116th CONGRESS 1st Session |
To require the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce to provide estimates relating to the distribution of aggregate economic growth across specific percentile groups of income.
December 18, 2019
Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Udall, Mr. Peters, Ms. Smith, Mr. Cardin, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Warren, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Booker, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Brown, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Reed, Mr. Warner, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Casey, and Mr. Markey) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
To require the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce to provide estimates relating to the distribution of aggregate economic growth across specific percentile groups of income.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
This Act may be cited as the “Measuring Real Income Growth Act of 2019”.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Economic inequality in the United States has increased dramatically during the 4 decades preceding the date of enactment of this Act, with fewer households taking home a larger share of the national income.
(2) While growth was once distributed relatively evenly across all individuals in the United States, research shows that economic gains are increasingly enjoyed by the most affluent. By contrast, the majority of individuals in the United States have seen income and wage growth significantly below what is suggested by national measures of output and income.
(3) The Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce (referred to in this section as “BEA”) reports annual and quarterly estimates of gross domestic product (referred to in this section as “GDP”) in the United States. These estimates are important measures of the overall size and health of the economy of the United States but do not describe how economic gains are distributed across the population of the United States.
(4) In a country of 325,000,000 individuals, top-line GDP numbers do not capture the full range of household economic experiences and may be misleading. For example, the real GDP grew more than 3 percent annually between 2003 and 2005, but the average income for 1⁄2 of all individuals in the United States fell during that period.
(5) Disaggregating economic growth by income groups will provide a more complete picture of how families in the United States are faring across all rungs of the economic ladder and whether economic growth is benefitting all individuals in the United States.
(6) Recent academic estimates of distributional growth show how much of the economic gains during the 40 years preceding the date of enactment of this Act have accrued to the top of the income distribution. Between 1980 and 2014, the average income of the top 1 percent of the income distribution grew 5 times as much as the average income of the bottom 90 percent of the income distribution and more than 9 times as much as the average income of the bottom 1⁄2 .
(7) Official and timely estimates of distributional growth from BEA, reported alongside top-line GDP numbers, would enable Congress to better evaluate economic policies that impact every individual in the United States.
(8) Efforts to address slow wage growth, stagnant incomes, and growing economic inequality require broadening the focus beyond GDP and obtaining metrics that better correspond to the experiences of all families in the United States.
SEC. 3. Estimates of aggregate economic growth across income groups.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) BUREAU.—The term “Bureau” means the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce.
(2) GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT ANALYSIS.—The term “gross domestic product analysis”—
(A) means a quarterly or annual analysis conducted by the Bureau with respect to the gross domestic product of the United States; and
(B) includes a revision prepared by the Bureau of an analysis described in subparagraph (A).
(1) IN GENERAL.—With respect to each gross domestic product analysis that is conducted on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Bureau shall include in the gross domestic product analysis a recent estimate of, with respect to specific percentile groups of income, the total amount that was added to the economy of the United States during the period to which the gross domestic product analysis pertains, including in—
(A) each of the 10 deciles of income; and
(B) the highest 1 percent of income.
(2) RECENT ESTIMATES.—With respect to each recent estimate that, under paragraph (1), the Bureau is required to include in a gross domestic product analysis, that estimate shall be the most recent estimate that is available on the date on which that gross domestic product analysis is conducted.
(3) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Commerce such sums as are necessary to carry out this subsection.
(c) Authority To share information with BEA.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 6103(j)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking “such return information reflected on returns of corporations” and inserting “such returns, or return information reflected thereon,”.
(2) APPLICATION OF SUBCHAPTER III OF chapter 35 OF TITLE 44.—The provisions of subchapter III of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, relating to the confidentiality and disclosure of information shall apply to any return or return information acquired by the Bureau under section 6103(j)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by paragraph (1).