Bill SponsorBILLSPONSOR
Bill Sponsor
Politicians
Bills
House Bill 4893
117th Congress(2021-2022)
BLUE Act
Introduced
Introduced
Introduced in House on Jul 30, 2021
Overview
Text
Introduced in House 
Jul 30, 2021
About Linkage
Multiple bills can contain the same text. This could be an identical bill in the opposite chamber or a smaller bill with a section embedded in a larger bill.
Bill Sponsor regularly scans bill texts to find sections that are contained in other bill texts. When a matching section is found, the bills containing that section can be viewed by clicking "View Bills" within the bill text section.
Bill Sponsor is currently only finding exact word-for-word section matches. In a future release, partial matches will be included.
Introduced in House(Jul 30, 2021)
Jul 30, 2021
About Linkage
Multiple bills can contain the same text. This could be an identical bill in the opposite chamber or a smaller bill with a section embedded in a larger bill.
Bill Sponsor regularly scans bill texts to find sections that are contained in other bill texts. When a matching section is found, the bills containing that section can be viewed by clicking "View Bills" within the bill text section.
Bill Sponsor is currently only finding exact word-for-word section matches. In a future release, partial matches will be included.
Jump To
H. R. 4893 (Introduced-in-House)


117th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 4893


To prohibit a State or local government from using highway safety program funds for traffic control or traffic enforcement if such State or local government defunds the police, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 30, 2021

Mr. Nehls (for himself and Mr. Crawford) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To prohibit a State or local government from using highway safety program funds for traffic control or traffic enforcement if such State or local government defunds the police, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Blocking Lawlessness from Undermining Enforcement Act” or the “BLUE Act”.

SEC. 2. Prohibition on use of funds.

(a) Highway safety programs.—Section 402(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(5) TRAFFIC CONTROL OR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT.—

“(A) PROHIBITION.—A State, local government, or political subdivision of a State, may not expend funds apportioned to such State under this section, including funds transferred pursuant to section 405(a)(8), for traffic control or traffic enforcement if such State, local government, or political subdivision defunds the police.

“(B) EXEMPTION.—

“(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may grant an exemption from the requirements under subparagraph (A) if the State, local government, or political subdivision that defunds the police submits a written request to the Secretary and the Secretary approves such request.

“(ii) CONTENTS.—A request submitted under clause (i) shall include—

“(I) the justification for the requested exemption from the requirements of subparagraph (A); and

“(II) a description of amount of funds a State, local government, or political subdivision intends to use for traffic control or traffic enforcement.

“(C) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to result in a reduction in the amount of funding a State may receive under this section.

“(D) DEFINITIONS.—In this paragraph:

“(i) DEFUND THE POLICE.—

“(I) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘defund the police’ means a situation in which—

“(aa) a State, local government, or political subdivision of a State has a police budget for—

“(AA) the fiscal year during which this paragraph is enacted that is lower in amount than such police budget for the fiscal year that includes January 1, 2000; or

“(BB) any fiscal year following the fiscal year during which this paragraph is enacted that is lower in amount than such police budget for the previous fiscal year; and

“(bb) such State, local government, or political subdivision has reallocated such police budget funds to other government agencies, evidenced by public statements, press releases, budget justifications, budget documentation, or any other materials.

“(II) EXCLUSIONS.—The term ‘defund the police’ does not include a situation in which—

“(aa) a State, local government, or political subdivision of a State reduces funding for a police department if the reduction of such funding is part of an overall budget reduction; or

“(bb) a police chief of a police department has decided to reallocate funds made available to such police department to psychological and mental health programs.

“(ii) TRAFFIC CONTROL OR TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT.—The term ‘traffic control or traffic enforcement’ means a service provided by law enforcement officers in a State, local government, or political subdivision of a State that includes directing traffic, addressing traffic infractions on roadways, or serving in a traffic or roads policing unit enforcing rules of the road.”.

(b) National priority safety programs.—Section 405(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(11) USE OF FUNDS.—

“(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a State, local government, or political subdivision of a State receiving a grant under this section may not use such grant for traffic control or traffic enforcement (as such term is defined in section 402(c)(5)(D)) if such State, local government, or political subdivision defunds the police (as such term is defined in section 402(c)(5)(D)).

“(B) EXEMPTION.—

“(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may grant an exemption from the requirements under subparagraph (A) if the State, local government, or political subdivision that defunds the police submits a written request to the Secretary and the Secretary approves such request.

“(ii) CONTENTS.—A request submitted under clause (i) shall include—

“(I) the justification for the requested exemption from the requirements of subparagraph (A); and

“(II) a description of amount of funds a State, local government, or political subdivision intends to use for traffic control or traffic enforcement.

“(C) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to result in a reduction in the amount of funding a State may receive under this section.”.

(c) Report.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report describing the implementation of, and compliance with, the amendments made by this Act.