal Government or as a result of such a negotiation; or
“(4) such software or related materials for such software furnished to the Department of Defense under a contract or subcontract that includes—
“(d) Consideration of specially negotiated licenses.—The Secretary of Defense shall, to the maximum extent practicable, negotiate and enter into a contract with a contractor for a specially negotiated license for noncommercial computer software or related materials for such software necessary to support the product support strategy of a major weapon system or subsystem of a major weapon system.”.
Section 2329 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting “, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation,” after “Secretary of Defense”;
(a) In general.—Section 2371b of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:
“(i) Data collection and use.— (1) The service acquisition executive of each military department shall collect data on the use of the authority under this section by the applicable military department, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall collect data on all other use of such authority by the Department of Defense, including use by the Defense Agencies.
“(j) Report.— (1) Not later than December 31, 2019, and each December 31 thereafter the Secretary of Defense shall annually submit to the congressional defense committees a report covering the preceding fiscal year on the use of the authority under this section. Each report shall summarize the data collected under subsection (i) on the nature and extent of each such use of the authority, including a description—
“(A) of the participants to an agreement entered into pursuant to the authority of subsection (a) or a follow-on contract or transaction entered into pursuant to the authority of subsection (f);
“(B) of the quantity of prototype projects to be produced pursuant to such an agreement, follow-on contract, or transaction;
“(C) of the amount of payments made pursuant to each such agreement, follow-on contract, or transaction;
“(D) of the purpose, description, and status of prototype projects carried out pursuant to each such agreement, follow-on contract, or transaction; and
(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 873 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1905; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is repealed.
(a) Competition requirements for purchases from Federal Prison Industries.—Subsections (a) and (b) of section 2410n of title 10, United States Code, are amended to read as follows:
“(a) Market research.—Before purchasing a product listed in the latest edition of the Federal Prison Industries catalog published under section 4124(d) of title 18, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct market research to determine whether such product—
“(b) Competition requirement.—If the Secretary determines that a Federal Prison Industries product is not comparable to products available from the private sector and does not best meet the needs of the Department of Defense in terms of price, quality, or time of delivery, the Secretary shall use competitive procedures or make an individual purchase under a multiple award contract for the procurement of the product. In conducting such a competition or making such a purchase, the Secretary shall consider a timely offer from Federal Prison Industries.”.
Section 818(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1463; 10 U.S.C. 2305 note) is amended by striking “$100,000,000” each place it appears and inserting “$50,000,000”.
(a) Repeal of Government Accountability Office reporting requirements on use of lowest price technically acceptable source selection criteria.—
(1) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—Section 813 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (10 U.S.C. 2305 note) is amended by striking subsection (d).
(2) OTHER AGENCIES.—Section 880 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1910; 41 U.S.C. 3701 note) is amended by striking subsection (d) and redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).
(b) Revision to the Federal procurement data system.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of General Services, in coordination with the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, shall direct appropriate revisions to the Federal procurement data system established pursuant to section 1122(a)(4) of title 41, United States Code (or any successor system), to facilitate the collection of complete, timely, and reliable data on the source selection processes used by Federal agencies for the contract actions being reported in the system. The Administrator of General Services shall ensure that data is collected—
(a) Modification of justification and approval requirement.—Notwithstanding section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2405)—
(1) no justification and approval is required under such section for a sole-source contract awarded by the Department of Defense in a covered procurement for an amount not exceeding $100,000,000; and
(2) for purposes of subsections (a)(2) and (c)(3)(A) of such section, the appropriate official designated to approve the justification for a sole-source contract awarded by the Department of Defense in a covered procurement exceeding $100,000,000 is the official designated in section 2304(f)(1)(B)(ii) of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Guidance.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue guidance to implement the authority under subsection (a).
(a) Professional certification requirement.—
(1) PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR ALL ACQUISITION WORKFORCE PERSONNEL.—Section 1701a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(B) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:
“(c) Professional certification.— (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall implement a certification program to provide for a professional certification requirement for all members of the acquisition workforce. Except as provided in paragraph (2), the certification requirement for any career field of the acquisition workforce shall be based on nationally or internationally recognized standards developed by a third-party entity.
“(2) Requirements for Secretary.—If the Secretary determines that, for a particular acquisition workforce career field, the third-party entity described in paragraph (1) does not meet the needs of the Department, the Secretary shall establish the professional certification requirement for that career field that conforms with nationally or internationally recognized standards. The Secretary shall determine the best approach to implement such requirement for that career field, including implementation through entities outside the Department of Defense and may be designed and implemented without regard to section 1746 of this title.”.
(2) CERTIFICATION RENEWAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 1723(a) of such title is amended by striking the second sentence.
(b) Elimination of statutory requirement for completion of 24 semester credit hours.—
(1) QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTING OFFICERS.—Section 1724 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(B) in subsection (b), by striking “requirements” in the first sentences of paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting “requirement”;
(2) SELECTION CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES.—Section 1732 of such title is amended—
(A) in subsection (b)(1)—
(c) Defense Acquisition University curriculum development.—Section 1746(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, and with commercial providers of training,” after “military departments”.
(d) Career paths.—
(1) CAREER PATH REQUIRED FOR EACH ACQUISITION WORKFORCE CAREER FIELD.—Paragraph (4) of section 1701a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(3) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF CAREER PATHS.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the requirements of paragraph (4) of section 1701a(b) of title 10, United States Code (as amended by paragraph (1)), not later than the end of the two-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(e) Career fields.—
(1) DESIGNATION OF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE CAREER FIELDS.—Section 1721(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Secretary shall also designate in regulations those career fields in the Department of Defense that are acquisition workforce career fields for purposes of this chapter.”.
(3) (A) The heading of subchapter II of chapter 87 of such title is amended to read as follows:
“SUBCHAPTER II—ACQUISITION POSITIONS AND ACQUISITION WORKFORCE CAREER FIELDS”.
(4) DEADLINE FOR DESIGNATION OF CAREER FIELDS.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the requirements of second sentence of section 1721(a) of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), not later than the end of the six-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Key work experiences.—
(1) DEVELOPMENT OF KEY WORK EXPERIENCES FOR EACH ACQUISITION WORKFORCE CAREER FIELD.—Section 1722b of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(2) PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF KEY WORK EXPERIENCES.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan identifying the specific actions the Department of Defense has taken, and is planning to take, to develop and establish key work experiences for each acquisition workforce career field as required by subsection (c) of section 1722b of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1). The plan shall include specification of the percentage of the acquisition workforce, or funds available for administration of the acquisition workforce on an annual basis, that the Secretary will dedicate towards developing such key work experiences.
(g) Applicability of career path requirements to all members of acquisition workforce.—Section 1723(b) of such title is amended by striking “the critical acquisition-related”.
(h) Competency development.—
(1) IN GENERAL.— (A) Subchapter V of chapter 87 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 1765. Competency development
“(a) In general.—For each acquisition workforce career field, the Secretary of Defense shall establish, for the civilian personnel in that career field, defined proficiency standards and technical and nontechnical competencies which shall be used in personnel qualification assessments.
“(b) Negotiations.—Any action taken by the Secretary under this section, or to implement this section, shall not be subject to the requirements of chapter 71 of title 5.”.
(i) Termination of defense Acquisition Corps.—
(1) The Acquisition Corps for the Department of Defense referred to in section 1731(a) of title 10, United States Code, is terminated.
(3) Subsection (b) of section 1731 of such title is transferred to the end of section 1733 of such title, as amended by paragraph (2), and amended—
(4) Subsection (e) of section 1732 of such title is transferred to the end of section 1733 of such title, as amended by paragraphs (2) and (3), redesignated as subsection (c), and amended—
(6) (A) Section 1733 of such title, as amended by paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), is redesignated as section 1731.
(7) (A) The heading of subchapter III of chapter 87 of such title is amended to read as follows:
“SUBCHAPTER III—CRITICAL ACQUISITION POSITIONS”.
(8) Section 1723(a)(2) of such title is amended by striking “section 1733 of this title” and inserting “section 1731 of this title”.
(9) Section 1725 of such title is amended—
(10) Section 1734 of such title is amended—
(A) by striking “of the Acquisition Corps” in subsections (e)(1) and (h) and inserting “of the acquisition workforce”; and
(11) Section 1737 of such title is amended—
(12) Section 1742(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking “the Acquisition Corps” and inserting “acquisition positions in the Department of Defense”.
(13) Section 2228(a)(4) of such title is amended by striking “under section 1733(b)(1)(C) of this title” and inserting “under section 1731 of this title”.
(14) Section 7016(b)(5)(B) of such title is amended by striking “under section 1733 of this title” and inserting “under section 1731 of this title”.
(15) Section 8016(b)(4)(B) of such title is amended by striking “under section 1733 of this title” and inserting “under section 1731 of this title”.
(a) Public-private exchange program for the acquisition workforce.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter IV of chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 1749. Public-private exchange program for the acquisition workforce
“(a) Assignment authority.— (1) The Secretary may, by rule, establish a program to be known as the ‘Public-Private Exchange Program for the Acquisition Workforce’ to temporarily assign a member of the acquisition workforce to a private-sector organization or an employee of a private-sector organization to the Department of Defense if—
“(A) pursuant to an agreement between the Secretary, the private-sector organization, and the individual to be temporarily assigned described in subsection (b); and
“(2) Members of the acquisition workforce are eligible for a temporary assignment under this section as follows:
“(b) Agreements.— (1) An agreement entered into under this section shall include the following:
“(B) In the case of an agreement for the temporary assignment of a member of the acquisition workforce, a requirement that the member of the acquisition workforce, upon completion of the temporary assignment, will—
“(C) A provision that if the individual to be temporarily assigned fails to carry out the agreement, such individual shall be liable to the United States for payment of all expenses of the assignment, unless that failure was for good and sufficient reason, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
“(D) In the case of an agreement for the temporary assignment of a member of the acquisition workforce, language ensuring that such member of the acquisition workforce does not improperly use pre-decisional or draft deliberative information that such member may be privy to or aware of related to Department programing, budgeting, resourcing, acquisition, or procurement for the benefit or advantage of the private-sector organization.
“(2) An amount for which an individual is liable under paragraph (1)(C) shall be treated as a debt due the United States.
“(3) The Secretary may waive, in whole or in part, collection of a debt described in paragraph (2) based on a determination that the collection would be against equity and good conscience and not in the best interests of the United States, after taking into account any indication of fraud, misrepresentation, fault, or lack of good faith on the part of the individual who is liable for the debt.
“(c) Termination.—An assignment under this section may, at any time and for any reason, be terminated by the Department of Defense or the private-sector organization concerned.
“(d) Duration.— (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), an assignment under this section shall be for a period of not more than two years, renewable up to a total of four years.
“(e) Status of individuals assigned to private-sector organizations.— (1) A member of the acquisition workforce who is assigned to a private-sector organization under this section shall be considered, during the period of assignment, to be on detail to a regular duty or work assignment, as applicable, in the Department for all purposes.
“(2) In the case of a civilian member of the acquisition workforce, the written agreement established under subsection (b)(1)—
“(A) shall address the specific terms and conditions related to the civilian member’s continued status as a Federal employee; and
“(B) in the case of an assignment of nine months or longer, shall provide that, if the civilian member successfully completes the assignment (as determined by the Secretary), the civilian member shall be eligible for consideration for placement in a new position under programs of the Department of Defense providing priority placement to certain employees.
“(3) With respect to an assignment of a member of the acquisition workforce under this section, the Secretary—
“(A) may, in the case of a civilian member of the acquisition workforce, provide for the performance, during the member’s absence, of the normal duties and functions of that member by making a temporary or term appointment under general civil service authorities for such appointments;
“(B) shall ensure that the normal duties and functions of the civilian member of the acquisition workforce described in subparagraph (A) can be reasonably performed by other personnel of the Department of Defense without the permanent transfer or permanent reassignment of other personnel of the Department of Defense, including members of the armed forces;
“(f) Terms and conditions for private-sector employees.—An employee of a private-sector organization who is assigned to a Department of Defense organization under this section—
“(1) shall continue to receive pay and benefits from the private-sector organization from which such employee is assigned and shall not receive pay or benefits from the Department of Defense, except as provided in paragraph (2);
“(2) is deemed to be an employee of the Department of Defense for the purposes of—
“(F) chapter 21 of title 41;
“(3) shall not have access to any trade secrets or to any other nonpublic information which is of commercial value to the private-sector organization from which such employee is assigned;
“(g) Prohibition against charging certain costs to the Federal government.—A private-sector organization may not charge the Department or any other agency of the Federal Government, as direct or indirect costs under a Federal contract, the costs of pay or benefits paid by the organization to an employee assigned to a Department organization under this section for the period of the assignment.
“(h) Consideration of training needs for members of the acquisition workforce.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense shall take into consideration how assignments under this section might best be used to help meet the needs of the Department of Defense with respect to the training of members of the acquisition workforce.
“(i) Funding; use of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund.—Funds for the expenses for the program established under this section shall be provided from amounts in the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund. Expenses for the program include—
“(1) notwithstanding section 1705(e)(5) of this title, the base salary of a civilian member of the acquisition workforce assigned to a private-sector organization under this section, during the period of that assignment;
(b) Use of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund.—Section 1705(e)(1) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
(a) In general.—
(1) Chapter 141 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2409 the following new section:
Ҥ 2409a. Incentives and consideration for qualified training programs
“(a) Incentives.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop workforce development investment incentives for a contractor that implements a qualified training program to develop the workforce of the contractor in a manner consistent with the needs of the Department of Defense.
“(b) Consideration of qualified training programs.—The Secretary of Defense shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to require that the system used by the Federal Government to monitor or record contractor past performance includes an analysis of the availability, quality, and effectiveness of a qualified training program of an offeror as part of the past performance rating of such offeror.
“(c) Qualified training program defined.—The term ‘qualified training program’ means any of the following:
“(1) A program eligible to receive funds under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.).
“(2) A program eligible to receive funds under the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2301 et seq.).
“(3) A program registered under the Act of August 16, 1937 (commonly known as the ‘National Apprenticeship Act’; Stat. 664, chapter 663; 29 U.S.C. 50 et seq.).
(a) Requirements.—Subchapter III of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2870. Utilization of qualified apprentices by military construction contractors
“(a) Certification required.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall require each prospective contractor on a military construction project to certify to the Secretary that, if awarded a contract for the project, the prospective contractor will make a good faith effort to meet or exceed the apprenticeship employment goal on such project.
“(b) Apprenticeship employment goal.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—In this section, the term ‘apprenticeship employment goal’ means the utilization of qualified apprentices as not less than 20 percent of the total workforce employed in an apprenticeable occupation (as determined by the Secretary of Labor).
“(2) QUALIFIED APPRENTICE.—In paragraph (1), the term ‘qualified apprentice’ means an employee participating in an apprenticeship program that is registered with—
“(A) the Office of Apprenticeship of the Employment Training Administration of the Department of Labor pursuant to the Act of August 16, 1937 (popularly known as the ‘National Apprenticeship Act’; 29 U.S.C. 50 et seq.); or
“(c) Consideration of apprenticeship employment goal.—The Secretary of Defense shall revise the Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to require that the system used by the Federal Government to monitor or record contractor past performance includes an analysis of whether the contractor has made a good faith effort to meet or exceed the apprenticeship employment goal, including consideration of actual utilization by the contractor of qualified apprentices, as part of the past performance rating of such contractor.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“2870. Utilization of qualified apprentices by military construction contractors.”.
(a) Assessment.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Federal Acquisition Security Council (established under section 1322 of title 41, United States Code) and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall conduct a comprehensive assessment of—
(b) Purpose.—The assessment described in subsection (a) shall include—
(1) an identification of instances in which the Federal Acquisition Security Council has identified supply chain risks (as defined in section 4713(k) of title 41, United States Code) that are specific to the defense industrial base and other threat assessments related to the procurement of covered articles (as defined in such section);
(2) an identification of and suggestions for guidance on the process of debarment and suspension (including debarment and suspension for nonprocurement programs and activities) of covered contractors to address supply chain risks relating to acquisitions for the Department of Defense, including acquisitions involving other executive agencies; and
(c) Actions following assessment.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, based on the results of the assessment required by subsection (a)—
(1) issue or revise guidance to ensure any entity within the Department of Defense that procures covered equipment and services implements a risk-based approach with respect to such a procurement that addresses—
(2) issue or revise guidance to ensure that remedial actions, including debarment or suspension, are taken with respect to a covered contractor who has failed to detect and avoid suspect covered equipment and services or otherwise failed to exercise due diligence in the detection and avoidance of such suspect covered equipment and services;
(3) establish a process for ensuring that a Department of Defense employee provide a written report to the appropriate Government authorities and the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (or a similar program designated by the Secretary) not later than 60 days after such an employee becomes aware, or has reason to suspect that—
(d) Regulations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to address the detection and avoidance of suspect covered equipment and services.
(2) CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES.—The revised regulations issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall provide that—
(A) covered contractors who supply covered equipment or services are responsible for detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of suspect covered equipment or services and for any contract modification or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such suspect covered equipment or services; and
(B) the cost of suspect covered equipment or services and the cost of contract modification or corrective action that may be required to remedy the use or inclusion of such suspect covered equipment or services are not allowable costs under defense contracts, unless—
(i) the covered contractor has an operational system to detect and avoid suspect covered equipment or services that has been reviewed and approved by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (e)(2)(B);
(3) REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPPLIERS.—The revised regulations issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall—
(A) require that covered contractors obtain covered equipment or services—
(i) from the original manufacturers of the equipment or their authorized dealers, or from suppliers that meet requirements of subparagraph (C) or (D) and, with respect to suppliers of telecommunications equipment or video surveillance equipment, that obtain such equipment exclusively from the original manufacturers of the parts of such equipment or their authorized dealers; and
(B) establish requirements for notification of the Department, and for inspection, testing, and authentication of covered equipment and services that covered contractor obtains from an alternate supplier;
(C) establish qualification requirements, consistent with the requirements of section 2319 of title 10, United States Code, pursuant to which the Secretary may identify suppliers that have appropriate policies and procedures in place to detect and avoid suspect covered equipment and services; and
(4) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—The revised regulations issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall require that any covered contractor provide a written report to the appropriate Government authorities and the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (or a similar program designated by the Secretary) not later than 60 days after such covered contractor becomes aware, or has reason to suspect that—
(e) Improvement of contractor systems for detection and avoidance of suspect covered equipment and services.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall implement a program to enhance the detection and avoidance of the acquisition of suspect covered equipment and services by covered contractors.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The program implemented pursuant to paragraph (1) shall—
(A) require covered contractors to establish policies and procedures to eliminate suspect covered equipment and services from the defense supply chain, which policies and procedures shall address—
(B) establish processes for the review and approval of contractor systems for the detection and avoidance of the acquisition of suspect covered equipment and services by covered contractors, which processes shall be comparable to the processes established for contractor business systems under section 893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4311; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).
(f) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Secretary from entering into a contract with a covered contractor to provide a service that connects to the facilities of a third party, such as backhaul, roaming, or interconnection arrangements.
(g) Report to Congress.—Not later than 180 days after completing the assessment required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the results of the assessment and the actions taken following the assessment pursuant to subsection (c).
(h) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) COVERED EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES.—The term “covered equipment and services” means telecommunications equipment, telecommunications services, video surveillance equipment, and video surveillance services manufactured or controlled by an entity for which the principal place of business of such entity is located in foreign country that is an adversary of the United States, but does not include telecommunications equipment or video surveillance equipment (other than optical transmission components) that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles.
(2) COVERED CONTRACTOR.—The term “covered contractor” means a contractor or subcontractor (at any tier) that supplies covered equipment and services to the Department of Defense.
(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of Defense shall only award contracts for the procurement of telecommunications services or the installation of telecommunications infrastructure on national security installations on territories of the United States located in the Pacific Ocean to allowed contractors.
(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to contracts the procurement of telecommunications services or the installation of telecommunications infrastructure if such telecommunications services or telecommunications infrastructure does not process or carry any information about the operations of the Armed Forces of the United States or otherwise concern the national security of the United States.
(c) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the restriction of subsection (a) upon a written determination that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States and either—
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ALLOWED CONTRACTOR.—The term “allowed contractor” means—
(A) an entity that is 100 percent owned by persons located in the United States that has submitted an offer for a contract let by the Department of Defense; or
(B) an entity that—
(i) is 100 percent owned by persons located in the United States or in a covered foreign country that has submitted an offer for a contract let by the Department of Defense; and
(ii) does not have significant connections, including major equipment purchases, ownership interests, or joint ventures, with any entity identified in subsection (f)(3) of section 889 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232; 132 Stat. 1918; 41 U.S.C. 3901 note)
(2) COVERED FOREIGN COUNTRY.—The term “covered foreign country” means a foreign country the government of which permits allowed contractors to compete on a fair basis for contracts for the procurement of telecommunications services or the installation of telecommunications infrastructure let by the government of such foreign country.
(3) NATIONAL SECURITY INSTALLATION.—The term “national security installation” means any facility operated by the Department of Defense.
(4) TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE.—The term “telecommunications service” has the meaning given in section 3 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153).
(a) Sense of congress.—Congress finds that to comprehensively address the supply chain vulnerabilities of the Department of Defense, defense contractors must be incentivized to prioritize security in a manner which exceeds basic compliance with mitigation practices relating to cybersecurity risk and supply chain security standards. Defense contractors can no longer pass unknown risks on to the Department of Defense but should be provided with the tools to meet the needs of the Department with respect to cybersecurity risk and supply chain security. Incentives for defense contractors will help stimulate efforts within the defense industrial base to minimize vulnerabilities in hardware, software, and supply chain services. The Department of Defense must develop policies and regulations that move security from a cost that defense contractors seek to minimize to a key consideration in the award of contracts, equal in importance to cost, schedule, and performance.
(b) Inclusion of security as primary purpose for the department of defense acquisition.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall the revise the statement of purpose in the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement added by section 801(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1449; U.S.C. 2302 note) to include the security of goods acquired by the Department of Defense as one of the primary objectives of Department of Defense acquisition. The Secretary shall revise applicable Department of Defense Instructions, regulations, and directives to implement the inclusion of security as a primary purpose of Department of Defense acquisition.
(c) Certification of risk.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Before making a milestone decision with respect to a major defense acquisition program (as defined under section 2430 of title 10, United States Code), a major automated information system, or major system (as defined under section 2302d of title 10, United States Code), the vice chief of the Armed Force concerned shall issue a written assessment to the Vice Chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the head of the Defense Acquisition Board stating the determination made by the vice chief of the armed force concerned of the risk to the supply chain associated with the procurement. Such assessment shall include—
(2) AVAILABILITY TO THE CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.—Upon request, the vice chief of the Armed Force concerned shall make available to the congressional defense committees a certification required under paragraph (1), along with the data on which such certification is based, not later than 15 days after the submission of a request.
(d) Disputes relating to acquisitions decisions.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, the Vice Chief of Naval Operations, the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps shall each have the authority to submit to the Secretary of Defense a written statement of dispute relating to a decision made by the Defense Acquisition Board with respect to an acquisition. A dispute submitted under this subsection shall include any reason why the decision fails to effectively address concerns regarding the item to be acquired.
(a) Prohibition on agency operation or procurement.—The Secretary of Defense may not operate or enter into or renew a contract for the procurement of—
(1) a covered unmanned aircraft system that—
(A) is manufactured in a covered foreign country or by an entity domiciled in a covered foreign country;
(B) uses flight controllers, radios, data transmission devices, cameras, or gimbals manufactured in a covered foreign country or by an entity domiciled in a covered foreign country;
(b) Exemption.—The Secretary of Defense is exempt from the restriction under subsection (a) if the operation or procurement is for the purposes of—
(c) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the restriction under subsection (a) on a case by case basis by certifying in writing to the congressional defense committees that the operation or procurement is required in the national interest of the United States.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) COVERED FOREIGN COUNTRY.—The term “covered foreign country” means a country labeled as a strategic competitor in the “Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge” issued by the Department of Defense pursuant to section 113 of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Process for enhanced supply chain scrutiny.—Section 807(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1456; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(b) Technical amendment.—Subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking “Not later than” and all that follows through “the Secretary” and inserting “The Secretary”.
(c) Effective date.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the process established under section 807 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) to carry out the requirements of this section.
(a) Guidance, reports, and limitation on the availability of funds relating to covered defense business systems.—
(1) AMENDMENTS TO GUIDANCE FOR COVERED DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEMS.—Section 2222(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) REPORTS.—
(A) GUIDANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) a report—
(B) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.—Not later than December 31, 2019, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the information technology enterprise architecture developed under section 2222(e)(4)(B) of title 10, United States Code, which shall include the plan for improving the information technology and computing infrastructure described in such section and a schedule for implementing the plan.
(C) DEFENSE BUSINESS ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.—Not later than March 31, 2020, the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a plan and schedule for integrating the defense business enterprise architecture developed under subsection (e) of section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, into the information technology enterprise architecture, as required under paragraph (4)(A) of such subsection.
(3) LIMITATION.—
(A) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for the Office of the Secretary of Defense after December 31, 2019, until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under subsection (b)(1)(A).
(B) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for the Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Office of the Chief Information Officer, and the Office of the Chief Management Officer after March 31, 2020, until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under subsection (b)(1)(B).
(C) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for the Office of the Chief Information Officer after December 31, 2019, until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under subsection (b)(2).
(D) Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for the Office of the Chief Management Officer and the Office of the Chief Information Officer after March 31, 2020, until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under subsection (b)(3).
(b) Pilot program on data rights as an evaluation factor.—
(1) PILOT PROGRAM.—Not later than February 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments shall jointly carry out a pilot program to assess mechanisms to evaluate intellectual property to include technical data deliverables, associated license rights, and commercially available intellectual property valuation analysis and techniques in major defense acquisition programs (as defined in section 2430 of title 10, United States Code) selected pursuant to subsection (b) to ensure—
(2) SELECTION OF MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS.—Each Secretary of a military department shall select one major defense acquisition program for which such Secretary has responsibility to include in the pilot program established under subsection (a).
(3) CADRE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS.—At Milestone A and Milestone B for each major defense acquisition program selected pursuant to subsection (b), the cadre of intellectual property experts established under section 2322(b) of title 10, United States Code, shall identify, to the maximum extent practicable, intellectual property evaluation techniques to obtain quantitative and qualitative analysis related to the value of intellectual property rights during the procurement, production, deployment, operations, and support phases of the acquisition of each such major defense acquisition program.
(4) ACTIVITIES.—The pilot program established under this section shall include the following:
(A) Assessment of commercial valuation techniques for intellectual property rights for use by the Department of Defense.
(B) Assessment of feasibility of oversight by the Secretary of Defense to standardize practices and procedures.
(C) Assessment of contracting mechanisms to increase the speed of delivery of intellectual property to the Armed Forces or to reduce sustainment costs.
(D) Assessment of acquisition planning necessary to ensure procurement of intellectual property deliverables and intellectual property rights necessary for Government-planned sustainment activities.
(E) Engagement with private-sector entities to—
(i) support the development of strategies and program requirements to aid in acquisition and transition planning for intellectual property;
(5) ASSESSMENT.—Not later than February 1, 2021, and annually thereafter until the termination date of the pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program established under subsection (a). The report shall include—
(B) a description of the specific activities in subsection (d) that were performed with respect to each major defense acquisition program selected pursuant to subsection (b);
(c) Report and limitation on availability of funds relating to modular open system approach for major defense acquisition programs.—
(1) STUDY GUIDANCE FOR ANALYSES OF ALTERNATIVES FOR MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION PROGRAMS.—
(A) REPORT.—Not later than December 31, 2019, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Director of Cost Assessment and Performance Evaluation, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the study guidance required under section 2446b(b) of title 10, United States Code.
(B) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for the Office of the Director of Cost Assessment and Performance Evaluation after December 31, 2019, until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under paragraph (1).
(2) POLICY RELATING TO AVAILABILITY OF MAJOR SYSTEM INTERFACES AND SUPPORT FOR MODULAR OPEN SYSTEM APPROACH.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 2446c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(B) REPORT.—Not later than December 31, 2019, the Secretary of each military department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the policy required under section 2446c of title 10, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1).
(C) LIMITATION.—Beginning on January 1, 2020, if any report required under paragraph (2) has not been submitted to the congressional defense committees, not more than 75 percent of the funds specified in paragraph (4) may be obligated or expended until the date on which all of the reports required under paragraph (2) have been submitted.
(d) Report on intellectual property policy and the cadre of intellectual property experts.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1450) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Report.—Not later than October 1, 2019, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(2) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under subsection (c) of section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1450), as added by this section.
(e) Limitation on availability of funds for the Office of the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for the Office of the Chief Management Officer until the date on which the Chief Management Officer submits to the congressional defense committees—
(1) the certification of cost savings described in subparagraph (A) of section 921(b)(5) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note); or
(f) Report and limitation on the availability of funds relating to the “middle tier” of acquisition programs.—
(1) REPORT.—Not later than December 15, 2019, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the guidance required under section 804(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note). The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment will ensure such guidance includes the business case elements required by an acquisition program established pursuant to such guidance and the metrics required to assess the performance of such a program.
(2) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended for an acquisition program established pursuant to the guidance required under section 804(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) after December 15, 2019, and no such acquisition program may be conducted under the authority provided by such section after December 15, 2019, until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment submits the report required under subsection (a).
(g) Defense acquisition workforce certification and education requirements.—
(1) PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—
(A) PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR ALL ACQUISITION WORKFORCE PERSONNEL.—Section 1701a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(ii) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):
“(c) Professional certification.—
“(1) The Secretary of Defense shall implement a certification program to provide for a professional certification requirement for all members of the acquisition workforce. Except as provided in paragraph (2), the certification requirement for any acquisition workforce career field shall be based on standards under a third-party accredited program based on nationally or internationally recognized standards.
“(2) If the Secretary determines that, for a particular acquisition workforce career field, a third-party accredited program based on nationally or internationally recognized standards does not exist, the Secretary shall establish the certification requirement for that career field that conforms with the practices of national or international accrediting bodies. The certification requirement for any such career field shall be implemented using the best approach determined by the Secretary for meeting the certification requirement for that career field, including implementation through entities outside the Department of Defense and may be designed and implemented without regard to section 1746 of this title.”.
(C) PARTICIPATION IN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS.—Subsection (b) of such section is further amended—
(i) by redesignating paragraphs (6), (7), (8), and (9) as paragraphs (7), (8), (9), and (10), respectively; and
(2) ELIMINATION OF STATUTORY REQUIREMENT FOR COMPLETION OF 24 SEMESTER CREDIT HOURS.—
(A) QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTING POSITIONS.—Section 1724 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(ii) in subsection (b), by striking “requirements” in the first sentences of paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting “requirement”;
(h) Enhancing defense acquisition workforce career fields.—
(1) CAREER PATHS.—
(A) CAREER PATH REQUIRED FOR EACH ACQUISITION WORKFORCE CAREER FIELD.—Paragraph (4) of section 1701a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(C) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF CAREER PATHS.—The implementation of a career path for each acquisition workforce career field required by paragraph (4) of section 1701a(b) of title 10, United States Code (as amended by paragraph (1)), shall be completed by the Secretary of Defense not later than the end of the two-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) CAREER FIELDS.—
(A) DESIGNATION OF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE CAREER FIELDS.—Section 1721(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Secretary shall also designate in regulations those career fields in the Department of Defense that are acquisition workforce career fields for purposes of this chapter.”.
(C) (i) The heading of subchapter II of chapter 87 of such title is amended to read as follows:
“SUBCHAPTER II—ACQUISITION POSITIONS AND ACQUISITION WORKFORCE CAREER FIELDS”.
(D) DEADLINE FOR DESIGNATION OF CAREER FIELDS.—The designation of acquisition workforce career fields required by the second sentence of section 1721(a) of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), shall be made by the Secretary of Defense not later than the end of the six-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) KEY WORK EXPERIENCES.—
(A) DEVELOPMENT OF KEY WORK EXPERIENCES FOR EACH ACQUISITION WORKFORCE CAREER FIELD.—Section 1722b of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(B) PLAN FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF KEY WORK EXPERIENCES.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan identifying the specific actions the Department of Defense has taken, and is planning to take, to develop and establish key work experiences for each acquisition workforce career field as required by subsection (c) of section 1722b of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1). The plan shall include specification of the percentage of the acquisition workforce, or funds available for administration of the acquisition workforce on an annual basis, that the Secretary will dedicate towards developing such key work experiences.
(4) APPLICABILITY OF CAREER PATH REQUIREMENTS TO ALL MEMBERS OF ACQUISITION WORKFORCE.—Section 1723(b) of such title is amended by striking “the critical acquisition-related”.
(5) COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.— (i) Subchapter V of chapter 87 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 1765. Competency development
“(a) In general.—For each acquisition workforce career field, the Secretary of Defense shall establish, for the civilian personnel in that career field, defined proficiency standards and technical and nontechnical competencies which shall be used in personnel qualification assessments.
“(b) Negotiations.—Any action taken by the Secretary under this section, or to implement this section, shall not be subject to the requirements of chapter 71 of title 5.”.
(B) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—The establishment of defined proficiency standards and technical and nontechnical competencies required by section 1765 of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), shall be made by the Secretary of Defense not later than the end of the two-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(6) TERMINATION OF DEFENSE ACQUISITION CORPS.—
(A) The Acquisition Corps for the Department of Defense referred to in section 1731(a) of title 10, United States Code, is terminated.
(C) Subsection (b) of section 1731 of such title is transferred to the end of section 1733 of such title, as amended by paragraph (2), and amended—
(D) Subsection (e) of section 1732 of such title is transferred to the end of section 1733 of such title, as amended by paragraphs (2) and (3), redesignated as subsection (c), and amended—
(F) (i) Section 1733 of such title, as amended by paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), is redesignated as section 1731.
(G) (i) The heading of subchapter III of chapter 87 of such title is amended to read as follows:
“SUBCHAPTER III—CRITICAL ACQUISITION POSITIONS”.
(H) Section 1723(a)(2) of such title is amended by striking “section 1733 of this title” and inserting “section 1731 of this title”.
(I) Section 1725 of such title is amended—
(J) Section 1734 of such title is amended—
(i) by striking “of the Acquisition Corps” in subsections (e)(1) and (h) and inserting “of the acquisition workforce”; and
(K) Section 1737 of such title is amended—
(L) Section 1742(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking “the Acquisition Corps” and inserting “acquisition positions in the Department of Defense”.
(M) Section 2228(a)(4) of such title is amended by striking “under section 1733(b)(1)(C) of this title” and inserting “under section 1731 of this title”.
(N) Section 7016(b)(5)(B) of such title is amended by striking “under section 1733 of this title” and inserting “under section 1731 of this title”.
(O) Section 8016(b)(4)(B) of such title is amended by striking “under section 1733 of this title” and inserting “under section 1731 of this title”.
(i) Establishment of Defense Civilian Acquisition Training Corps.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 112 the following new chapter:
“2200n. Establishment.
“2200o. Program elements.
“2200p. Model authorities.
“2200q. Definitions.
“For the purposes of preparing selected students for public service in Department of Defense occupations relating to acquisition, science, and engineering, the Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a Defense Civilian Acquisition Training Corps program, organized into one or more units, at civilian institutions of higher education offering a program leading to a baccalaureate degree.
“In establishing the program, the Secretary of Defense shall determine the following:
“(6) The method by which a successful graduate of the program may gain immediate employment in the Department of Defense.
“In making determinations under section 2200o of this title, the Secretary of Defense shall use the authorities under chapters 103 and 111 of this title as guides.
“In this chapter:
“(1) The term ‘program’ means the Defense Civilian Acquisition Training Corps of the Department of Defense.
“(2) The term ‘member of the program’ means a student at an institution of higher learning who is enrolled in the program.
“(3) The term ‘institution of higher education’ has the meaning given that term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).”.
(2) IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE.—
(A) INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than December 31, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan and schedule that implements the program at one institution of higher learning not later than August 1, 2020. The plan shall include recommendations regarding any legislative changes required for effective implementation of the program.
(B) EXPANSION.—Not later than December 31, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an expansion plan and schedule to expand the program to five locations not later than by August 1, 2021.
(C) FULL IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than December 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a full implementation plan and schedule to expand the program to at least 20 locations with not fewer than 400 members in the program not later than August 1, 2022.
(j) Clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering.—The laws of the United States are amended as follows:
(1) Section 129a(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(2) Section 133a(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “, including the allocation of resources for defense research and engineering,”.
(3) Section 134(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics,” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering,”.
(4) Section 139(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering”.
(5) Section 139(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering,”.
(6) Section 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in subsections (c) through (h) by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place it appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(7) Section 139a(d)(6) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering,”.
(8) Section 171(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in paragraph (3), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(9) Section 171a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(10) Subsection (d)(1) of section 181 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in subparagraph (C), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(11) Subsection (b)(2) of section 393 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(12) Section 1111 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1032; 10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(13) Section 231(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public law 110–181; 122 Stat. 45; 10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(14) Section 1702 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(15) Section 807(a) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2608; 10 U.S.C. 1702 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(16) Section 1705 of title 10, United Stats Code, is amended—
(A) in subsection (c), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(17) Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1825; 10 U.S.C. 1705 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(18) Section 1722 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(19) Section 1722a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(20) Section 1722b(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(21) Section 1723 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(22) Section 1725(e)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(23) Section 1735(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(24) Section 1737(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(25) Section 1741(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(26) Section 1746(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(27) Section 1748 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(28) Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(29) Section 217(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 770; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(30) Section 882(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 128 Stat. 4308; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(31) Section 2272 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering”.
(32) Section 2275(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering”.
(33) Section 2279(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(34) Section 2279b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(35) Section 898(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2000; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(36) Section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 726; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(37) Section 852 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 130 Stat. 3458; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(38) Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1487; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(39) Section 843 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1487; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(40) Section 254(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4402; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(41) Section 802(d) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2004; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(42) Section 244 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2498; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(43) Section 804(c) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2605; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(44) Section 2304 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(45) Section 895 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 954; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(46) Section 806(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4260; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(47) Section 821(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 226; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(48) Section 801(b)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 204; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(49) Section 817(e) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2326; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(50) Section 811(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 120 Stat. 2326; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(51) Section 875 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2310; 10 U.S.C. 2305 note) is amended—
(A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(B) in subsection (c), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(52) Section 888(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2322; 10 U.S.C. 2305 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(53) Section 829(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2281; 10 U.S.C. 2306 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(54) Section 2306b(i)(7) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(55) Section 2311(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(56) Section 824(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4269; 10 U.S.C. 2320 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(57) Section 2326(g) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(58) Section 2330 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(B) in subsection (a)(3), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(59) Section 882 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 942; 10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(60) Section 801(b)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1176; 10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(61) Section 2334 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(62) Section 2350a(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering”.
(63) Section 2359(b)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering”.
(64) Section 2359b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(66) Section 2375 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(67) Section 874(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2310; 10 U.S.C. 2375 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(68) Section 876 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2311; 10 U.S.C. 2377 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(69) Section 855 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 919; 10 U.S.C. 2377 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place such term appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(70) Section 856(a)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 920; 10 U.S.C. 2377 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(71) Section 2399(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics,” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering,”.
(72) Section 2419(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(73) Section 825(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 908; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(74) Section 826(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 908; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(75) Section 827(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 909; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(76) Section 811(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1828; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended—
(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “if the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “if the service acquisition executive, in the case of a major defense acquisition program of the military department, or the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in the case of a Defense-wide or Defense Agency major defense acquisition program,”; and
(77) Section 812(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1829; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(78) Section 814 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1467; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended—
(A) in subsection (b), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs:
“(2) REQUIRED MEMBERS.—Each Configuration Steering Board under this section shall include a representative of the following:
“(3) ADDITIONAL MEMBERS.—In addition to the members required in paragraph (2), when the milestone decision authority for a major defense acquisition program is the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, each Configuration Steering Board under this section shall also include a representative of the following:
(79) Section 801(a)(1) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2312; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(80) Section 924 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1576; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” each place it appears and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(81) Section 1675(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 192 Stat. 1131; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering”.
(82) Section 2431a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(83) Section 2435 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking—
(A) in subsection (b), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “service acquisition executive, in the case of a major defense acquisition program of a military department, or the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in the case of a Defense-wide or Defense Agency major defense acquisition program”; and
(84) Section 2438(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(85) Section 2448b(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by inserting “by an independent organization selected by the service acquisition executive” after “conducted”.
(86) Section 2503(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(87) Section 2508(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(88) Section 2521 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking “The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering”;
(89) Section 2533b(k)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(90) Section 2546 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in the heading of subsection (a), by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”;
(91) Section 2548 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(92) Section 2902(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(93) Section 2824(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2154; 10 U.S.C. 2911 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(94) Section 315(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1357; 10 U.S.C. 2911 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(95) Section 2926(e)(5)(D) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary for Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(96) Section 836(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1508; 22 U.S.C. 2767 note) is amended by striking “the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research,” and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering,”.
(97) Section 7103(d)(7)(M)(v) of title 22, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(98) Section 1126(a)(3) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(99) Section 11319(d)(4) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(100) Section 1302(b)(2)(A)(i) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(101) Section 809 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law 102–190; 105 Stat. 1423; 41 U.S.C. 1302 note) is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(102) Section 1311(b)(3) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(103) Section 98f(a)(3) of title 50, United States Code, is amended by striking “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(k) Requirements for the national security strategy for national technology and industrial base.—
(1) NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY FOR NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL BASE.—Section 2501(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentence: “The Secretary shall submit such strategy to Congress not later than 180 days after the date of submission of the national security strategy report required under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043).”.
(2) ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Section 2504(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting “executive order or” after “pursuant to”;
(l) Establishment of Center for Acquisition Innovation.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTER FOR ACQUISITION INNOVATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 97 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1746 the following new section:
Ҥ 1746a. Center for Acquisition Innovation
“(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall establish and maintain a Center for Acquisition Innovation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Center’) at the Naval Postgraduate School. The Center shall operate as an academic entity specializing in innovation relating to the defense acquisition system.
“(b) Mission.— (1) The mission of the Center is to provide to policymakers in the Department of Defense, Congress, and throughout the Government, academic analyses and policy alternatives for innovation in the defense acquisition system. The Center shall accomplish that mission by a variety of means intended to widely disseminate the research findings of the Center.
“(2) In carrying out the mission under paragraph (1), the Center shall, on an ongoing basis, review the statutes and regulations applicable to the defense acquisition system. The objective of such review is to provide policy alternatives for streamlining and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the defense acquisition process in order to ensure a defense technology advantage for the United States over potential adversaries.
“(c) Implementation review of Section 809 Panel recommendations and center policy alternatives.— (1) The Center shall, on an ongoing basis, review implementation of the recommendations of the Section 809 Panel and policy alternatives provided by the Center. As part of such review, the Center shall—
“(A) for recommendations or policy alternatives for the enactment of legislation, identify whether (or to what extent) the recommendations or policy alternatives have been adopted by being enacted into law by Congress;
“(B) for recommendations or policy alternatives for the issuance of regulations, identify whether (or to what extent) the recommendations or policy alternatives have been adopted through issuance of new agency or Government-wide regulations; and
“(C) for recommendations or policy alternatives for revisions to policies and procedures in the executive branch, identify whether (or to what extent) the recommendations or policy alternatives have been adopted through issuance of an appropriate implementing directive or other form of guidance.
“(2) In this subsection, the term ‘Section 809 Panel’ means the panel established by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 809 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92), as amended by section 863(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328) and sections 803(c) and 883 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91).
“(d) Funding.—There shall be available for the Center for any fiscal year from the Defense Acquisition Workforce and Development Fund not less than the amount of $3,000,000 (in fiscal year 2019 constant dollars), in addition to any other amount available for that fiscal year for the Naval Postgraduate School.
“(e) Annual report.— (1) Not later than September 30 each year, the Center shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, who shall forward to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives, a report describing the activities of the Center during the previous year and providing the findings, analysis, and policy alternatives of the Center relating to the defense acquisition system.
“(2) Each such report shall be submitted in accordance with paragraph (1) without further review within the executive branch.
(2) DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish the Center for Acquisition Innovation under section 1746a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), not later than March 1, 2020. The first Director of the Center shall be appointed not later than June 1, 2020, and the Center should be fully operational not later than June 1, 2021.
(3) IMPLEMENTATION REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 1, 2021, the head of the Center of Acquisition Innovation shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a report setting forth the organizational plan for the Center for Acquisition Innovation, the proposed budget for the Center, and the timetable for initial and full operations of the Center.
(B) TRANSMITTAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall transmit the report under paragraph (1), together with whatever comments the Secretary considers appropriate, to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives not later than February 1, 2021.
(4) RECORDS OF THE SECTION 809 PANEL.—
(A) TRANSFER AND MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS.—Following termination of the Section 809 Panel, the records of the panel shall be transferred to, and shall be maintained by, the Defense Technical Information Center. Such transfer shall be accomplished not later than August 1, 2019.
(B) STATUS OF RECORDS.—Working papers, records of interview, and any other draft work products generated for any purpose by the Section 809 Panel during its research are covered by the deliberative process privilege exemption under paragraph (5) of section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code.
(C) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term “Section 809 Panel” means the panel established by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 809 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92), as amended by section 863(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328) and sections 803(c) and 883 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91).
(a) In general.—Chapter 141 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2410t. Consideration of subcontracting to minority institutions
“(a) Consideration of subcontracting to minority institutions.—The Secretary of Defense shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to require that the system used by the Federal Government to monitor or record contractor past performance for a grant or contract awarded to an institution of higher education includes incentives for the award of a sub-grant or subcontract to minority institutions.
“(b) Minority institution defined.—In this section, the term ‘minority institution’ means—
“(1) a part B institution (as that term is defined in section 322(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1061(2)); or
“(2) any other institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1001)) at which not less than 50 percent of the total student enrollment consists of students from ethnic groups that are underrepresented in the fields of science and engineering.”.
(a) Clarifying amendment to the Small Business Runway Extension Act of 2018.—Section 3(a)(2)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)(C)) is amended by inserting “(including the Administration when acting pursuant to subparagraph (A))” after “no Federal department or agency”.
(b) Finalization of Small Business Runway Extension Act of 2018 rules.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall issue a final rule implementing the Small Business Runway Extension Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–324) not later than December 17, 2019.
(c) Amendment to size standards for certain small business concerns.—
(1) SIZE STANDARDS FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS PROVIDING SERVICES.—Section 3(a)(2)(C)(ii)(II) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)(C)(ii)(II)) is amended by striking “not less than”.
(2) SIZE STANDARDS FOR OTHER BUSINESS CONCERNS.—Section 3(a)(2)(C)(ii)(III) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)(C)(ii)(III)) is amended by striking “not less than 3 years” and inserting “5 years”.
(d) Transition plan for the Small Business Runway Extension Act of 2018.—
(1) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall implement a transition plan to assist business concerns and Federal agencies with compliance with the requirements of the Small Business Runway Extension Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–324).
(2) 3–YEAR CALCULATION FOR SIZE STANDARDS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The transition plan described under paragraph (1) shall include a requirement that, during the period beginning on December 17, 2018, and ending on the date that is 6 months after the date on which the Administrator issues final rules implementing the Small Business Runway Extension Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–324), allows the use of a 3-year calculation for a size standard to be applied to a business concern if the use of such 3-year calculation allows such concern to be considered a small business concern under section 3(a)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(1)).
(B) 3-YEAR CALCULATION DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “3-year calculation” means—
(a) Small business lower-tier subcontracting.—Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)) is amended—
(1) by amending paragraph (16) to read as follows:
“(16) CREDIT FOR CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN SUBCONTRACTORS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of determining whether or not a prime contractor has attained the percentage goals specified in paragraph (6)—
“(i) if the subcontracting goals pertain only to a single contract with the Federal agency, the prime contractor may elect to receive credit for small business concerns performing as first tier subcontractors or subcontractors at any tier pursuant to the subcontracting plans required under paragraph (6)(D) in an amount equal to the total dollar value of any subcontracts awarded to such small business concerns; and
“(B) COLLECTION AND REVIEW OF DATA ON SUBCONTRACTING PLANS.—The head of each contracting agency shall ensure that—
“(C) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to allow a Federal agency to establish a goaling requirement for a prime contractor eligible to receive credit under this paragraph that establishes an amount of subcontracts with a subcontractor that is not a first tier subcontractor for such prime contractor.”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(18) DISPUTE PROCESS FOR NON-PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS.—
“(A) NOTICE TO AGENCY.—With respect to a contract with a Federal agency, a subcontractor of a prime contractor on such contract may, if the subcontractor has not received payment for performance on such contract within 30 days of the completion of such performance, notify the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (hereinafter referred to as ‘OSDBU’) of the Federal agency and the prime contractor of such lack of payment.
“(B) AGENCY DETERMINATION.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Upon receipt of a notice described under subparagraph (A) and if such notice is provided to the agency within the 15-day period following the end the 30-day period described in subparagraph (A), the OSDBU shall verify whether such lack of payment has occurred and determine whether such lack of payment is due to an undue restriction placed on the prime contractor by an action of the Federal agency.
“(C) CURE PERIOD.—If the OSDBU verifies that the lack of payment under subparagraph (B) is not due to an action of the Federal agency, and the prime contractor has not provided verifying documentation described in subparagraph (B)(ii), the OSDBU shall notify the prime contractor and provide the prime contractor with a 15-day period in which the prime contractor may make the payment owed to the subcontractor.
“(D) RESULT OF NONPAYMENT.—If, after notifying the prime contractor under subparagraph (C), the OSDBU determines that the prime contractor has not fully paid the amount owed within the 15-day period described under subparagraph (C), the OSDBU shall ensure that such failure to pay is reflected in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting system (or any successor system).”.
(b) Maintenance of records with respect to credit under a subcontracting plan.—Section 8(d)(6) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(6)) is amended—
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (G) and (H) as subparagraphs (H) and (I), respectively (and conforming the margins accordingly); and
Section 15(h) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(h)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(4) BEST IN CLASS SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION REPORTING.—
“(A) ADDENDUM.—The Administrator, in addition to the requirements under paragraph (2), shall include in the report required by such paragraph, for each best in class designation—
Section 10 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 639) is amended by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
“(b) Cybersecurity reports.—
“(1) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, and every year thereafter, the Administrator shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that includes—
“(A) an assessment of the information technology (as defined in section 11101 of title 40, United States Code) and cybersecurity infrastructure of the Administration;
“(2) ADDITIONAL REPORTS.—If the Administrator determines that there is a reasonable basis to conclude that a cybersecurity risk or incident occurred at the Administration, the Administrator shall—
“(A) not later than 7 days after the date on which the Administrator makes that determination, notify the appropriate congressional committees of the cybersecurity risk or incident; and
“(B) not later than 30 days after the date on which the Administrator makes a determination under subparagraph (A)—
“(i) provide notice to individuals and small business concerns affected by the cybersecurity risk or incident; and
“(ii) submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, based on information available to the Administrator as of the date which the Administrator submits the report, that includes—
“(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to affect the reporting requirements of the Administrator under chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, in particular the requirement to notify the Federal information security incident center under section 3554(b)(7)(C)(ii) of such title, or any other provision of law.
Section 21 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(o) Cyber counseling certification program for lead small business development centers.—
“(1) CERTIFICATION PROGRAM.—The Administrator shall establish a cyber counseling certification program, or approve a similar existing program, to certify employees of lead small business development centers to provide cyber planning assistance to small business concerns.
“(2) NUMBER OF CERTIFIED EMPLOYEES.—The Administrator shall ensure that each lead small business development center has at least 1 employee, and not less than 10 percent of the total number of employees of the lead small business development center, certified in providing cyber planning assistance under this subsection.
“(3) CONSIDERATION OF SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER CYBER STRATEGY.—In carrying out this subsection, the Administrator, to the extent practicable, shall consider any cyber strategy methods included in the Small Business Development Center Cyber Strategy developed under section 1841(a)(3)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2662) and any cybersecurity outreach conducted pursuant to section 2209(l) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002.
“(4) REIMBURSEMENT FOR CERTIFICATION.—Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Administrator shall reimburse a lead small business development center in an amount not to exceed $350,000 in any fiscal year for costs relating to the certification of an employee of the lead small business development center under the program established under paragraph (1).
Subparagraph (B) of section 1908(b)(2) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by inserting “3131 to 3134,” after “sections”.
(a) Alignment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program and Small Business Technology Transfer Program of the Department of Defense with the National Defense Science and Technology Strategy.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and Secretaries of the military departments shall, to the extent practicable, align the research topics selected for activities conducted under the Small Business Innovation Research Program and Small Business Technology Transfer Program (as defined under section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638) with the National Defense Science and Technology Strategy established under section 218 of the John. S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1679).
(2) USE OF NATIONAL DEFENSE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY TO DETERMINE RESEARCH TOPICS.—Section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638) is amended—
(A) in subsection (g)(3)(B), by striking “, in the 1992 report” and all that follows through “that authority” and inserting “in the National Defense Science and Technology Strategy established under section 218 of the John. S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1679)”; and
(B) in subsection (o)(3)(B), by striking “, in accordance with section 2522 of title 10, United States Code” and inserting “in the National Defense Science and Technology Strategy established under section 218 of the John. S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1679)”.
(b) Pilot program for domestic investment under the SBIR program.—
(1) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the Administrator of the Small Business Administration should promulgate regulations to carry out the requirements under section 9(dd) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(dd)) that—
(A) permit small business concerns that are majority-owned by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms to participate in the SBIR program in accordance with such section;
(2) DOMESTIC INVESTMENT PILOT PROGRAM.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act and notwithstanding the requirements of section 9(dd) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(dd)), the Secretary of Defense shall create and administer a program to be known as the “Domestic Investment Pilot Program” under which the Secretary and the service acquisition executive for each military department may make a SBIR award to a small business concern that is majority-owned by multiple United States-owned venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms without providing the written determination described under paragraph (2) of such section 9(dd).
(B) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may award not more than 10 percent of the funds allocated for the SBIR program of the Department of Defense under section 9(f) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(f)) to small business concerns that are owned in majority part by multiple venture capital operating companies, hedge funds, or private equity firms through competitive, merit-based procedures that are open to all eligible small business concerns.
(C) EVALUATION CRITERIA.—In carrying out the Domestic Investment Pilot Program, the Secretary of Defense may not use investment of venture capital or investment from hedge funds or private equity firms as a criterion for the award of contracts under the SBIR program or STTR program.
(D) ANNUAL REPORTING.—The Secretary of Defense shall include as part of each annual report required under section 9(b)(7) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(9)(b)(7)) )—
(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:
(A) SBIR.—The term “SBIR” has the meaning given in section 9(e) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(e)).
(B) SMALL BUSINESS ACT DEFINITIONS.—The terms “small business concern”, “venture capital operating company”, “hedge fund”, and “private equity firm” have the meanings given those terms, respectively, in section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).
(c) Cybersecurity technical assistance for SBIR and STTR programs.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into an agreement with 1 or more vendors selected under section (9)(q)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(q)(2)) to provide small business concerns engaged in SBIR or STTR projects with cybersecurity technical assistance , such as access to a network of cybersecurity experts and engineers engaged in designing and implementing cybersecurity practices.
(2) AMOUNTS.—In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense may provide the amounts described under section (9)(q)(3) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 638(q)(3)) to a recipient that meets the eligibility requirements under the applicable subparagraph, if the recipient requests to seek cybersecurity technical assistance from an individual or entity other than a vendor selected as described in paragraph (1).
(d) Phase 0 proof of concept partnership program for the Department of Defense.—Section 9(jj) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “The Director of the National Institutes of Health” and inserting “A covered agency head”;
(e) Modification to the Defense Research and Development Rapid Innovation Program.—
(1) INCREASE TO FUNDING.—Section 2359a(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “$3,000,000” and inserting “$6,000,000”.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the program established under section 2359a(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, (commonly known as the “Defense Research and Development Rapid Innovation Program”), which shall include—
(A) with respect to the two fiscal years preceding the submission of the report—
(ii) the percent of funds made available under the program for Small Business Innovation Research Program projects; and
(iii) a list of Small Business Innovation Research Program projects that received funding under the program that were included in major defense acquisition programs (as defined in section 2430 of title 10, United States Code) and other defense acquisition programs that meet critical national security needs; and
(f) Establishment of joint reserve detachments at Defense Innovation Unit.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall establish not fewer than three joint reserve detachments (referred to in this section as “Detachments”) at locations of the Defense Innovation Unit—
(2) COMPOSITION.—Each Detachment shall be composed of members of the reserve components who possess relevant private sector experience in the fields of business, acquisition, intelligence, engineering, technology transfer, science, mathematics, contracting, procurement, logistics, cyberspace security, or such other fields as are determined to be relevant by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering.
(3) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Detachments shall have the following responsibilities:
(A) Each Detachment shall provide the Department of Defense with expertise, analysis, alternatives for innovation, and opportunities for greater engagement and collaboration between the defense innovation ecosystem and commercial industry.
(B) Each Detachment shall, on an ongoing basis—
(i) recruit, retain, and employ members of the reserve components who possess relevant private sector experience, as described in paragraph (2);
(ii) partner with the military services, the combatant commands, and other Department of Defense organizations to seek and rapidly prototype advanced commercial solutions while lowering the barrier to entry to serve defense requirements;
(iii) increase awareness of—
(II) the technology requirements of the Department of Defense as identified in the National Defense Science and Technology Strategy developed under section 218 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1679);
(g) Modification to Department of Defense SBIR Expenditures.—Section 9(f) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(f)) is amended—
(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of Defense may authorize the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command to use not more than 5 percent of the funds required to be expended by the Department of Defense under section 9(f)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(f)(1)) for a pilot program to increase participation by small business concerns in the development of technology-enhanced capabilities for special operations forces.
(b) Use of partnership intermediary.—
(1) AUTHORIZATION.—The Commander of the United States Special Operations Command may modify an existing agreement with a partnership intermediary to assist the Commander in carrying out the pilot program under this section, including with respect to the award of Small Business Innovation Research Program contracts, Small Business Technology Transfer Program contracts, and other contracts and agreements to small business concerns.
(c) Report.—Not later than October 1, 2020, and October 1, 2021, the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a report describing any agreement with a partnership intermediary entered into pursuant to this section. The report shall include, for each such agreement, the amount of funds obligated, an identification of the recipient of such funds, and a description of the use of such funds.
(d) Termination.—The authority to carry out a pilot program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2021.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) PARTNERSHIP INTERMEDIARY.—The term “partnership intermediary” has the meaning given the term in section 23(c) of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3715(c)).
(2) SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN.—The term “small business concern” has the meaning given the term under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).
(3) SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH PROGRAM.—The term “Small Business Innovation Research Program” has the meaning given the term in section 9(e)(4) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(e)).
(4) SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM.—The term “Small Business Technology Transfer Program” has the meaning given the term in section 9(e)(5) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638(e)).
(a) Authorized official.—Effective October 1, 2021, section 2411(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Director of Defense Logistics Agency” and inserting “Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment”.
(b) Report and briefing.—Not later than November 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a written report and briefing on the activities carried out in preparation for the transition of responsibilities for carrying out the procurement technical assistance cooperative agreement program under chapter 142 of title 10, United States Code, from the Director of Defense Logistics Agency to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, as required by subsection (a).
(c) Annual budget justification documents.—Not later than February 1, 2022, and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a budget justification display that includes the procurement technical assistance cooperative agreement program under chapter 142 of title 10, United States Code, as part of the budget justification for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide for the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(a) Permanent authorization.—Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking subsection (j).
(b) Office of Small Business Programs oversight.—Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (m) the following new subsection:
“(n) Establishment of performance goals and periodic reviews.—The Office of Small Business Programs of the Department of Defense shall—
(c) Modification of disadvantaged small business concern definition.—Subsection (o)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note), as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is amended by striking “has less than half the size standard corresponding to its primary North American Industry Classification System code” and inserting “is not more than the size standard corresponding to its primary North American Industry Classification System code”.
(d) Removal of pilot program references.—Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(e) Independent report on program effectiveness.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Business Board to submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating the effectiveness of the Mentor-Protege Program established under section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note), including recommendations for improving the program in terms of performance metrics, forms of assistance, and overall program effectiveness not later than March 31, 2022.
(a) In general.—Before the award of a final contract to a commercial e-commerce portal provider pursuant to section 846 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 41 U.S.C. 1901 note), the Administrator of General Services shall establish a five-year program to test the three models for commercial e-commerce portals identified in section 4.1 of “Procurement Through Commercial E-Commerce Portals Phase II Report: Market Research & Consultation” issued by the Administrator in April 2019.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that any equipment or products purchased for major defense acquisition programs (as defined in section 2430 of title 10, United States Code) should be manufactured in the United States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States, and that any such equipment or products purchased by any entity of the Department of Defense should be American-made, provided that American-made equipment and products are of a quality similar to that of competitive offers and are available in a timely manner to meet mission requirements.
(b) In general.—Chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2436 the following new section:
Ҥ 2436a. Major defense acquisition programs: report and database on items manufactured in the United States
“(a) Report.—Beginning not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an annual report on the percentage of any items procured in connection with a major defense acquisition program that are manufactured in the United States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States.
(a) Inapplicability of termination of report submittal to Congress.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Selected Acquisition Reports required by section 2432 of title 10, United States Code, shall not constitute reports covered by subsection (b) of section 1080 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1000; 10 U.S.C. 111 note), and their submittal to Congress as required by such section 2432 shall not be terminated by operation of subsection (a) of such section 1080.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Effective on December 30, 2021, section 1051(x) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1567) is amended by striking paragraph (4).
(b) Form of Selected Acquisition Reports.—Section 2432 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(c) Report on alternative methodology.—The Secretary of Defense shall include with the budget for fiscal year 2021, as submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a report proposing an alternative methodology for providing status reports on major defense acquisition programs and other acquisition activities, including programs carried out under section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note), where such status reports shall include information on—
(1) scheduled and completed cybersecurity tests of software acquired through a program covered by the status report, including assessments on cooperative vulnerability and penetration and adversarial assessments;
(d) Guidance on cybersecurity tests.—With respect to cybersecurity tests included in the alternative methodology report described in subsection (c)(1), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, shall develop policies on the selection of cybersecurity tests, methods to consistently describe the cybersecurity tests, and methods to associate cybersecurity tests with a component part of a system or a version of the software tested.
(a) In general.—Section 862 of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–181; 125 Stat. 1521; 10 U.S.C. note prec. 2191) is amended—
Subsection (e) of section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (44 U.S.C. 3601 note) is amended by striking “2020” and inserting “2022”.
(a) Limitation on certain rail rolling stock procurements.—Section 5323 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(u) Limitation on certain rail rolling stock procurements.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (5), financial assistance made available under this chapter shall not be used in awarding a contract or subcontract to an entity on or after the date of enactment of this subsection for the procurement of rail rolling stock for use in public transportation if the manufacturer of the rail rolling stock—
“(B) is owned or controlled by, is a subsidiary of, or is otherwise related legally or financially to a corporation based in a country that—
“(i) is identified as a nonmarket economy country (as defined in section 771(18) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(18))) as of the date of enactment of this subsection;
“(ii) was identified by the United States Trade Representative in the most recent report required by section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2242) as a priority foreign country under subsection (a)(2) of that section; and
“(iii) is subject to monitoring by the Trade Representative under section 306 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2416).
“(2) EXCEPTION.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘otherwise related legally or financially’ does not include a minority relationship or investment.
“(3) INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.—This subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the obligations of the United States under international agreements.
“(4) CERTIFICATION FOR RAIL ROLLING STOCK.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (5), as a condition of financial assistance made available in a fiscal year under section 5337, a recipient that operates rail fixed guideway service shall certify in that fiscal year that the recipient will not award any contract or subcontract for the procurement of rail rolling stock for use in public transportation with a rail rolling stock manufacturer described in paragraph (1).
“(5) EXCEPTION.—This subsection, including the certification requirement under paragraph (4), shall not apply to the award of a contract or subcontract made by a public transportation agency with a rail rolling stock manufacturer described in paragraph (1) if the manufacturer and the public transportation agency have a contract for rail rolling stock that was executed before the date of enactment of this subsection.”.
(b) Cybersecurity certification for rail rolling stock and operations.—Section 5323 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(v) Cybersecurity certification for rail rolling stock and operations.—
“(1) CERTIFICATION.—As a condition of financial assistance made available under this chapter, a recipient that operates a rail fixed guideway public transportation system shall certify that the recipient has established a process to develop, maintain, and execute a written plan for identifying and reducing cybersecurity risks.
“(2) COMPLIANCE.—For the process required under paragraph (1), a recipient of assistance under this chapter shall—
“(A) utilize the approach described by the voluntary standards and best practices developed under section 2(c)(15) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 272(c)(15)), as applicable;
“(3) LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to interfere with the authority of—
(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided under subsections (c), (d), and (e), the Department of Defense may not enter into a contract for the procurement of goods or services with any person that has business operations with an authority of the Government of Venezuela that is not recognized as the legitimate Government of Venezuela by the United States Government.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) BUSINESS OPERATIONS.—The term “business operations” means engaging in commerce in any form, including acquiring, developing, maintaining, owning, selling, possessing, leasing, or operating equipment, facilities, personnel, products, services, personal property, real property, or any other apparatus of business or commerce.
(2) GOVERNMENT OF VENEZUELA.— (A) The term “Government of Venezuela” includes the government of any political subdivision of Venezuela, and any agency or instrumentality of the Government of Venezuela.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term “agency or instrumentality of the Government of Venezuela” means an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in section 1603(b) of title 28, United States Code, with each reference in such section to “a foreign state” deemed to be a reference to “Venezuela”.
(3) PERSON.—The term “person” means—
(A) a natural person, corporation, company, business association, partnership, society, trust, or any other nongovernmental entity, organization, or group;
(B) any governmental entity or instrumentality of a government, including a multilateral development institution (as defined in section 1701(c)(3) of the International Financial Institutions Act (22 U.S.C. 262r(c)(3))); and
(c) Exceptions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The prohibition under subsection (a) does not apply to a contract that the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State jointly determine—
(2) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate of any contract entered into on the basis of an exception provided for under paragraph (1).
(d) Office of foreign assets control licenses.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to a person that has a valid license to operate in Venezuela issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
(a) Duties and powers of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment.—Section 133b(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), (6), and (7) as paragraphs (5), (6), (7), and (8), respectively;
(a) Assistant Secretary of the Army.—Section 7016(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(b) Assistant Secretary of the Navy.—Section 8016(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense may be used to consolidate the Defense Media Activity until a period of 180 days has elapsed following the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Study.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study to identify each form and survey of the Department of Defense, in use on the date of the enactment of this Act, that contains a term or classification that the Secretary determines may be considered racially or ethnically insensitive.
(b) Reports.—
(1) INTERIM REPORTS.—On the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and on the date that is 180 days after such date of enactment, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the status of the study conducted under subsection (a).
(a) Establishment.—Part I of subtitle D of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new chapter:
“Sec.
“9091. Establishment of the Space Corps.
“9093. Commandant of the Space Corps.
“9095. Officer career field for space.
Ҥ 9091. Establishment of the Space Corps
“(a) Establishment.—There is established a United States Space Corps as an armed force within the Department of the Air Force.
“(b) Composition.— (1) The Space Corps shall be composed of the following:
“(2) (A) The space forces specified in paragraph (1)(B) shall include the personnel and assets of the Air Force transferred to the Space Corps pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020.
“(B) The space forces specified in paragraph (1)(B) may not include the personnel or assets of the National Reconnaissance Office or the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. Nothing in this section shall affect the authorities, duties, or responsibilities of the Director of the National Reconnaissance Office and the Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, including with respect to the authority of each such Director to—
“(e) Acquisition system.— (1) The Secretary of the Air Force may establish a separate, alternative acquisition system for defense space acquisitions, including with respect to procuring space vehicles, ground segments relating to such vehicles, and satellite terminals, pursuant to the plan specified in paragraph (2).
“(2) The Deputy Secretary of Defense shall develop the plan, and submit such plan to the congressional defense committees, under section 1601(b) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2103).
“(3) The alternative acquisition system under paragraph (1) shall cover defense space acquisitions except with respect to the National Reconnaissance Office and other elements of the Department of Defense that are elements of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)).
“(f) Personnel development.— (1) The Secretary may ensure the quality of the members of the Space Corps pursuant to the plan specified in paragraph (2) and section 9095 of this title.
“(2) The Secretary shall develop the plan, and submit such plan to the congressional defense committees, under section 1601(c) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2103).
“(3) In carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall address the following:
“(A) Managing the career progression of members of the Space Corps and civilian employees of the Space Corps throughout the military or civilian career of the member or the employee, as the case may be, including with respect to—
Ҥ 9093. Commandant of the Space Corps
“(a) Appointment.— (1) There is a Commandant of the Space Corps, appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, from the general officers of the Air Force. The Commandant serves at the pleasure of the President.
“(b) Grade.—The Commandant, while so serving, has the grade of general without vacating the permanent grade of the officer.
“(c) Relationship to the Secretary of the Air Force.—Except as otherwise prescribed by law and subject to section 9013(f) of this title, the Commandant performs the duties of such position under the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force and is directly responsible to the Secretary.
“(d) Duties.—Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Air Force, the Commandant shall—
“(e) Joint Chiefs of Staff.— (1) The Commandant shall also perform the duties prescribed for the Commandant as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under section 151 of this title.
“(2) To the extent that such action does not impair the independence of the Commandant in the performance of the duties of the Commandant as a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commandant shall inform the Secretary of the Air Force regarding military advice rendered by members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on matters affecting the Department of the Air Force.
(d) Conforming amendments.—
(1) JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.—
(2) OFFICER CAREERS.—Chapter 907 of such title is amended as follows:
(A) In section 9084, by striking “officers in the Air Force” and inserting “officers in the Space Corps”.
(a) Transfers.—
(1) TRANSFER OF MILITARY PERSONNEL.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, during the transition period, transfer all covered military personnel to the Space Corps.
(B) RETENTION IN GRADE AND STATUS.—Covered military personnel transferred to the Space Corps pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall retain the grade and date of obtaining such grade that the individual person had before the date of the transfer unless otherwise altered or terminated in accordance with law.
(2) TRANSFER OF FUNCTIONS.—Except as otherwise directed by the Secretary of Defense, all functions, assets, and obligations of the space elements of the Air Force (including all property, records, installations, activities, facilities, agencies, and projects of such elements) shall be transferred to the Space Corps.
(b) Conforming repeal.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 2279c.
(c) Notice to Congress.—Not later than 30 days before the date on which the transition period terminates, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification that identifies the date on which transition period will terminate.
(a) Report on structure of Space Corps.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a detailed plan for the organizational structure of the Space Corps.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) a detailed description of the structure and organizational elements required for the Space Corps to perform its mission;
(B) a detailed description of the organization and staff required to support the Commandant of the Space Corps;
(C) a detailed explanation of how establishment of the Space Corps is expected to affect the composition and function of the space elements of the Armed Forces;
(b) Report on military personnel.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the military personnel requirements of the Space Corps.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(B) the number of officer and enlisted personnel to be transferred or reassigned to the Space Corps by functional area;
(c) Report on civilian personnel.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the civilian personnel requirements of the Space Corps.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) an assessment of the projected size of the civilian workforce of the Space Corps in fiscal year 2021 and in each fiscal year covered by the most recent future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code;
(d) Report on transfer of functions and assets.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a detailed plan for the transfer of the functions, assets, and obligations of the space elements of the Armed Forces (including any property, records, installations, activities, facilities, agencies, and projects of such elements) to the Space Corps in accordance with section 922.
(e) Report on funding requirements.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the funding requirements for the Space Corps.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include a detailed estimate of the funding that will be required to establish the Space Corps and to conduct the activities and operations of the Corps, including estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025 as follows:
(B) With respect to research, development, test, and evaluation accounts—
(C) With respect to operation and maintenance accounts—
(D) With respect to military personnel accounts—
(E) With respect to each project under military construction accounts (including with respect to unspecified minor military construction and amounts for planning and design), the country, location, project title, and project amount by fiscal year.
(F) With respect to any expenditures and proposed appropriations not included the materials submitted under subparagraphs (A) through (E), an explanation with a level of detail equivalent to or greater than the level of detail provided in the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
The Secretary of Defense may not transfer any personnel or resources from any reserve components, including the National Guard, to the Space Corps established by section 921 until the date on which a Space National Guard of the United States has been established by law.
(a) Restoration of general authority for establishment of unified command.—
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 6 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 169.
(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 2273a(d)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “The Commander of the United States Strategic Command, acting through the United States Space Command,” and inserting “The Commander of the United States Space Command, or, if no such command exists, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command,”.
(a) Authority to transfer authorizations.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2019 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(b) Limitations.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—
(c) Additional limitation on transfers for drug interdiction and counter drug activities.—The authority provided by subsection (a) may not be used to transfer any amount to Drug Interdiction and Counter Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
(d) Effect on authorization amounts.—A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.
(e) Notice to congress.—The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).
(f) Certification requirement.—The authority to transfer any authorization under this section may not be used until the Secretary of Defense and the head of each entity affected by such transfer submits to the congressional defense committees certification in writing that—
Section 240b(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)(B)(iv), by adding at the end the following new subclause:
(2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Such briefing shall also include a description of any updates to the defense business systems roadmap referred to in paragraph (1)(B)(iv)(IV).”; and
(3) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
(a) Elements of annual report.—Subsection (b)(1)(B) of section 240b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Semiannual briefings.—Subsection (b)(2) of such section is amended by striking “or audit remediation”.
(c) Audit remediation services.—Subsection (b) of such section is further amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)(B), by adding at the end the following new clauses:
“(ix) If less than 50 percent of the audit remediation services under contract, as described in the briefing required under paragraph (2)(B), are being performed by individual professionals meeting the qualifications described in suhsection (c), a detailed description of the risks associated with the risks of the acquisition strategy of the Department with respect to conducting audit remediation activities and an explanation of how the strategy complies with the policies expressed by Congress.
“(x) If less than 25 percent of the audit remediation services under contract, as described in the briefing required under paragraph (2)(B), are being performed by individual professionals meeting the qualifications described in subsection (c), a written certification that the staffing ratio complies with commercial best practices and presents no increased risk of delay in the Department’s ability to achieve a clean audit opinion.”; and
(2) in paragraph (2)—
(B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(B) Not later than January 31 and June 30 each year, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the comptrollers of the military departments shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees on the status of the corrective action plan. Such briefing shall include both the absolute number and percentage of personnel performing the amount of audit remediation services being performed by professionals meeting the qualifications described in subsection (c).”.
(d) Selection of audit remediation services.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Selection of audit remediation services.—The selection of audit remediation service providers shall be based, among other appropriate criteria, on qualifications, relevant experience, and capacity to develop and implement corrective action plans to address internal control and compliance deficiencies identified during a financial statement or program audit.”.
(a) Annual report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 9A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 240g. Annual report on auditable financial statements
“(a) In general.—Not later than January 30 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report ranking each of the military departments and Defense Agencies in order of how advanced they are in achieving auditable financial statements as required by law. In preparing the report, the Secretary shall seek to exclude information that is otherwise available in other reports to Congress.
“(b) Bottom quartile.—Not later than June 30 of each year, the head of each of the military departments and Defense Agencies that were ranked in the bottom quartile of the report submitted under subsection (a) for that year shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following information for that military department or Defense Agency:
(b) Limitation on use of funds.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act for travel of persons for the head of a military department or Defense Agency described in subsection (b) of section 240g of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), for fiscal year 2020, not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended before the submittal of the report required under that subsection for that military department or Defense Agency.
(c) Plan for achieving unmodified audit opinion on consolidated audit.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the plan of the Secretary for achieving an unmodified audit opinion of the Department of Defense-wide consolidated audit by not later than five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, Office of the Secretary of Defense, for Travel of Persons for fiscal year 2020, not more than 70 percent may be obligated or expended before the date on which the Secretary submits the report required under paragraph (1).
(a) In general.—Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 225 the following new section:
Ҥ 226. Special operations forces: display of service-common and other support and enabling capabilities
“(a) In general.—The Secretary shall include, in the budget materials submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31 for fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year, a consolidated budget justification display showing service-common and other support and enabling capabilities for special operations forces requested by a military service or Defense Agency. Such budget justification display shall include any amount for service-common or other capability development and acquisition, training, operations, pay, base operations sustainment, and other common services and support.
“(b) Service-common and other support and enabling capabilities.—In this section, the term ‘service-common and other support and enabling capabilities’ means capabilities provided in support of special operations that are not reflected in Major Force Program-11 or designated as special operations forces-peculiar.”.
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each major implementation of, or modification to, a financial system of the Department of Defense is reviewed by an independent public accountant to validate that such financial system will meet any applicable Federal requirements.
(a) Types of support.—Paragraph (7) of subsection (b) of section 284 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Congressional notification.—Subsection (h)(1) of such section is amended—
(2) by inserting before subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, the following new subparagraph (A):
“(A) In case of support for a purpose described in subsection (b)—
“(v) an assessment of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of such support in advancing the objectives and strategy of the department or agency to which the support will be provided;
Section 1014 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328) is amended—
Section 901 of the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–469; 32 U.S.C. 112 note) is amended—
Section 2631 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by inserting “or for a Defense Agency” after “Marine Corps”; and
Pursuant to section 2218(f)(3) of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts authorized to be appropriated for Operation and Maintenance, Navy, for fiscal year 2020, the Secretary of the Navy shall seek to enter into a contract for the procurement of two used vessels.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that there is a formal schoolhouse available at which training is provided in any shipboard system that is program of record on Navy surface vessels.
(b) Timline for implementation.—
(1) CURRENT PROGRAMS.—In the case of any shipboard system program of record that is in use as of the date of the enactment of this Act for which no formal schoolhouse is available, the Secretary shall ensure that such a schoolhouse is available for the provision of training in such program by not later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) FUTURE PROGRAMS.—In the case of any shipboard system program of record that is first used after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall ensure that a formal schoolhouse is established for the provision of training in such program by not later than 12 months after the date on which the shipboard system program of record is first used.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on shipbuilder training and hiring requirements necessary to achieve the Navy’s 30-year shipbuilding plan and to maintain the shipbuilding readiness of the defense industrial base. Such report shall include each of the following:
(1) An analysis and estimate of the time and investment required for new shipbuilders to gain proficiency in particular shipbuilding occupational specialties, including detailed information about the occupational specialty requirements necessary for construction of naval surface ship and submarine classes to be included in the Navy’s 30-year shipbuilding plan.
(2) An analysis of the age demographics and occupational experience level (measured in years of experience) of the shipbuilding defense industrial workforce.
(3) An analysis of the potential time and investment challenges associated with developing and retaining shipbuilding skills in organizations that lack intermediate levels of shipbuilding experience.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (b) of section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 271 note) is amended by striking “2020” and inserting “2022”.
(b) Technical corrections.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following paragraph (2):
“(2) For purposes of applying the definition of transnational organized crime under paragraph (1) to this section, the term ‘illegal means’, as it appears in such definition, includes the trafficking of money, human trafficking, illicit financial flows, illegal trade in natural resources and wildlife, trade in illegal drugs and weapons, and other forms of illegal means determined by the Secretary of Defense.”.
No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2020, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release of any individual detained in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the custody or control of any country, or any entity within such country, as follows:
(a) Prohibition on use of funds.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2020, to—
(1) detain or provide assistance relating to the detention of any individual, including any United States citizen, pursuant to the law of war or a proceeding under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; or
(2) transfer or provide assistance relating to the transfer of any individual, including any United States citizen, for the purpose of detaining such individual pursuant to the law of war or a proceeding under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(b) Exception.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to an individual who is or was detained pursuant to the law of war or a Military Commissions Act proceeding on or after May 2, 2018, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.
(c) Disposition plan.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan identifying a disposition, other than continued law of war detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for each individual detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, are aging, and such individuals are increasingly subject to a number of health conditions exacerbated by age and the circumstances of their cases.
(2) Expeditionary medical treatment of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is logistically challenging and increasingly costly, especially treatment related to complex ailments that may become exacerbated with age.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States has an ongoing obligation to provide medical care to individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, meeting appropriate standards of care; and
(2) the Secretary of Defense should take into account the standards of care provided at other relevant facilities, including those administered by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in determining the policies of the Department of Defense regarding the provision of medical care to individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a nonprofit entity or a federally funded research and development center independent of the Department of Defense to conduct research and analysis on the intersection of gender and violent extremism and terrorism.
(b) Elements.—The research and analysis conducted under subsection (a) shall include research and analysis of the following:
(1) The root and proximate causes of women’s participation in terrorist and violent extremist organizations.
(2) Ways for the Department of Defense to engage women and girls who are vulnerable to extremist and terrorist behavior.
(3) Ways women and girls can assist the Armed Forces and partner military organizations in identifying individuals of concern.
(4) The intersection of violent extremism and terrorism and the following:
(c) Utilization.—The Secretary of Defense shall utilize the results of the research conducted under subsection (a) to inform each geographic combatant command’s strategy report and individual country strategy reports, where appropriate.
(d) Reports.—
(1) REPORT TO SECRETARY.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the nonprofit entity or federally funded research and development center with which the Secretary of Defense enters into contract under subsection (a) shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a report that contains the assessment required by subsection (a).
(a) In general.—Chapter 2 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 120. Department of Defense executive aircraft controlled by Secretaries of military departments
“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Chief of the Air Force Special Air Mission Office is given the responsibility for scheduling all Department of Defense executive aircraft controlled by the Secretaries of the military departments.
“(b) Responsibilities.— (1) The Secretary of each of the military departments shall ensure that there is representation from each of the armed forces within the Air Force Special Air Mission Office to provide for daily management and scheduling of the aircraft controlled by that military department.
“(c) Limitations.— (1) The Secretary of Defense may not establish a new command and control organization to support aircraft controlled by the Secretary of a military department.
(a) Roles, responsibilities, and authorities.—Subsection (b) of section 2284 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “such as weapon systems, manned and unmanned vehicles and platforms, cyber and communication equipment, and the integration of explosive ordnance disposal sets, kits and outfits and explosive ordnance disposal tools, equipment, sets, kits, and outfits developed by the department.” and inserting “; and”; and
Section 1055(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(5) SUSTAINMENT COSTS.—If the Secretary determines that sustainment costs will be incurred as a result of the provision of defense sensitive support, the Secretary, not later than 72 hours after the initial provision of such support, shall certify to the congressional defense committees (and the congressional intelligence committees with respect to matters relating to members of the intelligence community) that such sustainment costs will not interfere with the ability of the Department to execute operations, accomplish mission objectives, and maintain readiness.”.
(a) Authority.—Subsection (a) of section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 986; 10 U.S.C. 271 note prec.) is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Authority.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may provide assistance to United States Customs and Border Protection for purposes of increasing ongoing efforts to secure the southern land border of the United States in accordance with the requirements of this section.
“(2) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—If the Secretary of Defense provides assistance under paragraph (1), not later than 30 days before the provision of such assistance, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives certification, in writing, that—
“(A) the provision of the assistance will not negatively affect military training, operations, readiness, or other military requirement, including the readiness of the National Guard and reserve components; and
“(3) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 30 days before the deployment of any member of the Armed Forces or unit of the Armed Forces to the southern land border of the United States in support United States Customs and Border Protection pursuant to this section or any other provision of law, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Forces of the Senate and House of Representatives notice of such deployment.”.
(b) Support.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended—
(c) Reporting requirements.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended to read as follows:
“(f) Reports.—
“(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which any member of the Armed Forces is deployed along the southern land border of the United States at the request of the Secretary of Homeland Security, and every 90 days thereafter until no members are so deployed, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives a report that includes, for both the period covered by the report and the total period of the deployment, each of the following:
“(B) An identification of any training exercises that were planned prior to such deployment that included deployed units and were planned to be executed after the date of the deployment.
“(C) For each unit so deployed, the readiness rating of the unit before deployment and 15 days after the last day of such deployment.
“(D) The projected length of the deployment and any special pay and incentives for which deployed personnel may qualify during the deployment.
“(E) A description of any specific pre-deployment training provided to any individual or unit before being so deployed, including the location and duration of any such training.
“(G) A description of the life support conditions, including living quarters and food ration cycles, associated with such deployment and associated costs.
“(I) A map indicating the locations where units so deployed are conducting their assigned mission and an explanation for the choice of such locations.
“(J) A description of the specific missions and tasks, by location, that are assigned to the members of the Armed Forces who are so deployed.
“(K) The total amount of funds obligated or expended to provide support along the southern border of the United States, including costs associated with personnel (set forth separately from any special pay and allowances), transportation, operations, and any materials used in support of any such deployment or support provided.
“(L) An assessment of the ongoing efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the provision of such assistance, including a comparison to the execution by United States Customs and Border Protection, the strategy and recommendations of the Secretary to address the challenges on the southern border of the United States and to enhance the effectiveness of such assistance, and a plan to transition the functions performed by the members of the Armed Forces pursuant to such assistance.
“(M) The justification of United States Customs and Border Protection determining each location where the Department of Defense provides support under this section and any actions taken by the Department of Homeland Security to complete the mission or tasks before requesting support from the Department of Defense and determining when support from the Department of Defense is needed, including—
“(i) copies of any relevant documents that describe the factors taken into consideration in requesting support from the Department of Defense;
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 may be obligated or expended for the inactivation of any Army watercraft unit until the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress certification that—
(a) Prohibition.—National defense funds may not be obligated, expended, or otherwise used to design or carry out a project to construct, replace, or modify a wall, fence, or other physical barrier along the international border between the United States and Mexico.
(b) National defense funds defined.—In this section, the term “national defense funds” means—
(1) amounts authorized to be appropriated for any purpose in this division or authorized to be appropriated in division A of any National Defense Authorization Act for any of fiscal years 2015 through 2019, including any amounts of such an authorization made available to the Department of Defense and transferred to another authorization by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to transfer authority available to the Secretary; and
(a) In general.—Subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of Defense may expend amounts made available for the Military Intelligence Program for any of fiscal years 2020 through 2025 for intelligence and counterintelligence activities for any purpose the Secretary determines to be proper with regard to intelligence and counterintelligence objects of a confidential, extraordinary, or emergency nature. Such a determination is final and conclusive upon the accounting officers of the United States.
(b) Limitation on amount.—The Secretary of Defense may not expend more than five percent of the amounts described in subsection (a) for any fiscal year for objects described in that subsection unless—
(c) Certification.—For each expenditure of funds under this section, the Secretary shall certify that such expenditure was made for an object of a confidential, extraordinary, or emergency nature.
(d) Report.—Not later than December 31 of each of 2020 through 2025, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees a report on expenditures made under this section during the fiscal year preceding the year in which the report is submitted. Each such report shall include, for each expenditure under this section during the fiscal year covered by the report, a description, the purpose, the program element, and the certification required under section (c).
(a) In general.—None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be used to house a child separated from a parent.
(b) Child separated from a parent.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this section, a child shall not be considered to be separated from a parent if the separation is conducted by an agent or officer of Customs and Border Protection at or near a port of entry or within 100 miles of a border of the United States, and one of the following has occurred:
(A) A State court, authorized under State law, terminates the rights of the parent or legal guardian, determines that it is in the best interests of the child to be removed from the parent or legal guardian, in accordance with the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (Public Law 105–89), or makes any similar determination that is legally authorized under State law.
(B) An official from the State or county child welfare agency with expertise in child trauma and development makes a best interests determination that it is in the best interests of the child to be removed from the parent or legal guardian because the child is in danger of abuse or neglect at the hands of the parent or legal guardian, or is a danger to herself or others.
(C) The separation is authorized based on—
(i) the finding of a chief patrol agent or the area port director in an official and undelegated capacity that—
(I) the child is a victim of trafficking or is at significant risk of becoming a victim of trafficking;
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used to provide assistance to the Department of Health and Human Services for the purpose of providing housing for unaccompanied alien children unless the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress certification that—
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “unaccompanied alien children” has the meaning given such term in section 462 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279)).
This subtitle may be cited as the “National Defense Strategy Implementation Act”.
Not later than February 1, 2020, and then biannually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Department of Defense’s operational concepts and plans regarding strategic competitors, including on strategically significant matters identified in the National Defense Strategy, that also addresses each of the following:
(1) Ways of employing the force in peace time to effectively deter strategic competitors below the threshold of war while ensuring readiness for potential conflict.
(2) Ways of adapting innovative, operational concepts needed for strategically significant and plausible scenarios related to strategic competitors.
(3) Ways of addressing operational challenges related to achieving the strategic advantage against strategic competitors related to nuclear, space, cyber, conventional, and unconventional means in warfighting doctrine.
(4) The technologies, force developments, posture and capabilities, readiness, infrastructure, organization, personnel, and other elements of the defense program necessary to enable these operational concepts and its implementation listed in paragraphs (1) through (3).
(5) The ability of the National Security Innovation Base to support the operational concepts listed in paragraphs (1) through (3).
(6) The resources and defense investments necessary to support the operational concepts and its implementation, including budget recommendations.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Director of the Joint Staff, and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, in consultation with the head of each military service, to jointly develop and implement a plan to strengthen the analytic capabilities, expertise, and processes necessary to meet the National Defense Strategy.
(b) Elements.—The plan under subsection (a) shall include—
(1) an assessment of the decision support capability of the Department of Defense, specifically the analytic expertise the Department is using to link National Defense Strategy objectives to innovative approaches for meeting future challenges, including winning in conflict and competing effectively against strategic competitors;
(2) an approach for comparing competing analyses and conducting joint analyses for force structure to support senior leaders in implementing the National Defense Strategy;
In this subtitle:
(1) The term “operational challenges” means the principal operational challenges to meeting the defense objectives described in the most recent National Defense Strategy, as such challenges are defined by the Secretary of Defense in guidance issued to the Department of Defense. The guidance issued by the Secretary of under the preceding sentence shall—
(2) The term “strategic competitors” means a country labeled as a strategic competitor in the “Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge” issued by the Department of Defense pursuant to section 113 of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Annual report to Congress.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter VIII of chapter 16 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 387. Annual report on transfers of equipment to prohibited entities
“(a) Report required.—Not later than March 1, 2021, and each subsequent year, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the transfer of defense articles during the year preceding the year during which the report is submitted to—
“(b) Matters to Be Included.—Each report required by subsection (a) shall include the following for the year covered by the report:
“(1) A description of any confirmed instance in which the government of a foreign state that has received defense articles pursuant to a Department of Defense assistance authority has subsequently transferred the equipment to a unit of that foreign state that is prohibited from receiving assistance from the United States by reason of a determination by the Secretary of State that there is credible evidence that such unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.
“(2) A description of any instance, confirmed or under investigation, in which the government of a foreign state that has received defense articles pursuant to a Department of Defense assistance authority has subsequently transferred the equipment to a group or organization that is prohibited from receiving assistance from the United States.
(b) Report to Congress.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress (as such term is defined in section 387 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)), a report on the transfer of defense articles during the period beginning on January 1, 2015, and ending on the date of the enactment of this Act to—
(2) MATTERS FOR INCLUSION.—Such report shall include, for such period, each of the following:
(A) A description of any confirmed instance in which the government of a foreign state that has received defense articles pursuant to a Department of Defense assistance authority has subsequently transferred the equipment to a unit of that foreign state that is prohibited from receiving assistance from the United States by reason of a determination by the Secretary of State that there is credible evidence that such unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.
(B) A description of any instance, confirmed or under investigation, in which the government of a foreign state that has received defense articles pursuant to a Department of Defense assistance authority has subsequently transferred the equipment to a group or organization that is prohibited from receiving assistance from the United States.
Section 480 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:
“(c) Elimination of paper submission requirement.—Whenever the Secretary (or other official) provides a report to Congress (or any committee of either House of Congress) in an electronic medium under subsection (a), the Secretary (or other official) shall not be required to submit an additional copy of the report in a paper format.”.
(a) Additional element for report.—Subsection (b) of section 1057 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1572), as amended by section 1062 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), is amended—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraphs:
“(5) A description of any allegations of civilian casualties made by public or non-governmental sources investigated by the Department of Defense.
(b) Definition of non-combatant.—Such section is further amended—
Section 5(a) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended—
(a) In general.—Not later than March 1 of 2020, and each subsequent year until the termination date specified in subsection (c), the Commander of United States Special Operations Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities of the Joint Military Information Support Operations Web Operations Center (hereinafter referred to as the “JMWC”) during the most recently concluded fiscal year.
(b) Contents of report.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following, for the fiscal year covered by the report:
(1) Definitions of initial operating capability and full operational capability as such terms relate to the JMWC.
(2) A detailed description of all activities conducted toward achieving initial operating capability and full operational capability of the JMWC.
(3) A list of all associated funding requested for each program element for achieving initial operating capability and full operational capability.
(4) A detailed description of validated doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, facilities, and policy requirements relating to establishment of the JMWC.
(5) A description of current JMWC capabilities, including information technology infrastructure and contractual arrangements.
(7) The number of military, contractor, and civilian personnel associated with the JMWC and any affiliated agency, service, or other Department of Defense entity.
(9) An identification of inherently governmental functions relating to administration of the JMWC and execution of Military Information Support Operations (hereinafter referred to as “MISO )” programs hosted by the JMWC.
(10) A detailed description of frameworks, metrics, and capabilities established to measure the effectiveness of MISO programs hosted by the JMWC.
(11) A list of all associated funding requested by program element from each of the geographic combatant commanders for MISO programs hosted by the JMWC and a description of such MISO activities.
(13) A description of efforts and activities conducted to share best practices and leverage lessons learned across the Department of Defense relating to MISO programs hosted by the JMWC, as well as a description of such best practices and lessons learned.
(14) An identification of liaisons and detailees to the JMWC from agencies and elements of the Department of Defense.
(a) In general.—The Commander of the United States Transportation Command, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretaries of the military departments, shall conduct a study of the end-to-end, full-spectrum mobility requirements to fulfill the national defense strategy required by section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code, for 2018. Such study shall be completed not later than January 1, 2021.
(b) Elements of study.—The study required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) An assessment of the ability of the programmed airlift aircraft, tanker aircraft, sealift ships, and key mobility enablers to meet the integrated mobility requirements in expected strategic environments, as defined by the guidance in such national defense strategy.
(2) An identification, quantification, and description of the associated risk-to-mission (as defined by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual 3105.01, Joint Risk Analysis) required to fulfill such strategy, including—
(3) An identification of any mobility capability gaps, shortfalls, overlaps, or excesses, including—
(4) The articulation of all key assumptions and decisions made and excursions examined in conducting the study with respect to—
(D) aircraft usage rates, aircraft mission availability rates, aircraft mission capability rates, aircrew ratios, aircrew production, and aircrew readiness rates;
(G) demand signals used to represent missions described in the national defense strategy for 2018, in competition and wartime;
(L) aircraft being used for training or undergoing depot maintenance or modernization or ships undergoing depot maintenance;
(c) Reports and briefings.—
(1) INTERIM REPORT AND BRIEFING.—Not later than June 1, 2020, the Commander of the United States Transportation Command, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretaries of the military departments, shall—
(2) FINAL REPORT AND BRIEFING.—Not later than January 1, 2021, the Commander of the United States Transportation Command, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretaries of the military departments, shall—
(a) Assessment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center for the conduct of an independent assessment of the force structure and roles and responsibilities of special operations forces.
(b) Matters to be considered.—In performing the assessment under this section, the federally funded research and development center shall consider the following matters:
(5) The demand for special operations forces by geographic combatant commanders for security cooperation, exercises, and other missions that could be executed by conventional forces.
(6) Other government and non-government analyses that would contribute to the assessment through variations in study assumptions or potential scenarios.
(9) Current and projected capabilities of other United States Armed Forces that could affect force structure capability and capacity requirements of special operations forces.
(10) The process by which United States Special Operations Command determines force size and structure.
(c) Assessment results.—The results of the assessment under this section shall include each of the following:
(1) Considerations and recommendations for improving the readiness of special operations forces and alternative force structure options.
(a) Strategic plan and modernization roadmap.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall develop a comprehensive strategic plan for Army aviation, which shall be designed to—
(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An assessment of all missions for Army aviation, both current missions and those missions necessary to support the national defense strategy and the U.S. Army in Multi-Domain Operations 2028 concept.
(B) An analysis of platforms, capabilities, and capacities necessary to fulfill such current and future Army aviation missions.
(a) In general.—Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the efforts by the Army and Marine Corps to develop and deploy ground-based long-range rocket and cannon artillery to counter land and maritime threats.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) An assessment of ongoing and future Army and Marine Corps efforts to develop and deploy ground-based long-range rocket and cannon artillery to counter land and maritime fires in the areas of operations of United States Indo-Pacific Command and United States European Command.
(2) An assessment of and recommendations for how the Department of Defense can improve the development and deployment of such artillery.
(3) An analysis and assessment of how such artillery employed in support of the Armed Forces of the United States and allied forces would be deployed, positioned, and controlled to operate effectively against potential adversaries throughout the depth of their tactical, operational, and strategic formations, including any recommendations of the Secretary regarding how such support could be enhanced.
(a) In general.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of each of the military departments, shall enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center for the conduct of an independent review of the transportation working-capital fund (hereinafter referred to as the “TWCF”) of the United States Transportation Command.
(b) Matters for inclusion.—The review conducted under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(2) An assessment of any instances in which excess TWCF funds were used for procurement or modernization efforts that would not otherwise have been funded using amounts made available for operation and maintenance.
(3) Recommendations for how the TWCF could be restructured in order to make the fund more effective and efficient.
(a) In general.—Not later than March 31, 2020, each commander of a geographic combatant command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an assessment of the level of operational risk to that command posed by the plans of the Department of the Navy and Department of the Air Force to provide a mix of fifth generation and advanced fourth generation tactical aircraft capabilities to meet contingency and steady-state operational requirements against adversaries in support of the objectives of the 2018 national defense strategy.
(b) Assessment of risk.—In assessing levels of operational risk under subsection (a), a commander shall use the military risk matrix of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as described in CJCS Instruction 3401.01E.
(a) Annual report.—Not later than May 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the number of strikes undertaken by the United States against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities during the preceding calendar year, as well as assessments of combatant and non-combatant deaths resulting from those strikes.
(b) Contents of report.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include—
(1) information obtained from relevant agencies regarding the general sources of information and methodology used to conduct the assessments of combatant and non-combatant deaths;
(2) to the extent feasible and appropriate, the general reasons for discrepancies between post-strike assessments from the United States and credible reporting from nongovernmental organizations regarding non-combatant deaths resulting from strikes undertaken by the United States against terrorist targets outside areas of active hostilities.
(c) Review of post-strike reporting.—In preparing a report under this section, the Secretary shall review relevant and credible post-strike all-source reporting, including such information from nongovernmental sources, for the purpose of ensuring that this reporting is available to and considered by relevant agencies in their assessment of deaths.
(a) Termination.—Effective on December 30, 2021, each report described in subsection (b) that is still required to be submitted to Congress as of such effective date shall no longer be required to be submitted to Congress.
(b) Covered reports.—A report described in this subsection is a recurring report that is required to be submitted to Congress by the Department of Defense, or by any officer, official, component, or element of the Department, by any annual national defense authorization Act enacted on or after December 30, 2016.
Not later than February 1, 2020, and then biannually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Department of Defense’s operational concepts and plans regarding strategic competitors, including on strategically significant matters identified in the National Defense Strategy, that also addresses each of the following:
(1) Ways of employing the force in peace time to effectively deter strategic competitors below the threshold of war while ensuring readiness for potential conflict.
(2) Ways of adapting innovative, operational concepts needed for strategically significant and plausible scenarios related to strategic competitors.
(3) Ways of addressing operational challenges related to achieving the strategic advantage against strategic competitors related to nuclear, space, cyber, conventional, and unconventional means in warfighting doctrine.
(4) The technologies, force developments, posture and capabilities, readiness, infrastructure, organization, personnel, and other elements of the defense program necessary to enable these operational concepts and its implementation listed in paragraphs (1) through (3).
(5) The ability of the National Security Innovation Base to support the operational concepts listed in paragraphs (1) through (3).
(6) The resources and defense investments necessary to support the operational concepts and its implementation, including budget recommendations.
(a) Title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each amended by striking the item relating to chapter 9A and inserting the following:
- “9A. Audit 240a”.
(2) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each amended by striking the item relating to chapter 112 and inserting the following:
- “112. Cyber Scholarship Program 2200”.
(4) Section 119a is amended in each of the subsection headings for subsections (a) and (b) by striking “AACMS” and inserting “ACCMS”.
(9) The item relating to section 169 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 6 is amended by inserting a period after “Command”.
(10) The item relating to section 183a in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is amended to read as follows:
“183a. Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Clearinghouse for review of mission obstructions.”.
(13) Section 284 is amended—
(D) in subsection (h)(1)(A)(vi)(VI) by striking “section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note) and”.
(15) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter V of chapter 16 is amended by striking “Sec.” after the item relating to section 350.
(19) Section 651(a) is amended by inserting “shall serve” after “(50 U.S.C. 3806(d)(1))”.
(20) The heading of section 928b (article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended to read as follows:
(21) Section 1034(b)(1)(B)(ii) is amended by striking “subsection (i)” and inserting “subsection (j)”;
(23) Section 1074g(b) is amended by striking “under subsection (h)” and inserting “under subsection (i)”.
(24) Section 1075(d)(1) is amended in the table by striking “25% of out of network” and inserting “25% out of network”.
(25) Section 1076d(d)(1) is amended by striking “section 1075 of this section” and inserting “section 1075 of this title”.
(26) Section 1076e(d)(1) is amended by striking “section 1075 of this section” and inserting “section 1075 of this title”.
(28) Section 1762(c) is amended by striking “in at any one time” and inserting “at any one time in”.
(29) Section 1788a is amended in subsection (d)(1) by striking “Not later than March 1, 2019, and each March 1 thereafter” and inserting “Not later than March 1 each year”.
(31) Section 2216(b)(1) is amended by striking “subsection (c)(1)(B)(iii)” and inserting “subsection (c)(1)(B)(ii)”.
(32) Section 2222(i)(11) is amended by striking “subsection (a)(6)(A)” and inserting “subsection (e)(6)(A)”.
(34) The item relating to section 2229b in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 is amended to read as follows:
“2229b. Comptroller General assessment of acquisition programs and initiatives.”.
(37) The heading of section 2284, as added by section 311(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 1708), is amended to read as follows:
(40) (A) Section 2304e is amended by striking the last four words of the section heading.
(B) Section 2323a is amended—
(ii) in subsection (e)—
(II) in paragraph (2), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450b(d))” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5304(d))”; and
(III) in paragraph (3), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450b(e))” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5304(e))”.
(42) Section 2313b(d) is amended by striking “an task order” both places it appears and inserting “a task order”.
(43) Section 2329(g)(1) is amended by striking “ ‘bridge contact’” and inserting “ ‘bridge contract’”.
(44) Section 2339a(e)(5) is amended by striking “section 3542(b)” and inserting “section 3552(b)(6)”.
(45) Section 2366a(c)(1)(F) is amended by striking “section 2366a(b)(6) of this title” and inserting “subsection (b)(6)”.
(49) Section 2417(a)(2) is amended by striking “of eligible entities” and all that follows through “for meetings” and inserting the following: of eligible entities—
(50) The item relating to section 2439 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 144 is amended to read as follows:
“2439. Negotiation of price for technical data before development, production, or sustainment of major weapon systems.”.
(51) The item relating to subchapter II in the table of subchapters for chapter 144B is amended to read as follows:
- “II. Development, Prototyping, and Deployment of Weapon System Components or Technology 2447a”.
(59) Section 2913(c) is amended by striking “government a gas or electric utility” and inserting “government gas or electric utility”.
(60) The item relating to section 2914 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 173 is amended to read as follows:
“2914. Energy resilience and conservation construction projects.”.
(61) (A) The heading of section 8749, as amended by section 1114(b)(2) and redesignated by section 807(d)(6) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), is amended by capitalizing the initial letter of the fifth, sixth, and seventh words and the initial letter of the last two words.
(B) The heading of section 8749a, as added by section 1114(a) and redesignated by section 8(d)(6) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), is amended by capitalizing the initial letter of the fifth, sixth, and seventh words.
(b) NDAA for fiscal year 2019.—Effective as of August 13, 2018, and as if included therein as enacted, the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) is amended as follows:
(2) Section 844(b) (132 Stat. 1881) is amended by striking “This section and the amendments made by this section” and inserting “The amendment made by subsection (a)”.
(3) Section 1246(1)(B) (132 Stat. 2049) is amended by adding at the end before the semicolon the following: “and transferring it to appear after paragraph (15)”.
(4) Section 2805(c) (132 Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 2864 note) is amended by striking “United Facilities Criteria” and inserting “Unified Facilities Criteria”.
(c) NDAA for fiscal year 2018.—Effective as of December 12, 2017, and as if included therein as enacted, section 1609(b)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1728; 10 U.S.C. 2273 note) is amended by striking “, and,” and inserting “, and”.
(d) NDAA for fiscal year 2012.—Effective as of December 31, 2011, and as if included therein as enacted, section 315 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1358; 10 U.S.C. 2911 note) is amended by redesignating subsections (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively.
(a) In general.—Chapter 2 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 119b. Execute orders: congressional oversight
“Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense or the commander of a combatant command issues an execute order, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the chairman and ranking member of each of the congressional defense committees, and their designated staff with the appropriate security clearance, a copy of the execute order.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“119b. Execute orders: congressional oversight.”.
(c) Previously issued execute orders.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the chairman and ranking member of each of the congressional defense committees, and their designated staff with the appropriate security clearance, copies of each execute order issued by the Secretary or by a commander of a combatant command before the date of the enactment of this Act.
Section 1051 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) is amended—
(a) Extension of deadline for report.—Subsection (h)(2) of section 1087 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) is amended by striking “March 1, 2020” an inserting “December 1, 2020”.
(b) Secretary of Defense report.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(l) Report to Congress.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the submittal of the report under subsection (h)(2), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of each of the military departments, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report that includes each of the following:
(c) Authorization of appropriations.—In addition to any other amounts authorized to be appropriated for the National Commission on Military Aviation Safety established under section 1087 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide for fiscal year 2020, as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $3,000,000 shall be available for the National Commission on Aviation Safety.
Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by striking “2019” and inserting “2027”.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish and submit to the congressional defense committees processes and procedures for providing notifications to the committees regarding members of special operations forces, as identified in section 167(j) of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Processes and procedures.—The processes and procedures established under subsection (a) shall—
(1) clarify the roles and responsibilities of the Secretaries of the military departments, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the Commander of United States Special Operations Command;
(a) Assessment required.—The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center for the conduct of an independent assessment of the sufficiency of Department of Defense standards, processes, procedures, and policy relating to civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations.
(b) Matters to be considered.—In conducting the assessment under this section, the federally funded research and development center shall consider the following matters:
(1) Department of Defense policy relating to civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations.
(2) Standards, processes, and procedures for internal assessments and investigations of civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations.
(3) Standards, processes, and procedures for identifying, assessing, investigating, and responding to reports of civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations from the public and non-governmental entities and sources, including the consideration of relevant information from all available sources.
(4) Combatant command organizational constructs for assessing and investigating civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations.
(5) Mechanisms for public and non-governmental entities to report civilian casualties that have resulted from United States military operations to the Department of Defense.
(6) Enterprise-wide mechanisms for accurately recording kinetic strikes, including raids, strikes, and other missions, and civilian casualties resulting from United States military operations.
(7) Standards, processes, procedures, and policy for reducing the likelihood of civilian casualties from United States military operations.
(c) Assessment results.—The results of the assessment under this section shall—
(d) Report to Congress.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the assessment conducted under this section.
(a) Disposal required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall sell all of the IPv4 addresses described in subsection (b) at fair market value. The net proceeds collected from a sale under this section shall be deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury.
(2) DEADLINES FOR CERTAIN BLOCKS.—Of the IPv4 addresses described in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall sell in accordance with paragraph (1)—
(b) IPv4 addresses.—The IPv4 addresses described in this subsection are all IPv4 addresses assigned to any agency or entity of the Department of Defense, including all addresses contained in blocks 6.0.0.0/8, 7.0.0.0/8, 11.0.0.0/8, 21.0.0.0/8, 22.0.0.0/8, 26.0.0.0/8, 28.0.0.0/8, 29.0.0.0/8, 30.0.0.0/8, 33.0.0.0/8, 55.0.0.0/8, 214.0.0.0/8, and 215.0.0.0/8.
(c) Report to Congress.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes each of the following:
(A) A description of the measures taken by the Secretary regarding the disposal of the IPv4 addresses described in subsection (b).
(B) An accounting of the total IPv4 address holdings of the Department of Defense, as of the date of the submittal of the report.
(d) Limitation on use of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, Office of the Secretary of Defense, for Travel of Persons (OP 32 Line 308), not more than 70 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the report required under subsection (c).
(a) Interagency working group.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, acting through the National Science and Technology Council, in consultation with the National Security Advisor, shall establish an interagency working group to coordinate activities to protect federally funded research and development from foreign interference, cyberattacks, theft, or espionage and to develop common definitions and best practices for Federal science agencies and grantees, while accounting for the importance of the open exchange of ideas and international talent required for scientific progress and American leadership in science and technology.
(3) RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE WORKING GROUP.—The working group established under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) identify known and potential cyber, physical, and human intelligence threats and vulnerabilities within the United States scientific and technological enterprise;
(B) coordinate efforts among agencies to share and update important information, including specific examples of foreign interference, cyberattacks, theft, or espionage directed at federally funded research and development or the integrity of the United States scientific enterprise;
(C) identify and assess existing mechanisms for protection of federally funded research and development;
(D) develop an inventory of—
(E) develop and periodically update unclassified policy guidance to assist Federal science agencies and grantees in defending against threats to federally funded research and development and the integrity of the United States scientific enterprise that—
(i) includes—
(I) descriptions of known and potential threats to federally funded research and development and the integrity of the United States scientific enterprise;
(II) common definitions and terminology for categorization of research and technologies that are protected;
(IV) recommendations for how control mechanisms can be utilized to protect federally funded research and development from foreign interference, cyberattacks, theft or espionage, including any recommendations for updates to existing control mechanisms;
(V) recommendations for best practices for Federal science agencies and grantees to defend against threats to federally funded research and development, including coordination and harmonization of any relevant reporting requirements that Federal science agencies implement for grantees;
(4) COORDINATION WITH NATIONAL ACADEMIES ROUNDTABLE.—The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall coordinate with the Academies to ensure that at least one member of the interagency working group is also a member of the roundtable under subsection (b).
(5) INTERIM REPORT.—Not later than six months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall provide a report to the relevant committees that includes the inventory required under paragraph (3)(D), and an update on progress toward developing the policy guidance required under paragraph (3)(E), as well as any additional activities undertaken by the working group in that time.
(6) BIENNIAL REPORTING.—Two years after the date of enactment of this Act, and at least every two years thereafter, the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall provide a summary report to the relevant committees on the activities of the working group and the most current version of the policy guidance required under paragraph (3)(E).
(b) National academies science, technology and security roundtable.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Defense, and any other agencies as determined by the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall enter into a joint agreement with the Academies to create a new “National Science, Technology, and Security Roundtable” (hereinafter in this subsection referred to as the “roundtable”).
(2) PARTICIPANTS.—The roundtable shall include senior representatives and practitioners from Federal science, intelligence, and national security agencies, law enforcement, as well as key stakeholders in the United States scientific enterprise including institutions of higher education, Federal research laboratories, industry, and non-profit research organizations.
(3) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the roundtable is to facilitate among participants—
(A) exploration of critical issues related to protecting United States national and economic security while ensuring the open exchange of ideas and international talent required for scientific progress and American leadership in science and technology;
(B) identification and consideration of security threats and risks involving federally funded research and development, including foreign interference, cyberattacks, theft, or espionage;
(C) identification of effective approaches for communicating the threats and risks identified in subparagraph (b) to the academic and scientific community, including through the sharing of unclassified data and relevant case studies;
Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Director of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation and in consultation with the Secretary of each of the military services, shall develop and implement standardized policy guidance for calculating aircraft operation and sustainment costs for the Department of Defense. Such guidance shall provide for a standardized calculation of—
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Secretary of State, shall jointly establish a Special Federal Aviation Regulation (in this section referred to as the “SFAR”) interagency working group to review the current options for the Department of Defense to use contracted United States civil aviation to provide support for Department of Defense missions in areas where a Federal Aviation Administration SFAR is in effect.
(b) Duties.—The working group shall—
(1) analyze all options currently available for the Department of Defense to use contracted United States civil aviation to provide support for Department of Defense missions in areas where a Federal Aviation Administration SFAR is in effect;
(2) review existing processes of the Department of Defense, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Department of State, with respect to the Department of Defense’s use of contracted United States civil aviation in areas where a Federal Aviation Administration SFAR is in effect;
(c) Members.—
(1) APPOINTMENT.—The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Secretary of State shall each appoint not more than 5 members to the working group with expertise in civil aviation safety, state aircraft operations, the provision of contracted aviation support to the Department of Defense, and the coordination of such efforts between the Department of Defense, the Department of State, and the Federal Aviation Administration. The 5 members appointed by the Secretary of Transportation shall include at least 3 members from the Federal Aviation Administration.
(d) Report.—Not later than 1 year after the date it is established, the working group shall submit a report on its findings and any recommendations developed pursuant to subsection (b) to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.
(e) Termination.—The working group shall terminate 90 days after the date the report is submitted under subsection (d).
Section 1599h(b)(1)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “100 positions” and inserting “140 positions”.
(a) In general.—Section 1599e of title 10, United States Code, is amended by—
(c) Application.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to any covered employee (as that term is defined in paragraph (1) of section 1599e(b) of title 10, United States Code) appointed to a position described under subparagraph (A) or (B) of such paragraph on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
Section 129 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and as most recently amended by section 1115 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), is further amended by striking “2020” and inserting “2021”.
(a) Extension of authority.—Section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 1104 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), is further amended by striking “through 2019” and inserting “through 2020”.
Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subsection (g) of section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(B) such functions may be performed by military personnel for a period that does not exceed one year if the Secretary of the military department concerned determines that—
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 1125 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328), as amended by subsection (a) of section 1102 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91), is further amended by striking “through 2021,” and inserting “through 2025,”.
Section 1603 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Additional allowances and benefits for certain employees of the defense clandestine service.— (1) Beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report under paragraph (3)(A), in addition to the authority to provide compensation under subsection (a), the Secretary may provide a covered employee allowances and benefits under paragraph (1) of section 9904 of title 5 without regard to the limitations in that section—
“(B) that the activities to which the employee is assigned be in support of Department of Defense activities abroad.
“(2) The Secretary may not provide allowances and benefits under paragraph (1) to more than 125 covered employees per year.
“(3) (A) The Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report containing a strategy addressing the mission of the Defense Clandestine Service during the period covered by the most recent future-years defense program submitted under section 221 of this title, including—
“(ii) how the authority provided by paragraph (1) will assist the Secretary in carrying out such mission; and
“(iii) an implementation plan for carrying out paragraph (1), including a projection of how much the amount of the allowances and benefits provided under such paragraph compare with the amount of the allowances and benefits provided before the date of the report.
“(B) Not later than December 31, 2020, and each year thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, with respect to the fiscal year preceding the date on which the report is submitted—
(a) In general.—Section 2302 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(g) (1) All protections afforded to an employee under subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D) of subsection (b)(1) shall be afforded, in the same manner and to the same extent, to an intern and an applicant for internship.
“(2) For purposes of the application of this subsection, a reference to an employee shall be considered a reference to an intern in—
“(A) section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–16);
“(B) sections 12 and 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 631, 633a); and
“(C) section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
(a) Sense of Congress.—Section 102 of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended—
(b) Notification of Violation.—Section 202 of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(d) Notification of final agency action.—
“(1) Not later than 30 days after a Federal agency takes final action or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issues an appellate decision involving a finding of discrimination or retaliation prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a), as applicable, the head of the agency subject to the finding shall provide notice for at least 1 year on the agency’s internet website in a clear and prominent location linked directly from the agency’s internet home page stating that a finding of discrimination or retaliation has been made.
“(2) The notification shall identify the date the finding was made, the date or dates on which the discriminatory or retaliatory act or acts occurred, and the law or laws violated by the discriminatory or retaliatory act or acts. The notification shall also advise Federal employees of the rights and protections available under the respective provisions of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a).”.
(c) Reporting requirements.—
(1) ELECTRONIC FORMAT REQUIREMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 203(a) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended—
(B) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by paragraph (1)(C) shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.
(C) TRANSITION PERIOD.—Notwithstanding the requirements of section 203(a) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note), the report required under such section may be submitted in an electronic format, as prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending on the effective date in paragraph (2).
(2) REPORTING REQUIREMENT FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION.—Section 203 of such Act is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(c) Disciplinary action report.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which a Federal agency takes final action or a Federal agency receives an appellate decision issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission involving a finding of discrimination or retaliation in violation of a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a), as applicable, the employing Federal agency shall submit to the Commission a report stating whether disciplinary action has been initiated against a Federal employee as a result of the violation.”.
(d) Data to be posted by employing Federal agencies.—Section 301(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended—
(e) Data to be posted by the equal employment opportunity commission.—Section 302(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by striking “(10)” and inserting “(11)”.
(f) Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act amendments.—
(1) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by adding after section 206 the following:
“SEC. 207. Complaint tracking.
“Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Federal Employee Antidiscrimination Act of 2019, each Federal agency shall establish a system to track each complaint of discrimination arising under section 2302(b)(1) of title 5, United States Code, and adjudicated through the Equal Employment Opportunity process from inception to resolution of the complaint, including whether a decision has been made regarding necessary disciplinary action as the result of a finding of discrimination.
“SEC. 208. Notation in personnel record.
“If a Federal agency takes an adverse action covered under section 7512 of title 5, United States Code, against a Federal employee for an act of discrimination or retaliation prohibited by a provision of law covered by paragraph (1) or (2) of section 201(a), the agency shall, after all appeals relating to such action have been exhausted, include a notation of the adverse action and the reason for the action in the employee’s personnel record.”.
(2) PROCESSING AND REFERRAL.—The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 401. Processing and resolution of complaints.
“Each Federal agency is responsible for the fair, impartial processing and resolution of complaints of employment discrimination and retaliation arising in the Federal administrative process and shall establish a model Equal Employment Opportunity Program that—
“(1) is not under the control, either structurally or practically, of a Human Capital or General Counsel office;
“SEC. 402. No limitation on Human Capital or General Counsel advice.
“Nothing in this title shall prevent a Federal agency’s Human Capital or General Counsel office from providing advice or counsel to Federal agency personnel on the processing and resolution of a complaint, including providing legal representation to a Federal agency in any proceeding.
“SEC. 403. Head of Program reports to head of agency.
“The head of each Federal agency’s Equal Employment Opportunity Program shall report directly to the head of the agency.
“SEC. 404. Referrals of findings of discrimination.
“(a) EEOC findings of discrimination.—Not later than 30 days after the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issues an appellate decision involving a finding of discrimination or retaliation within a Federal agency, the Commission shall refer the matter to the Office of Special Counsel.
“(b) Referrals to special counsel.—The Office of Special Counsel shall accept and review a referral from the Commission under subsection (a) for purposes of seeking disciplinary action under its authority against a Federal employee who commits an act of discrimination or retaliation.
“(c) Notification.—The Office of Special Counsel shall notify the Commission in a case in which the Office of Special Counsel initiates disciplinary action.
“(d) Special counsel approval.—A Federal agency may not take disciplinary action against a Federal employee for an alleged act of discrimination or retaliation referred by the Commission under this section except in accordance with the requirements of section 1214(f) of title 5, United States Code.”.
(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 (5 U.S.C. 2301 note) is amended—
(g) Nondisclosure agreement limitation.—Section 2302(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding after subparagraph (A), as added by paragraph (1)(B), and preceding the flush left matter that follows paragraph (13), the following:
“(B) implement or enforce any nondisclosure policy, form, or agreement, if such policy, form, or agreement prohibits or restricts an employee from disclosing to Congress, the Office of Special Counsel, or an Office of the Inspector General any information that relates to any violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial, and specific danger to public health or safety, or any other whistleblower protection.”.
(a) In general.—Section 9905 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(B) by adding afer paragraph (4) the following:
“(5) Any scientific, technical, engineering, or mathematics positions, including technicians, within the defense acquisition workforce, or any category of acquisition positions within the Department designated by the Secretary as a shortage or critical need category.
“(6) Any scientific, technical, engineering, or mathematics position, except any such position within any defense Scientific and Technology Reinvention Laboratory, for which a qualified candidate is required to possess a bachelor’s degree or an advanced degree, or for which a veteran candidate is being considered.
“(7) Any category of medical or health professional positions within the Department designated by the Secretary as a shortage category or critical need occupation.
“(8) Any childcare services position for which there is a critical hiring need and a shortage of childcare providers.
“(9) Any financial management, accounting, auditing, actuarial, cost estimation, operational research, or business or business administration position, for which a qualified candidate is required to possess a finance, accounting, management or actuarial science degree or a related degree, or a related degree equivalent experience.
(2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
“(b) Sunset.—
“(c) Suspension of other hiring authorities.—During the period beginning on the effective date of the regulations issued to carry out the hiring authority with respect to positions described in paragraphs (5) through (10) of subsection (a) and ending on the date described in subsection (b)(1), the Secretary of Defense may not exercise or otherwise use any hiring authority provided under the following provisions of law:
“(2) Sections 1112 and 1113 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1033).
“(3) Sections 1110 and 1643(a)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2450 and 2602).
“(4) Sections 559 and 1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91).”.
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than February 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall contract with a Federally funded research and development center to submit a report to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives.
(2) CONTENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) assess and identify steps that could be taken to improve the competitive hiring process at the Department and ensure that direct hiring is conducted in a manner consistent with ensuring a merit based civil service and a diverse workforce in the Department and the rest of the Federal Government; and
(3) OTHER MATTERS.—The Federally funded research and development center selected to carry out the report under this subsection shall, in preparing such report, consult with all stakeholders, public sector unions, hiring managers, career agency, and Office of Personnel Management personnel specialists, and survey public sector employees and job applicants, when developing its analysis and recommendations.
(a) Recipients of whistleblower disclosures.—Section 2302(b)(8)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “or to the Inspector” and all that follows through “such disclosures” and inserting “the Inspector General of an agency, a supervisor in the employee's direct chain of command up to and including the head of the employing agency, or to an employee designated by any of the aforementioned individuals for the purpose of receiving such disclosures”.
(b) Determination of budgetary effects.—The budgetary effects of this section, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this section, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
(a) Authority.—Subsection (a)(7) of section 333 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “existing” before “international coalition operation”.
(b) Notice and wait on activities under programs.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(9) In the case of a program described in subsection (a)(7), each of the following:
Section 1207 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (10 U.S.C. 2342 note) is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
“(d) Reports to Congress.—If the authority provided under this section is exercised during a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the exercise of such authority by not later than October 30 of the year in which such fiscal year ends. Each report on the exercise of such authority shall specify the recipient country of the equipment loaned, the type of equipment loaned, and the duration of the loan of such equipment.”; and
Section 381(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “30 days” and inserting “60 days”.
Section 333(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110– 181; 122 Stat. 393) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “October 1, 2018, and ending on December 31, 2019” and inserting “October 1, 2019, and ending on December 31, 2020”.
(a) Principal aliens.—Subclause (I) of section 602(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended to read as follows:
(b) Extension of afghan special immigrant program.—Section 602(b)(3)(F) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—
(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking “December 31, 2020” and inserting “December 31, 2022”.
(a) Termination of authority.—Subsection (f) of section 801 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2399) is amended by striking “December 31, 2019” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.
(b) Report on authority.—Such section, as so amended, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(g) Report on authority.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the use of the authority provided in subsection (a). The report shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(a) Authority.—During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2020, not more than $5,000,000, to be derived from funds authorized to be appropriated to the Office of the Secretary of Defense under the Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide account, may be made available for ex gratia payments for damage, personal injury, or death that is incident to combat operations of the United States Armed Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Libya, and Yemen.
(b) Notice.—The Secretary of Defense shall, upon each exercise of the authority in this subsection, submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:
(c) Authorities applicable to payment.—Any payment made pursuant to this subsection shall be made in accordance with the authorities and limitations in section 8121 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2015 (division C of Public Law 113–235), other than subsection (h) of such section.
Section 1225 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3558) is amended—
(a) Limitation on availability of authority.—Of the amounts made available for fiscal year 2020 pursuant to the authorization in section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3558), as amended by this section, not more than 70 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report in unclassified form, that may include a classified annex, that includes each of the following:
(1) Any updates to or changes in the plan, strategy, process, vetting requirements and process as described in subsection (e) of such section 1236, and end-use monitoring mechanisms and procedures.
(2) A description of how attacks against United States or coalition personnel are being mitigated, statistics on any such attacks, including “green-on-blue” attacks.
(3) A description of the forces receiving assistance authorized under subsection (a) of such section 1236.
(5) A description of any misuse or loss of provided equipment and how such misuse or loss is being mitigated.
(6) An assessment of the operational effectiveness of the forces receiving assistance authorized under subsection (a) of such section 1236.
(7) A description of sustainment support provided to the forces authorized under subsection (a) of such section 1236.
(8) A list of new projects for construction, repair, or renovation commenced during the period covered by such progress report, and a list of projects for construction, repair, or renovation continuing from the period covered by the preceding progress report.
(9) A statement of the amount of funds expended during the period for which the report is submitted.
(10) An assessment of the effectiveness of the assistance authorized under subsection (a) of such section 1236.
(11) A list of the forces or elements of forces that are restricted from receiving assistance under subsection (a) of such section 1236, other than the forces or elements of forces with respect to which the Secretary of Defense has exercised the waiver authority under subsection (j) of such section 1236, as a result of vetting required by subsection (e) of such section 1236 or by section 2249e of title 10, United States Code, and a detailed description of the reasons for such restriction, including for each force or element, as applicable, the following:
(A) Information relating to gross violation of human rights committed by such force or element, including the time-frame of the alleged violation.
(B) The source of the information described in subparagraph (A) and an assessment of the veracity of the information.
(b) Funding.—Subsection (g) of section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3558) is amended—
(c) Modification of elements in quarterly progress reports.—Subsection (d) of such section 1236 is amended—
(a) In general.—Section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3559) is amended as follows:
(1) In subsection (a)—
(2) By amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
“(b) Notice before provision of assistance.—Not later than 15 days prior to each instance of the provision of assistance under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate a notification that includes the following:
“(2) The requirements and process used to determine appropriately vetted recipients with respect to the assistance.
“(3) The mechanisms and procedures that will be used to monitor and report to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate on unauthorized end-use of provided training and equipment or other violations of relevant law by appropriately vetted recipients.
“(5) The budget and implementation timeline, with milestones and anticipated delivery schedule for the assistance.
“(6) A description of any material use of assistance previously provided under subsection (a) to any appropriately vetted recipient of such assistance for a purpose other than the purposes specified in subsection (a) that occurred since the most recent notification submitted by the Secretary pursuant to this subsection, with a specific description of the following:
(4) By striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
“(f) Restriction on scope of assistance in the form of weapons.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may only provide assistance in the form of weapons pursuant to the authority under subsection (a) if such weapons are small arms, including handguns, rifles and carbines, sub-machine guns, or light machine guns.
“(2) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive the restriction under paragraph (1) if the Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that such provision of law would (but for the waiver) impede national security objectives of the United States by prohibiting, restricting, delaying, or otherwise limiting the provision of assistance. Such waiver shall not take effect until 15 days after the date on which such certification is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees.”.
(5) In subsection (g)—
(6) In subsection (k), by inserting “, at the end of the 15-day period beginning on the date the Secretary notifies the congressional defense committees of the amount, recipient, and intended purpose of such assistance” after “authorized under this section”.
(7) In subsection (l)—
(B) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Amounts accepted as contributions pursuant to the authority in subsection (g) for construction and repair projects may be expended without regard to the limitation under this subsection.”;
(D) by adding at the end the following:
“(2) WAIVER.—The Secretary may waive the limitation under paragraph (1) if the Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that such provision of law would (but for the waiver) impede national security objectives of the United States by prohibiting, restricting, delaying, or otherwise limiting the provision of assistance. Such waiver shall not take effect until 15 days after the date on which such certification is submitted to the appropriate congressional committees.”.
(b) Effective date and availability of authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this section.
(2) AVAILABILITY OF AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary may not provide assistance pursuant to the authority provided by section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3559), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, during the period beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on the date on which each quarterly report required to be submitted pursuant to subsection (d) of such section 1209, as of the date of the enactment of this section, has been submitted.
(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “fiscal year 2019” and inserting “fiscal year 2020”.
(c) Limitation on availability of funds.—Of the amount available for fiscal year 2020 for section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as amended by this section, not more than an amount equal to 50 percent may be obligated or expended for the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq until the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, that each of the following reforms relating to that Office has been completed:
(2) The development of a Joint Service staffing plan to reorganize the Office similar to that of other security cooperation offices in the region, that places foreign area officers in key leadership positions and closes duplicative or extraneous sections.
(3) The planning and initiation of bilateral engagement with the Government of Iraq for the purpose of establishing a Joint Military Commission and the initiation and drafting of a five-year security assistance roadmap for developing strategic and sustainable military capacity and capabilities for Iraq that includes a plan to reform Iraq's defense industrial base and security sector by reducing corruption and optimizing procurement.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be used to knowingly provide weapons or any other form of support to Al Qaeda, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Jabhat Fateh al Sham, or any individual or group affiliated with any such organization.
Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act may be construed to authorize the use of military force against Iran.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States led coalition and coalition enabled partner forces, including Ministry of Peshmerga forces of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and Iraqi Security Forces (ISF), have made significant gains in liberating all territory in Iraq from Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) control and disrupting ISIS safe havens and networks;
(2) nevertheless, ISIS is regenerating key functions and capabilities in Iraq, and ISIS elements will continue to exist in Iraq for the foreseeable future;
(3) ISIS will attempt to rebuild combat power through clandestine networks providing sanctuary, and ISIS will continue to attempt to conduct insurgent-type activities while simultaneously recruiting and training fighters, establishing facilitation networks, and attempting to remain relevant in the information domain;
(4) the Ministry of Peshmerga forces of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq made significant contributions and sacrifices in the United States-led campaign to degrade, dismantle, and destroy ISIS; and
(5) the Department of Defense and the Department of State should continue to work with and support the non-partisan forces of the Ministry of Peshmerga of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq in order to continue to develop their capabilities, promote security sector reforms, and enhance sustainability and interoperability with the other elements of the Iraqi security forces in order to provide for Iraq’s lasting security against terrorist threats.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) Since 1992, the United States has supported the Open Skies Treaty with dedicated aircraft and observation mission teams, conducting several hundred training and observation missions with other countries.
(2) This commitment by the United States has helped to confirm and refine operational procedures, to improve implementation and effectiveness of the Open Skies Treaty, and provide United States leadership and engagement opportunities that have supported broader objectives and improved European transparency.
(3) The Open Skies Treaty provides signatories with the ability to gather information through aerial imaging on military forces and activities of concern to them which contributes to greater transparency and stability in the Euro-Atlantic region, which benefits both the United States and United States allies and partners.
(4) In order to maximize United States benefits from the Open Skies Treaty, the United States needs to recapitalize and modernize its aircraft and sensors, and the ongoing work to certify the Digital Visual Imaging System and the new effort for the Open Skies Treaty Aircraft Recapitalization (OSTAR) are critical to United States leadership and involvement in the Treaty.
(5) The current 1960s-era United States aircraft used with respect to the Open Skies Treaty are ill-suited to extreme operating environments in Russia and experience regular, unplanned maintenance issues, often resulting in mission delays or cancellations.
(6) The OSTAR effort will provide a United States aircraft capability that allows the United States to fully implement the goals and objectives of the Open Skies Treaty.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(c) Prohibition.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be obligated or expended to take any action to suspend, terminate, or withdraw the United States from the Open Skies Treaty.
(2) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in paragraph (1) shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State jointly determine and certify to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, that—
(d) Repeal of limitation on use of funds to vote to approve or otherwise adopt any implementing decision of the Open Skies Consultative Commission and modifications to report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2491) is amended—
(2) MODIFICATIONS TO REPORT.—Subsection (a) of such section, as so redesignated, is amended—
(B) in paragraph (1)—
(C) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) and inserting the following:
“(B) In the case of an observation flight by the United States, including an observation flight over the territory of Russia—
“(C) In the case of an observation flight over the territory of the United States—
“(i) an analysis of whether and the extent to which any United States critical infrastructure was the subject of image capture activities of such observation flight;
(e) Open skies: implementation plan.—Section 1235(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1660) is amended—
Section 1232(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2488), is amended by striking “or 2019” and inserting “, 2019, or 2020”.
(a) Prohibition.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement any activity that recognizes the sovereignty of Russia over Crimea.
Section 1250 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1068) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking “in coordination with the Secretary of State” and inserting “with the concurrence of the Secretary of State”;
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(b) Assessment required.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services, the Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate an assessment that includes each of the following:
(1) The implications, in terms of military threat to the United States or its allies in Europe, of Russian deployment of intermediate-range cruise and ballistic missiles without restriction.
(2) What new capabilities the United States might need in order to pursue additional technologies or programs to offset such Russian capabilities, and the costs associated with such capabilities, technologies, and programs.
(3) An assessment of the threat to the United States of Russia’s strategic nuclear force in the event the New START Treaty lapses.
(4) What measures could have been taken short of withdrawal, including economic, military, and diplomatic options, to increase pressure on Russia for violating the INF Treaty.
(c) Withholding of funds.—Until the date of the submission of the assessment required by subsection (b), an amount that is equal to 20 percent of the total amount authorized to be appropriated to the Office of the Secretary of Defense under the Operations and Maintenance, Defense-Wide account for the travel of persons shall be withheld from obligation or expenditure.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
It is the sense of Congress that, in order to strengthen the defense of United States and its allies and partners in Europe and avert the risk of miscalculation and unintended escalation that could lead to a broader and dangerous military catastrophe, the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State, in consultation with the commander of United States European Command and Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, should—
(1) pursue updating and modernizing the Agreement on the prevention of incidents on and over the high seas (entered into force with respect to the United States on May 25, 1972; 23 U.S.T. 1063);
(3) explore the possibility of updating the notifications in the Vienna Document of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe with a view to reducing the risk that the United States, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or Russia might misinterpret a military exercise, including pursuing greater use of the Vienna Document’s provision that provides for voluntary hosting of visits that seek to dispel possible concern regarding military activities.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) Georgia is a valued friend of the United States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to advancing the mutual interests of both countries, including the deployment of Georgian forces as part of the former International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the current Resolute Support Mission led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in Iraq.
(2) The European Deterrence Initiative builds the partnership capacity of Georgia so it can work more closely with the United States and NATO, as well as provide for its own defense.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are highly valued allies of the United States, and they have repeatedly demonstrated their commitment to advancing our mutual interests as well as those of the NATO Alliance.
(2) Operation Atlantic Resolve is a series of exercises and coordinating efforts demonstrating the United States’ commitment to its European partners and allies, including the Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, with the shared goal of peace and stability in the region. Operation Atlantic Resolve strengthens communication and understanding, and is an important effort to deter Russian aggression in the region.
(b) Sense of Congress.—Congress—
(1) reaffirms its support for the principle of collective defense in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty for our NATO allies, including Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania;
(2) supports the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and inviolability of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania as well as their internationally recognized borders, and expresses concerns over increasingly aggressive military maneuvering by the Russian Federation near their borders and airspace;
(a) Types of assistance and training.—Subsection (c)(2)(A) of section 1263 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (10 U.S.C. 2282 note) is amended by inserting “the law of armed conflict, the rule of law, and” after “respect for”.
(b) Notice to Congress on assistance and training.—Subsection (g)(1) of such section is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting at the end before the period the following: “, the specific unit or units whose capacity to engage in activities under a program of assistance or training to be provided under subsection (a) will be built under the program, and the amount, type, and purpose of the support to be provided”;
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the following new subparagraphs:
“(F) Information, including the amount, type, and purpose, on assistance and training provided under subsection (a) during the three preceding fiscal years, if applicable.
“(G) A description of the elements of the theater campaign plan of the geographic combatant command concerned and the interagency integrated country strategy that will be advanced by the assistance and training provided under subsection (a).
(c) Annual monitoring reports.—Such section is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection:
“(h) Annual monitoring reports.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than December 31, 2019, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth, for the preceding calendar year, the following:
“(A) Information, by recipient foreign country, on the status of funds allocated for assistance and training provided under subsection (a), including funds allocated but not yet obligated or expended.
(d) Limitations.—Such section, as so amended, is further amended by inserting after subsection (h), as added by subsection (c)(2), the following:
“(i) Limitations.—
“(1) ASSISTANCE OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of assistance or training that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law.
(e) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 31, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the implementation of the Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Initiative under section 1263 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, as amended by this section.
(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) Objectives of the Initiative, including—
(B) A discussion of how the Initiative relates to, complements, or overlaps with other United States security cooperation and security assistance authorities.
(C) A description of the process and criteria by which the utilization of each such authority or authorities described in subparagraph (B) is determined.
(E) A discussion, by recipient foreign country, of—
(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1641) is amended—
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to reduce the total number of members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty who are deployed to South Korea below 28,500 unless the Secretary of Defense first certifies to the congressional defense committees the following:
(a) In general.—Not later than March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the direct, indirect, and burden-sharing contributions of Japan and South Korea to support overseas military installations of the United States and United States Armed Forces deployed to or permanently stationed in Japan and South Korea, respectively.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) The benefits to United States national security and regional security derived from the forward presence of United States Armed Forces in the Indo-Pacific region, including Japan and South Korea.
(2) For calendar year 2016 and each subsequent calendar year, a description of the one-time and recurring costs associated with the presence of United States Armed Forces in Japan and South Korea, including—
(3) A description of direct, indirect, and burden-sharing contributions of Japan and South Korea, including—
(B) contributions to military construction projects of the Department of Defense, including planning, design, environmental reviews, construction, construction management costs, rents on privately-owned land, facilities, labor, utilities, and vicinity improvements;
(c) Description of contributions in United States dollars.—The report required by subsection (a) shall describe the direct, indirect, and burden-sharing contributions of Japan and South Korea in United States dollars and shall specify the exchange rates used to determine the United States dollar value of such contributions.
(a) Strategy required.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the Department of Defense’s objectives and strategy for achieving such objectives with the Philippines.
(b) Elements of strategy.—The strategy required by subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1) A description of the national security interests and objectives of the United States furthered by the Mutual Defense Treaty between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America.
(2) A description of the regional security environment, including an assessment of threats to United States national security interests and the role of the Department of Defense in addressing such threats, including—
(3) A description of Department of Defense objectives with respect to the Philippines and the benchmarks for assessing progress towards such objectives.
(4) An identification of all current and planned Department of Defense resources, programs, and activities to support the strategy, including a review of the necessity of an ongoing named operation and the criteria used to determine such necessity.
(5) An identification of all current and planned Department of Defense security cooperation and other support or assistance programs or activities in the Philippines, including—
(A) a description of the purpose, objectives, and type of training, equipment, or assistance provided under each such program or activity;
(C) an identification of the authority or authorities under which each such program or activity is conducted;
(D) a description of the process and criteria used to determine utilization between each such authority or authorities;
(E) a description of how each such program or activity advances United States national security interests as it relates to the Department’s strategy on the Philippines;
(F) an identification of the specific units of the Philippine national security forces to receive training, equipment, or assistance under each such program;
(G) a description of the process and criteria by which specific units of the Philippine national security forces are selected as recipients of such programs and activities;
(H) an assessment of the current operational effectiveness of such units and their command and control structures and a description of the metrics used to make and carry out such assessment;
(I) an identification of priority capabilities of such units to enhance through training, equipment, or assistance under each such program or activity;
(J) a plan to monitor and assess each such program or activity to meet its objectives to enhance the capabilities of each such unit;
(K) a description of the planned posture of United States Armed Forces and the planned level of engagement by such forces with elements of the Philippine national security forces; and
(a) Annual report.—Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by inserting “, in consultation with the heads of other Federal departments and agencies as appropriate,” after “the Secretary of Defense”.
(b) Matters to be included.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended by striking paragraph (26) and inserting the following:
“(26) An assessment of Chinese overseas investment, including a state-owned or controlled digital or physical infrastructure project of China, and their relationship to Chinese security and military objectives, including implications for United States military or government interests related to denial of access, compromised intelligence activities, and network advantages.”.
(c) Specified congressional committees.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(d) Other definitions.—Such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
“(d) Other definitions.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—In subsection (b)(26), the term ‘state-owned or controlled digital or physical infrastructure project of China’ means a transportation, energy, or information technology infrastructure project owned, controlled, under the direct or indirect influence of, or subsidized by the Government of China, including any agency, instrumentality, subdivision, or other unit of government at any level of jurisdiction.
“(2) OWNED; CONTROLLED.—In paragraph (1)—
“(A) the term ‘owned’, with respect to a project, means a majority or controlling interest, whether by value or voting interest, in that project, including through fiduciaries, agents, or other means; and
(a) Annual report.—Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by inserting “, in consultation with the heads of other Federal departments and agencies as appropriate,” after “the Secretary of Defense”.
(b) Matters to be included.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(29) Developments relating to the China Coast Guard (in this paragraph referred to as the ‘CCG’), including an assessment of—
“(A) how the change in the CCG’s command structure to report to China’s Central Military Commission affects the CCG’s status as a law enforcement entity;
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Taiwan Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) and the “Six Assurances” are both cornerstones of United States relations with Taiwan;
(2) the United States should continue to strengthen defense and security cooperation with Taiwan to support the development of capable, ready, and modern defense forces necessary for Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability, including capabilities in support of an asymmetric defense strategy;
(3) the United States should continue to support the acquisition by Taiwan of appropriate defensive weapons through foreign military sales, direct commercial sales, and industrial cooperation, with a particular emphasis on asymmetric warfare, information sharing, air defense, and maritime capabilities, consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act;
(4) the United States should improve the predictability of arms sales to Taiwan by ensuring timely review of and response to requests of Taiwan for defense articles and defense services as well as timely notification to Congress and adherence to congressional oversight and review procedures; and
(5) the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, should promote policies concerning cooperation and exchanges that enhance the security of Taiwan, including exchanges between senior defense officials and general officers of the United States and Taiwan consistent with the Taiwan Travel Act (Public Law 115–135).
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States Armed Forces and Singaporean armed forces have built a strong and enduring security partnership based on long-standing and mutually beneficial cooperation;
(2) security cooperation between the United States Armed Forces and Singaporean armed forces is crucial to promoting peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region;
(3) Singapore’s status as a major security cooperation partner of the United States, as recognized in the “2005 Strategic Framework Agreement between the United States and the Republic of Singapore for a Closer Partnership in Defense and Security”, has an important role in the promotion of peace and stability, and global efforts to counter terrorism;
(4) Singapore’s provision of access to its military facilities for the United States has supported the continued security presence of the United States in Southeast Asia;
(5) the Singaporean armed forces’ support of United States-led multinational reconstruction efforts in Iraq from 2003 to 2008, reconstruction and stabilization efforts in Afghanistan from 2007 to 2013, counter-piracy operations in the Gulf of Aden under the ambit of Combined Task Force 151, and contribution of physical and military assets to the Defeat-ISIS Coalition since 2014, has contributed to global efforts to counter terrorism;
(6) in recognition of the enduring security partnership between the United States and Singapore, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, should, in negotiating the renewal of the “1990 Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the United States Use of Facilities in Singapore” that is due in 2020:
(a) Authorization.—Subsection (a) of section 1244 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2541) is amended by striking “2020” and inserting “2023”.
(b) Repeal of certification; limitation.—Such section is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:
“(c) Limitation.—Of the amounts made available under subsection (a) for fiscal year 2020, not more than 90 percent of such amounts may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the rearrangement of responsibilities for overseeing and supporting NSHQ from U.S. Special Operations Command to U.S. European Command in 2019, including—
(c) Annual report.—Such section, as so amended, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) Annual report.—Not later than March 1 of each year until 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report regarding support for the NSHQ. Each report shall include the following:
“(1) The total amount of funding provided by the United States and other NATO nations to the NSHQ for operating costs of the NSHQ.
“(2) A description of the activities carried out with such funding, including—
“(C) the extent to which each such activity is carried out in coordination or cooperation with the Joint Special Operations University;
“(D) the extent to which each such activity is carried out in relation to other security cooperation activities, exercises, or operations of the Department of Defense;
(a) Plan required.—Section 1273(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1696) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “the date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, and annually thereafter”; and
(b) Budget display information.—The Secretary of Defense shall include in the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2021 and each fiscal year thereafter (as submitted under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code), a detailed budget display for the European Deterrence Initiative that includes the following information (regardless of whether the funding line is for overseas contingency operations):
(2) With respect to research, development, test, and evaluation accounts—
(3) With respect to operation and maintenance accounts—
(a) Report on obligation of funds.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 15 days after any obligation of funds in an amount of $10,000,000 or more for the European Deterrence Initiative for fiscal year 2020 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on that obligation of such funds for that fiscal year.
(b) End of fiscal year report.—Not later than November 30, 2020, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains—
(1) a detailed summary of funds obligated for the European Deterrence Initiative for the preceding fiscal year; and
(2) a detailed comparison of funds obligated for the European Deterrence Initiative for the preceding fiscal year to amounts requested for the Initiative for that fiscal year in the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary in support of the budget of the President for that fiscal year as required by section 1252(b), including with respect to each of the accounts described in paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) of section 1252(b) and the information required under each such paragraph.
It is the policy of the United States to develop, implement, and sustain a credible deterrent against aggression and long-term strategic competition by the Government of Russia in order to enhance regional and global security and stability, including by the following:
(1) Increased United States presence in Europe, including additional permanently stationed forces, continued rotational deployments, increased pre-positioned military equipment, and sufficient and necessary infrastructure additions and improvements throughout Europe.
(2) Planning regarding the United States military footprint in Europe to recognize the essential role played by United States allies and partners in establishing deterrence and advancing regional and global security and stability.
(3) Commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its founding values and commitments by NATO allies to the common defense, including NATO goals regarding defense investments, and to NATO’s founding principles of democracy, individual liberty, and the rule of law.
(4) Planning to ensure the United States military footprint in Europe is holistic and geographically appropriate for a comprehensive response to the challenges posed by the Government of Russia across numerous European fronts.
(5) Commitment to United States Government investment and prioritization of efforts in Europe, particularly through efforts led by the Department of State, to counter the Government of Russia’s global campaign to interfere in and undermine democratic systems of government, elections, values, and institutions, and disrupt United States alliances and partnerships, through indirect action (such as information operations intended to influence), including robust information sharing and cooperation with partners and allies to counter influence campaigns and sufficient cyber, counter-messaging, and intelligence resources.
(a) Limitation.—Except as provided in subsection (b), no funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 may be obligated or expended—
(1) to transfer, facilitate the transfer, or authorize the transfer of, any F–35 aircraft or related support equipment or parts to Turkey;
(b) Exception.—The Secretary of Defense, jointly with the Secretary of State, may waive the limitation under subsection (a) only if such Secretaries submit to the appropriate congressional committees a written certification that contains a determination of such Secretaries, and any relevant documentation that forms the basis for the determination, that—
(1) the Government of Turkey has provided credible assurances that Turkey will not accept delivery of the S–400 air and missile defense system from Russia; or
(c) Applicability.—The limitation under subsection (a) does not apply with respect to F–35 aircraft operated by the United States Armed Forces.
(a) In general.—Not later than June 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense, jointly with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the value of investments in dual use infrastructure projects by the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in order to improve military mobility and interoperability across Europe.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) DUAL USE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS.—The term “dual use infrastructure projects” means those projects identified by the European Commission Action Plan on Military Mobility as necessary to improve the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) to meet the military requirements for military mobility within and beyond the European Union.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Poland has been a valued member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) since 1999 and an important ally of the United States, contributing to the collective defense of NATO allies and deterrence in Europe.
(2) Poland has made significant contributions of forces to United States and NATO-led military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Kosovo, and countering the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States reaffirms its support for the principle of collective defense in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty for its NATO allies, including Poland;
(2) the United States appreciates the important role that Poland plays in NATO efforts to sustain credible deterrence in Europe;
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) United States partners and allies are critical to achieving United States national security interests and defense objectives around the world;
Section 1264 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1689) is amended—
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, Office of the Secretary of Defense, for Travel of Persons, not more than 80 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report that contains a description of each award and disciplinary action issued, by rank, as a result of the AR 15-6 investigation findings relating to the incident in Niger in 2017. The report shall be submitted in a format that protects personally identifiable information and is consistent with national security.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a not-for-profit entity or federally funded research and development center independent of the Department of Defense to conduct an assessment of the sufficiency of resources available to United States Southern Command and United States Africa Command to carry out their respective missions.
(b) Matters to be included.—The assessment described in subsection (a) shall include—
(1) an assessment of the sufficiency of the resources available to United States Southern Command and United States Africa Command, including personnel, human resources, and financial resources, in promoting United States national security interests;
(2) an assessment of the level of regional expertise and experience of the leadership of each such combatant command and their subordinate organizations, service components, and task forces, to include personnel from agencies other than the Department of Defense;
(c) Access to information.—The not-for-profit entity or federally funded research and development center with which the Secretary enters into the contract under subsection (a) shall have full and direct access to all information related to resources available to United States Southern Command and United States Africa Command.
(d) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 240 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the not-for-profit entity or federally funded research and development center with which the Secretary of Defense enters into the contract under subsection (a) shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development a report that contains the assessment required by subsection (a).
Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act may be construed to authorize the use of military force.
Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act may be construed to authorize the use of military force against Venezuela.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The Government of Turkey has indicated in a communication to Congress that there remains an opportunity to meet Turkey’s requirement for an air and missile defense capability through the acquisition of the Patriot system from the United States.
(2) The acquisition of the Patriot system could remove the need to acquire the S-400 air and missile defense system from Russia, which is incompatible with the integrated air and missile defense system of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and should preclude Turkey’s participation in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) consortium program with the United States.
(b) Sense of Congress.—Congress—
(1) supports the efforts of the United States Government to achieve a satisfactory arrangement with Turkey by which Turkey acquires the Patriot system to defend its airspace, which would preserve Turkey as a production partner in the F-35 JSF consortium program;
(2) encourages the Department of Defense to secure the deployment of a Patriot system to Turkey, under United States or NATO operational control, for the purpose of providing Turkey with an interim capability to address urgent vulnerabilities in Turkey’s air and missile defense during the period in which an agreement is reached for Turkey’s acquisition of the Patriot system; and
Congress finds the following:
(1) Russia seeks to diminish the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and recreate its sphere of influence in Europe using coercion, intimidation, and outright aggression.
(3) The illegal occupation of Crimea by Russia and its continued engagement of destabilizing and subversive activities against independent and free states is of increasing concern.
(4) Russia also continues to disregard treaties, international laws and rights to freedom of navigation, territorial integrity, and sovereign international borders.
(5) Russia’s continued occupation of Georgian and Ukrainian territories and the sustained military buildup in Russia’s Western Military District and Kaliningrad has threatened continental peace and stability.
(6) The Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are particularly vulnerable to an increasingly aggressive and subversive Russia.
(7) In a declaration to celebrate 100 years of independence of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania issued on April 3, 2018, the Trump Administration reaffirmed United States commitments to these Baltic countries to “improve military readiness and capabilities through sustained security assistance” and “explore new ideas and opportunities, including air defense, bilaterally and in NATO, to enhance deterrence across the region”.
(8) These highly valued NATO allies of the United States have repeatedly demonstrated their commitment to advancing mutual interests as well as those of the NATO alliance.
(9) The Baltic countries also continue to participate in United States-led exercises to further promote coordination, cooperation, and interoperability among allies and partner countries, and continue to demonstrate their reliability and commitment to provide for their own defense.
It is the sense of Congress as follows:
(1) The United States is committed to the security of the Baltic countries and should strengthen cooperation and support capacity-building initiatives aimed at improving the defense and security of such countries.
(2) The United States should lead a multilateral effort to develop a strategy to deepen joint capabilities with Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, NATO allies, and other regional partners, to deter against aggression from Russia in the Baltic region, specifically in areas that would strengthen interoperability, joint capabilities, and military readiness necessary for Baltic countries to strengthen their national resilience.
(a) In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly conduct a comprehensive, multilateral assessment of the military requirements of such countries to deter and resist aggression by Russia that—
(1) provides an assessment of past and current initiatives to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, readiness and interoperability of Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia’s national defense capabilities; and
(2) assesses the manner in which to meet those objectives, including future resource requirements and recommendations, by undertaking activities in the following areas:
(A) Activities to increase the rotational and forward presence, improve the capabilities, and enhance the posture and response readiness of the United States or forces of NATO in the Baltic region.
(D) Activities to improve command and control capabilities through increasing communications, technology, and intelligence capacity and coordination, including secure and hardened communications.
(b) Report.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State jointly shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, which shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex, that includes each of the following:
(1) A report on the findings of the assessment conducted pursuant to subsection (a).
(3) An assessment of the resource requirements to achieve the objectives described in subsection (a)(1) with respect to the national defense capability of Baltic countries, including potential investments by host countries.
(4) A plan for the United States to use appropriate security cooperation authorities or other authorities to—
(A) facilitate relevant recommendations included in the list described in paragraph (2);
(B) expand joint training between the Armed Forces and the military of Lithuania, Latvia, or Estonia, including with the participation of other NATO allies; and
(C) support United States foreign military sales and other equipment transfers to Baltic countries especially for the activities described in subparagraphs (A) through (I) of subsection (a)(2).
Of the $338,700,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711), the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:
Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b) Use.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the Defense Health Program for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(a) Authority for transfer of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1405 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $127,500,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(b) Use of transferred funds.—For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).
The purpose of this title is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, military personnel accounts, as specified in the funding table in section 4402.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act.
(a) Authority To transfer authorizations.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2019 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(a) Continuation of prior authorities and notice and reporting requirements.—Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2020 shall be subject to the conditions contained in—
(1) subsections (b) through (f) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428); and
(2) section 1521(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2577).
(b) Equipment disposition.—
(1) ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may accept equipment that is procured using amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund by this Act and is intended for transfer to the security forces of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior of the Government of Afghanistan, but is not accepted by such security forces.
(2) CONDITIONS ON ACCEPTANCE OF EQUIPMENT.—Before accepting any equipment under the authority provided by paragraph (1), the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall make a determination that such equipment was procured for the purpose of meeting requirements of the security forces of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior of the Government of Afghanistan, as agreed to by both the Government of Afghanistan and the Government of the United States, but is no longer required by such security forces or was damaged before transfer to such security forces.
(3) ELEMENTS OF DETERMINATION.—In making a determination under paragraph (2) regarding equipment, the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall consider alternatives to the acceptance of such equipment by the Secretary. An explanation of each determination, including the basis for the determination and the alternatives considered, shall be included in the relevant quarterly report required under paragraph (5).
(4) TREATMENT AS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STOCKS.—Equipment accepted under the authority provided by paragraph (1) may be treated as stocks of the Department of Defense upon notification to the congressional defense committees of such treatment.
(5) QUARTERLY REPORTS ON EQUIPMENT DISPOSITION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 90-day period thereafter during which the authority provided by paragraph (1) is exercised, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the equipment accepted during the period covered by such report under the following:
(ii) Section 1521(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2575).
(iii) Section 1531(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1088).
(iv) Section 1532(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3613).
(v) Section 1531(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).
(c) Security of Afghan women.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2020, it is the goal that $45,500,000, but in no event less than $10,000,000, shall be used for—
(2) TYPES OF PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.—Such programs and activities may include—
(A) efforts to recruit and retain women into the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces, including the special operations forces;
(B) programs and activities of the Directorate of Human Rights and Gender Integration of the Ministry of Defense of Afghanistan and the Office of Human Rights, Gender and Child Rights of the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan;
(C) development and dissemination of gender and human rights educational and training materials and programs within the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan;
(D) efforts to address harassment and violence against women within the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces;
(d) Assessment of Afghanistan progress on objectives.—
(1) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED.—Not later than June 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate an assessment describing—
(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—In conducting the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall include each of the following:
(A) A consideration of the extent to which the Government of Afghanistan has a strategy for, and has taken steps toward, increased accountability and the reduction of corruption within the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan.
(B) A consideration of the extent to which the capability and capacity of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces have improved as a result of Afghanistan Security Forces Fund investment, including through training, and an articulation of the metrics used to assess such improvements.
(C) A consideration of the extent to which the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces have been able to increase pressure on the Taliban, al-Qaeda, the Haqqani network, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria-Khorasan, and other terrorist organizations, including by re-taking territory, defending territory, and disrupting attacks.
(D) A consideration of the distribution practices of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces and whether the Government of Afghanistan is ensuring that supplies, equipment, and weaponry supplied by the United States are appropriately distributed to, and employed by, security forces charged with fighting the Taliban and other terrorist organizations.
(E) A consideration of the extent to which the Government of Afghanistan has designated the appropriate staff, prioritized the development of relevant processes, and provided or requested the allocation of resources necessary to support a peace and reconciliation process in Afghanistan.
(F) A description of the ability of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Interior of Afghanistan to manage and account for previously divested equipment, including a description of any vulnerabilities or weaknesses of the internal controls of such Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Interior and any plan in place to address shortfalls.
(G) A description of the monitoring and evaluation systems in place to ensure assistance provided under subsection (a) is used only for the intended purposes.
(H) A description of any significant irregularities in the divestment of equipment to the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces during the period beginning on May 1, 2019, and ending on May 1, 2020, including any major losses of such equipment or any inability on the part of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces to account for equipment so procured.
(I) A description of the sustainment and maintenance costs required during the period beginning on May 1, 2019, and ending on May 1, 2020, for major weapons platforms previously divested, and a plan for how the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces intends to maintain such platforms in the future.
(J) A consideration of the extent to which the Government of Afghanistan is adhering to conditions for receiving assistance established in annual financial commitment letters or any other bilateral agreements with the United States.
(3) FORM.—The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(4) WITHHOLDING OF ASSISTANCE FOR INSUFFICIENT PROGRESS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of Defense determines, in coordination with the Secretary of State and pursuant to the assessment under paragraph (1), that the Government of Afghanistan has made insufficient progress in the areas described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall—
(B) WAIVER.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that withholding such assistance would impede the national security objectives of the United States by prohibiting, restricting, delaying, or otherwise limiting the provision of assistance, the Secretary may waive the withholding requirement under subparagraph (A) if the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of State, certifies such determination to Congress not later than 30 days before the effective date of the waiver.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) ensuring opportunities for future competition in the National Security Space Launch program of the Air Force will decrease the overall cost of the program and increase the likelihood of success with respect to the Department of Defense stopping the use of Russian-made RD–180 rocket engines, as required by section 1608 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note); and
(b) Phase two acquisition strategy.—In carrying out the phase two acquisition strategy, the Secretary of the Air Force—
(1) shall ensure, except as provided by subsection (c), that launch services are procured only from National Security Space Launch providers that are offerors using launch vehicles or families of launch vehicles that meet all of the requirements of the Air Force for the delivery of all required payloads to all reference orbits; and
(c) Competitive procedures.—If the Secretary of the Air Force awards phase two contracts for more than a total of 29 launches, the Secretary shall ensure that each such contract for any launch after the 29th launch is awarded using competitive procedures among all National Security Space Launch providers.
(d) Funding for certification and infrastructure.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Pursuant to section 2371b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Air Force shall enter into an agreement described in paragraph (2) with either National Security Space Launch providers that have not entered into a phase two contract for launch services occurring before fiscal year 2022 or National Security Space Launch providers that have entered into a phase two contract but have not entered into a launch services agreement for such phase, or both.
(e) Down select notification.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, in coordination with the Secretary of the Air Force, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees written notification of the two National Security Space Launch providers selected during fiscal year 2020 by the Secretary of the Air Force to be awarded phase two contracts not later than 10 days before the Secretary publicly announces such selection. The notification shall include, at a minimum—
(f) Report.—Not later than 45 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force awards phase two contracts during fiscal year 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on—
(g) Definitions.—In this section:
(a) Preparation.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall take actions necessary to prepare to implement the plan developed pursuant to section 1603 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2584) regarding using allied launch vehicles to meet the requirements for achieving the policy relating to assured access to space set forth in section 2273 of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Actions required.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1) identify the satellites of the United States that would be appropriate to be launched on an allied launch vehicle;
(2) assess the relevant provisions of Federal law, regulations, and policies governing the launch of national security satellites and determine whether any legislative, regulatory, or policy actions (including with respect to waivers) would be necessary to allow for the launch of a national security satellite on an allied launch vehicle; and
(c) Submission to Congress.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on preparing to implement the plan described in subsection (a), including information regarding each action required by paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (b).
Section 1618(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is amended by striking “for a fiscal year” and inserting “for each fiscal year preceding fiscal year 2029”.
(a) NRO.—
(1) PROCUREMENT.—The Director of the National Reconnaissance Office shall procure a modernized pathfinder program free-flyer satellite that—
(2) PLAN.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director, in coordination with the Secretary of the Air Force, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a plan for the Director to procure and launch the satellite under paragraph (1), including with respect to—
(b) Air Force.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that the electro-optical/infrared weather system satellite—
(a) Prototype Multi-GNSS program.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish under the Space Development Agency a program to prototype an M-code based, multi-global navigation satellite system receiver that is capable of receiving covered signals to increase the resilience and capability of military position, navigation, and timing equipment against threats to the Global Positioning System and to deter the likelihood of attack on the worldwide Global Positioning System by reducing the benefits of such an attack.
(b) Elements.—In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1) with respect to each covered signal that could be received by the prototype receiver under such program, conduct an assessment of the relative benefits and risks of using that signal, including with respect to any existing or needed monitoring infrastructure that would alert users of the Department of Defense of potentially corrupted signal information, and the cyber risks and challenges of incorporating such signals into a properly designed receiver;
(2) ensure that monitoring systems are able to include any monitoring network of the United States or allies of the United States;
(3) conduct an assessment of the benefits and risks, including with respect to the compatibility of non-United States global navigation satellite system signals with existing position, navigation, and timing equipment of the United States, and the extent to which the capability to receive such signals would impact current receiver or antenna design; and
(4) conduct an assessment of the desirability of establishing such program in a manner that—
(c) Briefing.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Space Development Agency, in coordination with the Air Force GPS User Equipment Program office, shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on a plan to carry out the program under subsection (a) that includes—
(d) Report.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report containing—
(1) an explanation of how the Secretary intends to comply with section 1609 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2110);
(2) an outline of any potential cooperative efforts acting in accordance with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the European Union, or Japan that would support such compliance;
(e) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for increment 2 of the acquisition of military Global Positioning System user equipment terminals, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the briefing has been provided under subsection (c) and the report has been submitted under subsection (d).
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(3) The term “M-code” means, with respect to global navigation satellite system signals, military code that provides enhanced positioning, navigation, and timing capabilities and improved resistance to existing and emerging threats, such as jamming.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The Secretary of the Air Force is responsible for developing the hardware and software systems to provide space situational awareness data to the Commander of the United States Strategic Command to meet warfighter requirements.
(2) There have been significant delays and cost increases in the program of record that underpin space situational awareness.
(3) The Secretary terminated the Joint Space Operations Center Mission Center and decided to operationally accept the Joint Space Operations Center Mission Center Increment 2 despite the fact that only three of 12 planned capabilities in Joint Space Operations Center Mission Center Increment 2 were accepted for use in operations.
(4) Multiple commercial vendors have the current capability to detect, maintain custody of, and provide analytical products that can address the warfighter space situational awareness requirements that were not filled in the Joint Space Operations Center Mission Center and that have been impacted by significant delays in the program of record.
(b) Procurement.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Space Development Agency shall procure commercial space situational awareness services by awarding at least two contracts for such services.
(c) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the enterprise space battle management command and control, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense, without delegation, certifies to the congressional committees that the Secretary has awarded the contracts under subsection (b).
(d) Report.—Not later than January 31, 2020, the Director of the Space Development Agency, in coordination with the Secretary of the Air Force, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on using commercial space situational awareness services to fill the space situational awareness requirements that were not filled in the Joint Space Operations Center Mission Center. The report shall include the following:
(1) A description of current domestic commercial capabilities to detect and track space objects in low earth orbit below the 10 centimeter threshold of legacy systems.
(e) Commercial space situational awareness services defined.—In this section, the term “commercial space situational awareness services” means commercial space situational awareness processing software and data to address warfighter requirements and fill gaps in current space situational capabilities of the Air Force.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(2) While the United States must invest in capabilities to defend such systems in the event of an attack in space, the United States must also identify and implement policies that will reduce the likelihood of such an attack.
(b) Independent study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center or other independent entity to conduct a study on deterrence in space.
(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The study under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A) An assessment of the existing range of major studies and writings on space deterrence and a comprehensive comparative analysis of the conclusions of such studies and writings.
(B) An examination, using appropriate analytical tools, of the approaches proposed by such studies and writings with respect to creating conditions of deterrence suitable for use in the space domain, including, at a minimum, an assessment of all aspects of deterrence in space, including varying classification, strategies to deny benefit or impose cost, and space mission assurance (including resilience, active defense, and reconstitution).
(c) Assessment by Defense Policy Board.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Policy Board shall submit to the Secretary of Defense an assessment of the study under subsection (b)(1), including, at a minimum—
(d) Report.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report that contains the following:
(3) Based on such study and assessment, a description of any changes to the policies, programs, and plans of the Department of Defense that the Secretary recommends to enhance deterrence in space, including with respect to—
(A) considerations and decision on reducing the opportunities and incentives for adversaries to attack space systems of the United States or allies of the United States;
(B) new architectures, including proliferated systems, hosted payloads, non-traditional orbits, and reconstitution among others;
(C) appropriate uses of partnering with both commercial entities and allies to improve deterrence in space;
(D) necessary capabilities to enhance the protection of space systems to achieve improved deterrence;
(E) bilateral, multilateral, and unilateral measures, including confidence-building measures, that could be taken to reduce the risk of miscalculation that would lead to an attack in space;
(e) Briefing.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a briefing on the study under subsection (b)(1) and the assessment under subsection (c).
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Air Force, to advance the security of the space assets of the Department of Defense, should—
(1) expand on complimentary efforts within the Air Force that promote the adoption of a resilient enterprise ground architecture that is responsive to new and changing threats and can rapidly integrate new capabilities to make the warfighting force of the United States more resilient in a contested battlespace; and
(b) Future architecture.—The Secretary of Defense shall, to the extent practicable—
(1) develop future satellite ground architectures of the Department of Defense to be compatible with complimentary commercial systems that can support uplink and downlink capabilities with dual-band spacecraft; and
(2) emphasize that future ground architecture transition away from stove-piped systems to a service-based platform that provides members of the Armed Forces with flexible and adaptable capabilities that—
(a) ISR Integration Council.—Subsection (a) of section 426 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(a) ISR Integration Council.— (1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall establish an Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Integration Council—
“(A) to assist the Secretary of Defense in carrying out the responsibilities of the Secretary under section 105(a) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3038(a));
“(B) to assist the Under Secretary with respect to matters relating to—
“(2) The Council shall be composed of—
(b) Annual briefings.—Such section is further amended by striking subsections (b) and (c) and inserting the following new subsection (b):
“(b) Annual briefings on the intelligence and counterintelligence requirements of the combatant commands.— (1) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees a briefing on the following:
“(A) The intelligence and counterintelligence requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of each of the relevant combatant commands.
“(B) For the year preceding the year in which the briefing is provided, the fulfillment rate for each of the relevant combatant commands of the validated intelligence and counterintelligence requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of such combatant command.
“(C) A risk analysis identifying the critical gaps and shortfalls in efforts to address operational and strategic requirements of the Department of Defense that would result from the failure to fulfill the validated intelligence and counterintelligence requirements of the relevant combatant commands.
“(D) A mitigation plan to balance and offset the gaps and shortfalls identified under subparagraph (C), including with respect to spaceborne, airborne, ground, maritime, and cyber intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.
“(E) For the year preceding the year in which the briefing is provided—
“(i) the number of intelligence and counterintelligence requests of each commander of a relevant combatant command determined by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to be a validated requirement, and the total of capacity of such requests provided to each such commander;
“(ii) with respect to such validated requirements—
“(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall provide to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees a briefing on short-, mid-, and long-term strategies to address the validated intelligence and counterintelligence requirements of the relevant combatant commands, including with respect to spaceborne, airborne, ground, maritime, and cyber intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.
“(3) The briefings required by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be provided at the same time that the President’s budget is submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025.
“(4) In this subsection:
“(A) The term ‘congressional intelligence committees’ has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
“(B) The term ‘Defense Intelligence Enterprise’ means the organizations, infrastructure, and measures, including policies, processes, procedures, and products, of the intelligence, counterintelligence, and security components of each of the following:
“(C) The term ‘fulfillment rate’ means the percentage of combatant command intelligence and counterintelligence requirements satisfied by available, acquired, or realigned intelligence and counterintelligence capabilities or activities.
“(D) The term ‘intelligence community’ has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).”.
(a) Survey and review.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, in coordination with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Director of National Intelligence, shall—
(A) review the organization, posture, current and planned investments, and processes of the intelligence collections capabilities and activities, for the purpose of assessing the sufficiency, integration, and interoperability of such capabilities and activities to support the current and future requirements of the Department of Defense; and
(B) conduct a survey of each geographic and functional combatant command, with respect to intelligence collections capabilities and activities, to assess—
(ii) whether the posture of such capabilities and activities is sufficient to address the requirements of the Department of Defense;
(2) ELEMENTS.—The survey and review under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A comprehensive assessment of intelligence collections capabilities and activities, and whether such capabilities and activities—
(i) are appropriately postured and sufficiently resourced to meet current and future requirements of the Department of Defense;
(B) With respect to each geographic and functional combatant command—
(i) information on the gaps and deficiencies, by specific intelligence capability type, described in paragraph (1)(B)(iii);
(ii) a review of the alignment of such gaps and deficiencies with the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance submissions to the integrated priorities list for the period beginning with the completion of the most recent readiness reviews conducted by the Joint Staff and ending on the date of the commencement of the survey and review under subsection (a); and
(b) Report.—
(1) SUBMISSION.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the findings of the Under Secretary with respect to the survey and review under subsection (a)(1).
(2) CONTENT.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) an evaluation of—
(i) the organization, posture, current and planned investments, and processes of the intelligence collections capabilities and activities, including the extent to which such capabilities and activities enable the geographic and functional combatant commands to meet the operational and strategic requirements of the Department of Defense;
(ii) the use or planned use by each geographic and functional combatant command of intelligence collections capabilities and activities available to such command to address operational and strategic requirements of the Department of Defense;
(iii) the gaps and deficiencies described in subsection (a)(1)(B)(iii), if any, that prohibit each geographic and functional combatant command from the most effective use of the intelligence collections capabilities and activities to address priority requirements of the Department of Defense;
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) The term “combat support agency” has the meaning given that term in section 193(f) of title 10, United States Code.
(3) The term “Defense Intelligence Enterprise” has the meaning given that term in section 1633(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2600).
(4) The term “intelligence collections capabilities and activities” means the totality of intelligence collections systems and processes which enable the tasking, processing, exploitation, and dissemination capabilities, capacity, and activities of the Defense Intelligence Enterprise.
(5) The term “intelligence community” has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(6) The term “congressional intelligence committees” has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
Section 811(a) of the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 (50 U.S.C. 1911(a)) is amended—
Section 395 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting “, signed by the Secretary,” after “written notification”; and
(2) in subsection (c)—
Subsection (b) of section 484 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 1644 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting “, not later than December 31, 2022, and quadrennially thereafter,” before “conduct”;
(5) in subsection (e), by striking “period beginning on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date that is 10 years after such date of enactment” and inserting “each eight-year period that begins from the date of each review conducted under subsection (a)”.
Section 1648 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense for the White House Communications Agency, not more than 90 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until the initiation of the tier 1 exercise required under subsection (a).”.
Section 1647 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:
“(f) Written notification.—If the Secretary determines that the Department will not complete an evaluation of the cyber vulnerabilities of each major weapon system of the Department by the date specified in subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committee written notification relating to each such incomplete evaluation. Such a written notification shall include the following:
“(g) Report.—The Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, shall provide a report to the congressional defense committees upon completion of the requirement for an evaluation of the cyber vulnerabilities of each major weapon system of the Department under this section. Such report shall include the following:
“(2) An identification of current and planned efforts to address the cyber vulnerabilities of each major weapon system requiring mitigation, including efforts across the doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, and facilities of the Department.
“(3) A description of joint and common cyber vulnerability mitigation solutions and efforts, including solutions and efforts across the doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, and facilities of the Department.
“(4) A description of lessons learned and best practices regarding evaluations of the cyber vulnerabilities and cyber vulnerability mitigation efforts relating to major weapon systems.
“(5) A description of efforts to share lessons learned and best practices regarding evaluations of the cyber vulnerabilities and cyber vulnerability mitigation efforts of major weapon systems across the Department.
“(6) An identification of measures taken to institutionalize evaluations of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems.
“(7) Information relating to guidance, processes, procedures, or other activities established to mitigate or address the likelihood of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems by incorporation of lessons learned in the research, development, test, evaluation, and acquisition cycle, including promotion of cyber education of the acquisition workforce.
Paragraph (1) of section 1652(k) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232) is amended by striking “2019” and inserting “2020”.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense and each Secretary concerned may obligate and expend not more than $3,000,000 of amounts authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance in each of fiscal years 2020 through 2022 to carry out cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects.
(b) Certification.—For each development project initiated under the authority provided for in subsection (a), the Commander of U.S. Cyber Command shall certify to the congressional defense committees that each project is determined to be cyber operations-peculiar.
(c) Notification.—Not later than 15 days after exercising the authority provided for in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees of such exercise.
(d) Report.—Not later than December 31 of each year through 2022, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on expenditures made pursuant to the authority provided for in subsection (a). Each such report shall include a full description and evaluation of each of the cyber operations-peculiar capability development projects that is the subject of each such expenditure, definitions and standards for cyber operations-peculiar requirements, transition plans, and any other matters the Secretary determines relevant.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide written notification to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate of authorities delegated to the Secretary by the President for military operations in cyberspace that are otherwise held by the National Command Authority, not later than 15 days after any such delegation. Such notification shall include the following:
(2) A description of relevant documents, including execute orders, issued by the Secretary in accordance with such authorities.
(b) Procedures.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate procedures for complying with the requirements of subsection (a), consistent with the national security of the United States and the protection of operational integrity. The Secretary shall promptly notify the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate in writing of any changes to such procedures at least 14 days prior to the adoption of any such changes.
(2) SUFFICIENCY.—The Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate shall ensure that committee procedures designed to protect from unauthorized disclosure classified information relating to national security of the United States are sufficient to protect the information that is submitted to the committees pursuant to this section.
(3) NOTIFICATION IN EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE.—In the event of an unauthorized disclosure of authorities covered by this section, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate are notified immediately. Notification under this paragraph may be verbal or written, but in the event of a verbal notification, a written notification signed by the Secretary shall be provided by not later than 48 hours after the provision of such verbal notification.
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services, not more than 85 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, certifies to the congressional defense committees that the recommendations in the Audit of Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services Security Safeguards (DODIG-2019-072) have been implemented.
(a) In general.—Not later than March 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a written report detailing all military cyberspace operations conducted in the previous calendar year. For each such operation each such report shall include the following:
(4) An identification of the Cyber Mission Force team, or other Department of Defense entity or unit, that conducted such operation, and supporting teams, entities, or units.
(b) Classification.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide each report required under subsection (a) at a classification level the Secretary determines appropriate.
(a) Report.—Not later than May 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on efforts, and roles and responsibilities, relating to cybersecurity in the Defense Industrial Base.
(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Definitions for “Controlled Unclassified Information” (CUI) and “For Official Use Only” (FOUO), as well as policies regarding protecting information designated as such.
(2) A comprehensive list of Department of Defense programs to assist the Defense Industrial Base with cybersecurity compliance requirements of the Department.
(3) An evaluation of the resources and utilization of Department programs to assist the Defense Industrial Base in complying with cybersecurity compliance requirements referred to in paragraph (2).
(4) Optimal levels of resourcing required for activities, programs, and other Department efforts to assess and monitor compliance by the Defense Industrial Base with such cybersecurity compliance requirements.
(5) Roles and responsibilities of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Management Officer, the Director of the Protecting Critical Technologies Task Force, and the Secretaries of the military services relating to the following:
(6) Efforts to enhance the Department’s visibility into its entire supply chain without violating privity.
(7) An evaluation of methodologies to tier cybersecurity requirements for the Defense Industrial Base relative to risk.
(8) Efforts to support and enhance threat information sharing between the Department and the Defense Industrial Base.
(c) Definition.—In this section, the term “Defense Industrial Base” includes traditional and non-traditional defense contractors and academic institutions with contractual relationships with the Department of Defense related to activities involving information or technology requiring cybersecurity compliance.
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and quarterly thereafter, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of National Intelligence shall provide to the congressional defense committees and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate briefings on the nature of the National Security Agency and United States Cyber Command’s current and future partnership. Briefings under this section shall terminate on January 1, 2022.
(b) Elements.—Each briefing under this section shall include the following:
(1) Status updates on the current and future National Security Agency-United States Cyber Command partnership efforts.
(2) Executed documents, written memoranda of agreements or understandings, and policies issued governing such current and future partnership.
(4) Updates related to the assessment required under section 1642 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (relating to limitation on termination of dual-hat arrangement for Commander of the United States Cyber Command; Public Law 114–328).
(a) Extension.—Section 1043(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), as most recently amended by section 1670 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2157), is further amended in paragraph (1) by striking “2023” and inserting “2024”.
(b) Acquisition costs.—Paragraph (2) of such section is amended—
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the following new subparagraphs:
“(G) For the 10-year period following the date of the report, an estimate of the relative percentage of acquisition costs of the military departments, and of the entire Department of Defense, represented by the costs to the Department of Defense to modernize and recapitalize the nuclear weapons enterprise.
(c) Transfer of provision.—
(1) CODIFICATION.—Such section 1043, as amended by subsections (a) and (b), is—
(A) transferred to chapter 24 of title 10, United States Code;
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 24 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 492 the following new item:
“492a. Annual report on the plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control system.”.
Section 179 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(g) Semiannual briefings.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, and semiannually thereafter, the Council shall—
“(1) provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on, with respect to the period covered by the briefing—
“(B) a summary of any decisions made by the Council pursuant to subsection (d) at each such meeting, except with respect to budget decisions relating to the budget of the President for a fiscal year if the request for that fiscal year has not been submitted to Congress as of the date of the briefing; and
Subsection (a) of section 217 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 706), as amended by section 1662 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2152), is amended to read as follows:
Section 1656(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1124) is amended—
Section 1664 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2615), as most recently amended by section 1666 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232), is amended by striking “for any of fiscal years 2017 through 2020” and inserting “for any of fiscal years 2017 through 2030”.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Department of Defense may be used to deploy the W76–2 low-yield warhead.
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committee, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report containing the following:
(a) Plan.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a plan on the future of the nuclear command, control, and communications systems.
(b) Matters included.—The plan under subsection (a) shall address the following:
(1) Near- and long-term plans and options to recapitalize the nuclear command, control, and communications systems to ensure the resilience of such systems.
(3) The risks and benefits of replicating the current architecture for such systems as of the date of the plan.
(4) The risks and benefits of using different architectures for such systems, including, at a minimum, using hosted payloads.
(6) Requirements and plans to ensure the security of the supply chain of nuclear command, control, and communications systems.
(a) Study.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study on the United States adopting a policy to not use nuclear weapons first.
(b) Matters included.—The study under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the benefits of a policy to not use nuclear weapons first in reducing the risk of miscalculation in a crisis.
(2) An assessment of the likely reactions of the allies of the United States with respect to the United States adopting such a policy and how any negative reactions could be mitigated, including the value of engaging such allies to offer credible extended deterrence assurances.
(5) An assessment of the benefits and risks of such a policy with respect to nuclear nonproliferation.
(c) Submission to DOD.—Not later than 210 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the federally funded research and development center shall submit to the Secretary the study under subsection (a).
(d) Submission to Congress.—Not later than 240 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate the study under subsection (a), without change.
(a) Study.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study on the potential risks of nuclear terrorism and nuclear war.
(b) Matters included.—The study under subsection (a) shall—
(1) quantify the potential risks of nuclear terrorism and nuclear war, including the level of uncertainty;
(3) assess the role that quantitative risk analysis and other disciplines can play in quantifying such risks, including the limitations of such analysis and disciplines;
(a) Policy.—Subsection (a) of section 1681 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Policy.—It is the policy of the United States to—
(b) Briefing.—Not later than January 31, 2020, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on the programmatic impacts across the Department of Defense with respect to the implementation of the Missile Defense Review issued in 2019.
(a) Development.—Section 1683 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h), as subsections (e), (f), (g), (h), and (j), respectively; and
(b) Updated plan.—Such section is further amended by inserting after subsection (h), as redesignated by subsection (a), the following new subsection:
“(i) Updated plan.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the Director of the Space Development Agency and the Secretary of the Air Force, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an update to the plan under subsection (h), including the following:
“(1) How the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the Director of the Space Development Agency and the Secretary, will develop the payload under subsection (d) and include such payload in the sensor architecture developed under subsection (a).
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the Director of the Missile Defense Agency must address the technical issues of the redesigned kill vehicle prior to moving forward with development, procurement, and fielding of the vehicle.
(b) Modifications to waiver requirements.—Subsection (b) of section 1683 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2163) is amended to read as follows:
“(b) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense, without delegation, may waive subsection (a) if—
“(2) the Secretary conducts an assessment of the missile developments of both North Korea and Iran during the 18-month period preceding the date of the waiver;
“(3) the Secretary determines that the threat of missiles is advancing at a pace that requires additional capacity of the ground-based midcourse defense system by 2023, including in light of the assessment conducted under paragraph (2);
“(4) the Secretary determines that the waiver is appropriate in light of the assessment conducted by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation under subsection (c);
Section 1688 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is amended—
(a) Independent study.—
(1) ASSESSMENT.—In accordance with paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study assessing—
(A) the organization of the Missile Defense Agency under the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering pursuant to section 205(b) of title 10, United States Code;
(2) SCOPE OF STUDY.—Before entering into the contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees an update on the scope of such study.
(b) Notification on changes to non-standard acquisition processes and responsibilities.—
(1) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Secretary of Defense may be obligated or expended to change the non-standard acquisition processes and responsibilities described in paragraph (2) until—
(2) NON-STANDARD ACQUISITION PROCESSES AND RESPONSIBILITIES DESCRIBED.—The non-standard acquisition processes and responsibilities described in this paragraph are such processes and responsibilities described in—
(A) the memorandum of the Secretary of Defense titled “Missile Defense Program Direction” signed on January 2, 2002;
(c) Limitation on certain transfers of billets.—During fiscal year 2020, the Secretary of Defense may not transfer civilian or military billets from the Missile Defense Agency to any element of the Department under the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering until, for each such transfer—
(a) Designation.—The Secretary shall designate the preferred location of a missile defense site in the contiguous United States from among the locations evaluated pursuant to section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1678). The Secretary shall make such designation based on the following:
(1) The environmental impact statement prepared pursuant to section 227 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1678).
(b) Report.—Not later than January 31, 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the designation made under subsection (a) with respect to each factor specified in paragraphs (1) through (5) of such subsection.
(c) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section may be construed—
(d) Conforming repeal.—Section 1681 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1776) is repealed.
(a) Construction of homeland defense radar–Hawaii.—Subject to subsection (b), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency may use funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Missile Defense Agency to design, build, and integrate the foundation of the homeland defense radar in Hawaii and the thermal control system of the radar.
(b) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for research, development, test, and evaluation for the homeland defense radar in Hawaii, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until the Director—
(2) submits to the congressional defense committees an assessment conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers on the research, development, test, and evaluation proposal to design, build, and integrate the foundation of the radar and the thermal control system of the radar that highlights any unique components of such proposal; and
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the Army for the lower tier air and missile defense sensor, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Army submits the report under subsection (b).
(b) Report.—The Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the test and demonstration of lower tier air and missile defense sensors that occurred during the third quarter of fiscal year 2019. Such report shall include the following:
(1) An explanation of how the test and demonstration was conducted and what the test and demonstration set out to achieve, including—
(2) An explanation of the capability of the sensor system that the Secretary determined to be the winner of the test and demonstration, including with respect to—
(a) Limitation on sale.—The Director of the Missile Defense Agency may not pursue release of the command and control, battle management, and communications program (or any variants thereof) for export until the date on which the Director submits the report under subsection (b).
(b) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report containing the following:
(1) An explanation of the rationale of the Director for considering to export the command and control, battle management, and communications program (or any variants thereof) in light of the critical role of the program in the strategic national defense of the United States and the allies of the United States against ballistic missile attack.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that operational test and evaluation of elements of the ballistic missile defense system should be conducted thoroughly in accordance with section 2399 of title 10, United States Code, including with respect to the reports required to be submitted to the congressional defense committees under subsection (b) of such section regarding the results of testing conducted on major defense acquisition programs.
(b) Annual assessment.—As part of the annual report of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation submitted to Congress under section 139 of title 10, United States Code, the Director shall include an assessment of the ballistic missile defense system and all of the elements of the system that have been fielded or are planned, as of the date of the assessment, including—
Section 1696(b) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2171) is amended—
Section 1694(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1792) is repealed.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(b) Repeal.—Section 1691 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1786) is repealed.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy has not adequately responded to Congress regarding the miscalculation and ambiguity risks posed by hypersonic weapons, specifically from submarine-launched platforms, including pursuant to the report required by section 1698 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2172); and
(2) the Secretary of Defense should coordinate technology maturation efforts to develop common technologies for hypersonics, and should leverage defense laboratories and university partners to lead foundational hypersonic research in areas the Secretary determines appropriate for the Department of Defense.
(b) Prohibition.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the conventional prompt global strike weapon system may be used for a submarine-launched conventional prompt global strike capability, including with respect to developing or testing such a capability, unless such capability—
(c) Report.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the programmatic changes required to integrate the conventional prompt global strike weapon system into the DDG–1000 program or other surface ships.
This division may be cited as the “Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020”.
(a) Expiration of authorizations after five years.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXX (other than title XXVIII) for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—
(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—
Titles XXI through XXX (other than title XXVIII) shall take effect on the later of—
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation | Amount |
| Alabama | Redstone Arsenal | $38,000,000 |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $71,000,000 |
| Georgia | Fort Gordon | $107,000,000 |
| Hunter Army Airfield | $62,000,000 | |
| Kentucky | Fort Campbell | $61,300,000 |
| Kwajalein | Kwajalein Atoll | $40,000,000 |
| Massachusetts | Natick Soldier Systems Center | $50,000,000 |
| Michigan | Detroit Arsenal | $24,000,000 |
| New York | Fort Drum | $44,000,000 |
| North Carolina | Fort Bragg | $12,500,000 |
| Oklahoma | Fort Sill | $73,000,000 |
| Pennsylvania | Carlisle Barracks | $98,000,000 |
| South Carolina | Fort Jackson | $88,000,000 |
| Texas | Corpus Christi Army Depot | $86,000,000 |
| Fort Hood | $50,500,000 | |
| Virginia | Fort Belvoir | $60,000,000 |
| Joint Base Langley-Eustis | $55,000,000 | |
| Washington | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | $46,000,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Amount |
| Honduras | Soto Cano Air Base | $34,000,000 |
(c) Study of near-term facility alternatives to house high value detainees.—
(1) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study of alternatives to meet the near-term facility requirements to safely and humanely house high value detainees current detained at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. As part of the study, the Secretary shall consider the following alternatives:
(2) SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1). The report shall be unclassified, but may include a classified annex.
(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installation, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| State/Country | Installation | Units | Amount |
| Pennsylvania | Tobyhanna Army Depot | Family Housing Replacement Construction | $19,000,000 |
(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $9,222,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(a) Anniston Army Depot, Alabama.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2241) for Anniston Army Depot, Alabama, for construction of a weapon maintenance shop, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (132 Stat. 2401), the Secretary of the Army may construct a 21,000-square foot weapon maintenance shop.
(b) United States Military Academy, New York.—The table in section 2101(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2241) is amended in the item relating to the United States Military Academy, New York, by striking “$160,000,000” and inserting “$197,000,000” for construction of a Consolidated Engineering Center and Parking Structure rather than the separate projects specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (132 Stat. 2401).
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Arizona | Marine Corps Air Station Yuma | $ 189,760,000 |
| California | Camp Pendleton | $185,569,000 |
| Marine Corps Air Station Miramar | $37,400,000 | |
| Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake | $64,500,000 | |
| Navel Base Coronado | $165,830,000 | |
| Naval Base San Diego | $9,900,000 | |
| Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach | $123,310,000 | |
| Travis Air Force Base | $64,000,000 | |
| Connecticut | Naval Submarine Base New London | $72,260,000 |
| Florida | Blount Island | $18,700,000 |
| Naval Air Station Jacksonville | $32,420,000 | |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $226,000,000 |
| Hawaii | Marine Corps Air Station Kaneohe Bay | $134,050,000 |
| Naval Ammunition Depot West Loch | $53,790,000 | |
| Maryland | Saint Inigoes | $15,000,000 |
| North Carolina | Camp Lejeune | $217,440,000 |
| Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point | $114,570,000 | |
| Marine Corps Air Station New River | $11,320,000 | |
| Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | $66,000,000 |
| South Carolina | Parris Island | $37,200,000 |
| Virginia | Marine Corps Base Quantico | $143,350,000 |
| Naval Station Norfolk | $128,100,000 | |
| Portsmouth Naval Shipyard | $48,930,000 | |
| Yorktown Naval Weapons Station | $59,000,000 | |
| Washington | Bremerton | $51,010,000 |
| Keyport | $25,050,000 |
(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Japan | Fleet Activities Yokosuka | $174,692,000 |
| Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni | $15,870,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $5,863,000.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $41,798,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
The table in section 2201(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2691) is amended in the item relating to Bangor, Washington, by striking “$113,415,000” and inserting “$161,415,000” for construction of a SEAWOLF Class Service Pier, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (130 Stat. 2876).
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alaska | Eielson Air Force Base | $8,600,000 |
| Arkansas | Little Rock Air Force Base | $47,000,000 |
| California | Travis Air Force Base | $43,100,000 |
| Colorado | Peterson Air Force Base | $54,000,000 |
| Schriever Air Force Base | $148,000,000 | |
| United States Air Force Academy | $49,000,000 | |
| Georgia | Moody Air Force Base | $12,500,000 |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $65,000,000 |
| Illinois | Scott Air Force Base | $100,000,000 |
| Mariana Islands | Tinian | $316,000,000 |
| Missouri | Whiteman Air Force Base | $27,000,000 |
| Montana | Malmstrom Air Force Base | $235,000,000 |
| Nevada | Nellis Air Force Base | $65,200,000 |
| New Mexico | Holloman Air Force Base | $20,000,000 |
| Kirtland Air Force Base | $37,900,000 | |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $207,300,000 |
| Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph | $36,000,000 | |
| Utah | Hill Air Force Base | $114,500,000 |
| Washington | Fairchild-White Bluff | $31,000,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Australia | Tindal | $70,600,000 |
| Cyprus | Royal Air Force Akrotiri | $27,000,000 |
| Japan | Yokota Air Base | $12,400,000 |
| United Kingdom | Royal Air Force Lakenheath | $14,300,000 |
(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installation, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Units | Amount |
| Germany | Spangdahlem Air Base | Family Housing Construction | $53,584,000 |
(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $3,409,000.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $53,584,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(a) Fiscal year 2015 project authority.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3679) for Royal Air Force Croughton, United Kingdom, for Phase 1 of the Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex consolidation, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (128 Stat. 3973), the Secretary of the Air Force shall carry out the construction at Royal Air Force Molesworth, United Kingdom.
(b) Fiscal year 2016 project authority.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1153), for Royal Air Force Croughton, United Kingdom, for Phase 2 of the Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex consolidation, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (129 Stat. 1294), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 5,152-square meter Intelligence Analytic Center, a 5,234-square meter Intelligence Fusion Center, and a 807-square meter Battlefield Information Collection and Exploitation System Center at Royal Air Force Molesworth, United Kingdom.
(c) Fiscal year 2017 project authority.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2697), for Royal Air Force Croughton, United Kingdom, for Phase 3 of the Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex consolidation, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (130 Stat. 2878), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 1,562-square meter Regional Joint Intelligence Training Facility and a 4,495-square meter Combatant Command Intelligence Facility at Royal Air Force Molesworth, United Kingdom.
(d) Conforming repeal.—Section 2305 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2247) is repealed.
The table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1152) is amended in the item relating to Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, by striking “$68,950,000” and inserting “$72,050,000” for construction of F-35A Munitions Maintenance Facilities, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (129 Stat. 1293).
The table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2696) is amended in the item relating to Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington, by striking “$27,000,000” and inserting “$31,800,000” for construction of a SERE School Pipeline Dormitory, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (130 Stat. 2878).
(a) Little rock air force base, Arkansas.—The table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1825) is amended in the item relating to Little Rock Air Force Base, Arkansas, by striking “$20,000,000” and inserting “$27,000,000” for construction of a dormitory facility, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (131 Stat. 2002).
(b) Joint base San Antonio, Texas.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1826) for Joint Base San Antonio, Texas, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct—
(c) F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming.—The table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1825) is amended in the item relating to F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming, by striking “$62,000,000” and inserting “$80,100,000” for construction of a Consolidated Helo/TRF Ops/AMU and Alert Facility, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (131 Stat. 2004).
(d) Rygge air station, Norway.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2903 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1876) for Rygge Air Station, Norway, for replacement/expansion of a Quick Reaction Alert Pad, as specified in the funding table in section 4602 of such Act (131 Stat. 2014), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 1,327 square meters of aircraft shelter and a 404-square meter fire protection support building.
(e) Incirlik air base, Turkey.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2903 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115–91; 131 Stat. 1876) for Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, for Relocating Base Main Access Control Point, as specified in the funding table in section 4602 of such Act (131 Stat. 2015), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 176-square meter pedestrian search building.
(a) Hanscom air force base, Massachusetts.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2246) for Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, for the construction of a semi-conductor/microelectronics laboratory facility, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (132 Stat. 2405), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 1,000 kilowatt stand-by generator.
(b) Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota.—The table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2246) is amended in the item relating to Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, by striking “$66,000,000” and inserting “$71,500,000” for construction of a Consolidated Helo/TRF Ops/AMU and Alert Facility, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (132 Stat. 2405).
(c) Royal air force lakenheath, United Kingdom.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2247) for Royal Air Force Lakenheath, United Kingdom, for the construction of an F–35A Dormitory, as specified in the funding table in section 4601 of such Act (132 Stat. 2405), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a 5,900-square meter dormitory.
(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| California | Beale Air Force Base | $33,700,000 |
| Camp Pendleton | $17,700,000 | |
| Florida | Eglin Air Force Base | $16,500,000 |
| Hurlburt Field | $108,386,000 | |
| Naval Air Station Key West | $16,000,000 | |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $19,200,000 |
| Hawaii | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | $67,700,000 |
| Maryland | Fort Detrick | $27,846,000 |
| Mississippi | Columbus Air Force Base | $16,800,000 |
| North Carolina | Camp Lejeune | $13,400,000 |
| Fort Bragg | $84,103,000 | |
| Oklahoma | Tulsa International Airport | $18,900,000 |
| Rhode Island | Quonset State Airport | $11,600,000 |
| South Carolina | Joint Base Charleston | $33,300,000 |
| South Dakota | Ellsworth Air Force Base | $24,800,000 |
| Virginia | Defense Distribution Depot Richmond | $98,800,000 |
| Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek - Fort Story | $45,604,000 | |
| Pentagon | $28,802,000 | |
| Training Center Dam Neck | $12,770,000 | |
| Washington | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | $47,700,000 |
| Wisconsin | General Mitchell International Airport | $25,900,000 |
| CONUS Classified | Classified Location | $82,200,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Germany | Geilenkirchen Air Base | $30,479,000 |
| Japan | Yokota Air Base | $136,411,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a), the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy resiliency and energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States.
(a) Authorization.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Authority to recognize NATO authorization amounts as budgetary resources for project execution.—When the United States is designated as the Host Nation for the purposes of executing a project under the NATO Security Investment Program (NSIP), the Department of Defense construction agent may recognize the NATO project authorization amounts as budgetary resources to incur obligations for the purposes of executing the NSIP project.
Pursuant to agreement with the Republic of Korea for required in-kind contributions, the Secretary of Defense may accept military construction projects for the installations or locations in the Republic of Korea, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Component | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Army | Camp Carroll | Army Prepositioned Stock-4 Wheeled Vehicle Maintenance Facility | $51,000,000 |
| Army | Camp Humphreys | Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing, P1 | $154,000,000 |
| Army | Camp Humphreys | Unaccompanied Enlisted Personnel Housing, P2 | $211,000,000 |
| Army | Camp Humphreys | Satellite Communications Facility | $32,000,000 |
| Air Force | Gwangju Air Base | Hydrant Fuel System | $35,000,000 |
| Air Force | Kunsan Air Base | Upgrade Electrical Distribution System | $14,200,000 |
| Air Force | Kunsan Air Base | Dining Facility | $21,000,000 |
| Air Force | Suwon Air Base | Hydrant Fuel System | $24,000,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Alabama | Anniston Army Depot | $34,000,000 |
| Foley | $12,000,000 | |
| California | Camp Roberts | $12,000,000 |
| Idaho | Orchard Combat Training Center | $29,000,000 |
| Maryland | Havre De Grace | $12,000,000 |
| Massachusetts | Camp Edwards | $9,700,000 |
| Minnesota | New Ulm | $11,200,000 |
| Mississippi | Camp Shelby | $8,100,000 |
| Missouri | Springfield | $12,000,000 |
| Nebraska | Bellevue | $29,000,000 |
| New Hampshire | Concord | $5,950,000 |
| New York | Jamaica Armory | $91,000,000 |
| Pennsylvania | Moon Township | $23,000,000 |
| Vermont | Jericho | $30,000,000 |
| Washington | Richland | $11,400,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Delaware | Newark Army Reserve Center | $21,000,000 |
| Wisconsin | Fort McCoy | $25,000,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Louisiana | New Orleans | $25,260,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| California | Moffett Air National Guard Base | $57,000,000 |
| Georgia | Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport | $24,000,000 |
| Missouri | Rosecrans Memorial Airport | $9,500,000 |
| Puerto Rico | Luis Munoz-Marin International Airport | $50,000,000 |
| Wisconsin | Truax Field | $34,000,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Georgia | Robins Air Force Base | $43,000,000 |
| Maryland | Joint Base Andrews | $15,000,000 |
| Minnesota | Minneapolis-St. Paul IAP | $9,800,000 |
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2019, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(a) Prohibition.—Military construction funds may not be obligated, expended, or otherwise used to design or carry out a project to construct, replace, or modify a wall, fence, or other physical barrier along the international border between the United States and Mexico.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FUNDS.—The term “military construction funds” means—
(A) amounts authorized to be appropriated for a military construction project authorized in this division or authorized in any Military Construction Authorization Act for any of fiscal years 2015 through 2019, including any amounts of such an authorization made available to the Department of Defense and transferred to another authorization by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to transfer authority available to the Secretary; and
(a) Limitation on amount of funds available for national emergency.—Section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection:
“(c) Limitation on amount of funds available for national emergency.— (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, the total cost of all military construction projects undertaken using that authority during the national emergency may not exceed $500,000,000.
“(2) In the event of a national emergency declaration in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) will be used only within the United States, the total cost of all military construction projects undertaken using that authority during the national emergency may not exceed $100,000,000.”.
(b) Additional condition on source of funds.—Section 2808(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding after the second sentence the following:
“(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the Secretary may determine that funds appropriated for military construction are unexecutable if—
(c) Waiver of other provisions of law.—Section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (c), as added by subsection (a), the following new subsection:
“(d) Waiver of other provisions of law in event of national emergency.—In the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, the authority provided by such subsection to waive or disregard another provision of law that would otherwise apply to a military construction project authorized by this section may be used only if—
(d) Additional notification requirements.—Subsection (e) of section 2808 of title 10, United States Code, as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), is amended—
(1) by striking “of the decision” and all that follows through the end of the subsection and inserting the following: of the following:
“(A) The reasons for the decision to use the construction authority described in subsection (a), including, in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency, the reasons why use of the armed forces is required in response to the declared national emergency.
“(B) The construction projects to be undertaken using the construction authority described in subsection (a), including, in the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency, an explanation of how each construction project directly supports the immediate security, logistical, or short-term housing and ancillary supporting facility needs of the members of the armed forces used in the national emergency.
“(C) The estimated cost of the construction projects to be undertaken using the construction authority described in subsection (a), including the cost of any real estate action pertaining to the construction projects, and certification of compliance with the funding conditions imposed by subsections (b) and (c).
“(D) Any determination made pursuant to subsection (d)(2) to waive or disregard another provision of law to undertake any construction project using the construction authority described in subsection (a).
“(E) The military construction projects, including any military family housing and ancillary supporting facility projects, to be canceled or deferred in order to provide funds to undertake construction projects using the construction authority described in subsection (a) and the possible impact of the cancellation or deferment of such military construction projects on military readiness and the quality of life of members of the armed forces and their dependents.”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) In the event of a declaration by the President of a national emergency in which the construction authority described in subsection (a) is used, a construction project to be undertaken using such construction authority may be carried out only after the end of the five-day period beginning on the date the notification required by paragraph (1) is received by the appropriate committees of Congress.”.
(a) Military installation resilience.—Section 2864 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting “military installation resilience,” after “master planning,”;
(3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:
“(c) Military installation resilience component.—To address military installation resilience under subsection (a)(1), each installation master plan shall discuss the following:
“(1) Risks and threats to military installation resilience that exist at the time of the development of the plan and that are projected for the future, including from extreme weather events, mean sea level fluctuation, wildfires, flooding, and other changes in environmental conditions.
“(2) Assets or infrastructure located on the military installation vulnerable to the risks and threats described in paragraph (1), with a special emphasis on assets or infrastructure critical to the mission of the installation and the mission of members of the armed forces.
“(3) Lessons learned from the impacts of extreme weather events, including changes made to the military installation to address such impacts, since the prior master plan developed under this section.
“(4) Ongoing or planned infrastructure projects or other measures, as of the time of the development of the plan, to mitigate the impacts of the risks and threats described in paragraph (1).
“(5) Community infrastructure and resources located outside the installation (such as medical facilities, transportation systems, and energy infrastructure) that are—
“(6) Agreements in effect or planned, as of the time of the development of the plan, with public or private entities for the purpose of maintaining or enhancing military installation resilience or resilience of the community infrastructure and resources described in paragraph (5).
“(7) Projections from recognized governmental and scientific entities such as the Census Bureau, the National Academies of Sciences, the United States Geological Survey, and the United States Global Change Research Office (or any similar successor entities) with respect to future risks and threats (including the risks and threats described in paragraph (1)) to the resilience of any project considered in the installation master plan during the 50-year lifespan of the installation.”.
Section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(f) (1) If a proposed military construction project has the potential to significantly affect tribal lands, sacred sites, or tribal treaty rights, the Secretary concerned shall initiate consultation with the tribal government of each impacted Indian tribe—
“(B) to determine whether the adverse impacts can be avoided or mitigated in the design and implementation of the project; and
“(C) if the adverse impacts cannot be avoided, to develop feasible measures to mitigate the impacts and estimate the cost of the mitigation measures.
“(2) As part of the Department of Defense Form 1391 submitted to the appropriate committees of Congress for a military construction project covered by paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned shall include a description of the current status of the consultation conducted under such paragraph and specifically address each of the items specified in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of such paragraph.
“(3) In this subsection:
“(A) The term ‘Indian tribe’ has the meaning given that term in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304).
(a) Amendment required.—Not later than September 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall amend the Unified Facility Criteria related to military construction planning and design to ensure that building practices and standards promote military installation resilience, energy resilience, energy and climate resiliency, and cyber resilience.
(b) Conditional availability of funds pending initiation of amendment process.—Not more than 25 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020 for Department of Defense planning and design accounts related to military construction projects may be obligated until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a certification that the Secretary has initiated the process to amend the Unified Facility Criteria to comply with the requirements of subsection (a) and intends to complete the amendment process by the date specified in such subsection.
(c) Implementation of Unified Facilities Criteria amendment.—
(1) IMPLEMENTATION.—Any Department of Defense Form 1391 submitted to Congress after the date specified in subsection (a) must be in compliance with the Unified Facility Criteria, amended as required by subsection (a).
(2) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall certify to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate that the amendment required by subsection (a) and the amendment required by section 2805(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 2864 note) have been completed and fully incorporated into military construction planning and design.
(d) Annual review.—Beginning with fiscal year 2022, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review comparing the Unified Facility Criteria and industry best practices to ensure that military construction building practices and standards related to military installation resilience, energy resilience, energy and climate resiliency, and cyber resilience remain current.
(a) Modification.—
(1) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall modify Department of Defense Form 1391 to require, with respect to any proposed major or minor military construction project requiring congressional notification or approval, the inclusion of a certification by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned that the proposed military construction project takes into consideration—
(2) ELEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION.—As part of the certification required by paragraph (1) for a proposed military construction project, the Secretary concerned shall identify the potential changes in environmental conditions, such as increasingly frequent extreme weather events, considered and addressed under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1).
(b) Relation to recent modification requirement.—The modification of Department of Defense Form 1391 required by subsection (a) is in addition to, and expands upon, the modification of Department of Defense Form 1391 with respect to flood risk disclosure for military construction required by section 2805(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (division B of Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2262; 10 U.S.C. 2802 note).
(a) Specified rights of tenancy in privatized military housing units.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 2886 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 2886. Specified rights of tenancy in military housing units
“(a) Contract requirement for military housing units.—
“(1) INCLUSION OF RIGHTS OF TENANCY.—Each contract between the Secretary concerned and a landlord shall guarantee the rights of tenancy specified in this section for military tenants who reside in military housing units covered by the contract.
“(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The rights of tenancy in military housing units specified in this section are not intended to be exclusive. The omission of a tenant right or protection shall not be construed to deny the existence of such a right or protection for military tenants.
“(3) WRITTEN LEASE AND EXPLANATION OF TENANCY.— (A) The lease between a landlord and military tenant shall be in writing to establish tenancy in a military housing unit. The landlord shall provide the military tenant with a copy of the lease, any addendums, and any other regulations imposed by the landlord regarding occupancy of the military housing unit and use of common areas.
“(B) The Secretary concerned shall require that a military tenant receive a plain-language briefing regarding the rights of tenancy guaranteed by this section and the respective responsibilities of landlords and military tenants related to tenancy, including the existence of any additional fees authorized by subsection (c)(2), any utilities payments, the procedures for submitting and tracking work orders, the identity of the military tenant advocate, and the dispute resolution process.
“(b) Protection against retaliation.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—A landlord may not retaliate against a military tenant, directly or through the chain-of-command of a member of the armed forces who is a military tenant, in response to a military tenant making a complaint relating to a military housing unit or common areas. Evidence of retaliation may include any of the following actions, including unsuccessful attempts to commit such an action:
“(c) Prohibition against collection of amounts in addition to rent.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—A landlord may not impose on a military tenant a supplemental payment, such as an out-of-pocket fee, in addition to the amount of rent the landlord charges for a unit of similar size and composition to the military housing unit, without regard to whether or not the amount of the member's basic allowance for housing under section 403 of title 37 is less than the amount of the rent.
“(2) EXCEPTIONS.—Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed—
“(A) to prohibit a landlord from imposing an additional payment—
“(i) for optional services provided to military tenants, such as access to a gym or a parking space;
“(B) to limit or otherwise affect the authority of the Secretary concerned to enter into rental guarantee agreements under section 2876 of this title or to make differential lease payments under section 2877 of this title, so long as such agreements or payments do not require a military tenant to pay an out-of-pocket fee or payment in addition to the basic allowance for housing of the member.
“(d) Dispute resolution process.—
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary concerned shall establish a dispute resolution process for the resolution of disputes between landlords and military tenants related to military housing units. The resolution process shall use neutral arbitrators and minimize costs incurred by military tenants to participate.
“(2) TREATMENT OF BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING.—During the dispute resolution process between a landlord and military tenant, the Secretary concerned may withhold from the landlord amounts of the military tenant’s basic allowance for housing under section 403 of title 37 that otherwise would be paid to the landlord directly by the military tenant or through allotments of the pay of the military tenant under section 701 of such title.
“(e) Prompt Maintenance and repairs.—
“(2) ELECTRONIC WORK ORDER SYSTEM.—To promote the policy objective described in paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned shall require the establishment of an electronic work order system through which a military tenant may request maintenance or repairs of a military housing unit and track the progress of the work.
“(f) Disclosure of housing code violations and hazards.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Before accepting a rental application from a prospective military tenant to lease a military housing unit, the landlord must disclose to the prospective military tenant the following:
“(A) Any housing code violations with respect to the military housing unit incurred within the previous three years.
“(B) Either a three–year history of mold contamination with respect to the military housing unit and common areas or proof of proper remediation.
“(C) Either a three–year history of lead contamination in water with respect to the military housing unit and common areas or proof of proper remediation.
“(D) Either a three–year history of rodent infestation with respect to the military housing unit and common areas or proof of proper remediation.
“(E) Any information regarding health-related symptoms among previous residents of the military housing unit that may have been the result of exposure to environmental hazards in the military housing unit or common areas, if such residents agreed to voluntarily disclose such information. The military tenant advocate shall inform military tenants of their option to disclose or decline to disclose such information.
“(g) Unit inspections.—
“(h) Military tenant advocates.— (1) (A) The Secretary concerned shall assign personnel of the Department of Defense or contractor personnel to serve as a military tenant advocate—
“(ii) to serve as a liaison between military tenants and landlords, officials in the chain of command at the installation, and the individual designated in paragraph (2) within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, with respect to concerns of military tenants at the applicable installation.
“(B) A military tenant advocate may not be an employee of a landlord or occupy office-space provided by a landlord.
“(2) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall designate an individual within the Office of the Secretary of Defense to serve as the liaison between the Secretary and the Secretaries concerned, the military tenant advocates under paragraph (1), landlords, and other offices of the Department as the Secretary determines appropriate with respect to military tenant issues.
“(B) Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, and annually thereafter for the next two years, the individual designated under subparagraph (A) shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees a report containing a description of—
(b) Definitions.—Section 2871 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraphs:
“(7) The term ‘landlord’ means an eligible entity that enters into a contract as a partner with the Secretary concerned for the acquisition or construction of a military housing unit under this subchapter or any subsequent lessor who owns, manages, or is otherwise responsible for a military housing unit.
(c) Implementation report.—Not later than March 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report containing a plan to implement section 2886 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a). In the report, the Secretary shall identify any circumstances that would impede application of the requirements of such section to existing contracts for the acquisition or construction of military family housing units or military unaccompanied housing units under subchapter IV of chapter 169 of such title, and to existing contracts for the management of such military housing units.
(a) Nondisclosure agreements prohibited.—Section 2882 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) Prohibition on use of nondisclosure agreements.— (1) A member of the armed forces who leases a housing unit acquired or constructed under this subchapter, and any dependent of the member who is a party to a lease for such a unit or is authorized to act on behalf of the member in the event of the assignment or deployment of the member, may not be required to sign a nondisclosure agreement in connection with entering into, continuing, or terminating the lease. Any such agreement against the interests of the member is invalid.
Section 2872a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
(a) Fall prevention device requirements.—Section 2879(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “that protect against unintentional window falls by young children and that are in compliance with applicable International Building Code (IBC) standards” and inserting “described in paragraph (3)”;
(a) Hazard assessment tool.—
(1) DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop an assessment tool, such as a rating system or similar mechanism, to identify and measure health and safety hazards in housing under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense (including privatized housing).
(2) COMPONENTS.—The assessment tool shall provide for the identification and measurement of the following hazards:
(3) PUBLIC FORUMS.—In developing the assessment tool, the Secretary of Defense shall provide for multiple public forums at which the Secretary may receive input with respect to such assessment tool from occupants of housing under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense (including privatized housing).
(b) Hazard assessments.—
(1) ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, using the assessment tool developed under subsection (a)(1), shall complete a hazard assessment for each housing facility under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense (including privatized housing).
(2) TENANT INFORMATION.—As soon as practicable after the completion of the hazard assessment conducted for a housing facility under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall provide to each individual who leases or is assigned to a housing unit in the facility a summary of the results of the assessment.
(a) Process required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall develop a process to identify, record, and resolve environmental health hazards in housing under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense (including privatized housing) in a timely manner.
(b) Elements of process.—The process developed under subsection (a) shall provide for the following with respect to each identified environmental health hazard:
(a) Report required.—Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the following:
(1) An evaluation of the extent to which shortages in the number of civilian personnel performing oversight functions at Department of Defense housing management offices or assigned to housing-related functions at headquarters levels contribute to problems regarding the management of military housing constructed or acquired using the alternative authority for the acquisition and improvement of military housing under subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code.
(2) Recommendations to address such personnel shortages in order to eliminate management problems regarding such military housing, ensure oversight of the partner’s execution of the housing agreement and the delivery of all requirements in accordance with implementing guidance provided by the Secretaries of the military departments, improve oversight of and expedite the work-order process, and facilitate a positive experience for members of the Armed Forces and their dependents who reside in military housing.
(b) Personnel recommendations.—As part of the recommendations required by subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) determine the number of additional personnel who are required, the installation and headquarter locations at which they will be employed, the employment positions they will fill, and the duties they will perform;
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until 2022, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall—
(a) Inspection authority.—Section 2885 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(g) Post-construction access and inspection authority.—
“(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary concerned shall retain the authority after the completion of a military housing privatization project to access and inspect any military housing unit, ancillary supporting facility, or common area acquired, constructed, or renovated as part of the project in order to protect the health and safety of members of the armed forces and their dependents who occupy the privatized military housing units.
“(2) NOTICE AND RIGHT OF REFUSAL OF ACCESS AND INSPECTION.—The Secretary concerned shall ensure that the individuals who lease or are assigned a military housing unit—
(b) Retroactive application of amendment.—Subsection (g) of section 2885 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply to each military housing privatization project completed prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, and to each such project completed on or after such date.
(a) Complaint database and financial transparency.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sections:
“(a) Database required.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a database that is available to the public of complaints relating to housing units under this subchapter.
“(b) Filing of complaints.—The Secretary shall ensure that a tenant of a housing unit under this subchapter may file a complaint relating to such housing unit for inclusion in the database under subsection (a).
“(a) Audits of agreements with partners.— (1) Not less frequently than annually, the Comptroller General of the United States, in accordance with best audit practices, shall randomly select one small, medium, and large military installation participating in the Military Privatized Housing Initiative for the purposes of conducting a full financial audit of the privatized housing project or projects at each installation. The results of audits conducted under this section shall be provided to the Secretary of Defense and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IV of chapter 169 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2886 the following new items:
(b) Annual reports on privatized military housing.—Section 2884 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) Annual report on housing.— (1) Not less frequently than annually, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees and publish on a publicly available website of the Department of Defense a report on housing units under this subchapter, disaggregated by military installation.
“(2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
“(A) An assessment of the condition of housing units under this subchapter based on the average age of those units and the estimated time until recapitalization.
“(C) An assessment of maintenance response times and completion of maintenance requests relating to such housing units.
“(D) An assessment of dispute resolution relating to such housing units, which must include an analysis of all denied tenant requests to withhold rent payments, or where the dispute resolution process resulted in a favorable outcome for the housing provider.
(a) Prohibition on use of certain energy source.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each contract for the acquisition of furnished energy for a covered military installation in Europe does not use natural gas sourced from inside the Russian Federation as a means of generating the furnished energy for the covered military installation.
(b) Waiver for national security interests.—
(1) WAIVER AUTHORITY; CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary of Defense may waive application of subsection (a) to a specific contract for the acquisition of furnished energy for a covered military installation if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(2) SUBMISSION OF WAIVER NOTICE.—Not later than 14 days before the execution of any energy contract for which a waiver is granted under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of the waiver. The waiver notice shall include the following:
Section 1050 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended—
(1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection:
“(a) Access to facilities for credentialed transportation workers.—The Secretary of Defense, to the extent practicable—
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah or a designee of the State of Utah (in this section referred to as the “State”) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 35 acres located at Hill Air Force Base (commonly known as the Defense Nontactical Generator and Rail Center), and such real property adjacent to the Center as the parties consider to be appropriate, for the purpose of permitting the State to construct a new interchange for Interstate 15.
(b) Condition of conveyance.—As a condition on the conveyance authorized by subsection (a), the State shall agree to the following:
(1) That, not later than two years after the date of the conveyance of the property under such subsection, the State, at no cost to the United States, shall—
(2) That, as part of the construction of the new Interstate 15 interchange referred to in subsection (a), the State, at no cost to the United States, shall construct on the property a new gate for Hill Air Force Base in compliance with such construction, security, and other requirements as the Secretary of the Air Force considers to be necessary.
(c) Environmental obligations.—The State shall not have any obligation in relation to any environmental conditions on the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) unless—
(d) Payment of costs of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall require the State to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts collected are in advance of the Secretary incurring actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance, or to an appropriate fund or account currently available to the Secretary for the purposes for which the costs were paid. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(a) Release of conditions and retained interests.—With respect to a parcel of real property at Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas, consisting of approximately 141.52 acres and conveyed by the United States to the State of Arkansas pursuant to the Act entitled “An Act authorizing the transfer of part of Camp Joseph T. Robinson to the State of Arkansas”, approved June 30, 1950 (64 Stat. 311, chapter 429), the Secretary of the Army may release, without consideration, the terms and conditions imposed by the United States and the reversionary interest retained by the United States under section 2 of such Act and the right to reenter and use the property retained by the United States under section 3 of such Act.
(b) Condition of release.—As a condition of the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a) and subject to subsection (c), the State of Arkansas shall agree to convey, without consideration, the parcel of real property described in subsection (a) to the Arkansas Department of Veterans Affairs for the purpose of expanding the Arkansas State Veterans Cemetery in North Little Rock, Arkansas.
(c) New Reversionary Interest.—The conveyance required by subsection (b) of the real property described in subsection (a) shall include a reversionary interest to protect the interests of the United States. Under the terms of such reversionary interest, if the Secretary of the Army determines at any time that the real property conveyed pursuant to subsection (b) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the real property, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto the real property. A determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(d) Instrument of release and description of property.—The Secretary of the Army may execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate instrument reflecting the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a). The exact acreage and legal description of the property described in this section shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.
(e) Payment of administrative costs.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army may require the State of Arkansas to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the release. If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the State.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received under subsection (a) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release of terms and conditions and retained interests under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the release. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(a) In general.—Section 2 of Public Law 85–236 (71 Stat. 517) is amended in the first sentence by inserting after “for other military purposes” the following: “and for purposes of meeting the needs of the homeless (as that term is defined in section 103 of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11302))”.
(b) Modification of use.—
(1) APPLICATION.—The State of California shall submit to the Administrator of General Services an application for use of the property conveyed by section 2 of Public Law 85–236 for purposes of meeting the needs of the homeless in accordance with the amendment made by subsection (a).
(2) REVIEW OF APPLICATION.—Not later than 60 days after the date of receipt of an application pursuant to paragraph (1), the Administrator and the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall jointly determine whether the use of the property described in the application is a use for purposes of meeting the needs of the homeless.
(3) MODIFICATION OF INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE.—If the Administrator and the Secretary jointly determine that the use of the property described in the application is for purposes of meeting the needs of the homeless, the Administrator shall execute and record in the appropriate office an instrument of modification of the deed of conveyance executed pursuant to Public Law 85–236 in order to authorize such use of the property. The instrument shall include such additional terms and conditions as the Administrator considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(4) COMPATIBILITY WITH MILITARY PURPOSES.—Before executing any instrument of modification of the deed of conveyance, the Administrator and the Secretary shall request a review by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, to ensure that any modification of the use of the property described in the application is compatible with the training of members of the National Guard and other military purposes.
(a) Public notice required.—Section 2942(b)(2) of the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 (title XXIX of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1036) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(D) PUBLIC NOTICE.—Not later than one year before the date on which a 30-day period of Secretary of the Navy management of the Shared Use Area will start, the Secretary of the Navy, acting through the Resource Management Group established pursuant to section 2944, shall notify the public of the start date and the intention of the Armed Forces to use the Shared Use Area for military training purposes. The Secretary of the Navy, upon notice to the Secretary of the Interior, may waive such public notice in the event of an emergent military training requirement.”.
(b) Application of amendment.—Subparagraph (D) of section 2942(b)(2) of the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 (title XXIX of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1036), as added by subsection (a), shall apply to periods of Secretary of the Navy management of the Shared Use Area of the Johnson Valley Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area under such section that start on or after January 1, 2021.
This subtitle may be cited as the “White Sands National Park Establishment Act”.
In this subtitle:
(1) MAP.—The term “Map” means the map entitled “White Sands National Park Proposed Boundary Revision & Transfer of Lands Between National Park Service & Department of the Army”, numbered 142/136,271, and dated February 14, 2017.
(2) MILITARY MUNITIONS.—The term “military munitions” has the meaning given the term in section 101(e) of title 10, United States Code.
(3) MISSILE RANGE.—The term “Missile Range” means the White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, administered by the Secretary of the Army.
(4) MONUMENT.—The term “Monument” means the White Sands National Monument, New Mexico, established by Presidential Proclamation No. 2025 (54 U.S.C. 320301 note), dated January 18, 1933, and administered by the Secretary of the Interior.
(5) MUNITIONS DEBRIS.—The term “munitions debris” has the meaning given the term in volume 8 of the Department of Defense Manual Number 6055.09–M entitled “DoD Ammunitions and Explosives Safety Standards” and dated February 29, 2008 (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act).
Congress finds the following:
(1) White Sands National Monument was established on January 18, 1933, by President Herbert Hoover pursuant to the Antiquities Act of 1906 (now chapter 3203 of title 54, United States Code).
(2) President Hoover proclaimed that the Monument was established “for the preservation of the white sands and additional features of scenic, scientific, and educational interest”.
(3) The Monument was expanded by Presidents Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Carter, and Clinton in 1934, 1942, 1953, 1978, and 1996, respectively.
(4) The Monument contains a substantially more diverse set of nationally significant historical, archaeological, scientific, and natural resources than were known of at the time the Monument was established, including a number of recent discoveries.
(a) Establishment.—To protect, preserve, and restore its scenic, scientific, educational, natural, geological, historical, cultural, archaeological, paleontological, hydrological, fish, wildlife, and recreational values and to enhance visitor experiences, there is established the White Sands National Park as a unit of the National Park System.
(c) References.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to White Sands National Monument shall be considered to be a reference to White Sands National Park.
(d) Availability of funds.—Any funds available for the Monument shall be available for the National Park.
(e) Administration.—The Secretary of the Interior shall administer the National Park in accordance with—
(2) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including section 100101(a), chapter 1003, sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101, and chapter 3201 of title 54, United States Code.
(f) Effect.—Nothing in this section affects—
(4) the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense regarding the restricted airspace above the National Park; or
(5) the airshed classification of the National Park under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
(a) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction to the Secretary of the Interior.—
(b) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction to the Secretary of the Army.—
(c) Administration.—
(d) Infrastructure; resource management.—
(1) RANGE ROAD 7.—
(A) INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT.—To the maximum extent practicable, in planning, constructing, and managing infrastructure on the land described in subparagraph (C), the Secretary of the Army shall apply low-impact development techniques and strategies to prevent impacts within the Missile Range and the National Park from stormwater runoff from the land described in that subparagraph.
(B) RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.—The Secretary of the Army shall—
(i) manage the land described in subparagraph (C) in a manner consistent with the protection of natural and cultural resources within the Missile Range and the National Park and in accordance with section 101(a)(1)(B) of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a(a)(1)(B)), division A of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code, and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.); and
(e) Research.—The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior may enter into an agreement to allow the Secretary of the Interior to conduct certain research in the area identified as “Cooperative Use Research Area” on the Map.
(f) Military munitions and munitions debris.—
(1) RESPONSE ACTION.—With respect to any Federal liability, the Secretary of the Army shall remain responsible for any response action addressing military munitions or munitions debris on the land transferred under subsection (a) to the same extent as on the day before the date of enactment of this Act.
(2) INVESTIGATION OF MILITARY MUNITIONS AND MUNITIONS DEBRIS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may request that the Secretary of the Army conduct one or more investigations of military munitions or munitions debris on any land transferred under subsection (a).
(3) APPLICABLE LAW.—Any activities undertaken under this subsection shall be carried out in accordance with—
(A) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.);
(a) National Park.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the National Park is revised to reflect the boundary depicted on the Map.
(b) Missile range.—
(c) Conforming amendment.—Section 2854 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 54 U.S.C. 320301 note), relating to the modification of boundaries of the Monument and the Missile Range, is repealed.
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that portable fire extinguishers are installed and maintained in all Department of Defense facilities in accordance with requirements of national model fire codes developed by the National Fire Protection Association and the International Code Council that require redundancy and extinguishers throughout occupancies regardless of the presence of other suppression systems or alarm systems.
Paragraph (4) of section 2391(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) Report required.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on vulnerabilities from sea level rise to covered installations located outside of the continental United States.
(b) Contents.—For each covered installation, the report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An analysis of the impacts to the operations, contingency plans, and readiness of such installation from a sea level rise.
(a) Requirement.—Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a black start exercise at three Joint Bases at which such exercise has not previously been conducted, for the purpose of identifying any shortcomings in infrastructure, joint operations, joint coordination, and security that would result from a loss of power at the site.
(b) Report.—Not later than June 1, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains a discussion of lessons learned from black start exercises conducted by the Secretary of Defense during the period beginning with the first such exercise and ending on December 31, 2019, including the three most recurring issues identified as a result of such exercises with respect to infrastructure, joint coordination efforts, and security.
(c) Black start exercise defined.—In this section, the term “black start exercise” means, with respect to a military installation, an exercise in which commercial utility power at the installation is dropped before backup generation assets start, for the purpose of—
(a) Authorization.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Location | Amount |
| Cuba | Guantanamo Bay Naval Station | $33,800,000 |
| Unspecified Europe | European Deterrence Initiative: Various Locations | $98,342,000 |
(b) Report required as condition of authorization.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a plan to carry out each military construction project authorized in the final item in the table in subsection (a) for an unspecified location for the European Deterrence Initiative. The plan shall include a Department of Defense Form 1391 for each proposed project. The Secretary may not commence a project until the report has been submitted.
(a) Authorization.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Location | Amount |
| Bahrain | SW Asia | $53,360,000 |
| Italy | Sigonella | $77,400,000 |
| Spain | Rota | $69,570,000 |
| Unspecified Europe | European Deterrence Initiative: Various Locations | $56,246,000 |
(b) Report required as condition of authorization.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a plan to carry out each military construction project authorized in the final item in the table in subsection (a) for an unspecified location for the European Deterrence Initiative. The plan shall include a Department of Defense Form 1391 for each proposed project. The Secretary may not commence a project until the report has been submitted.
(a) Authorization.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Location | Amount |
| Iceland | Keflavik | $57,000,000 |
| Jordan | Azraq | $66,000,000 |
| Spain | Moron | $8,500,000 |
| Unspecified Europe | European Deterrence Initiative: Various | $231,246,000 |
(b) Report required as condition of authorization.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a plan to carry out each military construction project authorized in the final item in the table in subsection (a) for an unspecified location for the European Deterrence Initiative. The plan shall include a Department of Defense Form 1391 for each proposed project. The Secretary may not commence a project until the report has been submitted.
The Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Location | Amount |
| Germany | Germersheim | $46,000,000 |
Pursuant to section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, the following real property acquisition and military construction projects, including planning and design related to military construction projects, in the following amounts, are authorized:
| State or Location | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| North Carolina | Camp Lejeune | Various construction | $967,210,000 |
| Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point | Various Construction | $175,456,000 | |
| Unspecified Worldwide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | $68,282,000 |
(a) Air Force Authorization.—Subject to subsection (b), pursuant to section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, the following real property acquisition and military construction projects, in the following amounts, are authorized:
| State | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Florida | Tyndall Air Force Base | Various Construction | $735,752,000 |
| Nebraska | Offutt Air Force Base | Various Construction | $300,000,000 |
(b) Report required as condition of authorization.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report containing a plan to carry out the military construction projects authorized by this section. The plan shall include an explanation of how each military construction project will incorporate mitigation measures that reduce the threat from extreme weather events, mean sea level fluctuation, flooding, and any other known environmental threat to resilience, including a list of any areas in which there is a variance from the local building requirements and an explanation of the reason for the variance. The plan shall also include a Department of Defense Form 1391 for each proposed project. The Secretary may not commence a project until the report required from the Secretary has been submitted.
(a) Army National Guard Authorization.—Pursuant to section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, the following real property acquisition and military construction projects, in the following amounts, are authorized:
| State | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Florida | Panama City | National Guard Readiness Center | $25,000,000 |
| North Carolina | Military Training Area Fort Fisher | General Purpose Administrative Building | $25,000,000 |
(b) Army Reserve Authorization.—Pursuant to section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, unspecified minor construction, in the amount set forth in the following table, is authorized:
| Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Unspecified Worldwide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | $3,300,000 |
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2020 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows:
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2020 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2020 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(a) Personnel levels.—
(1) INCREASE.—Subsection (a) of section 3241A of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441a) is amended by striking “1,690” both places it appears and inserting “1,890”.
(b) Reports on service support contracts.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “as of the date of the report” and inserting “for the most recent fiscal year for which data is available”; and
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that Congress is concerned that the staffing levels of the Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation of the National Nuclear Security Administration have been persistently below the authorized level.
(b) Reporting.—Section 3221(b)(1) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2411(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Director shall report directly to the Administrator.”.
(c) Briefing.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the plan of the Administrator to fully staff the Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation of the National Nuclear Security Administration pursuant to section 3221(f) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2411(f)).
Section 4220(c) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2538b(c)) is amended—
(a) Finding and sense of Congress.—
(1) FINDING.—Congress finds that a recent study by the Institute of Defense Analyses notes, “a key milestone will be achieving the Plutonium Sustainment Program goal of 30 pits per year at Los Alamos National Laboratory”.
(2) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the National Nuclear Security Administration should prioritize achieving production of 30 pits per year at Los Alamos National Laboratory and ensure that efforts to design and construct a second site do not divert resources, including personnel and funding, from Los Alamos National Laboratory.
(b) 2027 requirement.—Section 4219 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2538a) is amended—
Section 3115(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2759), as amended by section 3137 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115–232; 132 Stat. 2303), is further amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “three-year period” and inserting “10-year period”.
Section 3125 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2766) is repealed.
Section 4716 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2756) is amended—
(a) Establishment.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish a program to assess the viability of using low-enriched uranium in naval nuclear propulsion reactors, including such reactors located on aircraft carriers and submarines, that meet the requirements of the Navy.
(b) Activities.—In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Administrator shall carry out activities to develop an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium, including activities relating to—
(c) Report.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan outlining the activities the Administrator will carry out under the program established under subsection (a), including the funding requirements associated with developing a low-enriched uranium fuel.
(a) Analysis of Alternatives.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall conduct an analysis of alternatives with respect to replacing the W78 warhead. Such analysis shall describe the technical risks and costs for each option to replace the W78 warhead.
(2) REVIEW.—The Director for Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation of the National Nuclear Security Administration shall review the analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1).
(3) REPORT.—Not later than 150 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the replacement of the W78 warhead. Such report shall include the analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1) and the review under paragraph (2).
(b) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2020 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for the modernization of the W78 warhead, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the report is submitted under subsection (a)(3).
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may establish a program known as the “Department of Energy National Lab Jobs ACCESS Program”, under which the Secretary may award, on a competitive basis, 5-year grants to eligible entities described in subsection (c) for the Federal share of the costs of technical, skills-based preapprenticeship and apprenticeship programs that provide employer-driven or recognized postsecondary credentials during the grant period.
(b) Requirements.—A program funded by a grant awarded under this section shall develop and deliver customized and competency-based training that—
(2) is focused on skills and qualifications needed, as determined by the Department of Energy in consultation with the national laboratories, to meet the immediate and on-going needs of traditional and emerging technician positions (including machinists and cyber security technicians) at the National Laboratories and covered facilities of the National Nuclear Security Administration;
(c) Eligible Entities.—An entity that is eligible to receive a grant under this section shall be a workforce intermediary or an eligible sponsor of a preapprenticeship or an apprenticeship program that—
(1) demonstrates experience in implementing and providing career planning and career pathways towards apprenticeship or preapprenticeship programs;
(2) (A) has a relationship with a National Laboratory or covered facility of the National Nuclear Security Administration;
(3) demonstrates the ability to recruit and support individuals who plan to work in relevant technician positions upon the successful completion of such programs;
(4) provides students who complete such programs with a recognized postsecondary credential, such as a journeyman craft license or an industry-recognized certification;
(d) Applications.—An eligible entity seeking a grant under this section shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.
(e) Priority.—In selecting eligible entities to receive grants under this section, the Secretary shall prioritize an eligible entity that—
(2) provides the training described in subsection (b)—
(A) at an institution of higher education (such as a community college) that includes basic science, technology, and mathematics education in the curriculum;
(3) works with the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Veteran Affairs, or veterans organizations to transition members of the Armed Forces and veterans to apprenticeship or preapprenticeship programs in a relevant sector;
(f) Additional consideration.—In making grants under this section, the Secretary shall consider regional diversity.
(g) Limitation on applications.—An eligible entity may not submit, either individually or as part of a joint application, more than 1 application for a grant under this section during any 1 fiscal year.
(h) Limitations on amount of grant.—The amount of a grant provided under this section for any 24-month period of the 5-year grant period shall not exceed $500,000.
(i) Non-Federal share.—The non-Federal share of the cost of a customized training program carried out using a grant under this section shall be not less than 25 percent of the total cost of the program.
(j) Technical assistance.—The Secretary may provide technical assistance to eligible entities described in subsection (c) to leverage the existing job training and education programs of the Department of Labor and other relevant programs at appropriate Federal agencies.
(k) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not less than once every 2 years, the Secretary of Labor shall submit to Congress, and make publicly available on the website of the Department of Labor, a report on the program established under this section, including—
(2) PROVISION OF INFORMATION.—The Secretary of Energy shall provide such information as necessary to the Secretary of Labor for purposes of the report under paragraph (1).
(3) PERFORMANCE REPORTS.—Not later than one year after the start of a new apprenticeship or preapprenticeship program established under this section, and annually thereafter, the entity carrying out the programs shall submit to the Secretary of Labor a report on the effectiveness of the program based on the accountability measures described in clauses (i) and (ii) of section 116(b)(2)(A) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3141(b)(2)(A)).
(l) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ESEA TERMS.—The terms “local educational agency” and “secondary school” have the meanings given the terms in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).
(2) WIOA TERMS.—The terms “career planning”, “community-based organization”, “customized training”, “economic development agency”, “individual with a barrier to employment”, “industry or sector partnership”, “on-the-job training”, “recognized postsecondary credential”, and “workplace learning advisor” have the meanings given such terms in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).
(3) APPRENTICESHIP.—The term “apprenticeship” means an apprenticeship registered under the Act of August 16, 1937 (commonly known as the “National Apprenticeship Act”; 50 Stat. 664, chapter 663; 29 U.S.C. 50 et seq.).
(4) AREA CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION SCHOOL.—The term “area career and technical education school” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2302).
(5) COMMUNITY COLLEGE.—The term “community college” has the meaning given the term “junior or community college” in section 312(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1058(f)).
(6) COVERED FACILITY OF THE NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.—The term “covered facility of the National Nuclear Security Administration” means a national security laboratory or a nuclear weapons production facility as such terms are defined in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501).
(7) ELIGIBLE SPONSOR.—The term “eligible sponsor” means a public organization or an organization described in section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of that Code, that—
(A) with respect to an apprenticeship program, administers such program through a partnership that may include—
(B) with respect to a preapprenticeship program, is a local educational agency, a secondary school, an area career and technical education school, a provider of adult education, a State workforce development board, a local workforce development board, or a community-based organization, that administers such program with any required coordination and necessary approvals from the Secretary of Labor or a State department of labor.
(8) INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION.—The term “institution of higher education” has the meaning given the term in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001).
(9) LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD.—The term “local workforce development board” has the meaning given the term “local board” in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).
(10) NATIONAL LABORATORY.—The term “National Laboratory” has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15801).
(11) PROVIDER OF ADULT EDUCATION.—The term “provider of adult education” has the meaning given that term in section 203 of the Adult Education and Literacy Act (29 U.S.C. 3272).
(12) RELATED INSTRUCTION.—The term “related instruction” means an organized and systematic form of instruction designed to provide an apprentice with the knowledge of the technical subjects related to the occupation of the apprentice.
(13) SECRETARY.—The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, except as otherwise specified in this Act.
(14) STATE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD.—The term “State workforce development board” has the meaning given the term “State board” in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2020, $29,450,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).
(a) Staff.—
(1) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board is not adequately staffed, particularly given the ongoing increase in defense nuclear activities during the decade following the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS.—
(A) ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION.—Subsection (b) of section 313 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286b) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) (A) The Board shall have an Executive Director of Operations who shall be appointed under section 311(c)(7).
(B) DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS.—Paragraph (3) of section 311(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2286(c)) is amended—
(ii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
(3) APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL POWERS.—Paragraph (7) of such section 311(c) is amended to read as follows:
“(7) (A) The Chairman, subject to the approval of the Board, shall appoint the senior employees described in subparagraph (C). Any member of the Board may propose to the Chairman an individual to be so appointed.
(4) FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT PERSONNEL LEVELS.—Section 313(b)(1)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2286b(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking “but not ” and all that follows through the semicolon and inserting “but not fewer than the equivalent of 110 full-time employees and not more than the equivalent of 130 full-time employees;”.
(b) Public health and safety.—Section 312(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2286a(a)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, including with respect to the health and safety of employees and contractors at such facilities”.
(c) Access to facilities, personnel, and information.—Section 314 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2286c) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by striking “The Secretary of Energy” and inserting “Except as specifically provided by this section, the Secretary of Energy”;
(2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsections:
(a) Amount.—There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $14,000,000 for fiscal year 2020 for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 869 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves.
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Transportation for fiscal year 2020, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in appropriations Acts, for programs associated with maintaining the United States merchant marine, the following amounts:
(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, $81,944,000, of which—
(2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime academies, $38,480,000, of which—
(3) For expenses necessary to support the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel Program, $300,000,000, which shall remain available until expended.
(5) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $5,000,000, which shall remain available until expended.
(6) For expenses necessary to maintain and preserve a United States flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, $300,000,000.
(7) For expenses necessary for the loan guarantee program authorized under chapter 537 of title 46, United States Code, $33,000,000, of which—
(A) $30,000,000 may be used for the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5))) of loan guarantees under the program; and
(a) Award of operating agreements.—Section 53103 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking “2025” each place it appears and inserting “2035”.
(b) Effectiveness of operating agreements.—Section 53104(a) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by striking “2025” and inserting “2035”.
(c) Payments.—Section 53106(a)(1) of title 46, United States Code, is amended—
Section 7 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 656) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(d) There is established a Maritime Occupational Safety and Health Advisory Committee, which shall be a continuing body and shall provide advice to the Secretary in formulating maritime industry standards and regarding matters pertaining to the administration of this Act related to the maritime industry. The composition of such advisory committee shall be consistent with the advisory committees established under subsection (b). A member of the advisory committee who is otherwise qualified may continue to serve until a successor is appointed. The Secretary may promulgate or amend regulations as necessary to implement this subsection.”.
(a) In general.—Subtitle VII of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“70701. Definitions.
“70702. Establishment of the Tanker Security Fleet.
“70703. Vessel standards.
“70704. Award of operating agreements.
“70705. Effectiveness of operating agreements.
“70706. Obligations and rights under operating agreements.
“70707. Payments.
“70708. National security requirements.
“70709. Regulatory relief.
“70710. Special rule regarding age of participating Fleet vessels.
“70711. Regulations.
“70712. Authorization of appropriations.
“70713. Acquisition of Fleet vessels.
“In this chapter:
“(1) FOREIGN COMMERCE.—The term ‘foreign commerce’ means—
“(A) commerce or trade between the United States, its territories or possessions, or the District of Columbia, and a foreign country; and
“(B) commerce or trade between foreign countries including trade between foreign ports in accordance with normal commercial bulk shipping practices in such a manner as will permit vessels of the United States freely to compete with foreign-flag liquid bulk carrying vessels in their operation or in competing charters, subject to rules and regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Transportation pursuant to this chapter or subtitle.
“(2) PARTICIPATING FLEET VESSEL.—The term ‘participating Fleet vessel’ means any tank vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter on or after January 1, 2021.
“(3) PERSON.—The term ‘person’ includes corporations, partnerships, and associations existing under, or authorized by, laws of the United States, or any State, territory, district, or possession thereof, or any foreign country.
“(4) TANK VESSEL.—The term ‘tank vessel’ has the meaning that term has under section 2101 of this title.
“(5) UNITED STATES CITIZEN TRUST.—The term ‘United States citizen trust’—
“(A) means a trust for which—
“(ii) the application for documentation of the vessel under chapter 121 of this title includes an affidavit of each trustee stating that the trustee is not aware of any reason involving a beneficiary of the trust that is not a citizen of the United States, or involving any other person who is not a citizen of the United States, as a result of which the beneficiary or other person would hold more than 25 percent of the aggregate power to influence or limit the exercise of the authority of the trustee with respect to matters involving any ownership or operation of the vessel that may adversely affect the interests of the United States;
“(B) does not include a trust for which any person that is not a citizen of the United States has authority to direct, or participate in directing, a trustee for a trust in matters involving any ownership or operation of the vessel that may adversely affect the interests of the United States or in removing a trustee without cause, either directly or indirectly through the control of another person, unless the trust instrument provides that persons who are not citizens of the United States may not hold more than 25 percent of the aggregate authority to so direct or remove a trustee; and
“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall establish a fleet of active, commercially viable, militarily useful, privately owned product tankers to meet national defense and other security requirements and maintain a United States presence in international commercial shipping. The fleet shall consist of privately owned vessels of the United States for which there are in effect operating agreements under this chapter, and shall be known as the ‘Tanker Security Fleet’ (hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the ‘Fleet’).
“(b) Vessel Eligibility.—A vessel is eligible to be included in the Fleet if the vessel—
“(2) is operated (or in the case of a vessel to be constructed, will be operated) in providing transportation in United States foreign commerce;
“(4) is not more than ten years of age on the date the vessel is first included in the Fleet and not more than 25 years of age at any time during which the vessel is included in the Fleet;
“(5) is determined by the Secretary of Defense to be suitable for use by the United States for national defense or military purposes in time of war or national emergency; and
“(c) Requirements regarding citizenship of owners, charterers, and operators.—
“(1) VESSELS OWNED AND OPERATED BY SECTION 50501 CITIZENS.—A vessel meets the requirements of this paragraph if, during the period of an operating agreement under this chapter that applies to the vessel, the vessel will be owned and operated by one or more persons that are citizens of the United States under section 50501 of this title.
“(2) VESSELS OWNED BY A SECTION 50501 CITIZEN, OR UNITED STATES CITIZEN TRUST, AND CHARTERED TO A DOCUMENTATION CITIZEN.—A vessel meets the requirements of this paragraph if—
“(A) during the period of an operating agreement under this chapter that applies to the vessel, the vessel will be—
“(i) owned by a person that is a citizen of the United States under section 50501 of this title or that is a United States citizen trust; and
“(ii) demise chartered to a person—
“(B) in the case of a vessel that will be demise chartered to a person that is owned or controlled by another person that is not a citizen of the United States under section 50501 of this title, the other person enters into an agreement with the Secretary not to influence the operation of the vessel in a manner that will adversely affect the interests of the United States; and
“(C) the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense notify the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives that the Secretaries concur with the certification required under subparagraph (A)(ii)(III), and have reviewed and agree that there are no legal, operational, or other impediments that would prohibit the owner or operator for the vessel from performing its obligations under an operating agreement under this chapter.
“(3) VESSELS OWNED AND OPERATED BY A DEFENSE OWNER OR OPERATOR.—A vessel meets the requirements of this paragraph if—
“(A) during the period of an operating agreement under this chapter that applies to the vessel, the vessel will be owned and operated by a person that—
“(ii) operates or manages other vessels of the United States for the Secretary of Defense, or charters other vessels to the Secretary of Defense;
“(B) the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense notify the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives that they concur with the certification required under subparagraph (A)(iv), and have reviewed and agree that there are no legal, operational, or other impediments that would prohibit the owner or operator for the vessel from performing its obligations under an operating agreement under this chapter.
“(d) Request by secretary of defense.—The Secretary of Defense shall request that the Commandant of the Coast Guard issue any waiver under section 501 of this title that the Secretary of Defense determines is necessary for purposes of this chapter.
“(e) Vessel standards.—
“(1) CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION.—A vessel used to provide oceangoing transportation that the Commandant of the Coast Guard determines meets the criteria of subsection (b) but which, on the date of enactment of this section, is not documented under chapter 121 of this title, shall be eligible for a certificate of inspection if the Commandant of the Coast Guard determines that—
“(A) the vessel is classed by and designed in accordance with the rules of the American Bureau of Shipping, or another classification society accepted by the Commandant of the Coast Guard;
“(2) RELIANCE ON CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commandant of the Coast Guard may rely on a certification from the American Bureau of Shipping or, subject to subparagraph (B), another classification society accepted by the Commandant of the Coast Guard, to establish that a vessel is in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (1).
“(B) FOREIGN CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY.—The Secretary may accept certification from a foreign classification society under subparagraph (A) only—
“(a) Certificate of inspection.—A vessel used to provide transportation service as a common carrier that the Secretary of Transportation determines meets the criteria of section 53102(b) of this title, which on the date of enactment of this section is not a documented vessel (as that term is defined in section 106 of this title), shall be eligible for a certificate of inspection if the Secretary determines that—
“(1) the vessel is classed by and designed in accordance with the rules of the American Bureau of Shipping or another classification society accepted by the Secretary;
“(b) Continued Eligibility for Certificate.—Subsection (a) does not apply to any vessel that has failed to comply with the applicable international agreements and association guidelines referred to in subsection (a)(2).
“(c) Reliance on Classification Society.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may rely on a certification from the American Bureau of Shipping or, subject to paragraph (2), another classification society accepted by the Secretary, to establish that a vessel is in compliance with the requirements of subsections (a) and (b).
“(2) FOREIGN CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY.—The Secretary may accept certification from a foreign classification society under paragraph (1) only—
“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Transportation shall require, as a condition of including any vessel in the Fleet, that the owner or operator of the vessel enter into an operating agreement with the Secretary under this section.
“(b) Procedure for applications.—
“(1) PARTICIPATING FLEET VESSELS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation shall accept an application for an operating agreement for a participating Fleet vessel under the priority under paragraph (2) only from a person that has authority to enter into an operating agreement under this chapter.
“(B) VESSEL UNDER DEMISE CHARTER.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), in the case of a vessel that is subject to a demise charter that terminates by its own terms on September 30, 2035 (without giving effect to any extension provided therein for completion of a voyage or to effect the actual redelivery of the vessel), or that is terminable at the will of the owner of the vessel after such date, only the owner of the vessel shall be treated as having the authority referred to in subparagraph (A).
“(2) DISCRETION WITHIN PRIORITY.—The Secretary of Transportation—
“(A) may award operating agreements under paragraph (1) according to such priorities as the Secretary considers appropriate; and
“(a) In general.—Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, the Secretary of Transportation may enter into an operating agreement under this chapter for fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year. Each such agreement may be renewed annually for up to seven years.
“(b) Vessels under charter to the United States.—The owner or operator of a vessel under charter to the United States is eligible to receive payments pursuant to any operating agreement that covers such vessel.
“(c) Termination.—
“(1) TERMINATION BY SECRETARY FOR LACK OF OWNER OR OPERATOR COMPLIANCE.—If the owner or operator with respect to an operating agreement materially fails to comply with the terms of the agreement—
“(2) TERMINATION BY OWNER OR OPERATOR.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—If an owner or operator provides notice of the intent to terminate an operating agreement under this chapter on a date specified by not later than 60 days prior to such date, such agreement shall terminate on the date specified by the owner or operator.
“(B) REPLACEMENT.—An operating agreement with respect to a vessel shall terminate on the date that is three years after the date on which the vessel begins operating under the agreement, if—
“(i) the owner or operator notifies the Secretary, by not later than two years after the date the vessel begins operating under the agreement, that the owner or operator intends to terminate the agreement under this subparagraph; and
“(ii) the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, determines that—
“(I) an application for an operating agreement under this chapter has been received for a replacement vessel that is acceptable to the Secretaries; and
“(d) Nonrenewal for lack of funds.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—If sufficient funds are not made available to carry out an operating agreement under this chapter—
“(A) the Secretary of Transportation shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives notice that such agreement shall be not renewed effective on the 60th day of the fiscal year, unless such funds are made available before such day; and
“(2) RELEASE OF VESSELS FROM OBLIGATIONS.—If an operating agreement for a vessel under this chapter is not renewed pursuant to paragraph (1), then the owner or operator of the vessel is released from any further obligation under the operating agreement as of the date of such termination or nonrenewal.
“(3) FOREIGN TRANSFER AND REGISTRATION.—The owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter may transfer and register such vessel under a foreign registry that is acceptable to the Secretary and the Secretary of Defense, notwithstanding section 70701 of this title.
“(a) Operation of Vessel.—An operating agreement under this chapter shall require that, during the period the vessel covered by the agreement is operating under the agreement the vessel shall—
“(b) Operating agreement is an obligation of the United States Government.—An operating agreement under this chapter constitutes a contractual obligation of the United States Government to pay the amounts provided for in the agreement to the extent of actual appropriations.
“(c) Obligations of owner or operator.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter shall agree, as a condition of such agreement, to remain obligated to carry out the requirements described in paragraph (2) until the termination date specified in the agreement, even in the case of early termination of the agreement under section 70705(c) of this title. This subsection shall not apply in the case of an operating agreement terminated for lack of funds under section 70705(d) of this title.
“(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The requirements described in this paragraph are the following:
“(C) That all terms and conditions of an emergency preparedness agreement entered into under section 70708 of this title shall remain in effect, except that the terms of such emergency preparedness agreement may be modified by the mutual consent of the owner or operator, the Secretary and the Secretary of Defense as provided in such section.
“(d) Transfer of operating agreements.—The owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter may transfer that agreement (including all rights and obligations under the agreement) to any person that is eligible to enter into that operating agreement under this chapter, if the transfer is approved by the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense.
“(e) Replacement of vessels covered by agreements.—A owner or operator may replace a vessel covered by an operating agreement with another vessel that is eligible to be included in the Fleet under section 70702(b), if the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, approves the replacement of the vessel. In selecting a replacement vessel, the owner or operator shall give primary consideration to—
“(a) Annual payment.—Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose and the other provisions of this chapter, the Secretary shall pay to the owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter an amount equal to $6,000,000 for each vessel covered by the agreement for each fiscal year that the vessel is covered by the agreement. Such amount shall be paid in equal monthly installments on the last day of each month. The amount payable under this subsection may not be reduced except as provided by this section.
“(b) Certification required for payment.—As a condition of receiving payment under this section for a fiscal year for a vessel, the owner or operator for the vessel shall certify, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary, that the vessel has been and will be operated in accordance with section 70706 of this title for at least 320 days during the fiscal year. Days during which the vessel is drydocked, surveyed, inspected, or repaired shall be considered days of operation for purposes of this subsection.
“(c) General limitations.—The Secretary may not make any payment under this chapter for a vessel with respect to any days for which the vessel is—
“(d) Reductions in payments.—With respect to payments under this chapter for a vessel covered by an operating agreement, the Secretary—
“(1) except as provided in paragraph (2), may not reduce such a payment for the operation of the vessel to carry military or other preference cargoes under section 55302(a), 55304, 55305, or 55314 of this title, section 2631 of title 10, or any other cargo preference law of the United States;
“(2) may not make such a payment for any day that the vessel is engaged in transporting more than 7,500 tons of civilian bulk preference cargoes pursuant to section 55302(a), 55305, or 55314 of this title, section 90l(a) or (b) of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 App. U.S.C. 124l(a), 1241(b), or 1241(f)), that is bulk cargo; and
“(e) Limitations regarding noncontiguous domestic trade.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—No owner or operator shall receive payments pursuant to this chapter during a period in which it participates in noncontiguous domestic trade.
“(2) LIMITATION ON APPLICATION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a owner or operator that is a citizen of the United States within the meaning of section 50501 of this title, applying the 75 percent ownership requirement of that section.
“(3) PARTICIPATES IN A NONCONTIGUOUS TRADE DEFINED.—In this subsection the term ‘participates in a noncontiguous domestic trade’ means directly or indirectly owns, charters, or operates a vessel engaged in transportation of cargo between a point in the contiguous 48 States and a point in Alaska, Hawaii, or Puerto Rico, other than a point in Alaska north of the Arctic Circle.
“(a) Emergency preparedness agreement required.—The Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall establish an emergency preparedness program under this section under which the owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement under this chapter shall agree, as a condition of the operating agreement, to enter into an emergency preparedness agreement with the Secretaries. Each such emergency preparedness agreement shall be entered into as promptly as practicable after the owner or operator has entered into the operating agreement.
“(b) Terms of agreement.—The terms of an agreement under this section—
“(1) shall provide that upon request by the Secretary of Defense during time of war or national emergency, or whenever determined by the Secretary of Defense to be necessary for national security or contingency operation (as that term is defined in section 101 of title 10), the owner or operator shall make available commercial transportation resources (including services) described in subsection (d) to the Secretary of Defense;
“(c) Participation after expiration of operating agreement.—Except as provided by section 70706 of this title, the Secretary may not require, through an emergency preparedness agreement or an operating agreement, that an owner or operator of a vessel covered by an operating agreement continue to participate in an emergency preparedness agreement after the operating agreement has expired according to its terms or is otherwise no longer in effect. After the expiration of an emergency preparedness agreement, a owner or operator may voluntarily continue to participate in the agreement.
“(d) Resources made available.—The commercial transportation resources to be made available under an emergency preparedness agreement shall include vessels or capacity in vessels, terminal facilities, management services, and other related services, or any agreed portion of such nonvessel resources for activation as the Secretary of Defense may determine to be necessary, seeking to minimize disruption of the owner or operator’s service to commercial customers.
“(e) Compensation.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Each emergency preparedness agreement under this section shall provide that the Secretary of Defense shall pay fair and reasonable compensation for all commercial transportation resources provided pursuant to this section.
“(2) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.—Compensation under this subsection—
“(A) shall not be less than the owner or operator’s commercial market charges for like transportation resources;
“(f) Temporary replacement vessels.—Notwithstanding section 55302(a), 55304, 55305, or 55314 of this title, section 2631 of title 10, or any other cargo preference law of the United States—
“(1) an owner or operator may operate or employ in foreign commerce a foreign-flag vessel or foreign-flag vessel capacity as a temporary replacement for a vessel of the United States or vessel of the United States capacity that is activated by the Secretary of Defense under an emergency preparedness agreement or a primary Department of Defense sealift readiness program; and
“(2) such replacement vessel or vessel capacity shall be eligible during the replacement period to transport preference cargoes subject to sections 55302(a), 55304, 55305, and 55314 of this title and section 2631 of title 10 to the same extent as the eligibility of the vessel or vessel capacity replaced.
“(g) Redelivery and Liability of the United States for Damages.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—All commercial transportation resources activated under an emergency preparedness agreement shall, upon termination of the period of activation, be redelivered to the owner or operator in the same good order and condition as when received, less ordinary wear and tear, or the Secretary of Defense shall fully compensate the owner or operator for any necessary repair or replacement.
“(2) LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES LIABILITY.—Except as may be expressly agreed in an emergency preparedness agreement, or as otherwise provided by law, the Government shall not be liable for disruption of an owner or operator’s commercial business or other consequential damages to an owner or operator arising from the activation of commercial transportation resources under an emergency preparedness agreement.
“(a) Operation in foreign commerce.—An owner or operator for a vessel included in an operating agreement under this chapter may operate the vessel in the foreign commerce of the United States without restriction.
“(b) Other restrictions.—The restrictions of section 55305(a) of this title concerning the building, rebuilding, or documentation of a vessel in a foreign country shall not apply to a vessel for any day the operator of the vessel is receiving payments for the operation of that vessel under an operating agreement under this chapter.
“(c) Telecommunications equipment.—The telecommunications and other electronic equipment on an existing vessel that is redocumented under the laws of the United States for operation under an operating agreement under this chapter shall be deemed to satisfy all Federal Communications Commission equipment certification requirements, if—
“(1) such equipment complies with all applicable international agreements and associated guidelines as determined by the country in which the vessel was documented immediately before becoming documented under the laws of the United States;
“Any age restriction under section 70702(b)(4) of this title shall not apply to a participating Fleet vessel during the 30-month period beginning on the date the vessel begins operating under an operating agreement under this chapter, if the Secretary of Transportation determines that the owner or operator of the vessel has entered into an arrangement to obtain and operate under the operating agreement for the participating Fleet vessel a replacement vessel that, upon commencement of such operation, will be eligible to be included in the Fleet under section 70702(b) of this title.
“The Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense may each prescribe rules as necessary to carry out their respective responsibilities under this chapter.
“There is authorized to be appropriated for payments under section 70707, $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2035, to remain available until expended.
“(a) In general.—Upon replacement of a Fleet Vessel under an operating agreement under this chapter, and subject to agreement by the owner or operator of the vessel, the Secretary of Transportation is authorized, subject to the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, to acquire the vessel being replaced for inclusion in the National Defense Reserve Fleet.
“(b) Requirements.—To be eligible for acquisition by the Secretary of Transportation under this section a vessel shall—
“(c) Fair market value.—A fair market value shall be established by the Maritime Administration for acquisition of an eligible vessel under this section.
“(d) Appropriations.—Vessel acquisitions under this section shall be subject to the availability of appropriations. Amounts made available to carry out this section shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the National Defense Reserve Fleet. Amounts authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Maritime Security Program may not be use to carry out this section.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of chapters for subtitle VII of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
- “707. Tanker Security Fleet 70701”.
(c) Deadline for accepting applications.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation shall begin accepting applications for enrollment of vessels in the Tanker Security Fleet established under chapter 707 of title 46, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), by not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) In general.—Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
(b) Merit-based decisions.—A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
(c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1512 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts.
| SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| FIXED WING | |||||||
| 002 | UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT | 16,000 | 0 | ||||
| Early to need | [–16,000] | ||||||
| 004 | RQ–11 (RAVEN) | 23,510 | 21,510 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–2,000] | ||||||
| ROTARY | |||||||
| 005 | TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (TUAS) | 12,100 | 12,100 | ||||
| 007 | HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) | 11,000 | |||||
| Program increase for sustainment improvements | [11,000] | ||||||
| 008 | AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN | 806,849 | 786,009 | ||||
| Unjustified cost growth | [–20,840] | ||||||
| 009 | AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN | 190,870 | 174,970 | ||||
| Unjustified cost growth | [–15,900] | ||||||
| 012 | UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) | 1,411,540 | 1,411,540 | ||||
| 013 | UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) | 79,572 | 79,572 | ||||
| 014 | UH–60 BLACK HAWK L AND V MODELS | 169,290 | 169,290 | ||||
| 015 | CH–47 HELICOPTER | 140,290 | 131,290 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–9,000] | ||||||
| 016 | CH–47 HELICOPTER | 18,186 | 46,186 | ||||
| Advanced procurement for CH–47F Block II | [28,000] | ||||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 019 | UNIVERSAL GROUND CONTROL EQUIPMENT (UAS) | 2,090 | 2,090 | ||||
| 020 | GRAY EAGLE MODS2 | 14,699 | 14,699 | ||||
| 021 | MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) | 35,189 | 35,189 | ||||
| 022 | AH–64 MODS | 58,172 | 58,172 | ||||
| 023 | CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) | 11,785 | 6,785 | ||||
| Unobligated balances | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 024 | GRCS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 5,677 | 5,677 | ||||
| 025 | ARL SEMA MODS (MIP) | 6,566 | 6,566 | ||||
| 026 | EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 3,859 | 3,859 | ||||
| 027 | UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS | 15,476 | 13,476 | ||||
| Unit cost discrepancy | [–2,000] | ||||||
| 028 | UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS | 6,744 | 6,744 | ||||
| 029 | NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN | 105,442 | 98,442 | ||||
| Cost growth | [–7,000] | ||||||
| 030 | COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE | 164,315 | 164,315 | ||||
| 032 | GATM ROLLUP | 30,966 | 30,966 | ||||
| 033 | RQ–7 UAV MODS | 8,983 | 38,983 | ||||
| Program increase | [30,000] | ||||||
| 034 | UAS MODS | 10,205 | 10,205 | ||||
| GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS | |||||||
| 035 | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT | 52,297 | 52,297 | ||||
| 036 | SURVIVABILITY CM | 8,388 | 8,388 | ||||
| 037 | CMWS | 13,999 | 13,999 | ||||
| 038 | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 168,784 | 168,784 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 039 | AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,777 | 1,777 | ||||
| 040 | COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT | 18,624 | 18,624 | ||||
| 041 | AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS | 48,255 | 48,255 | ||||
| 042 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 32,738 | 32,738 | ||||
| 044 | LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET | 2,201 | 2,201 | ||||
| 045 | LAUNCHER GUIDED MISSILE: LONGBOW HELLFIRE XM2 | 991 | 991 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 3,696,429 | 3,687,689 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 001 | SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND TEST PROCUREMENT | 113,857 | 113,857 | ||||
| 002 | M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT | 103,800 | 56,800 | ||||
| Early to need | [–47,000] | ||||||
| 003 | MSE MISSILE | 698,603 | 698,603 | ||||
| 004 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2–I | 9,337 | 9,337 | ||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 006 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 193,284 | 173,284 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 007 | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS (JAGM) | 233,353 | 198,353 | ||||
| Contract and schedule delays | [–35,000] | ||||||
| ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS | |||||||
| 008 | JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY | 138,405 | 138,405 | ||||
| 009 | TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY | 114,340 | 110,340 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–4,000] | ||||||
| 010 | TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY | 10,500 | 10,500 | ||||
| 011 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 797,213 | 767,213 | ||||
| Program adjustment | [–30,000] | ||||||
| 012 | MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) | 27,555 | 27,555 | ||||
| 014 | ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM | 209,842 | 184,842 | ||||
| Excess to need | [–25,000] | ||||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 016 | PATRIOT MODS | 279,464 | 279,464 | ||||
| 017 | ATACMS MODS | 85,320 | 80,320 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 018 | GMLRS MOD | 5,094 | 5,094 | ||||
| 019 | STINGER MODS | 81,615 | 81,615 | ||||
| 020 | AVENGER MODS | 14,107 | 14,107 | ||||
| 021 | ITAS/TOW MODS | 3,469 | 3,469 | ||||
| 022 | MLRS MODS | 39,019 | 39,019 | ||||
| 023 | HIMARS MODIFICATIONS | 12,483 | 12,483 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 024 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 26,444 | 26,444 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 025 | AIR DEFENSE TARGETS | 10,593 | 10,593 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 3,207,697 | 3,041,697 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) | 264,040 | 259,040 | ||||
| Unit cost discrepancy | [–5,000] | ||||||
| MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 003 | STRYKER (MOD) | 144,387 | 393,587 | ||||
| Accelerate Stryker medium caliber weapon system—Army unfunded priority | [249,200] | ||||||
| 004 | STRYKER UPGRADE | 550,000 | 550,000 | ||||
| 005 | BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) | 638,781 | 573,781 | ||||
| Program delay | [–65,000] | ||||||
| 006 | M109 FOV MODIFICATIONS | 25,756 | 25,756 | ||||
| 007 | PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) | 553,425 | 553,425 | ||||
| 009 | ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) | 2,821 | 2,821 | ||||
| 010 | ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE | 31,697 | 31,697 | ||||
| 011 | M88 FOV MODS | 4,500 | 4,500 | ||||
| 012 | JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE | 205,517 | 205,517 | ||||
| 013 | M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) | 348,800 | 408,800 | ||||
| Vehicle protection system for one armored brigade | [60,000] | ||||||
| 014 | ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM | 1,752,784 | 1,752,784 | ||||
| WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 016 | MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON S | 19,420 | 19,420 | ||||
| 017 | GUN AUTOMATIC 30MM M230 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| 019 | MORTAR SYSTEMS | 14,907 | 14,907 | ||||
| 020 | XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) | 191 | 191 | ||||
| 021 | PRECISION SNIPER RIFLE | 7,977 | 7,977 | ||||
| 022 | COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM | 9,860 | 9,860 | ||||
| 023 | CARBINE | 30,331 | 30,331 | ||||
| 024 | SMALL ARMS—FIRE CONTROL | 8,060 | 60 | ||||
| Late contract award | [–8,000] | ||||||
| 025 | COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION | 24,007 | 24,007 | ||||
| 026 | HANDGUN | 6,174 | 6,174 | ||||
| MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH | |||||||
| 028 | MK–19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS | 3,737 | 3,737 | ||||
| 029 | M777 MODS | 2,367 | 2,367 | ||||
| 030 | M4 CARBINE MODS | 17,595 | 17,595 | ||||
| 033 | M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS | 8,000 | 8,000 | ||||
| 034 | SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS | 2,426 | 2,426 | ||||
| 035 | M119 MODIFICATIONS | 6,269 | 6,269 | ||||
| 036 | MORTAR MODIFICATION | 1,693 | 1,693 | ||||
| 037 | MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) | 4,327 | 4,327 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 038 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) | 3,066 | 3,066 | ||||
| 039 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) | 2,651 | 2,651 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | 4,715,566 | 4,946,766 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES | 68,949 | 63,949 | ||||
| Prior-year carryover | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 002 | CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES | 114,228 | 111,228 | ||||
| Prior-year carryover | [–3,000] | ||||||
| 003 | CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES | 17,807 | 12,807 | ||||
| Program adjustment | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 004 | CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES | 63,966 | 63,966 | ||||
| 005 | CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES | 35,920 | 27,920 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–8,000] | ||||||
| 006 | CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES | 8,990 | 8,990 | ||||
| 007 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 68,813 | 57,229 | ||||
| Prior-year carry over | [–1,134] | ||||||
| Program adjustment | [–10,450] | ||||||
| 008 | CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES | 103,952 | 103,952 | ||||
| MORTAR AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 009 | 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 50,580 | 49,580 | ||||
| Unit cost discrepancy | [–1,000] | ||||||
| 010 | 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 59,373 | 44,673 | ||||
| Contract delays | [–14,700] | ||||||
| 011 | 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 125,452 | 123,452 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–2,000] | ||||||
| TANK AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 012 | CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES | 171,284 | 113,084 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–58,200] | ||||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 013 | ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES | 44,675 | 44,675 | ||||
| 014 | ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES | 266,037 | 266,037 | ||||
| 015 | PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 | 57,434 | 57,434 | ||||
| 016 | ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL | 271,602 | 265,602 | ||||
| Cost growth and unjustified product improvements | [–6,000] | ||||||
| MINES | |||||||
| 017 | MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES | 55,433 | 39,433 | ||||
| Contract delay | [–16,000] | ||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 018 | SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 74,878 | 74,878 | ||||
| 019 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 175,994 | 165,994 | ||||
| Excess support costs | [–10,000] | ||||||
| OTHER AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 020 | CAD/PAD, ALL TYPES | 7,595 | 7,595 | ||||
| 021 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 51,651 | 51,651 | ||||
| 022 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 40,592 | 40,592 | ||||
| 023 | SIGNALS, ALL TYPES | 18,609 | 18,609 | ||||
| 024 | SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES | 16,054 | 16,054 | ||||
| MISCELLANEOUS | |||||||
| 025 | AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES | 5,261 | 5,261 | ||||
| 026 | NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES | 715 | 715 | ||||
| 027 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) | 9,213 | 9,213 | ||||
| 028 | AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT | 10,044 | 10,044 | ||||
| 029 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) | 18,492 | 18,492 | ||||
| 030 | CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES | 99 | 99 | ||||
| PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 031 | INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 474,511 | 474,511 | ||||
| 032 | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION | 202,512 | 202,512 | ||||
| 033 | ARMS INITIATIVE | 3,833 | 3,833 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 2,694,548 | 2,554,064 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS | 12,993 | 12,993 | ||||
| 002 | SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: | 102,386 | 102,386 | ||||
| 003 | AMBULANCE, 4 LITTER, 5/4 TON, 4X4 | 127,271 | 127,271 | ||||
| 004 | GROUND MOBILITY VEHICLES (GMV) | 37,038 | 35,038 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–2,000] | ||||||
| 006 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 996,007 | 976,507 | ||||
| Army requested transfer to RDTE, A line 169 | [–4,500] | ||||||
| Simulator delay | [–15,000] | ||||||
| 007 | TRUCK, DUMP, 20T (CCE) | 10,838 | 10,838 | ||||
| 008 | FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) | 72,057 | 138,057 | ||||
| Program increase | [66,000] | ||||||
| 009 | FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP | 28,048 | 28,048 | ||||
| 010 | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) | 9,969 | 9,969 | ||||
| 011 | PLS ESP | 6,280 | 6,280 | ||||
| 012 | HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV | 30,841 | 131,841 | ||||
| Program increase | [101,000] | ||||||
| 013 | HMMWV RECAPITALIZATION PROGRAM | 5,734 | 5,734 | ||||
| 014 | TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS | 45,113 | 45,113 | ||||
| 015 | MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP | 58,946 | 58,946 | ||||
| NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 017 | HEAVY ARMORED VEHICLE | 791 | 791 | ||||
| 018 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 1,416 | 1,416 | ||||
| 019 | NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER | 29,891 | 29,891 | ||||
| COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 021 | SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 153,933 | 148,933 | ||||
| Excess funding for spares | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 022 | TACTICAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY MOD IN SVC | 387,439 | 411,439 | ||||
| ITN-M for one armored brigade combat team | [24,000] | ||||||
| 023 | SITUATION INFORMATION TRANSPORT | 46,693 | 46,693 | ||||
| 025 | JCSE EQUIPMENT (USRDECOM) | 5,075 | 5,075 | ||||
| COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 028 | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS | 101,189 | 101,189 | ||||
| 029 | TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS | 77,141 | 77,141 | ||||
| 030 | SHF TERM | 16,054 | 16,054 | ||||
| 031 | ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING | 41,074 | 24,914 | ||||
| Contract delays | [–28,760] | ||||||
| Program cancellation | [–7,400] | ||||||
| Program increase | [20,000] | ||||||
| 032 | SMART-T (SPACE) | 10,515 | 10,515 | ||||
| 033 | GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS | 11,800 | 11,800 | ||||
| 034 | ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC) | 8,609 | 8,609 | ||||
| COMM—C3 SYSTEM | |||||||
| 038 | COE TACTICAL SERVER INFRASTRUCTURE (TSI) | 77,533 | 77,533 | ||||
| COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 039 | HANDHELD MANPACK SMALL FORM FIT (HMS) | 468,026 | 468,026 | ||||
| Program delay | [–25,000] | ||||||
| SFAB technology refresh | [25,000] | ||||||
| 040 | RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) | 23,778 | 23,778 | ||||
| 044 | SPIDER FAMILY OF NETWORKED MUNITIONS INCR | 10,930 | 10,930 | ||||
| 046 | UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE | 9,291 | 8,291 | ||||
| Excess program management costs | [–1,000] | ||||||
| 047 | COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT | 55,630 | 55,630 | ||||
| 048 | FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE | 16,590 | 16,590 | ||||
| 049 | ARMY COMMUNICATIONS & ELECTRONICS | 43,457 | 43,457 | ||||
| COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM | |||||||
| 051 | CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) | 10,470 | 10,470 | ||||
| 052 | DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE | 3,704 | 3,704 | ||||
| INFORMATION SECURITY | |||||||
| 053 | FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||
| 054 | INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP | 3,600 | 3,600 | ||||
| 055 | COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) | 160,899 | 141,899 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–19,000] | ||||||
| 056 | DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS | 61,962 | 61,962 | ||||
| 057 | INSIDER THREAT PROGRAM—UNIT ACTIVITY MONITO | 756 | 756 | ||||
| 058 | PERSISTENT CYBER TRAINING ENVIRONMENT | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||
| COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 059 | BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS | 31,770 | 26,770 | ||||
| Insufficient budget justification | [–5,000] | ||||||
| COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 060 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 159,009 | 139,009 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–15,000] | ||||||
| Unjustified growth in SRM HW | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 061 | EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 4,854 | 4,854 | ||||
| 062 | HOME STATION MISSION COMMAND CENTERS (HSMCC) | 47,174 | 47,174 | ||||
| 063 | INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM | 297,994 | 247,994 | ||||
| Insufficient budget justification | [–50,000] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) | |||||||
| 066 | JTT/CIBS-M (MIP) | 7,686 | 7,686 | ||||
| 068 | DCGS-A (MIP) | 180,350 | 180,350 | ||||
| 070 | TROJAN (MIP) | 17,368 | 17,368 | ||||
| 071 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) | 59,052 | 59,052 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) | |||||||
| 077 | LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR | 5,400 | 5,400 | ||||
| 078 | EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) | 7,568 | 7,568 | ||||
| 079 | AIR VIGILANCE (AV) (MIP) | 8,953 | 8,953 | ||||
| 081 | MULTI-FUNCTION ELECTRONIC WARFARE (MFEW) SYST | 6,420 | 6,420 | ||||
| 083 | COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES | 501 | 501 | ||||
| 084 | CI MODERNIZATION (MIP) | 121 | 121 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) | |||||||
| 085 | SENTINEL MODS | 115,210 | 114,210 | ||||
| Excess support costs | [–1,000] | ||||||
| 086 | NIGHT VISION DEVICES | 236,604 | 160,604 | ||||
| Insufficient justification (IVAS) | [–76,000] | ||||||
| 088 | SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF | 22,623 | 22,623 | ||||
| 090 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS | 29,127 | 29,127 | ||||
| 091 | FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS) | 120,883 | 81,541 | ||||
| Excess unit cost growth | [–39,342] | ||||||
| 094 | JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) | 265,667 | 240,167 | ||||
| Program adjustment | [–25,500] | ||||||
| 095 | JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS) | 69,720 | 44,720 | ||||
| Program delay | [–25,000] | ||||||
| 096 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) | 6,044 | 6,044 | ||||
| 097 | COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 | 3,268 | 3,268 | ||||
| 098 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM | 13,199 | 13,199 | ||||
| 099 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS MODIFICATIONS | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||
| 100 | COUNTERFIRE RADARS | 16,416 | 16,416 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 102 | FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY | 13,197 | 13,197 | ||||
| 103 | AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS | 24,730 | 24,730 | ||||
| 104 | IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM | 29,629 | 29,629 | ||||
| 105 | LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) | 6,774 | 6,774 | ||||
| 106 | NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE | 24,448 | 24,448 | ||||
| 107 | MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) | 260 | 260 | ||||
| 108 | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) | 17,962 | 17,962 | ||||
| 109 | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP | 18,674 | 18,674 | ||||
| 110 | RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET | 11,000 | 11,000 | ||||
| 111 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (ENFIRE) | 7,317 | 15,317 | ||||
| Program increase—land surveying systems | [8,000] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION | |||||||
| 112 | ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION | 14,578 | 14,578 | ||||
| 113 | AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP | 139,342 | 129,342 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||||||
| Unjustified growth | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 114 | GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM | 15,802 | 15,802 | ||||
| 115 | HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) | 67,610 | 67,610 | ||||
| 116 | CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||||
| 117 | CSS COMMUNICATIONS | 24,700 | 24,700 | ||||
| 118 | RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) | 27,879 | 27,879 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) | |||||||
| 120 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT | |||||||
| 122 | BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES | 22,302 | 22,302 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 122A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 11,910 | 11,910 | ||||
| CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 126 | CBRN DEFENSE | 25,828 | 25,828 | ||||
| 127 | SMOKE & OBSCURANT FAMILY: SOF (NON AAO ITEM) | 5,050 | 5,050 | ||||
| BRIDGING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 128 | TACTICAL BRIDGING | 59,821 | 57,821 | ||||
| Contract delays | [–2,000] | ||||||
| 129 | TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON | 57,661 | 57,661 | ||||
| 130 | BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SET | 17,966 | 17,966 | ||||
| 131 | COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP | 43,155 | 43,155 | ||||
| ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 132 | HANDHELD STANDOFF MINEFIELD DETECTION SYS-HST | 7,570 | 7,570 | ||||
| 133 | GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) | 37,025 | 37,025 | ||||
| 135 | HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) | 83,082 | 54,082 | ||||
| Unjustified unit cost growth | [–29,000] | ||||||
| 136 | ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 137 | EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION | 23,115 | 23,115 | ||||
| 138 | ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS | 101,056 | 101,056 | ||||
| 140 | RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS | 18,684 | 18,684 | ||||
| 142 | FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS | 8,245 | 6,245 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–2,000] | ||||||
| COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 143 | HEATERS AND ECU'S | 7,336 | 7,336 | ||||
| 145 | PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) | 4,281 | 4,281 | ||||
| 146 | GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM | 111,955 | 111,955 | ||||
| 147 | MOBILE SOLDIER POWER | 31,364 | 29,364 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–2,000] | ||||||
| 149 | FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT | 1,673 | 1,673 | ||||
| 150 | CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM | 43,622 | 43,622 | ||||
| 151 | FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS | 11,451 | 11,451 | ||||
| 152 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) | 5,167 | 5,167 | ||||
| PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 154 | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER | 74,867 | 74,867 | ||||
| MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 155 | COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL | 68,225 | 68,225 | ||||
| MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 156 | MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS | 55,053 | 55,053 | ||||
| 157 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) | 5,608 | 5,608 | ||||
| CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 161 | HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR | 500 | 500 | ||||
| 162 | TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED | 4,835 | 4,835 | ||||
| 163 | ALL TERRAIN CRANES | 23,936 | 23,936 | ||||
| 164 | HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) | 27,188 | 27,188 | ||||
| 166 | CONST EQUIP ESP | 34,790 | 34,790 | ||||
| 167 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) | 4,381 | 4,381 | ||||
| RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 168 | ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP | 35,194 | 35,194 | ||||
| 169 | MANEUVER SUPPORT VESSEL (MSV) | 14,185 | 14,185 | ||||
| 170 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) | 6,920 | 6,920 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 171 | GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP | 58,566 | 58,566 | ||||
| 172 | TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWER RECAPITALIZATION | 14,814 | 14,814 | ||||
| MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 173 | FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS | 14,864 | 14,864 | ||||
| TRAINING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 174 | COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT | 123,411 | 123,411 | ||||
| 175 | TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM | 220,707 | 220,707 | ||||
| 176 | SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT (STE) | 20,749 | 15,749 | ||||
| Program adjustment | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 178 | AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER | 4,840 | 4,840 | ||||
| 179 | GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING | 15,463 | 15,463 | ||||
| TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) | |||||||
| 180 | CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT | 3,030 | 3,030 | ||||
| 181 | INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) | 76,980 | 76,980 | ||||
| 182 | TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) | 16,415 | 13,415 | ||||
| Historical underexecution | [–3,000] | ||||||
| OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 184 | RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 9,877 | 9,877 | ||||
| 185 | PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) | 82,158 | 82,158 | ||||
| 186 | BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT | 15,340 | 15,340 | ||||
| 187 | MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) | 50,458 | 50,458 | ||||
| 189 | BUILDING, PRE-FAB, RELOCATABLE | 14,400 | 14,400 | ||||
| 190 | SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING | 9,821 | 9,821 | ||||
| OPA2 | |||||||
| 192 | INITIAL SPARES—C&E | 9,757 | 9,757 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 7,451,301 | 7,292,799 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| COMBAT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 001 | F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET | 1,748,934 | 1,730,934 | ||||
| ECO and ancillary equipment excess growth | [–18,000] | ||||||
| 002 | F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET | 55,128 | 51,128 | ||||
| Excess engine cost growth | [–4,000] | ||||||
| 003 | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV | 2,272,301 | 2,162,301 | ||||
| Target cost savings | [–110,000] | ||||||
| 004 | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV | 339,053 | 339,053 | ||||
| 005 | JSF STOVL | 1,342,035 | 1,256,035 | ||||
| Target cost savings | [–86,000] | ||||||
| 006 | JSF STOVL | 291,804 | 291,804 | ||||
| 007 | CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) | 807,876 | 807,876 | ||||
| 008 | CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) | 215,014 | 215,014 | ||||
| 009 | V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) | 966,666 | 1,184,766 | ||||
| Program increase | [248,100] | ||||||
| Support cost growth | [–30,000] | ||||||
| 010 | V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) | 27,104 | 27,104 | ||||
| 011 | H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) | 62,003 | 62,003 | ||||
| 013 | MH–60R (MYP) | 894 | 894 | ||||
| 014 | P–8A POSEIDON | 1,206,701 | 1,636,601 | ||||
| Contract negotiations savings | [–42,900] | ||||||
| Line shutdown costs early to need | [–68,400] | ||||||
| Navy unfunded priority | [541,200] | ||||||
| 016 | E–2D ADV HAWKEYE | 744,484 | 896,784 | ||||
| GFE excess cost growth | [–3,500] | ||||||
| Navy unfunded priority | [173,000] | ||||||
| NRE excess cost growth | [–17,200] | ||||||
| 017 | E–2D ADV HAWKEYE | 190,204 | 190,204 | ||||
| TRAINER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 019 | ADVANCED HELICOPTER TRAINING SYSTEM | 261,160 | 261,160 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 020 | KC–130J | 240,840 | 221,840 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–19,000] | ||||||
| 021 | KC–130J | 66,061 | 66,061 | ||||
| 022 | F–5 | 39,676 | 39,676 | ||||
| 023 | MQ–4 TRITON | 473,134 | 448,134 | ||||
| PGSE excess cost growth | [–25,000] | ||||||
| 024 | MQ–4 TRITON | 20,139 | 20,139 | ||||
| 025 | MQ–8 UAV | 44,957 | 44,957 | ||||
| 026 | STUASL0 UAV | 43,819 | 43,819 | ||||
| 028 | VH–92A EXECUTIVE HELO | 658,067 | 658,067 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 029 | AEA SYSTEMS | 44,470 | 44,470 | ||||
| 030 | AV–8 SERIES | 39,472 | 39,472 | ||||
| 031 | ADVERSARY | 3,415 | 3,415 | ||||
| 032 | F–18 SERIES | 1,207,089 | 1,138,089 | ||||
| Accelerate RWR modernization | [10,000] | ||||||
| Early to need | [–79,000] | ||||||
| 033 | H–53 SERIES | 68,385 | 68,385 | ||||
| 034 | MH–60 SERIES | 149,797 | 152,297 | ||||
| Demonstrate alternative low frequency active sonars | [2,500] | ||||||
| 035 | H–1 SERIES | 114,059 | 114,059 | ||||
| 036 | EP–3 SERIES | 8,655 | 8,655 | ||||
| 038 | E–2 SERIES | 117,059 | 117,059 | ||||
| 039 | TRAINER A/C SERIES | 5,616 | 5,616 | ||||
| 040 | C–2A | 15,747 | 15,747 | ||||
| 041 | C–130 SERIES | 122,671 | 122,671 | ||||
| 042 | FEWSG | 509 | 509 | ||||
| 043 | CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES | 8,767 | 8,767 | ||||
| 044 | E–6 SERIES | 169,827 | 169,827 | ||||
| 045 | EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES | 8,933 | 8,933 | ||||
| 047 | T–45 SERIES | 186,022 | 184,314 | ||||
| NRE previously funded | [–1,708] | ||||||
| 048 | POWER PLANT CHANGES | 16,136 | 16,136 | ||||
| 049 | JPATS SERIES | 21,824 | 21,824 | ||||
| 050 | AVIATION LIFE SUPPORT MODS | 39,762 | 39,762 | ||||
| 051 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 162,839 | 159,565 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–3,274] | ||||||
| 052 | COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES | 102,107 | 75,107 | ||||
| Computing and displays concurrency and equipment growth early to need | [–27,000] | ||||||
| 053 | COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM | 2,100 | 2,100 | ||||
| 054 | ID SYSTEMS | 41,437 | 33,637 | ||||
| Unjustified unit cost growth | [–7,800] | ||||||
| 055 | P–8 SERIES | 107,539 | 107,539 | ||||
| 056 | MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION | 26,536 | 26,536 | ||||
| 057 | MQ–8 SERIES | 34,686 | 34,686 | ||||
| 058 | V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY | 325,367 | 325,367 | ||||
| 059 | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) | 6,223 | 6,223 | ||||
| 060 | F–35 STOVL SERIES | 65,585 | 65,585 | ||||
| 061 | F–35 CV SERIES | 15,358 | 15,358 | ||||
| 062 | QRC | 165,016 | 146,558 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–18,458] | ||||||
| 063 | MQ–4 SERIES | 27,994 | 27,994 | ||||
| 064 | RQ–21 SERIES | 66,282 | 66,282 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 067 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 2,166,788 | 2,102,788 | ||||
| MQ–4 Triton spares excess growth | [–64,000] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 068 | COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT | 491,025 | 470,025 | ||||
| Other flight training previously funded | [–21,000] | ||||||
| 069 | AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 71,335 | 71,335 | ||||
| 070 | WAR CONSUMABLES | 41,086 | 32,086 | ||||
| BRU–61 previously funded | [–9,000] | ||||||
| 072 | SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 135,740 | 115,740 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 073 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 892 | 892 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 18,522,204 | 18,821,764 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| MODIFICATION OF MISSILES | |||||||
| 001 | TRIDENT II MODS | 1,177,251 | 1,157,651 | ||||
| W76–2 low-yield deployment | [–19,600] | ||||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 002 | MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 7,142 | 7,142 | ||||
| STRATEGIC MISSILES | |||||||
| 003 | TOMAHAWK | 386,730 | 386,730 | ||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 004 | AMRAAM | 224,502 | 191,502 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–33,000] | ||||||
| 005 | SIDEWINDER | 119,456 | 119,456 | ||||
| 007 | STANDARD MISSILE | 404,523 | 379,523 | ||||
| SM–6 multi-year procurement savings | [–25,000] | ||||||
| 008 | STANDARD MISSILE | 96,085 | 96,085 | ||||
| 009 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II | 118,466 | 118,466 | ||||
| 010 | RAM | 106,765 | 106,765 | ||||
| 012 | HELLFIRE | 1,525 | 1,525 | ||||
| 015 | AERIAL TARGETS | 145,880 | 145,880 | ||||
| 016 | DRONES AND DECOYS | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| 017 | OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT | 3,388 | 3,388 | ||||
| 018 | LRASM | 143,200 | 168,200 | ||||
| Navy unfunded priority | [25,000] | ||||||
| 019 | LCS OTH MISSILE | 38,137 | 38,137 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF MISSILES | |||||||
| 020 | ESSM | 128,059 | 118,059 | ||||
| Production support excess to need | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 021 | HARPOON MODS | 25,447 | 25,447 | ||||
| 022 | HARM MODS | 183,740 | 183,740 | ||||
| 023 | STANDARD MISSILES MODS | 22,500 | 22,500 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 024 | WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 1,958 | 1,958 | ||||
| 025 | FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON | 67,380 | 67,380 | ||||
| ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 027 | ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 109,427 | 109,427 | ||||
| TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP | |||||||
| 028 | SSTD | 5,561 | 5,561 | ||||
| 029 | MK–48 TORPEDO | 114,000 | 130,000 | ||||
| Program increase | [16,000] | ||||||
| 030 | ASW TARGETS | 15,095 | 15,095 | ||||
| MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP | |||||||
| 031 | MK–54 TORPEDO MODS | 119,453 | 111,453 | ||||
| HAAWC cost growth | [–8,000] | ||||||
| 032 | MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS | 39,508 | 39,508 | ||||
| 033 | QUICKSTRIKE MINE | 5,183 | 5,183 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 034 | TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 79,028 | 79,028 | ||||
| 035 | ASW RANGE SUPPORT | 3,890 | 3,890 | ||||
| DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | |||||||
| 036 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 3,803 | 3,803 | ||||
| GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS | |||||||
| 037 | SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS | 14,797 | 14,797 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS | |||||||
| 038 | CIWS MODS | 44,126 | 0 | ||||
| Unjustified OCO request | [–44,126] | ||||||
| 039 | COAST GUARD WEAPONS | 44,980 | 44,980 | ||||
| 040 | GUN MOUNT MODS | 66,376 | 66,376 | ||||
| 041 | LCS MODULE WEAPONS | 14,585 | 0 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–14,585] | ||||||
| 043 | AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS | 7,160 | 7,160 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 045 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 126,138 | 126,138 | ||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 4,235,244 | 4,121,933 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 36,028 | 20,028 | ||||
| Fuze contract delay and unit cost growth | [–16,000] | ||||||
| 002 | JDAM | 70,413 | 62,913 | ||||
| JDAM tail kit unit cost growth | [–7,500] | ||||||
| 003 | AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 31,756 | 22,256 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–9,500] | ||||||
| 004 | MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION | 4,793 | 4,793 | ||||
| 005 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 34,708 | 27,208 | ||||
| Q1300 LGTR unit cost growth | [–7,500] | ||||||
| 006 | CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES | 45,738 | 38,738 | ||||
| Contract and schedule delays | [–7,000] | ||||||
| 007 | AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES | 77,301 | 67,801 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–9,500] | ||||||
| 008 | JATOS | 7,262 | 7,262 | ||||
| 009 | 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION | 22,594 | 22,594 | ||||
| 010 | INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION | 37,193 | 37,193 | ||||
| 011 | OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION | 39,491 | 29,491 | ||||
| CART 20MM contract award delay | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 012 | SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO | 47,896 | 47,896 | ||||
| 013 | PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION | 10,621 | 10,621 | ||||
| 015 | AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 2,386 | 2,386 | ||||
| MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 016 | MORTARS | 55,543 | 50,543 | ||||
| Prior year underexecution | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 017 | DIRECT SUPPORT MUNITIONS | 131,765 | 131,765 | ||||
| 018 | INFANTRY WEAPONS AMMUNITION | 78,056 | 74,556 | ||||
| Underexecution and schedule delays | [–3,500] | ||||||
| 019 | COMBAT SUPPORT MUNITIONS | 40,048 | 34,048 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–6,000] | ||||||
| 020 | AMMO MODERNIZATION | 14,325 | 14,325 | ||||
| 021 | ARTILLERY MUNITIONS | 188,876 | 167,476 | ||||
| DA 54 contract delay | [–21,400] | ||||||
| 022 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 4,521 | 4,521 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 981,314 | 878,414 | |||||
| SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY | |||||||
| FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE SHIPS | |||||||
| 001 | OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE | 1,698,907 | 1,823,907 | ||||
| Submarine supplier development | [125,000] | ||||||
| OTHER WARSHIPS | |||||||
| 002 | CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM | 2,347,000 | 1,952,000 | ||||
| Basic construction/conversion excess cost growth | [–302,000] | ||||||
| Propulsion equipment excess cost growth | [–93,000] | ||||||
| 003 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE | 7,155,946 | 6,605,946 | ||||
| Block V MYP savings redirected to fund USS Boise, USS Hartford, and USS Columbus availabilities | [–550,000] | ||||||
| 004 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE | 2,769,552 | 2,769,552 | ||||
| 005 | CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS | 647,926 | 453,926 | ||||
| CVN–74 RCOH basic construction/conversion excess cost growth | [–165,000] | ||||||
| CVN–74 RCOH ordnance excess cost growth | [–46,000] | ||||||
| CVN–75 RCOH restoration | [17,000] | ||||||
| 007 | DDG 1000 | 155,944 | 155,944 | ||||
| 008 | DDG–51 | 5,099,295 | 5,013,295 | ||||
| Basic ship construction excess cost growth | [–86,000] | ||||||
| 009 | DDG–51 | 224,028 | 224,028 | ||||
| 011 | FFG-FRIGATE | 1,281,177 | 1,266,177 | ||||
| Change order early to need | [–15,000] | ||||||
| AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS | |||||||
| 012 | LPD FLIGHT II | 100,000 | |||||
| Transfer from line 13 | [100,000] | ||||||
| 013 | LPD FLIGHT II | 247,100 | 147,100 | ||||
| Transfer to line 12 | [–100,000] | ||||||
| 017 | EXPEDITIONARY FAST TRANSPORT (EPF) | 49,000 | |||||
| Medical transport modification for EPF–14 Navy unfunded priority | [49,000] | ||||||
| AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST | |||||||
| 018 | TAO FLEET OILER | 981,215 | 607,215 | ||||
| Full funding early to need | [–447,000] | ||||||
| Transfer from Line 19 | [73,000] | ||||||
| 019 | TAO FLEET OILER | 73,000 | 0 | ||||
| Transfer to Line 18 | [–73,000] | ||||||
| 020 | TOWING, SALVAGE, AND RESCUE SHIP (ATS) | 150,282 | 150,282 | ||||
| 022 | LCU 1700 | 85,670 | 85,670 | ||||
| 023 | OUTFITTING | 754,679 | 643,554 | ||||
| ESB–9 Outfitting early to need | [–11,125] | ||||||
| Excess cost growth | [–100,000] | ||||||
| 024 | SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR | 84,800 | |||||
| Program increase | [130,000] | ||||||
| Program decrease | [–45,200] | ||||||
| 025 | SERVICE CRAFT | 56,289 | 56,289 | ||||
| 028 | COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS | 55,700 | 25,700 | ||||
| ESB change order prior year carryover | [–30,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY | 23,783,710 | 22,214,385 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 001 | SURFACE POWER EQUIPMENT | 14,490 | 14,490 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 002 | SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E | 31,583 | 23,503 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–8,080] | ||||||
| NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 003 | OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT | 77,404 | 60,830 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–16,574] | ||||||
| OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 004 | SUB PERISCOPE, IMAGING AND SUPT EQUIP PROG | 160,803 | 160,803 | ||||
| 005 | DDG MOD | 566,140 | 566,140 | ||||
| 006 | FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 18,223 | 18,223 | ||||
| 007 | COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD | 2,086 | 2,086 | ||||
| 008 | LHA/LHD MIDLIFE | 95,651 | 64,651 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–31,000] | ||||||
| 009 | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 23,910 | 23,910 | ||||
| 010 | SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 44,895 | 25,300 | ||||
| Acoustic superiority early to need | [–11,855] | ||||||
| Excess cost growth | [–7,740] | ||||||
| 011 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 28,465 | 28,465 | ||||
| 012 | LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 19,426 | 19,426 | ||||
| 013 | SUBMARINE BATTERIES | 26,290 | 26,290 | ||||
| 014 | LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 46,945 | 46,945 | ||||
| 015 | DDG 1000 CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 9,930 | 9,930 | ||||
| 016 | STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP | 14,331 | 14,331 | ||||
| 017 | DSSP EQUIPMENT | 2,909 | 2,909 | ||||
| 018 | CG MODERNIZATION | 193,990 | 193,990 | ||||
| 019 | LCAC | 3,392 | 3,392 | ||||
| 020 | UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS | 71,240 | 71,240 | ||||
| 021 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 102,543 | 102,543 | ||||
| 022 | CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS | 2,961 | 2,961 | ||||
| 023 | SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 6,635 | 6,635 | ||||
| REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 024 | REACTOR POWER UNITS | 5,340 | 5,340 | ||||
| 025 | REACTOR COMPONENTS | 465,726 | 465,726 | ||||
| OCEAN ENGINEERING | |||||||
| 026 | DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT | 11,854 | 10,706 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–1,148] | ||||||
| SMALL BOATS | |||||||
| 027 | STANDARD BOATS | 79,102 | 73,967 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–5,135] | ||||||
| PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 028 | OPERATING FORCES IPE | 202,238 | 202,238 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP SUPPORT | |||||||
| 029 | LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT | 51,553 | 33,237 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–18,316] | ||||||
| 030 | LCS MCM MISSION MODULES | 197,129 | 77,129 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–120,000] | ||||||
| 031 | LCS ASW MISSION MODULES | 27,754 | 25,254 | ||||
| Demonstrate alternate low frequency active sonar | [2,500] | ||||||
| Excess cost growth | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 032 | LCS SUW MISSION MODULES | 26,566 | 14,566 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–12,000] | ||||||
| 033 | LCS IN-SERVICE MODERNIZATION | 84,972 | 84,972 | ||||
| 034 | SMALL & MEDIUM UUV | 40,547 | 10,601 | ||||
| Early to need | [–29,946] | ||||||
| LOGISTIC SUPPORT | |||||||
| 035 | LSD MIDLIFE & MODERNIZATION | 40,269 | 40,269 | ||||
| SHIP SONARS | |||||||
| 036 | SPQ–9B RADAR | 26,195 | 26,195 | ||||
| 037 | AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM | 125,237 | 125,237 | ||||
| 038 | SSN ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT | 366,968 | 354,968 | ||||
| Low cost conformal array contract delay | [–12,000] | ||||||
| 039 | UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 8,967 | 8,967 | ||||
| ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 040 | SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM | 23,545 | 23,545 | ||||
| 041 | SSTD | 12,439 | 12,439 | ||||
| 042 | FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 128,441 | 128,441 | ||||
| 043 | SURTASS | 21,923 | 21,923 | ||||
| ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 044 | AN/SLQ–32 | 420,154 | 420,154 | ||||
| RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 045 | SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT | 194,758 | 194,758 | ||||
| 046 | AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) | 5,368 | 5,368 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 047 | COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY | 35,128 | 35,128 | ||||
| 048 | NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) | 15,154 | 15,154 | ||||
| 049 | ATDLS | 52,753 | 52,753 | ||||
| 050 | NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) | 3,390 | 3,390 | ||||
| 051 | MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT | 19,448 | 19,448 | ||||
| 052 | SHALLOW WATER MCM | 8,730 | 8,730 | ||||
| 053 | NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) | 32,674 | 32,674 | ||||
| 054 | AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE | 2,617 | 2,617 | ||||
| 055 | STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP | 7,973 | 7,973 | ||||
| AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 056 | ASHORE ATC EQUIPMENT | 72,406 | 72,406 | ||||
| 057 | AFLOAT ATC EQUIPMENT | 67,410 | 67,410 | ||||
| 058 | ID SYSTEMS | 26,059 | 15,464 | ||||
| OE–120/UPX antenna insufficient budget justification | [–10,595] | ||||||
| 059 | JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEM | 92,695 | 61,348 | ||||
| Early to need | [–31,347] | ||||||
| 060 | NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 15,296 | 15,296 | ||||
| OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 061 | TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS | 36,226 | 36,226 | ||||
| 062 | DCGS-N | 21,788 | 21,788 | ||||
| 063 | CANES | 426,654 | 396,654 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–30,000] | ||||||
| 064 | RADIAC | 6,450 | 6,450 | ||||
| 065 | CANES-INTELL | 52,713 | 52,713 | ||||
| 066 | GPETE | 13,028 | 13,028 | ||||
| 067 | MASF | 5,193 | 5,193 | ||||
| 068 | INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY | 6,028 | 6,028 | ||||
| 069 | EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION | 4,209 | 4,209 | ||||
| 070 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 168,436 | 151,593 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–16,843] | ||||||
| SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 071 | SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS | 55,853 | 55,853 | ||||
| 072 | SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION | 137,861 | 117,861 | ||||
| STACC cost growth | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 073 | COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M | 35,093 | 35,093 | ||||
| SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 074 | SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT | 50,833 | 50,833 | ||||
| 075 | SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT | 69,643 | 60,643 | ||||
| Buoy shape improvement unjustified request | [–9,000] | ||||||
| SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 076 | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 45,841 | 45,841 | ||||
| 077 | NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) | 88,021 | 88,021 | ||||
| SHORE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 078 | JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) | 4,293 | 4,293 | ||||
| CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 079 | INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) | 166,540 | 166,540 | ||||
| 080 | MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM | 968 | 968 | ||||
| CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 081 | CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP | 13,090 | 13,090 | ||||
| OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT | |||||||
| 083 | COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT | 61,370 | 61,370 | ||||
| SONOBUOYS | |||||||
| 085 | SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES | 260,644 | 296,344 | ||||
| Navy unfunded priority | [35,700] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 086 | MINOTAUR | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 087 | WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 101,843 | 94,843 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–7,000] | ||||||
| 088 | AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 145,601 | 112,181 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–20,000] | ||||||
| Program decrease | [–13,420] | ||||||
| 089 | ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) | 4,725 | 4,725 | ||||
| 090 | METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT | 14,687 | 14,687 | ||||
| 092 | LEGACY AIRBORNE MCM | 19,250 | 19,250 | ||||
| 093 | LAMPS EQUIPMENT | 792 | 792 | ||||
| 094 | AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 55,415 | 52,415 | ||||
| Contract delay | [–3,000] | ||||||
| 095 | UMCS-UNMAN CARRIER AVIATION(UCA)MISSION CNTRL | 32,668 | 32,668 | ||||
| SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 096 | SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT | 5,451 | 5,451 | ||||
| SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 097 | HARPOON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,100 | 1,100 | ||||
| 098 | SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 228,104 | 243,304 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–25,000] | ||||||
| Program increase | [40,200] | ||||||
| 099 | TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 78,593 | 78,593 | ||||
| FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 100 | STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP | 280,510 | 280,510 | ||||
| ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 101 | SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS | 148,547 | 138,547 | ||||
| Excess cost growth | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 102 | ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 21,130 | 21,130 | ||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 103 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 15,244 | 15,244 | ||||
| 104 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 5,071 | 5,071 | ||||
| OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE | |||||||
| 105 | ANTI-SHIP MISSILE DECOY SYSTEM | 41,962 | 41,962 | ||||
| 106 | SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS | 75,057 | 75,057 | ||||
| 107 | SURFACE TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 233,175 | 189,253 | ||||
| LCS trainer equipment early to need | [–43,922] | ||||||
| CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 108 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 4,562 | 4,562 | ||||
| 109 | GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS | 10,974 | 10,974 | ||||
| 110 | CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP | 43,191 | 43,191 | ||||
| 111 | FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 21,142 | 11,642 | ||||
| Contract delays | [–9,500] | ||||||
| 112 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 33,432 | 32,032 | ||||
| JLTV contract delay | [–1,400] | ||||||
| 114 | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 2,633 | 2,633 | ||||
| 115 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION | 53,467 | 53,467 | ||||
| 116 | PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES | 1,173 | 1,173 | ||||
| SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 117 | SUPPLY EQUIPMENT | 16,730 | 16,730 | ||||
| 118 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 5,389 | 5,389 | ||||
| 119 | SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS | 654,674 | 654,674 | ||||
| TRAINING DEVICES | |||||||
| 120 | TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 3,633 | 3,633 | ||||
| 121 | TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT | 97,636 | 82,536 | ||||
| Reduction in one Training Support Vessel | [–15,100] | ||||||
| COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 122 | COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 66,102 | 50,102 | ||||
| Prior year underexecution | [–16,000] | ||||||
| 123 | MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 3,633 | 3,633 | ||||
| 125 | NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 6,097 | 6,097 | ||||
| 126 | OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 16,905 | 16,905 | ||||
| 127 | C4ISR EQUIPMENT | 30,146 | 30,146 | ||||
| 128 | ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 21,986 | 21,986 | ||||
| 129 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 160,046 | 160,046 | ||||
| 130 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 56,899 | 56,899 | ||||
| OTHER | |||||||
| 133 | NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE | 122,832 | 122,832 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 133A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 16,346 | 16,346 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 134 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 375,608 | 352,140 | ||||
| JPALS spares early to need | [–8,137] | ||||||
| LCS spares early to need | [–15,331] | ||||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 9,652,956 | 9,146,967 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | AAV7A1 PIP | 39,495 | 39,495 | ||||
| 002 | AMPHIBIOUS COMBAT VEHICLE 1.1 | 317,935 | 313,135 | ||||
| Excess engineering change orders | [–4,800] | ||||||
| 003 | LAV PIP | 60,734 | 60,734 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS | |||||||
| 004 | 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER | 25,065 | 25,065 | ||||
| 005 | ARTILLERY WEAPONS SYSTEM | 100,002 | 90,002 | ||||
| Equipment previously funded and cost growth | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 006 | WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION | 31,945 | 31,945 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 007 | MODIFICATION KITS | 22,760 | 22,760 | ||||
| GUIDED MISSILES | |||||||
| 008 | GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE | 175,998 | 175,998 | ||||
| 009 | ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-JAVELIN | 20,207 | 20,207 | ||||
| 010 | FAMILY ANTI-ARMOR WEAPON SYSTEMS (FOAAWS) | 21,913 | 21,913 | ||||
| 011 | ANTI-ARMOR MISSILE-TOW | 60,501 | 60,501 | ||||
| 012 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 29,062 | 28,062 | ||||
| Unit cost discrepancy | [–1,000] | ||||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 013 | COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C | 37,203 | 32,203 | ||||
| AN/MRQ–13 communications subsystems upgrades unjustified growth | [–5,000] | ||||||
| REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 014 | REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | 55,156 | 55,156 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) | |||||||
| 015 | MODIFICATION KITS | 4,945 | 4,945 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 016 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) | 112,124 | 83,124 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–29,000] | ||||||
| 017 | AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS | 17,408 | 17,408 | ||||
| RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 018 | RADAR SYSTEMS | 329 | 329 | ||||
| 019 | GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) | 273,022 | 273,022 | ||||
| INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 021 | GCSS-MC | 4,484 | 4,484 | ||||
| 022 | FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 35,488 | 35,488 | ||||
| 023 | INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 56,896 | 54,396 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–2,500] | ||||||
| 025 | UNMANNED AIR SYSTEMS (INTEL) | 34,711 | 34,711 | ||||
| 026 | DCGS-MC | 32,562 | 32,562 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 030 | NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN) | 114,901 | 114,901 | ||||
| 031 | COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES | 51,094 | 51,094 | ||||
| 032 | COMMAND POST SYSTEMS | 108,897 | 108,897 | ||||
| 033 | RADIO SYSTEMS | 227,320 | 212,320 | ||||
| Cost growth and early to need | [–15,000] | ||||||
| 034 | COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS | 31,685 | 23,685 | ||||
| ECP small form factor previously funded | [–8,000] | ||||||
| 035 | COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT | 21,140 | 21,140 | ||||
| 036 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 27,632 | 27,632 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 036A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 5,535 | 5,535 | ||||
| ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 037 | COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES | 28,913 | 28,913 | ||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 038 | MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS | 19,234 | 19,234 | ||||
| 039 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 558,107 | 556,107 | ||||
| ECP previously funded | [–2,000] | ||||||
| 040 | FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS | 2,693 | 2,693 | ||||
| ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 041 | ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT | 495 | 495 | ||||
| 042 | TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS | 52 | 52 | ||||
| 043 | POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED | 22,441 | 22,441 | ||||
| 044 | AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 7,101 | 7,101 | ||||
| 045 | EOD SYSTEMS | 44,700 | 44,700 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 046 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 15,404 | 15,404 | ||||
| GENERAL PROPERTY | |||||||
| 047 | FIELD MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | 2,898 | 2,898 | ||||
| 048 | TRAINING DEVICES | 149,567 | 126,567 | ||||
| ODS unjustified request | [–23,000] | ||||||
| 049 | FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | 35,622 | 35,622 | ||||
| 050 | ULTRA-LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (ULTV) | 647 | 647 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 051 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 10,956 | 10,956 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 052 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 33,470 | 33,470 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 3,090,449 | 2,990,149 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL FORCES | |||||||
| 001 | F–35 | 4,274,359 | 5,126,409 | ||||
| Program increase | [1,042,800] | ||||||
| Target cost savings | [–190,750] | ||||||
| 002 | F–35 | 655,500 | 655,500 | ||||
| 003 | F–15E | 1,050,000 | 941,000 | ||||
| Unjustified non-recurring engineering | [–109,000] | ||||||
| TACTICAL AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 005 | KC–46A MDAP | 2,234,529 | 2,199,705 | ||||
| Excess to need | [–34,824] | ||||||
| OTHER AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 006 | C–130J | 12,156 | 404,156 | ||||
| Program increase | [392,000] | ||||||
| 008 | MC–130J | 871,207 | 871,207 | ||||
| 009 | MC–130J | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||||
| HELICOPTERS | |||||||
| 010 | COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER | 884,235 | 876,235 | ||||
| Excess to need | [–8,000] | ||||||
| MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 011 | C–37A | 161,000 | 161,000 | ||||
| 012 | CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C | 2,767 | 2,767 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 014 | TARGET DRONES | 130,837 | 130,837 | ||||
| 015 | COMPASS CALL | 114,095 | 114,095 | ||||
| 017 | MQ–9 | 189,205 | 313,005 | ||||
| Program increase | [137,800] | ||||||
| Unit cost growth | [–14,000] | ||||||
| STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 019 | B–2A | 9,582 | 9,582 | ||||
| 020 | B–1B | 22,111 | 22,111 | ||||
| 021 | B–52 | 69,648 | 69,648 | ||||
| 022 | LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES | 43,758 | 43,758 | ||||
| TACTICAL AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 023 | A–10 | 132,069 | 132,069 | ||||
| 024 | E–11 BACN/HAG | 70,027 | 90,027 | ||||
| Aircraft increase | [20,000] | ||||||
| 025 | F–15 | 481,073 | 480,443 | ||||
| F–15C MUOS ahead of need | [–630] | ||||||
| 026 | F–16 | 234,782 | 234,782 | ||||
| 028 | F–22A | 323,597 | 323,597 | ||||
| 030 | F–35 MODIFICATIONS | 343,590 | 343,590 | ||||
| 031 | F–15 EPAW | 149,047 | 25,047 | ||||
| Prior-year carryover | [–124,000] | ||||||
| 032 | INCREMENT 3.2B | 20,213 | 20,213 | ||||
| 033 | KC–46A MDAP | 10,213 | 3,639 | ||||
| Excess to need | [–6,574] | ||||||
| AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 034 | C–5 | 73,550 | 73,550 | ||||
| 036 | C–17A | 60,244 | 60,244 | ||||
| 037 | C–21 | 216 | 216 | ||||
| 038 | C–32A | 11,511 | 11,511 | ||||
| 039 | C–37A | 435 | 435 | ||||
| TRAINER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 040 | GLIDER MODS | 138 | 138 | ||||
| 041 | T–6 | 11,826 | 11,826 | ||||
| 042 | T–1 | 26,787 | 26,787 | ||||
| 043 | T–38 | 37,341 | 45,041 | ||||
| T–38 A/B ejection seat safety | [7,700] | ||||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 044 | U–2 MODS | 86,896 | 119,896 | ||||
| Increase for U–2 enhancements | [33,000] | ||||||
| 045 | KC–10A (ATCA) | 2,108 | 2,108 | ||||
| 046 | C–12 | 3,021 | 3,021 | ||||
| 047 | VC–25A MOD | 48,624 | 48,624 | ||||
| 048 | C–40 | 256 | 256 | ||||
| 049 | C–130 | 52,066 | 186,066 | ||||
| 3.5 Engine Enhancement Package | [79,000] | ||||||
| NP–2000 prop blade upgrades | [55,000] | ||||||
| 050 | C–130J MODS | 141,686 | 141,686 | ||||
| 051 | C–135 | 124,491 | 124,491 | ||||
| 053 | COMPASS CALL | 110,754 | 110,754 | ||||
| 054 | COMBAT FLIGHT INSPECTION—CFIN | 508 | 508 | ||||
| 055 | RC–135 | 227,673 | 227,673 | ||||
| 056 | E–3 | 216,299 | 216,299 | ||||
| 057 | E–4 | 58,477 | 58,477 | ||||
| 058 | E–8 | 28,778 | 56,778 | ||||
| Increase for re-engining | [28,000] | ||||||
| 059 | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CNTRL SYS (AWACS) 40/45 | 36,000 | 36,000 | ||||
| 060 | FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS | 7,910 | 7,910 | ||||
| 061 | H–1 | 3,817 | 3,817 | ||||
| 062 | H–60 | 20,879 | 20,879 | ||||
| 063 | RQ–4 MODS | 1,704 | 1,704 | ||||
| 064 | HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS | 51,482 | 51,482 | ||||
| 065 | OTHER AIRCRAFT | 50,098 | 50,098 | ||||
| 066 | MQ–9 MODS | 383,594 | 251,594 | ||||
| Production rate adjustment of DAS–4 sensor | [–132,000] | ||||||
| 068 | CV–22 MODS | 65,348 | 65,348 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 069 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 708,230 | 584,830 | ||||
| Unjustified F–15C requirements | [–123,400] | ||||||
| COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 072 | AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP | 84,938 | 84,938 | ||||
| POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT | |||||||
| 073 | B–2A | 1,403 | 1,403 | ||||
| 074 | B–2B | 42,234 | 42,234 | ||||
| 075 | B–52 | 4,641 | 4,641 | ||||
| 076 | C–17A | 124,805 | 124,805 | ||||
| 079 | F–15 | 2,589 | 2,589 | ||||
| 081 | F–16 | 15,348 | 14,748 | ||||
| Line shutdown early to need | [–600] | ||||||
| 084 | RQ–4 POST PRODUCTION CHARGES | 47,246 | 47,246 | ||||
| INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | |||||||
| 086 | INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS | 17,705 | 17,705 | ||||
| WAR CONSUMABLES | |||||||
| 087 | WAR CONSUMABLES | 32,102 | 32,102 | ||||
| OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | |||||||
| 088 | OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | 1,194,728 | 1,106,728 | ||||
| F–22 NGEN lab excess | [–72,000] | ||||||
| RQ–4 delayed obligations | [–16,000] | ||||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 090A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 34,193 | 34,193 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 16,784,279 | 17,747,801 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC | |||||||
| 001 | MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC | 55,888 | 55,888 | ||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 002 | REPLAC EQUIP & WAR CONSUMABLES | 9,100 | 9,100 | ||||
| 003 | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MUNITION | 15,000 | 0 | ||||
| Unjustified requirement (JAGM-F) | [–15,000] | ||||||
| 004 | JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE | 482,525 | 482,525 | ||||
| 006 | SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) | 160,408 | 160,408 | ||||
| 007 | AMRAAM | 332,250 | 332,250 | ||||
| 008 | PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE | 118,860 | 111,160 | ||||
| Unit cost savings | [–7,700] | ||||||
| 009 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 275,438 | 275,438 | ||||
| 010 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB II | 212,434 | 201,434 | ||||
| Unit cost growth | [–11,000] | ||||||
| INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | |||||||
| 011 | INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION | 801 | 801 | ||||
| CLASS IV | |||||||
| 012 | ICBM FUZE MOD | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 013 | ICBM FUZE MOD | 14,497 | 14,497 | ||||
| 014 | MM III MODIFICATIONS | 50,831 | 50,831 | ||||
| 015 | AGM–65D MAVERICK | 294 | 294 | ||||
| 016 | AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) | 77,387 | 77,387 | ||||
| MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 018 | MSL SPRS/REPAIR PARTS (INITIAL) | 1,910 | 1,910 | ||||
| 019 | REPLEN SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 82,490 | 82,490 | ||||
| SPECIAL PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 023 | SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS | 144,553 | 144,553 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 023A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 849,521 | 849,521 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 2,889,187 | 2,855,487 | |||||
| SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| SPACE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 001 | ADVANCED EHF | 31,894 | 31,894 | ||||
| 002 | AF SATELLITE COMM SYSTEM | 56,298 | 56,298 | ||||
| 004 | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS | 5,700 | 5,700 | ||||
| 005 | FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS | 34,020 | 24,020 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 007 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECH—SPACE | 3,244 | 3,244 | ||||
| 008 | GPSIII FOLLOW ON | 414,625 | 414,625 | ||||
| 009 | GPS III SPACE SEGMENT | 31,466 | 31,466 | ||||
| 012 | SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) | 32,031 | 32,031 | ||||
| 013 | MILSATCOM | 11,096 | 11,096 | ||||
| 015 | EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) | 1,237,635 | 1,237,635 | ||||
| 016 | SBIR HIGH (SPACE) | 233,952 | 218,012 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–15,940] | ||||||
| 017 | NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM | 7,432 | 7,432 | ||||
| 018 | ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM | 11,473 | 11,473 | ||||
| 019 | SPACE FENCE | 71,784 | 50,284 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–21,500] | ||||||
| 020 | SPACE MODS | 106,330 | 86,330 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 021 | SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE | 118,140 | 118,140 | ||||
| SSPARES | |||||||
| 022 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 7,263 | 7,263 | ||||
| TOTAL SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 2,414,383 | 2,346,943 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 001 | ROCKETS | 133,268 | 115,268 | ||||
| APKWS Mk 66 rocket motor price adjustment | [–18,000] | ||||||
| CARTRIDGES | |||||||
| 002 | CARTRIDGES | 140,449 | 140,449 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 003 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 29,313 | 29,313 | ||||
| 004 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 85,885 | 85,885 | ||||
| 006 | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 1,066,224 | 1,019,224 | ||||
| LJDAM sensor cost adjustment | [–10,000] | ||||||
| Tailkit unit cost adjustment | [–37,000] | ||||||
| 007 | B61 | 80,773 | 80,773 | ||||
| OTHER ITEMS | |||||||
| 009 | CAD/PAD | 47,069 | 47,069 | ||||
| 010 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) | 6,133 | 6,133 | ||||
| 011 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 533 | 533 | ||||
| 012 | MODIFICATIONS | 1,291 | 1,291 | ||||
| 013 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5,000,000 | 1,677 | 1,677 | ||||
| FLARES | |||||||
| 015 | FLARES | 36,116 | 36,116 | ||||
| FUZES | |||||||
| 016 | FUZES | 1,734 | 1,734 | ||||
| SMALL ARMS | |||||||
| 017 | SMALL ARMS | 37,496 | 32,496 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 1,667,961 | 1,597,961 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 15,238 | 15,238 | ||||
| CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE | 34,616 | 29,616 | ||||
| Unjustified unit cost increases | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 003 | CAP VEHICLES | 1,040 | 3,567 | ||||
| Program increase—communications | [1,867] | ||||||
| Program increase—vehicles | [660] | ||||||
| 004 | CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | 23,133 | 18,588 | ||||
| Program increase | [455] | ||||||
| Program reduction | [–5,000] | ||||||
| SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 005 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 32,027 | 22,027 | ||||
| Program reduction | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 006 | SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES | 1,315 | 1,315 | ||||
| 007 | SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | 14,593 | 9,593 | ||||
| Program reduction—prior year carryover | [–5,000] | ||||||
| FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 008 | FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES | 28,604 | 28,604 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 009 | MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES | 21,848 | 21,848 | ||||
| BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 010 | RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU | 2,925 | 3,259 | ||||
| Program increase | [334] | ||||||
| 011 | BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES | 55,776 | 52,876 | ||||
| Program increase | [2,100] | ||||||
| Program reduction | [–5,000] | ||||||
| COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) | |||||||
| 013 | COMSEC EQUIPMENT | 91,461 | 91,461 | ||||
| INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 014 | INTERNATIONAL INTEL TECH & ARCHITECTURES | 11,386 | 11,386 | ||||
| 015 | INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 7,619 | 7,619 | ||||
| 016 | INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT | 35,558 | 32,058 | ||||
| IMAD unjustified procurement | [–3,500] | ||||||
| ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 017 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS | 17,939 | 17,939 | ||||
| 019 | BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED | 3,063 | 3,063 | ||||
| 021 | WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST | 31,447 | 31,447 | ||||
| 022 | STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL | 5,090 | 5,090 | ||||
| 023 | CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX | 10,145 | 10,145 | ||||
| 024 | MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 14,508 | 14,508 | ||||
| 026 | INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN) | 9,901 | 9,901 | ||||
| SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS | |||||||
| 027 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 26,933 | 26,933 | ||||
| 028 | AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS | 2,756 | 2,756 | ||||
| 029 | BATTLEFIELD AIRBORNE CONTROL NODE (BACN) | 48,478 | 48,478 | ||||
| 030 | MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL | 21,186 | 21,186 | ||||
| 031 | AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM | 178,361 | 158,361 | ||||
| Program reduction | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 032 | COMBAT TRAINING RANGES | 233,993 | 247,593 | ||||
| Joint threat emitter increase | [13,600] | ||||||
| 033 | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N | 132,648 | 132,648 | ||||
| 034 | WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE (WAS) | 80,818 | 47,929 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–32,889] | ||||||
| 035 | C3 COUNTERMEASURES | 25,036 | 25,036 | ||||
| 036 | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM | 20,900 | 20,900 | ||||
| 037 | GCSS-AF FOS | 11,226 | 11,226 | ||||
| 038 | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING & MGT SYS | 1,905 | 1,905 | ||||
| 039 | MAINTENANCE REPAIR & OVERHAUL INITIATIVE | 1,912 | 1,912 | ||||
| 040 | THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM | 6,337 | 6,337 | ||||
| 041 | AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) | 33,243 | 33,243 | ||||
| AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 043 | BASE INFORMATION TRANSPT INFRAST (BITI) WIRED | 69,530 | 59,530 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 044 | AFNET | 147,063 | 147,063 | ||||
| 045 | JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) | 6,505 | 6,505 | ||||
| 046 | USCENTCOM | 20,190 | 20,190 | ||||
| 047 | USSTRATCOM | 11,244 | 11,244 | ||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BASE | |||||||
| 048 | TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT | 143,757 | 143,757 | ||||
| 050 | RADIO EQUIPMENT | 15,402 | 15,402 | ||||
| 051 | CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT | 3,211 | 3,211 | ||||
| 052 | BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE | 43,123 | 43,123 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 053 | COMM ELECT MODS | 14,500 | 14,500 | ||||
| PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP | |||||||
| 054 | PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT | 50,634 | 47,634 | ||||
| Unit cost increase and early to need | [–3,000] | ||||||
| DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ | |||||||
| 055 | POWER CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT | 11,000 | 11,000 | ||||
| 056 | MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP | 11,901 | 11,901 | ||||
| BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 057 | BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT | 23,963 | 23,963 | ||||
| 058 | ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT | 34,124 | 34,124 | ||||
| 059 | MOBILITY EQUIPMENT | 26,439 | 26,439 | ||||
| 060 | FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) | 24,255 | 24,255 | ||||
| 061 | BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 38,986 | 38,986 | ||||
| SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS | |||||||
| 063 | DARP RC135 | 26,716 | 26,716 | ||||
| 064 | DCGS-AF | 116,055 | 116,055 | ||||
| 066 | SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM | 835,148 | 835,148 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 066A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 18,292,807 | 18,292,807 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 067 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 81,340 | 81,340 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 21,342,857 | 21,262,484 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD | |||||||
| 022 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DPAA | 1,504 | 1,504 | ||||
| 045 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD | 43,705 | 43,705 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA | |||||||
| 044 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) | 1,533 | 133 | ||||
| Realignment to DISA for Sharkseer | [–1,400] | ||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | |||||||
| 049 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | 507 | 507 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 008 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY | 3,318 | 4,718 | ||||
| Realignment for Sharkseer | [1,400] | ||||||
| 009 | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 25,103 | 25,103 | ||||
| 010 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 26,416 | 26,416 | ||||
| 012 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK | 17,574 | 17,574 | ||||
| 014 | WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY | 45,079 | 45,079 | ||||
| 015 | SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE | 78,669 | 78,669 | ||||
| 016 | JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) | 88,000 | 83,000 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 017 | JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER | 107,907 | 107,907 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA | |||||||
| 019 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 8,122 | 8,122 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS | |||||||
| 023 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 496 | 496 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS | |||||||
| 046 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS | 6,905 | 6,905 | ||||
| 047 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT—TJS CYBER | 1,458 | 1,458 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | |||||||
| 028 | THAAD | 425,863 | 425,863 | ||||
| 029 | GROUND BASED MIDCOURSE | 9,471 | 9,471 | ||||
| 031 | AEGIS BMD | 600,773 | 600,773 | ||||
| 032 | AEGIS BMD | 96,995 | 96,995 | ||||
| 033 | BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS | 10,046 | 10,046 | ||||
| 034 | ARROW 3 UPPER TIER SYSTEMS | 55,000 | 55,000 | ||||
| 035 | SHORT RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE (SRBMD) | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| 036 | AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III | 25,659 | 25,659 | ||||
| 037 | IRON DOME | 95,000 | 95,000 | ||||
| 038 | AEGIS BMD HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | 124,986 | 124,986 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA | |||||||
| 003 | PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION | 5,030 | 5,030 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | |||||||
| 025 | VEHICLES | 211 | 211 | ||||
| 026 | OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 11,521 | 11,521 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA | |||||||
| 021 | AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS | 1,320 | 1,320 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA | |||||||
| 002 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 2,432 | 2,432 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT | |||||||
| 020 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 10,961 | 10,961 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 049A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 589,366 | 589,366 | ||||
| AVIATION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 053 | ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT | 172,020 | 172,020 | ||||
| 054 | UNMANNED ISR | 15,208 | 15,208 | ||||
| 055 | NON-STANDARD AVIATION | 32,310 | 32,310 | ||||
| 056 | U–28 | 10,898 | 10,898 | ||||
| 057 | MH–47 CHINOOK | 173,812 | 170,312 | ||||
| Excess growth | [–3,500] | ||||||
| 058 | CV–22 MODIFICATION | 17,256 | 17,256 | ||||
| 059 | MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE | 5,338 | 5,338 | ||||
| 060 | PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE | 232,930 | 232,930 | ||||
| 061 | AC/MC–130J | 173,419 | 153,119 | ||||
| Realignment for RFCM | [–8,500] | ||||||
| Realignment to Future Vertical Lift | [–8,800] | ||||||
| RFCM excess to need | [–3,000] | ||||||
| 062 | C–130 MODIFICATIONS | 15,582 | 15,582 | ||||
| SHIPBUILDING | |||||||
| 063 | UNDERWATER SYSTEMS | 58,991 | 58,991 | ||||
| AMMUNITION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 064 | ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M | 279,992 | 279,992 | ||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 065 | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | 100,641 | 100,641 | ||||
| 066 | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 12,522 | 12,522 | ||||
| 067 | OTHER ITEMS <$5M | 103,910 | 103,910 | ||||
| 068 | COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS | 33,088 | 33,088 | ||||
| 069 | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 63,467 | 63,467 | ||||
| 070 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 77,832 | 77,832 | ||||
| 071 | WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M | 298,480 | 298,480 | ||||
| 072 | COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS | 19,702 | 19,702 | ||||
| 073 | GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES | 4,787 | 4,787 | ||||
| 074 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 8,175 | 8,175 | ||||
| 075 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 282,532 | 282,532 | ||||
| CBDP | |||||||
| 076 | CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS | 162,406 | 162,406 | ||||
| 077 | CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION | 188,188 | 188,188 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 5,114,416 | 5,085,616 | |||||
| JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | |||||||
| JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | |||||||
| 001 | JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | 99,200 | 0 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–99,200] | ||||||
| TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | 99,200 | 0 | |||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 132,343,701 | 130,592,919 | |||||
| SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| FIXED WING | |||||||
| 003 | MQ–1 UAV | 54,000 | 54,000 | ||||
| ROTARY | |||||||
| 015 | CH–47 HELICOPTER | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 021 | MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) | 80,260 | 80,260 | ||||
| 024 | GRCS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 750 | 750 | ||||
| 026 | EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 22,180 | 22,180 | ||||
| 027 | UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS | 8,362 | 8,362 | ||||
| 029 | NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN | 10 | 10 | ||||
| 031 | DEGRADED VISUAL ENVIRONMENT | 49,450 | 0 | ||||
| Early to need | [–49,450] | ||||||
| GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS | |||||||
| 037 | CMWS | 130,219 | 130,219 | ||||
| 038 | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 9,310 | 9,310 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 045 | LAUNCHER GUIDED MISSILE: LONGBOW HELLFIRE XM2 | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 381,541 | 332,091 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 002 | M-SHORAD—PROCUREMENT | 158,300 | 158,300 | ||||
| 003 | MSE MISSILE | 37,938 | 37,938 | ||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 006 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 236,265 | 236,265 | ||||
| ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS | |||||||
| 008 | JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY | 4,389 | 4,389 | ||||
| 011 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 431,596 | 431,596 | ||||
| 014 | ARMY TACTICAL MSL SYS (ATACMS)—SYS SUM | 130,770 | 130,770 | ||||
| 015 | LETHAL MINIATURE AERIAL MISSILE SYSTEM (LMAMS | 83,300 | 83,300 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 019 | STINGER MODS | 7,500 | 7,500 | ||||
| 022 | MLRS MODS | 348,000 | 325,000 | ||||
| Excess to need | [–23,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 1,438,058 | 1,415,058 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | ARMORED MULTI PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) | 221,638 | 221,638 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 003 | STRYKER (MOD) | 4,100 | 4,100 | ||||
| 008 | IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) | 80,146 | 80,146 | ||||
| 013 | M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) | 13,100 | 13,100 | ||||
| WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 015 | M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN (7.62MM) | 900 | 900 | ||||
| 016 | MULTI-ROLE ANTI-ARMOR ANTI-PERSONNEL WEAPON S | 2,400 | 2,400 | ||||
| 019 | MORTAR SYSTEMS | 18,941 | 18,941 | ||||
| 020 | XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) | 526 | 526 | ||||
| 023 | CARBINE | 1,183 | 1,183 | ||||
| 025 | COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION | 4,182 | 4,182 | ||||
| 026 | HANDGUN | 248 | 248 | ||||
| MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH | |||||||
| 031 | M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS | 6,090 | 6,090 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | 353,454 | 353,454 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES | 567 | 567 | ||||
| 002 | CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES | 40 | 40 | ||||
| 003 | CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES | 17 | 17 | ||||
| 004 | CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES | 189 | 189 | ||||
| 007 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 24,900 | 24,900 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 015 | PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 | 36,052 | 36,052 | ||||
| 016 | ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL | 7,271 | 7,271 | ||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 018 | SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 176 | 176 | ||||
| 019 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 79,459 | 79,459 | ||||
| MISCELLANEOUS | |||||||
| 027 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) | 11 | 11 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 148,682 | 148,682 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 010 | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) | 26,917 | 26,917 | ||||
| 011 | PLS ESP | 16,941 | 16,941 | ||||
| 012 | HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV | 62,734 | 62,734 | ||||
| 014 | TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| 015 | MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP | 28,000 | 28,000 | ||||
| COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 022 | TACTICAL NETWORK TECHNOLOGY MOD IN SVC | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||||
| COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 029 | TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS | 6,930 | 6,930 | ||||
| 031 | ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING | 11,778 | 11,778 | ||||
| 032 | SMART-T (SPACE) | 825 | 825 | ||||
| COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 040 | RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) | 350 | 350 | ||||
| 047 | COTS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT | 20,400 | 20,400 | ||||
| 048 | FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE | 1,231 | 1,231 | ||||
| COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM | |||||||
| 051 | CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE (MIP) | 6,200 | 6,200 | ||||
| COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 059 | BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS | 20,482 | 15,482 | ||||
| Insufficient budget justification | [–5,000] | ||||||
| COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 060 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 55,800 | 50,800 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 063 | INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM | 75,820 | 75,820 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) | |||||||
| 068 | DCGS-A (MIP) | 38,613 | 38,613 | ||||
| 070 | TROJAN (MIP) | 1,337 | 1,337 | ||||
| 071 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) | 2,051 | 2,051 | ||||
| 075 | BIOMETRIC TACTICAL COLLECTION DEVICES (MIP) | 1,800 | 1,800 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) | |||||||
| 082 | FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAP. (MIP) | 71,493 | 31,493 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–40,000] | ||||||
| 083 | COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES | 6,917 | 6,917 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) | |||||||
| 085 | SENTINEL MODS | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| 086 | NIGHT VISION DEVICES | 3,676 | 3,676 | ||||
| 094 | JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) | 25,568 | 25,568 | ||||
| 097 | COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 | 570 | 570 | ||||
| 098 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM | 15,975 | 15,975 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 103 | AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS | 14,331 | 14,331 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION | |||||||
| 112 | ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION | 6,014 | 6,014 | ||||
| 113 | AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP | 32,700 | 32,700 | ||||
| CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 124 | FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) | 25,480 | 25,480 | ||||
| 125 | BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) | 47,110 | 47,110 | ||||
| 126 | CBRN DEFENSE | 18,711 | 18,711 | ||||
| BRIDGING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 128 | TACTICAL BRIDGING | 4,884 | 4,884 | ||||
| ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 133 | GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) | 4,500 | 4,500 | ||||
| 135 | HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) | 34,253 | 34,253 | ||||
| 136 | ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) | 3,300 | 3,300 | ||||
| 140 | RENDER SAFE SETS KITS OUTFITS | 84,000 | 84,000 | ||||
| COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 143 | HEATERS AND ECU'S | 8 | 8 | ||||
| 145 | PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) | 5,101 | 5,101 | ||||
| 146 | GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM | 1,760 | 1,760 | ||||
| 148 | FORCE PROVIDER | 56,400 | 56,400 | ||||
| 150 | CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM | 2,040 | 2,040 | ||||
| PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 154 | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER | 13,986 | 13,986 | ||||
| MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 155 | COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL | 2,735 | 2,735 | ||||
| CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 159 | SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING | 4,669 | 4,669 | ||||
| 160 | LOADERS | 380 | 380 | ||||
| 162 | TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED | 8,225 | 8,225 | ||||
| 164 | HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||
| 166 | CONST EQUIP ESP | 3,870 | 3,870 | ||||
| 167 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) | 350 | 350 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 171 | GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP | 2,436 | 2,436 | ||||
| MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 173 | FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS | 5,152 | 5,152 | ||||
| TRAINING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 175 | TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM | 2,106 | 2,106 | ||||
| TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) | |||||||
| 181 | INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) | 1,395 | 1,395 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 184 | RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 24,122 | 24,122 | ||||
| 185 | PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) | 10,016 | 10,016 | ||||
| 187 | MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) | 33,354 | 33,354 | ||||
| 189 | BUILDING, PRE-FAB, RELOCATABLE | 62,654 | 62,654 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 1,131,450 | 1,081,450 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 026 | STUASL0 UAV | 7,921 | 7,921 | ||||
| 027 | MQ–9A REAPER | 77,000 | 0 | ||||
| Unjustified OCO request | [–77,000] | ||||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 036 | EP–3 SERIES | 5,488 | 5,488 | ||||
| 046 | SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT | 3,498 | 3,498 | ||||
| 051 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 3,406 | 3,406 | ||||
| 053 | COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM | 3,274 | 3,274 | ||||
| 062 | QRC | 18,458 | 18,458 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 119,045 | 42,045 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 011 | JOINT AIR GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 90,966 | 90,966 | ||||
| 015 | AERIAL TARGETS | 6,500 | 6,500 | ||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 97,466 | 97,466 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 26,978 | 26,978 | ||||
| 002 | JDAM | 12,263 | 12,263 | ||||
| 003 | AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 45,020 | 45,020 | ||||
| 004 | MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION | 33,577 | 33,577 | ||||
| 005 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 11,903 | 11,903 | ||||
| 006 | CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES | 15,081 | 15,081 | ||||
| 007 | AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES | 16,911 | 16,911 | ||||
| 011 | OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION | 3,262 | 3,262 | ||||
| 012 | SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO | 1,010 | 1,010 | ||||
| 013 | PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION | 537 | 537 | ||||
| MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 016 | MORTARS | 1,930 | 1,930 | ||||
| 017 | DIRECT SUPPORT MUNITIONS | 1,172 | 1,172 | ||||
| 018 | INFANTRY WEAPONS AMMUNITION | 2,158 | 2,158 | ||||
| 019 | COMBAT SUPPORT MUNITIONS | 965 | 965 | ||||
| 021 | ARTILLERY MUNITIONS | 32,047 | 32,047 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 204,814 | 204,814 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 020 | UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS | 5,800 | 5,800 | ||||
| ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 042 | FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 310,503 | 310,503 | ||||
| SONOBUOYS | |||||||
| 085 | SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES | 2,910 | 2,910 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 088 | AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 13,420 | 13,420 | ||||
| 094 | AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 500 | 500 | ||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 103 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 15,307 | 15,307 | ||||
| CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 108 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 173 | 173 | ||||
| 109 | GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS | 408 | 408 | ||||
| 111 | FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 785 | 785 | ||||
| SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 117 | SUPPLY EQUIPMENT | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 118 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 510 | 510 | ||||
| COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 122 | COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 2,800 | 2,800 | ||||
| 123 | MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,794 | 1,794 | ||||
| 126 | OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,090 | 1,090 | ||||
| 128 | ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 200 | 200 | ||||
| 129 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 1,300 | 1,300 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 357,600 | 357,600 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| GUIDED MISSILES | |||||||
| 012 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 16,919 | 16,919 | ||||
| ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 045 | EOD SYSTEMS | 3,670 | 3,670 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 20,589 | 20,589 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 017 | MQ–9 | 172,240 | 172,240 | ||||
| 018 | RQ–20B PUMA | 12,150 | 12,150 | ||||
| STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 022 | LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES | 53,335 | 53,335 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 067 | MQ–9 UAS PAYLOADS | 19,800 | 19,800 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 069 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 44,560 | 44,560 | ||||
| COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 072 | AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP | 7,025 | 7,025 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 309,110 | 309,110 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 004 | JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE | 20,900 | 20,900 | ||||
| 008 | PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE | 180,771 | 180,771 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 201,671 | 201,671 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 001 | ROCKETS | 84,960 | 84,960 | ||||
| CARTRIDGES | |||||||
| 002 | CARTRIDGES | 52,642 | 52,642 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 004 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 545,309 | 545,309 | ||||
| FLARES | |||||||
| 015 | FLARES | 93,272 | 93,272 | ||||
| FUZES | |||||||
| 016 | FUZES | 157,155 | 157,155 | ||||
| SMALL ARMS | |||||||
| 017 | SMALL ARMS | 6,095 | 6,095 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 939,433 | 939,433 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 1,276 | 1,276 | ||||
| CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | |||||||
| 004 | CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | 9,702 | 9,702 | ||||
| SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 005 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 40,999 | 40,999 | ||||
| 007 | SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | 52,502 | 52,502 | ||||
| FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 008 | FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES | 16,652 | 16,652 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 009 | MATERIALS HANDLING VEHICLES | 2,944 | 2,944 | ||||
| BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 010 | RUNWAY SNOW REMOV AND CLEANING EQU | 3,753 | 3,753 | ||||
| 011 | BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT VEHICLES | 11,837 | 11,837 | ||||
| SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS | |||||||
| 027 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 031 | AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM | 106,919 | 106,919 | ||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BASE | |||||||
| 048 | TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT | 306 | 306 | ||||
| 052 | BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE | 4,300 | 4,300 | ||||
| PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP | |||||||
| 054 | PERSONAL SAFETY AND RESCUE EQUIPMENT | 22,200 | 22,200 | ||||
| BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 059 | MOBILITY EQUIPMENT | 26,535 | 26,535 | ||||
| 060 | FUELS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FSE) | 4,040 | 4,040 | ||||
| 061 | BASE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 20,067 | 20,067 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 066A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,209,066 | 3,209,066 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 3,538,098 | 3,538,098 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 009 | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 3,800 | 3,800 | ||||
| 012 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | |||||||
| 027 | COUNTER IED & IMPROVISED THREAT TECHNOLOGIES | 4,590 | 4,590 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 049A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 51,380 | 51,380 | ||||
| AVIATION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 050 | MANNED ISR | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 051 | MC–12 | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 052 | MH–60 BLACKHAWK | 28,100 | 28,100 | ||||
| 054 | UNMANNED ISR | 8,207 | 8,207 | ||||
| 056 | U–28 | 31,500 | 31,500 | ||||
| 057 | MH–47 CHINOOK | 37,500 | 34,500 | ||||
| Excess growth | [–3,000] | ||||||
| 059 | MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE | 1,900 | 1,900 | ||||
| AMMUNITION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 064 | ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M | 138,252 | 138,252 | ||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 065 | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | 16,500 | 16,500 | ||||
| 067 | OTHER ITEMS <$5M | 28 | 28 | ||||
| 070 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 2,990 | 2,990 | ||||
| 071 | WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M | 37,512 | 37,512 | ||||
| 072 | COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||
| 074 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 7,594 | 7,594 | ||||
| 075 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 45,194 | 45,194 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 447,047 | 444,047 | |||||
| NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| Program increase | [415,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT | 415,000 | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 9,688,058 | 9,900,608 | |||||
| SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 002 | 0601102A | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 297,976 | 297,976 | |
| 003 | 0601103A | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 65,858 | 65,858 | |
| 004 | 0601104A | UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS | 86,164 | 98,164 | |
| Program increase | [7,000] | ||||
| Program increase—military medical innovation | [5,000] | ||||
| 005 | 0601121A | CYBER COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ALLIANCE | 4,982 | 4,982 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 454,980 | 466,980 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 010 | 0602141A | LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY | 26,961 | 26,961 | |
| 011 | 0602142A | ARMY APPLIED RESEARCH | 25,319 | 25,319 | |
| 012 | 0602143A | SOLDIER LETHALITY TECHNOLOGY | 115,274 | 125,274 | |
| Expeditionary mobile base camp technology | [5,000] | ||||
| HEROES program | [5,000] | ||||
| 013 | 0602144A | GROUND TECHNOLOGY | 35,199 | 45,199 | |
| High performance polymers research | [5,000] | ||||
| Manufacturing research technology | [5,000] | ||||
| 014 | 0602145A | NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY | 219,047 | 225,047 | |
| Structural thermoplastics | [6,000] | ||||
| 015 | 0602146A | NETWORK C3I TECHNOLOGY | 114,516 | 120,016 | |
| Assured PNT lab | [3,000] | ||||
| Next generation SAR small sat | [2,500] | ||||
| 016 | 0602147A | LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES TECHNOLOGY | 74,327 | 79,327 | |
| NextGen propulsion cycle artillery range extension | [5,000] | ||||
| 017 | 0602148A | FUTURE VERTICLE LIFT TECHNOLOGY | 93,601 | 96,601 | |
| Program increase | [3,000] | ||||
| 018 | 0602150A | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY | 50,771 | 50,771 | |
| 020 | 0602213A | C3I APPLIED CYBER | 18,947 | 18,947 | |
| 023 | 0602307A | ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 5,000 | ||
| Directed energy test range workloads | [5,000] | ||||
| 037 | 0602784A | MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY | 5,000 | ||
| Cellulose nanocomposites research | [5,000] | ||||
| 038 | 0602785A | MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY | 20,873 | 20,873 | |
| 040 | 0602787A | MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 99,155 | 102,155 | |
| Program increase | [3,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 893,990 | 946,490 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 041 | 0603001A | WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 5,000 | ||
| Expeditionary maneuver support technologies | [5,000] | ||||
| 042 | 0603002A | MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 42,030 | 42,030 | |
| 047 | 0603007A | MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 11,038 | 11,038 | |
| 050 | 0603117A | ARMY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 63,338 | 63,338 | |
| 051 | 0603118A | SOLDIER LETHALITY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 118,468 | 128,468 | |
| Microlattic technology for combat helmet improvements | [5,000] | ||||
| Thermal mitigation technologies | [5,000] | ||||
| 052 | 0603119A | GROUND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 12,593 | 17,593 | |
| Ground advanced technology for cold regions | [5,000] | ||||
| 059 | 0603457A | C3I CYBER ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 13,769 | 13,769 | |
| 060 | 0603461A | HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 184,755 | 224,755 | |
| Program increase | [40,000] | ||||
| 061 | 0603462A | NEXT GENERATION COMBAT VEHICLE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 160,035 | 170,035 | |
| Program increase—hydrogen fuel cells | [10,000] | ||||
| 062 | 0603463A | NETWORK C3I ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 106,899 | 103,899 | |
| Underexecution | [–3,000] | ||||
| 063 | 0603464A | LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 174,386 | 179,386 | |
| Program increase missile demonstrations | [5,000] | ||||
| 064 | 0603465A | FUTURE VERTICAL LIFT ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 151,640 | 146,640 | |
| Excess to need | [–5,000] | ||||
| 065 | 0603466A | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 60,613 | 60,613 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 1,099,564 | 1,166,564 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 073 | 0603305A | ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 10,987 | 30,987 | |
| Conventional mission capabilities | [10,000] | ||||
| System lab integration improvements | [10,000] | ||||
| 074 | 0603327A | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 15,148 | 15,148 | |
| 075 | 0603619A | LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV | 92,915 | 92,915 | |
| 077 | 0603639A | TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION | 82,146 | 82,146 | |
| 078 | 0603645A | ARMORED SYSTEM MODERNIZATION—ADV DEV | 157,656 | 157,656 | |
| 079 | 0603747A | SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY | 6,514 | 6,514 | |
| 080 | 0603766A | TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV | 34,890 | 37,890 | |
| Mobile ground terminal | [3,000] | ||||
| 081 | 0603774A | NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 251,011 | 206,011 | |
| IVAS insufficient justification | [–45,000] | ||||
| 082 | 0603779A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL | 15,132 | 15,132 | |
| 083 | 0603790A | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 5,406 | 5,406 | |
| 084 | 0603801A | AVIATION—ADV DEV | 459,290 | 443,340 | |
| Early to need | [–15,950] | ||||
| 085 | 0603804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV | 6,254 | 6,254 | |
| 086 | 0603807A | MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV | 31,175 | 31,175 | |
| 087 | 0603827A | SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 22,113 | 22,113 | |
| 088 | 0604017A | ROBOTICS DEVELOPMENT | 115,222 | 115,222 | |
| 090 | 0604021A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY MATURATION (MIP) | 18,043 | 18,043 | |
| 091 | 0604100A | ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES | 10,023 | 10,023 | |
| 092 | 0604113A | FUTURE TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (FTUAS) | 40,745 | 40,745 | |
| 093 | 0604114A | LOWER TIER AIR MISSILE DEFENSE (LTAMD) SENSOR | 427,772 | 427,772 | |
| 094 | 0604115A | TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES | 196,676 | 161,676 | |
| Insufficient schedule detail | [–35,000] | ||||
| 095 | 0604117A | MANEUVER—SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE (M-SHORAD) | 33,100 | 29,100 | |
| Excess testing cost | [–4,000] | ||||
| 097 | 0604119A | ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING | 115,116 | 105,116 | |
| Early to need | [–10,000] | ||||
| 099 | 0604121A | SYNTHETIC TRAINING ENVIRONMENT REFINEMENT & PROTOTYPING | 136,761 | 111,761 | |
| Early to need (IVAS) | [–25,000] | ||||
| 100 | 0604182A | HYPERSONICS | 228,000 | 259,000 | |
| Transfer from RDTE Defense-Wide, line 124 | [31,000] | ||||
| 102 | 0604403A | FUTURE INTERCEPTOR | 8,000 | 8,000 | |
| 103 | 0604541A | UNIFIED NETWORK TRANSPORT | 39,600 | 30,600 | |
| Early to need | [–9,000] | ||||
| 104 | 0604644A | MOBILE MEDIUM RANGE MISSILE | 20,000 | 0 | |
| Program decrease | [–20,000] | ||||
| 106 | 0305251A | CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT | 52,102 | 52,102 | |
| 107 | 1206120A | ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) | 192,562 | 150,062 | |
| Project cancellation | [–42,500] | ||||
| 108 | 1206308A | ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 104,996 | 54,996 | |
| Program delay | [–50,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 2,929,355 | 2,726,905 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 109 | 0604201A | AIRCRAFT AVIONICS | 29,164 | 29,164 | |
| 110 | 0604270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 70,539 | 70,539 | |
| 113 | 0604601A | INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS | 106,121 | 125,321 | |
| Army unfunded priority—NGSW program increase | [19,200] | ||||
| 114 | 0604604A | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES | 2,152 | 2,152 | |
| 115 | 0604611A | JAVELIN | 17,897 | 16,397 | |
| Qualification testing early to need | [–1,500] | ||||
| 116 | 0604622A | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES | 16,745 | 16,745 | |
| 117 | 0604633A | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 6,989 | 6,989 | |
| 118 | 0604642A | LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES | 10,465 | 10,465 | |
| 119 | 0604645A | ARMORED SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION (ASM)—ENG DEV | 310,152 | 295,152 | |
| Program delay | [–15,000] | ||||
| 120 | 0604710A | NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 181,732 | 166,732 | |
| Insufficient justification (IVAS) | [–15,000] | ||||
| 121 | 0604713A | COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT | 2,393 | 2,393 | |
| 122 | 0604715A | NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV | 27,412 | 27,412 | |
| 123 | 0604741A | AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV | 43,502 | 38,502 | |
| Historical underexecution | [–5,000] | ||||
| 124 | 0604742A | CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 11,636 | 11,636 | |
| 125 | 0604746A | AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT | 10,915 | 10,915 | |
| 126 | 0604760A | DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV | 7,801 | 7,801 | |
| 127 | 0604768A | BRILLIANT ANTI-ARMOR SUBMUNITION (BAT) | 25,000 | 20,000 | |
| PFAL excess | [–5,000] | ||||
| 128 | 0604780A | COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE | 9,241 | 9,241 | |
| 129 | 0604798A | BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION | 42,634 | 38,634 | |
| RCO support excess | [–4,000] | ||||
| 130 | 0604802A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV | 181,023 | 181,023 | |
| 131 | 0604804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV | 103,226 | 103,226 | |
| 132 | 0604805A | COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 12,595 | 12,595 | |
| 133 | 0604807A | MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV | 48,264 | 48,264 | |
| 134 | 0604808A | LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV | 39,208 | 39,208 | |
| 135 | 0604818A | ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE | 140,637 | 138,137 | |
| CPI2 testing previously funded | [–2,500] | ||||
| 136 | 0604820A | RADAR DEVELOPMENT | 105,243 | 105,243 | |
| 137 | 0604822A | GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) | 46,683 | 41,683 | |
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||||
| 138 | 0604823A | FIREFINDER | 17,294 | 17,294 | |
| 139 | 0604827A | SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL | 5,803 | 4,803 | |
| Historical underexecution | [–1,000] | ||||
| 140 | 0604852A | SUITE OF SURVIVABILITY ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMS—EMD | 98,698 | 128,698 | |
| Program increase for vehicle protection evaluation | [30,000] | ||||
| 141 | 0604854A | ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD | 15,832 | 10,832 | |
| Mobile howitzer testing early to need | [–5,000] | ||||
| 142 | 0605013A | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 126,537 | 126,537 | |
| 143 | 0605018A | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) | 142,773 | 99,773 | |
| Program decrease | [–43,000] | ||||
| 144 | 0605028A | ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) | 96,730 | 96,730 | |
| 145 | 0605029A | INTEGRATED GROUND SECURITY SURVEILLANCE RESPONSE CAPABILITY (IGSSR-C) | 6,699 | 6,699 | |
| 146 | 0605030A | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) | 15,882 | 15,882 | |
| 147 | 0605031A | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN) | 40,808 | 40,808 | |
| 149 | 0605033A | GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—EXPEDITIONARY (GBOSS-E) | 3,847 | 3,847 | |
| 150 | 0605034A | TACTICAL SECURITY SYSTEM (TSS) | 6,928 | 6,928 | |
| 151 | 0605035A | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 34,488 | 34,488 | |
| 152 | 0605036A | COMBATING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (CWMD) | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| 154 | 0605038A | NUCLEAR BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE (NBCRV) SENSOR SUITE | 6,054 | 6,054 | |
| 155 | 0605041A | DEFENSIVE CYBER TOOL DEVELOPMENT | 62,262 | 62,262 | |
| 156 | 0605042A | TACTICAL NETWORK RADIO SYSTEMS (LOW-TIER) | 35,654 | 28,654 | |
| Excess growth | [–7,000] | ||||
| 157 | 0605047A | CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM | 19,682 | 19,682 | |
| 158 | 0605049A | MISSILE WARNING SYSTEM MODERNIZATION (MWSM) | 1,539 | 1,539 | |
| 159 | 0605051A | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 64,557 | 64,557 | |
| 160 | 0605052A | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2—BLOCK 1 | 243,228 | 243,228 | |
| 161 | 0605053A | GROUND ROBOTICS | 41,308 | 41,308 | |
| 162 | 0605054A | EMERGING TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVES | 45,896 | 41,896 | |
| Testing and evaluation excess growth | [–4,000] | ||||
| 163 | 0605203A | ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 164,883 | 164,883 | |
| 165 | 0605450A | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 9,500 | 9,500 | |
| 166 | 0605457A | ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) | 208,938 | 203,938 | |
| Testing and evaluation excess growth | [–5,000] | ||||
| 167 | 0605625A | MANNED GROUND VEHICLE | 378,400 | 378,400 | |
| 168 | 0605766A | NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) | 7,835 | 9,835 | |
| Mobile ground terminal | [2,000] | ||||
| 169 | 0605812A | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH | 2,732 | 7,232 | |
| Army requested realignment from OPA 7 | [4,500] | ||||
| 170 | 0605830A | AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,664 | 1,664 | |
| 172 | 0303032A | TROJAN—RH12 | 3,936 | 3,936 | |
| 174 | 0304270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 19,675 | 19,675 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 3,549,431 | 3,487,131 | |||
| RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 176 | 0604256A | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 14,117 | 14,117 | |
| 177 | 0604258A | TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 8,327 | 8,327 | |
| 178 | 0604759A | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 136,565 | 136,565 | |
| 179 | 0605103A | RAND ARROYO CENTER | 13,113 | 13,113 | |
| 180 | 0605301A | ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL | 238,691 | 226,691 | |
| Program decrease | [–12,000] | ||||
| 181 | 0605326A | CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM | 42,922 | 42,922 | |
| 183 | 0605601A | ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES | 334,468 | 334,468 | |
| 184 | 0605602A | ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS | 46,974 | 51,974 | |
| Program increase—space and missile cybersecurity | [5,000] | ||||
| 185 | 0605604A | SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS | 35,075 | 35,075 | |
| 186 | 0605606A | AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION | 3,461 | 3,461 | |
| 187 | 0605702A | METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES | 6,233 | 6,233 | |
| 188 | 0605706A | MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS | 21,342 | 21,342 | |
| 189 | 0605709A | EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS | 11,168 | 11,168 | |
| 190 | 0605712A | SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING | 52,723 | 52,723 | |
| 191 | 0605716A | ARMY EVALUATION CENTER | 60,815 | 60,815 | |
| 192 | 0605718A | ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG | 2,527 | 2,527 | |
| 193 | 0605801A | PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES | 58,175 | 61,175 | |
| Program increase for transition costs | [3,000] | ||||
| 194 | 0605803A | TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES | 25,060 | 25,060 | |
| 195 | 0605805A | MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY | 44,458 | 49,458 | |
| Advanced lightweight small arms and medium caliber ammunition | [5,000] | ||||
| 196 | 0605857A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT | 4,681 | 4,681 | |
| 197 | 0605898A | ARMY DIRECT REPORT HEADQUARTERS—R&D - MHA | 53,820 | 53,820 | |
| 198 | 0606001A | MILITARY GROUND-BASED CREW TECHNOLOGY | 4,291 | 4,291 | |
| 199 | 0606002A | RONALD REAGAN BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST SITE | 62,069 | 62,069 | |
| 200 | 0606003A | COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION | 1,050 | 1,050 | |
| 201 | 0606942A | ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS CYBER VULNERABILITIES | 4,500 | 4,500 | |
| SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,286,625 | 1,287,625 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 204 | 0603778A | MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 22,877 | 17,877 | |
| HIMARS excess growth | [–5,000] | ||||
| 206 | 0605024A | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 8,491 | 8,491 | |
| 207 | 0607131A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 15,645 | 15,645 | |
| 209 | 0607134A | LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES (LRPF) | 164,182 | 164,182 | |
| 211 | 0607136A | BLACKHAWK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 13,039 | 13,039 | |
| 212 | 0607137A | CHINOOK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 174,371 | 174,371 | |
| 213 | 0607138A | FIXED WING PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 4,545 | 4,545 | |
| 214 | 0607139A | IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM | 206,434 | 206,434 | |
| 216 | 0607142A | AVIATION ROCKET SYSTEM PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT | 24,221 | 14,221 | |
| Integrated munitions launcher early to need | [–10,000] | ||||
| 217 | 0607143A | UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM UNIVERSAL PRODUCTS | 32,016 | 32,016 | |
| 218 | 0607145A | APACHE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT | 5,448 | 448 | |
| Unjustified request | [–5,000] | ||||
| 219 | 0607312A | ARMY OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 49,526 | 49,526 | |
| 220 | 0607665A | FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS | 1,702 | 1,702 | |
| 221 | 0607865A | PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT | 96,430 | 96,430 | |
| 222 | 0203728A | JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS) | 47,398 | 47,398 | |
| 223 | 0203735A | COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 334,463 | 324,463 | |
| Early to need | [–10,000] | ||||
| 225 | 0203743A | 155MM SELF-PROPELLED HOWITZER IMPROVEMENTS | 214,246 | 214,246 | |
| 226 | 0203744A | AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 16,486 | 11,986 | |
| Excess to need | [–4,500] | ||||
| 227 | 0203752A | AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 144 | 144 | |
| 228 | 0203758A | DIGITIZATION | 5,270 | 5,270 | |
| 229 | 0203801A | MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 1,287 | 1,287 | |
| 234 | 0205412A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV | 732 | 732 | |
| 235 | 0205456A | LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM | 107,746 | 107,746 | |
| 236 | 0205778A | GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS) | 138,594 | 128,594 | |
| Testing excess to need | [–10,000] | ||||
| 238 | 0303028A | SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 13,845 | 13,845 | |
| 239 | 0303140A | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 29,185 | 29,185 | |
| 240 | 0303141A | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 68,976 | 58,976 | |
| Program decrease | [–10,000] | ||||
| 241 | 0303150A | WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 2,073 | 2,073 | |
| 245 | 0305179A | INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) | 459 | 459 | |
| 246 | 0305204A | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 5,097 | 5,097 | |
| 247 | 0305206A | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 11,177 | 11,177 | |
| 248 | 0305208A | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 38,121 | 38,121 | |
| 250 | 0305232A | RQ–11 UAV | 3,218 | 3,218 | |
| 251 | 0305233A | RQ–7 UAV | 7,817 | 7,817 | |
| 252 | 0307665A | BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE | 2,000 | 2,000 | |
| 253 | 0708045A | END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES | 59,848 | 64,848 | |
| Program increase—additive manufacturing technology insertion | [5,000] | ||||
| 254 | 1203142A | SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) | 34,169 | 34,169 | |
| 255 | 1208053A | JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM | 10,275 | 10,275 | |
| 255A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 7,273 | 7,273 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 1,978,826 | 1,929,326 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 12,192,771 | 12,011,021 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 001 | 0601103N | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 116,850 | 126,850 | |
| Advanced radar research | [5,000] | ||||
| Defense University research initiatives | [5,000] | ||||
| 002 | 0601152N | IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH | 19,121 | 19,121 | |
| 003 | 0601153N | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 470,007 | 470,007 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 605,978 | 615,978 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 004 | 0602114N | POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 18,546 | 25,546 | |
| Hypersonic testing facilities | [7,000] | ||||
| 005 | 0602123N | FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 119,517 | 162,517 | |
| Autonomous vehicle collaboration across maritime domains | [10,000] | ||||
| Cyber-physical research | [8,000] | ||||
| Energy resilience | [5,000] | ||||
| Hybrid composite struct. res. enhanced mobility | [5,000] | ||||
| Navy power and energy systems technology | [5,000] | ||||
| Program increase—direct air capture and blue carbon research | [10,000] | ||||
| 006 | 0602131M | MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY | 56,604 | 61,604 | |
| Interdisciplinary expeditionary cybersecurity research | [5,000] | ||||
| 007 | 0602235N | COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH | 49,297 | 49,297 | |
| 008 | 0602236N | WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH | 63,825 | 68,825 | |
| Warfighter safety and performance | [5,000] | ||||
| 009 | 0602271N | ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH | 83,497 | 83,497 | |
| 010 | 0602435N | OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH | 63,894 | 63,894 | |
| 011 | 0602651M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH | 6,346 | 6,346 | |
| 012 | 0602747N | UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH | 57,075 | 77,075 | |
| Academic partnerships for undersea vehicle research | [10,000] | ||||
| Resident autonomous undersea robotics | [10,000] | ||||
| 013 | 0602750N | FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH | 154,755 | 154,755 | |
| 014 | 0602782N | MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH | 36,074 | 36,074 | |
| 015 | 0602792N | INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) APPLIED RESEARCH | 153,062 | 153,062 | |
| 016 | 0602861N | SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT—ONR FIELD ACITIVITIES | 73,961 | 73,961 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 936,453 | 1,016,453 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 017 | 0603123N | FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 35,286 | 35,286 | |
| 018 | 0603271N | ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 9,499 | 9,499 | |
| 019 | 0603640M | USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) | 172,847 | 177,847 | |
| Program increase—modular advanced armed robotic system | [5,000] | ||||
| 020 | 0603651M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 13,307 | 13,307 | |
| 021 | 0603673N | FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 231,907 | 231,907 | |
| 022 | 0603680N | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 60,138 | 80,138 | |
| Program increase | [20,000] | ||||
| 023 | 0603729N | WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 4,849 | 4,849 | |
| 025 | 0603758N | NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS | 67,739 | 67,739 | |
| 026 | 0603782N | MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 13,335 | 13,335 | |
| 027 | 0603801N | INNOVATIVE NAVAL PROTOTYPES (INP) ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 133,303 | 176,303 | |
| Electromagnetic railgun | [20,350] | ||||
| Program increase | [22,650] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 742,210 | 810,210 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 028 | 0603207N | AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS | 32,643 | 32,643 | |
| 029 | 0603216N | AVIATION SURVIVABILITY | 11,919 | 11,919 | |
| 030 | 0603251N | AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS | 1,473 | 1,473 | |
| 031 | 0603254N | ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 7,172 | 7,172 | |
| 032 | 0603261N | TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE | 3,419 | 3,419 | |
| 033 | 0603382N | ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY | 64,694 | 64,694 | |
| 034 | 0603502N | SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES | 507,000 | 312,200 | |
| LUSV Design Contracts early to need | [–29,100] | ||||
| LUSV GFE early to need | [–79,200] | ||||
| LUSV program decrease | [–43,000] | ||||
| MUSV program increase | [43,000] | ||||
| Reduce one LUSV | [–86,500] | ||||
| 035 | 0603506N | SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE | 15,800 | 15,800 | |
| 036 | 0603512N | CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 4,997 | 4,997 | |
| 037 | 0603525N | PILOT FISH | 291,148 | 291,148 | |
| 038 | 0603527N | RETRACT LARCH | 11,980 | 11,980 | |
| 039 | 0603536N | RETRACT JUNIPER | 129,163 | 129,163 | |
| 040 | 0603542N | RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL | 689 | 689 | |
| 041 | 0603553N | SURFACE ASW | 1,137 | 1,137 | |
| 042 | 0603561N | ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 148,756 | 148,756 | |
| 043 | 0603562N | SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS | 11,192 | 11,192 | |
| 044 | 0603563N | SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN | 81,846 | 67,846 | |
| Future surface combatant concept development concurrency | [–24,000] | ||||
| Program increase | [5,000] | ||||
| Program increase—moving target defense | [5,000] | ||||
| 045 | 0603564N | SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES | 69,084 | 59,084 | |
| Program decrease | [–10,000] | ||||
| 046 | 0603570N | ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS | 181,652 | 181,652 | |
| 047 | 0603573N | ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS | 25,408 | 30,408 | |
| Program increase | [5,000] | ||||
| 048 | 0603576N | CHALK EAGLE | 64,877 | 64,877 | |
| 049 | 0603581N | LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) | 9,934 | 9,934 | |
| 050 | 0603582N | COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION | 17,251 | 17,251 | |
| 051 | 0603595N | OHIO REPLACEMENT | 419,051 | 419,051 | |
| 052 | 0603596N | LCS MISSION MODULES | 108,505 | 108,505 | |
| 053 | 0603597N | AUTOMATED TEST AND ANALYSIS | 7,653 | 7,653 | |
| 054 | 0603599N | FRIGATE DEVELOPMENT | 59,007 | 59,007 | |
| 055 | 0603609N | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS | 9,988 | 9,988 | |
| 056 | 0603635M | MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM | 86,464 | 11,464 | |
| Insufficient justification and contract delay | [–75,000] | ||||
| 057 | 0603654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 33,478 | 33,478 | |
| 058 | 0603713N | OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 5,619 | 5,619 | |
| 059 | 0603721N | ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION | 20,564 | 20,564 | |
| 060 | 0603724N | NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM | 26,514 | 49,514 | |
| Battery development and safety enterprise | [13,000] | ||||
| Marine energy systems for sensors and microgrids | [10,000] | ||||
| 061 | 0603725N | FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT | 3,440 | 3,440 | |
| 062 | 0603734N | CHALK CORAL | 346,800 | 346,800 | |
| 063 | 0603739N | NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY | 3,857 | 3,857 | |
| 064 | 0603746N | RETRACT MAPLE | 258,519 | 258,519 | |
| 065 | 0603748N | LINK PLUMERIA | 403,909 | 403,909 | |
| 066 | 0603751N | RETRACT ELM | 63,434 | 63,434 | |
| 067 | 0603764N | LINK EVERGREEN | 184,110 | 184,110 | |
| 068 | 0603790N | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 7,697 | 7,697 | |
| 069 | 0603795N | LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY | 9,086 | 9,086 | |
| 070 | 0603851M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING | 28,466 | 28,466 | |
| 071 | 0603860N | JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL | 51,341 | 51,341 | |
| 072 | 0603925N | DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS | 118,169 | 118,169 | |
| 073 | 0604014N | F/A –18 INFRARED SEARCH AND TRACK (IRST) | 113,456 | 112,456 | |
| Program delay | [–1,000] | ||||
| 074 | 0604027N | DIGITAL WARFARE OFFICE | 50,120 | 50,120 | |
| 075 | 0604028N | SMALL AND MEDIUM UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES | 32,527 | 32,527 | |
| 076 | 0604029N | UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLE CORE TECHNOLOGIES | 54,376 | 54,376 | |
| 077 | 0604030N | RAPID PROTOTYPING, EXPERIMENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION. | 36,197 | 36,197 | |
| 078 | 0604031N | LARGE UNMANNED UNDERSEA VEHICLES | 68,310 | 59,810 | |
| Early to need | [–8,500] | ||||
| 079 | 0604112N | GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80) | 121,310 | 121,310 | |
| 080 | 0604126N | LITTORAL AIRBORNE MCM | 17,248 | 17,248 | |
| 081 | 0604127N | SURFACE MINE COUNTERMEASURES | 18,735 | 18,735 | |
| 082 | 0604272N | TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) | 68,346 | 58,346 | |
| Excess to need | [–10,000] | ||||
| 084 | 0604289M | NEXT GENERATION LOGISTICS | 4,420 | 4,420 | |
| 085 | 0604320M | RAPID TECHNOLOGY CAPABILITY PROTOTYPE | 4,558 | 4,558 | |
| 086 | 0604454N | LX (R) | 12,500 | 12,500 | |
| 087 | 0604536N | ADVANCED UNDERSEA PROTOTYPING | 181,967 | 174,437 | |
| ORCA XLUUV prior year carryover | [–7,530] | ||||
| 088 | 0604636N | COUNTER UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (C-UAS) | 5,500 | 5,500 | |
| 089 | 0604659N | PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM | 718,148 | 638,148 | |
| Excess growth | [–80,000] | ||||
| 090 | 0604707N | SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT | 5,263 | 5,263 | |
| 091 | 0604786N | OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT | 65,419 | 65,419 | |
| 092 | 0303354N | ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP | 9,991 | 9,991 | |
| 093 | 0304240M | ADVANCED TACTICAL UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM | 21,157 | 39,657 | |
| KMAX Large Unmanned Logistics System USMC unfunded priority | [18,500] | ||||
| 095 | 0304270N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP | 609 | 609 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 5,559,062 | 5,204,732 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 096 | 0603208N | TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT | 15,514 | 15,514 | |
| 097 | 0604212N | OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT | 28,835 | 28,835 | |
| 098 | 0604214M | AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV | 27,441 | 27,441 | |
| 100 | 0604215N | STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT | 3,642 | 3,642 | |
| 101 | 0604216N | MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT | 19,196 | 19,196 | |
| 104 | 0604230N | WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 8,601 | 8,601 | |
| 105 | 0604231N | TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM | 77,232 | 77,232 | |
| 106 | 0604234N | ADVANCED HAWKEYE | 232,752 | 232,752 | |
| 107 | 0604245M | H–1 UPGRADES | 65,359 | 64,859 | |
| Support cost growth | [–500] | ||||
| 109 | 0604261N | ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS | 47,013 | 47,013 | |
| 110 | 0604262N | V–22A | 185,105 | 172,105 | |
| Excess to need | [–13,000] | ||||
| 111 | 0604264N | AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 21,172 | 21,172 | |
| 112 | 0604269N | EA–18 | 143,585 | 123,585 | |
| Unjustified cost growth | [–20,000] | ||||
| 113 | 0604270N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 116,811 | 109,651 | |
| Unjustified request | [–7,160] | ||||
| 114 | 0604273M | EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT | 187,436 | 187,436 | |
| 116 | 0604274N | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) | 524,261 | 443,261 | |
| Underexecution | [–81,000] | ||||
| 117 | 0604280N | JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) | 192,345 | 190,845 | |
| Early to need | [–1,500] | ||||
| 118 | 0604282N | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) INCREMENT II | 111,068 | 111,068 | |
| 119 | 0604307N | SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING | 415,625 | 415,625 | |
| 120 | 0604311N | LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 640 | 640 | |
| 121 | 0604329N | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) | 50,096 | 50,096 | |
| 122 | 0604366N | STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS | 232,391 | 232,391 | |
| 123 | 0604373N | AIRBORNE MCM | 10,916 | 10,916 | |
| 124 | 0604378N | NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 33,379 | 33,379 | |
| 125 | 0604501N | ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS | 34,554 | 34,554 | |
| 126 | 0604503N | SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION | 84,663 | 84,663 | |
| 127 | 0604504N | AIR CONTROL | 44,923 | 44,923 | |
| 128 | 0604512N | SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS | 10,632 | 10,632 | |
| 129 | 0604518N | COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION | 16,094 | 16,094 | |
| 130 | 0604522N | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM | 55,349 | 55,349 | |
| 131 | 0604530N | ADVANCED ARRESTING GEAR (AAG) | 123,490 | 123,490 | |
| 132 | 0604558N | NEW DESIGN SSN | 121,010 | 121,010 | |
| 133 | 0604562N | SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM | 62,426 | 62,426 | |
| 134 | 0604567N | SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E | 46,809 | 56,809 | |
| Program increase—DDG–51 advanced degaussing | [10,000] | ||||
| 135 | 0604574N | NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES | 3,692 | 3,692 | |
| 137 | 0604601N | MINE DEVELOPMENT | 28,964 | 28,964 | |
| 138 | 0604610N | LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT | 148,349 | 127,349 | |
| Excess to need | [–21,000] | ||||
| 139 | 0604654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 8,237 | 8,237 | |
| 140 | 0604657M | USMC GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 22,000 | 22,000 | |
| 141 | 0604703N | PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS | 5,500 | 5,500 | |
| 142 | 0604727N | JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS | 18,725 | 16,225 | |
| Excess to need | [–2,500] | ||||
| 143 | 0604755N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) | 192,603 | 192,603 | |
| 144 | 0604756N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) | 137,268 | 137,268 | |
| 145 | 0604757N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) | 97,363 | 97,363 | |
| 146 | 0604761N | INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING | 26,710 | 26,710 | |
| 147 | 0604771N | MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT | 8,181 | 13,181 | |
| Enterotoxigenic escherichia coli research | [5,000] | ||||
| 148 | 0604777N | NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM | 40,755 | 40,755 | |
| 149 | 0604800M | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD | 1,710 | 1,710 | |
| 150 | 0604800N | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD | 1,490 | 1,490 | |
| 153 | 0605013M | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 1,494 | 1,494 | |
| 154 | 0605013N | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 384,162 | 370,662 | |
| Unjustified growth over FY19 projection | [–13,500] | ||||
| 155 | 0605024N | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 4,882 | 4,882 | |
| 156 | 0605212M | CH–53K RDTE | 516,955 | 496,955 | |
| Excess to need | [–20,000] | ||||
| 158 | 0605215N | MISSION PLANNING | 75,886 | 75,886 | |
| 159 | 0605217N | COMMON AVIONICS | 43,187 | 43,187 | |
| 160 | 0605220N | SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC) | 4,909 | 4,909 | |
| 161 | 0605327N | T-AO 205 CLASS | 1,682 | 1,682 | |
| 162 | 0605414N | UNMANNED CARRIER AVIATION (UCA) | 671,258 | 671,258 | |
| 163 | 0605450M | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 18,393 | 12,393 | |
| Schedule delays | [–6,000] | ||||
| 165 | 0605500N | MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) | 21,472 | 21,472 | |
| 166 | 0605504N | MULTI-MISSION MARITIME (MMA) INCREMENT III | 177,234 | 177,234 | |
| 167 | 0605611M | MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 77,322 | 69,121 | |
| Early to need | [–2,201] | ||||
| Excess growth | [–6,000] | ||||
| 168 | 0605813M | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 2,105 | 2,105 | |
| 169 | 0204202N | DDG–1000 | 111,435 | 111,435 | |
| 172 | 0304785N | TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS | 101,339 | 101,339 | |
| 173 | 0306250M | CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 26,406 | 26,406 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 6,332,033 | 6,152,672 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 174 | 0604256N | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 66,678 | 66,678 | |
| 175 | 0604258N | TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 12,027 | 12,027 | |
| 176 | 0604759N | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 85,348 | 85,348 | |
| 178 | 0605152N | STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY | 3,908 | 3,908 | |
| 179 | 0605154N | CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES | 47,669 | 47,669 | |
| 180 | 0605285N | NEXT GENERATION FIGHTER | 20,698 | 20,698 | |
| 182 | 0605804N | TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES | 988 | 988 | |
| 183 | 0605853N | MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 102,401 | 102,401 | |
| 184 | 0605856N | STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT | 3,742 | 3,742 | |
| 186 | 0605863N | RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT | 93,872 | 93,872 | |
| 187 | 0605864N | TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 394,020 | 394,020 | |
| 188 | 0605865N | OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY | 25,145 | 25,145 | |
| 189 | 0605866N | NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT | 15,773 | 15,773 | |
| 190 | 0605867N | SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT | 8,402 | 8,402 | |
| 191 | 0605873M | MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT | 37,265 | 29,265 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–8,000] | ||||
| 192 | 0605898N | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 39,673 | 39,673 | |
| 193 | 0606355N | WARFARE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT | 28,750 | 28,750 | |
| 196 | 0305327N | INSIDER THREAT | 2,645 | 2,645 | |
| 197 | 0902498N | MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS (DEPARTMENTAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES) | 1,460 | 1,460 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 990,464 | 982,464 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 202 | 0604227N | HARPOON MODIFICATIONS | 2,302 | 2,302 | |
| 203 | 0604840M | F–35 C2D2 | 422,881 | 422,881 | |
| 204 | 0604840N | F–35 C2D2 | 383,741 | 383,741 | |
| 205 | 0607658N | COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY (CEC) | 127,924 | 127,924 | |
| 207 | 0101221N | STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT | 157,676 | 157,676 | |
| 208 | 0101224N | SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 43,354 | 43,354 | |
| 209 | 0101226N | SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 6,815 | 6,815 | |
| 210 | 0101402N | NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS | 31,174 | 31,174 | |
| 211 | 0204136N | F/A–18 SQUADRONS | 213,715 | 216,215 | |
| Block III support prior year carryover | [–7,500] | ||||
| Jet noise reduction research | [10,000] | ||||
| 213 | 0204228N | SURFACE SUPPORT | 36,389 | 45,389 | |
| WSN–12 Technology Insertion | [9,000] | ||||
| 214 | 0204229N | TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) | 320,134 | 320,134 | |
| 215 | 0204311N | INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 88,382 | 88,382 | |
| 216 | 0204313N | SHIP-TOWED ARRAY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS | 14,449 | 14,449 | |
| 217 | 0204413N | AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) | 6,931 | 6,931 | |
| 218 | 0204460M | GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) | 23,891 | 23,891 | |
| 219 | 0204571N | CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 129,873 | 129,873 | |
| 221 | 0204575N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT | 82,325 | 62,325 | |
| Prior year carryover | [–20,000] | ||||
| 222 | 0205601N | HARM IMPROVEMENT | 138,431 | 132,431 | |
| AARGM ER test schedule discrepancy | [–6,000] | ||||
| 224 | 0205620N | SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION | 29,572 | 29,572 | |
| 225 | 0205632N | MK–48 ADCAP | 85,973 | 85,973 | |
| 226 | 0205633N | AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS | 125,461 | 125,461 | |
| 227 | 0205675N | OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS | 106,192 | 106,192 | |
| 228 | 0206313M | MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 143,317 | 134,317 | |
| Program delay | [–9,000] | ||||
| 229 | 0206335M | COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S) | 4,489 | 4,489 | |
| 230 | 0206623M | MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS | 51,788 | 51,788 | |
| 231 | 0206624M | MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT | 37,761 | 37,761 | |
| 232 | 0206625M | USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) | 21,458 | 21,458 | |
| 233 | 0206629M | AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE | 5,476 | 5,476 | |
| 234 | 0207161N | TACTICAL AIM MISSILES | 19,488 | 19,488 | |
| 235 | 0207163N | ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) | 39,029 | 34,529 | |
| Prior year carryover | [–4,500] | ||||
| 239 | 0303109N | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) | 34,344 | 34,344 | |
| 240 | 0303138N | CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) | 22,873 | 22,873 | |
| 241 | 0303140N | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 41,853 | 41,853 | |
| 243 | 0305192N | MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES | 8,913 | 8,913 | |
| 244 | 0305204N | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 9,451 | 9,451 | |
| 245 | 0305205N | UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY | 42,315 | 42,315 | |
| 246 | 0305208M | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 22,042 | 22,042 | |
| 248 | 0305220N | MQ–4C TRITON | 11,784 | 11,784 | |
| 249 | 0305231N | MQ–8 UAV | 29,618 | 29,618 | |
| 250 | 0305232M | RQ–11 UAV | 509 | 509 | |
| 251 | 0305234N | SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) | 11,545 | 11,545 | |
| 252 | 0305239M | RQ–21A | 10,914 | 10,914 | |
| 253 | 0305241N | MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT | 70,612 | 70,612 | |
| 254 | 0305242M | UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP) | 3,704 | 3,704 | |
| 255 | 0305421N | RQ–4 MODERNIZATION | 202,346 | 202,346 | |
| 256 | 0308601N | MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT | 7,119 | 7,119 | |
| 257 | 0702207N | DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) | 38,182 | 38,182 | |
| 258 | 0708730N | MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) | 6,779 | 6,779 | |
| 259 | 1203109N | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) | 15,868 | 15,868 | |
| 259A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,613,137 | 1,613,137 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 5,104,299 | 5,076,299 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 20,270,499 | 19,858,808 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 001 | 0601102F | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 356,107 | 356,107 | |
| 002 | 0601103F | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 158,859 | 158,859 | |
| 003 | 0601108F | HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 14,795 | 14,795 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 529,761 | 529,761 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 004 | 0602102F | MATERIALS | 128,851 | 143,851 | |
| Advanced thermal protection systems | [10,000] | ||||
| Program increase—flexible biosensors | [5,000] | ||||
| 005 | 0602201F | AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES | 147,724 | 147,724 | |
| 006 | 0602202F | HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH | 131,795 | 131,795 | |
| 007 | 0602203F | AEROSPACE PROPULSION | 198,775 | 213,775 | |
| Educational partnership agreements for aerospace propulsion | [10,000] | ||||
| Electrical power/thermal management systems | [5,000] | ||||
| 008 | 0602204F | AEROSPACE SENSORS | 202,912 | 202,912 | |
| 010 | 0602298F | SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT— MAJOR HEADQUARTERS ACTIVITIES | 7,968 | 7,968 | |
| 012 | 0602602F | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS | 142,772 | 142,772 | |
| 013 | 0602605F | DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY | 124,379 | 124,379 | |
| 014 | 0602788F | DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS | 181,562 | 186,562 | |
| Detection and countering of adversarial UAS | [5,000] | ||||
| 015 | 0602890F | HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH | 44,221 | 44,221 | |
| 016 | 1206601F | SPACE TECHNOLOGY | 124,667 | 124,667 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 1,435,626 | 1,470,626 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 017 | 0603112F | ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS | 36,586 | 41,586 | |
| Metals affordability initiative | [5,000] | ||||
| 018 | 0603199F | SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) | 16,249 | 16,249 | |
| 019 | 0603203F | ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS | 38,292 | 38,292 | |
| 020 | 0603211F | AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO | 102,949 | 122,949 | |
| High speed vertical lift demonstration | [5,000] | ||||
| Low cost attritable aircraft technology | [15,000] | ||||
| 021 | 0603216F | AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY | 113,973 | 118,973 | |
| Electrical power systems | [5,000] | ||||
| 022 | 0603270F | ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY | 48,408 | 48,408 | |
| 023 | 0603401F | ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY | 70,525 | 70,525 | |
| 024 | 0603444F | MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) | 11,878 | 11,878 | |
| 025 | 0603456F | HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 37,542 | 37,542 | |
| 026 | 0603601F | CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 225,817 | 225,817 | |
| 027 | 0603605F | ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 37,404 | 37,404 | |
| 028 | 0603680F | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 43,116 | 59,116 | |
| Aerospace composites manufacturing | [10,000] | ||||
| Program increase | [6,000] | ||||
| 029 | 0603788F | BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 56,414 | 56,414 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 839,153 | 885,153 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 031 | 0603260F | INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 5,672 | 5,672 | |
| 032 | 0603742F | COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY | 27,085 | 27,085 | |
| 033 | 0603790F | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 4,955 | 4,955 | |
| 034 | 0603851F | INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL | 44,109 | 44,109 | |
| 036 | 0604002F | AIR FORCE WEATHER SERVICES RESEARCH | 772 | 772 | |
| 037 | 0604004F | ADVANCED ENGINE DEVELOPMENT | 878,442 | 849,442 | |
| Unjustified budget growth | [–29,000] | ||||
| 038 | 0604015F | LONG RANGE STRIKE—BOMBER | 3,003,899 | 3,003,899 | |
| 039 | 0604032F | DIRECTED ENERGY PROTOTYPING | 10,000 | 20,000 | |
| High-value airborne asset protection | [10,000] | ||||
| 040 | 0604033F | HYPERSONICS PROTOTYPING | 576,000 | 536,000 | |
| Program concurrency | [–40,000] | ||||
| 041 | 0604201F | PNT RESILIENCY, MODS, AND IMPROVEMENTS | 92,600 | 124,600 | |
| Program increase | [32,000] | ||||
| 042 | 0604257F | ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SENSORS | 23,145 | 23,145 | |
| 043 | 0604288F | NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPS CENTER (NAOC) RECAP | 16,669 | 16,669 | |
| 044 | 0604317F | TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 23,614 | 23,614 | |
| 045 | 0604327F | HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM | 113,121 | 113,121 | |
| 046 | 0604414F | CYBER RESILIENCY OF WEAPON SYSTEMS-ACS | 56,325 | 56,325 | |
| 047 | 0604776F | DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D | 28,034 | 28,034 | |
| 048 | 0604858F | TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM | 128,476 | 128,476 | |
| 049 | 0605230F | GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT | 570,373 | 489,395 | |
| Program reduction | [–103,000] | ||||
| Technical adjustment for NC3 | [22,022] | ||||
| 050 | 0207100F | LIGHT ATTACK ARMED RECONNAISSANCE (LAAR) SQUADRONS | 35,000 | 35,000 | |
| 051 | 0207110F | NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE | 1,000,000 | 500,000 | |
| Cost-risk associated with development profile | [–500,000] | ||||
| 052 | 0207455F | THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) | 37,290 | 37,290 | |
| 053 | 0208099F | UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| 054 | 0305236F | COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT (CDL EA) | 36,910 | 36,910 | |
| 055 | 0305251F | CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT | 35,000 | 35,000 | |
| 056 | 0305601F | MISSION PARTNER ENVIRONMENTS | 8,550 | 8,550 | |
| 057 | 0306250F | CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 198,864 | 198,864 | |
| 058 | 0306415F | ENABLED CYBER ACTIVITIES | 16,632 | 16,632 | |
| 060 | 0901410F | CONTRACTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM | 20,830 | 20,830 | |
| 061 | 1203164F | NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) | 329,948 | 329,948 | |
| 062 | 1203710F | EO/IR WEATHER SYSTEMS | 101,222 | 101,222 | |
| 063 | 1206422F | WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON | 225,660 | 205,660 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–20,000] | ||||
| 064 | 1206425F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS | 29,776 | 29,776 | |
| 065 | 1206427F | SPACE SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE TRANSITIONS (SSPT) | 142,045 | 162,045 | |
| Accelerate Blackjack prototype demonstration and tech maturation | [20,000] | ||||
| 067 | 1206438F | SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY | 64,231 | 58,231 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–6,000] | ||||
| 068 | 1206730F | SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM | 56,385 | 56,385 | |
| 069 | 1206760F | PROTECTED TACTICAL ENTERPRISE SERVICE (PTES) | 105,003 | 105,003 | |
| 070 | 1206761F | PROTECTED TACTICAL SERVICE (PTS) | 173,694 | 166,194 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–7,500] | ||||
| 071 | 1206855F | EVOLVED STRATEGIC SATCOM (ESS) | 172,206 | 172,206 | |
| 072 | 1206857F | SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE | 33,742 | 30,742 | |
| Program decrease | [–3,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 8,436,279 | 7,811,801 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 073 | 0604200F | FUTURE ADVANCED WEAPON ANALYSIS & PROGRAMS | 246,200 | 200 | |
| Unjustified requirement | [–246,000] | ||||
| 074 | 0604201F | PNT RESILIENCY, MODS, AND IMPROVEMENTS | 67,782 | 67,782 | |
| 075 | 0604222F | NUCLEAR WEAPONS SUPPORT | 4,406 | 4,406 | |
| 076 | 0604270F | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 2,066 | 2,066 | |
| 077 | 0604281F | TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE | 229,631 | 210,331 | |
| Prior-year carryover | [–19,300] | ||||
| 078 | 0604287F | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 9,700 | 9,700 | |
| 079 | 0604329F | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD | 31,241 | 41,241 | |
| Program efficiency initiative | [10,000] | ||||
| 080 | 0604429F | AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK | 2 | 2 | |
| 081 | 0604602F | ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 28,043 | 22,543 | |
| Unjustified requirement (JAGM-F) | [–5,500] | ||||
| 082 | 0604604F | SUBMUNITIONS | 3,045 | 3,045 | |
| 083 | 0604617F | AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT | 19,944 | 19,944 | |
| 084 | 0604706F | LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS | 8,624 | 16,624 | |
| Next-gen ejection seat qualification | [8,000] | ||||
| 085 | 0604735F | COMBAT TRAINING RANGES | 37,365 | 37,365 | |
| 086 | 0604800F | F–35—EMD | 7,628 | 7,628 | |
| 087 | 0604932F | LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON | 712,539 | 712,539 | |
| 088 | 0604933F | ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION | 161,199 | 161,199 | |
| 089 | 0605030F | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) | 2,414 | 2,414 | |
| 091 | 0605056F | OPEN ARCHITECTURE MANAGEMENT | 30,000 | 30,000 | |
| 093 | 0605221F | KC–46 | 59,561 | 59,561 | |
| 094 | 0605223F | ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING | 348,473 | 348,473 | |
| 095 | 0605229F | COMBAT RESCUE HELICOPTER | 247,047 | 246,047 | |
| Support cost growth | [–1,000] | ||||
| 098 | 0605931F | B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | 294,400 | 294,400 | |
| 099 | 0101125F | NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION | 27,564 | 27,564 | |
| 101 | 0207171F | F–15 EPAWSS | 47,322 | 47,322 | |
| 102 | 0207328F | STAND IN ATTACK WEAPON | 162,840 | 127,840 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–35,000] | ||||
| 103 | 0207701F | FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING | 9,797 | 9,797 | |
| 106 | 0401310F | C–32 EXECUTIVE TRANSPORT RECAPITALIZATION | 9,930 | 9,930 | |
| 107 | 0401319F | VC–25B | 757,923 | 757,923 | |
| 108 | 0701212F | AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS | 2,787 | 2,787 | |
| 109 | 1203176F | COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR | 2,000 | 2,000 | |
| 110 | 1203269F | GPS III FOLLOW-ON (GPS IIIF) | 462,875 | 452,875 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–10,000] | ||||
| 111 | 1203940F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS | 76,829 | 56,829 | |
| GBOSS unjustified growth | [–20,000] | ||||
| 112 | 1206421F | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS | 29,037 | 34,037 | |
| Counterspace communications systems pre-planned product improvement | [5,000] | ||||
| 113 | 1206422F | WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON | 2,237 | 2,237 | |
| 114 | 1206425F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS | 412,894 | 362,894 | |
| Unexecutable growth | [–50,000] | ||||
| 116 | 1206431F | ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) | 117,290 | 117,290 | |
| 117 | 1206432F | POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) | 427,400 | 427,400 | |
| 118 | 1206433F | WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) | 1,920 | 1,920 | |
| 119 | 1206441F | SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD | 1 | 1 | |
| 120 | 1206442F | NEXT GENERATION OPIR | 1,395,278 | 1,018,878 | |
| Unexecutable funding profile | [–293,100] | ||||
| Unexecutable funding profile (ground) | [–83,300] | ||||
| 121 | 1206445F | COMMERCIAL SATCOM (COMSATCOM) INTEGRATION | 10,000 | ||
| Accelerate integration of COMSATCOM capabilities | [10,000] | ||||
| 122 | 1206853F | NATIONAL SECURITY SPACE LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD | 432,009 | 432,009 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 6,929,243 | 6,199,043 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 123 | 0604256F | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 59,693 | 59,693 | |
| 124 | 0604759F | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 181,663 | 183,663 | |
| Telemetry extension SATCOM relay | [2,000] | ||||
| 125 | 0605101F | RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE | 35,258 | 35,258 | |
| 127 | 0605712F | INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION | 13,793 | 13,793 | |
| 128 | 0605807F | TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 717,895 | 743,395 | |
| Overwater range telemetry improvements | [25,500] | ||||
| 129 | 0605826F | ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL POWER | 258,667 | 258,667 | |
| 130 | 0605827F | ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL VIG & COMBAT SYS | 251,992 | 251,992 | |
| 131 | 0605828F | ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL REACH | 149,191 | 149,191 | |
| 132 | 0605829F | ACQ WORKFORCE- CYBER, NETWORK, & BUS SYS | 235,360 | 235,360 | |
| 133 | 0605830F | ACQ WORKFORCE- GLOBAL BATTLE MGMT | 160,196 | 160,196 | |
| 134 | 0605831F | ACQ WORKFORCE- CAPABILITY INTEGRATION | 220,255 | 220,255 | |
| 135 | 0605832F | ACQ WORKFORCE- ADVANCED PRGM TECHNOLOGY | 42,392 | 42,392 | |
| 136 | 0605833F | ACQ WORKFORCE- NUCLEAR SYSTEMS | 133,231 | 133,231 | |
| 137 | 0605898F | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 5,590 | 5,590 | |
| 138 | 0605976F | FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 88,445 | 88,445 | |
| 139 | 0605978F | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 29,424 | 29,424 | |
| 140 | 0606017F | REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION | 62,715 | 62,715 | |
| 141 | 0606398F | MANAGEMENT HQ—T&E | 5,013 | 5,013 | |
| 142 | 0308602F | ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS) | 17,128 | 17,128 | |
| 143 | 0702806F | ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 5,913 | 5,913 | |
| 144 | 0804731F | GENERAL SKILL TRAINING | 1,475 | 1,475 | |
| 146 | 1001004F | INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES | 4,071 | 4,071 | |
| 147 | 1206116F | SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT | 19,942 | 14,942 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–5,000] | ||||
| 148 | 1206392F | SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE | 167,810 | 167,810 | |
| 149 | 1206398F | SPACE & MISSILE SYSTEMS CENTER—MHA | 10,170 | 10,170 | |
| 150 | 1206860F | ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) | 13,192 | 23,192 | |
| Small rockets launch services | [10,000] | ||||
| 151 | 1206864F | SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) | 26,097 | 29,097 | |
| Small launch | [3,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 2,916,571 | 2,952,071 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 152 | 0604003F | ADVANCED BATTLE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ABMS) | 35,611 | 20,011 | |
| Program increase—sensor fusion and artificial intelligence technology | [10,000] | ||||
| Unjustified request | [–25,600] | ||||
| 154 | 0604233F | SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING | 2,584 | 2,584 | |
| 155 | 0604445F | WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE | 0 | 20,000 | |
| Program increase | [20,000] | ||||
| 156 | 0604776F | DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D | 903 | 903 | |
| 157 | 0604840F | F–35 C2D2 | 694,455 | 694,455 | |
| 158 | 0605018F | AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) | 40,567 | 40,567 | |
| 159 | 0605024F | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY | 47,193 | 47,193 | |
| 160 | 0605117F | FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION | 70,083 | 70,083 | |
| 161 | 0605278F | HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E | 17,218 | 17,218 | |
| 162 | 0606018F | NC3 INTEGRATION | 25,917 | 25,917 | |
| 164 | 0101113F | B–52 SQUADRONS | 325,974 | 325,974 | |
| 165 | 0101122F | AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) | 10,217 | 10,217 | |
| 166 | 0101126F | B–1B SQUADRONS | 1,000 | 1,000 | |
| 167 | 0101127F | B–2 SQUADRONS | 97,276 | 97,276 | |
| 168 | 0101213F | MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS | 128,961 | 106,939 | |
| Technical adjustment for NC3 | [–22,022] | ||||
| 170 | 0101316F | WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS | 18,177 | 18,177 | |
| 171 | 0101324F | INTEGRATED STRATEGIC PLANNING & ANALYSIS NETWORK | 24,261 | 24,261 | |
| 172 | 0101328F | ICBM REENTRY VEHICLES | 75,571 | 75,571 | |
| 174 | 0102110F | UH–1N REPLACEMENT PROGRAM | 170,975 | 170,975 | |
| 176 | 0205219F | MQ–9 UAV | 154,996 | 154,996 | |
| 178 | 0207131F | A–10 SQUADRONS | 36,816 | 36,816 | |
| 179 | 0207133F | F–16 SQUADRONS | 193,013 | 193,013 | |
| 180 | 0207134F | F–15E SQUADRONS | 336,079 | 317,779 | |
| Unjustified F–15C requirements | [–18,300] | ||||
| 181 | 0207136F | MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION | 15,521 | 15,521 | |
| 182 | 0207138F | F–22A SQUADRONS | 496,298 | 442,498 | |
| Excess to requirements | [–23,800] | ||||
| Prior-year carryover | [–30,000] | ||||
| 183 | 0207142F | F–35 SQUADRONS | 99,943 | 99,943 | |
| 184 | 0207161F | TACTICAL AIM MISSILES | 10,314 | 10,314 | |
| 185 | 0207163F | ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) | 55,384 | 55,384 | |
| 186 | 0207227F | COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE | 281 | 281 | |
| 187 | 0207247F | AF TENCAP | 21,365 | 21,365 | |
| 188 | 0207249F | PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT | 10,696 | 10,696 | |
| 189 | 0207253F | COMPASS CALL | 15,888 | 15,888 | |
| 190 | 0207268F | AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 112,505 | 107,505 | |
| Prior-year carryover (F–35) | [–5,000] | ||||
| 191 | 0207325F | JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) | 78,498 | 78,498 | |
| 192 | 0207410F | AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) | 114,864 | 104,864 | |
| Unjustified request | [–10,000] | ||||
| 193 | 0207412F | CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) | 8,109 | 8,109 | |
| 194 | 0207417F | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) | 67,996 | 61,209 | |
| Excess to need | [–6,787] | ||||
| 195 | 0207418F | TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 2,462 | 2,462 | |
| 197 | 0207431F | COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES | 13,668 | 13,668 | |
| 198 | 0207444F | TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD | 6,217 | 6,217 | |
| 200 | 0207452F | DCAPES | 19,910 | 19,910 | |
| 201 | 0207573F | NATIONAL TECHNICAL NUCLEAR FORENSICS | 1,788 | 1,788 | |
| 202 | 0207590F | SEEK EAGLE | 28,237 | 28,237 | |
| 203 | 0207601F | USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION | 15,725 | 15,725 | |
| 204 | 0207605F | WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS | 4,316 | 4,316 | |
| 205 | 0207610F | BATTLEFIELD ABN COMM NODE (BACN) | 26,946 | 26,946 | |
| 206 | 0207697F | DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES | 4,303 | 4,303 | |
| 207 | 0208006F | MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 71,465 | 71,465 | |
| 208 | 0208007F | TACTICAL DECEPTION | 7,446 | 7,446 | |
| 209 | 0208064F | OPERATIONAL HQ—CYBER | 7,602 | 7,602 | |
| 210 | 0208087F | DISTRIBUTED CYBER WARFARE OPERATIONS | 35,178 | 35,178 | |
| 211 | 0208088F | AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 16,609 | 16,609 | |
| 212 | 0208097F | JOINT CYBER COMMAND AND CONTROL (JCC2) | 11,603 | 11,603 | |
| 213 | 0208099F | UNIFIED PLATFORM (UP) | 84,702 | 84,702 | |
| 219 | 0301025F | GEOBASE | 2,723 | 2,723 | |
| 220 | 0301112F | NUCLEAR PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM (NPES) | 44,190 | 44,190 | |
| 226 | 0301401F | AIR FORCE SPACE AND CYBER NON-TRADITIONAL ISR FOR BATTLESPACE AWARENESS | 3,575 | 3,575 | |
| 227 | 0302015F | E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) | 70,173 | 70,173 | |
| 228 | 0303131F | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) | 13,543 | 28,543 | |
| Advanced concept development—NC3 demonstration and evaluation | [15,000] | ||||
| 229 | 0303133F | HIGH FREQUENCY RADIO SYSTEMS | 15,881 | 1,881 | |
| Prior-year carryover | [–14,000] | ||||
| 230 | 0303140F | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 27,726 | 27,726 | |
| 232 | 0303142F | GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT—DATA INITIATIVE | 2,210 | 2,210 | |
| 234 | 0304115F | MULTI DOMAIN COMMAND AND CONTROL (MDC2) | 150,880 | 100,880 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–50,000] | ||||
| 235 | 0304260F | AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE | 102,667 | 94,167 | |
| Common development ahead of need | [–8,500] | ||||
| 236 | 0304310F | COMMERCIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS | 3,431 | 3,431 | |
| 239 | 0305015F | C2 AIR OPERATIONS SUITE—C2 INFO SERVICES | 9,313 | 9,313 | |
| 240 | 0305020F | CCMD INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 1,121 | 1,121 | |
| 241 | 0305022F | ISR MODERNIZATION & AUTOMATION DVMT (IMAD) | 19,000 | 3,000 | |
| Unjustified request | [–16,000] | ||||
| 242 | 0305099F | GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) | 4,544 | 4,544 | |
| 243 | 0305111F | WEATHER SERVICE | 25,461 | 27,461 | |
| Commercial weather data pilot | [2,000] | ||||
| 244 | 0305114F | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) | 5,651 | 5,651 | |
| 245 | 0305116F | AERIAL TARGETS | 7,448 | 7,448 | |
| 248 | 0305128F | SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES | 425 | 425 | |
| 249 | 0305145F | ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION | 54,546 | 54,546 | |
| 250 | 0305146F | DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 6,858 | 6,858 | |
| 252 | 0305179F | INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) | 8,728 | 8,728 | |
| 253 | 0305202F | DRAGON U–2 | 38,939 | 38,939 | |
| 255 | 0305206F | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 122,909 | 132,909 | |
| Program increase for Gorgon Stare sensor enhancements | [10,000] | ||||
| 256 | 0305207F | MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 11,787 | 11,787 | |
| 257 | 0305208F | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 25,009 | 25,009 | |
| 258 | 0305220F | RQ–4 UAV | 191,733 | 173,883 | |
| Unjustified request | [–17,850] | ||||
| 259 | 0305221F | NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING | 10,757 | 10,757 | |
| 260 | 0305238F | NATO AGS | 32,567 | 32,567 | |
| 261 | 0305240F | SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE | 37,774 | 37,774 | |
| 262 | 0305600F | INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES | 13,515 | 13,515 | |
| 263 | 0305881F | RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION | 4,383 | 4,383 | |
| 264 | 0305984F | PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMMAND & CTRL (PRC2) | 2,133 | 2,133 | |
| 265 | 0307577F | INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) | 8,614 | 8,614 | |
| 266 | 0401115F | C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON | 140,425 | 140,425 | |
| 267 | 0401119F | C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) | 10,223 | 10,223 | |
| 268 | 0401130F | C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) | 25,101 | 25,101 | |
| 269 | 0401132F | C–130J PROGRAM | 8,640 | 8,640 | |
| 270 | 0401134F | LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) | 5,424 | 5,424 | |
| 272 | 0401219F | KC–10S | 20 | 20 | |
| 274 | 0401318F | CV–22 | 17,906 | 17,906 | |
| 276 | 0408011F | SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL | 3,629 | 3,629 | |
| 277 | 0702207F | DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) | 1,890 | 1,890 | |
| 278 | 0708055F | MAINTENANCE, REPAIR & OVERHAUL SYSTEM | 10,311 | 10,311 | |
| 279 | 0708610F | LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) | 16,065 | 16,065 | |
| 280 | 0708611F | SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 539 | 539 | |
| 281 | 0804743F | OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING | 2,057 | 2,057 | |
| 282 | 0808716F | OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES | 10 | 10 | |
| 283 | 0901202F | JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY | 2,060 | 2,060 | |
| 284 | 0901218F | CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM | 3,809 | 3,809 | |
| 285 | 0901220F | PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION | 6,476 | 6,476 | |
| 286 | 0901226F | AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY | 1,443 | 1,443 | |
| 287 | 0901538F | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 9,323 | 9,323 | |
| 288 | 0901554F | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACNTNG AND MGT SYS (DEAMS) | 46,789 | 46,789 | |
| 289 | 1201017F | GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN) | 3,647 | 3,647 | |
| 290 | 1201921F | SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES | 988 | 988 | |
| 291 | 1202140F | SERVICE SUPPORT TO SPACECOM ACTIVITIES | 11,863 | 11,863 | |
| 293 | 1203001F | FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS (FAB-T) | 197,388 | 192,388 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–5,000] | ||||
| 294 | 1203110F | SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) | 61,891 | 54,291 | |
| Underexecution of funds and unjustified growth | [–7,600] | ||||
| 297 | 1203173F | SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER | 4,566 | 4,566 | |
| 298 | 1203174F | SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 43,292 | 43,292 | |
| 300 | 1203182F | SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) | 10,837 | 10,837 | |
| 301 | 1203265F | GPS III SPACE SEGMENT | 42,440 | 42,440 | |
| 302 | 1203400F | SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE | 14,428 | 14,428 | |
| 303 | 1203614F | JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM | 72,762 | 51,262 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–21,500] | ||||
| 304 | 1203620F | NATIONAL SPACE DEFENSE CENTER | 2,653 | 2,653 | |
| 306 | 1203873F | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE RADARS | 15,881 | 15,881 | |
| 308 | 1203913F | NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) | 49,300 | 49,300 | |
| 309 | 1203940F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS | 17,834 | 17,834 | |
| 310 | 1206423F | GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT | 445,302 | 445,302 | |
| 311 | 1206770F | ENTERPRISE GROUND SERVICES | 138,870 | 128,670 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–10,200] | ||||
| 311A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 18,351,506 | 17,998,506 | |
| Classified reduction | [–353,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 24,851,488 | 24,263,329 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | 45,938,121 | 44,111,784 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 001 | 0601000BR | DTRA BASIC RESEARCH | 26,000 | 26,000 | |
| 002 | 0601101E | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 432,284 | 432,284 | |
| 003 | 0601110D8Z | BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 48,874 | 58,874 | |
| Program increase | [10,000] | ||||
| 004 | 0601117E | BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE | 54,122 | 54,122 | |
| 005 | 0601120D8Z | NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM | 92,074 | 112,074 | |
| Civics education grant program | [20,000] | ||||
| 006 | 0601228D8Z | HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS | 30,708 | 50,708 | |
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||||
| Program increase | [25,000] | ||||
| 007 | 0601384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 45,238 | 45,238 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 729,300 | 779,300 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 008 | 0602000D8Z | JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY | 19,306 | 19,306 | |
| 009 | 0602115E | BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 97,771 | 97,771 | |
| 011 | 0602234D8Z | LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM | 52,317 | 52,317 | |
| 012 | 0602251D8Z | APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES | 62,200 | 62,200 | |
| 013 | 0602303E | INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY | 442,556 | 442,556 | |
| 014 | 0602383E | BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE | 34,588 | 34,588 | |
| 015 | 0602384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 202,587 | 215,087 | |
| Program increase | [12,500] | ||||
| 016 | 0602668D8Z | CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH | 15,118 | 15,118 | |
| 017 | 0602702E | TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY | 337,602 | 337,602 | |
| 018 | 0602715E | MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY | 223,976 | 223,976 | |
| 019 | 0602716E | ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY | 332,192 | 332,192 | |
| 020 | 0602718BR | COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 179,096 | 179,096 | |
| 021 | 0602751D8Z | SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH | 9,580 | 9,580 | |
| 022 | 1160401BB | SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 40,569 | 40,569 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 2,049,458 | 2,061,958 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 023 | 0603000D8Z | JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 25,779 | 25,779 | |
| 024 | 0603121D8Z | SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| 025 | 0603122D8Z | COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 70,517 | 79,517 | |
| Counterterrorism detection technologies | [3,000] | ||||
| Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) | [6,000] | ||||
| 026 | 0603133D8Z | FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING | 24,970 | 24,970 | |
| 028 | 0603160BR | COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 340,065 | 340,065 | |
| 029 | 0603176C | ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT | 14,208 | 14,208 | |
| 030 | 0603178C | WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| 031 | 0603180C | ADVANCED RESEARCH | 20,674 | 27,674 | |
| Advanced carbon-carbon composites manufacturing | [7,000] | ||||
| 032 | 0603225D8Z | JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 18,773 | 18,773 | |
| 033 | 0603286E | ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS | 279,741 | 279,741 | |
| 034 | 0603287E | SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY | 202,606 | 202,606 | |
| 035 | 0603288D8Z | ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS | 19,429 | 19,429 | |
| 036 | 0603289D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS | 37,645 | 37,645 | |
| 037 | 0603291D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS—MHA | 14,668 | 14,668 | |
| 038 | 0603294C | COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY | 13,600 | 13,600 | |
| 040 | 0603342D8Z | DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) | 29,398 | 29,398 | |
| 041 | 0603375D8Z | TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION | 60,000 | 44,000 | |
| Program decrease | [–16,000] | ||||
| 042 | 0603384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 172,486 | 172,486 | |
| 043 | 0603527D8Z | RETRACT LARCH | 159,688 | 159,688 | |
| 044 | 0603618D8Z | JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 12,063 | 17,063 | |
| Joint electromagnetic spectrum operations | [5,000] | ||||
| 045 | 0603648D8Z | JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 107,359 | 107,359 | |
| 046 | 0603662D8Z | NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES | 2,858 | 2,858 | |
| 047 | 0603680D8Z | DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 96,397 | 116,397 | |
| Additive manufacturing | [10,000] | ||||
| Integrated silicon based lasers | [5,000] | ||||
| Program increase | [5,000] | ||||
| 048 | 0603680S | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 42,834 | 42,834 | |
| 049 | 0603699D8Z | EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 80,911 | 80,911 | |
| 050 | 0603712S | GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 10,817 | 10,817 | |
| 051 | 0603716D8Z | STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM | 66,157 | 66,157 | |
| 052 | 0603720S | MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT | 171,771 | 171,771 | |
| 053 | 0603727D8Z | JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM | 4,846 | 4,846 | |
| 054 | 0603739E | ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES | 128,616 | 128,616 | |
| 055 | 0603760E | COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 232,134 | 232,134 | |
| 056 | 0603766E | NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY | 512,424 | 512,424 | |
| 057 | 0603767E | SENSOR TECHNOLOGY | 163,903 | 163,903 | |
| 058 | 0603769D8Z | DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 13,723 | 13,723 | |
| 059 | 0603781D8Z | SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE | 15,111 | 15,111 | |
| 060 | 0603826D8Z | QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS | 47,147 | 47,147 | |
| 061 | 0603833D8Z | ENGINEERING SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 19,376 | 19,376 | |
| 062 | 0603924D8Z | HIGH ENERGY LASER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 85,223 | 85,223 | |
| 063 | 0603941D8Z | TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 175,574 | 180,574 | |
| UAV hypersonic test range | [5,000] | ||||
| 064 | 0603950D8Z | NATIONAL SECURITY INNOVATION NETWORK | 25,000 | 30,000 | |
| Hacking for defense | [5,000] | ||||
| 065 | 0604055D8Z | OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT | 70,536 | 70,536 | |
| 066 | 0303310D8Z | CWMD SYSTEMS | 28,907 | 28,907 | |
| 068 | 1160402BB | SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 89,154 | 89,154 | |
| 069 | 1206310SDA | SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 20,000 | 41,500 | |
| Program increase for commercial SSA; funds transferred from JSPOC Mission System | [21,500] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 3,742,088 | 3,798,588 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 070 | 0603161D8Z | NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P | 42,695 | 42,695 | |
| 071 | 0603600D8Z | WALKOFF | 92,791 | 92,791 | |
| 072 | 0603821D8Z | ACQUISITION ENTERPRISE DATA & INFORMATION SERVICES | 5,659 | 5,659 | |
| 073 | 0603851D8Z | ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM | 66,572 | 66,572 | |
| 074 | 0603881C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT | 302,761 | 302,761 | |
| 075 | 0603882C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT | 1,156,506 | 960,506 | |
| GBSD booster engineering | [–15,000] | ||||
| Unjustified program growth | [–181,000] | ||||
| 076 | 0603884BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL | 83,662 | 83,662 | |
| 077 | 0603884C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS | 283,487 | 283,487 | |
| 078 | 0603890C | BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS | 571,507 | 570,476 | |
| Rescope FTM–44—Conduct IRBM test | [–1,031] | ||||
| 079 | 0603891C | SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA | 377,098 | 504,098 | |
| Classified reduction | [–8,000] | ||||
| Classified unfunded priority | [135,000] | ||||
| 080 | 0603892C | AEGIS BMD | 727,479 | 702,479 | |
| Unjustified cost growth | [–25,000] | ||||
| 081 | 0603896C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI | 564,206 | 561,706 | |
| IBCS integration delays | [–1,500] | ||||
| Rescope FTM–44—Conduct IRBM test | [–1,000] | ||||
| 082 | 0603898C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT | 51,532 | 51,532 | |
| 083 | 0603904C | MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) | 56,161 | 56,161 | |
| 084 | 0603906C | REGARDING TRENCH | 22,424 | 22,424 | |
| 085 | 0603907C | SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) | 128,156 | 128,156 | |
| 086 | 0603913C | ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS | 300,000 | 300,000 | |
| 087 | 0603914C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST | 395,924 | 393,356 | |
| Rescope FTM–44—Conduct IRBM test | [–2,568] | ||||
| 088 | 0603915C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS | 554,171 | 554,171 | |
| 089 | 0603920D8Z | HUMANITARIAN DEMINING | 10,820 | 15,820 | |
| Program increase | [5,000] | ||||
| 090 | 0603923D8Z | COALITION WARFARE | 11,316 | 11,316 | |
| 091 | 0604016D8Z | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM | 3,365 | 3,365 | |
| 092 | 0604115C | TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES | 303,458 | 301,122 | |
| Cancel Neutral Particle Beam | [–34,000] | ||||
| Increase to low power laser demonstrator | [35,000] | ||||
| Rescope FTM–44—Conduct IRBM test | [–3,336] | ||||
| 093 | 0604132D8Z | MISSILE DEFEAT PROJECT | 17,816 | 7,816 | |
| Lack of justification—program transitioned to military services | [–10,000] | ||||
| 095 | 0604181C | HYPERSONIC DEFENSE | 157,425 | 157,425 | |
| 096 | 0604250D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES | 1,312,735 | 1,104,585 | |
| Program decrease | [–58,150] | ||||
| Realign to 0604011D8Z, Next Generation Information Technology | [–50,000] | ||||
| Undistributed | [–100,000] | ||||
| 097 | 0604294D8Z | TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS | 542,421 | 542,421 | |
| 098 | 0604331D8Z | RAPID PROTOTYPING PROGRAM | 100,957 | 100,957 | |
| 099 | 0604341D8Z | DEFENSE INNOVATION UNIT (DIU) PROTOTYPING | 92,000 | 17,000 | |
| Insufficient budget justification for national security innovation capital | [–75,000] | ||||
| 100 | 0604400D8Z | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED SYSTEM COMMON DEVELOPMENT | 3,021 | 3,021 | |
| 102 | 0604672C | HOMELAND DEFENSE RADAR—HAWAII (HDR-H) | 274,714 | 274,714 | |
| 103 | 0604673C | PACIFIC DISCRIMINATING RADAR | 6,711 | 6,711 | |
| 104 | 0604682D8Z | WARGAMING AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SSA) | 3,751 | 3,751 | |
| 105 | 0604775BR | DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM | 14,021 | 14,021 | |
| 107 | 0604826J | JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSMENTS | 20,062 | 20,062 | |
| 108 | 0604873C | LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR (LRDR) | 136,423 | 136,423 | |
| 109 | 0604874C | IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS | 412,363 | 262,363 | |
| Program delays | [–150,000] | ||||
| 110 | 0604876C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST | 25,137 | 25,137 | |
| 111 | 0604878C | AEGIS BMD TEST | 169,822 | 148,740 | |
| Rescope FTM–44—Conduct IRBM test | [–21,082] | ||||
| 112 | 0604879C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST | 105,530 | 94,566 | |
| Rescope FTM–44—Conduct IRBM test | [–10,964] | ||||
| 113 | 0604880C | LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) | 38,352 | 38,352 | |
| 115 | 0604887C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE SEGMENT TEST | 98,139 | 96,446 | |
| Rescope FTM–44—Conduct IRBM test | [–1,693] | ||||
| 117 | 0300206R | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS | 1,600 | 1,600 | |
| 118 | 0303191D8Z | JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM | 3,191 | 3,191 | |
| 119 | 0305103C | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 1,138 | 1,138 | |
| 120 | 1206410SDA | SPACE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPING | 85,000 | 75,000 | |
| Increase to SDA for multi-GNSS receiver capability development | [20,000] | ||||
| Space-based discrimination study | [–15,000] | ||||
| Space-based interceptor study | [–15,000] | ||||
| 121 | 1206893C | SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 35,849 | 35,849 | |
| 122 | 1206895C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS | 27,565 | 135,565 | |
| Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor | [108,000] | ||||
| 122A | 0604011D8Z | NEXT GENERATION INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (5G) | 175,000 | ||
| Program increase | [175,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | 9,797,493 | 9,496,169 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 123 | 0604161D8Z | NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD | 11,276 | 11,276 | |
| 124 | 0604165D8Z | PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 107,000 | 0 | |
| Lack of justification—awaiting policy | [–76,000] | ||||
| Transfer to RDTE, Army Line 100 | [–31,000] | ||||
| 125 | 0604384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD | 384,047 | 384,047 | |
| 126 | 0604771D8Z | JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) | 40,102 | 43,102 | |
| Cyber maturity model certification program | [3,000] | ||||
| 127 | 0605000BR | COUNTER WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 13,100 | 13,100 | |
| 128 | 0605013BL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 3,070 | 3,070 | |
| 129 | 0605021SE | HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE | 7,295 | 7,295 | |
| 130 | 0605022D8Z | DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM | 17,615 | 7,615 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–10,000] | ||||
| 131 | 0605027D8Z | OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES | 15,653 | 15,653 | |
| 132 | 0605070S | DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 2,378 | 2,378 | |
| 133 | 0605075D8Z | CMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION | 1,618 | 1,618 | |
| 134 | 0605080S | DEFENSE AGENCY INITIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM | 27,944 | 27,944 | |
| 135 | 0605090S | DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS) | 6,609 | 6,609 | |
| 136 | 0605210D8Z | DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES | 9,619 | 9,619 | |
| 137 | 0605294D8Z | TRUSTED & ASSURED MICROELECTRONICS | 175,032 | 175,032 | |
| 138 | 0303140BL | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 425 | 425 | |
| 139 | 0303141K | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 1,578 | 1,578 | |
| 140 | 0305304D8Z | DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) | 4,373 | 4,373 | |
| 141 | 0305310D8Z | CWMD SYSTEMS: SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 12,854 | 12,854 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 841,588 | 727,588 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 142 | 0603829J | JOINT CAPABILITY EXPERIMENTATION | 13,000 | 13,000 | |
| 143 | 0604774D8Z | DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) | 9,724 | 9,724 | |
| 144 | 0604875D8Z | JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT | 9,593 | 9,593 | |
| 145 | 0604940D8Z | CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) | 260,267 | 240,267 | |
| Undistributed | [–20,000] | ||||
| 146 | 0604942D8Z | ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS | 30,834 | 30,834 | |
| 147 | 0605001E | MISSION SUPPORT | 68,498 | 68,498 | |
| 148 | 0605100D8Z | JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) | 83,091 | 83,091 | |
| 149 | 0605104D8Z | TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS | 18,079 | 18,079 | |
| 150 | 0605126J | JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) | 70,038 | 70,038 | |
| 152 | 0605142D8Z | SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 37,140 | 37,140 | |
| 153 | 0605151D8Z | STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD | 4,759 | 4,759 | |
| 154 | 0605161D8Z | NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY | 8,307 | 8,307 | |
| 155 | 0605170D8Z | SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION | 9,441 | 9,441 | |
| 156 | 0605200D8Z | GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) | 1,700 | 1,700 | |
| 157 | 0605384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 110,363 | 110,363 | |
| 166 | 0605790D8Z | SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 3,568 | 3,568 | |
| 167 | 0605797D8Z | MAINTAINING TECHNOLOGY ADVANTAGE | 19,936 | 19,936 | |
| 168 | 0605798D8Z | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS | 16,875 | 19,875 | |
| National Science, Technology, and Security Roundtable with Academia | [3,000] | ||||
| 169 | 0605801KA | DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) | 57,716 | 57,716 | |
| 170 | 0605803SE | R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION | 34,448 | 34,448 | |
| 171 | 0605804D8Z | DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION | 22,203 | 22,203 | |
| 172 | 0605898E | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 13,208 | 13,208 | |
| 173 | 0605998KA | MANAGEMENT HQ—DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) | 3,027 | 3,027 | |
| 174 | 0606100D8Z | BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS | 8,017 | 8,017 | |
| 175 | 0606225D8Z | ODNA TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE ANALYSIS | 3,194 | 3,194 | |
| 176 | 0606589D8W | DEFENSE DIGITAL SERVICE (DDS) DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT | 1,000 | 1,000 | |
| 179 | 0203345D8Z | DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) | 3,037 | 3,037 | |
| 180 | 0204571J | JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT | 9,216 | 9,216 | |
| 183 | 0303166J | SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES | 553 | 553 | |
| 184 | 0303260D8Z | DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO) | 1,014 | 1,014 | |
| 185 | 0305172K | COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS | 58,667 | 58,667 | |
| 187 | 0305245D8Z | INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES AND INNOVATION INVESTMENTS | 21,081 | 21,081 | |
| 189 | 0307588D8Z | ALGORITHMIC WARFARE CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAMS | 221,235 | 221,235 | |
| 191 | 0804768J | COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)—NON-MHA | 40,073 | 40,073 | |
| 192 | 0808709SE | DEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (DEOMI) | 100 | 100 | |
| 193 | 0901598C | MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA | 27,065 | 27,065 | |
| 194 | 0903235K | JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER (JSP) | 3,090 | 3,090 | |
| 194A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 51,471 | 51,471 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,354,628 | 1,337,628 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||
| 195 | 0604130V | ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) | 7,945 | 7,945 | |
| 196 | 0604532K | JOINT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 208,834 | 166,834 | |
| Early to need | [–42,000] | ||||
| 197 | 0605127T | REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA | 1,947 | 1,947 | |
| 198 | 0605147T | OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS) | 310 | 310 | |
| 199 | 0607210D8Z | INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT | 10,051 | 19,051 | |
| Composite manufacturing technology | [5,000] | ||||
| Lithium ion batteries | [4,000] | ||||
| 200 | 0607310D8Z | CWMD SYSTEMS: OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 12,734 | 12,734 | |
| 201 | 0607327T | GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS) | 14,800 | 14,800 | |
| 202 | 0607384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) | 54,023 | 54,023 | |
| 203 | 0208043J | PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) | 4,537 | 4,537 | |
| 204 | 0208045K | C4I INTEROPERABILITY | 64,122 | 64,122 | |
| 210 | 0302019K | DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION | 15,798 | 15,798 | |
| 211 | 0303126K | LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS | 11,166 | 11,166 | |
| 212 | 0303131K | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) | 17,383 | 17,383 | |
| 214 | 0303136G | KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) | 54,516 | 54,516 | |
| 215 | 0303140D8Z | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 67,631 | 89,631 | |
| Cyber institutes for senior military colleges | [12,000] | ||||
| Implementation of Cyber Excepted Service | [10,000] | ||||
| 216 | 0303140G | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 289,080 | 287,198 | |
| Realignment to DISA for Sharkseer | [–1,882] | ||||
| 217 | 0303140K | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 42,796 | 44,678 | |
| Realignment for Sharkseer | [1,882] | ||||
| 218 | 0303150K | GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 25,218 | 25,218 | |
| 219 | 0303153K | DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION | 21,698 | 21,698 | |
| 220 | 0303228K | JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) | 18,077 | 18,077 | |
| 222 | 0303430K | FEDERAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 44,001 | 44,001 | |
| 228 | 0305128V | SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES | 2,400 | 2,400 | |
| 232 | 0305186D8Z | POLICY R&D PROGRAMS | 6,301 | 6,301 | |
| 233 | 0305199D8Z | NET CENTRICITY | 21,384 | 21,384 | |
| 235 | 0305208BB | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 6,359 | 6,359 | |
| 238 | 0305208K | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 2,981 | 2,981 | |
| 241 | 0305327V | INSIDER THREAT | 1,964 | 1,964 | |
| 242 | 0305387D8Z | HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM | 2,221 | 2,221 | |
| 250 | 0708012K | LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 1,361 | 1,361 | |
| 251 | 0708012S | PACIFIC DISASTER CENTERS | 1,770 | 1,770 | |
| 252 | 0708047S | DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM | 3,679 | 3,679 | |
| 254 | 1105219BB | MQ–9 UAV | 20,697 | 20,697 | |
| 256 | 1160403BB | AVIATION SYSTEMS | 245,795 | 263,021 | |
| Program increase—Future Vertical Lift | [8,800] | ||||
| Program increase—RFCM | [8,426] | ||||
| 257 | 1160405BB | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 15,484 | 15,484 | |
| 258 | 1160408BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 166,922 | 166,922 | |
| 259 | 1160431BB | WARRIOR SYSTEMS | 62,332 | 62,332 | |
| 260 | 1160432BB | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 21,805 | 21,805 | |
| 261 | 1160434BB | UNMANNED ISR | 37,377 | 37,377 | |
| 262 | 1160480BB | SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES | 11,150 | 11,150 | |
| 263 | 1160483BB | MARITIME SYSTEMS | 72,626 | 72,626 | |
| 264 | 1160489BB | GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES | 5,363 | 5,363 | |
| 265 | 1160490BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 12,962 | 12,962 | |
| 266 | 1203610K | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 6,158 | 6,158 | |
| 266A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 4,542,640 | 4,542,640 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 6,258,398 | 6,383,624 | |||
| 267A | 9999999999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 119,000 | ||
| Transfer to NRO for weather satellite procurement to mitigate weather capability gaps risk in 2022–2023 | [119,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 125,226 | ||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 24,772,953 | 24,584,855 | |||
| OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE | |||||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 001 | 0605118OTE | OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION | 93,291 | 93,291 | |
| 002 | 0605131OTE | LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION | 69,172 | 69,172 | |
| 003 | 0605814OTE | OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES | 58,737 | 58,737 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 221,200 | 221,200 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE | 221,200 | 221,200 | |||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 103,395,544 | 100,787,668 | |||
| SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 074 | 0603327A | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 500 | 500 | |
| 079 | 0603747A | SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| 085 | 0603804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV | 1,085 | 1,085 | |
| 095 | 0604117A | MANEUVER—SHORT RANGE AIR DEFENSE (M-SHORAD) | 6,000 | 0 | |
| Unjustified request | [–6,000] | ||||
| 097 | 0604119A | ARMY ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPING | 4,529 | 4,529 | |
| 105 | 0604785A | INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE (BUDGET ACTIVITY 4) | 2,000 | 0 | |
| Unjustified request | [–2,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 17,114 | 9,114 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 151 | 0605035A | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 11,770 | 11,770 | |
| 159 | 0605051A | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 77,420 | 77,420 | |
| 163 | 0605203A | ARMY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 19,527 | 19,527 | |
| 174 | 0304270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 3,200 | 3,200 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 111,917 | 111,917 | |||
| RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 200 | 0606003A | COUNTERINTEL AND HUMAN INTEL MODERNIZATION | 1,875 | 1,875 | |
| SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,875 | 1,875 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 238 | 0303028A | SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 22,904 | 22,904 | |
| 246 | 0305204A | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 34,100 | 34,100 | |
| 247 | 0305206A | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 14,000 | 14,000 | |
| 252 | 0307665A | BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE | 2,214 | 2,214 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 73,218 | 73,218 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 204,124 | 196,124 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 028 | 0603207N | AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS | 2,400 | 2,400 | |
| 038 | 0603527N | RETRACT LARCH | 22,000 | 22,000 | |
| 057 | 0603654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 14,178 | 14,178 | |
| 069 | 0603795N | LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY | 1,428 | 1,428 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 40,006 | 40,006 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 143 | 0604755N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) | 1,122 | 1,122 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 1,122 | 1,122 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 228 | 0206313M | MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 15,000 | 15,000 | |
| 259A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 108,282 | 108,282 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 123,282 | 123,282 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 164,410 | 164,410 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 048 | 0604858F | TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM | 26,450 | 26,450 | |
| 072 | 1206857F | SPACE RAPID CAPABILITIES OFFICE | 17,885 | 17,885 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 44,335 | 44,335 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 177 | 0205671F | JOINT COUNTER RCIED ELECTRONIC WARFARE | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
| 217 | 0208288F | INTEL DATA APPLICATIONS | 1,200 | 1,200 | |
| 311A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 78,713 | 78,713 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 83,913 | 83,913 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | 128,248 | 128,248 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 010 | 0602134BR | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT ADVANCED STUDIES | 1,677 | 1,677 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 1,677 | 1,677 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 025 | 0603122D8Z | COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 25,230 | 25,230 | |
| 027 | 0603134BR | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT SIMULATION | 49,528 | 49,528 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 74,758 | 74,758 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 094 | 0604134BR | COUNTER IMPROVISED-THREAT DEMONSTRATION, PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT, AND TESTING | 113,590 | 113,590 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | 113,590 | 113,590 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||
| 258 | 1160408BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 726 | 726 | |
| 259 | 1160431BB | WARRIOR SYSTEMS | 6,000 | 6,000 | |
| 261 | 1160434BB | UNMANNED ISR | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| 266A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 200,199 | 200,199 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 211,925 | 211,925 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 401,950 | 401,950 | |||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 898,732 | 890,732 | |||
| SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | |
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 1,735,922 | 1,659,222 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–76,700] | |||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 127,815 | 126,515 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–1,300] | |||
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 716,356 | 709,356 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–7,000] | |||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 890,891 | 881,991 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–8,900] | |||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,232,477 | 1,230,477 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–2,000] | |||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 1,355,606 | 1,282,106 | |
| Excess to need | [–73,500] | |||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 3,882,315 | 2,659,315 | |
| Excess FTE request | [–38,000] | |||
| Female Personal Protective Equipment | [2,000] | |||
| Realignment to OCO | [–1,100,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–12,000] | |||
| Unjustified transfer | [–75,000] | |||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 417,069 | 417,069 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,633,327 | 1,633,327 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 8,047,933 | 8,002,933 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–45,000] | |||
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 4,326,840 | 4,051,840 | |
| Unexecutable growth | [–275,000] | |||
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 405,612 | 405,612 | |
| 160 | US AFRICA COMMAND | 251,511 | 251,511 | |
| 170 | US EUROPEAN COMMAND | 146,358 | 146,358 | |
| 180 | US SOUTHERN COMMAND | 191,840 | 218,340 | |
| Multi-Mission Support Vessel | [18,000] | |||
| Overland airborne ISR operations | [8,500] | |||
| 190 | US FORCES KOREA | 57,603 | 57,603 | |
| 200 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 423,156 | 423,156 | |
| 210 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY | 551,185 | 551,185 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 26,393,816 | 24,707,916 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 220 | STRATEGIC MOBILITY | 380,577 | 380,577 | |
| 230 | ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS | 362,942 | 362,942 | |
| 240 | INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | 4,637 | 4,637 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 748,156 | 748,156 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 250 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 157,175 | 157,175 | |
| 260 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 55,739 | 55,739 | |
| 270 | ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING | 62,300 | 62,300 | |
| 280 | SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS | 538,357 | 538,357 | |
| 290 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 969,813 | 969,813 | |
| 300 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 1,234,049 | 1,209,049 | |
| Changes to AH–64E Program | [–25,000] | |||
| 310 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 218,338 | 218,338 | |
| 320 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 554,659 | 550,659 | |
| Excess travel request | [–4,000] | |||
| 330 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 716,056 | 716,056 | |
| 340 | EXAMINING | 185,034 | 185,034 | |
| 350 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 214,275 | 214,275 | |
| 360 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 147,647 | 147,647 | |
| 370 | JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS | 173,812 | 173,812 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 5,227,254 | 5,198,254 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 390 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 559,229 | 559,229 | |
| 400 | CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES | 929,944 | 927,944 | |
| Excess personnel | [–2,000] | |||
| 410 | LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 629,981 | 629,981 | |
| 420 | AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT | 458,771 | 458,771 | |
| 430 | ADMINISTRATION | 428,768 | 428,768 | |
| 440 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 1,512,736 | 1,512,736 | |
| 450 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 272,738 | 272,738 | |
| 460 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 391,869 | 381,869 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–10,000] | |||
| 470 | OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT | 1,901,165 | 1,896,080 | |
| Unjustified headquarters growth | [–5,085] | |||
| 480 | ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES | 198,765 | 198,765 | |
| 490 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 226,248 | 226,248 | |
| 500 | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS | 315,489 | 310,489 | |
| Unjustified growth to General Fund Enterprise Business System | [–5,000] | |||
| 510 | INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS | 427,254 | 427,254 | |
| 520 | MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS | 43,248 | 43,248 | |
| 565 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,347,053 | 1,347,053 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 9,643,258 | 9,621,173 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 570 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –110,000 | ||
| Overestimation of Civilian FTE Targets | [–110,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –110,000 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 42,012,484 | 40,165,499 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 11,927 | 11,927 | |
| 020 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 533,015 | 533,015 | |
| 030 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 119,517 | 118,101 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–1,416] | |||
| 040 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 550,468 | 548,268 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–2,200] | |||
| 050 | AVIATION ASSETS | 86,670 | 85,170 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–1,500] | |||
| 060 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 390,061 | 388,661 | |
| Excess civilian increase | [–400] | |||
| Excess travel increase | [–1,000] | |||
| 070 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 101,890 | 101,890 | |
| 080 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 48,503 | 48,503 | |
| 090 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 598,907 | 598,907 | |
| 100 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 444,376 | 444,376 | |
| 110 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 22,095 | 22,095 | |
| 120 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 3,288 | 3,288 | |
| 130 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY | 7,655 | 7,655 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,918,372 | 2,911,856 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 140 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 14,533 | 14,533 | |
| 150 | ADMINISTRATION | 17,231 | 17,231 | |
| 160 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 14,304 | 14,304 | |
| 170 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 6,129 | 6,129 | |
| 180 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 58,541 | 58,541 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 110,738 | 110,738 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 3,029,110 | 3,022,594 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 805,671 | 797,671 | |
| Excess growth | [–8,000] | |||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 195,334 | 193,334 | |
| Excess growth | [–2,000] | |||
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 771,048 | 770,548 | |
| Excess growth | [–500] | |||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 94,726 | 91,826 | |
| Excess growth | [–2,900] | |||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 33,696 | 33,696 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 981,819 | 973,819 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–8,000] | |||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 743,206 | 743,206 | |
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 50,963 | 50,963 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 258,278 | 249,778 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–8,500] | |||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,153,076 | 1,121,576 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–31,500] | |||
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 1,113,475 | 1,033,475 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–80,000] | |||
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 1,001,042 | 987,042 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–14,000] | |||
| 130 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 8,448 | 8,448 | |
| 140 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY | 7,768 | 7,768 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 7,218,550 | 7,063,150 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 150 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 9,890 | 9,890 | |
| 160 | ADMINISTRATION | 71,070 | 71,070 | |
| 170 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 68,213 | 68,213 | |
| 180 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 8,628 | 8,628 | |
| 190 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 250,376 | 250,376 | |
| 200 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 2,676 | 2,676 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 410,853 | 410,853 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 7,629,403 | 7,474,003 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 5,309,109 | 5,029,734 | |
| Excess growth | [–15,000] | |||
| Projected underexecution | [–50,000] | |||
| Realignment to OCO | [–214,375] | |||
| 020 | FLEET AIR TRAINING | 2,284,828 | 2,234,828 | |
| Projected underexecution | [–50,000] | |||
| 030 | AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES | 59,299 | 59,299 | |
| 040 | AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT | 155,896 | 155,896 | |
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 719,107 | 719,107 | |
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,154,181 | 1,154,181 | |
| 070 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 60,402 | 59,202 | |
| Excess growth | [–1,200] | |||
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 1,241,421 | 1,219,421 | |
| Projected underexecution | [–22,000] | |||
| 090 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 4,097,262 | 3,596,262 | |
| Realignment to OCO | [–450,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–51,000] | |||
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 1,031,792 | 1,029,792 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–2,000] | |||
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 8,061,298 | 8,895,298 | |
| Surface ship maintenance | [161,000] | |||
| USS Boise | [310,000] | |||
| USS Columbus | [57,000] | |||
| USS Hartford | [306,000] | |||
| 120 | SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 2,073,641 | 2,066,141 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–7,500] | |||
| 130 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE | 1,378,856 | 1,378,856 | |
| 140 | SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE | 276,245 | 273,745 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–2,500] | |||
| 150 | WARFARE TACTICS | 675,209 | 675,209 | |
| 160 | OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 389,516 | 389,516 | |
| 170 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 1,536,310 | 1,526,310 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–10,000] | |||
| 180 | EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 161,579 | 161,579 | |
| 190 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS | 59,521 | 59,521 | |
| 200 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 93,978 | 93,978 | |
| 210 | MILITARY INFORMATION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 8,641 | 8,641 | |
| 220 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 496,385 | 496,385 | |
| 230 | FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE | 1,423,339 | 1,423,339 | |
| 240 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 924,069 | 895,032 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–29,037] | |||
| 250 | OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 540,210 | 540,210 | |
| 260 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | 1,131,627 | 1,081,627 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–50,000] | |||
| 270 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 3,029,634 | 2,929,634 | |
| Unexecutable growth | [–100,000] | |||
| 280 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 4,414,943 | 4,414,943 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 42,788,298 | 42,567,686 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 290 | SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE | 942,902 | 668,561 | |
| Realignment to NDSF (DoD mobilization alterations) | [–9,590] | |||
| Realignment to NDSF (LSMR maintenance) | [–264,751] | |||
| 300 | READY RESERVE FORCE | 352,044 | 0 | |
| Realignment to NDSF | [–352,044] | |||
| 310 | SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS | 427,555 | 427,555 | |
| 320 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 137,597 | 40,730 | |
| Realignment to NDSF (TAH maintenance) | [–96,867] | |||
| 330 | COAST GUARD SUPPORT | 24,604 | 24,604 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 1,884,702 | 1,161,450 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 340 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 150,765 | 150,765 | |
| 350 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 11,584 | 11,584 | |
| 360 | RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS | 159,133 | 159,133 | |
| 370 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 911,316 | 891,316 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–20,000] | |||
| 380 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 185,211 | 186,261 | |
| Program Increase: Sea Cadets | [1,050] | |||
| 390 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 267,224 | 267,224 | |
| 400 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 209,252 | 209,252 | |
| 410 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 88,902 | 88,902 | |
| 420 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 67,492 | 67,492 | |
| 430 | JUNIOR ROTC | 55,164 | 55,164 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 2,106,043 | 2,087,093 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 440 | ADMINISTRATION | 1,143,358 | 1,096,733 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–14,375] | |||
| Insufficient justification—MHA Transfer | [–25,500] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–6,750] | |||
| 450 | CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 178,342 | 175,342 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–3,000] | |||
| 460 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 418,413 | 418,413 | |
| 490 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 157,465 | 157,465 | |
| 510 | PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND PROGRAM SUPPORT | 485,397 | 485,397 | |
| 520 | ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT | 654,137 | 654,137 | |
| 530 | INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES | 718,061 | 718,061 | |
| 645 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 591,535 | 591,535 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 4,346,708 | 4,297,083 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 650 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –30,000 | ||
| Overestimation of Civilian FTE Targets | [–30,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –30,000 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 51,125,751 | 50,083,312 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 968,224 | 927,224 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–1,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–40,000] | |||
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 1,278,533 | 1,269,533 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–2,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–7,000] | |||
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 232,991 | 232,991 | |
| 040 | MARITIME PREPOSITIONING | 100,396 | 100,396 | |
| 050 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 203,580 | 201,580 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–2,000] | |||
| 060 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 1,559,034 | 1,559,034 | |
| 070 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 2,253,776 | 2,213,776 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–6,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–34,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 6,596,534 | 6,504,534 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 080 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 21,240 | 21,240 | |
| 090 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 1,168 | 1,168 | |
| 100 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 106,601 | 106,601 | |
| 110 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 49,095 | 49,095 | |
| 120 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 407,315 | 403,715 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–1,300] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–2,300] | |||
| 130 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 210,475 | 210,475 | |
| 140 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 42,810 | 42,810 | |
| 150 | JUNIOR ROTC | 25,183 | 25,183 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 863,887 | 860,287 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 160 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 29,894 | 29,894 | |
| 170 | ADMINISTRATION | 384,352 | 383,002 | |
| Excess civilian growth | [–750] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–600] | |||
| 225 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 52,057 | 52,057 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 466,303 | 464,953 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 7,926,724 | 7,829,774 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 654,220 | 639,220 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–15,000] | |||
| 020 | INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE | 8,767 | 8,767 | |
| 030 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 108,236 | 108,236 | |
| 040 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 463 | 463 | |
| 050 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 26,014 | 26,014 | |
| 060 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 583 | 583 | |
| 070 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | 17,883 | 17,883 | |
| 080 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 128,079 | 128,079 | |
| 090 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 356 | 356 | |
| 100 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | 26,133 | 26,133 | |
| 110 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 35,397 | 35,397 | |
| 120 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 101,376 | 101,376 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 1,107,507 | 1,092,507 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 130 | ADMINISTRATION | 1,888 | 1,888 | |
| 140 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 12,778 | 12,778 | |
| 150 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 2,943 | 2,943 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 17,609 | 17,609 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 1,125,116 | 1,110,116 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATING FORCES | 106,484 | 106,484 | |
| 020 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 18,429 | 18,429 | |
| 030 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 47,516 | 47,516 | |
| 040 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 106,073 | 106,073 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 278,502 | 278,502 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 050 | ADMINISTRATION | 13,574 | 13,574 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 13,574 | 13,574 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 292,076 | 292,076 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 729,127 | 727,477 | |
| Excess travel costs | [–1,650] | |||
| 020 | COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES | 1,318,770 | 1,318,770 | |
| 030 | AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) | 1,486,790 | 1,446,790 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–40,000] | |||
| 040 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 3,334,792 | 3,534,792 | |
| Readiness restoration | [200,000] | |||
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 4,142,435 | 4,142,435 | |
| 060 | CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT | 228,811 | 228,811 | |
| 070 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 8,329,364 | 8,438,364 | |
| Expansion of Conditions Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+) | [18,000] | |||
| Readiness restoration | [91,000] | |||
| 080 | FLYING HOUR PROGRAM | 4,048,773 | 3,498,773 | |
| Realignment to OCO | [–550,000] | |||
| 090 | BASE SUPPORT | 7,223,982 | 7,073,982 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–150,000] | |||
| 100 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 964,553 | 964,553 | |
| 110 | OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS | 1,032,307 | 1,026,161 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–6,146] | |||
| 120 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 670,076 | 670,076 | |
| 140 | LAUNCH FACILITIES | 179,980 | 179,980 | |
| 150 | SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 467,990 | 464,490 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–3,500] | |||
| 160 | US NORTHCOM/NORAD | 184,655 | 184,655 | |
| 170 | US STRATCOM | 478,357 | 478,357 | |
| 180 | US CYBERCOM | 323,121 | 323,121 | |
| 190 | US CENTCOM | 160,989 | 160,989 | |
| 200 | US SOCOM | 6,225 | 6,225 | |
| 210 | US TRANSCOM | 544 | 544 | |
| 220 | CENTCOM CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT | 2,073 | 2,073 | |
| 230 | USSPACECOM | 70,588 | 70,588 | |
| 235 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,322,944 | 1,322,944 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 36,707,246 | 36,264,950 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 240 | AIRLIFT OPERATIONS | 1,158,142 | 1,151,342 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–6,800] | |||
| 250 | MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS | 138,672 | 130,172 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–8,500] | |||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 1,296,814 | 1,281,514 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 260 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 130,835 | 130,835 | |
| 270 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 26,021 | 26,021 | |
| 280 | RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) | 121,391 | 121,391 | |
| 290 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 454,539 | 449,539 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–5,000] | |||
| 300 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 600,565 | 600,565 | |
| 310 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 282,788 | 282,788 | |
| 320 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 123,988 | 119,988 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–4,000] | |||
| 330 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 167,731 | 167,731 | |
| 340 | EXAMINING | 4,576 | 4,576 | |
| 350 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 211,911 | 211,911 | |
| 360 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 219,021 | 219,021 | |
| 370 | JUNIOR ROTC | 62,092 | 62,092 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 2,405,458 | 2,396,458 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 380 | LOGISTICS OPERATIONS | 664,926 | 664,926 | |
| 390 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 101,483 | 101,483 | |
| 400 | ADMINISTRATION | 892,480 | 892,480 | |
| 410 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 152,532 | 152,532 | |
| 420 | OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 1,254,089 | 1,254,089 | |
| 430 | CIVIL AIR PATROL | 30,070 | 37,200 | |
| Improved emergency crew readiness | [7,130] | |||
| 460 | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 136,110 | 136,110 | |
| 465 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,269,624 | 1,269,624 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 4,501,314 | 4,508,444 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 44,910,832 | 44,451,366 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | BASE SUPPORT | 72,436 | 15,000 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–57,436] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 72,436 | 15,000 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, SPACE FORCE | 72,436 | 15,000 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 1,781,413 | 1,739,288 | |
| Delay in KC–46 aircraft delivery | [–31,492] | |||
| Excess Growth | [–10,633] | |||
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 209,650 | 204,150 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–5,500] | |||
| 030 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 494,235 | 484,235 | |
| Excess growth | [–10,000] | |||
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 128,746 | 128,746 | |
| 050 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 256,512 | 256,512 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 414,626 | 414,626 | |
| 070 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 1,673 | 1,673 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 3,286,855 | 3,229,230 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 080 | ADMINISTRATION | 69,436 | 69,436 | |
| 090 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 22,124 | 22,124 | |
| 100 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) | 10,946 | 10,946 | |
| 110 | OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) | 7,009 | 7,009 | |
| 120 | AUDIOVISUAL | 448 | 448 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 109,963 | 109,963 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 3,396,818 | 3,339,193 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS | 2,497,967 | 2,414,000 | |
| Delay in KC–46 aircraft delivery | [–5,267] | |||
| Insufficient justification | [–78,700] | |||
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 600,377 | 585,377 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–15,000] | |||
| 030 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 879,467 | 872,467 | |
| Excess growth | [–7,000] | |||
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 400,734 | 395,134 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–5,600] | |||
| 050 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 1,299,089 | 1,290,089 | |
| Excess growth | [–9,000] | |||
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 911,775 | 901,775 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–10,000] | |||
| 070 | CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT | 24,742 | 24,742 | |
| 080 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 25,507 | 25,507 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 6,639,658 | 6,509,091 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 090 | ADMINISTRATION | 47,215 | 47,215 | |
| 100 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 40,356 | 40,356 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | 87,571 | 87,571 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 6,727,229 | 6,596,662 | ||
| OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 409,542 | 409,542 | |
| 020 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CE2T2 | 579,179 | 579,179 | |
| 030 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CYBER | 24,598 | 24,598 | |
| 040 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES | 1,075,762 | 1,075,762 | |
| 050 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 14,409 | 14,409 | |
| 060 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE | 501,747 | 486,747 | |
| Program decrease—SOCRATES | [–9,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth—DCGS | [–6,000] | |||
| 070 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE | 559,300 | 544,300 | |
| Projected underexecution | [–15,000] | |||
| 080 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 177,928 | 177,928 | |
| 090 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT | 925,262 | 899,262 | |
| Base support underexecution | [–6,000] | |||
| Operational support underexecution | [–10,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth—C4IAS Saas | [–10,000] | |||
| 100 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES | 2,764,738 | 2,724,738 | |
| Program decrease | [–55,000] | |||
| Program increase—suicide prevention | [15,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 7,032,465 | 6,936,465 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 120 | DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY | 180,250 | 180,250 | |
| 130 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 100,610 | 100,610 | |
| 140 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 33,967 | 33,967 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 314,827 | 314,827 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 160 | CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS | 165,707 | 195,707 | |
| Program increase—STARBASE | [30,000] | |||
| 180 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY | 627,467 | 627,467 | |
| 190 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY—CYBER | 3,362 | 3,362 | |
| 200 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY | 1,438,068 | 1,438,068 | |
| 210 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY—CYBER | 24,391 | 24,391 | |
| 220 | DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY | 892,438 | 898,438 | |
| Program increase—national flagship language initiative | [6,000] | |||
| 230 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 2,012,885 | 2,028,022 | |
| Realignment for Sharkseer | [35,137] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–20,000] | |||
| 240 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER | 601,223 | 601,223 | |
| 270 | DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY | 34,632 | 34,632 | |
| 280 | DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY | 415,699 | 430,199 | |
| Excess growth | [–5,000] | |||
| Program increase—PTAP | [19,500] | |||
| 290 | DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY | 202,792 | 196,792 | |
| Program decrease | [–6,000] | |||
| 300 | DEFENSE PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING AGENCY | 144,881 | 144,881 | |
| 310 | DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 696,884 | 681,884 | |
| Increase for AM&E | [11,000] | |||
| Increase for AM&E | [–11,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–15,000] | |||
| 320 | DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE | 889,664 | 889,664 | |
| 340 | DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE—CYBER | 9,220 | 9,220 | |
| 360 | DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| 370 | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | 35,626 | 35,626 | |
| 380 | DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | 568,133 | 568,133 | |
| 400 | DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY—CYBER | 13,339 | 13,339 | |
| 410 | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY | 2,932,226 | 2,982,226 | |
| Program increase—impact aid for children with severe disabilites | [10,000] | |||
| Program increase—impact aid to schools with military dependents | [40,000] | |||
| 420 | MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | 522,529 | 522,529 | |
| 450 | OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT | 59,513 | 114,913 | |
| Civilian growth | [400] | |||
| Defense Community Infrastructure Program (DCIP) | [50,000] | |||
| Program increase—military aviation noise pilot program | [5,000] | |||
| 460 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 1,604,738 | 1,529,476 | |
| Basic Needs Allowance for low-income regular members | [15,000] | |||
| Excess growth | [–58,839] | |||
| Increase to OUSD(A&S)—JASONs | [7,000] | |||
| Military aviation safety commission | [3,000] | |||
| Program decrease | [–53,000] | |||
| Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative increase | [25,000] | |||
| Reduction to OUSD(R&E)—JASONs | [–7,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–6,423] | |||
| 470 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE—CYBER | 48,783 | 48,783 | |
| 480 | SPACE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY | 44,750 | 44,750 | |
| 500 | WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES | 324,001 | 296,201 | |
| Insufficient justification | [–27,800] | |||
| 505 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 15,816,598 | 15,755,461 | |
| Classified adjustment | [–26,000] | |||
| Realignment to DISA for Sharkseer | [–35,137] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 30,132,549 | 30,118,387 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 37,479,841 | 37,369,379 | ||
| US COURT OF APPEALS FOR ARMED FORCES, DEF | ||||
| ADMINISTRATION AND ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 010 | US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE | 14,771 | 14,771 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND ASSOCIATED ACTIVITIES | 14,771 | 14,771 | ||
| TOTAL US COURT OF APPEALS FOR ARMED FORCES, DEF | 14,771 | 14,771 | ||
| DOD ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND | ||||
| ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT | ||||
| 010 | ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD | 400,000 | 375,000 | |
| Program decrease | [–25,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT | 400,000 | 375,000 | ||
| TOTAL DOD ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND | 400,000 | 375,000 | ||
| OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID | ||||
| HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE | ||||
| 010 | OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID | 108,600 | 110,800 | |
| Increase for HMA | [2,200] | |||
| SUBTOTAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE | 108,600 | 110,800 | ||
| TOTAL OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID | 108,600 | 110,800 | ||
| COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT | ||||
| COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION | ||||
| 010 | COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION | 338,700 | 338,700 | |
| SUBTOTAL COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION | 338,700 | 338,700 | ||
| TOTAL COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT | 338,700 | 338,700 | ||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY | ||||
| DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY | ||||
| 050 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY | 207,518 | 235,809 | |
| Perfluorinated chemicals | [28,291] | |||
| SUBTOTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY | 207,518 | 235,809 | ||
| TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY | 207,518 | 235,809 | ||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY | ||||
| DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | ||||
| 060 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY | 335,932 | 365,883 | |
| Perfluorinated chemicals | [29,951] | |||
| SUBTOTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | 335,932 | 365,883 | ||
| TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY | 335,932 | 365,883 | ||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE | ||||
| DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE | ||||
| 070 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE | 302,744 | 365,808 | |
| Perfluorinated chemicals | [63,064] | |||
| SUBTOTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE | 302,744 | 365,808 | ||
| TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE | 302,744 | 365,808 | ||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| 080 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE | 9,105 | 19,002 | |
| Perfluorinated chemicals | [9,897] | |||
| SUBTOTAL DEFENSE-WIDE | 9,105 | 19,002 | ||
| TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE | 9,105 | 19,002 | ||
| ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES | ||||
| DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| 090 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES | 216,499 | 216,499 | |
| SUBTOTAL DEFENSE-WIDE | 216,499 | 216,499 | ||
| TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES | 216,499 | 216,499 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 207,661,689 | 203,791,546 | ||
| SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | |
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 1,410,874 | 1,410,874 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 26,502 | 26,502 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 2,274,490 | 2,274,490 | |
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 136,288 | 136,288 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 300,240 | 300,240 | |
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 3,415,009 | 4,515,009 | |
| Realignment from base | [1,100,000] | |||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 29,985 | 29,985 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 86,931 | 86,931 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 115,706 | 115,706 | |
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 72,657 | 72,657 | |
| 130 | ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES | 6,397,586 | 6,397,586 | |
| 140 | COMMANDER'S EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM | 5,000 | 0 | |
| Realignment of redress and loss funding | [–5,000] | |||
| 150 | RESET | 1,048,896 | 1,048,896 | |
| 160 | US AFRICA COMMAND | 203,174 | 203,174 | |
| 170 | US EUROPEAN COMMAND | 173,676 | 173,676 | |
| 200 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 188,529 | 188,529 | |
| 210 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES—CYBERSECURITY | 5,682 | 5,682 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 15,891,225 | 16,986,225 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 230 | ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS | 131,954 | 131,954 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 131,954 | 131,954 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 390 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 721,014 | 721,014 | |
| 400 | CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES | 66,845 | 66,845 | |
| 410 | LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 9,309 | 9,309 | |
| 420 | AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT | 23,653 | 23,653 | |
| 460 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 109,019 | 109,019 | |
| 490 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 251,355 | 251,355 | |
| 565 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,568,564 | 1,568,564 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 2,749,759 | 2,749,759 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 18,772,938 | 19,867,938 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 20,440 | 20,440 | |
| 060 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 689 | 689 | |
| 090 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 16,463 | 16,463 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 37,592 | 37,592 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 37,592 | 37,592 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 45,896 | 45,896 | |
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 180 | 180 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 2,982 | 2,982 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 548 | 548 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 9,229 | 9,229 | |
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,584 | 1,584 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 22,063 | 22,063 | |
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 606 | 606 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 83,088 | 83,088 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 170 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 203 | 203 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 203 | 203 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 83,291 | 83,291 | ||
| AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY | ||||
| 090 | SUSTAINMENT | 1,313,047 | 1,313,047 | |
| 100 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 37,152 | 37,152 | |
| 110 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 120,868 | 120,868 | |
| 120 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 118,591 | 118,591 | |
| SUBTOTAL AFGHAN NATIONAL ARMY | 1,589,658 | 1,589,658 | ||
| AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE | ||||
| 130 | SUSTAINMENT | 422,806 | 422,806 | |
| 140 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 2,358 | 2,358 | |
| 150 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 127,081 | 127,081 | |
| 160 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 108,112 | 108,112 | |
| SUBTOTAL AFGHAN NATIONAL POLICE | 660,357 | 660,357 | ||
| AFGHAN AIR FORCE | ||||
| 170 | SUSTAINMENT | 893,829 | 893,829 | |
| 180 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 8,611 | 8,611 | |
| 190 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 566,967 | 566,967 | |
| 200 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 356,108 | 356,108 | |
| SUBTOTAL AFGHAN AIR FORCE | 1,825,515 | 1,825,515 | ||
| AFGHAN SPECIAL SECURITY FORCES | ||||
| 210 | SUSTAINMENT | 437,909 | 437,909 | |
| 220 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 21,131 | 21,131 | |
| 230 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 153,806 | 153,806 | |
| 240 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 115,602 | 115,602 | |
| SUBTOTAL AFGHAN SPECIAL SECURITY FORCES | 728,448 | 728,448 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 245 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –300,000 | ||
| Unjustified request | [–300,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –300,000 | |||
| TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND | 4,803,978 | 4,503,978 | ||
| COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) | ||||
| COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) | ||||
| 010 | IRAQ | 745,000 | 663,000 | |
| Unjustified request | [–82,000] | |||
| 020 | SYRIA | 300,000 | 300,000 | |
| 030 | BORDER SECURITY | 250,000 | ||
| Realignment of CTEF border security funding | [250,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) | 1,045,000 | 1,213,000 | ||
| TOTAL COUNTER ISIS TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND (CTEF) | 1,045,000 | 1,213,000 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 373,047 | 587,422 | |
| Realignment from base | [214,375] | |||
| 030 | AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES | 816 | 816 | |
| 040 | AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT | 9,582 | 9,582 | |
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 197,262 | 197,262 | |
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 168,246 | 168,246 | |
| 070 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 3,594 | 3,594 | |
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 10,618 | 10,618 | |
| 090 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 1,485,108 | 1,935,108 | |
| Realignment from base | [450,000] | |||
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 20,334 | 20,334 | |
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 2,365,615 | 2,365,615 | |
| 130 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE | 58,092 | 58,092 | |
| 140 | SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE | 18,000 | 18,000 | |
| 150 | WARFARE TACTICS | 16,984 | 16,984 | |
| 160 | OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 29,382 | 29,382 | |
| 170 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 608,870 | 608,870 | |
| 180 | EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 7,799 | 7,799 | |
| 200 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 24,800 | 24,800 | |
| 220 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 363 | 363 | |
| 240 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 486,188 | 486,188 | |
| 250 | OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 12,189 | 12,189 | |
| 270 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 68,667 | 68,667 | |
| 280 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 219,099 | 219,099 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 6,184,655 | 6,849,030 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 320 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 17,580 | 17,580 | |
| 330 | COAST GUARD SUPPORT | 190,000 | 190,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 207,580 | 207,580 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 370 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 52,161 | 52,161 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 52,161 | 52,161 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 440 | ADMINISTRATION | 8,475 | 8,475 | |
| 460 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 7,653 | 7,653 | |
| 490 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 70,683 | 70,683 | |
| 520 | ACQUISITION, LOGISTICS, AND OVERSIGHT | 11,130 | 11,130 | |
| 530 | INVESTIGATIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES | 1,559 | 1,559 | |
| 645 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 17,754 | 17,754 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 117,254 | 117,254 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 6,561,650 | 7,226,025 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 714,653 | 714,653 | |
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 232,508 | 232,508 | |
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 54,101 | 54,101 | |
| 050 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 2,000 | 2,000 | |
| 070 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 24,570 | 24,570 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 1,027,832 | 1,027,832 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 120 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 30,459 | 30,459 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 30,459 | 30,459 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 160 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 61,400 | 61,400 | |
| 225 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 5,100 | 5,100 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 66,500 | 66,500 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 1,124,791 | 1,124,791 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE | 510 | 510 | |
| 030 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 11,628 | 11,628 | |
| 080 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 10,898 | 10,898 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 23,036 | 23,036 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 23,036 | 23,036 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATING FORCES | 7,627 | 7,627 | |
| 040 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 1,080 | 1,080 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 8,707 | 8,707 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 8,707 | 8,707 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 163,632 | 163,632 | |
| 020 | COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES | 1,049,170 | 1,049,170 | |
| 030 | AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) | 111,808 | 111,808 | |
| 040 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 408,699 | 408,699 | |
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 147,264 | 147,264 | |
| 060 | CYBERSPACE SUSTAINMENT | 10,061 | 10,061 | |
| 070 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 953,594 | 953,594 | |
| 080 | FLYING HOUR PROGRAM | 2,495,266 | 3,045,266 | |
| Realignment from base | [550,000] | |||
| 090 | BASE SUPPORT | 1,538,120 | 1,538,120 | |
| 100 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 13,863 | 13,863 | |
| 110 | OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS | 272,020 | 272,020 | |
| 120 | CYBERSPACE ACTIVITIES | 17,657 | 17,657 | |
| 130 | TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES | 36,098 | 36,098 | |
| 140 | LAUNCH FACILITIES | 391 | 391 | |
| 150 | SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 39,990 | 39,990 | |
| 160 | US NORTHCOM/NORAD | 725 | 725 | |
| 170 | US STRATCOM | 926 | 926 | |
| 180 | US CYBERCOM | 35,189 | 35,189 | |
| 190 | US CENTCOM | 163,015 | 163,015 | |
| 200 | US SOCOM | 19,000 | 19,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 7,476,488 | 8,026,488 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 240 | AIRLIFT OPERATIONS | 1,271,439 | 1,271,439 | |
| 250 | MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS | 109,682 | 109,682 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 1,381,121 | 1,381,121 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 260 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 200 | 200 | |
| 270 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 352 | 352 | |
| 290 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 26,802 | 26,802 | |
| 300 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 844 | 844 | |
| 310 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 1,199 | 1,199 | |
| 320 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 1,320 | 1,320 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 30,717 | 30,717 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 380 | LOGISTICS OPERATIONS | 164,701 | 164,701 | |
| 390 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 11,608 | 11,608 | |
| 400 | ADMINISTRATION | 4,814 | 4,814 | |
| 410 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 145,204 | 145,204 | |
| 420 | OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 98,841 | 98,841 | |
| 460 | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 29,890 | 29,890 | |
| 465 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 52,995 | 52,995 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 508,053 | 508,053 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 9,396,379 | 9,946,379 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 030 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 24,188 | 24,188 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 5,570 | 5,570 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 29,758 | 29,758 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 29,758 | 29,758 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 3,666 | 3,666 | |
| 030 | DEPOT PURCHASE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 66,944 | 66,944 | |
| 050 | CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT AND SYSTEM SUPPORT | 93,620 | 93,620 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 12,679 | 12,679 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 176,909 | 176,909 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 176,909 | 176,909 | ||
| OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 21,866 | 21,866 | |
| 020 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF—CE2T2 | 6,634 | 6,634 | |
| 040 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND COMBAT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES | 1,121,580 | 1,121,580 | |
| 060 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND INTELLIGENCE | 1,328,201 | 1,328,201 | |
| 070 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND MAINTENANCE | 399,845 | 399,845 | |
| 090 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT | 138,458 | 102,958 | |
| Project underexecution—communications | [–35,500] | |||
| 100 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND THEATER FORCES | 808,729 | 808,729 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 3,825,313 | 3,789,813 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 180 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY | 1,810 | 1,810 | |
| 200 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY | 21,723 | 21,723 | |
| 230 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 81,133 | 81,133 | |
| 240 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY—CYBER | 3,455 | 3,455 | |
| 270 | DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY | 196,124 | 196,124 | |
| 290 | DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY | 14,377 | 14,377 | |
| 310 | DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 1,927,217 | 1,364,427 | |
| Realignment of CTEF border security funding | [–250,000] | |||
| Transfer of funds to Ukraine Security Assistance | [–250,000] | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–62,790] | |||
| 380 | DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | 317,558 | 307,558 | |
| Program decrease | [–10,000] | |||
| 410 | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY | 31,620 | 31,620 | |
| 460 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 16,666 | 21,666 | |
| Realignment of redress and loss funding | [5,000] | |||
| 500 | WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES | 6,331 | 6,331 | |
| 505 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,924,785 | 1,924,785 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 4,542,799 | 3,975,009 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 8,368,112 | 7,764,822 | ||
| UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE | ||||
| UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE | ||||
| 010 | UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE | 250,000 | ||
| Transfer of funds from Defense Security Cooperation Agency | [250,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE | 250,000 | |||
| TOTAL UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE | 250,000 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 50,432,141 | 52,256,226 | ||
| SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | |
| Military Personnel Appropriations | 143,476,503 | 142,248,503 | |
| Historical unobligated balances | [–1,228,000] | ||
| Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions | 7,816,815 | 7,816,815 | |
| SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | |||
| INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS | 57,467 | 57,467 | |
| SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY | 32,130 | 32,130 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | 89,597 | 89,597 | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | |||
| TRANSPORTATION | |||
| SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS | 92,499 | 92,499 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | 92,499 | 92,499 | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||
| SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT—DEF | 49,085 | 49,085 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | 49,085 | 49,085 | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | |||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | 995,030 | 995,030 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | 995,030 | 995,030 | |
| NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND | |||
| LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE | 264,751 | ||
| Realignment from Operations and Maintenance, Navy | [264,751] | ||
| DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS | 9,590 | ||
| Realignment from Operations and Maintenance, Navy | [9,590] | ||
| TAH MAINTENANCE | 96,867 | ||
| Realignment from Operations and Maintenance, Navy | [96,867] | ||
| READY RESERVE FORCE | 352,044 | ||
| Realignment from Operations and Maintenance, Navy | [352,044] | ||
| TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND | 723,252 | ||
| WCF, DEF COUNTERINTELLIGENCE & SECURITY AGENCY | |||
| DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY | 200,000 | 200,000 | |
| TOTAL WCF, DEF COUNTERINTELLIGENCE & SECURITY AGENCY | 200,000 | 200,000 | |
| CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION | |||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 107,351 | 107,351 | |
| RDT&E | 875,930 | 865,930 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–10,000] | ||
| PROCUREMENT | 2,218 | 2,218 | |
| TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION | 985,499 | 975,499 | |
| DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | |||
| COUNTER-NARCOTICS SUPPORT | 581,739 | 517,171 | |
| Realignment of National Guard Bureau funding | [–30,921] | ||
| Unjustified growth | [–33,647] | ||
| DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM | 120,922 | 120,922 | |
| NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG PROGRAM | 91,370 | 122,291 | |
| Realignment of National Guard Bureau funding | [30,921] | ||
| NATIONAL GUARD COUNTER-DRUG SCHOOLS | 5,371 | 5,371 | |
| TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | 799,402 | 765,755 | |
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | |||
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 359,022 | 359,022 | |
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL—CYBER | 1,179 | 1,179 | |
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 2,965 | 2,965 | |
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 333 | 333 | |
| TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 363,499 | 363,499 | |
| DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | |||
| IN-HOUSE CARE | 9,570,615 | 9,470,615 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–100,000] | ||
| PRIVATE SECTOR CARE | 15,041,006 | 15,041,006 | |
| CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT | 1,975,536 | 1,975,536 | |
| INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | 2,004,588 | 2,004,588 | |
| MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES | 333,246 | 333,246 | |
| EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 793,810 | 793,810 | |
| BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS | 2,093,289 | 2,093,289 | |
| UNDISTRIBUTED | 7,000 | ||
| PFAS exposure blood testing for DoD firefighters | [2,000] | ||
| TRICARE lead level screening and testing for children | [5,000] | ||
| R&D RESEARCH | 12,621 | 22,621 | |
| CDC ASTDR PFOS/PFOA health study increment | [10,000] | ||
| R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT | 84,266 | 84,266 | |
| R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 279,766 | 279,766 | |
| R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION | 128,055 | 128,055 | |
| R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | 143,527 | 158,527 | |
| Deployment of mTBI/concussion multi-modal devices | [10,000] | ||
| Program increase—freeze dried platelets | [5,000] | ||
| R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT | 67,219 | 67,219 | |
| R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT | 16,819 | 16,819 | |
| PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING | 26,135 | 26,135 | |
| PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION | 225,774 | 225,774 | |
| PROC JOINT OPERATIONAL MEDICINE INFORMATION SYSTEM | 314 | 314 | |
| PROC MILITARY HEALTH SYSTEM—DESKTOP TO DATACENTER | 73,010 | 73,010 | |
| PROC DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION | 129,091 | 129,091 | |
| TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | 32,998,687 | 32,930,687 | |
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 36,573,298 | 37,184,903 | |
| SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | |||
| INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS | |||
| SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY | 20,100 | 20,100 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | 20,100 | 20,100 | |
| DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | |||
| COUNTER-NARCOTICS SUPPORT | 163,596 | 153,100 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–10,496] | ||
| TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | 163,596 | 153,100 | |
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | |||
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 24,254 | 24,254 | |
| TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 24,254 | 24,254 | |
| DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | |||
| IN-HOUSE CARE | 57,459 | 57,459 | |
| PRIVATE SECTOR CARE | 287,487 | 287,487 | |
| CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT | 2,800 | 2,800 | |
| TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | 347,746 | 347,746 | |
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 555,696 | 545,200 | |
| SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||
| Account | State/Country and Installation | Project Title | FY 2020 Request | House Agreement | ||
| Alabama | ||||||
| Army | Redstone Arsenal | Aircraft and Flight Equipment Building | 38,000 | 38,000 | ||
| Colorado | ||||||
| Army | Fort Carson | Company Operations Facility | 71,000 | 71,000 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| Army | Fort Gordon | Cyber Instructional Fac (Admin/Command) | 107,000 | 70,000 | ||
| Army | Hunter Army Airfield | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | 62,000 | 62,000 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Army | Fort Shafter | Command and Control Facility, Incr 5 | 60,000 | 60,000 | ||
| Honduras | ||||||
| Army | Soto Cano Air Base | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | 34,000 | 34,000 | ||
| Kentucky | ||||||
| Army | Fort Campbell | Automated Infantry Platoon Battle Course | 7,100 | 7,100 | ||
| Army | Fort Campbell | Easements | 3,200 | 3,200 | ||
| Army | Fort Campbell | General Purpose Maintenance Shop | 51,000 | 51,000 | ||
| Kwajalein | ||||||
| Army | Kwajalein Atoll | Air Traffic Control Tower and Terminal | 0 | 40,000 | ||
| Massachusetts | ||||||
| Army | U.S. Army Natick Soldier Systems Center | Human Engineering Lab | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||
| Michigan | ||||||
| Army | Detroit Arsenal | Substation | 24,000 | 24,000 | ||
| New York | ||||||
| Army | Fort Drum | Railhead | 0 | 21,000 | ||
| Army | Fort Drum | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar | 23,000 | 23,000 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Army | Fort Bragg | Dining Facility | 12,500 | 12,500 | ||
| Oklahoma | ||||||
| Army | Fort Sill | Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph2 | 73,000 | 73,000 | ||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||
| Army | Carlisle Barracks | General Instruction Building | 98,000 | 60,000 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| Army | Fort Jackson | Reception Complex, Ph2 | 54,000 | 54,000 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| Army | Corpus Christi Army Depot | Powertrain Facility (Machine Shop) | 86,000 | 40,000 | ||
| Army | Fort Hood | Barracks | 32,000 | 32,000 | ||
| Army | Fort Hood | Vehicle Bridge | 0 | 18,500 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Army | Fort Belvoir | Secure Operations and Admin Facility | 60,000 | 60,000 | ||
| Army | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | Adv Individual Training Barracks Cplx, Ph4 | 55,000 | 55,000 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| Army | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | Information Systems Facility | 46,000 | 46,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Host Nation Support | 31,000 | 31,000 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 94,099 | 105,099 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 70,600 | 70,600 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Worldwide Construction | 211,000 | 0 | ||
| Arizona | ||||||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Yuma | Bachelor Enlisted Quarters | 0 | 99,600 | ||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Yuma | Hangar 95 Renovation & Addition | 90,160 | 90,160 | ||
| Bahrain Island | ||||||
| Navy | SW Asia | Electrical System Upgrade | 53,360 | 0 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Navy | Camp Pendleton | 62 Area Mess Hall and Consolidated Warehouse | 71,700 | 71,700 | ||
| Navy | Camp Pendleton | I MEF Consolidated Information Center | 113,869 | 63,869 | ||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Miramar | Child Development Center | 0 | 37,400 | ||
| Navy | Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake | Runway & Taxiway Extension | 64,500 | 64,500 | ||
| Navy | Naval Base Coronado | Aircraft Paint Complex | 0 | 79,000 | ||
| Navy | Naval Base Coronado | Navy V–22 Hangar | 86,830 | 86,830 | ||
| Navy | Naval Base San Diego | Pier 8 Replacement (Inc) | 59,353 | 59,353 | ||
| Navy | Naval Base San Diego | PMO Facility Repair | 0 | 9,900 | ||
| Navy | Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach | Ammunition Pier | 95,310 | 60,310 | ||
| Navy | Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach | Missile Magazine | 0 | 28,000 | ||
| Navy | Travis Air Force Base | Alert Force Complex | 64,000 | 64,000 | ||
| Connecticut | ||||||
| Navy | Naval Submarine Base New London | SSN Berthing Pier 32 | 72,260 | 72,260 | ||
| District of Columbia | ||||||
| Navy | Naval Observatory | Master Time Clocks & Operations Fac (Inc) | 75,600 | 0 | ||
| Florida | ||||||
| Navy | Blount Island | Police Station and EOC Facility | 0 | 18,700 | ||
| Navy | Naval Air Station Jacksonville | Targeting & Surveillance Syst Prod Supp Fac | 32,420 | 32,420 | ||
| Guam | ||||||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Bachelor Enlisted Quarters H | 164,100 | 64,100 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | EOD Compound Facilities | 61,900 | 61,900 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Machine Gun Range (Inc) | 91,287 | 91,287 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Kaneohe Bay | Bachelor Enlisted Quarters | 134,050 | 134,050 | ||
| Navy | Naval Ammunition Depot West Loch | Magazine Consolidation, Phase 1 | 53,790 | 53,790 | ||
| Italy | ||||||
| Navy | Naval Air Station Sigonella | Communications Station | 77,400 | 0 | ||
| Japan | ||||||
| Navy | Fleet Activities Yokosuka | Pier 5 (Berths 2 and 3) | 174,692 | 100,000 | ||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni | VTOL Pad—South | 15,870 | 15,870 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Navy | Saint Inigoes | Air Traffic Control Tower | 0 | 15,000 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Navy | Camp Lejeune | 10th Marines Himars Complex | 35,110 | 35,110 | ||
| Navy | Camp Lejeune | 2nd MARDIV/2nd MLG Ops Center Replacement | 60,130 | 60,130 | ||
| Navy | Camp Lejeune | 2nd Radio BN Complex, Phase 2 (Inc) | 25,650 | 25,650 | ||
| Navy | Camp Lejeune | ACV-AAV Maintenance Facility Upgrades | 11,570 | 0 | ||
| Navy | Camp Lejeune | II MEF Operations Center Replacement | 122,200 | 62,200 | ||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar (Inc) | 73,970 | 73,970 | ||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point | ATC Tower & Airfield Operations | 61,340 | 61,340 | ||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point | F–35 Training and Simulator Facility | 53,230 | 53,230 | ||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point | Flightline Utility Modernization (Inc) | 51,860 | 51,860 | ||
| Navy | Marine Corps Air Station New River | CH–53K Cargo Loading Trainer | 11,320 | 11,320 | ||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||
| Navy | Philadelphia | Machinery Control Development Center | 0 | 66,000 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| Navy | Parris Island | Range Improvements & Modernization Phase 3 | 0 | 37,200 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| Navy | Hill Air Force Base | D5 Missile Motor Receipt/Storage Fac (Inc) | 50,520 | 50,520 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Navy | Marine Corps Base Quantico | Wargaming Center | 143,350 | 70,000 | ||
| Navy | Naval Station Norfolk | Mariner Skills Training Center | 79,100 | 79,100 | ||
| Navy | Naval Station Norfolk | MH–60 & CMV–22B Corrison Control and Paint Facility | 0 | 49,000 | ||
| Navy | Portsmouth Naval Shipyard | Dry Dock Flood Protection Improvements | 48,930 | 48,930 | ||
| Navy | Yorktown Naval Weapons Station | NMC Ordnance Facilities Recapitalization Phase 1 | 0 | 59,000 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| Navy | Bremerton | Dry Dock 4 & Pier 3 Modernization | 51,010 | 51,010 | ||
| Navy | Keyport | Undersea Vehicle Maintenance Facility | 25,050 | 25,050 | ||
| Navy | Naval Base Kitsap | Seawolf Service Pier Cost-to-Complete | 0 | 48,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 167,715 | 178,715 | ||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 81,237 | 81,237 | ||
| Alaska | ||||||
| AF | Eielson Air Force Base | F–35 AME Storage Facility | 8,600 | 8,600 | ||
| Arkansas | ||||||
| AF | Little Rock Air Force Base | C–130H/J Fuselage Trainer Facility | 47,000 | 47,000 | ||
| AF | Little Rock Air Force Base | Dormitory Cost-to-Complete | 0 | 7,000 | ||
| Australia | ||||||
| AF | Tindal | APR—RAAF Tindal/Earth Covered Magazine | 11,600 | 11,600 | ||
| AF | Tindal | APR-RAAF Tindal/Bulk Storage Tanks | 59,000 | 59,000 | ||
| California | ||||||
| AF | Travis Air Force Base | KC–46A Alter B181/B185/B187 Squad Ops/AMU | 6,600 | 6,600 | ||
| AF | Travis Air Force Base | KC–46A Regional Maintenance Training Facility | 19,500 | 19,500 | ||
| AF | Travis Air Force Base | MMHAS Aiiied Support | 0 | 17,000 | ||
| Colorado | ||||||
| AF | Peterson Air Force Base | Sconorth Theater Operational Support Facility | 0 | 54,000 | ||
| AF | Schriever Air Force Base | Consolidated Space Operations Facility | 148,000 | 74,000 | ||
| AF | United States Air Force Academy | Consolidate Cadet Prep School Dormitory | 0 | 49,000 | ||
| Cyprus | ||||||
| AF | Royal Air Force Akrotiri | New Dormitory for 1 ERS | 27,000 | 27,000 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| AF | Moody Air Force Base | 41 RQS HH–60W Apron | 0 | 12,500 | ||
| Guam | ||||||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | Munitions Storage Igloos III | 65,000 | 65,000 | ||
| Illinois | ||||||
| AF | Scott Air Force Base | Joint Operations & Mission Planning Center | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||
| Japan | ||||||
| AF | Yokota Air Base | Fuel Receipt & Distribution Upgrade | 12,400 | 12,400 | ||
| Jordan | ||||||
| AF | Azraq | Air Traffic Control Tower | 24,000 | 0 | ||
| AF | Azraq | Munitions Storage Area | 42,000 | 0 | ||
| Mariana Islands | ||||||
| AF | Tinian | Airfield Development Phase 1 | 109,000 | 25,000 | ||
| AF | Tinian | Fuel Tanks W/ Pipeline/Hydrant System | 109,000 | 25,000 | ||
| AF | Tinian | Parking Apron | 98,000 | 25,000 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| AF | Joint Base Andrews | Presidential Aircraft Recap Complex Inc 3 | 86,000 | 86,000 | ||
| Massachusetts | ||||||
| AF | Hanscom Air Force Base | MIT-Lincoln Lab (West Lab CSL/MIF) Inc 2 | 135,000 | 100,000 | ||
| Missouri | ||||||
| AF | Whiteman Air Force Base | Consolidated Vehicle Ops and MX Facility | 0 | 27,000 | ||
| Montana | ||||||
| AF | Malmstrom Air Force Base | Weapons Storage and Maintenance Facility | 235,000 | 117,500 | ||
| Nevada | ||||||
| AF | Nellis Air Force Base | 365th ISR Group Facility | 57,000 | 57,000 | ||
| AF | Nellis Air Force Base | F–35 Munitions Maintenance Facilities Cost-to-Complete | 0 | 3,100 | ||
| AF | Nellis Air Force Base | F–35A Munitions Assembly Conveyor Facility | 8,200 | 8,200 | ||
| New Mexico | ||||||
| AF | Holloman Air Force Base | NC3 Support Wrm Storage/Shipping Facility | 0 | 20,000 | ||
| AF | Kirtland Air Force Base | Combat Rescue Helicopter Simulator (CRH) ADAL | 15,500 | 15,500 | ||
| AF | Kirtland Air Force Base | UH–1 Replacement Facility | 22,400 | 22,400 | ||
| North Dakota | ||||||
| AF | Minot Air Force Base | Helo/TRFOps/AMUfacility | 5,500 | 5,500 | ||
| Ohio | ||||||
| AF | Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | ADAL Intelligence Prod. Complex (NASIC) Inc 2 | 120,900 | 120,900 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| AF | Joint Base San Antonio | Aquatics Tank | 69,000 | 69,000 | ||
| AF | Joint Base San Antonio | BMT Recruit Dormitory 8 | 110,000 | 110,000 | ||
| AF | Joint Base San Antonio | T-XA DAL Ground Based Trng Sys (GBTS) Sim | 9,300 | 9,300 | ||
| AF | Joint Base San Antonio | T-XMX Trng Sys Centrailized Trng Fac | 19,000 | 19,000 | ||
| AF | Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph | AFPC B-Wing | 0 | 36,000 | ||
| United Kingdom | ||||||
| AF | Royal Air Force Lakenheath | F–35A PGM Facility | 14,300 | 14,300 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| AF | Hill Air Force Base | GBSD Mission Integration Facility | 108,000 | 40,000 | ||
| AF | Hill Air Force Base | Joint Advanced Tactical Missile Storage Fac | 6,500 | 6,500 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| AF | Fairchild Air Force Base | Consolidated TFI Base Operations | 31,000 | 31,000 | ||
| AF | Fairchild Air Force Base | SERE Pipeline Dormitory Cost-to-Complete | 0 | 4,800 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 142,148 | 153,148 | ||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 79,682 | 79,682 | ||
| Wyoming | ||||||
| AF | F. E. Warren Air Force Base | Consolidated Helo/TRF Ops/AMU and Alert Fac | 18,100 | 18,100 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Beale Air Force Base | Hydrant Fuel System Replacement | 33,700 | 33,700 | ||
| Def-Wide | Camp Pendleton | Ambul Care Center/Dental Clinic Replacement | 17,700 | 17,700 | ||
| Conus Classified | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Classified Location | Battalion Complex, Ph 3 | 82,200 | 82,200 | ||
| Florida | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Eglin Air Force Base | SOF Combined Squadron Ops Facility | 16,500 | 16,500 | ||
| Def-Wide | Hurlburt Field | SOF AMU & Weapons Hangar | 72,923 | 72,923 | ||
| Def-Wide | Hurlburt Field | SOF Combined Squadron Operations Facility | 16,513 | 16,513 | ||
| Def-Wide | Hurlburt Field | SOF Maintenance Training Facility | 18,950 | 18,950 | ||
| Def-Wide | Naval Air Station Key West | SOF Watercraft Maintenance Facility | 16,000 | 16,000 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Geilenkirchen Air Base | Ambulatory Care Center/Dental Clinic | 30,479 | 30,479 | ||
| Guam | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Region Marianas | Xray Wharf Refueling Facility | 19,200 | 19,200 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | SOF Undersea Operational Training Facility | 67,700 | 67,700 | ||
| Japan | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Yokosuka | Kinnick High School Inc 2 | 130,386 | 0 | ||
| Def-Wide | Yokota Air Base | Bulk Storage Tanks PH1 | 116,305 | 20,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Yokota Air Base | Pacific East District Superintendent's Office | 20,106 | 20,106 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Bethesda Naval Hospital | MEDCEN Addition/Altertion Incr 3 | 96,900 | 33,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Detrick | Medical Research Acquisition Building | 27,846 | 27,846 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Meade | NSAW Recapitalize Building #3 Inc 2 | 426,000 | 426,000 | ||
| Mississippi | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Columbus Air Force Base | Fuel Facilities Replacement | 16,800 | 16,800 | ||
| Missouri | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Leonard Wood | Hospital Replacement Incr 2 | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | St. Louis | Next NGA West (N2W) Complex Phase 2 Inc. 2 | 218,800 | 118,800 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Camp Lejeune | SOF Marine Raider Regiment HQ | 13,400 | 13,400 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Assessment and Selection Training Complex | 12,103 | 12,103 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Human Platform-Force Generation Facility | 43,000 | 43,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Operations Support Bldg | 29,000 | 29,000 | ||
| Oklahoma | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Tulsa IAP | Fuels Storage Complex | 18,900 | 18,900 | ||
| Rhode Island | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Quonset State Airport | Fuels Storage Complex Replacement | 11,600 | 11,600 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Charleston | Medical Consolidated Storage & Distrib Center | 33,300 | 33,300 | ||
| South Dakota | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Ellsworth Air Force Base | Hydrant Fuel System Replacement | 24,800 | 24,800 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Defense Distribution Depot Richmond | Operations Center Phase 2 | 98,800 | 33,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Fort Story | SOF NSWG–10 Operations Support Facility | 32,600 | 32,600 | ||
| Def-Wide | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Fort Story | SOF NSWG2 JSOTF Ops Training Facility | 13,004 | 13,004 | ||
| Def-Wide | Pentagon | Backup Generator | 8,670 | 8,670 | ||
| Def-Wide | Pentagon | Control Tower & Fire Day Station | 20,132 | 20,132 | ||
| Def-Wide | Training Center Dam Neck | SOF Demolition Training Compound Expansion | 12,770 | 12,770 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | SOF 22 STS Operations Facility | 47,700 | 47,700 | ||
| Wisconsin | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Gen Mitchell IAP | POL Facilities Replacement | 25,900 | 25,900 | ||
| Worldwide Classified | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Classified Location | Mission Support Compound | 52,000 | 0 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Contingency Construction | 10,000 | 0 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Energy Resilience and Conserv. Invest. Prog. | 150,000 | 190,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ERCIP Design | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Exercise Related Minor Construction | 11,770 | 11,770 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 99,441 | 99,441 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 60,642 | 60,642 | ||
| Def-Wide | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 142,914 | 142,914 | ||
| Def-Wide | Various Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 26,736 | 26,736 | ||
| NATO | NATO Security Investment Program | NATO Security Investment Program | 144,040 | 172,005 | ||
| Alabama | ||||||
| Army NG | Anniston Army Depot | Enlisted Transient Barracks | 0 | 34,000 | ||
| Army NG | Foley | National Guard Readiness Center | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Army NG | Camp Roberts | Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||
| Idaho | ||||||
| Army NG | Orchard Combat Training Center | Railroad Tracks | 29,000 | 29,000 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Army NG | Havre de Grace | Combined Support Maintenance Shop | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||
| Massachusetts | ||||||
| Army NG | Camp Edwards | Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range | 9,700 | 9,700 | ||
| Minnesota | ||||||
| Army NG | New Ulm | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 11,200 | 11,200 | ||
| Mississippi | ||||||
| Army NG | Camp Shelby | Automated Multipurpose Machine Gun Range | 8,100 | 8,100 | ||
| Missouri | ||||||
| Army NG | Springfield | National Guard Readiness Center | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||
| Nebraska | ||||||
| Army NG | Bellevue | National Guard Readiness Center | 29,000 | 29,000 | ||
| New Hampshire | ||||||
| Army NG | Concord | National Guard Readiness Center | 5,950 | 5,950 | ||
| New York | ||||||
| Army NG | Jamaica Armory | National Guard Readiness Center | 0 | 91,000 | ||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||
| Army NG | Moon Township | Combined Support Maintenance Shop | 23,000 | 23,000 | ||
| Vermont | ||||||
| Army NG | Jericho | General Instruction Builiding | 0 | 30,000 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| Army NG | Richland | National Guard Readiness Center | 11,400 | 11,400 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army NG | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 20,469 | 20,469 | ||
| Army NG | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| Delaware | ||||||
| Army Res | Newark | Army Reserve Center/BMA | 21,000 | 21,000 | ||
| Wisconsin | ||||||
| Army Res | Fort McCoy | Transient Training Barracks | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||
| Army Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 8,928 | 8,928 | ||
| Louisiana | ||||||
| N/MC Res | New Orleans | Entry Control Facility Upgrades | 25,260 | 25,260 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| N/MC Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 4,780 | 4,780 | ||
| N/MC Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 24,915 | 24,915 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Air NG | Moffett Air National Guard Base | Fuels/Corrosion Control Hanger and Shops | 0 | 57,000 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| Air NG | Savannah/Hilton Head IAP | Consolidated Joint Air Dominance Hangar/Shops | 24,000 | 24,000 | ||
| Missouri | ||||||
| Air NG | Rosecrans Memorial Airport | C–130 Flight Simulator Facility | 9,500 | 9,500 | ||
| Puerto Rico | ||||||
| Air NG | Luis Munoz-Marin IAP | Communications Facility | 12,500 | 0 | ||
| Air NG | Luis Munoz-Marin IAP | Maintenance Hangar | 37,500 | 0 | ||
| Wisconsin | ||||||
| Air NG | Truax Field | F–35 Simulator Facility | 14,000 | 14,000 | ||
| Air NG | Truax Field | Fighter Alert Shelters | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Air NG | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 31,471 | 31,471 | ||
| Air NG | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 17,000 | 17,000 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| AF Res | Robins Air Force Base | Consolidated Misssion Complex Phase 3 | 43,000 | 43,000 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| AF Res | Joint Base Andrews | AES Training Admin Facility | 0 | 15,000 | ||
| Minnesota | ||||||
| AF Res | Minneapolis-St. Paul IAP | Aerial Port Facility | 0 | 9,800 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| AF Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 4,604 | 4,604 | ||
| AF Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 12,146 | 12,146 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| FH Con Army | Baumholder | Family Housing Improvements | 29,983 | 29,983 | ||
| Korea | ||||||
| FH Con Army | Camp Humphreys | Family Housing New Construction Incr 4 | 83,167 | 83,167 | ||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||
| FH Con Army | Tobyhanna Army Depot | Family Housing Replacement Construction | 19,000 | 19,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Con Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Family Housing P & D | 9,222 | 9,222 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 24,027 | 24,027 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privatization Support | 18,627 | 68,627 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 128,938 | 128,938 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 81,065 | 81,065 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 38,898 | 38,898 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 484 | 484 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 10,156 | 10,156 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 55,712 | 55,712 | ||
| FH Con Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Construction Improvements | 41,798 | 41,798 | ||
| FH Con Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 3,863 | 3,863 | ||
| FH Con Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | USMC DPRI/Guam Planning and Design | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 19,009 | 19,009 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privatization Support | 21,975 | 81,575 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 64,126 | 64,126 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 82,611 | 82,611 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 50,122 | 50,122 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 151 | 151 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 16,647 | 16,647 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 63,229 | 63,229 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| FH Con AF | Spangdahlem Air Base | Construct Deficit Military Family Housing | 53,584 | 53,584 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Con AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Construction Improvements | 46,638 | 46,638 | ||
| FH Con AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 3,409 | 3,409 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 30,283 | 30,283 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privatization | 22,593 | 53,793 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 15,768 | 15,768 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 117,704 | 117,704 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 56,022 | 56,022 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 2,144 | 2,144 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 7,770 | 7,770 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 42,732 | 42,732 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 727 | 727 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 52,128 | 52,128 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 32 | 32 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 4,113 | 4,113 | ||
| FHIF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Administrative Expenses—FHIF | 3,045 | 3,045 | ||
| UHIF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Administrative Expenses—UHIF | 500 | 500 | ||
| BRAC | Worldwide Unspecified Locations | Base Realignment and Closure | 66,111 | 96,111 | ||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Base Realignment & Closure | 158,349 | 218,349 | ||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DoD BRAC Activities—Air Force | 54,066 | 84,066 | ||
| Prior Year Savings | ||||||
| PYS | Prior Year Savings | Prior Year Savings | 0 | –45,055 | ||
| SEC. 4602. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||
| Account | State/Country and Installation | Project Title | FY 2020 Request | House Agreement | ||
| Guantanamo Bay, Cuba | ||||||
| Army | Guantanamo Bay Naval Station | OCO: Communications Facility | 22,000 | 22,000 | ||
| Army | Guantanamo Bay Naval Station | OCO: Detention Legal Office and Comms Ctr | 11,800 | 11,800 | ||
| Army | Guantanamo Bay Naval Station | OCO: High Value Detention Facility | 88,500 | 0 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI/OCO Planning and Design | 19,498 | 19,498 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI: Bulk Fuel Storage | 36,000 | 36,000 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI: Information Systems Facility | 6,200 | 6,200 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI: Minor Construction | 5,220 | 5,220 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Worldwide Construction | 9,200,000 | 0 | ||
| Army | Various Worldwide Locations | EDI: Various Worldwide Locations Europe | 0 | 56,142 | ||
| Bahrain | ||||||
| Navy | SW Asia | Electrical System Upgrade | 0 | 53,360 | ||
| Italy | ||||||
| Navy | Sigonella | Communications Station | 0 | 77,400 | ||
| Spain | ||||||
| Navy | Rota | EDI: In-Transit Munitions Facility | 9,960 | 9,960 | ||
| Navy | Rota | EDI: Joint Mobility Center | 46,840 | 46,840 | ||
| Navy | Rota | EDI: Small Craft Berthing Facility | 12,770 | 12,770 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||
| Navy | Various Worldwide Locations | EDI: Various Worldwide Locations Europe | 0 | 56,246 | ||
| Iceland | ||||||
| AF | Keflavik | EDI-Airfield Upgrades—Dangerous Cargo Pad | 18,000 | 18,000 | ||
| AF | Keflavik | EDI-Beddown Site Prep | 7,000 | 7,000 | ||
| AF | Keflavik | EDI-Expand Parking Apron | 32,000 | 32,000 | ||
| Jordan | ||||||
| AF | Azraq | Air Traffic Control Tower | 0 | 24,000 | ||
| AF | Azraq | Munitions Storage Area | 0 | 42,000 | ||
| Spain | ||||||
| AF | Moron | EDI-Hot Cargo Pad | 8,500 | 8,500 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI-ECAOS DABS/FEV EMEDS Storage | 107,000 | 107,000 | ||
| AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI-Hot Cargo Pad | 29,000 | 29,000 | ||
| AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | EDI-Munitions Storage Area | 39,000 | 39,000 | ||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | EDI: Various Worldwide Locations Europe | 0 | 56,246 | ||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | EDI-P&D | 61,438 | 61,438 | ||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | EDI-UMMC | 12,800 | 12,800 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Gemersheim | EDI: Logistics Distribution Center Annex | 46,000 | 46,000 | ||
| SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Program | FY 2020 Request | House Authorized | |
| Discretionary Summary By Appropriation | |||
| Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies | |||
| Appropriation Summary: | |||
| Energy Programs | |||
| Nuclear Energy | 137,808 | 137,808 | |
| Atomic Energy Defense Activities | |||
| National nuclear security administration: | |||
| Weapons activities | 12,408,603 | 11,807,074 | |
| Defense nuclear nonproliferation | 1,993,302 | 2,005,087 | |
| Naval reactors | 1,648,396 | 1,632,142 | |
| Federal salaries and expenses | 434,699 | 410,000 | |
| Total, National nuclear security administration | 16,485,000 | 15,854,303 | |
| Environmental and other defense activities: | |||
| Defense environmental cleanup | 5,506,501 | 5,616,001 | |
| Other defense activities | 1,035,339 | 1,035,339 | |
| Defense nuclear waste disposal | 26,000 | 0 | |
| Total, Environmental & other defense activities | 6,567,840 | 6,651,340 | |
| Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities | 23,052,840 | 22,505,643 | |
| Total, Discretionary Funding | 23,190,648 | 22,643,451 | |
| Nuclear Energy | |||
| Idaho sitewide safeguards and security | 137,808 | 137,808 | |
| Total, Nuclear Energy | 137,808 | 137,808 | |
| Weapons Activities | |||
| Directed stockpile work | |||
| Life extension programs and major alterations | |||
| B61–12 Life extension program | 792,611 | 792,611 | |
| W76–2 Modification program | 10,000 | 0 | |
| Terminate effort | [–10,000] | ||
| W88 Alt 370 | 304,186 | 304,186 | |
| W80–4 Life extension program | 898,551 | 898,551 | |
| W87–1 Modification Program (formerly IW1) | 112,011 | 53,000 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–59,011] | ||
| Total, Life extension programs and major alterations | 2,117,359 | 2,048,348 | |
| Stockpile systems | |||
| B61 Stockpile systems | 71,232 | 71,232 | |
| W76 Stockpile systems | 89,804 | 89,804 | |
| W78 Stockpile systems | 81,299 | 81,299 | |
| W80 Stockpile systems | 85,811 | 80,204 | |
| Unjustified study requirement | [–5,607] | ||
| B83 Stockpile systems | 51,543 | 22,421 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–29,122] | ||
| W87 Stockpile systems | 98,262 | 98,262 | |
| W88 Stockpile systems | 157,815 | 157,815 | |
| Total, Stockpile systems | 635,766 | 601,037 | |
| Weapons dismantlement and disposition | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 47,500 | 47,500 | |
| Stockpile services | |||
| Production support | 543,964 | 510,000 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–33,964] | ||
| Research and development support | 39,339 | 36,150 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–3,189] | ||
| R&D certification and safety | 236,235 | 201,840 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–34,395] | ||
| Management, technology, and production | 305,000 | 305,000 | |
| Total, Stockpile services | 1,124,538 | 1,052,990 | |
| Strategic materials | |||
| Uranium sustainment | 94,146 | 94,146 | |
| Plutonium sustainment | 712,440 | 471,309 | |
| Pit production beyond 30 pits per year | [–241,131] | ||
| Tritium sustainment | 269,000 | 269,000 | |
| Lithium sustainment | 28,800 | 28,800 | |
| Domestic uranium enrichment | 140,000 | 140,000 | |
| Strategic materials sustainment | 256,808 | 256,808 | |
| Total, Strategic materials | 1,501,194 | 1,260,063 | |
| Total, Directed stockpile work | 5,426,357 | 5,009,938 | |
| Research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) | |||
| Science | |||
| Advanced certification | 57,710 | 57,710 | |
| Primary assessment technologies | 95,169 | 95,169 | |
| Dynamic materials properties | 133,800 | 133,800 | |
| Advanced radiography | 32,544 | 32,544 | |
| Secondary assessment technologies | 77,553 | 77,553 | |
| Academic alliances and partnerships | 44,625 | 44,625 | |
| Enhanced Capabilities for Subcritical Experiments | 145,160 | 145,160 | |
| Total, Science | 586,561 | 586,561 | |
| Engineering | |||
| Enhanced surety | 46,500 | 39,717 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–6,783] | ||
| Delivery Environments (formerly Weapons Systems Engineering Assessment Technology) | 35,945 | 23,029 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–12,916] | ||
| Nuclear survivability | 53,932 | 53,932 | |
| Enhanced surveillance | 57,747 | 57,747 | |
| Stockpile Responsiveness | 39,830 | 5,000 | |
| Unjustified request | [–34,830] | ||
| Total, Engineering | 233,954 | 179,425 | |
| Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield | |||
| Ignition and Other Stockpile Programs | 55,649 | 55,649 | |
| Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support | 66,128 | 66,128 | |
| Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion | 8,571 | 8,571 | |
| Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas | 12,000 | 12,000 | |
| Facility operations and target production | 338,247 | 338,247 | |
| High energy density R&D | 0 | 0 | |
| National ignition facility, LLNL | 0 | 0 | |
| Z Facility, SNL | 0 | 0 | |
| Omega laser facility, URochester | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield | 480,595 | 480,595 | |
| Advanced simulation and computing | |||
| Advanced simulation and computing | 789,849 | 789,849 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 18–D–620, Exascale Computing Facility Modernization Project, LLNL | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| Total, Advanced simulation and computing | 839,849 | 839,849 | |
| Advanced manufacturing | |||
| Additive manufacturing | 18,500 | 18,500 | |
| Component manufacturing development | 48,410 | 48,410 | |
| Process technology development | 69,998 | 30,914 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–39,804] | ||
| Total, Advanced manufacturing | 136,908 | 97,824 | |
| Total, RDT&E | 2,277,867 | 2,184,254 | |
| Infrastructure and operations | |||
| Operations of facilities | 905,000 | 870,000 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–35,000] | ||
| Safety and environmental operations | 119,000 | 110,000 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–9,000] | ||
| Maintenance and repair of facilities | 456,000 | 456,000 | |
| Recapitalization: | |||
| Infrastructure and safety | 447,657 | 447,657 | |
| Capability based investments | 135,341 | 109,057 | |
| Unjustified program growth | [–26,284] | ||
| Total, Recapitalization | 582,998 | 556,714 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 19–D–670, 138kV Power Transmission System Replacement, NNSS | 6,000 | 6,000 | |
| 18–D–690, Lithium Processing Facility, Y–12 (formerly Lithium Production Capability, Y–12) | 32,000 | 39,000 | |
| Program increase | [7,000] | ||
| 18–D–650, Tritium Finishing Facility, SRS | 27,000 | 27,000 | |
| 17–D–640, U1a Complex Enhancements Project, NNSS | 35,000 | 35,000 | |
| 15–D–612, Emergency Operations Center, LLNL | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| 15–D–611, Emergency Operations Center, SNL | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
| 15–D–301, HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX | 123,000 | 123,000 | |
| 06–D–141 Uranium processing facility Y–12, Oak Ridge, TN | 745,000 | 745,000 | |
| 04–D–125, Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Project, LANL | 168,444 | 168,444 | |
| Total, Construction | 1,145,444 | 1,152,444 | |
| Total, Infrastructure and operations | 3,208,442 | 3,145,158 | |
| Secure transportation asset | |||
| Operations and equipment | 209,502 | 209,502 | |
| Program direction | 107,660 | 107,660 | |
| Total, Secure transportation asset | 317,162 | 317,162 | |
| Defense nuclear security | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 778,213 | 750,000 | |
| Excess to need | [–28,213] | ||
| Total, Defense nuclear security | 778,213 | 750,000 | |
| Information technology and cybersecurity | 309,362 | 309,362 | |
| Legacy contractor pensions | 91,200 | 91,200 | |
| Total, Weapons Activities | 12,408,603 | 11,807,074 | |
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | |||
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs | |||
| Global material security | |||
| International nuclear security | 48,839 | 48,839 | |
| Domestic radiological security | 90,513 | 90,513 | |
| International radiological security | 60,827 | 80,827 | |
| Secure additional radiologic materials | [20,000] | ||
| Nuclear smuggling detection and deterrence | 142,171 | 142,171 | |
| Total, Global material security | 342,350 | 362,350 | |
| Material management and minimization | |||
| HEU reactor conversion | 114,000 | 114,000 | |
| Nuclear material removal | 32,925 | 32,925 | |
| Material disposition | 186,608 | 186,608 | |
| Total, Material management & minimization | 333,533 | 333,533 | |
| Nonproliferation and arms control | 137,267 | 137,267 | |
| Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D | 495,357 | 525,357 | |
| Proliferation detection research | [15,000] | ||
| Additional verification and detection effort | [15,000] | ||
| Nonproliferation Construction: | |||
| 18–D–150 Surplus Plutonium Disposition Project | 79,000 | 79,000 | |
| 99–D–143 Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility, SRS | 220,000 | 213,500 | |
| Program decrease | [–6,500] | ||
| Total, Nonproliferation construction | 299,000 | 292,500 | |
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs | 1,607,507 | 1,651,007 | |
| Legacy contractor pensions | 13,700 | 13,700 | |
| Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response program | 372,095 | 340,380 | |
| Unjustified cost growth | [–31,715] | ||
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | 1,993,302 | 2,005,087 | |
| Naval Reactors | |||
| Naval reactors development | 531,205 | 514,951 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–16,254] | ||
| Columbia-Class reactor systems development | 75,500 | 75,500 | |
| S8G Prototype refueling | 155,000 | 155,000 | |
| Naval reactors operations and infrastructure | 553,591 | 553,591 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 20-D–931, KL Fuel Development Laboratory | 23,700 | 23,700 | |
| 19–D–930, KS Overhead Piping | 20,900 | 20,900 | |
| 14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF | 238,000 | 238,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 282,600 | 282,600 | |
| Program direction | 50,500 | 50,500 | |
| Total, Naval Reactors | 1,648,396 | 1,632,142 | |
| Federal Salaries And Expenses | |||
| Program direction | 434,699 | 410,000 | |
| Unjustified growth | [–24,699] | ||
| Total, Office Of The Administrator | 434,699 | 410,000 | |
| Defense Environmental Cleanup | |||
| Closure sites: | |||
| Closure sites administration | 4,987 | 4,987 | |
| Richland: | |||
| River corridor and other cleanup operations | 139,750 | 139,750 | |
| Central plateau remediation | 472,949 | 522,949 | |
| Program increase | [50,000] | ||
| Richland community and regulatory support | 5,121 | 5,121 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 18–D–404 WESF Modifications and Capsule Storage | 11,000 | 11,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 11,000 | 11,000 | |
| Total, Hanford site | 628,820 | 678,820 | |
| Office of River Protection: | |||
| Waste Treatment Immobilization Plant Commissioning | 15,000 | 15,000 | |
| Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 677,460 | 705,460 | |
| Program increase | [28,000] | ||
| Construction: | |||
| 18–D–16 Waste treatment and immobilization plant—LBL/Direct feed LAW | 640,000 | 640,000 | |
| 01–D–16 D, High-level waste facility | 30,000 | 30,000 | |
| 01–D–16 E—Pretreatment Facility | 20,000 | 20,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 690,000 | 690,000 | |
| ORP Low-level waste offsite disposal | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| Total, Office of River Protection | 1,392,460 | 1,420,460 | |
| Idaho National Laboratory: | |||
| Idaho cleanup and waste disposition | 331,354 | 331,354 | |
| Idaho community and regulatory support | 3,500 | 3,500 | |
| Total, Idaho National Laboratory | 334,854 | 334,854 | |
| NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites | |||
| Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | 1,727 | 1,727 | |
| LLNL Excess facilities R&D | 128,000 | 128,000 | |
| Nuclear facility D & D | |||
| Separations Process Research Unit | 15,300 | 15,300 | |
| Nevada | 60,737 | 60,737 | |
| Sandia National Laboratories | 2,652 | 2,652 | |
| Los Alamos National Laboratory | 195,462 | 195,462 | |
| Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites | 403,878 | 403,878 | |
| Oak Ridge Reservation: | |||
| OR Nuclear facility D & D | 93,693 | 93,693 | |
| Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D | 93,693 | 93,693 | |
| U233 Disposition Program | 45,000 | 45,000 | |
| OR cleanup and waste disposition | |||
| OR cleanup and disposition | 82,000 | 82,000 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 17–D–401 On-site waste disposal facility | 15,269 | 15,269 | |
| 14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility | 49,000 | 49,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 64,269 | 64,269 | |
| Total, OR cleanup and waste disposition | 146,269 | 146,269 | |
| OR community & regulatory support | 4,819 | 4,819 | |
| OR technology development and deployment | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| OR Excess facilities D&D | 0 | ||
| Total, Oak Ridge Reservation | 292,781 | 292,781 | |
| Savannah River Sites: | |||
| Savannah River risk management operations | |||
| Savannah River risk management operations | 490,613 | 515,613 | |
| Program increase | [25,000] | ||
| Construction: | |||
| 18–D–402, Emergency Operations Center | 6,792 | 6,792 | |
| Total, risk management operations | 497,405 | 522,405 | |
| SR community and regulatory support | 4,749 | 11,249 | |
| Program increase | [6,500] | ||
| Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 797,706 | 797,706 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 20-D–402 Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative Facility (AMC) | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| 20-D–401 Saltstone Disposal Unit #10, 11, 12 | 500 | 500 | |
| 18–D–402 Saltstone Disposal Unit #8/9 | 51,750 | 51,750 | |
| 17–D–402 Saltstone Disposal Unit #7 | 40,034 | 40,034 | |
| 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River Site | 20,988 | 20,988 | |
| Total, Construction | 163,272 | 163,272 | |
| Total, Savannah River site | 1,463,132 | 1,494,632 | |
| Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | |||
| Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | 299,088 | 299,088 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 15–D–411 Safety significant confinement ventilation system, WIPP | 58,054 | 58,054 | |
| 15–D–412 Exhaust shaft, WIPP | 34,500 | 34,500 | |
| Total, Construction | 92,554 | 92,554 | |
| Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | 391,642 | 391,642 | |
| Program direction | 278,908 | 278,908 | |
| Program support | 12,979 | 12,979 | |
| Safeguards and Security | |||
| Safeguards and Security | 317,622 | 317,622 | |
| Total, Safeguards and Security | 317,622 | 317,622 | |
| Use of prior year balances | –15,562 | –15,562 | |
| Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup | 5,506,501 | 5,616,001 | |
| Other Defense Activities | |||
| Environment, health, safety and security | |||
| Environment, health, safety and security | 139,628 | 139,628 | |
| Program direction | 72,881 | 72,881 | |
| Total, Environment, Health, safety and security | 212,509 | 212,509 | |
| Independent enterprise assessments | |||
| Independent enterprise assessments | 24,068 | 24,068 | |
| Program direction | 57,211 | 57,211 | |
| Total, Independent enterprise assessments | 81,279 | 81,279 | |
| Specialized security activities | 254,578 | 254,578 | |
| Office of Legacy Management | |||
| Legacy management | 283,767 | 283,767 | |
| Program direction | 19,262 | 19,262 | |
| Total, Office of Legacy Management | 303,029 | 303,029 | |
| Defense related administrative support | |||
| Chief financial officer | 54,538 | 54,538 | |
| Chief information officer | 124,554 | 124,554 | |
| Total, Defense related administrative support | 179,092 | 179,092 | |
| Office of hearings and appeals | 4,852 | 4,852 | |
| Subtotal, Other defense activities | 1,035,339 | 1,035,339 | |
| Total, Other Defense Activities | 1,035,339 | 1,035,339 | |
| Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal | |||
| Yucca mountain and interim storage | 26,000 | 0 | |
| Program cut | 0 | [–26,000] | |
| Total, Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal | 26,000 | 0 | |
Amend the title so as to read: “A bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2020 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.”.
Union Calendar No. 88 | |||||
| |||||
[Report No. 116–120] | |||||
A BILL | |||||
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2020 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes. | |||||
June 19, 2019 | |||||
Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed |